## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add in GPU and generic resource type allocation to the executors.
Note this is part of a bigger feature for gpu-aware scheduling and is just how the executor find the resources. The general flow :
- users ask for a certain set of resources, for instance number of gpus - each cluster manager has a specific way to do this.
- cluster manager allocates a container or set of resources (standalone mode)
- When spark launches the executor in that container, the executor either has to be told what resources it has or it has to auto discover them.
- Executor has to register with Driver and tell the driver the set of resources it has so the scheduler can use that to schedule tasks that requires a certain amount of each of those resources
In this pr I added configs and arguments to the executor to be able discover resources. The argument to the executor is intended to be used by standalone mode or other cluster managers that don't have isolation so that it can assign specific resources to specific executors in case there are multiple executors on a node. The argument is a file contains JSON Array of ResourceInformation objects.
The discovery script is meant to be used in an isolated environment where the executor only sees the resources it should use.
Note that there will be follow on PRs to add other parts like the scheduler part. See the epic high level jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24615
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests and manually tested.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#24406 from tgravescs/gpu-sched-executor-clean.
Authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a bug where `--supervised` Spark jobs would retry multiple times whenever an agent would crash, come back, and re-register even when those jobs had already relaunched on a different agent.
That is:
```
- supervised driver is running on agent1
- agent1 crashes
- driver is relaunched on another agent as `<task-id>-retry-1`
- agent1 comes back online and re-registers with scheduler
- spark relaunches the same job as `<task-id>-retry-2`
- now there are two jobs running simultaneously
```
This is because when an agent would come back and re-register it would send a status update `TASK_FAILED` for its old driver-task. Previous logic would indiscriminately remove the `submissionId` from Zookeeper's `launchedDrivers` node and add it to `retryList` node. Then, when a new offer came in, it would relaunch another `-retry-` task even though one was previously running.
For example logs, scroll to bottom
## How was this patch tested?
- Added a unit test to simulate behavior described above
- Tested manually on a DC/OS cluster by
```
- launching a --supervised spark job
- dcos node ssh <to the agent with the running spark-driver>
- systemctl stop dcos-mesos-slave
- docker kill <driver-container-id>
- [ wait until spark job is relaunched ]
- systemctl start dcos-mesos-slave
- [ observe spark driver is not relaunched as `-retry-2` ]
```
Log snippets included below. Notice the `-retry-1` task is running when status update for the old task comes in afterward:
```
19/01/15 19:21:38 TRACE MesosClusterScheduler: Received offers from Mesos:
... [offers] ...
19/01/15 19:21:39 TRACE MesosClusterScheduler: Using offer 5d421001-0630-4214-9ecb-d5838a2ec149-O2532 to launch driver driver-20190115192138-0001 with taskId: value: "driver-20190115192138-0001"
...
19/01/15 19:21:42 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001 state=TASK_STARTING message=''
19/01/15 19:21:43 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001 state=TASK_RUNNING message=''
...
19/01/15 19:29:12 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001 state=TASK_LOST message='health check timed out' reason=REASON_SLAVE_REMOVED
...
19/01/15 19:31:12 TRACE MesosClusterScheduler: Using offer 5d421001-0630-4214-9ecb-d5838a2ec149-O2681 to launch driver driver-20190115192138-0001 with taskId: value: "driver-20190115192138-0001-retry-1"
...
19/01/15 19:31:15 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001-retry-1 state=TASK_STARTING message=''
19/01/15 19:31:16 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001-retry-1 state=TASK_RUNNING message=''
...
19/01/15 19:33:45 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001 state=TASK_FAILED message='Unreachable agent re-reregistered'
...
19/01/15 19:33:45 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001 state=TASK_FAILED message='Abnormal executor termination: unknown container' reason=REASON_EXECUTOR_TERMINATED
19/01/15 19:33:45 ERROR MesosClusterScheduler: Unable to find driver with driver-20190115192138-0001 in status update
...
19/01/15 19:33:47 TRACE MesosClusterScheduler: Using offer 5d421001-0630-4214-9ecb-d5838a2ec149-O2729 to launch driver driver-20190115192138-0001 with taskId: value: "driver-20190115192138-0001-retry-2"
...
19/01/15 19:33:50 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001-retry-2 state=TASK_STARTING message=''
19/01/15 19:33:51 INFO MesosClusterScheduler: Received status update: taskId=driver-20190115192138-0001-retry-2 state=TASK_RUNNING message=''
```
Closes#24276 from samvantran/SPARK-27347-duplicate-retries.
Authored-by: Sam Tran <stran@mesosphere.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For the below three thread configuration items applied to both driver and executor,
spark.rpc.io.serverThreads
spark.rpc.io.clientThreads
spark.rpc.netty.dispatcher.numThreads,
we separate them to driver specifics and executor specifics.
spark.driver.rpc.io.serverThreads < - > spark.executor.rpc.io.serverThreads
spark.driver.rpc.io.clientThreads < - > spark.executor.rpc.io.clientThreads
spark.driver.rpc.netty.dispatcher.numThreads < - > spark.executor.rpc.netty.dispatcher.numThreads
Spark reads these specifics first and fall back to the common configurations.
## How was this patch tested?
We ran the SimpleMap app without shuffle for benchmark purpose to test Spark's scalability in HPC with omini-path NIC which has higher bandwidth than normal ethernet NIC.
Spark's base version is 2.4.0.
Spark ran in the Standalone mode. Driver was in a standalone node.
After the separation, the performance is improved a lot in 256 nodes and 512 nodes. see below test results of SimpleMapTask before and after the enhancement. You can view the tables in the [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26632) too.
ds: spark.driver.rpc.io.serverThreads
dc: spark.driver.rpc.io.clientThreads
dd: spark.driver.rpc.netty.dispatcher.numThreads
ed: spark.executor.rpc.netty.dispatcher.numThreads
time: Overall Time (s)
old time: Overall Time without Separation (s)
**Before:**
nodes | ds | dc | dd | ed | time
-- |-- | -- | -- | -- | --
128 nodes | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 108
256 nodes | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 196
512 nodes | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 377
**After:**
nodes | ds | dc | dd | ed | time | improvement
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
128 nodes | 15 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 107 | 0.9%
256 nodes | 12 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 159 | 18.8%
512 nodes | 12 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 283 | 24.9%
Closes#23560 from zjf2012/thread_conf_separation.
Authored-by: jiafu.zhang@intel.com <jiafu.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids usage of reflective calls in Scala. It removes the import that suppresses the warnings and rewrites code in small ways to avoid accessing methods that aren't technically accessible.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#24463 from srowen/SPARK-27571.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr adds 2 maven properties to help us upgrade the built-in Hive.
| Property Name | Default | In future |
| ------ | ------ | ------ |
| hive.classifier | (none) | core |
| hive.parquet.group | com.twitter | org.apache.parquet |
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23996 from wangyum/add_2_maven_properties.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Escape arguments for submissions sent to a Mesos dispatcher; analogous change to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24380 for confs.
Since this changes behavior than some users are undoubtedly already working around, probably best to only only merge into master.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new unit test, covering some existing behavior as well.
Closes#23967 from mwlon/SPARK-27015.
Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Retrieve enableFetcherCache option from submission conf rather than dispatcher conf. This resolves some confusing behavior where Spark drivers currently get this conf from the dispatcher, whereas Spark executors get this conf from the submission. After this change, the conf will only need to be specified once.
## How was this patch tested?
With (updated) existing tests.
Closes#23924 from mwlon/SPARK-26192.
Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`MetricsSystem` instance creations have a scattered distribution in the project code. So do their names. It may cause some inconvenience for browsing and management.
This PR tries to put them together. In this way, we can have a uniform location for adding or removing them, and have a overall view of `MetircsSystem `instances in current project.
It's also helpful for maintaining user documents by avoiding missing something.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#23869 from SongYadong/metrics_system_inst_manage.
Lead-authored-by: SongYadong <song.yadong1@zte.com.cn>
Co-authored-by: walter2001 <ydsong2007@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to use `System.nanoTime()` instead of `System.currentTimeMillis()` in measurements of time intervals.
`System.currentTimeMillis()` returns current wallclock time and will follow changes to the system clock. Thus, negative wallclock adjustments can cause timeouts to "hang" for a long time (until wallclock time has caught up to its previous value again). This can happen when ntpd does a "step" after the network has been disconnected for some time. The most canonical example is during system bootup when DHCP takes longer than usual. This can lead to failures that are really hard to understand/reproduce. `System.nanoTime()` is guaranteed to be monotonically increasing irrespective of wallclock changes.
## How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites.
Closes#23727 from MaxGekk/system-nanotime.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch makes hardcoded configs in "mesos" module to use ConfigEntry, avoiding issues on mistake like SPARK-26082.
Please note that there're some changes on type while migrating to ConfigEntry: specifically "comma-separated list on a string" becomes "sequence of strings". While SparkConf smoothly handles on the change (comma-separated list on a string is still supported so backward compatible), there're some methods in utility class (`mesos` package private) to depend on the type change, so this patch also modifies the method signature for them a bit.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23743 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-26843.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#23744 added a UT to prevent a future regression. However, it breaks Scala-2.11 build. This fixes that.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test with Scala-2.11 profile.
Closes#23755 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-26082-FOLLOW-UP-V2.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds UT on testing SPARK-26082 to avoid regression. While #23743 reduces the possibility to make a similar mistake, the needed lines of code for adding tests are not that huge, so I guess it might be worth to add them.
