### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for lateral subqueries. A lateral subquery is a subquery preceded by the `LATERAL` keyword in the FROM clause of a query that can reference columns in the preceding FROM items. For example:
```sql
SELECT * FROM t1, LATERAL (SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.c)
```
A new subquery expression`LateralSubquery` is used to represent a lateral subquery. It is similar to `ScalarSubquery` but can return multiple rows and columns. A new logical unary node `LateralJoin` is used to represent a lateral join.
Here is the analyzed plan for the above query:
```scala
Project [a, b, c, d]
+- LateralJoin lateral-subquery [a], Inner
: +- Project [c, d]
: +- Filter (outer(a) = c)
: +- Relation [c, d]
+- Relation [a, b]
```
Similar to a correlated subquery, a lateral subquery can be viewed as a dependent (nested loop) join where the evaluation of the right subtree depends on the current value of the left subtree. The same technique to decorrelate a subquery is used to decorrelate a lateral join:
```scala
Project [a, b, c, d]
+- LateralJoin lateral-subquery [a && a = c], Inner // pull up correlated predicates as join conditions
: +- Project [c, d]
: +- Relation [c, d]
+- Relation [a, b]
```
Then the lateral join can be rewritten into a normal join:
```scala
Join Inner (a = c)
:- Relation [a, b]
+- Relation [c, d]
```
#### Follow-ups:
1. Similar to rewriting correlated scalar subqueries, rewriting lateral joins is also subject to the COUNT bug (See SPARK-15370 for more details). This is **not** handled in the current PR as it requires a sizeable amount of refactoring. It will be addressed in a subsequent PR (SPARK-35551).
2. Currently Spark does use outer query references to resolve star expressions in subqueries. This is not lateral subquery specific and can be handled in a separate PR (SPARK-35618)
### Why are the changes needed?
To support an ANSI SQL feature.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. It allows users to use lateral subqueries in the FROM clause of a query.
### How was this patch tested?
- Parser test: `PlanParserSuite.scala`
- Analyzer test: `ResolveSubquerySuite.scala`
- Optimizer test: `PullupCorrelatedPredicatesSuite.scala`
- SQL test: `join-lateral.sql`, `postgreSQL/join.sql`
Closes#32303 from allisonwang-db/spark-34382-lateral.
Lead-authored-by: allisonwang-db <66282705+allisonwang-db@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If the dataset contains mix of sparse and dense vectors output of PCA seems different. The issue here is we check only the first row's Vector type. If the first row is dense and rest all the row's are sparse, we compute PCA based on dense path. Similarly, if only first row in Sparse and rest all the rows are dense, we compute based on Sparse computation path.
Following datasets will produce different results with PCA, even though the data is same, except first row type is sparse.
```
val data1 = Array(
Vectors.sparse(5, Seq((1, 1.0), (3, 7.0))),
Vectors.dense(2.0, 0.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0),
Vectors.dense(4.0, 0.0, 0.0, 6.0, 7.0)
)
```
```
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|pcaFeatures |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|[1.6485728230883807,-4.013282700516296,-5.524543751369388] |
|[-4.645104331781534,-1.1167972663619026,-5.524543751369387]|
|[-6.428880535676489,-5.337951427775355,-5.524543751369389] |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
```
```
val data1 = Array(
Vectors.dense(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 7.0, 0.0 ),
Vectors.dense(2.0, 0.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0),
Vectors.dense(4.0, 0.0, 0.0, 6.0, 7.0)
)
```
```
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|pcaFeatures |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|[1.6485728230883814,-4.0132827005162985,-1.0091435193998504]|
|[-4.645104331781533,-1.1167972663619048,-1.0091435193998501]|
|[-6.428880535676488,-5.337951427775359,-1.009143519399851] |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix inconsistent result if dataset contains both sparse and dense vectors. We need to treat the entire metrics as Sparse ONLY if all the rows are sparse. Otherwise we need to consider the matrix as dense. This PR can be a followup for the PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23126
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Closes#32734 from shahidki31/shahid/pca.
Authored-by: shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `TimestampWithoutTZType` to `DataTypeTestUtils.ordered`/`atomicTypes`, and implement values generation of those types in `LiteralGenerator`/`RandomDataGenerator`. In this way, the types will be tested automatically in:
1. ArithmeticExpressionSuite:
- "function least"
- "function greatest"
2. PredicateSuite
- "BinaryComparison consistency check"
- "AND, OR, EqualTo, EqualNullSafe consistency check"
3. ConditionalExpressionSuite
- "if"
4. RandomDataGeneratorSuite
- "Basic types"
5. CastSuite
- "null cast"
- "up-cast"
- "SPARK-27671: cast from nested null type in struct"
6. OrderingSuite
- "GenerateOrdering with TimestampWithoutTZType"
7. PredicateSuite
- "IN with different types"
8. UnsafeRowSuite
- "calling get(ordinal, datatype) on null columns"
9. SortSuite
- "sorting on TimestampWithoutTZType ..."
