### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`LikeSimplification` rule does not work correctly for many cases that have patterns containing escape characters, for example:
`SELECT s LIKE 'm%aca' ESCAPE '%' FROM t`
`SELECT s LIKE 'maacaa' ESCAPE 'a' FROM t`
For simpilicy, this PR makes this rule just be skipped if `pattern` contains any `escapeChar`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Result corrupt.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added Unit test.
Closes#30625 from luluorta/SPARK-33677.
Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to enable `spark.sql.adaptive.enabled` by default for Apache Spark **3.2.0**.
### Why are the changes needed?
By switching the default for Apache Spark 3.2, the whole community can focus more on the stabilizing this feature in the various situation more seriously.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, but this is an improvement and it's supposed to have no bugs.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Closes#30628 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33679.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to migrate `ALTER [TABLE|ViEW] ... RENAME TO` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table/view identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).
### Why are the changes needed?
To use `UnresolvedTableOrView` for table/view resolution. Note that `AlterTableRenameCommand` internally resolves to a temp view first, so there is no resolution behavior change with this PR.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests.
Closes#30610 from imback82/rename_v2.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30412. This PR updates the error message of char/varchar table insertion length check, to not expose user data.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is risky to expose user data in the error message, especially the string data, as it may contain sensitive data.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
updated tests
Closes#30653 from cloud-fan/minor2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30554 . Now we have a new config for converting CREATE TABLE, we don't need the old config that only works for CTAS.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's confusing for having two config while one can cover another completely.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no, it's deprecating not removing.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#30651 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to fix typos in the sub-modules:
* `sql/catalyst`
* `sql/hive-thriftserver`
* `sql/hive`
Split per srowen https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30323#issuecomment-728981618
NOTE: The misspellings have been reported at 706a726f87 (commitcomment-44064356)
### Why are the changes needed?
Misspelled words make it harder to read / understand content.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
There are various fixes to documentation, etc...
### How was this patch tested?
No testing was performed
Closes#30532 from jsoref/spelling-sql-not-core.
Authored-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR, we suppose to narrow the use cases of the char/varchar data types, of which are invalid now or later
### Why are the changes needed?
1. udf
```scala
scala> spark.udf.register("abcd", () => "12345", org.apache.spark.sql.types.VarcharType(2))
scala> spark.sql("select abcd()").show
scala.MatchError: CharType(2) (of class org.apache.spark.sql.types.VarcharType)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder$.externalDataTypeFor(RowEncoder.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder$.externalDataTypeForInput(RowEncoder.scala:212)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.objects.ValidateExternalType.<init>(objects.scala:1741)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder$.$anonfun$serializerFor$3(RowEncoder.scala:175)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$flatMap$1(TraversableLike.scala:245)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:36)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach$(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:33)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayOps$ofRef.foreach(ArrayOps.scala:198)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.flatMap(TraversableLike.scala:245)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.flatMap$(TraversableLike.scala:242)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayOps$ofRef.flatMap(ArrayOps.scala:198)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder$.serializerFor(RowEncoder.scala:171)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder$.apply(RowEncoder.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$.$anonfun$ofRows$2(Dataset.scala:99)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:768)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$.ofRows(Dataset.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$1(SparkSession.scala:611)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:768)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:606)
... 47 elided
```
2. spark.createDataframe
```
scala> spark.createDataFrame(spark.read.text("README.md").rdd, new org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType().add("c", "char(1)")).show
+--------------------+
| c|
+--------------------+
| # Apache Spark|
| |
|Spark is a unifie...|
|high-level APIs i...|
|supports general ...|
|rich set of highe...|
|MLlib for machine...|
|and Structured St...|
| |
|<https://spark.ap...|
| |
|[![Jenkins Build]...|
|[ to see rationalization of this patch.
This patch proposes to introduce state schema validation, via storing key schema and value schema to `schema` file (for the first time) and verify new key schema and value schema for state are compatible with existing one. To be clear for definition of "compatible", state schema is "compatible" when number of fields are same and data type for each field is same - Spark has been allowing rename of field.
This patch will prevent query run which has incompatible state schema, which would reduce the chance to get indeterministic behavior (actually renaming of field is also the smell of semantically incompatible, but end users could just modify its name so we can't say) as well as providing more informative error message.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs.
