Commit graph

4452 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gatorsmile 44cc4daf3a [SPARK-23195][SQL] Keep the Hint of Cached Data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The broadcast hint of the cached plan is lost if we cache the plan. This PR is to correct it.

```Scala
  val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "4"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
  val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "1"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
  broadcast(df2).cache()
  df2.collect()
  val df3 = df1.join(df2, Seq("key"), "inner")
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added a test.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20368 from gatorsmile/cachedBroadcastHint.
2018-01-23 16:17:09 -08:00
gatorsmile 613c290336 [SPARK-23192][SQL] Keep the Hint after Using Cached Data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The hint of the plan segment is lost, if the plan segment is replaced by the cached data.

```Scala
      val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "4"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
      val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "1"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
      df2.cache()
      val df3 = df1.join(broadcast(df2), Seq("key"), "inner")
```

This PR is to fix it.

## How was this patch tested?
Added a test

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20365 from gatorsmile/fixBroadcastHintloss.
2018-01-23 14:56:28 -08:00
gatorsmile ee572ba8c1 [SPARK-20749][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Override prettyName for bit_length and octet_length
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We need to override the prettyName for bit_length and octet_length for getting the expected auto-generated alias name.

## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20358 from gatorsmile/test2.3More.
2018-01-23 21:36:20 +09:00
Li Jin b2ce17b4c9 [SPARK-22274][PYTHON][SQL] User-defined aggregation functions with pandas udf (full shuffle)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add support for using pandas UDFs with groupby().agg().

This PR introduces a new type of pandas UDF - group aggregate pandas UDF. This type of UDF defines a transformation of multiple pandas Series -> a scalar value. Group aggregate pandas UDFs can be used with groupby().agg(). Note group aggregate pandas UDF doesn't support partial aggregation, i.e., a full shuffle is required.

This PR doesn't support group aggregate pandas UDFs that return ArrayType, StructType or MapType. Support for these types is left for future PR.

## How was this patch tested?

GroupbyAggPandasUDFTests

Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>

Closes #19872 from icexelloss/SPARK-22274-groupby-agg.
2018-01-23 14:11:30 +09:00
Wenchen Fan 51eb750263 [SPARK-22389][SQL] data source v2 partitioning reporting interface
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

a new interface which allows data source to report partitioning and avoid shuffle at Spark side.

The design is pretty like the internal distribution/partitioing framework. Spark defines a `Distribution` interfaces and several concrete implementations, and ask the data source to report a `Partitioning`, the `Partitioning` should tell Spark if it can satisfy a `Distribution` or not.

## How was this patch tested?

new test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20201 from cloud-fan/partition-reporting.
2018-01-22 15:21:09 -08:00
Jacek Laskowski 76b8b840dd [MINOR] Typo fixes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Typo fixes

## How was this patch tested?

Local build / Doc-only changes

Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>

Closes #20344 from jaceklaskowski/typo-fixes.
2018-01-22 13:55:14 -06:00
Wenchen Fan 5d680cae48 [SPARK-23090][SQL] polish ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Several improvements:
* provide a default implementation for the batch get methods
* rename `getChildColumn` to `getChild`, which is more concise
* remove `getStruct(int, int)`, it's only used to simplify the codegen, which is an internal thing, we should not add a public API for this purpose.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20277 from cloud-fan/column-vector.
2018-01-22 20:56:38 +08:00
gatorsmile 896e45af5f [MINOR][SQL][TEST] Test case cleanups for recent PRs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revert the unneeded test case changes we made in SPARK-23000

Also fixes the test suites that do not call `super.afterAll()` in the local `afterAll`. The `afterAll()` of `TestHiveSingleton` actually reset the environments.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20341 from gatorsmile/testRelated.
2018-01-22 04:32:59 -08:00
gatorsmile 78801881c4 [SPARK-23170][SQL] Dump the statistics of effective runs of analyzer and optimizer rules
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Dump the statistics of effective runs of analyzer and optimizer rules.

## How was this patch tested?

Do a manual run of TPCDSQuerySuite

```
=== Metrics of Analyzer/Optimizer Rules ===
Total number of runs: 175899
Total time: 25.486559948 seconds

Rule                                                                                               Effective Time / Total Time                     Effective Runs / Total Runs