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suites.
Closes#32843 from gengliangwang/atomicTest.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32534#32534 proposed a use case to use `DeserializedMemoryEntry` to store off-heap data, and let Spark release the memory via the `AutoCloseable` interface. However, there is one more problem: `DeserializedMemoryEntry` always reports its size as on-heap size, which is inaccurate. If the Spark cluster is configured with small on-heap size and large off-heap size, this will trigger a lot of spilling.
This PR makes `DeserializedMemoryEntry` truly support off-heap data. Now the caller side can cache off-heap data with a new storage level `OFF_HEAP_ONLY_DESER`.
### Why are the changes needed?
correct the memory counting for off-heap data.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
updated test
Closes#32800 from cloud-fan/follow.
Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The changed [unit test](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingJoinSuite.scala#L566) was introduce in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21587, to fix the planner side of thing for stream-stream join. Ideally check the query result should catch the bug, but it would be better to add plan check to make the purpose of unit test more clearly and catch future bug from planner change.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve unit test.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Changed test itself.
Closes#32836 from c21/ss-test.
Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Handle type coercion when resolving V2 function. In particular:
- prior to evaluating function arguments, insert cast whenever the argument type doesn't match the expected input type.
- use `BoundFunction.inputTypes()` to lookup magic method for scalar function
### Why are the changes needed?
For V2 functions, the actual argument types should not necessarily match those of the input types, and Spark should handle type coercion whenever it is needed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Now V2 function resolution should be able to handle type coercion properly.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a few new tests.
Closes#32764 from sunchao/SPARK-35390.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enhances `RepartitionByExpression` to make it coalesce partitions efficiently by AQE. Usually used to merge small files.
The basic logic is: Spark first tries to coalesce partitions, if it cannot be coalesced, then use the local shuffle reader to read data to avoid exchange the data over the network.
Usage:
```sql
SELECT /*+ REPARTITION */ * FROM t
```
```scala
df.repartition()
```
For example:
coalesce small output files | local shuffle reader
--- | ---
| 
### Why are the changes needed?
Coalesce partitions efficiently.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#32781 from wangyum/SPARK-35650.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The jenkins SBT/Maven build keep failing with stack overflow error:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/139542
We should increase the JVM stack size to 16MB.
Also, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32521 set the stack size to 256MB for Java 11 build, which might be too big since every thread will allocate this memory for the stack. This PR also set it as 16MB to make the config consistent.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix SBT/Maven build.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins and GA tests.
Closes#32838 from gengliangwang/increaseSBTStackSize.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Write tests for timestamp without time zone in UDF as input parameters and results.
### Why are the changes needed?
It follows https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31779 to improve test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#32840 from gengliangwang/tswtzUDF.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR group exception messages in `sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It will largely help with standardization of error messages and its maintenance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. Error messages remain unchanged.
### How was this patch tested?
No new tests - pass all original tests to make sure it doesn't break any existing behavior.
Closes#32763 from beliefer/SPARK-35058.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extend Spark SQL API to accept `java.time.LocalDateTime` as an external type of recently added new Catalyst type - `TimestampWithoutTZ`. The Java class `java.time.LocalDateTime` has a similar semantic to ANSI SQL timestamp without timezone type, and it is the most suitable to be an external type for `TimestampWithoutTZType`. In more details:
* Added `TimestampWithoutTZConverter` which converts java.time.LocalDateTime instances to/from internal representation of the Catalyst type `TimestampWithoutTZType` (to Long type). The `TimestampWithoutTZConverter` object uses new methods of DateTimeUtils:
* localDateTimeToMicros() converts the input date time to the total length in microseconds.
* microsToLocalDateTime() obtains a java.time.LocalDateTime
* Support new type `TimestampWithoutTZType` in RowEncoder via the methods createDeserializerForLocalDateTime() and createSerializerForLocalDateTime().
* Extended the Literal API to construct literals from `java.time.LocalDateTime` instances.
### Why are the changes needed?
To allow users parallelization of `java.time.LocalDateTime` collections, and construct timestamp without time zone columns. Also to collect such columns back to the driver side.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The PR extends existing functionality. So, users can parallelize instances of the java.time.LocalDateTime class and collect them back.