Closes#24173 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-27237.
Lead-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For the SQL configs `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInWrite` and `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead`, improve their descriptions by:
1. Explicitly document on which parquet types, those configs influence on
2. Refer to corresponding configs for `INT96`
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid user confusions like reposted in SPARK-33571, and make the config description more precise.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `./dev/scalastyle`.
Closes#30596 from MaxGekk/clarify-rebase-docs.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Suggest users using Datetime conversion functions in the error message of invalid ANSI explicit casting.
### Why are the changes needed?
In ANSI mode, explicit cast between DateTime types and Numeric types is not allowed.
As of now, we have introduced new functions `UNIX_SECONDS`/`UNIX_MILLIS`/`UNIX_MICROS`/`UNIX_DATE`/`DATE_FROM_UNIX_DATE`, we can show suggestions to users so that they can complete these type conversions precisely and easily in ANSI mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, better error messages
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#30603 from gengliangwang/improveErrorMsgOfExplicitCast.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, in spark, the temp view is saved as its analyzed logical plan, while the permanent view
is kept in HMS with its origin SQL text. As a result, permanent and temporary views have
different behaviors in some cases. In this PR we store the SQL text for temporary view in order
to unify the behavior between permanent and temporary views.
### Why are the changes needed?
to unify the behavior between permanent and temporary views
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, with this PR, the temporary view will be re-analyzed when it's referred. So if the
underlying datasource changed, the view will also be updated.
### How was this patch tested?
existing and newly added test cases
Closes#30567 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-33142.
Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the documentation of SQL configuration `spark.sql.ansi.enabled`
### Why are the changes needed?
As there are more and more new features under the SQL configuration `spark.sql.ansi.enabled`, we should make it more clear about:
1. what exactly it is
2. where can users find all the features of the ANSI mode
3. whether all the features are exactly from the SQL standard
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
It's just doc change.
Closes#30593 from gengliangwang/reviseAnsiDoc.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change the order of post-analysis checks for the `ALTER TABLE .. ADD/DROP PARTITION` command, and perform the general check (does the table support partition management at all) before specific checks.
### Why are the changes needed?
The error message for the table which doesn't support partition management can mislead users:
```java
PartitionSpecs are not resolved;;
'AlterTableAddPartition [UnresolvedPartitionSpec(Map(id -> 1),None)], false
+- ResolvedTable org.apache.spark.sql.connector.InMemoryTableCatalog2fd64b11, ns1.ns2.tbl, org.apache.spark.sql.connector.InMemoryTable5d3ff859
```
because it says nothing about the root cause of the issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the change, the error message will be:
```
Table ns1.ns2.tbl can not alter partitions
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suite `AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite`.
Closes#30594 from MaxGekk/check-order-AlterTablePartition.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR provides us with a way to check if a data source is going to reject the delete via `deleteWhere` at planning time.
### Why are the changes needed?
The only way to support delete statements right now is to implement ``SupportsDelete``. According to its Javadoc, that interface is meant for cases when we can delete data without much effort (e.g. like deleting a complete partition in a Hive table).
This PR actually provides us with a way to check if a data source is going to reject the delete via `deleteWhere` at planning time instead of just getting an exception during execution. In the future, we can use this functionality to decide whether Spark should rewrite this delete and execute a distributed query or it can just pass a set of filters.
Consider an example of a partitioned Hive table. If we have a delete predicate like `part_col = '2020'`, we can just drop the matching partition to satisfy this delete. In this case, the data source should return `true` from `canDeleteWhere` and use the filters it accepts in `deleteWhere` to drop the partition. I consider this as a delete without significant effort. At the same time, if we have a delete predicate like `id = 10`, Hive tables would not be able to execute this delete using a metadata only operation without rewriting files. In that case, the data source should return `false` from `canDeleteWhere` and we should use a more sophisticated row-level API to find out which records should be removed (the API is yet to be discussed, but we need this PR as a basis).
If we decide to support subqueries and all delete use cases by simply extending the existing API, this will mean all data sources will have to implement a lot of Spark logic to determine which records changed. I don't think we want to go that way as the Spark logic to determine which records should be deleted is independent of the underlying data source. So the assumption is that Spark will execute a plan to find which records must be deleted for data sources that return `false` from `canDeleteWhere`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes but it is backward compatible.