org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ColumnPruning                                              1603280450 / 2868461549                         761 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$CTESubstitution                                    2045860009 / 2056602674                         37 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveAggregateFunctions                          440719059 / 1693110949                          38 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.Optimizer$OptimizeSubqueries                               1429834919 / 1446016225                         39 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PruneFilters                                               33273083 / 1389586938                           3 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveReferences                                  821183615 / 1266668754                          616 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin                                                775837028 / 866238225                           132 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.DecimalPrecision                                            550683593 / 748854507                           211 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveSubquery                                    513075345 / 634370596                           49 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$FixNullability                                     33475731 / 606406532                            12 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$ImplicitTypeCasts                              193144298 / 545403925                           86 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.BooleanSimplification                                      18651497 / 495725004                            7 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PushPredicateThroughJoin                                   369257217 / 489934378                           709 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveRedundantAliases                                     3707000 / 468291609                             9 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.InferFiltersFromConstraints                                410155900 / 435254175                           192 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FindDataSourceTable                                     348885539 / 371855866                           233 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.NullPropagation                                            11307645 / 307531225                            26 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveFunctions                                   120324545 / 304948785                           294 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$FunctionArgumentConversion                     92323199 / 286695007                            38 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PushDownPredicate                                          230084193 / 265845972                           785 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$PromoteStrings                                 45938401 / 265144009                            40 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$InConversion                                   14888776 / 261499450                            1 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$CaseWhenCoercion                               113796384 / 244913861                           29 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConstantFolding                                            65008069 / 236548480                            126 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ExtractGenerator                                   0 / 226338929                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveTimeZone                                             98134906 / 221323770                            417 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderAssociativeOperator                                 0 / 208421703                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.OptimizeIn                                                 8762534 / 199351958                             16 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$DateTimeOperations                             11980016 / 190779046                            27 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyBinaryComparison                                   0 / 188887385                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyConditionals                                       0 / 186812106                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCaseConversionExpressions                          0 / 183885230                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCasts                                              17128295 / 182901910                            69 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$Division                                       14579110 / 180309340                            8 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$BooleanEquality                                0 / 176740516                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$IfCoercion                                     0 / 170781986                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.LikeSimplification                                         771605 / 164136736                              1 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveDispensableExpressions                               0 / 155958962                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveCreateNamedStruct                                    0 / 151222943                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveWindowOrder                                 7534632 / 146596355                             14 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$EltCoercion                                    0 / 144488654                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$ConcatCoercion                                 0 / 142403338                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveWindowFrame                                 12067635 / 141500665                            21 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TimeWindowing                                               0 / 140431958                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$WindowFrameCoercion                            0 / 125471960                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateOuterJoin                                         14226972 / 124922019                            11 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$StackCoercion                                  0 / 123613887                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery                            8491071 / 121179056                             7 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveGroupingAnalytics                           55526073 / 120290529                            11 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConstantPropagation                                        0 / 113886790                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveDeserializer                                52383759 / 107160222                            148 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CleanupAliases                                              52543524 / 102091518                            344 / 1086
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveRedundantProject                                     40682895 / 94403652                             342 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ExtractWindowExpressions                           38473816 / 89740578                             23 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseProject                                            46806090 / 83315506                             281 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.FoldablePropagation                                        0 / 78750087                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveAliases                                     13742765 / 77227258                             47 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineFilters                                             53386729 / 76960344                             448 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis                                      68034341 / 75724186                             24 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$LookupFunctions                                    0 / 71151084                                    0 / 750
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveMissingReferences                           12139848 / 67599140                             8 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PullupCorrelatedPredicates                                 45017938 / 65968777                             23 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.v2.PushDownOperatorsToDataSource                        0 / 60937767                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseRepartition                                        0 / 59897237                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PushProjectionThroughUnion                                 8547262 / 53941370                              10 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$HandleNullInputsForUDF                             0 / 52735976                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$WidenSetOperationTypes                         9797713 / 52401665                              9 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$PullOutNondeterministic                            0 / 51741500                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations                                   28614911 / 51061186                             233 / 1990
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.PruneFileSourcePartitions                               0 / 50621510                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineUnions                                              2777800 / 50262112                              17 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$GlobalAggregates                                   1640641 / 49633909                              46 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.DecimalAggregates                                          20198374 / 48488419                             100 / 385
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.LimitPushDown                                              0 / 45052523                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineLimits                                              0 / 44719443                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateSorts                                             0 / 44216930                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewritePredicateSubquery                                   36235699 / 44165786                             148 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveNewInstance                                 0 / 42750307                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast                                      0 / 41811748                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveOrdinalInOrderByAndGroupBy                  3819476 / 41776562                              4 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ComputeCurrentTime                                         0 / 40527808                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseWindow                                             0 / 36832538                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateSerialization                                     0 / 36120667                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveAggAliasInGroupBy                           0 / 32435826                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.PreprocessTableCreation                                 0 / 32145218                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.ResolveSQLOnFile                                        0 / 30295614                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolvePivot                                       0 / 30111655                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.package$ExpressionCanonicalizer$CleanExpressions 59930 / 28038201                                26 / 8280
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveInlineTables                                         0 / 27808108                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveSubqueryColumnAliases                       0 / 27066690                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveGenerate                                    0 / 26660210                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveNaturalAndUsingJoin                         0 / 25255184                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveTableValuedFunctions                                 0 / 24663088                                    0 / 1990
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.SubstituteUnresolvedOrdinals                                9709079 / 24450670                              4 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveHints$ResolveBroadcastHints                          0 / 23776535                                    0 / 750
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceExpressions                                         0 / 22697895                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CheckCartesianProducts                                     0 / 22523798                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceDistinctWithAggregate                               988593 / 21535410                               15 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateMapObjects                                        0 / 20269996                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteDistinctAggregates                                  0 / 19388592                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateSubqueryAliases                                    17675532 / 18971185                             215 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.GetCurrentDatabase                                         0 / 18271152                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PropagateEmptyRelation                                     2077097 / 17190855                              3 / 288
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateBarriers                                           0 / 16736359                                    0 / 1086
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery                                           0 / 16669341                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.UpdateOuterReferences                                       0 / 14470235                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceExceptWithAntiJoin                                  6715625 / 12190561                              1 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceIntersectWithSemiJoin                               3451793 / 11431432                              7 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFFromAggregate                                0 / 10810568                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions                       344198 / 10475276                               1 / 286
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$WindowsSubstitution                                0 / 10386630                                    0 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateUnions                                             0 / 10096526                                    0 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.AliasViewChild                                              0 / 9991706                                     0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConvertToLocalRelation                                     0 / 9649334                                     0 / 288
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveHints$RemoveAllHints                                 0 / 8739109                                     0 / 750
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.PreprocessTableInsertion                                0 / 8420889                                     0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateView                                               0 / 8319134                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions                          0 / 7392627                                     0 / 286
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceExceptWithFilter                                    0 / 7170516                                     0 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCreateArrayOps                                     0 / 7109643                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCreateStructOps                                    0 / 6837590                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCreateMapOps                                       0 / 6617848                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineConcats                                             0 / 5768406                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate                            0 / 5349831                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineTypedFilters                                        0 / 5186642                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateDistinct                                          0 / 2427686                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CostBasedJoinReorder                                       0 / 2420436                                     0 / 285

```

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20342 from gatorsmile/reportExecution.
2018-01-22 04:31:24 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 8142a3b883 [MINOR][SQL] Fix wrong comments on org.apache.spark.sql.parquet.row.attributes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes the wrong comment on `org.apache.spark.sql.parquet.row.attributes`
which is useful for UDTs like Vector/Matrix. Please see [SPARK-22320](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22320) for the usage.

Originally, [SPARK-19411](bf493686eb (diff-ee26d4c4be21e92e92a02e9f16dbc285L314)) left this behind during removing optional column metadatas. In the same PR, the same comment was removed at line 310-311.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A (This is about comments).

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20346 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_comment_parquet.
2018-01-22 15:18:57 +09:00
Marco Gaido 121dc96f08 [SPARK-23087][SQL] CheckCartesianProduct too restrictive when condition is false/null
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

CheckCartesianProduct raises an AnalysisException also when the join condition is always false/null. In this case, we shouldn't raise it, since the result will not be a cartesian product.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20333 from mgaido91/SPARK-23087.
2018-01-20 22:39:49 -08:00
fjh100456 00d169156d [SPARK-21786][SQL] The 'spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec' and 'spark.sql.orc.compression.codec' configuration doesn't take effect on hive table writing
[SPARK-21786][SQL] The 'spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec' and 'spark.sql.orc.compression.codec' configuration doesn't take effect on hive table writing

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Pass ‘spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec’ value to ‘parquet.compression’.
Pass ‘spark.sql.orc.compression.codec’ value to ‘orc.compress’.

How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Note:
This is the same issue mentioned in #19218 . That branch was deleted mistakenly, so make a new pr instead.

gatorsmile maropu dongjoon-hyun discipleforteen

Author: fjh100456 <fu.jinhua6@zte.com.cn>
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: Yinan Li <liyinan926@gmail.com>
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Author: Gera Shegalov <gera@apache.org>
Author: chetkhatri <ckhatrimanjal@gmail.com>
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Author: Bago Amirbekian <bago@databricks.com>
Author: Xianjin YE <advancedxy@gmail.com>
Author: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Author: zuotingbing <zuo.tingbing9@zte.com.cn>
Author: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: Adrian Ionescu <adrian@databricks.com>

Closes #20087 from fjh100456/HiveTableWriting.
2018-01-20 14:49:49 -08:00
Sean Owen 396cdfbea4 [SPARK-23091][ML] Incorrect unit test for approxQuantile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Narrow bound on approx quantile test to epsilon from 2*epsilon to match paper

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>

Closes #20324 from srowen/SPARK-23091.
2018-01-19 22:46:34 -08:00
Wenchen Fan d8aaa771e2 [SPARK-23149][SQL] polish ColumnarBatch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Several cleanups in `ColumnarBatch`
* remove `schema`. The `ColumnVector`s inside `ColumnarBatch` already have the data type information, we don't need this `schema`.
* remove `capacity`. `ColumnarBatch` is just a wrapper of `ColumnVector`s, not builders, it doesn't need a capacity property.
* remove `DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE`. As a wrapper, `ColumnarBatch` can't decide the batch size, it should be decided by the reader, e.g. parquet reader, orc reader, cached table reader. The default batch size should also be defined by the reader.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20316 from cloud-fan/columnar-batch.
2018-01-19 08:58:21 -08:00
gatorsmile 6c39654efc [SPARK-23000][TEST] Keep Derby DB Location Unchanged After Session Cloning
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After session cloning in `TestHive`, the conf of the singleton SparkContext for derby DB location is changed to a new directory. The new directory is created in `HiveUtils.newTemporaryConfiguration(useInMemoryDerby = false)`.

This PR is to keep the conf value of `ConfVars.METASTORECONNECTURLKEY.varname` unchanged during the session clone.

## How was this patch tested?
The issue can be reproduced by the command:
> build/sbt -Phive "hive/test-only org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSessionStateSuite org.apache.spark.sql.hive.DataSourceWithHiveMetastoreCatalogSuite"

Also added a test case.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20328 from gatorsmile/fixTestFailure.
2018-01-19 22:47:18 +08:00
Sameer Agarwal 9c4b99861c [BUILD][MINOR] Fix java style check issues
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch fixes a few recently introduced java style check errors in master and release branch.

As an aside, given that [java linting currently fails](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10763
) on machines with a clean maven cache, it'd be great to find another workaround to [re-enable the java style checks](3a07eff5af/dev/run-tests.py (L577)) as part of Spark PRB.

/cc zsxwing JoshRosen srowen for any suggestions

## How was this patch tested?

Manual Check

Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameerag@apache.org>

Closes #20323 from sameeragarwal/java.
2018-01-19 01:38:08 -08:00
Takuya UESHIN 568055da93 [SPARK-23054][SQL][PYSPARK][FOLLOWUP] Use sqlType casting when casting PythonUserDefinedType to String.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #20246.

If a UDT in Python doesn't have its corresponding Scala UDT, cast to string will be the raw string of the internal value, e.g. `"org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeArrayDataxxxxxxxx"` if the internal type is `ArrayType`.

This pr fixes it by using its `sqlType` casting.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a test and existing tests.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>

Closes #20306 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23054/fup1.
2018-01-19 11:37:08 +08:00
Tathagata Das bf34d665b9 [SPARK-23144][SS] Added console sink for continuous processing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactored ConsoleWriter into ConsoleMicrobatchWriter and ConsoleContinuousWriter.

## How was this patch tested?
new unit test

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20311 from tdas/SPARK-23144.
2018-01-18 12:33:39 -08:00
Marco Gaido e28eb43114 [SPARK-22036][SQL] Decimal multiplication with high precision/scale often returns NULL
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When there is an operation between Decimals and the result is a number which is not representable exactly with the result's precision and scale, Spark is returning `NULL`. This was done to reflect Hive's behavior, but it is against SQL ANSI 2011, which states that "If the result cannot be represented exactly in the result type, then whether it is rounded or truncated is implementation-defined". Moreover, Hive now changed its behavior in order to respect the standard, thanks to HIVE-15331.

Therefore, the PR propose to:
 - update the rules to determine the result precision and scale according to the new Hive's ones introduces in HIVE-15331;
 - round the result of the operations, when it is not representable exactly with the result's precision and scale, instead of returning `NULL`
 - introduce a new config `spark.sql.decimalOperations.allowPrecisionLoss` which default to `true` (ie. the new behavior) in order to allow users to switch back to the previous one.

Hive behavior reflects SQLServer's one. The only difference is that the precision and scale are adjusted for all the arithmetic operations in Hive, while SQL Server is said to do so only for multiplications and divisions in the documentation. This PR follows Hive's behavior.

A more detailed explanation is available here: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-dev/201712.mbox/%3CCAEorWNAJ4TxJR9NBcgSFMD_VxTg8qVxusjP%2BAJP-x%2BJV9zH-yA%40mail.gmail.com%3E.

## How was this patch tested?

modified and added UTs. Comparisons with results of Hive and SQLServer.

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20023 from mgaido91/SPARK-22036.
2018-01-18 21:24:39 +08:00
Jose Torres 1c76a91e5f [SPARK-23052][SS] Migrate ConsoleSink to data source V2 api.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Migrate ConsoleSink to data source V2 api.

Note that this includes a missing piece in DataStreamWriter required to specify a data source V2 writer.

Note also that I've removed the "Rerun batch" part of the sink, because as far as I can tell this would never have actually happened. A MicroBatchExecution object will only commit each batch once for its lifetime, and a new MicroBatchExecution object would have a new ConsoleSink object which doesn't know it's retrying a batch. So I think this represents an anti-feature rather than a weakness in the V2 API.

## How was this patch tested?

new unit test

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20243 from jose-torres/console-sink.
2018-01-17 22:36:29 -08:00
Xiayun Sun 0219470206 [SPARK-21996][SQL] read files with space in name for streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Structured streaming is now able to read files with space in file name (previously it would skip the file and output a warning)

## How was this patch tested?

Added new unit test.

Author: Xiayun Sun <xiayunsun@gmail.com>

Closes #19247 from xysun/SPARK-21996.
2018-01-17 16:42:38 -08:00
Tathagata Das bac0d661af [SPARK-23119][SS] Minor fixes to V2 streaming APIs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Added `InterfaceStability.Evolving` annotations
- Improved docs.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20286 from tdas/SPARK-23119.
2018-01-17 16:40:02 -08:00
Li Jin 4e6f8fb150 [SPARK-23047][PYTHON][SQL] Change MapVector to NullableMapVector in ArrowColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes usage of `MapVector` in Spark codebase to use `NullableMapVector`.

`MapVector` is an internal Arrow class that is not supposed to be used directly. We should use `NullableMapVector` instead.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing test.

Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>

Closes #20239 from icexelloss/arrow-map-vector.
2018-01-18 07:26:43 +09:00
Jose Torres e946c63dd5 [SPARK-23093][SS] Don't change run id when reconfiguring a continuous processing query.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Keep the run ID static, using a different ID for the epoch coordinator to avoid cross-execution message contamination.

## How was this patch tested?

new and existing unit tests

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20282 from jose-torres/fix-runid.
2018-01-17 13:58:44 -08:00
Jose Torres 86a8450318 [SPARK-23033][SS] Don't use task level retry for continuous processing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Continuous processing tasks will fail on any attempt number greater than 0. ContinuousExecution will catch these failures and restart globally from the last recorded checkpoints.
## How was this patch tested?
unit test

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20225 from jose-torres/no-retry.
2018-01-17 13:52:51 -08:00
Wang Gengliang 8598a982b4 [SPARK-23079][SQL] Fix query constraints propagation with aliases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Previously, PR #19201 fix the problem of non-converging constraints.
After that PR #19149 improve the loop and constraints is inferred only once.
So the problem of non-converging constraints is gone.

However, the case below will fail.