```
scala> val ds = Seq(java.time.LocalDateTime.parse("1970-01-01T00:00:00")).toDS
ds: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[java.time.LocalDateTime] = [value: timestampwithouttz]
scala> ds.collect()
res0: Array[java.time.LocalDateTime] = Array(1970-01-01T00:00)
```
### How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Closes#32814 from gengliangwang/LocalDateTime.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move `assume` into methods at `PythonUDFSuite`.
### Why are the changes needed?
When we run Spark test with such command:
`./build/mvn -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pyarn -Pkubernetes clean test`
get this exception:
```
PythonUDFSuite:
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.PythonUDFSuite *** ABORTED ***
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to load a Suite class that was discovered in the runpath: org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.PythonUDFSuite
at org.scalatest.tools.DiscoverySuite$.getSuiteInstance(DiscoverySuite.scala:81)
at org.scalatest.tools.DiscoverySuite.$anonfun$nestedSuites$1(DiscoverySuite.scala:38)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:238)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:941)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:941)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1429)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:74)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:73)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:56)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:238)
```
The test env has no PYSpark module so it failed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
manual
Closes#32833 from ulysses-you/SPARK-35687.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The implementation for the save operation of RocksDBFileManager.
### Why are the changes needed?
Save all the files in the given local checkpoint directory as a committed version in DFS.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#32582 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-35436.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <yuanjian.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Spark eagerly executes commands on the caller side of `QueryExecution`, which is a bit hacky as `QueryExecution` is not aware of it and leads to confusion.
For example, if you run `sql("show tables").collect()`, you will see two queries with identical query plans in the web UI.
The first query is triggered at `Dataset.logicalPlan`, which eagerly executes the command.
The second query is triggered at `Dataset.collect`, which is the normal query execution.
From the web UI, it's hard to tell that these two queries are caused by eager command execution.
This PR proposes to move the eager command execution to `QueryExecution`, and turn the command plan to `CommandResult` to indicate that command has been executed already. Now `sql("show tables").collect()` still triggers two queries, but the quey plans are not identical. The second query becomes:
In addition to the UI improvements, this PR also has other benefits:
1. Simplifies code as caller side no need to worry about eager command execution. `QueryExecution` takes care of it.
2. It helps https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32442 , where there can be more plan nodes above commands, and we need to replace commands with something like local relation that produces unsafe rows.
### Why are the changes needed?
Explained above.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#32513 from beliefer/SPARK-35378.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to restructure User Guide in PySpark documentation for pandas APIs on Spark.
**Before**
**After**
Note that I mostly just moved the contents around except minor changes:
- Removing some questions in FAQ that don't make sense in Apache Spark
- Rename a subtitle "Working with pandas and PySpark" to "From/to pandas and PySpark DataFrames"
For renaming Koalas to either pandas-on-Spark or pandas APIs on Spark, it will be done at SPARK-35591
### Why are the changes needed?
For better readability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it restructures the documentation as shown above.
### How was this patch tested?
I manually built the docs and tested.
Closes#32820 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35647.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Seems like the new MyPy version was released (0.901) and it broke the CI: https://github.com/python/mypy/releases.
```
python/pyspark/pandas/indexes/base.py:2007: error: Argument 1 to "from_tuples" of "MultiIndex" has incompatible type "Index"; expected "List[Tuple[Any, ...]]"
python/pyspark/testing/pandasutils.py:41: error: Library stubs not installed for "tabulate" (or incompatible with Python 3.6)
python/pyspark/testing/pandasutils.py:41: note: Hint: "python3 -m pip install types-tabulate"
python/pyspark/testing/pandasutils.py:41: note: (or run "mypy --install-types" to install all missing stub packages)
python/pyspark/testing/pandasutils.py:41: note: See https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html#missing-imports
Found 2 errors in 2 files (checked 312 source files)
```
I tried to fix these instances and pin it to the latest version (0.901). However, I realised that `python/pyspark/pandas/indexes/base.py:2007` has a logic issue (see https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/1325#discussion_r647889901 and https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/1325#discussion_r647890007) which cannot be fixed quickly.
Therefore, I decided to pin it to the previous version we used before for now, in order to unblock other PRs builds.
### Why are the changes needed?
To unblock other PRs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
I tested in my local but it has to be tested and passed in GitHub Actions in this PR.