### How was this patch tested?
This PR comes with a new test.
Closes#30562 from aokolnychyi/spark-33623.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For CRETE TABLE [AS SELECT] command, creates native Parquet table if neither USING nor STORE AS is specified and `spark.sql.legacy.createHiveTableByDefault` is false.
This is a retry after we unify the CREATE TABLE syntax. It partially reverts d2bec5e265
This PR allows `CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE` when `LOCATION` is present. This was not allowed for data source tables before, which is an unnecessary behavior different with hive tables.
### Why are the changes needed?
Changing from Hive text table to native Parquet table has many benefits:
1. be consistent with `DataFrameWriter.saveAsTable`.
2. better performance
3. better support for nested types (Hive text table doesn't work well with nested types, e.g. `insert into t values struct(null)` actually inserts a null value not `struct(null)` if `t` is a Hive text table, which leads to wrong result)
4. better interoperability as Parquet is a more popular open file format.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No by default. If the config is set, the behavior change is described below:
Behavior-wise, the change is very small as the native Parquet table is also Hive-compatible. All the Spark DDL commands that works for hive tables also works for native Parquet tables, with two exceptions: `ALTER TABLE SET [SERDE | SERDEPROPERTIES]` and `LOAD DATA`.
char/varchar behavior has been taken care by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30412, and there is no behavior difference between data source and hive tables.
One potential issue is `CREATE TABLE ... LOCATION ...` while users want to directly access the files later. It's more like a corner case and the legacy config should be good enough.
Another potential issue is users may use Spark to create the table and then use Hive to add partitions with different serde. This is not allowed for Spark native tables.
### How was this patch tested?
Re-enable the tests
Closes#30554 from cloud-fan/create-table.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of [#27151](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27151). It fixes the same issue for the codegen path.
### Why are the changes needed?
Result corrupt.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added Unit test.
Closes#30585 from luluorta/SPARK-26218.
Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add new functions DATE_FROM_UNIX_DATE and UNIX_DATE for conversion between Date type and Numeric types.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Explicit conversion between Date type and Numeric types is disallowed in ANSI mode. We need to provide new functions for users to complete the conversion.
2. We have introduced new functions from Bigquery for conversion between Timestamp type and Numeric types: TIMESTAMP_SECONDS, TIMESTAMP_MILLIS, TIMESTAMP_MICROS , UNIX_SECONDS, UNIX_MILLIS, and UNIX_MICROS. It makes sense to add functions for conversion between Date type and Numeric types as well.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, two new datetime functions are added.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#30588 from gengliangwang/dateToNumber.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28534 adds functions from [BigQuery](https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/timestamp_functions) for converting numbers to timestamp, this PR is to add functions UNIX_SECONDS, UNIX_MILLIS and UNIX_MICROS for converting timestamp to numbers.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Symmetry of the conversion functions
2. Casting timestamp type to numeric types is disallowed in ANSI mode, we should provide functions for users to complete the conversion.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
3 new functions UNIX_SECONDS, UNIX_MILLIS and UNIX_MICROS for converting timestamp to long type.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#30566 from gengliangwang/timestampLong.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `join()` uses `withPlan(logicalPlan)` for convenient to call some Dataset functions. But it leads to the `dataset_id` inconsistent between the `logicalPlan` and the original `Dataset`(because `withPlan(logicalPlan)` will create a new Dataset with the new id and reset the `dataset_id` with the new id of the `logicalPlan`). As a result, it breaks the rule `DetectAmbiguousSelfJoin`.
In this PR, we propose to drop the usage of `withPlan` but use the `logicalPlan` directly so its `dataset_id` doesn't change.
Besides, this PR also removes related metadata (`DATASET_ID_KEY`, `COL_POS_KEY`) when an `Alias` tries to construct its own metadata. Because the `Alias` is no longer a reference column after converting to an `Attribute`. To achieve that, we add a new field, `deniedMetadataKeys`, to indicate the metadata that needs to be removed.