```

spark.range(5).write.saveAsTable("t")
val t = spark.read.table("t")
val left = t.withColumn("xid", $"id" + lit(1)).as("x")
val right = t.withColumnRenamed("id", "xid").as("y")
val df = left.join(right, "xid").filter("id = 3").toDF()
checkAnswer(df, Row(4, 3))

```

Because `aliasMap` replace all the aliased child. See the test case in PR for details.

This PR is to fix this bug by removing useless code for preventing non-converging constraints.
It can be also fixed with #20270, but this is much simpler and clean up the code.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>

Closes #20278 from gengliangwang/FixConstraintSimple.
2018-01-18 00:05:26 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 0f8a28617a [SPARK-21783][SQL] Turn on ORC filter push-down by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

ORC filter push-down is disabled by default from the beginning, [SPARK-2883](aa31e431fc (diff-41ef65b9ef5b518f77e2a03559893f4dR149)
).

Now, Apache Spark starts to depend on Apache ORC 1.4.1. For Apache Spark 2.3, this PR turns on ORC filter push-down by default like Parquet ([SPARK-9207](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21783)) as a part of [SPARK-20901](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20901), "Feature parity for ORC with Parquet".

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the existing tests.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20265 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-21783.
2018-01-17 21:53:36 +08:00
Henry Robinson 1f3d933e0b [SPARK-23062][SQL] Improve EXCEPT documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make the default behavior of EXCEPT (i.e. EXCEPT DISTINCT) more
explicit in the documentation, and call out the change in behavior
from 1.x.

Author: Henry Robinson <henry@cloudera.com>

Closes #20254 from henryr/spark-23062.
2018-01-17 16:01:41 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun a0aedb0ded [SPARK-23072][SQL][TEST] Add a Unicode schema test for file-based data sources
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

After [SPARK-20682](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19651), Apache Spark 2.3 is able to read ORC files with Unicode schema. Previously, it raises `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException`.

This PR adds a Unicode schema test for CSV/JSON/ORC/Parquet file-based data sources. Note that TEXT data source only has [a single column with a fixed name 'value'](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/text/TextFileFormat.scala#L71).

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the newly added test case.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20266 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23072.
2018-01-17 14:32:18 +08:00
Jose Torres 1667057851 [SPARK-22908][SS] Roll forward continuous processing Kafka support with fix to continuous Kafka data reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The Kafka reader is now interruptible and can close itself.
## How was this patch tested?

I locally ran one of the ContinuousKafkaSourceSuite tests in a tight loop. Before the fix, my machine ran out of open file descriptors a few iterations in; now it works fine.

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20253 from jose-torres/fix-data-reader.
2018-01-16 18:11:27 -08:00
Gabor Somogyi a9b845ebb5 [SPARK-22361][SQL][TEST] Add unit test for Window Frames
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There are already quite a few integration tests using window frames, but the unit tests coverage is not ideal.

In this PR the already existing tests are reorganized, extended and where gaps found additional cases added.

## How was this patch tested?

Automated: Pass the Jenkins.

Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>

Closes #20019 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-22361.
2018-01-17 10:03:25 +08:00
Dilip Biswal 0c2ba427bc [SPARK-23095][SQL] Decorrelation of scalar subquery fails with java.util.NoSuchElementException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following SQL involving scalar correlated query returns a map exception.
``` SQL
SELECT t1a
FROM   t1
WHERE  t1a = (SELECT   count(*)
              FROM     t2
              WHERE    t2c = t1c
              HAVING   count(*) >= 1)
```
``` SQL
key not found: ExprId(278,786682bb-41f9-4bd5-a397-928272cc8e4e)
java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: ExprId(278,786682bb-41f9-4bd5-a397-928272cc8e4e)
        at scala.collection.MapLike$class.default(MapLike.scala:228)
        at scala.collection.AbstractMap.default(Map.scala:59)
        at scala.collection.MapLike$class.apply(MapLike.scala:141)
        at scala.collection.AbstractMap.apply(Map.scala:59)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery$.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$optimizer$RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery$$evalSubqueryOnZeroTups(subquery.scala:378)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$optimizer$RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery$$constructLeftJoins$1.apply(subquery.scala:430)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$optimizer$RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery$$constructLeftJoins$1.apply(subquery.scala:426)
```

In this case, after evaluating the HAVING clause "count(*) > 1" statically
against the binding of aggregtation result on empty input, we determine
that this query will not have a the count bug. We should simply return
the evalSubqueryOnZeroTups with empty value.
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)

## How was this patch tested?
A new test was added in the Subquery bucket.

Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>

Closes #20283 from dilipbiswal/scalar-count-defect.
2018-01-17 09:57:30 +08:00
Gabor Somogyi 12db365b4f [SPARK-16139][TEST] Add logging functionality for leaked threads in tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Lots of our tests don't properly shutdown everything they create, and end up leaking lots of threads. For example, `TaskSetManagerSuite` doesn't stop the extra `TaskScheduler` and `DAGScheduler` it creates. There are a couple more instances, eg. in `DAGSchedulerSuite`.

This PR adds the possibility to print out the not properly stopped thread list after a test suite executed. The format is the following:

```
===== FINISHED o.a.s.scheduler.DAGSchedulerSuite: 'task end event should have updated accumulators (SPARK-20342)' =====

...