## How was this patch tested?
Newly added UTs. Test "supports setting fetcher cache" fails when #23743 is not applied and succeeds when #23743 is applied.
Closes#23744 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-26082-add-unit-test.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* change MesosClusterScheduler to use correct argument name for Mesos fetch cache (spark.mesos.fetchCache.enable -> spark.mesos.fetcherCache.enable)
## How was this patch tested?
Not sure this requires a test, since it's just a string change.
Closes#23734 from mwlon/SPARK-26082.
Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes adding a new configuration on SHS: custom executor log URL pattern. This will enable end users to replace executor logs to other than RM provide, like external log service, which enables to serve executor logs when NodeManager becomes unavailable in case of YARN.
End users can build their own of custom executor log URLs with pre-defined patterns which would be vary on each resource manager. This patch adds some patterns to YARN resource manager. (For others, there's even no executor log url available so cannot define patterns as well.)
Please refer the doc change as well as added UTs in this patch to see how to set up the feature.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT, as well as manual test with YARN cluster
Closes#23260 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-26311.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
This change addes a new mode for credential renewal that does not require
a keytab; it uses the local ticket cache instead, so it works while the
user keeps the cache valid.
This can be useful for, e.g., people running long spark-shell sessions where
their kerberos login is kept up-to-date.
The main change to enable this behavior is in HadoopDelegationTokenManager,
with a small change in the HDFS token provider. The other changes are to avoid
creating duplicate tokens when submitting the application to YARN; they allow
the tokens from the scheduler to be sent to the YARN AM, reducing the round trips
to HDFS.
For that, the scheduler initialization code was changed a little bit so that
the tokens are available when the YARN client is initialized. That basically
takes care of a long-standing TODO that was in the code to clean up configuration
propagation to the driver's RPC endpoint (in CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend).
Tested with an app designed to stress this functionality, with both keytab and
cache-based logins. Some basic kerberos tests on k8s also.
Closes#23525 from vanzin/SPARK-26595.
Authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR makes hardcoded `spark.dynamicAllocation`, `spark.scheduler`, `spark.rpc`, `spark.task`, `spark.speculation`, and `spark.cleaner` configs to use `ConfigEntry`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#23416 from kiszk/SPARK-26463.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR makes hardcoded configs below to use `ConfigEntry`.
* spark.kryo
* spark.kryoserializer
* spark.serializer
* spark.jars
* spark.files
* spark.submit
* spark.deploy
* spark.worker
This patch doesn't change configs which are not relevant to SparkConf (e.g. system properties).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23532 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-26466-v2.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a new configuration 'spark.mesos.driver.memoryOverhead' for providing the driver memory overhead in mesos cluster mode.
## How was this patch tested?
Verified it manually, Resource Scheduler allocates (drivermemory+ driver memoryOverhead) for driver in mesos cluster mode.
Closes#17726 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-17928.
Authored-by: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Currently there is code scattered in a bunch of places to do different
things related to HTTP security, such as access control, setting
security-related headers, and filtering out bad content. This makes it
really easy to miss these things when writing new UI code.
This change creates a new filter that does all of those things, and
makes sure that all servlet handlers that are attached to the UI get
the new filter and any user-defined filters consistently. The extent
of the actual features should be the same as before.
The new filter is added at the end of the filter chain, because authentication
is done by custom filters and thus needs to happen first. This means that
custom filters see unfiltered HTTP requests - which is actually the current
behavior anyway.
As a side-effect of some of the code refactoring, handlers added after
the initial set also get wrapped with a GzipHandler, which didn't happen
before.
Tested with added unit tests and in a history server with SPNEGO auth
configured.
Closes#23302 from vanzin/SPARK-24522.
Authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR makes hardcoded `spark.test` and `spark.testing` configs to use `ConfigEntry` and put them in the config package.
## How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Closes#23413 from mgaido91/SPARK-26491.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
This change modifies the behavior of the delegation token code when running
on YARN, so that the driver controls the renewal, in both client and cluster
mode. For that, a few different things were changed:
* The AM code only runs code that needs DTs when DTs are available.
In a way, this restores the AM behavior to what it was pre-SPARK-23361, but
keeping the fix added in that bug. Basically, all the AM code is run in a
"UGI.doAs()" block; but code that needs to talk to HDFS (basically the
distributed cache handling code) was delayed to the point where the driver
is up and running, and thus when valid delegation tokens are available.
* SparkSubmit / ApplicationMaster now handle user login, not the token manager.
The previous AM code was relying on the token manager to keep the user
logged in when keytabs are used. This required some odd APIs in the token
manager and the AM so that the right UGI was exposed and used in the right
places.
After this change, the logged in user is handled separately from the token
manager, so the API was cleaned up, and, as explained above, the whole AM
runs under the logged in user, which also helps with simplifying some more code.
* Distributed cache configs are sent separately to the AM.
Because of the delayed initialization of the cached resources in the AM, it
became easier to write the cache config to a separate properties file instead
of bundling it with the rest of the Spark config. This also avoids having
to modify the SparkConf to hide things from the UI.
* Finally, the AM doesn't manage the token manager anymore.
The above changes allow the token manager to be completely handled by the
driver's scheduler backend code also in YARN mode (whether client or cluster),
making it similar to other RMs. To maintain the fix added in SPARK-23361 also
in client mode, the AM now sends an extra message to the driver on initialization
to fetch delegation tokens; and although it might not really be needed, the
driver also keeps the running AM updated when new tokens are created.
Tested in a kerberized cluster with the same tests used to validate SPARK-23361,
in both client and cluster mode. Also tested with a non-kerberized cluster.
Closes#23338 from vanzin/SPARK-25689.
Authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR upgrades Mockito from 1.10.19 to 2.23.4. The following changes are required.
- Replace `org.mockito.Matchers` with `org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers`
- Replace `anyObject` with `any`
- Replace `getArgumentAt` with `getArgument` and add type annotation.
- Use `isNull` matcher in case of `null` is invoked.
```scala
saslHandler.channelInactive(null);
- verify(handler).channelInactive(any(TransportClient.class));
+ verify(handler).channelInactive(isNull());
```
- Make and use `doReturn` wrapper to avoid [SI-4775](https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4775)
```scala
private def doReturn(value: Any) = org.mockito.Mockito.doReturn(value, Seq.empty: _*)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.
Closes#23452 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-26536.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR makes hardcoded spark.driver, spark.executor, and spark.cores.max configs to use `ConfigEntry`.
Note that some config keys are from `SparkLauncher` instead of defining in the config package object because the string is already defined in it and it does not depend on core module.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23415 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26445/hardcoded_driver_executor_configs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes Spark's default Scala version as 2.12, and Scala 2.11 will be the alternative version. This implies that Scala 2.12 will be used by our CI builds including pull request builds.
We'll update the Jenkins to include a new compile-only jobs for Scala 2.11 to ensure the code can be still compiled with Scala 2.11.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#22967 from dbtsai/scala2.12.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently definitions of config entries in `core` module are in several files separately. We should move them into `internal/config` to be easy to manage.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22928 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-25926/single_config_file.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
This avoids having two classes to deal with tokens; now the above
class is a one-stop shop for dealing with delegation tokens. The
YARN backend extends that class instead of doing composition like
before, resulting in a bit less code there too.
The renewer functionality is basically the same code that used to
be in YARN's AMCredentialRenewer. That is also the reason why the
public API of HadoopDelegationTokenManager is a little bit odd;
the YARN AM has some odd requirements for how this all should be
initialized, and the weirdness is needed currently to support that.
Tested:
- YARN with stress app for DT renewal
- Mesos and K8S with basic kerberos tests (both tgt and keytab)
Closes#22624 from vanzin/SPARK-23781.
Authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is to bump the master branch version to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22606 from gatorsmile/bump3.0.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a rule to force `.toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT)` or `toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT)`.
It produces an error as below:
```
[error] Are you sure that you want to use toUpperCase or toLowerCase without the root locale? In most cases, you
[error] should use toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT) or toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT) instead.
[error] If you must use toUpperCase or toLowerCase without the root locale, wrap the code block with
[error] // scalastyle:off caselocale
[error] .toUpperCase
[error] .toLowerCase
[error] // scalastyle:on caselocale
```
This PR excludes the cases above for SQL code path for external calls like table name, column name and etc.
For test suites, or when it's clear there's no locale problem like Turkish locale problem, it uses `Locale.ROOT`.
One minor problem is, `UTF8String` has both methods, `toLowerCase` and `toUpperCase`, and the new rule detects them as well. They are ignored.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and Jenkins tests.
Closes#22581 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-25565.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Heartbeat shouldn't include accumulators for zero metrics.
Heartbeats sent from executors to the driver every 10 seconds contain metrics and are generally on the order of a few KBs. However, for large jobs with lots of tasks, heartbeats can be on the order of tens of MBs, causing tasks to die with heartbeat failures. We can mitigate this by not sending zero metrics to the driver.
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22473 from mukulmurthy/25449-heartbeat.
Authored-by: Mukul Murthy <mukul.murthy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the dev list, we can still discuss whether the next version is 2.5.0 or 3.0.0. Let us first bump the master branch version to `2.5.0-SNAPSHOT`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22426 from gatorsmile/bumpVersionMaster.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Correct some comparisons between unrelated types to what they seem to… have been trying to do
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22384 from srowen/SPARK-25398.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The configuration parameter "spark.shuffle.service.enabled" has defined in `package.scala`, and it is also used in many place, so we can replace it with `SHUFFLE_SERVICE_ENABLED`.
and unified this configuration parameter "spark.shuffle.service.port" together.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22306 from 10110346/unifiedserviceenable.
Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We shall check whether the barrier stage requires more slots (to be able to launch all tasks in the barrier stage together) than the total number of active slots currently, and fail fast if trying to submit a barrier stage that requires more slots than current total number.
This PR proposes to add a new method `getNumSlots()` to try to get the total number of currently active slots in `SchedulerBackend`, support of this new method has been added to all the first-class scheduler backends except `MesosFineGrainedSchedulerBackend`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases in `BarrierStageOnSubmittedSuite`.
Closes#22001 from jiangxb1987/SPARK-24819.
Lead-authored-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(a) disabled rest submission server by default in standalone mode
(b) fails the standalone master if rest server enabled & authentication secret set
(c) fails the mesos cluster dispatcher if authentication secret set
(d) doc updates
(e) when submitting a standalone app, only try the rest submission first if spark.master.rest.enabled=true
otherwise you'd see a 10 second pause like
18/08/09 08:13:22 INFO RestSubmissionClient: Submitting a request to launch an application in spark://...
18/08/09 08:13:33 WARN RestSubmissionClient: Unable to connect to server spark://...
I also made sure the mesos cluster dispatcher failed with the secret enabled, though I had to do that on slightly different code as I don't have mesos native libs around.
## How was this patch tested?
I ran the tests in the mesos module & in core for org.apache.spark.deploy.*
I ran a test on a cluster with standalone master to make sure I could still start with the right configs, and would fail the right way too.
Closes#22071 from squito/rest_doc_updates.
Authored-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing typos is sometimes very hard. It's not so easy to visually review them. Recently, I discovered a very useful tool for it, [misspell](https://github.com/client9/misspell).
This pull request fixes minor typos detected by [misspell](https://github.com/client9/misspell) except for the false positives. If you would like me to work on other files as well, let me know.
## How was this patch tested?
### before
```
$ misspell . | grep -v '.js'
R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R:354:43: "definiton" is a misspelling of "definition"
R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R:424:43: "definiton" is a misspelling of "definition"
R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R:445:43: "definiton" is a misspelling of "definition"
R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R:495:43: "definiton" is a misspelling of "definition"
NOTICE-binary:454:16: "containd" is a misspelling of "contained"
R/pkg/R/context.R:46:43: "definiton" is a misspelling of "definition"
R/pkg/R/context.R:74:43: "definiton" is a misspelling of "definition"
R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R:591:48: "persistance" is a misspelling of "persistence"
R/pkg/R/streaming.R:166:44: "occured" is a misspelling of "occurred"
R/pkg/inst/worker/worker.R:65:22: "ouput" is a misspelling of "output"
R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_utils.R:106:25: "environemnt" is a misspelling of "environment"
common/kvstore/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/util/kvstore/InMemoryStoreSuite.java:38:39: "existant" is a misspelling of "existent"
common/kvstore/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/util/kvstore/LevelDBSuite.java:83:39: "existant" is a misspelling of "existent"
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/crypto/TransportCipher.java:243:46: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java:234:19: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java:238:63: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java:244:46: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java:276:39: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/AbstractFileRegion.java:27:20: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
common/unsafe/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8StringPropertyCheckSuite.scala:195:15: "orgin" is a misspelling of "origin"
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala:621:39: "gauranteed" is a misspelling of "guaranteed"
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/storeTypes.scala:113:29: "ect" is a misspelling of "etc"
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStore.scala:282:18: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ListenerBus.scala:64:17: "overriden" is a misspelling of "overridden"
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ShuffleSuite.scala:211:7: "substracted" is a misspelling of "subtracted"
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala:1922:49: "agriculteur" is a misspelling of "agriculture"
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala:2468:84: "truely" is a misspelling of "truly"
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/FlatmapIteratorSuite.scala:25:18: "persistance" is a misspelling of "persistence"
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/FlatmapIteratorSuite.scala:26:69: "persistance" is a misspelling of "persistence"
data/streaming/AFINN-111.txt:1219:0: "humerous" is a misspelling of "humorous"
dev/run-pip-tests:55:28: "enviroments" is a misspelling of "environments"
dev/run-pip-tests:91:37: "virutal" is a misspelling of "virtual"
dev/merge_spark_pr.py:377:72: "accross" is a misspelling of "across"
dev/merge_spark_pr.py:378:66: "accross" is a misspelling of "across"
dev/run-pip-tests:126:25: "enviroments" is a misspelling of "environments"
docs/configuration.md:1830:82: "overriden" is a misspelling of "overridden"
docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md:525:45: "processs" is a misspelling of "processes"
docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md:1165:61: "BETWEN" is a misspelling of "BETWEEN"
docs/sql-programming-guide.md:1891:810: "behaivor" is a misspelling of "behavior"
examples/src/main/python/sql/arrow.py:98:8: "substract" is a misspelling of "subtract"
examples/src/main/python/sql/arrow.py:103:27: "substract" is a misspelling of "subtract"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:5:63: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:6:2: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:29: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:39: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:49: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:59: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:2: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:12: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:29: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:39: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:5:63: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:6:2: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:29: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:39: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:49: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:59: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:2: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:12: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:29: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:39: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/hungarian.txt:170:0: "teh" is a misspelling of "the"
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/portuguese.txt:53:0: "eles" is a misspelling of "eels"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala:99:20: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala:539:11: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala:77:36: "Teh" is a misspelling of "The"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/StreamingKMeans.scala:230:24: "inital" is a misspelling of "initial"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala:276:9: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala:237:26: "descripiton" is a misspelling of "descriptions"
python/pyspark/find_spark_home.py:30:13: "enviroment" is a misspelling of "environment"
python/pyspark/context.py:937:12: "supress" is a misspelling of "suppress"
python/pyspark/context.py:938:12: "supress" is a misspelling of "suppress"
python/pyspark/context.py:939:12: "supress" is a misspelling of "suppress"
python/pyspark/context.py:940:12: "supress" is a misspelling of "suppress"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:6:63: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:7:2: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:263:29: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:263:39: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:270:49: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:270:59: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:275:2: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:275:12: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:277:29: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:277:39: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:713:8: "probabilty" is a misspelling of "probability"
python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py:1038:8: "Currenlty" is a misspelling of "Currently"
python/pyspark/ml/stat.py:339:23: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
python/pyspark/ml/regression.py:1378:20: "paramter" is a misspelling of "parameter"
python/pyspark/mllib/stat/_statistics.py:262:8: "probabilty" is a misspelling of "probability"
python/pyspark/rdd.py:1363:32: "paramter" is a misspelling of "parameter"
python/pyspark/streaming/tests.py:825:42: "retuns" is a misspelling of "returns"
python/pyspark/sql/tests.py:768:29: "initalization" is a misspelling of "initialization"
python/pyspark/sql/tests.py:3616:31: "initalize" is a misspelling of "initialize"
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala:120:39: "arbitary" is a misspelling of "arbitrary"
resource-managers/mesos/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArgumentsSuite.scala:26:45: "sucessfully" is a misspelling of "successfully"
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala:358:27: "constaints" is a misspelling of "constraints"
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala:111:24: "senstive" is a misspelling of "sensitive"
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala:1063:5: "overwirte" is a misspelling of "overwrite"
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala:1348:17: "compatability" is a misspelling of "compatibility"
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala:77:36: "paramter" is a misspelling of "parameter"
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala:1374:22: "precendence" is a misspelling of "precedence"
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala:238:27: "unnecassary" is a misspelling of "unnecessary"
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala:212:17: "whn" is a misspelling of "when"
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinHelper.scala:147:60: "timestmap" is a misspelling of "timestamp"
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/TPCDSQuerySuite.scala:150:45: "precentage" is a misspelling of "percentage"
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchemaSuite.scala:135:29: "infered" is a misspelling of "inferred"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/golden/udf_instr-1-2e76f819563dbaba4beb51e3a130b922:1:52: "occurance" is a misspelling of "occurrence"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/golden/udf_instr-2-32da357fc754badd6e3898dcc8989182:1:52: "occurance" is a misspelling of "occurrence"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/golden/udf_locate-1-6e41693c9c6dceea4d7fab4c02884e4e:1:63: "occurance" is a misspelling of "occurrence"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/golden/udf_locate-2-d9b5934457931447874d6bb7c13de478:1:63: "occurance" is a misspelling of "occurrence"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/golden/udf_translate-2-f7aa38a33ca0df73b7a1e6b6da4b7fe8:9:79: "occurence" is a misspelling of "occurrence"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/golden/udf_translate-2-f7aa38a33ca0df73b7a1e6b6da4b7fe8:13:110: "occurence" is a misspelling of "occurrence"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/annotate_stats_join.q:46:105: "distint" is a misspelling of "distinct"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/auto_sortmerge_join_11.q:29:3: "Currenly" is a misspelling of "Currently"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/avro_partitioned.q:72:15: "existant" is a misspelling of "existent"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/decimal_udf.q:25:3: "substraction" is a misspelling of "subtraction"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/groupby2_map_multi_distinct.q:16:51: "funtion" is a misspelling of "function"
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/groupby_sort_8.q:15:30: "issueing" is a misspelling of "issuing"
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/HadoopFsRelationTest.scala:669:52: "wiht" is a misspelling of "with"
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/java/org/apache/hive/service/cli/session/HiveSessionImpl.java:474:9: "Refering" is a misspelling of "Referring"
```
### after
```
$ misspell . | grep -v '.js'
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/AbstractFileRegion.java:27:20: "transfered" is a misspelling of "transferred"
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/storeTypes.scala:113:29: "ect" is a misspelling of "etc"
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala:1922:49: "agriculteur" is a misspelling of "agriculture"
data/streaming/AFINN-111.txt:1219:0: "humerous" is a misspelling of "humorous"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:5:63: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:6:2: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:29: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:39: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:49: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:59: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:2: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:12: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:29: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:39: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:5:63: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:6:2: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:29: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:262:39: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:49: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:269:59: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:2: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:274:12: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:29: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
licenses-binary/LICENSE-heapq.txt:276:39: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/hungarian.txt:170:0: "teh" is a misspelling of "the"
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/portuguese.txt:53:0: "eles" is a misspelling of "eels"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala:99:20: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala:539:11: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala:77:36: "Teh" is a misspelling of "The"
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala:276:9: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:6:63: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:7:2: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:263:29: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:263:39: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:270:49: "Stichting" is a misspelling of "Stitching"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:270:59: "Mathematisch" is a misspelling of "Mathematics"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:275:2: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:275:12: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:277:29: "STICHTING" is a misspelling of "STITCHING"
python/pyspark/heapq3.py:277:39: "MATHEMATISCH" is a misspelling of "MATHEMATICS"
python/pyspark/ml/stat.py:339:23: "Euclidian" is a misspelling of "Euclidean"
```
Closes#22070 from seratch/fix-typo.