### Why are the changes needed?
For the query below, it returns the wrong result while it should throws ambiguous self join exception instead:
```scala
val emp1 = Seq[TestData](
TestData(1, "sales"),
TestData(2, "personnel"),
TestData(3, "develop"),
TestData(4, "IT")).toDS()
val emp2 = Seq[TestData](
TestData(1, "sales"),
TestData(2, "personnel"),
TestData(3, "develop")).toDS()
val emp3 = emp1.join(emp2, emp1("key") === emp2("key")).select(emp1("*"))
emp1.join(emp3, emp1.col("key") === emp3.col("key"), "left_outer")
.select(emp1.col("*"), emp3.col("key").as("e2")).show()
// wrong result
+---+---------+---+
|key| value| e2|
+---+---------+---+
| 1| sales| 1|
| 2|personnel| 2|
| 3| develop| 3|
| 4| IT| 4|
+---+---------+---+
```
This PR fixes the wrong behaviour.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users hit the exception instead of the wrong result after this PR.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a new unit test.
Closes#30488 from Ngone51/fix-self-join.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code Gen bug fix that introduced by SPARK-33460
```
GetMapValueUtil
s"""throw new NoSuchElementException("Key " + $eval2 + " does not exist.");"""
SHOULD BE
s"""throw new java.util.NoSuchElementException("Key " + $eval2 + " does not exist.");"""
```
And the reason why SPARK-33460 failed to detect this bug via UT, it was because that `checkExceptionInExpression ` did not work as expect like `checkEvaluation` which will try eval expression with BOTH `CODEGEN_ONLY` and `NO_CODEGEN` mode, and in this PR, will also fix this Test bug, too.
### Why are the changes needed?
Bug Fix.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Add UT and Existing UT.
Closes#30560 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33619.
Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30504. It proposes:
- Rename `NoSideEffect` to `NoThrow`, and use `Expression.deterministic` together where it is used.
- Clarify, in the docs in the expressions, that it means they don't throw exceptions
### Why are the changes needed?
`NoSideEffect` virtually means that `Expression.eval` does not throw an exception, and the expressions are deterministic.
It's best to be explicit so `NoThrow` was proposed - I looked if there's a similar name to represent this concept and borrowed the name of [nothrow](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nothrow).
For determinism, we already have a way to note it under `Expression.deterministic`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually ran the existing unittests written.
Closes#30570 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33544.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit SPARK-33212 (cb3fa6c936) mostly with three exceptions:
1. `SparkSubmitUtils` was updated recently by SPARK-33580
2. `resource-managers/yarn/pom.xml` was updated recently by SPARK-33104 to add `hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager` test dependency.
3. Adjust `com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-jaxb-annotations` dependency in K8s module which is updated recently by SPARK-33471.
### Why are the changes needed?
According to [HADOOP-16080](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16080) since Apache Hadoop 3.1.1, `hadoop-aws` doesn't work with `hadoop-client-api`. It fails at write operation like the following.
**1. Spark distribution with `-Phadoop-cloud`**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --conf spark.hadoop.fs.s3a.access.key=$AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID --conf spark.hadoop.fs.s3a.secret.key=$AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
20/11/30 23:01:24 WARN NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java classes where applicable
Using Spark's default log4j profile: org/apache/spark/log4j-defaults.properties
Setting default log level to "WARN".
To adjust logging level use sc.setLogLevel(newLevel). For SparkR, use setLogLevel(newLevel).
Spark context available as 'sc' (master = local[*], app id = local-1606806088715).
Spark session available as 'spark'.
Welcome to
____ __
/ __/__ ___ _____/ /__
_\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/ '_/
/___/ .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\ version 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT
/_/
Using Scala version 2.12.10 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_272)
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.
scala> spark.read.parquet("s3a://dongjoon/users.parquet").show
20/11/30 23:01:34 WARN MetricsConfig: Cannot locate configuration: tried hadoop-metrics2-s3a-file-system.properties,hadoop-metrics2.properties
+------+--------------+----------------+
| name|favorite_color|favorite_numbers|
+------+--------------+----------------+
|Alyssa| null| [3, 9, 15, 20]|
| Ben| red| []|
+------+--------------+----------------+
scala> Seq(1).toDF.write.parquet("s3a://dongjoon/out.parquet")
20/11/30 23:02:14 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 2.0 (TID 2)/ 1]
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.hadoop.util.SemaphoredDelegatingExecutor.<init>(Lcom/google/common/util/concurrent/ListeningExecutorService;IZ)V
```
**2. Spark distribution without `-Phadoop-cloud`**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --conf spark.hadoop.fs.s3a.access.key=$AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID --conf spark.hadoop.fs.s3a.secret.key=$AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY -c spark.eventLog.enabled=true -c spark.eventLog.dir=s3a://dongjoon/spark-events/ --packages org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-aws:3.2.0,org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:3.2.0
...