===== Global thread whitelist loaded with name /thread_whitelist from classpath: rpc-client.*, rpc-server.*, shuffle-client.*, shuffle-server.*' =====

ScalaTest-run:

===== THREADS NOT STOPPED PROPERLY =====

ScalaTest-run: dag-scheduler-event-loop
ScalaTest-run: globalEventExecutor-2-5
ScalaTest-run:

===== END OF THREAD DUMP =====

ScalaTest-run:

===== EITHER PUT THREAD NAME INTO THE WHITELIST FILE OR SHUT IT DOWN PROPERLY =====
```

With the help of this leaking threads has been identified in TaskSetManagerSuite. My intention is to hunt down and fix such bugs in later PRs.

## How was this patch tested?

Manual: TaskSetManagerSuite test executed and found out where are the leaking threads.
Automated: Pass the Jenkins.

Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>

Closes #19893 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-16139.
2018-01-16 11:41:08 -08:00
Wenchen Fan 75db14864d [SPARK-22392][SQL] data source v2 columnar batch reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

a new Data Source V2 interface to allow the data source to return `ColumnarBatch` during the scan.

## How was this patch tested?

new tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20153 from cloud-fan/columnar-reader.
2018-01-16 22:41:30 +08:00
Yuanjian Li 07ae39d0ec [SPARK-22956][SS] Bug fix for 2 streams union failover scenario
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This problem reported by yanlin-Lynn ivoson and LiangchangZ. Thanks!

When we union 2 streams from kafka or other sources, while one of them have no continues data coming and in the same time task restart, this will cause an `IllegalStateException`. This mainly cause because the code in [MicroBatchExecution](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MicroBatchExecution.scala#L190) , while one stream has no continues data, its comittedOffset same with availableOffset during `populateStartOffsets`, and `currentPartitionOffsets` not properly handled in KafkaSource. Also, maybe we should also consider this scenario in other Source.

## How was this patch tested?

Add a UT in KafkaSourceSuite.scala

Author: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>

Closes #20150 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-22956.
2018-01-15 22:01:14 -08:00
Marco Gaido 8ab2d7ea99 [SPARK-23080][SQL] Improve error message for built-in functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When a user puts the wrong number of parameters in a function, an AnalysisException is thrown. If the function is a UDF, he user is told how many parameters the function expected and how many he/she put. If the function, instead, is a built-in one, no information about the number of parameters expected and the actual one is provided. This can help in some cases, to debug the errors (eg. bad quotes escaping may lead to a different number of parameters than expected, etc. etc.)

The PR adds the information about the number of parameters passed and the expected one, analogously to what happens for UDF.

## How was this patch tested?

modified existing UT + manual test

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20271 from mgaido91/SPARK-23080.
2018-01-16 11:47:42 +09:00
xubo245 6c81fe227a [SPARK-23035][SQL] Fix improper information of TempTableAlreadyExistsException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Problem: it throw TempTableAlreadyExistsException and output "Temporary table '$table' already exists" when we create temp view by using org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.GlobalTempViewManager#create, it's improper.

So fix improper information about TempTableAlreadyExistsException when create temp view:

change "Temporary table"  to  "Temporary view"

## How was this patch tested?

test("rename temporary view - destination table already exists, with: CREATE TEMPORARY view")

test("rename temporary view - destination table with database name,with:CREATE TEMPORARY view")

Author: xubo245 <601450868@qq.com>

Closes #20227 from xubo245/fixDeprecated.
2018-01-15 23:13:15 +08:00
Yuming Wang a38c887ac0 [SPARK-19550][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP] Remove MaxPermSize for sql module
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove `MaxPermSize` for `sql` module

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested.

Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>

Closes #20268 from wangyum/SPARK-19550-MaxPermSize.
2018-01-15 07:49:34 -06:00
Takeshi Yamamuro b59808385c [SPARK-23023][SQL] Cast field data to strings in showString
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current `Datset.showString` prints rows thru `RowEncoder` deserializers like;
```
scala> Seq(Seq(Seq(1, 2), Seq(3), Seq(4, 5, 6))).toDF("a").show(false)
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|a                                                           |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|[WrappedArray(1, 2), WrappedArray(3), WrappedArray(4, 5, 6)]|
+------------------------------------------------------------+
```
This result is incorrect because the correct one is;
```
scala> Seq(Seq(Seq(1, 2), Seq(3), Seq(4, 5, 6))).toDF("a").show(false)
+------------------------+
|a                       |
+------------------------+
|[[1, 2], [3], [4, 5, 6]]|
+------------------------+
```
So, this pr fixed code in `showString` to cast field data to strings before printing.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `DataFrameSuite`.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20214 from maropu/SPARK-23023.
2018-01-15 16:26:52 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 9a96bfc8bf [SPARK-23049][SQL] spark.sql.files.ignoreCorruptFiles should work for ORC files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When `spark.sql.files.ignoreCorruptFiles=true`, we should ignore corrupted ORC files.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with a newly added test case.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20240 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23049.
2018-01-15 12:06:56 +08:00
Takeshi Yamamuro b98ffa4d6d [SPARK-23054][SQL] Fix incorrect results of casting UserDefinedType to String
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed the issue when casting `UserDefinedType`s into strings;
```
>>> from pyspark.ml.classification import MultilayerPerceptronClassifier
>>> from pyspark.ml.linalg import Vectors
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([(0.0, Vectors.dense([0.0, 0.0])), (1.0, Vectors.dense([0.0, 1.0]))], ["label", "features"])
>>> df.selectExpr("CAST(features AS STRING)").show(truncate = False)
+-------------------------------------------+
|features                                   |
+-------------------------------------------+
|[6,1,0,0,2800000020,2,0,0,0]               |
|[6,1,0,0,2800000020,2,0,0,3ff0000000000000]|
+-------------------------------------------+
```
The root cause is that `Cast` handles input data as `UserDefinedType.sqlType`(this is underlying storage type), so we should pass data into `UserDefinedType.deserialize` then `toString`.
This pr modified the result into;
```
+---------+
|features |
+---------+
|[0.0,0.0]|
|[0.0,1.0]|
+---------+
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `UserDefinedTypeSuite `.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20246 from maropu/SPARK-23054.
2018-01-15 10:55:21 +08:00
guoxiaolong 42a1a15d73 [SPARK-22999][SQL] show databases like command' can remove the like keyword
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

SHOW DATABASES (LIKE pattern = STRING)? Can be like the back increase?
When using this command, LIKE keyword can be removed.
You can refer to the SHOW TABLES command, SHOW TABLES 'test *' and SHOW TABELS like 'test *' can be used.
Similarly SHOW DATABASES 'test *' and SHOW DATABASES like 'test *' can be used.

## How was this patch tested?
unit tests   manual tests
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: guoxiaolong <guo.xiaolong1@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20194 from guoxiaolongzte/SPARK-22999.
2018-01-15 02:02:49 +08:00
Takeshi Yamamuro 0066d6f6fa [SPARK-21213][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Use compatible types for comparisons in compareAndGetNewStats
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed code to compare values in `compareAndGetNewStats`.
The test below fails in the current master;
```
    val oldStats2 = CatalogStatistics(sizeInBytes = BigInt(Long.MaxValue) * 2)
    val newStats5 = CommandUtils.compareAndGetNewStats(
      Some(oldStats2), newTotalSize = BigInt(Long.MaxValue) * 2, None)
    assert(newStats5.isEmpty)
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added some tests in `CommandUtilsSuite`.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20245 from maropu/SPARK-21213-FOLLOWUP.
2018-01-14 05:39:38 +08:00
CodingCat ba891ec993 [SPARK-22790][SQL] add a configurable factor to describe HadoopFsRelation's size
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

as per discussion in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19864#discussion_r156847927

the current HadoopFsRelation is purely based on the underlying file size which is not accurate and makes the execution vulnerable to errors like OOM

Users can enable CBO with the functionalities in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19864 to avoid this issue

This JIRA proposes to add a configurable factor to sizeInBytes method in HadoopFsRelation class so that users can mitigate this problem without CBO

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>
Author: Nan Zhu <nanzhu@uber.com>

Closes #20072 from CodingCat/SPARK-22790.
2018-01-14 02:36:32 +08:00
xubo245 bd4a21b482 [SPARK-23036][SQL][TEST] Add withGlobalTempView for testing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add withGlobalTempView when create global temp view, like withTempView and withView.
And correct some improper usage.
Please see jira.
There are other similar place like that. I will fix it if community need. Please confirm it.
## How was this patch tested?

no new test.

Author: xubo245 <601450868@qq.com>

Closes #20228 from xubo245/DropTempView.
2018-01-14 02:28:57 +08:00
Sameer Agarwal 55dbfbca37 Revert "[SPARK-22908] Add kafka source and sink for continuous processing."
This reverts commit 6f7aaed805.
2018-01-12 15:00:00 -08:00
Marco Gaido 54277398af [SPARK-22975][SS] MetricsReporter should not throw exception when there was no progress reported
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`MetricsReporter ` assumes that there has been some progress for the query, ie. `lastProgress` is not null. If this is not true, as it might happen in particular conditions, a `NullPointerException` can be thrown.

The PR checks whether there is a `lastProgress` and if this is not true, it returns a default value for the metrics.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20189 from mgaido91/SPARK-22975.
2018-01-12 11:25:37 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 7bd14cfd40 [MINOR][BUILD] Fix Java linter errors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR cleans up the java-lint errors (for v2.3.0-rc1 tag). Hopefully, this will be the final one.