Authored-by: Kazuhiro Sera <seratch@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Propose new APIs and modify job/task scheduling to support barrier execution mode, which requires all tasks in a same barrier stage start at the same time, and retry all tasks in case some tasks fail in the middle. The barrier execution mode is useful for some ML/DL workloads.
The proposed API changes include:
- `RDDBarrier` that marks an RDD as barrier (Spark must launch all the tasks together for the current stage).
- `BarrierTaskContext` that support global sync of all tasks in a barrier stage, and provide extra `BarrierTaskInfo`s.
In DAGScheduler, we retry all tasks of a barrier stage in case some tasks fail in the middle, this is achieved by unregistering map outputs for a shuffleId (for ShuffleMapStage) or clear the finished partitions in an active job (for ResultStage).
## How was this patch tested?
Add `RDDBarrierSuite` to ensure we convert RDDs correctly;
Add new test cases in `DAGSchedulerSuite` to ensure we do task scheduling correctly;
Add new test cases in `SparkContextSuite` to ensure the barrier execution mode actually works (both under local mode and local cluster mode).
Add new test cases in `TaskSchedulerImplSuite` to ensure we schedule tasks for barrier taskSet together.
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#21758 from jiangxb1987/barrier-execution-mode.
This PR use spark.network.timeout in place of spark.storage.blockManagerSlaveTimeoutMs when it is not configured, as configuration doc said
manual test
Author: xueyu <278006819@qq.com>
Closes#21575 from xueyumusic/slaveTimeOutConfig.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change extends YARN resource allocation handling with blacklisting functionality.
This handles cases when node is messed up or misconfigured such that a container won't launch on it. Before this change backlisting only focused on task execution but this change introduces YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker which tracks allocation failures per host (when enabled via "spark.yarn.blacklist.executor.launch.blacklisting.enabled").
## How was this patch tested?
### With unit tests
Including a new suite: YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.
#### Manually
It was tested on a cluster by deleting the Spark jars on one of the node.
#### Behaviour before these changes
Starting Spark as:
```
spark2-shell --master yarn --deploy-mode client --num-executors 4 --conf spark.executor.memory=4g --conf "spark.yarn.max.executor.failures=6"
```
Log is:
```
18/04/12 06:49:36 INFO yarn.ApplicationMaster: Final app status: FAILED, exitCode: 11, (reason: Max number of executor failures (6) reached)
18/04/12 06:49:39 INFO yarn.ApplicationMaster: Unregistering ApplicationMaster with FAILED (diag message: Max number of executor failures (6) reached)
18/04/12 06:49:39 INFO impl.AMRMClientImpl: Waiting for application to be successfully unregistered.
18/04/12 06:49:39 INFO yarn.ApplicationMaster: Deleting staging directory hdfs://apiros-1.gce.test.com:8020/user/systest/.sparkStaging/application_1523459048274_0016
18/04/12 06:49:39 INFO util.ShutdownHookManager: Shutdown hook called
```
#### Behaviour after these changes
Starting Spark as:
```
spark2-shell --master yarn --deploy-mode client --num-executors 4 --conf spark.executor.memory=4g --conf "spark.yarn.max.executor.failures=6" --conf "spark.yarn.blacklist.executor.launch.blacklisting.enabled=true"
```
And the log is:
```
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Will request 1 executor container(s), each with 1 core(s) and 4505 MB memory (including 409 MB of overhead)
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Submitted 1 unlocalized container requests.
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Launching container container_1523459048274_0025_01_000008 on host apiros-4.gce.test.com for executor with ID 6
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Received 1 containers from YARN, launching executors on 1 of them.
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Completed container container_1523459048274_0025_01_000007 on host: apiros-4.gce.test.com (state: COMPLETE, exit status: 1)
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker: blacklisting host as YARN allocation failed: apiros-4.gce.test.com
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker: adding nodes to YARN application master's blacklist: List(apiros-4.gce.test.com)
18/04/13 05:37:43 WARN yarn.YarnAllocator: Container marked as failed: container_1523459048274_0025_01_000007 on host: apiros-4.gce.test.com. Exit status: 1. Diagnostics: Exception from container-launch.
Container id: container_1523459048274_0025_01_000007
Exit code: 1
Stack trace: ExitCodeException exitCode=1:
at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:604)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.run(Shell.java:507)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell$ShellCommandExecutor.execute(Shell.java:789)
at org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.DefaultContainerExecutor.launchContainer(DefaultContainerExecutor.java:213)
at org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.launcher.ContainerLaunch.call(ContainerLaunch.java:302)
at org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.launcher.ContainerLaunch.call(ContainerLaunch.java:82)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
Where the most important part is:
```
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker: blacklisting host as YARN allocation failed: apiros-4.gce.test.com
18/04/13 05:37:43 INFO yarn.YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker: adding nodes to YARN application master's blacklist: List(apiros-4.gce.test.com)
```
And execution was continued (no shutdown called).
### Testing the backlisting of the whole cluster
Starting Spark with YARN blacklisting enabled then removing a the Spark core jar one by one from all the cluster nodes. Then executing a simple spark job which fails checking the yarn log the expected exit status is contained:
```
18/06/15 01:07:10 INFO yarn.ApplicationMaster: Final app status: FAILED, exitCode: 11, (reason: Due to executor failures all available nodes are blacklisted)
18/06/15 01:07:13 INFO util.ShutdownHookManager: Shutdown hook called
```
Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Closes#21068 from attilapiros/SPARK-16630.
`WebUI` defines `addStaticHandler` that web UIs don't use (and simply introduce duplication). Let's clean them up and remove duplications.
Local build and waiting for Jenkins
Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>
Closes#21510 from jaceklaskowski/SPARK-24490-Use-WebUI.addStaticHandler.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Adds support for local:// scheme like in k8s case for image based deployments where the jar is already in the image. Affects cluster mode and the mesos dispatcher. Covers also file:// scheme. Keeps the default case where jar resolution happens on the host.
## How was this patch tested?
Dispatcher image with the patch, use it to start DC/OS Spark service:
skonto/spark-local-disp:test
Test image with my application jar located at the root folder:
skonto/spark-local:test
Dockerfile for that image.
From mesosphere/spark:2.3.0-2.2.1-2-hadoop-2.6
COPY spark-examples_2.11-2.2.1.jar /
WORKDIR /opt/spark/dist
Tests:
The following work as expected:
* local normal example
```
dcos spark run --submit-args="--conf spark.mesos.appJar.local.resolution.mode=container --conf spark.executor.memory=1g --conf spark.mesos.executor.docker.image=skonto/spark-local:test
--conf spark.executor.cores=2 --conf spark.cores.max=8
--class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi local:///spark-examples_2.11-2.2.1.jar"
```
* make sure the flag does not affect other uris
```
dcos spark run --submit-args="--conf spark.mesos.appJar.local.resolution.mode=container --conf spark.executor.memory=1g --conf spark.executor.cores=2 --conf spark.cores.max=8
--class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/fdp-stavros-test/spark-examples_2.11-2.1.1.jar"
```
* normal example no local
```
dcos spark run --submit-args="--conf spark.executor.memory=1g --conf spark.executor.cores=2 --conf spark.cores.max=8
--class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/fdp-stavros-test/spark-examples_2.11-2.1.1.jar"
```
The following fails
* uses local with no setting, default is host.
