### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32015 added a way to run benchmarks much more easily in the same GitHub Actions build. This PR updates the benchmark results by using the way.
**NOTE** that looks like GitHub Actions use four types of CPU given my observations:
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU 2.60GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v4 2.30GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 2.40GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU 2.60GHz
Given my quick research, seems like they perform roughly similarly:
I couldn't find enough information about Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU 2.60GHz but the performance seems roughly similar given the numbers.
So shouldn't be a big deal especially given that this way is much easier, encourages contributors to run more and guarantee the same number of cores and same memory with the same softwares.
### Why are the changes needed?
To have a base line of the benchmarks accordingly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
It was generated from:
- [Run benchmarks: * (JDK 11)](https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/713575465)
- [Run benchmarks: * (JDK 8)](https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/713154337)
Closes#32044 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34950.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to specify the JDK8 default configurations `-XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:-UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads` explicitly. As we see in this PR [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25966/files#diff-12b89b7ee67c63c2254b749c8f8d0694R10), this will make the comparison between JDK8 and JDK11 easier by removing a misleading regression.
**NOTE THAT THESE JVM CONFS ARE ONLY FOR BENCHMARK COMPARISON, NOT FOR A PRODUCTION**
### Why are the changes needed?
There exists many JVM-level changes between JDK8 and JDK11. For example, the followings are notable changes and it turns out that especially (1) and (2) shows a misleading regression in our micro-benchmark environment because our microbenchmark uses small VM memory.
1. [JEP 248: Make G1 the Default Garbage Collector](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073273) **JDK9+**
2. [Enable UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads by default](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198547) **JDK11+**
3. [Change default value of HeapSizePerGCThread](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200417) **JDK11+**
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a test-only JVM configuration change. Manually, run the benchmark.
Closes#25966 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29282.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to extend the existing benchmarks to save JDK9+ result separately.
All `core` module benchmark test results are added. I'll run the other test suites in another PR.
After regenerating all results, we will check JDK11 performance regressions.
### Why are the changes needed?
From Apache Spark 3.0, we support both JDK8 and JDK11. We need to have a way to find the performance regression.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually run the benchmark.
Closes#25873 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-JDK11-PERF.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