```
$ dev/lint-java
Using `mvn` from path: /usr/local/bin/mvn
Checkstyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/memory/HeapMemoryAllocator.java:[85] (sizes) LineLength: Line is longer than 100 characters (found 101).
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/InProcessAppHandle.java:[20,8] (imports) UnusedImports: Unused import - java.io.IOException.
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnVector.java:[41,9] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'private' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
[ERROR] src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDataFrameSuite.java:[464] (sizes) LineLength: Line is longer than 100 characters (found 102).
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual.

```
$ dev/lint-java
Using `mvn` from path: /usr/local/bin/mvn
Checkstyle checks passed.
```

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20242 from dongjoon-hyun/fix_lint_java_2.3_rc1.
2018-01-12 10:18:42 -08:00
gatorsmile 651f76153f [SPARK-23028] Bump master branch version to 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch bumps the master branch version to `2.4.0-SNAPSHOT`.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20222 from gatorsmile/bump24.
2018-01-13 00:37:59 +08:00
Marco Gaido 5050868069 [SPARK-23025][SQL] Support Null type in scala reflection
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add support for `Null` type in the `schemaFor` method for Scala reflection.

## How was this patch tested?

Added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20219 from mgaido91/SPARK-23025.
2018-01-12 18:04:44 +08:00
Jose Torres 6f7aaed805 [SPARK-22908] Add kafka source and sink for continuous processing.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add kafka source and sink for continuous processing. This involves two small changes to the execution engine:

* Bring data reader close() into the normal data reader thread to avoid thread safety issues.
* Fix up the semantics of the RECONFIGURING StreamExecution state. State updates are now atomic, and we don't have to deal with swallowing an exception.

## How was this patch tested?

new unit tests

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20096 from jose-torres/continuous-kafka.
2018-01-11 10:52:12 -08:00
Feng Liu 9b33dfc408 [SPARK-22951][SQL] fix aggregation after dropDuplicates on empty data frames
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

(courtesy of liancheng)

Spark SQL supports both global aggregation and grouping aggregation. Global aggregation always return a single row with the initial aggregation state as the output, even there are zero input rows. Spark implements this by simply checking the number of grouping keys and treats an aggregation as a global aggregation if it has zero grouping keys.

However, this simple principle drops the ball in the following case:

```scala
spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates().agg(count($"*") as "c").show()
// +---+
// | c |
// +---+
// | 1 |
// +---+
```

The reason is that:

1. `df.dropDuplicates()` is roughly translated into something equivalent to:

```scala
val allColumns = df.columns.map { col }
df.groupBy(allColumns: _*).agg(allColumns.head, allColumns.tail: _*)
```

This translation is implemented in the rule `ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate`.

2. `spark.emptyDataFrame` contains zero columns and zero rows.

Therefore, rule `ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate` makes a confusing transformation roughly equivalent to the following one:

```scala
spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates()
=> spark.emptyDataFrame.groupBy().agg(Map.empty[String, String])
```

The above transformation is confusing because the resulting aggregate operator contains no grouping keys (because `emptyDataFrame` contains no columns), and gets recognized as a global aggregation. As a result, Spark SQL allocates a single row filled by the initial aggregation state and uses it as the output, and returns a wrong result.

To fix this issue, this PR tweaks `ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate` by appending a literal `1` to the grouping key list of the resulting `Aggregate` operator when the input plan contains zero output columns. In this way, `spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates()` is now translated into a grouping aggregation, roughly depicted as:

```scala
spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates()
=> spark.emptyDataFrame.groupBy(lit(1)).agg(Map.empty[String, String])
```

Which is now properly treated as a grouping aggregation and returns the correct answer.

## How was this patch tested?

New unit tests added

Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>

Closes #20174 from liufengdb/fix-duplicate.
2018-01-10 14:25:04 -08:00
Wenchen Fan eaac60a1e2 [SPARK-16060][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] add a wrapper solution for vectorized orc reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is mostly from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775

The wrapper solution is pretty good for string/binary type, as the ORC column vector doesn't keep bytes in a continuous memory region, and has a significant overhead when copying the data to Spark columnar batch. For other cases, the wrapper solution is almost same with the current solution.

I think we can treat the wrapper solution as a baseline and keep improving the writing to Spark solution.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20205 from cloud-fan/orc.
2018-01-10 15:16:27 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 6f169ca9e1 [MINOR] fix a typo in BroadcastJoinSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec` should be `BroadcastHashJoinExec`

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20202 from cloud-fan/typo.
2018-01-10 10:20:34 +08:00
Wang Gengliang 96ba217a06 [SPARK-23005][CORE] Improve RDD.take on small number of partitions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current implementation of RDD.take, we overestimate the number of partitions we need to try by 50%:
`(1.5 * num * partsScanned / buf.size).toInt`
However, when the number is small, the result of `.toInt` is not what we want.
E.g, 2.9 will become 2, which should be 3.
Use Math.ceil to fix the problem.

Also clean up the code in RDD.scala.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>

Closes #20200 from gengliangwang/Take.
2018-01-10 10:15:27 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun f44ba910f5 [SPARK-16060][SQL] Support Vectorized ORC Reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR adds an ORC columnar-batch reader to native `OrcFileFormat`. Since both Spark `ColumnarBatch` and ORC `RowBatch` are used together, it is faster than the current Spark implementation. This replaces the prior PR, #17924.

Also, this PR adds `OrcReadBenchmark` to show the performance improvement.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the existing test cases.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #19943 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16060.
2018-01-09 21:48:14 +08:00
xubo245 68ce792b58 [SPARK-22972] Couldn't find corresponding Hive SerDe for data source provider org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the warning: Couldn't find corresponding Hive SerDe for data source provider org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.

## How was this patch tested?
 test("SPARK-22972: hive orc source")
    assert(HiveSerDe.sourceToSerDe("org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc")
      .equals(HiveSerDe.sourceToSerDe("orc")))

Author: xubo245 <601450868@qq.com>

Closes #20165 from xubo245/HiveSerDe.
2018-01-09 10:15:01 +08:00
Jose Torres 4f7e758834 [SPARK-22912] v2 data source support in MicroBatchExecution
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support for v2 data sources in microbatch streaming.

## How was this patch tested?

A very basic new unit test on the toy v2 implementation of rate source. Once we have a v1 source fully migrated to v2, we'll need to do more detailed compatibility testing.

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20097 from jose-torres/v2-impl.
2018-01-08 13:24:08 -08:00
Xianjin YE 40b983c3b4 [SPARK-22952][CORE] Deprecate stageAttemptId in favour of stageAttemptNumber
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.  Deprecate attemptId in StageInfo and add `def attemptNumber() = attemptId`
2. Replace usage of stageAttemptId with stageAttemptNumber

## How was this patch tested?
I manually checked the compiler warning info

Author: Xianjin YE <advancedxy@gmail.com>

Closes #20178 from advancedxy/SPARK-22952.
2018-01-08 23:49:07 +08:00
Wenchen Fan eb45b52e82 [SPARK-21865][SQL] simplify the distribution semantic of Spark SQL
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

**The current shuffle planning logic**

1. Each operator specifies the distribution requirements for its children, via the `Distribution` interface.
2. Each operator specifies its output partitioning, via the `Partitioning` interface.
3. `Partitioning.satisfy` determines whether a `Partitioning` can satisfy a `Distribution`.
4. For each operator, check each child of it, add a shuffle node above the child if the child partitioning can not satisfy the required distribution.
5. For each operator, check if its children's output partitionings are compatible with each other, via the `Partitioning.compatibleWith`.
6. If the check in 5 failed, add a shuffle above each child.
7. try to eliminate the shuffles added in 6, via `Partitioning.guarantees`.

This design has a major problem with the definition of "compatible".

`Partitioning.compatibleWith` is not well defined, ideally a `Partitioning` can't know if it's compatible with other `Partitioning`, without more information from the operator. For example, `t1 join t2 on t1.a = t2.b`, `HashPartitioning(a, 10)` should be compatible with `HashPartitioning(b, 10)` under this case, but the partitioning itself doesn't know it.

As a result, currently `Partitioning.compatibleWith` always return false except for literals, which make it almost useless. This also means, if an operator has distribution requirements for multiple children, Spark always add shuffle nodes to all the children(although some of them can be eliminated). However, there is no guarantee that the children's output partitionings are compatible with each other after adding these shuffles, we just assume that the operator will only specify `ClusteredDistribution` for multiple children.

I think it's very hard to guarantee children co-partition for all kinds of operators, and we can not even give a clear definition about co-partition between distributions like `ClusteredDistribution(a,b)` and `ClusteredDistribution(c)`.

I think we should drop the "compatible" concept in the distribution model, and let the operator achieve the co-partition requirement by special distribution requirements.

**Proposed shuffle planning logic after this PR**
(The first 4 are same as before)
1. Each operator specifies the distribution requirements for its children, via the `Distribution` interface.
2. Each operator specifies its output partitioning, via the `Partitioning` interface.
3. `Partitioning.satisfy` determines whether a `Partitioning` can satisfy a `Distribution`.
4. For each operator, check each child of it, add a shuffle node above the child if the child partitioning can not satisfy the required distribution.
5. For each operator, check if its children's output partitionings have the same number of partitions.
6. If the check in 5 failed, pick the max number of partitions from children's output partitionings, and add shuffle to child whose number of partitions doesn't equal to the max one.