```
dcos spark run --submit-args="--conf spark.executor.memory=1g --conf spark.mesos.executor.docker.image=skonto/spark-local:test
--conf spark.executor.cores=2 --conf spark.cores.max=8
--class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi local:///spark-examples_2.11-2.2.1.jar"
```
Author: Stavros Kontopoulos <stavros.kontopoulos@lightbend.com>
Closes#21378 from skonto/local-upstream.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces `getTimeAsMs` with `getTimeAsSeconds` to fix the issue that reading "spark.network.timeout" using a wrong time unit when the user doesn't specify a time out.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Closes#21382 from zsxwing/fix-network-timeout-conf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR retrieves the proxyBase automatically from the header `X-Forwarded-Context` (if available). This is the header used by Knox to inform the proxied service about the base path.
This provides 0-configuration support for Knox gateway (instead of having to properly set `spark.ui.proxyBase`) and it allows to access directly SHS when it is proxied by Knox. In the previous scenario, indeed, after setting `spark.ui.proxyBase`, direct access to SHS was not working fine (due to bad link generated).
## How was this patch tested?
added UT + manual tests
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21268 from mgaido91/SPARK-24209.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Shell escaped the name passed to spark-submit and change how conf attributes are shell escaped.
## How was this patch tested?
This test has been tested manually with Hive-on-spark with mesos or with the use case described in the issue with the sparkPi application with a custom name which contains illegal shell characters.
With this PR, hive-on-spark on mesos works like a charm with hive 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
I state that this contribution is my original work and that I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license
Author: Bounkong Khamphousone <bounkong.khamphousone@ebiznext.com>
Closes#21014 from tiboun/fix/SPARK-23941.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added support to specify the 'spark.executor.extraJavaOptions' value in terms of the `{{APP_ID}}` and/or `{{EXECUTOR_ID}}`, `{{APP_ID}}` will be replaced by Application Id and `{{EXECUTOR_ID}}` will be replaced by Executor Id while starting the executor.
## How was this patch tested?
I have verified this by checking the executor process command and gc logs. I verified the same in different deployment modes(Standalone, YARN, Mesos) client and cluster modes.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#21088 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-24003.
The current in-process launcher implementation just calls the SparkSubmit
object, which, in case of errors, will more often than not exit the JVM.
This is not desirable since this launcher is meant to be used inside other
applications, and that would kill the application.
The change turns SparkSubmit into a class, and abstracts aways some of
the functionality used to print error messages and abort the submission
process. The default implementation uses the logging system for messages,
and throws exceptions for errors. As part of that I also moved some code
that doesn't really belong in SparkSubmit to a better location.
The command line invocation of spark-submit now uses a special implementation
of the SparkSubmit class that overrides those behaviors to do what is expected
from the command line version (print to the terminal, exit the JVM, etc).
A lot of the changes are to replace calls to methods such as "printErrorAndExit"
with the new API.
As part of adding tests for this, I had to fix some small things in the
launcher option parser so that things like "--version" can work when
used in the launcher library.
There is still code that prints directly to the terminal, like all the
Ivy-related code in SparkSubmitUtils, and other areas where some re-factoring
would help, like the CommandLineUtils class, but I chose to leave those
alone to keep this change more focused.
Aside from existing and added unit tests, I ran command line tools with
a bunch of different arguments to make sure messages and errors behave
like before.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#20925 from vanzin/SPARK-22941.
Currently, the Spark AM relies on the initial set of tokens created by
the submission client to be able to talk to HDFS and other services that
require delegation tokens. This means that after those tokens expire, a
new AM will fail to start (e.g. when there is an application failure and
re-attempts are enabled).
This PR makes it so that the first thing the AM does when the user provides
a principal and keytab is to create new delegation tokens for use. This
makes sure that the AM can be started irrespective of how old the original
token set is. It also allows all of the token management to be done by the
AM - there is no need for the submission client to set configuration values
to tell the AM when to renew tokens.
Note that even though in this case the AM will not be using the delegation
tokens created by the submission client, those tokens still need to be provided
to YARN, since they are used to do log aggregation.
To be able to re-use the code in the AMCredentialRenewal for the above
purposes, I refactored that class a bit so that it can fetch tokens into
a pre-defined UGI, insted of always logging in.
Another issue with re-attempts is that, after the fix that allows the AM
to restart correctly, new executors would get confused about when to
update credentials, because the credential updater used the update time
initially set up by the submission code. This could make the executor
fail to update credentials in time, since that value would be very out
of date in the situation described in the bug.
To fix that, I changed the YARN code to use the new RPC-based mechanism
for distributing tokens to executors. This allowed the old credential
updater code to be removed, and a lot of code in the renewer to be
simplified.
I also made two currently hardcoded values (the renewal time ratio, and
the retry wait) configurable; while this probably never needs to be set
by anyone in a production environment, it helps with testing; that's also
why they're not documented.
Tested on real cluster with a specially crafted application to test this
functionality: checked proper access to HDFS, Hive and HBase in cluster
mode with token renewal on and AM restarts. Tested things still work in
client mode too.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#20657 from vanzin/SPARK-23361.
This commit modifies the Mesos submission client to allow the principal
and secret to be provided indirectly via files. The path to these files
can be specified either via Spark configuration or via environment
variable.
Assuming these files are appropriately protected by FS/OS permissions
this means we don't ever leak the actual values in process info like ps
Environment variable specification is useful because it allows you to
interpolate the location of this file when using per-user Mesos
credentials.
For some background as to why we have taken this approach I will briefly describe our set up. On our systems we provide each authorised user account with their own Mesos credentials to provide certain security and audit guarantees to our customers. These credentials are managed by a central Secret management service. In our `spark-env.sh` we determine the appropriate secret and principal files to use depending on the user who is invoking Spark hence the need to inject these via environment variables as well as by configuration properties. So we set these environment variables appropriately and our Spark read in the contents of those files to authenticate itself with Mesos.
This is functionality we have been using it in production across multiple customer sites for some time. This has been in the field for around 18 months with no reported issues. These changes have been sufficient to meet our customer security and audit requirements.
We have been building and deploying custom builds of Apache Spark with various minor tweaks like this which we are now looking to contribute back into the community in order that we can rely upon stock Apache Spark builds and stop maintaining our own internal fork.
Author: Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org>
Closes#20167 from rvesse/SPARK-16501.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch bumps the master branch version to `2.4.0-SNAPSHOT`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20222 from gatorsmile/bump24.
This change adds a new launcher that allows applications to be run
in a separate thread in the same process as the calling code. To
achieve that, some code from the child process implementation was
moved to abstract classes that implement the common functionality,
and the new launcher inherits from those.
The new launcher was added as a new class, instead of implemented
as a new option to the existing SparkLauncher, to avoid ambigous
APIs. For example, SparkLauncher has ways to set the child app's
environment, modify SPARK_HOME, or control the logging of the
child process, none of which apply to in-process apps.
The in-process launcher has limitations: it needs Spark in the
context class loader of the calling thread, and it's bound by
Spark's current limitation of a single client-mode application
per JVM. It also relies on the recently added SparkApplication
trait to make sure different apps don't mess up each other's
configuration, so config isolation is currently limited to cluster mode.
I also chose to keep the same socket-based communication for in-process
apps, even though it might be possible to avoid it for in-process
mode. That helps both implementations share more code.
Tested with new and existing unit tests, and with a simple app that
uses the launcher; also made sure the app ran fine with older launcher
jar to check binary compatibility.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#19591 from vanzin/SPARK-11035.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PR closed with all the comments -> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19793
It solves the problem when submitting a wrong CreateSubmissionRequest to Spark Dispatcher was causing a bad state of Dispatcher and making it inactive as a Mesos framework.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22574
## How was this patch tested?
All spark test passed successfully.
It was tested sending a wrong request (without appArgs) before and after the change. The point is easy, check if the value is null before being accessed.
This was before the change, leaving the dispatcher inactive:
```
Exception in thread "Thread-22" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.getDriverCommandValue(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:444)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.buildDriverCommand(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:451)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.org$apache$spark$scheduler$cluster$mesos$MesosClusterScheduler$$createTaskInfo(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:538)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler$$anonfun$scheduleTasks$1.apply(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:570)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler$$anonfun$scheduleTasks$1.apply(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:555)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.scheduleTasks(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:555)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.resourceOffers(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:621)
```
And after:
```
"message" : "Malformed request: org.apache.spark.deploy.rest.SubmitRestProtocolException: Validation of message CreateSubmissionRequest failed!\n\torg.apache.spark.deploy.rest.SubmitRestProtocolMessage.validate(SubmitRestProtocolMessage.scala:70)\n\torg.apache.spark.deploy.rest.SubmitRequestServlet.doPost(RestSubmissionServer.scala:272)\n\tjavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707)\n\tjavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:845)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:583)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:511)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:524)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:319)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:253)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:273)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:95)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\n\tjava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)"
```
Author: German Schiavon <germanschiavon@gmail.com>
Closes#19966 from Gschiavon/fix-submission-request.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It solves the problem when submitting a wrong CreateSubmissionRequest to Spark Dispatcher was causing a bad state of Dispatcher and making it inactive as a Mesos framework.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22574
## How was this patch tested?
All spark test passed successfully.
It was tested sending a wrong request (without appArgs) before and after the change. The point is easy, check if the value is null before being accessed.