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.hadoop.util.SemaphoredDelegatingExecutor.<init>(Lcom/google/common/util/concurrent/ListeningExecutorService;IZ)V
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem.create(S3AFileSystem.java:772)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CI.
Closes#30508 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33212-REVERT.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to add full outer stream-stream join, and the implementation of full outer join is:
* For left side input row, check if there's a match on right side state store.
* if there's a match, output the joined row, o.w. output nothing. Put the row in left side state store.
* For right side input row, check if there's a match on left side state store.
* if there's a match, output the joined row, o.w. output nothing. Put the row in right side state store.
* State store eviction: evict rows from left/right side state store below watermark, and output rows never matched before (a combination of left outer and right outer join).
### Why are the changes needed?
Enable more use cases for spark stream-stream join.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests in `UnsupportedOperationChecker.scala` and `StreamingJoinSuite.scala`.
Closes#30395 from c21/stream-foj.
Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32295 added in an optimization to insert a filter for not null and size > 0 when using inner explode/inline. This is fine in most cases but the extra filter is not needed if the explode is with a create array and not using Literals (it already handles LIterals). When this happens you know that the values aren't null and it has a size. It already handles the empty array.
The not null check is already optimized out because Createarray and createMap are not nullable, that leaves the size > 0 check. To handle that this PR makes it so that the size > 0 check gets optimized in ConstantFolding to be the size of the children in the array or map. That makes it a literal and then makes it ultimately be optimized out.
### Why are the changes needed?
remove unneeded filter
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added and manually tested various cases
Closes#30504 from tgravescs/SPARK-33544.
Lead-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new batch to the optimizer for executing rules that rewrite plans for data sources.
### Why are the changes needed?
Right now, we have a special place in the optimizer where we construct v2 scans. As time shows, we need more rewrite rules that would be executed after the operator optimization and before any stats-related rules for v2 tables. Not all rules will be specific to reads. One option is to rename the current batch into something more generic but it would require changing quite some places. That's why it seems better to introduce a new batch and use it for all rewrites. The name is generic so that we don't limit ourselves to v2 data sources only.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The change is trivial and SPARK-23889 will depend on it.
Closes#30558 from aokolnychyi/spark-33612.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds logic to handle DELETE/UPDATE/MERGE plans in `PullupCorrelatedPredicates`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Right now, `PullupCorrelatedPredicates` applies only to filters and unary nodes. As a result, correlated predicates in DELETE/UPDATE/MERGE are not rewritten.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The PR adds 3 new test cases.
Closes#30555 from aokolnychyi/spark-33608.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of #30302 . As part of this PR, sameOrderExpressions set is made part of children of SortOrder node - so that they don't need any special handling as done in #30302 .
### Why are the changes needed?
sameOrderExpressions should get same treatment as child. So making them part of children helps in transforming them easily.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Closes#30430 from prakharjain09/SPARK-33400-sortorder-refactor.
Authored-by: Prakhar Jain <prakharjain09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark already support `LIKE ANY` syntax, but it will throw `StackOverflowError` if there are many elements(more than 14378 elements). We should implement built-in function for LIKE ANY to fix this issue.
Why the stack overflow can happen in the current approach ?
The current approach uses reduceLeft to connect each `Like(e, p)`, this will lead the the call depth of the thread is too large, causing `StackOverflowError` problems.
Why the fix in this PR can avoid the error?
This PR support built-in function for `LIKE ANY` and avoid this issue.
### Why are the changes needed?
1.Fix the `StackOverflowError` issue.
2.Support built-in function `like_any`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#30465 from beliefer/SPARK-33045-like_any-bak.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecated `KafkaConsumer.poll(long)` API calls may cause infinite wait in the driver. In this PR I've added a new `AdminClient` based offset fetching which is turned off by default. There is a new flag named `spark.sql.streaming.kafka.useDeprecatedOffsetFetching` (default: `true`) which can be set to `false` to reach the newly added functionality. The Structured Streaming migration guide contains more information what migration consideration must be done. Please see the following [doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gAh0pKgZUgyqO2Re3sAy-fdYpe_SxpJ6DkeXE8R1P7E/edit?usp=sharing) for further details.