The new distribution model is very simple, we only have one kind of relationship, which is `Partitioning.satisfy`. For multiple children, Spark only guarantees they have the same number of partitions, and it's the operator's responsibility to leverage this guarantee to achieve more complicated requirements. For example, non-broadcast joins can use the newly added `HashPartitionedDistribution` to achieve co-partition.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #19080 from cloud-fan/exchange.
2018-01-08 19:41:41 +08:00
Josh Rosen 2c73d2a948 [SPARK-22983] Don't push filters beneath aggregates with empty grouping expressions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The following SQL query should return zero rows, but in Spark it actually returns one row:

```
SELECT 1 from (
  SELECT 1 AS z,
  MIN(a.x)
  FROM (select 1 as x) a
  WHERE false
) b
where b.z != b.z
```

The problem stems from the `PushDownPredicate` rule: when this rule encounters a filter on top of an Aggregate operator, e.g. `Filter(Agg(...))`, it removes the original filter and adds a new filter onto Aggregate's child, e.g. `Agg(Filter(...))`. This is sometimes okay, but the case above is a counterexample: because there is no explicit `GROUP BY`, we are implicitly computing a global aggregate over the entire table so the original filter was not acting like a `HAVING` clause filtering the number of groups: if we push this filter then it fails to actually reduce the cardinality of the Aggregate output, leading to the wrong answer.

In 2016 I fixed a similar problem involving invalid pushdowns of data-independent filters (filters which reference no columns of the filtered relation). There was additional discussion after my fix was merged which pointed out that my patch was an incomplete fix (see #15289), but it looks I must have either misunderstood the comment or forgot to follow up on the additional points raised there.

This patch fixes the problem by choosing to never push down filters in cases where there are no grouping expressions. Since there are no grouping keys, the only columns are aggregate columns and we can't push filters defined over aggregate results, so this change won't cause us to miss out on any legitimate pushdown opportunities.

## How was this patch tested?

New regression tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `FilterPushdownSuite`.

Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>

Closes #20180 from JoshRosen/SPARK-22983-dont-push-filters-beneath-aggs-with-empty-grouping-expressions.
2018-01-08 16:04:03 +08:00
hyukjinkwon 8fdeb4b994 [SPARK-22979][PYTHON][SQL] Avoid per-record type dispatch in Python data conversion (EvaluatePython.fromJava)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Seems we can avoid type dispatch for each value when Java objection (from Pyrolite) -> Spark's internal data format because we know the schema ahead.

I manually performed the benchmark as below:

```scala
  test("EvaluatePython.fromJava / EvaluatePython.makeFromJava") {
    val numRows = 1000 * 1000
    val numFields = 30

    val random = new Random(System.nanoTime())
    val types = Array(
      BooleanType, ByteType, FloatType, DoubleType, IntegerType, LongType, ShortType,
      DecimalType.ShortDecimal, DecimalType.IntDecimal, DecimalType.ByteDecimal,
      DecimalType.FloatDecimal, DecimalType.LongDecimal, new DecimalType(5, 2),
      new DecimalType(12, 2), new DecimalType(30, 10), CalendarIntervalType)
    val schema = RandomDataGenerator.randomSchema(random, numFields, types)
    val rows = mutable.ArrayBuffer.empty[Array[Any]]
    var i = 0
    while (i < numRows) {
      val row = RandomDataGenerator.randomRow(random, schema)
      rows += row.toSeq.toArray
      i += 1
    }

    val benchmark = new Benchmark("EvaluatePython.fromJava / EvaluatePython.makeFromJava", numRows)
    benchmark.addCase("Before - EvaluatePython.fromJava", 3) { _ =>
      var i = 0
      while (i < numRows) {
        EvaluatePython.fromJava(rows(i), schema)
        i += 1
      }
    }

    benchmark.addCase("After - EvaluatePython.makeFromJava", 3) { _ =>
      val fromJava = EvaluatePython.makeFromJava(schema)
      var i = 0
      while (i < numRows) {
        fromJava(rows(i))
        i += 1
      }
    }

    benchmark.run()
  }
```

```
EvaluatePython.fromJava / EvaluatePython.makeFromJava: Best/Avg Time(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before - EvaluatePython.fromJava              1265 / 1346          0.8        1264.8       1.0X
After - EvaluatePython.makeFromJava            571 /  649          1.8         570.8       2.2X
```

If the structure is nested, I think the advantage should be larger than this.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests should cover this. Also, I manually checked if the values from before / after are actually same via `assert` when performing the benchmarks.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20172 from HyukjinKwon/type-dispatch-python-eval.
2018-01-08 13:59:08 +08:00
fjh100456 7b78041423 [SPARK-21786][SQL] When acquiring 'compressionCodecClassName' in 'ParquetOptions', parquet.compression needs to be considered.
[SPARK-21786][SQL] When acquiring 'compressionCodecClassName' in 'ParquetOptions', `parquet.compression` needs to be considered.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since Hive 1.1, Hive allows users to set parquet compression codec via table-level properties parquet.compression. See the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7858 . We do support orc.compression for ORC. Thus, for external users, it is more straightforward to support both. See the stackflow question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36941122/spark-sql-ignores-parquet-compression-propertie-specified-in-tblproperties
In Spark side, our table-level compression conf compression was added by #11464 since Spark 2.0.
We need to support both table-level conf. Users might also use session-level conf spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec. The priority rule will be like
If other compression codec configuration was found through hive or parquet, the precedence would be compression, parquet.compression, spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec. Acceptable values include: none, uncompressed, snappy, gzip, lzo.
The rule for Parquet is consistent with the ORC after the change.

Changes:
1.Increased acquiring 'compressionCodecClassName' from `parquet.compression`,and the precedence order is `compression`,`parquet.compression`,`spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec`, just like what we do in `OrcOptions`.

2.Change `spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec` to support "none".Actually in `ParquetOptions`,we do support "none" as equivalent to "uncompressed", but it does not allowed to configured to "none".

3.Change `compressionCode` to `compressionCodecClassName`.

## How was this patch tested?
Add test.

Author: fjh100456 <fu.jinhua6@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20076 from fjh100456/ParquetOptionIssue.
2018-01-06 18:19:57 +08:00
Takeshi Yamamuro e8af7e8aec [SPARK-22937][SQL] SQL elt output binary for binary inputs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr modified `elt` to output binary for binary inputs.
`elt` in the current master always output data as a string. But, in some databases (e.g., MySQL), if all inputs are binary, `elt` also outputs binary (Also, this might be a small surprise).
This pr is related to #19977.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `TypeCoercionSuite`.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20135 from maropu/SPARK-22937.
2018-01-06 09:26:03 +08:00
Takeshi Yamamuro 52fc5c17d9 [SPARK-22825][SQL] Fix incorrect results of Casting Array to String
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed the issue when casting arrays into strings;
```
scala> val df = spark.range(10).select('id.cast("integer")).agg(collect_list('id).as('ids))
scala> df.write.saveAsTable("t")
scala> sql("SELECT cast(ids as String) FROM t").show(false)
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|ids                                                               |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeArrayData8bc285df|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
```

This pr modified the result into;
```
+------------------------------+
|ids                           |
+------------------------------+
|[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]|
+------------------------------+
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CastSuite` and `SQLQuerySuite`.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20024 from maropu/SPARK-22825.
2018-01-05 14:02:21 +08:00
Juliusz Sompolski df7fc3ef38 [SPARK-22957] ApproxQuantile breaks if the number of rows exceeds MaxInt
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

32bit Int was used for row rank.
That overflowed in a dataframe with more than 2B rows.

## How was this patch tested?

Added test, but ignored, as it takes 4 minutes.

Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>

Closes #20152 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-22957.
2018-01-05 10:16:34 +08:00
Wenchen Fan d5861aba9d [SPARK-22945][SQL] add java UDF APIs in the functions object
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently Scala users can use UDF like
```
val foo = udf((i: Int) => Math.random() + i).asNondeterministic
df.select(foo('a))
```
Python users can also do it with similar APIs. However Java users can't do it, we should add Java UDF APIs in the functions object.

## How was this patch tested?

new tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20141 from cloud-fan/udf.
2018-01-04 19:17:22 +08:00
Felix Cheung df95a908ba [SPARK-22933][SPARKR] R Structured Streaming API for withWatermark, trigger, partitionBy
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

R Structured Streaming API for withWatermark, trigger, partitionBy

## How was this patch tested?

manual, unit tests

Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>

Closes #20129 from felixcheung/rwater.
2018-01-03 21:43:14 -08:00
Wenchen Fan b297029130 [SPARK-20960][SQL] make ColumnVector public
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

move `ColumnVector` and related classes to `org.apache.spark.sql.vectorized`, and improve the document.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20116 from cloud-fan/column-vector.
2018-01-04 07:28:53 +08:00
Wenchen Fan a66fe36cee [SPARK-20236][SQL] dynamic partition overwrite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When overwriting a partitioned table with dynamic partition columns, the behavior is different between data source and hive tables.

data source table: delete all partition directories that match the static partition values provided in the insert statement.

hive table: only delete partition directories which have data written into it

This PR adds a new config to make users be able to choose hive's behavior.

## How was this patch tested?

new tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #18714 from cloud-fan/overwrite-partition.
2018-01-03 22:18:13 +08:00
gatorsmile 1a87a1609c [SPARK-22934][SQL] Make optional clauses order insensitive for CREATE TABLE SQL statement
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, our CREATE TABLE syntax require the EXACT order of clauses. It is pretty hard to remember the exact order. Thus, this PR is to make optional clauses order insensitive for `CREATE TABLE` SQL statement.