This was before the change, leaving the dispatcher inactive:
```
Exception in thread "Thread-22" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.getDriverCommandValue(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:444)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.buildDriverCommand(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:451)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.org$apache$spark$scheduler$cluster$mesos$MesosClusterScheduler$$createTaskInfo(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:538)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler$$anonfun$scheduleTasks$1.apply(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:570)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler$$anonfun$scheduleTasks$1.apply(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:555)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.scheduleTasks(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:555)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.mesos.MesosClusterScheduler.resourceOffers(MesosClusterScheduler.scala:621)
```
And after:
```
"message" : "Malformed request: org.apache.spark.deploy.rest.SubmitRestProtocolException: Validation of message CreateSubmissionRequest failed!\n\torg.apache.spark.deploy.rest.SubmitRestProtocolMessage.validate(SubmitRestProtocolMessage.scala:70)\n\torg.apache.spark.deploy.rest.SubmitRequestServlet.doPost(RestSubmissionServer.scala:272)\n\tjavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707)\n\tjavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:845)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:583)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:511)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:524)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:319)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:253)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:273)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:95)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\n\torg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\n\tjava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)"
```
Author: German Schiavon <germanschiavon@gmail.com>
Closes#19793 from Gschiavon/fix-submission-request.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Solves the issue described in the ticket by preserving reservation and allocation info in all cases (port handling included).
- upgrades to 1.4
- Adds extra debug level logging to make debugging easier in the future, for example we add reservation info when applicable.
```
17/09/29 14:53:07 DEBUG MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend: Accepting offer: f20de49b-dee3-45dd-a3c1-73418b7de891-O32 with attributes: Map() allocation info: role: "spark-prive"
reservation info: name: "ports"
type: RANGES
ranges {
range {
begin: 31000
end: 32000
}
}
role: "spark-prive"
reservation {
principal: "test"
}
allocation_info {
role: "spark-prive"
}
```
- Some style cleanup.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually by running the example in the ticket with and without a principal. Specifically I tested it on a dc/os 1.10 cluster with 7 nodes and played with reservations. From the master node in order to reserve resources I executed:
```for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
do
curl -i \
-d slaveId=90ec65ea-1f7b-479f-a824-35d2527d6d26-S$i \
-d resources='[
{
"name": "cpus",
"type": "SCALAR",
"scalar": { "value": 2 },
"role": "spark-role",
"reservation": {
"principal": ""
}
},
{
"name": "mem",
"type": "SCALAR",
"scalar": { "value": 8026 },
"role": "spark-role",
"reservation": {
"principal": ""
}
}
]' \
-X POST http://master.mesos:5050/master/reserve
done
```
Nodes had 4 cpus (m3.xlarge instances) and I reserved either 2 or 4 cpus (all for a role).
I verified it launches tasks on nodes with reserved resources under `spark-role` role only if
a) there are remaining resources for (*) default role and the spark driver has no role assigned to it.
b) the spark driver has a role assigned to it and it is the same role used in reservations.
I also tested this locally on my machine.
Author: Stavros Kontopoulos <st.kontopoulos@gmail.com>
Closes#19390 from skonto/fix_dynamic_reservation.
The first scheduled renewal time is is set to the exact expiration time,
and all subsequent renewal times are 75% of the renewal time. This makes
it so that the inital renewal time is also 75%.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set the initial renewal time to be 75% of renewal time.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested locally in a test HDFS cluster, checking various renewal times.
Author: Kalvin Chau <kalvin.chau@viasat.com>
Closes#19798 from kalvinnchau/fix-inital-renewal-time.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
tl;dr: Add a class, `MesosHadoopDelegationTokenManager` that updates delegation tokens on a schedule on the behalf of Spark Drivers. Broadcast renewed credentials to the executors.
## The problem
We recently added Kerberos support to Mesos-based Spark jobs as well as Secrets support to the Mesos Dispatcher (SPARK-16742, SPARK-20812, respectively). However the delegation tokens have a defined expiration. This poses a problem for long running Spark jobs (e.g. Spark Streaming applications). YARN has a solution for this where a thread is scheduled to renew the tokens they reach 75% of their way to expiration. It then writes the tokens to HDFS for the executors to find (uses a monotonically increasing suffix).
## This solution
We replace the current method in `CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend` which used to discard the token renewal time with a protected method `fetchHadoopDelegationTokens`. Now the individual cluster backends are responsible for overriding this method to fetch and manage token renewal. The delegation tokens themselves, are still part of the `CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend` as before.
In the case of Mesos renewed Credentials are broadcasted to the executors. This maintains all transfer of Credentials within Spark (as opposed to Spark-to-HDFS). It also does not require any writing of Credentials to disk. It also does not require any GC of old files.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually against a Kerberized HDFS cluster.
Thank you for the reviews.
Author: ArtRand <arand@soe.ucsc.edu>
Closes#19272 from ArtRand/spark-21842-450-kerberos-ticket-renewal.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A discussed in SPARK-19606, the addition of a new config property named "spark.mesos.constraints.driver" for constraining drivers running on a Mesos cluster
## How was this patch tested?
Corresponding unit test added also tested locally on a Mesos cluster
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Paul Mackles <pmackles@adobe.com>
Closes#19543 from pmackles/SPARK-19606.
## Background
In #18837 , ArtRand added Mesos secrets support to the dispatcher. **This PR is to add the same secrets support to the drivers.** This means if the secret configs are set, the driver will launch executors that have access to either env or file-based secrets.
One use case for this is to support TLS in the driver <=> executor communication.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Most of the changes are a refactor of the dispatcher secrets support (#18837) - moving it to a common place that can be used by both the dispatcher and drivers. The same goes for the unit tests.
## How was this patch tested?
There are four config combinations: [env or file-based] x [value or reference secret]. For each combination:
- Added a unit test.
- Tested in DC/OS.
Author: Susan X. Huynh <xhuynh@mesosphere.com>
Closes#19437 from susanxhuynh/sh-mesos-driver-secret.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added Launcher support for monitoring Mesos apps in Client mode. SPARK-11033 can handle the support for Mesos/Cluster mode since the Standalone/Cluster and Mesos/Cluster modes use the same code at client side.
## How was this patch tested?
I verified it manually by running launcher application, able to launch, stop and kill the mesos applications and also can invoke other launcher API's.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#19385 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-11034.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the Spark-Mesos coarse-grained scheduler to consider the preferred locations when dynamic allocation is enabled.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unittest, and performed manual testing on AWS.
Author: Gene Pang <gene.pang@gmail.com>
Closes#18098 from gpang/mesos_data_locality.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix a trivial bug with how metrics are registered in the mesos dispatcher. Bug resulted in creating a new registry each time the metricRegistry() method was called.
## How was this patch tested?
Verified manually on local mesos setup
Author: Paul Mackles <pmackles@adobe.com>
Closes#19358 from pmackles/SPARK-22135.
…build; fix some things that will be warnings or errors in 2.12; restore Scala 2.12 profile infrastructure
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change adds back the infrastructure for a Scala 2.12 build, but does not enable it in the release or Python test scripts.
In order to make that meaningful, it also resolves compile errors that the code hits in 2.12 only, in a way that still works with 2.11.
It also updates dependencies to the earliest minor release of dependencies whose current version does not yet support Scala 2.12. This is in a sense covered by other JIRAs under the main umbrella, but implemented here. The versions below still work with 2.11, and are the _latest_ maintenance release in the _earliest_ viable minor release.
- Scalatest 2.x -> 3.0.3
- Chill 0.8.0 -> 0.8.4
- Clapper 1.0.x -> 1.1.2
- json4s 3.2.x -> 3.4.2
- Jackson 2.6.x -> 2.7.9 (required by json4s)
This change does _not_ fully enable a Scala 2.12 build:
- It will also require dropping support for Kafka before 0.10. Easy enough, just didn't do it yet here
- It will require recreating `SparkILoop` and `Main` for REPL 2.12, which is SPARK-14650. Possible to do here too.
What it does do is make changes that resolve much of the remaining gap without affecting the current 2.11 build.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and build. Manually tested with `./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.12` to verify it compiles, modulo the exceptions above.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#18645 from srowen/SPARK-14280.
Mesos has secrets primitives for environment and file-based secrets, this PR adds that functionality to the Spark dispatcher and the appropriate configuration flags.
Unit tested and manually tested against a DC/OS cluster with Mesos 1.4.
Author: ArtRand <arand@soe.ucsc.edu>
Closes#18837 from ArtRand/spark-20812-dispatcher-secrets-and-labels.
JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21694
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark already supports launching containers attached to a given CNI network by specifying it via the config `spark.mesos.network.name`.
This PR adds support to pass in network labels to CNI plugins via a new config option `spark.mesos.network.labels`. These network labels are key-value pairs that are set in the `NetworkInfo` of both the driver and executor tasks. More details in the related Mesos documentation: http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/cni/#mesos-meta-data-to-cni-plugins
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, for both driver and executor tasks.
Manual integration test to submit a job with the `spark.mesos.network.labels` option, hit the mesos/state.json endpoint, and check that the labels are set in the driver and executor tasks.
ArtRand skonto
Author: Susan X. Huynh <xhuynh@mesosphere.com>
Closes#18910 from susanxhuynh/sh-mesos-cni-labels.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Kerberos Support to Mesos. This includes kinit and --keytab support, but does not include delegation token renewal.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually against a Secure DC/OS Apache HDFS cluster.
Author: ArtRand <arand@soe.ucsc.edu>
Author: Michael Gummelt <mgummelt@mesosphere.io>
Closes#18519 from mgummelt/SPARK-16742-kerberos.
This version fixes a few issues in the import order checker; it provides
better error messages, and detects more improper ordering (thus the need
to change a lot of files in this patch). The main fix is that it correctly
complains about the order of packages vs. classes.