Closes#32829 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35682.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor LocalDateTimeUDT as YearUDT in UserDefinedTypeSuite
### Why are the changes needed?
As we are going to support java.time.LocalDateTime as an external type of TimestampWithoutTZ type https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32814, registering java.time.LocalDateTime as UDT will cause test failures: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/139469/testReport/
This PR is to unblock https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32814.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#32824 from gengliangwang/UDTFollowUp.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Limit the batch size for `add_shuffle_key` in `partitionBy` function to fix `OverflowError: cannot convert float infinity to integer`
### Why are the changes needed?
It's not easy to write a UT, but I can use some simple code to explain the bug.
* Original code
```
def add_shuffle_key(split, iterator):
buckets = defaultdict(list)
c, batch = 0, min(10 * numPartitions, 1000)
for k, v in iterator:
buckets[partitionFunc(k) % numPartitions].append((k, v))
c += 1
# check used memory and avg size of chunk of objects
if (c % 1000 == 0 and get_used_memory() > limit
or c > batch):
n, size = len(buckets), 0
for split in list(buckets.keys()):
yield pack_long(split)
d = outputSerializer.dumps(buckets[split])
del buckets[split]
yield d
size += len(d)
avg = int(size / n) >> 20
# let 1M < avg < 10M
if avg < 1:
batch *= 1.5
elif avg > 10:
batch = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)
c = 0
```
if `get_used_memory() > limit` always is `True` and `avg < 1` always is `True`, the variable `batch` will grow to infinity. then `batch = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)` may raise `OverflowError` if `avg > 10` at some time.
* sample code to reproduce the bug
```
import sys
limit = 100
used_memory = 200
numPartitions = 64
c, batch = 0, min(10 * numPartitions, 1000)
while True:
c += 1
if (c % 1000 == 0 and used_memory > limit or c > batch):
batch = batch * 1.5
d = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)
print(c, batch)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
It's not easy to write a UT, there is sample code to test
```
import sys
limit = 100
used_memory = 200
numPartitions = 64
c, batch = 0, min(10 * numPartitions, 1000)
while True:
c += 1
if (c % 1000 == 0 and used_memory > limit or c > batch):
batch = min(sys.maxsize, batch * 1.5)
d = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)
print(c, batch)
```
Closes#32667 from nolanliou/fix_partitionby.
Authored-by: liuqi <nolan.liou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an issue that both key and value of state schema cannot accept long length (>65535 bytes) JSON.
To solve the problem explained below, JSON represented schema is divided into chunks whose maximum length is 65535 bytes, and each chunk is written by `DataOutputStream.writeUTF`.
As the solution changes the format of the schema, the version is also changes from `1` to `2` but old version schema is still acceptable to ensures backward compatibility.
### Why are the changes needed?
In the current implementation, writing state schema fails if the length of schema exceeds 65535 bytes and `UTFDataFormatException` is thrown.
It's due to the limitation of `DataOutputStream.writeUTF`.
`writeUTF` writes a length field first and it's 2 bytes width, meaning the maximum content length is limited to `2^16-1`=`65535` bytes.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/io/DataOutputStream.html#writeUTF-java.lang.String-
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New tests.
Closes#32788 from sarutak/fix-UTFDataFormatException.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix Scala doc for removed parameters for `InvokeLike.invoke`.
### Why are the changes needed?
#32532 forgot to update the Scala doc after removing 2 parameters for `InvokeLike.invoke`. This fixes it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#32827 from sunchao/SPARK-35384-followup.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes the usage of putting null into StateStore.
### Why are the changes needed?
According to `get` method doc in `StateStore` API, it returns non-null row if the key exists. So basically we should avoid write null to `StateStore`. You cannot distinguish if the returned null row is because the key doesn't exist, or the value is actually null. And due to the defined behavior of `get`, it is quite easy to cause NPE error if the caller doesn't expect to get a null if the caller believes the key exists.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#32796 from viirya/fix-ss-joinstatemanager.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch introduces a new option to specify the minimum number of offsets to read per trigger i.e. minOffsetsPerTrigger and maxTriggerDelay to avoid the infinite wait for the trigger.
This new option will allow skipping trigger/batch when the number of records available in Kafka is low. This is a very useful feature in cases where we have a sudden burst of data at certain intervals in a day and data volume is low for the rest of the day.