```
CREATE [TEMPORARY] TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] [db_name.]table_name
    [(col_name1 col_type1 [COMMENT col_comment1], ...)]
    USING datasource
    [OPTIONS (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
    [PARTITIONED BY (col_name1, col_name2, ...)]
    [CLUSTERED BY (col_name3, col_name4, ...) INTO num_buckets BUCKETS]
    [LOCATION path]
    [COMMENT table_comment]
    [TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
    [AS select_statement]
```

The proposal is to make the following clauses order insensitive.
```
    [OPTIONS (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
    [PARTITIONED BY (col_name1, col_name2, ...)]
    [CLUSTERED BY (col_name3, col_name4, ...) INTO num_buckets BUCKETS]
    [LOCATION path]
    [COMMENT table_comment]
    [TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
```

The same idea is also applicable to Create Hive Table.
```
CREATE [EXTERNAL] TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] [db_name.]table_name
    [(col_name1[:] col_type1 [COMMENT col_comment1], ...)]
    [COMMENT table_comment]
    [PARTITIONED BY (col_name2[:] col_type2 [COMMENT col_comment2], ...)]
    [ROW FORMAT row_format]
    [STORED AS file_format]
    [LOCATION path]
    [TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
    [AS select_statement]
```

The proposal is to make the following clauses order insensitive.
```
    [COMMENT table_comment]
    [PARTITIONED BY (col_name2[:] col_type2 [COMMENT col_comment2], ...)]
    [ROW FORMAT row_format]
    [STORED AS file_format]
    [LOCATION path]
    [TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20133 from gatorsmile/createDataSourceTableDDL.
2018-01-03 22:09:30 +08:00
Xianjin YE a6fc300e91 [SPARK-22897][CORE] Expose stageAttemptId in TaskContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
stageAttemptId added in TaskContext and corresponding construction modification

## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test in TaskContextSuite, two cases are tested:
1. Normal case without failure
2. Exception case with resubmitted stages

Link to [SPARK-22897](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22897)

Author: Xianjin YE <advancedxy@gmail.com>

Closes #20082 from advancedxy/SPARK-22897.
2018-01-02 23:30:38 +08:00
Bryan Cutler 1c9f95cb77 [SPARK-22530][PYTHON][SQL] Adding Arrow support for ArrayType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This change adds `ArrayType` support for working with Arrow in pyspark when creating a DataFrame, calling `toPandas()`, and using vectorized `pandas_udf`.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new Python unit tests using Array data.

Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>

Closes #20114 from BryanCutler/arrow-ArrayType-support-SPARK-22530.
2018-01-02 07:13:27 +09:00
Sean Owen c284c4e1f6 [MINOR] Fix a bunch of typos 2018-01-02 07:10:19 +09:00
gatorsmile cfbe11e816 [SPARK-22895][SQL] Push down the deterministic predicates that are after the first non-deterministic
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we do not guarantee an order evaluation of conjuncts in either Filter or Join operator. This is also true to the mainstream RDBMS vendors like DB2 and MS SQL Server. Thus, we should also push down the deterministic predicates that are after the first non-deterministic, if possible.

## How was this patch tested?
Updated the existing test cases.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20069 from gatorsmile/morePushDown.
2017-12-31 15:06:54 +08:00
Gabor Somogyi ee3af15fea [SPARK-22363][SQL][TEST] Add unit test for Window spilling
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There is already test using window spilling, but the test coverage is not ideal.

In this PR the already existing test was fixed and additional cases added.

## How was this patch tested?

Automated: Pass the Jenkins.

Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>

Closes #20022 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-22363.
2017-12-31 14:47:23 +08:00
Takeshi Yamamuro f2b3525c17 [SPARK-22771][SQL] Concatenate binary inputs into a binary output
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr modified `concat` to concat binary inputs into a single binary output.
`concat` in the current master always output data as a string. But, in some databases (e.g., PostgreSQL), if all inputs are binary, `concat` also outputs binary.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `TypeCoercionSuite`.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #19977 from maropu/SPARK-22771.
2017-12-30 14:09:56 +08:00
WeichenXu 2ea17afb63 [SPARK-22881][ML][TEST] ML regression package testsuite add StructuredStreaming test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

ML regression package testsuite add StructuredStreaming test

In order to make testsuite easier to modify, new helper function added in `MLTest`:
```
def testTransformerByGlobalCheckFunc[A : Encoder](
      dataframe: DataFrame,
      transformer: Transformer,
      firstResultCol: String,
      otherResultCols: String*)
      (globalCheckFunction: Seq[Row] => Unit): Unit
```

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Author: Bago Amirbekian <bago@databricks.com>

Closes #19979 from WeichenXu123/ml_stream_test.
2017-12-29 20:06:56 -08:00
oraviv fcf66a3276 [SPARK-21657][SQL] optimize explode quadratic memory consumpation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The issue has been raised in two Jira tickets: [SPARK-21657](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21657), [SPARK-16998](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16998). Basically, what happens is that in collection generators like explode/inline we create many rows from each row. Currently each exploded row contains also the column on which it was created. This causes, for example, if we have a 10k array in one row that this array will get copy 10k times - to each of the row. this results a qudratic memory consumption. However, it is a common case that the original column gets projected out after the explode, so we can avoid duplicating it.
In this solution we propose to identify this situation in the optimizer and turn on a flag for omitting the original column in the generation process.

## How was this patch tested?

1. We added a benchmark test to MiscBenchmark that shows x16 improvement in runtimes.
2. We ran some of the other tests in MiscBenchmark and they show 15% improvements.
3. We ran this code on a specific case from our production data with rows containing arrays of size ~200k and it reduced the runtime from 6 hours to 3 mins.

Author: oraviv <oraviv@paypal.com>
Author: uzadude <ohad.raviv@gmail.com>
Author: uzadude <15645757+uzadude@users.noreply.github.com>

Closes #19683 from uzadude/optimize_explode.
2017-12-29 21:08:34 +08:00
Feng Liu cc30ef8009 [SPARK-22916][SQL] shouldn't bias towards build right if user does not specify
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When there are no broadcast hints, the current spark strategies will prefer to building the right side, without considering the sizes of the two tables. This patch added the logic to consider the sizes of the two tables for the build side. To make the logic clear, the build side is determined by two steps:

1. If there are broadcast hints, the build side is determined by `broadcastSideByHints`;
2. If there are no broadcast hints, the build side is determined by `broadcastSideBySizes`;
3. If the broadcast is disabled by the config, it falls back to the next cases.

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>

Closes #20099 from liufengdb/fix-spark-strategies.
2017-12-29 18:48:47 +08:00
Wang Gengliang d4f0b1d2c5 [SPARK-22834][SQL] Make insertion commands have real children to fix UI issues
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

With #19474,  children of insertion commands are missing in UI.
To fix it:
1. Create a new physical plan `DataWritingCommandExec` to exec `DataWritingCommand` with children.  So that the other commands won't be affected.
2. On creation of `DataWritingCommand`, a new field `allColumns` must be specified, which is the output of analyzed plan.
3. In `FileFormatWriter`, the output schema will use `allColumns` instead of the output of optimized plan.

Before code changes:
![2017-12-19 10 27 10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/34161850-d2fd0acc-e50c-11e7-898a-177154fe7d8e.png)

After code changes:
![2017-12-19 10 27 04](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/34161865-de23de26-e50c-11e7-9131-0c32f7b7b749.png)

## How was this patch tested?
Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>

Closes #20020 from gengliangwang/insert.
2017-12-29 15:28:33 +08:00
soonmok-kwon ffe6fd77a4 [SPARK-22818][SQL] csv escape of quote escape
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Escape of escape should be considered when using the UniVocity csv encoding/decoding library.

Ref: https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers#escaping-quote-escape-characters

One option is added for reading and writing CSV: `escapeQuoteEscaping`

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test added.

Author: soonmok-kwon <soonmok.kwon@navercorp.com>

Closes #20004 from ep1804/SPARK-22818.
2017-12-29 07:30:06 +08:00
Yuming Wang 613b71a123 [SPARK-22890][TEST] Basic tests for DateTimeOperations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Test Coverage for `DateTimeOperations`, this is a Sub-tasks for [SPARK-22722](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22722).

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>

Closes #20061 from wangyum/SPARK-22890.
2017-12-29 06:58:38 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 5536f3181c [MINOR][BUILD] Fix Java linter errors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR cleans up a few Java linter errors for Apache Spark 2.3 release.