As part of the above, I moved some "SparkSession" import in ML examples
inside the "$example on$" blocks; that didn't seem consistent across
different source files to start with, and avoids having to add more on/off blocks
around specific imports.
The new scalastyle also seems to have a better header detector, so a few
license headers had to be updated to match the expected indentation.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#18943 from vanzin/SPARK-21731.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds a sandbox link per driver in the dispatcher ui with minimal changes after a bug was fixed here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4992
The sandbox uri has the following format:
http://<proxy_uri>/#/slaves/\<agent-id\>/ frameworks/ \<scheduler-id\>/executors/\<driver-id\>/browse
For dc/os the proxy uri is <dc/os uri>/mesos. For the dc/os deployment scenario and to make things easier I introduced a new config property named `spark.mesos.proxy.baseURL` which should be passed to the dispatcher when launched using --conf. If no such configuration is detected then no sandbox uri is depicted, and there is an empty column with a header (this can be changed so nothing is shown).
Within dc/os the base url must be a property for the dispatcher that we should add in the future here:
9e7c909c3b/repo/packages/S/spark/26/config.json
It is not easy to detect in different environments what is that uri so user should pass it.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested with the mesos test suite here: https://github.com/typesafehub/mesos-spark-integration-tests.
Attached image shows the ui modification where the sandbox header is added.
Tested the uri redirection the way it was suggested here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4992
Built mesos 1.4 from the master branch and started the mesos dispatcher with the command:
`./sbin/start-mesos-dispatcher.sh --conf spark.mesos.proxy.baseURL=http://localhost:5050 -m mesos://127.0.0.1:5050`
Run a spark example:
`./bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi --master mesos://10.10.1.79:7078 --deploy-mode cluster --executor-memory 2G --total-executor-cores 2 http://<path>/spark-examples_2.11-2.1.1.jar 10`
Sandbox uri is shown at the bottom of the page:
Redirection works as expected:
Author: Stavros Kontopoulos <st.kontopoulos@gmail.com>
Closes#18528 from skonto/adds_the_sandbox_uri.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With supervise enabled for a driver, re-launching it was failing because the driver had the same framework Id. This patch creates a new driver framework id every time we re-launch a driver, but we keep the driver submission id the same since that is the same with the task id the driver was launched with on mesos and retry state and other info within Dispatcher's data structures uses that as a key.
We append a "-retry-%4d" string as a suffix to the framework id passed by the dispatcher to the driver and the same value to the app_id created by each driver, except the first time where we dont need the retry suffix.
The previous format for the frameworkId was 'DispactherFId-DriverSubmissionId'.
We also detect the case where we have multiple spark contexts started from within the same driver and we do set proper names to their corresponding app-ids. The old practice was to unset the framework id passed from the dispatcher after the driver framework was started for the first time and let mesos decide the framework ID for subsequent spark contexts. The decided fId was passed as an appID.
This patch affects heavily the history server. Btw we dont have the issues of the standalone case where driver id must be different since the dispatcher will re-launch a driver(mesos task) only if it gets an update that it is dead and this is verified by mesos implicitly. We also dont fix the fine grained mode which is deprecated and of no use.
## How was this patch tested?
This task was manually tested on dc/os. Launched a driver, stoped its container and verified the expected behavior.
Initial retry of the driver, driver in pending state:
Driver re-launched:
Another re-try:
The resulted entries in history server at the bottom:
Regarding multiple spark contexts here is the end result regarding the spark history server, for the second spark context we add an increasing number as a suffix:
Author: Stavros Kontopoulos <st.kontopoulos@gmail.com>
Closes#18705 from skonto/fix_supervise_flag.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current behavior: in Mesos cluster mode, the driver failover_timeout is set to zero. If the driver temporarily loses connectivity with the Mesos master, the framework will be torn down and all executors killed.
Proposed change: make the failover_timeout configurable via a new option, spark.mesos.driver.failoverTimeout. The default value is still zero.
Note: with non-zero failover_timeout, an explicit teardown is needed in some cases. This is captured in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21458
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test to make sure the config option is set while creating the scheduler driver.
Ran an integration test with mesosphere/spark showing that with a non-zero failover_timeout the Spark job finishes after a driver is disconnected from the master.
Author: Susan X. Huynh <xhuynh@mesosphere.com>
Closes#18674 from susanxhuynh/sh-mesos-failover-timeout.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Address scapegoat warnings for:
- BigDecimal double constructor
- Catching NPE
- Finalizer without super
- List.size is O(n)
- Prefer Seq.empty
- Prefer Set.empty
- reverse.map instead of reverseMap
- Type shadowing
- Unnecessary if condition.
- Use .log1p
- Var could be val
In some instances like Seq.empty, I avoided making the change even where valid in test code to keep the scope of the change smaller. Those issues are concerned with performance and it won't matter for tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#18635 from srowen/Scapegoat1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding the default UncaughtExceptionHandler to the Worker.
## How was this patch tested?
I verified it manually, when any of the worker thread gets uncaught exceptions then the default UncaughtExceptionHandler will handle those exceptions.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#18357 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-21146.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the shuffle service registration timeout and retry has been hardcoded. This works well for small workloads but under heavy workload when the shuffle service is busy transferring large amount of data we see significant delay in responding to the registration request, as a result we often see the executors fail to register with the shuffle service, eventually failing the job. We need to make these two parameters configurable.
## How was this patch tested?
* Updated `BlockManagerSuite` to test registration timeout and max attempts configuration actually works.
cc sitalkedia
Author: Li Yichao <lyc@zhihu.com>
Closes#18092 from liyichao/SPARK-20640.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Mesos labels support to the Spark Dispatcher
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Michael Gummelt <mgummelt@mesosphere.io>
Closes#18220 from mgummelt/SPARK-21000-dispatcher-labels.
Restore code that was removed as part of SPARK-17979, but instead of
using the deprecated env variable name to propagate the class path, use
a new one.
Verified by running "./bin/spark-class o.a.s.executor.CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend"
manually.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#18037 from vanzin/SPARK-20814.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add stripXSS and stripXSSMap to Spark Core's UIUtils. Calling these functions at any point that getParameter is called against a HttpServletRequest.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, IBM Security AppScan Standard no longer showing vulnerabilities, manual verification of WebUI pages.
Author: NICHOLAS T. MARION <nmarion@us.ibm.com>
Closes#17686 from n-marion/xss-fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-10997, client mode Netty RpcEnv doesn't require to start server, so port configurations are not used any more, here propose to remove these two configurations: "spark.executor.port" and "spark.am.port".
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#17866 from jerryshao/SPARK-20605.
Signed-off-by: liuxian <liu.xian3zte.com.cn>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the input parameter is null, may be a runtime exception occurs
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests
Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Closes#17796 from 10110346/wip_lx_0428.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add test case for scenarios where executor.cores is set as a
(non)divisor of spark.cores.max
This tests the change in
#17786
## How was this patch tested?
Ran the existing test suite with the new tests
dbtsai
Author: Davis Shepherd <dshepherd@netflix.com>
Closes#17788 from dgshep/add_mesos_test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set maxCores to be a multiple of the smallest executor that can be launched. This ensures that we correctly detect the condition where no more executors will be launched when spark.cores.max is not a multiple of spark.executor.cores
## How was this patch tested?
This was manually tested with other sample frameworks measuring their incoming offers to determine if starvation would occur.
dbtsai mgummelt
Author: Davis Shepherd <dshepherd@netflix.com>
Closes#17786 from dgshep/fix_mesos_max_cores.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Submitted Time' field, the date format **needs to be formatted**, in running Drivers table or Completed Drivers table in master web ui.
Before fix this problem e.g.
Completed Drivers
Submission ID **Submitted Time** Worker State Cores Memory Main Class
driver-20170419145755-0005 **Wed Apr 19 14:57:55 CST 2017** worker-20170419145250-zdh120-40412 FAILED 1 1024.0 MB cn.zte.HdfsTest
please see the attachment:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12863977/before_fix.png
After fix this problem e.g.
Completed Drivers
Submission ID **Submitted Time** Worker State Cores Memory Main Class
driver-20170419145755-0006 **2017/04/19 16:01:25** worker-20170419145250-zdh120-40412 FAILED 1 1024.0 MB cn.zte.HdfsTest
please see the attachment:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12863976/after_fix.png
'Submitted Time' field, the date format **has been formatted**, in running Applications table or Completed Applicationstable in master web ui, **it is correct.**
e.g.
Running Applications
Application ID Name Cores Memory per Executor **Submitted Time** User State Duration
app-20170419160910-0000 (kill) SparkSQL::10.43.183.120 1 5.0 GB **2017/04/19 16:09:10** root RUNNING 53 s
**Format after the time easier to observe, and consistent with the applications table,so I think it's worth fixing.**
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: 郭小龙 10207633 <guo.xiaolong1@zte.com.cn>
Author: guoxiaolong <guo.xiaolong1@zte.com.cn>
Author: guoxiaolongzte <guo.xiaolong1@zte.com.cn>
Closes#17682 from guoxiaolongzte/SPARK-20385.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow passing in arbitrary parameters into docker when launching spark executors on mesos with docker containerizer tnachen
## How was this patch tested?
Manually built and tested with passed in parameter
Author: Ji Yan <jiyan@Jis-MacBook-Air.local>
Closes#17109 from yanji84/ji/allow_set_docker_user.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to run Spark unidoc to test Javadoc 8 build as Javadoc 8 is easily re-breakable.