'maxTriggerDelay' option will help to avoid cases of infinite delay in scheduling trigger and the trigger will happen irrespective of records available if the maxTriggerDelay time exceeds the last trigger. It would be an optional parameter with a default value of 15 mins. This option will be only applicable if minOffsetsPerTrigger is set.
minOffsetsPerTrigger option would be optional of course, but once specified it would take precedence over maxOffestsPerTrigger which will be honored only after minOffsetsPerTrigger is satisfied.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are many scenarios where there is a sudden burst of data at certain intervals in a day and data volume is low for the rest of the day. Tunning such jobs is difficult as decreasing trigger processing time increasing the number of batches and hence cluster resource usage and adds to small file issues. Increasing trigger processing time adds consumer lag. This patch tries to address this issue.
### How was this patch tested?
This patch was tested by adding test cases as well as manually on a cluster where the job was running for a full one day with a data burst happening once a day.
Here is the picture of databurst and hence consumer lag:
<img width="1198" alt="Screenshot 2021-04-29 at 11 39 35 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1044003/116997587-9b2ab180-acfa-11eb-91fd-524802ce3316.png">
This is how the job behaved at burst time running every 4.5 mins (which is the specified trigger time):
<img width="1154" alt="Burst Time" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1044003/116997919-12f8dc00-acfb-11eb-9b0a-98387fc67560.png">
This is job behavior during the non-burst time where it is skipping 2 to 3 triggers and running once every 9 to 13.5 mins
<img width="1154" alt="Non Burst Time" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1044003/116998244-8b5f9d00-acfb-11eb-8340-33d47149ef81.png">
Here are some more stats from the two-run i.e. one normal run and the other with minOffsetsperTrigger set:
| Run | Data Size | Number of Batch Runs | Number of Files |
| ------------- | ------------- |------------- |------------- |
| Normal Run | 54.2 GB | 320 | 21968 |
| Run with minOffsetsperTrigger | 54.2 GB | 120 | 12104 |
Closes#32653 from satishgopalani/SPARK-35312.
Authored-by: Satish Gopalani <satish.gopalani@pubmatic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to restructure API files according to the layout, see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32799. Now the pandas APIs on Spark are under a separate directory which is same level as other modules such as Spark SQL.
```bash
tree reference
```
**Before:**
```
reference
├── index.rst
├── ps_extensions.rst
├── ps_frame.rst
├── ps_general_functions.rst
├── ps_groupby.rst
├── ps_indexing.rst
├── ps_io.rst
├── ps_ml.rst
├── ps_series.rst
├── ps_window.rst
├── pyspark.ml.rst
├── pyspark.mllib.rst
├── pyspark.pandas.rst
├── pyspark.resource.rst
├── pyspark.rst
├── pyspark.sql.rst
├── pyspark.ss.rst
└── pyspark.streaming.rst
```
**After:**
```
reference
├── index.rst
├── pyspark.ml.rst
├── pyspark.mllib.rst
├── pyspark.pandas
│ ├── extensions.rst
│ ├── frame.rst
│ ├── general_functions.rst
│ ├── groupby.rst
│ ├── index.rst
│ ├── indexing.rst
│ ├── io.rst
│ ├── ml.rst
│ ├── series.rst
│ └── window.rst
├── pyspark.resource.rst
├── pyspark.rst
├── pyspark.sql.rst
├── pyspark.ss.rst
└── pyspark.streaming.rst
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To make the directory structure easier to follow.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built and tested the docs.
Closes#32812 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35646-followup.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cleanup unreachable code.
### Why are the changes needed?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existed test.
Closes#32791 from pan3793/cleanup.
Authored-by: Cheng Pan <379377944@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch uses the "concurrency" syntax to replace the "cancel job" workflow:
- .github/workflows/benchmark.yml
- .github/workflows/labeler.yml
- .github/workflows/notify_test_workflow.yml
- .github/workflows/test_report.yml
Remove the .github/workflows/cancel_duplicate_workflow_runs.yml
Note that the push/schedule based job are not changed to keep the same config in a4b70758d3:
- .github/workflows/build_and_test.yml
- .github/workflows/publish_snapshot.yml
- .github/workflows/stale.yml
- .github/workflows/update_build_status.yml
### Why are the changes needed?
We are using [cancel_duplicate_workflow_runs](a70e66ecfa/.github/workflows/cancel_duplicate_workflow_runs.yml (L1)) job to cancel previous jobs when a new job is queued. Now, it has been supported by the github action by using ["concurrency"](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#concurrency) syntax to make sure only a single job or workflow using the same concurrency group.
Related: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10416 and https://github.com/potiuk/cancel-workflow-runs
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
triger the PR manaully
Closes#32806 from Yikun/SPARK-X.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduces `InternalField` to manage dtypes and `StructField`s.
`InternalFrame` is already managing dtypes, but when it checks the Spark's data types, column names, and nullabilities, it tries to run the analysis phase each time it needs, which will cause a performance issue.