The PR contains the following changes:
* Added `AdminClient` based offset fetching
* GroupId prefix feature removed from driver but only in `AdminClient` based approach (`AdminClient` doesn't need any GroupId)
* GroupId override feature removed from driver but only in `AdminClient` based approach (`AdminClient` doesn't need any GroupId)
* Additional unit tests
* Code comment changes
* Minor bugfixes here and there
* Removed Kafka auto topic creation feature but only in `AdminClient` based approach (please see doc for rationale). In short, it's super hidden, not sure anybody ever used in production + error prone.
* Added documentation to `ss-migration-guide` and `structured-streaming-kafka-integration`
### Why are the changes needed?
Driver may hang forever.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing + additional unit tests.
Cluster test with simple Kafka topic to another topic query.
Documentation:
```
cd docs/
SKIP_API=1 jekyll build
```
Manual webpage check.
Closes#29729 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-32032.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Datetime building should fail if the year, month, ..., second combination is invalid, when ANSI mode is enabled. This patch should update MakeDate, MakeTimestamp and MakeInterval.
### Why are the changes needed?
For ANSI mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT and Existing UT.
Closes#30516 from waitinfuture/SPARK-33498.
Lead-authored-by: zky.zhoukeyong <zky.zhoukeyong@alibaba-inc.com>
Co-authored-by: waitinfuture <waitinfuture@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Remove the method `listPartitionIdentifiers()` from the `SupportsPartitionManagement` interface. The method lists partitions by ident prefix.
2. Rename `listPartitionByNames()` to `listPartitionIdentifiers()`.
3. Re-implement the default method `partitionExists()` using new method.
### Why are the changes needed?
Getting partitions by ident prefix only is not used, and it can be removed to improve code maintenance. Also this makes the `SupportsPartitionManagement` interface cleaner.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Should not.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suites:
```
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.connector.catalog.*"
```
Closes#30514 from MaxGekk/remove-listPartitionIdentifiers.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Remove V2 logical node `ShowPartitionsStatement `, and replace it by V2 `ShowPartitions`.
2. Implement V2 execution node `ShowPartitionsExec` similar to V1 `ShowPartitionsCommand`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To have feature parity with Datasource V1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change, `SHOW PARTITIONS` fails in V2 table catalogs with the exception:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: SHOW PARTITIONS is only supported with v1 tables.
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveSessionCatalog.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$analysis$ResolveSessionCatalog$$parseV1Table(ResolveSessionCatalog.scala:628)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveSessionCatalog$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(ResolveSessionCatalog.scala:466)
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running the following test suites:
1. Modified `ShowPartitionsParserSuite` where `ShowPartitionsStatement` is replaced by V2 `ShowPartitions`.
2. `v2.ShowPartitionsSuite`
Closes#30398 from MaxGekk/show-partitions-exec-v2.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the char/varchar type which is kind of a variant of string type:
1. Char type is fixed-length string. When comparing char type values, we need to pad the shorter one to the longer length.
2. Varchar type is string with a length limitation.
To implement the char/varchar semantic, this PR:
1. Do string length check when writing to char/varchar type columns.
2. Do string padding when reading char type columns. We don't do it at the writing side to save storage space.
3. Do string padding when comparing char type column with string literal or another char type column. (string literal is fixed length so should be treated as char type as well)
To simplify the implementation, this PR doesn't propagate char/varchar type info through functions/operators(e.g. `substring`). That said, a column can only be char/varchar type if it's a table column, not a derived column like `SELECT substring(col)`.
To be safe, this PR doesn't add char/varchar type to the query engine(expression input check, internal row framework, codegen framework, etc.). We will replace char/varchar type by string type with metadata (`Attribute.metadata` or `StructField.metadata`) that includes the original type string before it goes into the query engine. That said, the existing code will not see char/varchar type but only string type.
char/varchar type may come from several places:
1. v1 table from hive catalog.
2. v2 table from v2 catalog.