There are several problems with it:
- It introduces little extra bit of time to run the tests. In my case, it took 1.5 mins more (`Elapsed :[94.8746569157]`). How it was tested is described in "How was this patch tested?".
- > One problem that I noticed was that Unidoc appeared to be processing test sources: if we can find a way to exclude those from being processed in the first place then that might significantly speed things up.
(see joshrosen's [comment](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18692?focusedCommentId=15947627&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15947627))
To complete this automated build, It also suggests to fix existing Javadoc breaks / ones introduced by test codes as described above.
There fixes are similar instances that previously fixed. Please refer https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15999 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Note that this only fixes **errors** not **warnings**. Please see my observation https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389#issuecomment-288438704 for spurious errors by warnings.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually via `jekyll build` for building tests. Also, tested via running `./dev/run-tests`.
This was tested via manually adding `time.time()` as below:
```diff
profiles_and_goals = build_profiles + sbt_goals
print("[info] Building Spark unidoc (w/Hive 1.2.1) using SBT with these arguments: ",
" ".join(profiles_and_goals))
+ import time
+ st = time.time()
exec_sbt(profiles_and_goals)
+ print("Elapsed :[%s]" % str(time.time() - st))
```
produces
```
...
========================================================================
Building Unidoc API Documentation
========================================================================
...
[info] Main Java API documentation successful.
...
Elapsed :[94.8746569157]
...
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17477 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-18692.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add spark.mesos.task.labels configuration option to add mesos key:value labels to the executor.
"k1:v1,k2:v2" as the format, colons separating key-value and commas to list out more than one.
Discussion of labels with mgummelt at #17404
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests to verify labels were added correctly, with incorrect labels being ignored and added a test to test the name of the executor.
Tested with: `./build/sbt -Pmesos mesos/test`
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Kalvin Chau <kalvin.chau@viasat.com>
Closes#17413 from kalvinnchau/mesos-labels.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding configurable mesos executor names and labels using `spark.mesos.task.name` and `spark.mesos.task.labels`.
Labels were defined as `k1:v1,k2:v2`.
mgummelt
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests to verify labels were added correctly, with incorrect labels being ignored and added a test to test the name of the executor.
Tested with: `./build/sbt -Pmesos mesos/test`
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Kalvin Chau <kalvin.chau@viasat.com>
Closes#17404 from kalvinnchau/mesos-config.
This commit adds a killTaskAttempt method to SparkContext, to allow users to
kill tasks so that they can be re-scheduled elsewhere.
This also refactors the task kill path to allow specifying a reason for the task kill. The reason is propagated opaquely through events, and will show up in the UI automatically as `(N killed: $reason)` and `TaskKilled: $reason`. Without this change, there is no way to provide the user feedback through the UI.
Currently used reasons are "stage cancelled", "another attempt succeeded", and "killed via SparkContext.killTask". The user can also specify a custom reason through `SparkContext.killTask`.
cc rxin
In the stage overview UI the reasons are summarized:
Within the stage UI you can see individual task kill reasons:
Existing tests, tried killing some stages in the UI and verified the messages are as expected.
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@google.com>
Closes#17166 from ericl/kill-reason.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixup typo in comment.
## How was this patch tested?
Don't need.
Author: Ye Yin <eyniy@qq.com>
Closes#17396 from hustcat/fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Increase default refuse_seconds timeout, and make it configurable. See JIRA for details on how this reduces the risk of starvation.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, Manual testing, and Mesos/Spark integration test suite
cc susanxhuynh skonto jmlvanre
Author: Michael Gummelt <mgummelt@mesosphere.io>
Closes#17031 from mgummelt/SPARK-19702-suppress-revive.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See JIRA
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, Mesos/Spark integration tests
cc skonto susanxhuynh
Author: Michael Gummelt <mgummelt@mesosphere.io>
Closes#17045 from mgummelt/SPARK-19373-registered-resources.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding the default UncaughtExceptionHandler to the MesosClusterDispatcher.
## How was this patch tested?
I verified it manually, when any of the dispatcher thread gets uncaught exceptions then the default UncaughtExceptionHandler will handle those exceptions.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#13072 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-15288.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`askSync` is already added in `RpcEndpointRef` (see SPARK-19347 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690#issuecomment-276850068) and `askWithRetry` is marked as deprecated.
As mentioned SPARK-18113(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503#event-927953218):
>askWithRetry is basically an unneeded API, and a leftover from the akka days that doesn't make sense anymore. It's prone to cause deadlocks (exactly because it's blocking), it imposes restrictions on the caller (e.g. idempotency) and other things that people generally don't pay that much attention to when using it.
Since `askWithRetry` is just used inside spark and not in user logic. It might make sense to replace all of them with `askSync`.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR doesn't change code logic, existing unit test can cover.
Author: jinxing <jinxing@meituan.com>
Closes#16790 from jinxing64/SPARK-19450.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now handling the spark exception which gets thrown for invalid job configuration, marking that job as failed and continuing to launch the other drivers instead of throwing the exception.
## How was this patch tested?
I verified manually, now the misconfigured jobs move to Finished Drivers section in UI and continue to launch the other jobs.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#13077 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-10748.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After using Apache Parquet 1.8.2, `ParquetAvroCompatibilitySuite` fails on **Maven** test. It is because `org.apache.parquet.avro.AvroParquetWriter` in the test code used new `avro 1.8.0` specific class, `LogicalType`. This PR aims to fix the test dependency of `sql/core` module to use avro 1.8.0.
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7/2530/consoleFull
```
ParquetAvroCompatibilitySuite:
*** RUN ABORTED ***
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/avro/LogicalType
at org.apache.parquet.avro.AvroParquetWriter.writeSupport(AvroParquetWriter.java:144)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing test with **Maven**.
```
$ build/mvn -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver test
...
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 02:07 h
[INFO] Finished at: 2017-02-04T05:41:43+00:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 77M/987M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
```
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#16795 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-19409-2.
This change introduces a new auth mechanism to the transport library,
to be used when users enable strong encryption. This auth mechanism
has better security than the currently used DIGEST-MD5.
The new protocol uses symmetric key encryption to mutually authenticate
the endpoints, and is very loosely based on ISO/IEC 9798.
The new protocol falls back to SASL when it thinks the remote end is old.
Because SASL does not support asking the server for multiple auth protocols,
which would mean we could re-use the existing SASL code by just adding a
new SASL provider, the protocol is implemented outside of the SASL API
to avoid the boilerplate of adding a new provider.
Details of the auth protocol are discussed in the included README.md
file.
This change partly undos the changes added in SPARK-13331; AES encryption
is now decoupled from SASL authentication. The encryption code itself,
though, has been re-used as part of this change.
## How was this patch tested?
- Unit tests
- Tested Spark 2.2 against Spark 1.6 shuffle service with SASL enabled
- Tested Spark 2.2 against Spark 2.2 shuffle service with SASL fallback disabled
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#16521 from vanzin/SPARK-19139.
In the existing code, there are three layers of serialization
involved in sending a task from the scheduler to an executor:
- A Task object is serialized
- The Task object is copied to a byte buffer that also
contains serialized information about any additional JARs,
files, and Properties needed for the task to execute. This
byte buffer is stored as the member variable serializedTask
in the TaskDescription class.
- The TaskDescription is serialized (in addition to the serialized
task + JARs, the TaskDescription class contains the task ID and
other metadata) and sent in a LaunchTask message.
While it *is* necessary to have two layers of serialization, so that
the JAR, file, and Property info can be deserialized prior to
deserializing the Task object, the third layer of deserialization is
unnecessary. This commit eliminates a layer of serialization by moving
the JARs, files, and Properties into the TaskDescription class.
This commit also serializes the Properties manually (by traversing the map),
as is done with the JARs and files, which reduces the final serialized size.
Unit tests
This is a simpler alternative to the approach proposed in #15505.
shivaram and I did some benchmarking of this and #15505 on a 20-machine m2.4xlarge EC2 machines (160 cores). We ran ~30 trials of code [1] (a very simple job with 10K tasks per stage) and measured the average time per stage:
Before this change: 2490ms
With this change: 2345 ms (so ~6% improvement over the baseline)
With witgo's approach in #15505: 2046 ms (~18% improvement over baseline)
The reason that #15505 has a more significant improvement is that it also moves the serialization from the TaskSchedulerImpl thread to the CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend thread. I added that functionality on top of this change, and got almost the same improvement [1] as #15505 (average of 2103ms). I think we should decouple these two changes, both so we have some record of the improvement form each individual improvement, and because this change is more about simplifying the code base (the improvement is negligible) while the other is about performance improvement. The plan, currently, is to merge this PR and then merge the remaining part of #15505 that moves serialization.
[1] The reason the improvement wasn't quite as good as with #15505 when we ran the benchmarks is almost certainly because, at the point when we ran the benchmarks, I hadn't updated the code to manually serialize the Properties (instead the code was using Java's default serialization for the Properties object, whereas #15505 manually serialized the Properties). This PR has since been updated to manually serialize the Properties, just like the other maps.
Author: Kay Ousterhout <kayousterhout@gmail.com>
Closes#16053 from kayousterhout/SPARK-17931.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Not adding the Killed applications for retry.
## How was this patch tested?
I have verified manually in the Mesos cluster, with the changes the killed applications move to Finished Drivers section and will not retry.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#13323 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-15555.