It will use `InternalField` class which stores the retrieved Spark's data types, column names, and nullabilities, and reuse them. Also, in case those can be known, just update and reuse them without asking Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently there are some performance issues in the pandas-on-Spark layer.
One of them is accessing Java DataFrame and run analysis phase too many times, especially just for retrieving the current column names or data types.
We should reduce the amount of unnecessary access.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Improves the performance in pandas-on-Spark layer:
```py
df = ps.read_parquet("/path/to/test.parquet") # contains ~75 columns
df = df[(df["col"] > 0) & (df["col"] < 10000)]
```
Before the PR, it took about **2.15 sec** and after **1.15 sec**.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32775 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35638/field.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Introduce BooleanExtensionOps in order to make boolean operators `and` and `or` data-type-based.
- Improve error messages for operators `and` and `or`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Boolean operators __and__, __or__, __rand__, and __ror__ should be data-type-based
BooleanExtensionDtypes processes these boolean operators differently from bool, so BooleanExtensionOps is introduced.
These boolean operators themselves are also bitwise operators, which should be able to apply to other data types classes later. However, this is not the goal of this PR.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Error messages for operators `and` and `or` are improved.
Before:
```
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, "x", "y"], dtype="category")
>>> psser | True
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(`0` OR true)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(`0` OR true)' (tinyint and boolean).;
'Project [unresolvedalias(CASE WHEN (isnull(0#9) OR isnull((0#9 OR true))) THEN false ELSE (0#9 OR true) END, Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1442/17254916406fb8afba))]
+- Project [__index_level_0__#8L, 0#9, monotonically_increasing_id() AS __natural_order__#12L]
+- LogicalRDD [__index_level_0__#8L, 0#9], false
```
After:
```
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, "x", "y"], dtype="category")
>>> psser | True
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Bitwise or can not be applied to categoricals.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32698 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_extension.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make the conversion from/to pandas (for non-ExtensionDtype) data-type-based.
NOTE: Ops class per ExtensionDtype and its data-type-based from/to pandas will be implemented in a separate PR as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35614.
### Why are the changes needed?
The conversion from/to pandas includes logic for checking data types and behaving accordingly.
That makes code hard to change or maintain.
Since we have introduced the Ops class per non-ExtensionDtype data type, we ought to make the conversion from/to pandas data-type-based for non-ExtensionDtypes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32592 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_pd_conversion.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently spark.jars.xxx property keys (e.g. spark.jars.ivySettings and spark.jars.packages) are hardcoded in multiple places within Spark code across multiple modules. We should define them in config/package.scala and reference them in all other places.
### Why are the changes needed?
improvement
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
no
Closes#32746 from dgd-contributor/SPARK-35074_configs_should_be_moved_to_config_package.scala.
Authored-by: dgd-contributor <dgd_contributor@viettel.com.vn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extend Catalyst's type system by a new type that conforms to the SQL standard (see SQL:2016, section 4.6.2): TimestampWithoutTZType represents the timestamp without time zone type
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark SQL today supports the TIMESTAMP data type. However the semantics provided actually match TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIMEZONE as defined by Oracle. Timestamps embedded in a SQL query or passed through JDBC are presumed to be in session local timezone and cast to UTC before being processed.
These are desirable semantics in many cases, such as when dealing with calendars.
In many (more) other cases, such as when dealing with log files it is desirable that the provided timestamps not be altered.
SQL users expect that they can model either behavior and do so by using TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE for time zone insensitive data and TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE for time zone sensitive data.
Most traditional RDBMS map TIMESTAMP to TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE and will be surprised to see TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE, a feature that does not exist in the standard.
In this new feature, we will introduce TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIMEZONE to describe the existing timestamp type and add TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE for standard semantic.
Using these two types will provide clarity.
This is a starting PR. See more details in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35662
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, a new data type for Timestamp without time zone type. It is still in development.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#32802 from gengliangwang/TimestampNTZType.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `BlockManagerMasterEndpoint` for the disk persisted RDDs (when `spark.shuffle.service.fetch.rdd.enable` is enabled) we are keeping track the block status entries by external shuffle service instances (so on YARN we are basically keeping them by nodes). This is the `blockStatusByShuffleService` member val. And when all the RDD blocks are removed for one external shuffle service instance then the key and the empty map can be removed from `blockStatusByShuffleService`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It is a small leak and I was asked to take care of it in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32114#discussion_r640270377.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually by adding a temporary log line to check `blockStatusByShuffleService` value before and after the `removeRdd` and run the `SPARK-25888: using external shuffle service fetching disk persisted blocks` test in `ExternalShuffleServiceSuite`.