3. user-specified schema in `spark.read.schema` and `spark.readStream.schema`
4. `Column.cast`
5. schema string in places like `from_json`, pandas UDF, etc. These places use SQL parser which replaces char/varchar with string already, even before this PR.
This PR covers all the above cases, implements the length check and padding feature by looking at string type with special metadata.
### Why are the changes needed?
char and varchar are standard SQL types. varchar is widely used in other databases instead of string type.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
For hive tables: now the table insertion fails if the value exceeds char/varchar length. Previously we truncate the value silently.
For other tables:
1. now char type is allowed.
2. now we have length check when inserting to varchar columns. Previously we write the value as it is.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#30412 from cloud-fan/char.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Spark allows calls to `count` even for non parameterless aggregate function. For example, the following query actually works:
`SELECT count() FROM tenk1;`
On the other hand, mainstream databases will throw an error.
**Oracle**
`> ORA-00909: invalid number of arguments`
**PgSQL**
`ERROR: count(*) must be used to call a parameterless aggregate function`
**MySQL**
`> 1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')`
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a bug so that consistent with mainstream databases.
There is an example query output with/without this fix.
`SELECT count() FROM testData;`
The output before this fix:
`0`
The output after this fix:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
cannot resolve 'count()' due to data type mismatch: count requires at least one argument.; line 1 pos 7
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
If not specify parameter for `count`, will throw an error.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#30541 from beliefer/SPARK-28646.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Dup code removed in SPARK-33498 as follow-up.
### Why are the changes needed?
Nit.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#30540 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33498.
Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support `CHACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` commands for v2 tables.
In addtion, this PR proposes to migrate `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).
### Why are the changes needed?
To support `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` commands for v2 tables.
Note that `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` for v1 tables/views go through `SparkSession.table` to resolve identifier, which resolves temp views first, so there is no change in the behavior by moving to the new framework.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Now the user can run `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` commands on v2 tables.
### How was this patch tested?
Added/updated existing tests.
Closes#30403 from imback82/cache_table.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#### JIRA expectations
```
INSERT currently does not support named column lists.
INSERT INTO <table> (col1, col2,…) VALUES( 'val1', 'val2', … )
Note, we assume the column list contains all the column names. Issue an exception if the list is not complete. The column order could be different from the column order defined in the table definition.
```
#### implemetations
In this PR, we add a column list as an optional part to the `INSERT OVERWRITE/INTO` statements:
```
/**
* {{{
* INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE tableIdentifier [partitionSpec [IF NOT EXISTS]]? [identifierList] ...
* INSERT INTO [TABLE] tableIdentifier [partitionSpec] [identifierList] ...
* }}}
*/
```
The column list represents all expected columns with an explicit order that you want to insert to the target table. **Particularly**, we assume the column list contains all the column names in the current implementation, it will fail when the list is incomplete.
In **Analyzer**, we add a code path to resolve the column list in the `ResolveOutputRelation` rule before it is transformed to v1 or v2 command. It will fail here if the list has any field that not belongs to the target table.
Then, for v2 command, e.g. `AppendData`, we use the resolved column list and output of the target table to resolve the output of the source query `ResolveOutputRelation` rule. If the list has duplicated columns, we fail. If the list is not empty but the list size does not match the target table, we fail. If no other exceptions occur, we use the column list to map the output of the source query to the output of the target table. The column list will be set to Nil and it will not hit the rule again after it is resolved.
for v1 command, those all happen in the `PreprocessTableInsertion` rule
### Why are the changes needed?
new feature support
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes, insert into/overwrite table support specify column list
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#29893 from yaooqinn/SPARK-32976.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes CreateViewCommand/AlterViewAsCommand capturing runtime SQL configs and store them as view properties. These configs will be applied during the parsing and analysis phases of the view resolution. Users can set `spark.sql.legacy.useCurrentConfigsForView` to `true` to restore the behavior before.
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR is a sub-task of [SPARK-33138](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33138) that proposes to unify temp view and permanent view behaviors. This PR makes permanent views mimicking the temp view behavior that "fixes" view semantic by directly storing resolved LogicalPlan. For example, if a user uses spark 2.4 to create a view that contains null values from division-by-zero expressions, she may not want that other users' queries which reference her view throw exceptions when running on spark 3.x with ansi mode on.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
added UT + existing UTs (improved)
Closes#30289 from luluorta/SPARK-33141.
Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Datetime parsing should fail if the input string can't be parsed, or the pattern string is invalid, when ANSI mode is enable. This patch should update GetTimeStamp, UnixTimeStamp, ToUnixTimeStamp and Cast.
### Why are the changes needed?
For ANSI mode.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT and Existing UT.
Closes#30442 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33498.
Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in Spark one could redefine a window. For instance:
`select count(*) OVER w FROM tenk1 WINDOW w AS (ORDER BY unique1), w AS (ORDER BY unique1);`
The window `w` is defined two times. In PgSQL, on the other hand, a thrown will happen:
`ERROR: window "w" is already defined`
### Why are the changes needed?
The current implement gives the following window definitions a higher priority. But it wasn't Spark's intention and users can't know from any document of Spark.
This PR fixes the bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
There is an example query output with/without this fix.
```
SELECT
employee_name,
salary,
first_value(employee_name) OVER w highest_salary,
nth_value(employee_name, 2) OVER w second_highest_salary
FROM
basic_pays
WINDOW
w AS (ORDER BY salary DESC ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING),
w AS (ORDER BY salary DESC ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 2 FOLLOWING)
ORDER BY salary DESC
```
The output before this fix:
```
Larry Bott 11798 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Gerard Bondur 11472 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Pamela Castillo 11303 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Barry Jones 10586 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
George Vanauf 10563 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Loui Bondur 10449 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Mary Patterson 9998 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Steve Patterson 9441 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Julie Firrelli 9181 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Jeff Firrelli 8992 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
William Patterson 8870 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Diane Murphy 8435 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Leslie Jennings 8113 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Gerard Hernandez 6949 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Foon Yue Tseng 6660 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Anthony Bow 6627 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
Leslie Thompson 5186 Larry Bott Gerard Bondur
```
The output after this fix:
```
struct<>
-- !query output
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException
The definition of window 'w' is repetitive(line 8, pos 0)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#30512 from beliefer/SPARK-28645.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to improve the exception messages while `UnresolvedTableOrView` is handled based on this suggestion: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30321#discussion_r521127001.
Currently, when an identifier is resolved to a temp view when a table/permanent view is expected, the following exception message is displayed (e.g., for `SHOW CREATE TABLE`):
```
t is a temp view not table or permanent view.
```
After this PR, the message will be:
```
t is a temp view. 'SHOW CREATE TABLE' expects a table or permanent view.
```
Also, if an identifier is not resolved, the following exception message is currently used:
```
Table or view not found: t
```
After this PR, the message will be:
```
Table or permanent view not found for 'SHOW CREATE TABLE': t
```
or
```
Table or view not found for 'ANALYZE TABLE ... FOR COLUMNS ...': t
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve the exception message.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the exception message will be changed as described above.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests.
Closes#30475 from imback82/unresolved_table_or_view.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some differences between Spark CSV, opencsv and commons-csv, the typical case are described in SPARK-33566, When there are both unescaped quotes and unescaped qualifier in value, the results of parsing are different.
The reason for the difference is Spark use `STOP_AT_DELIMITER` as default `UnescapedQuoteHandling` to build `CsvParser` and it not configurable.
On the other hand, opencsv and commons-csv use the parsing mechanism similar to `STOP_AT_CLOSING_QUOTE ` by default.
So this pr make `unescapedQuoteHandling` option configurable to get the same parsing result as opencsv and commons-csv.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make unescapedQuoteHandling option configurable when read CSV to make parsing more flexible。
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
- Add a new case similar to that described in SPARK-33566
Closes#30518 from LuciferYang/SPARK-33566.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an AQE issue where local shuffle reader, partition coalescing, or skew join optimization can be mistakenly applied to a shuffle introduced by repartition or a regular shuffle that logically replaces a repartition shuffle.
The proposed solution checks for the presence of any repartition shuffle and filters out not applicable optimization rules for the final stage in an AQE plan.
### Why are the changes needed?
Without the change, the output of a repartition query may not be correct.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#30494 from maryannxue/csr-repartition.
Authored-by: Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up to fix Scala 2.13 compilation.
### Why are the changes needed?
To support Scala 2.13 in Apache Spark 3.1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the GitHub Action Scala 2.13 compilation job.
Closes#30502 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31257.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