## How was this patch tested?

```bash
$ dev/lint-java
Using `mvn` from path: /usr/local/bin/mvn
Checkstyle checks passed.
```

We can see the result from [Travis CI](https://travis-ci.org/dongjoon-hyun/spark/builds/322470787), too.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20101 from dongjoon-hyun/fix-java-lint.
2017-12-28 09:43:50 -06:00
Zhenhua Wang 2877817420 [SPARK-22917][SQL] Should not try to generate histogram for empty/null columns
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For empty/null column, the result of `ApproximatePercentile` is null. Then in `ApproxCountDistinctForIntervals`, a `MatchError` (for `endpoints`) will be thrown if we try to generate histogram for that column. Besides, there is no need to generate histogram for such column. In this patch, we exclude such column when generating histogram.

## How was this patch tested?

Enhanced test cases for empty/null columns.

Author: Zhenhua Wang <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>

Closes #20102 from wzhfy/no_record_hgm_bug.
2017-12-28 21:49:37 +08:00
Shixiong Zhu 32ec269d08 [SPARK-22909][SS] Move Structured Streaming v2 APIs to streaming folder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR moves Structured Streaming v2 APIs to streaming folder as following:
```
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/streaming
├── ContinuousReadSupport.java
├── ContinuousWriteSupport.java
├── MicroBatchReadSupport.java
├── MicroBatchWriteSupport.java
├── reader
│   ├── ContinuousDataReader.java
│   ├── ContinuousReader.java
│   ├── MicroBatchReader.java
│   ├── Offset.java
│   └── PartitionOffset.java
└── writer
    └── ContinuousWriter.java
```

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins

Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>

Closes #20093 from zsxwing/move.
2017-12-28 12:35:17 +08:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 5683984520 [SPARK-18016][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Code Generation: Constant Pool Limit - reduce entries for mutable state
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR addresses additional review comments in #19811

## How was this patch tested?

Existing test suites

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #20036 from kiszk/SPARK-18066-followup.
2017-12-28 12:28:19 +08:00
Marco Gaido 774715d5c7 [SPARK-22904][SQL] Add tests for decimal operations and string casts
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Test coverage for arithmetic operations leading to:

 1. Precision loss
 2. Overflow

Moreover, tests for casting bad string to other input types and for using bad string as operators of some functions.

## How was this patch tested?

added tests

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20084 from mgaido91/SPARK-22904.
2017-12-27 23:53:10 +08:00
Yuming Wang 91d1b300d4 [SPARK-22894][SQL] DateTimeOperations should accept SQL like string type
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`DateTimeOperations` accept [`StringType`](ae998ec2b5/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala (L669)),  but:

```
spark-sql> SELECT '2017-12-24' + interval 2 months 2 seconds;
Error in query: cannot resolve '(CAST('2017-12-24' AS DOUBLE) + interval 2 months 2 seconds)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(CAST('2017-12-24' AS DOUBLE) + interval 2 months 2 seconds)' (double and calendarinterval).; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias((cast(2017-12-24 as double) + interval 2 months 2 seconds), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
spark-sql>
```

After this PR:
```
spark-sql> SELECT '2017-12-24' + interval 2 months 2 seconds;
2018-02-24 00:00:02
Time taken: 0.2 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)

```

## How was this patch tested?

unit tests

Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>

Closes #20067 from wangyum/SPARK-22894.
2017-12-26 09:40:41 -08:00
Marco Gaido ff48b1b338 [SPARK-22901][PYTHON] Add deterministic flag to pyspark UDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In SPARK-20586 the flag `deterministic` was added to Scala UDF, but it is not available for python UDF. This flag is useful for cases when the UDF's code can return different result with the same input. Due to optimization, duplicate invocations may be eliminated or the function may even be invoked more times than it is present in the query. This can lead to unexpected behavior.

This PR adds the deterministic flag, via the `asNondeterministic` method, to let the user mark the function as non-deterministic and therefore avoid the optimizations which might lead to strange behaviors.

## How was this patch tested?

Manual tests:
```
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import *
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>> df_br = spark.createDataFrame([{'name': 'hello'}])
>>> import random
>>> udf_random_col =  udf(lambda: int(100*random.random()), IntegerType()).asNondeterministic()
>>> df_br = df_br.withColumn('RAND', udf_random_col())
>>> random.seed(1234)
>>> udf_add_ten =  udf(lambda rand: rand + 10, IntegerType())
>>> df_br.withColumn('RAND_PLUS_TEN', udf_add_ten('RAND')).show()
+-----+----+-------------+
| name|RAND|RAND_PLUS_TEN|
+-----+----+-------------+
|hello|   3|           13|
+-----+----+-------------+

```

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Author: Marco Gaido <mgaido@hortonworks.com>

Closes #19929 from mgaido91/SPARK-22629.
2017-12-26 06:39:40 -08:00
Takuya UESHIN eb386be1ed [SPARK-21552][SQL] Add DecimalType support to ArrowWriter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Decimal type is not yet supported in `ArrowWriter`.
This is adding the decimal type support.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a test to `ArrowConvertersSuite`.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>

Closes #18754 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-21552.
2017-12-26 21:37:25 +09:00
Yuming Wang 33ae2437ba [SPARK-22893][SQL] Unified the data type mismatch message
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We should use `dataType.simpleString` to unified the data type mismatch message:
Before:
```
spark-sql> select cast(1 as binary);
Error in query: cannot resolve 'CAST(1 AS BINARY)' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast IntegerType to BinaryType; line 1 pos 7;
```
After:
```
park-sql> select cast(1 as binary);
Error in query: cannot resolve 'CAST(1 AS BINARY)' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast int to binary; line 1 pos 7;
```

## How was this patch tested?

Exist test.

Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>

Closes #20064 from wangyum/SPARK-22893.
2017-12-25 01:14:09 -08:00
Jose Torres 8941a4abca [SPARK-22789] Map-only continuous processing execution
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Basic continuous execution, supporting map/flatMap/filter, with commits and advancement through RPC.

## How was this patch tested?

new unit-ish tests (exercising execution end to end)

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #19984 from jose-torres/continuous-impl.
2017-12-22 23:05:03 -08:00
Michael Armbrust 8df1da396f [SPARK-22862] Docs on lazy elimination of columns missing from an encoder
This behavior has confused some users, so lets clarify it.

Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>

Closes #20048 from marmbrus/datasetAsDocs.
2017-12-21 21:38:16 -08:00
Imran Rashid 7beb375bf4 [SPARK-22861][SQL] SQLAppStatusListener handles multi-job executions.
When one execution has multiple jobs, we need to append to the set of
stages, not replace them on every job.

Added unit test and ran existing tests on jenkins

Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>

Closes #20047 from squito/SPARK-22861.
2017-12-21 15:37:55 -08:00
Tejas Patil fe65361b05 [SPARK-22042][FOLLOW-UP][SQL] ReorderJoinPredicates can break when child's partitioning is not decided
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup PR of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19257 where gatorsmile had left couple comments wrt code style.

## How was this patch tested?

Doesn't change any functionality. Will depend on build to see if no checkstyle rules are violated.

Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>

Closes #20041 from tejasapatil/followup_19257.
2017-12-21 09:22:08 -08:00
Yuming Wang 4e107fdb74 [SPARK-22822][TEST] Basic tests for WindowFrameCoercion and DecimalPrecision
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Test Coverage for `WindowFrameCoercion` and `DecimalPrecision`, this is a Sub-tasks for [SPARK-22722](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22722).

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>

Closes #20008 from wangyum/SPARK-22822.
2017-12-21 09:18:27 -08:00
Wenchen Fan d3a1d9527b [SPARK-22786][SQL] only use AppStatusPlugin in history server
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19681 we introduced a new interface called `AppStatusPlugin`, to register listeners and set up the UI for both live and history UI.

However I think it's an overkill for live UI. For example, we should not register `SQLListener` if users are not using SQL functions. Previously we register the `SQLListener` and set up SQL tab when `SparkSession` is firstly created, which indicates users are going to use SQL functions. But in #19681 , we register the SQL functions during `SparkContext` creation. The same thing should apply to streaming too.

I think we should keep the previous behavior, and only use this new interface for history server.

To reflect this change, I also rename the new interface to `SparkHistoryUIPlugin`

This PR also refines the tests for sql listener.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #19981 from cloud-fan/listener.
2017-12-22 01:08:13 +08:00
Bryan Cutler 59d52631eb [SPARK-22324][SQL][PYTHON] Upgrade Arrow to 0.8.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Upgrade Spark to Arrow 0.8.0 for Java and Python.  Also includes an upgrade of Netty to 4.1.17 to resolve dependency requirements.

The highlights that pertain to Spark for the update from Arrow versoin 0.4.1 to 0.8.0 include:

* Java refactoring for more simple API
* Java reduced heap usage and streamlined hot code paths
* Type support for DecimalType, ArrayType
* Improved type casting support in Python
* Simplified type checking in Python

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>

Closes #19884 from BryanCutler/arrow-upgrade-080-SPARK-22324.
2017-12-21 20:43:56 +09:00
Xingbo Jiang 9c289a5cb4 [SPARK-22387][SQL] Propagate session configs to data source read/write options
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Introduce a new interface `SessionConfigSupport` for `DataSourceV2`, it can help to propagate session configs with the specified key-prefix to all data source operations in this session.

## How was this patch tested?

Add new test suite `DataSourceV2UtilsSuite`.

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #19861 from jiangxb1987/datasource-configs.
2017-12-21 10:02:30 +08:00