Closes#32790 from attilapiros/SPARK-35543.
Authored-by: attilapiros <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: attilapiros <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's a long-standing bug that we forgot to resolve `UnresolvedAlias` in `CollectMetrics`. It's a bit hard to trigger this bug before 3.2 as most likely people won't create `UnresolvedAlias` when calling `Dataset.observe`. However things have been changed after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30974
This PR proposes to handle `CollectMetrics` in the rule `ResolveAliases`.
### Why are the changes needed?
bug fix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
updated test
Closes#32803 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to change from:
to:
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas APIs on Spark (pandas on Spark) is a package in PySpark in the end. So it has to be documented in the same level with other packages (e.g., Spark SQL).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it changes the structure of the docs. To end users, no as it's only in development branch.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested as above.
Closes#32799 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35646.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to upgrade kubernetes-client to 5.4.1.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will bring a few bug fixes.
- https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/releases/tag/v5.4.1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Closes#32798 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-35660.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, for huber, make it support virtual centering
2, for `LeastSquares`, it was impled in this way: optimize the linear part and then estimate the intercept. So just re-org the its agg and suite to keep in line with other aggs.
### Why are the changes needed?
for better convergence
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing and newly added testsuites
Closes#32759 from zhengruifeng/refactor_huber_agg.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove unaccessible code path
### Why are the changes needed?
for succinctness
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuite
Closes#32765 from zhengruifeng/spark_35100_followup.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust the `check_exact` parameter for non-numeric columns to ensure pandas-on-Spark tests passed with all pandas versions.
### Why are the changes needed?
`pd.testing` utils are utilized in pandas-on-Spark tests.
Due to https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/35446, `check_exact=True` for non-numeric columns doesn't work for older pd.testing utils, e.g. `assert_series_equal`. We wanted to adjust that to ensure pandas-on-Spark tests pass for all pandas versions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#32772 from xinrong-databricks/test_util.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes applying `black` to pandas API on Spark codes, for improving static analysis.
By executing the `./dev/reformat-python` in the spark home directory, all the code of the pandas API on Spark is fixed according to the static analysis rules.
### Why are the changes needed?
This can be reduces the cost of static analysis during development.
It has been used continuously for about a year in the Koalas project and its convenience has been proven.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually reformat the pandas API on Spark codes by running the `./dev/reformat-python`, and checked the `./dev/lint-python` is passed.
Closes#32779 from itholic/SPARK-35499.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to change `DiskBlockManager` like the following to allow `ShuffleDataIO` to decide the behavior of shuffle file deletion.
```scala
- private[spark] class DiskBlockManager(conf: SparkConf, deleteFilesOnStop: Boolean)
+ private[spark] class DiskBlockManager(conf: SparkConf, var deleteFilesOnStop: Boolean)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
`SparkContext` creates
1. `SparkEnv` (with `BlockManager` and its `DiskBlockManager`)
2. loads `ShuffleDataIO`
3. initialize block manager.
```scala
_env = createSparkEnv(_conf, isLocal, listenerBus)
...
_shuffleDriverComponents = ShuffleDataIOUtils.loadShuffleDataIO(config).driver()
_shuffleDriverComponents.initializeApplication().asScala.foreach { case (k, v) =>
_conf.set(ShuffleDataIOUtils.SHUFFLE_SPARK_CONF_PREFIX + k, v)
}
...
_env.blockManager.initialize(_applicationId)
...
```
`DiskBlockManager` is created first at `BlockManager` constructor and we cannot change `deleteFilesOnStop` later at `ShuffleDataIO`. By switching to `var`, we can implement enhanced shuffle data management feature via `ShuffleDataIO` like https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32730 .
```
val diskBlockManager = {
// Only perform cleanup if an external service is not serving our shuffle files.
val deleteFilesOnStop =
!externalShuffleServiceEnabled || executorId == SparkContext.DRIVER_IDENTIFIER
new DiskBlockManager(conf, deleteFilesOnStop)
}
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a private class.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#32784 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-35654.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to upgrade SBT to 1.5.3.
### Why are the changes needed?
This release seems to include a bug fix for Scala 2.13.6+ and Scala 3.
https://github.com/sbt/sbt/releases/tag/v1.5.3
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
GA.
Closes#32792 from sarutak/upgrade-sbt-1.5.3.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Optimizes the retrieval of approximate quantiles for an array of percentiles.
* Adds an overload for QuantileSummaries.query that accepts an array of percentiles and optimizes the computation to do a single pass over the sketch and avoid redundant computation.
* Modifies the ApproximatePercentiles operator to call into the new method.
All formatting changes are the result of running ./dev/scalafmt
### Why are the changes needed?
The existing implementation does repeated calls per input percentile resulting in redundant computation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests for the new method.
Closes#32700 from alkispoly-db/spark_35558_approx_quants_array.
Authored-by: Alkis Polyzotis <alkis.polyzotis@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR upgrades HtmlUnit and its related artifacts to `2.50`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We currently uses 2.40 but 2.41+ seem to include bunch of bug fixes and improvements especially for JavaScript and CSS.
https://htmlunit.sourceforge.io/changes-report.html#a2.50.0
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
All the `UISeleniumSuite` which use HtmlUnit pass on my laptop.
Closes#32789 from sarutak/upgrade-htmlunit250.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Override `getJDBCType` method in `MySQLDialect` so that `FloatType` is mapped to `FLOAT` instead of `REAL`
### Why are the changes needed?
MySQL treats `REAL` as a synonym to `DOUBLE` by default (see https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/numeric-types.html). Therefore, when creating a table with a column of `REAL` type, it will be created as `DOUBLE`. However, currently, `MySQLDialect` does not provide an implementation for `getJDBCType`, and will thus ultimately fall back to `JdbcUtils.getCommonJDBCType`, which maps `FloatType` to `REAL`. This change is needed so that we can properly map the `FloatType` to `FLOAT` for MySQL.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Prior to this PR, when writing a dataframe with a `FloatType` column to a MySQL table, it will create a `DOUBLE` column. After the PR, it will create a `FLOAT` column.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case in `JDBCSuite` that verifies the mapping.
Closes#32605 from mariosmeim-db/SPARK-35446.
Authored-by: Marios Meimaris <marios.meimaris@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In functions.py, there is a function added `def column(col)`. There is also another method in the same file `def col(col)`. This leads to some ambiguity on whether the parameter is being referred to or the function. In pyspark 3.1.2, this leads to `TypeError: 'str' object is not callable` when the function `column(col)` is called - the highest preference is given to the string variable in scope as opposed to the function `col `in the file as intended.
This PR fixes that ambiguity by changing the variable name to `col_like`. I have filed this as an issue on JIRA here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35643.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pyspark 3.1.2, we see `TypeError: 'str' object is not callable` when `column()` function is called. This Pr fixes that error.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
I don't believe this patch needs additional testing.
Closes#32771 from keerthanvasist/col.
Lead-authored-by: Keerthan Vasist <kvasist@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: keerthanvasist <kvasist@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new config that controls the timeout of waiting for driver pod's readiness before allocating executor pods. This wait only happens once on application start.
### Why are the changes needed?
The driver's headless service can be resolved by DNS only after the driver pod is ready. If the executor tries to connect to the headless service before driver pod is ready, it will hit UnkownHostException and get into error state but will not be restarted. **This case usually happens when the driver pod has sidecar containers but hasn't finished their creation when executors start.** So basically there is a race condition. This issue can be mitigated by tweaking this config.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
A new config `spark.kubernetes.allocation.driver.readinessTimeout` added.
### How was this patch tested?
Exisiting tests.
Closes#32752 from cchriswu/SPARK-32975-fix.
Lead-authored-by: Chris Wu <wucaowei19@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Wu <wcaowei@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup for 345d35ed1a, in this PR we support CURRENT_USER without tailing parentheses in default mode. And for ANSI mode, we can only use CURRENT_USER without tailing parentheses because it is a reserved keyword that cannot be used as a function name
### Why are the changes needed?
1. make it the same as current_date/current_timestamp
2. better ANSI compliance
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no, just a followup
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#32770 from yaooqinn/SPARK-21957-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the `UnsupportedOperationException` described in [PR#32705](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32705).
When AQE and DPP are turned on at the same time, because the `BroadcastExchange` included in the DPP filter is not added through `EnsureRequirement` rule, Therefore, when AQE optimizes the DPP filter, there is no way to add `BroadcastExchange` through the `EnsureRequirement` rule in `reOptimize` method, which eventually leads to the loss of `BroadcastExchange` in the final physical plan. This PR adds `BroadcastExchange` node in the `reOptimize` method if the current plan is DPP filter.
### Why are the changes needed?
bug fix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
adding new ut
Closes#32741 from JkSelf/fixDPP+AQEbug.
Authored-by: Ke Jia <ke.a.jia@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
