### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to upgrade `zstd-jni` to 1.5.0-2, which uses `zstd` version 1.5.0.
### Why are the changes needed?
Major improvements to Zstd support are targeted for the upcoming 3.2.0 release of Spark. Zstd 1.5.0 introduces significant compression (+25% to 140%) and decompression (~15%) speed improvements in benchmarks described in more detail on the releases page:
- https://github.com/facebook/zstd/releases/tag/v1.5.0
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Build passes build tests, but the benchmark tests seem flaky. I am unsure if this change is responsible. The error is:
```
Running org.apache.spark.rdd.CoalescedRDDBenchmark:
21/06/08 18:53:10 ERROR SparkContext: Failed to add file:/home/runner/work/spark/spark/./core/target/scala-2.12/spark-core_2.12-3.2.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar to Spark environment
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: File spark-core_2.12-3.2.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar was already registered with a different path (old path = /home/runner/work/spark/spark/core/target/scala-2.12/spark-core_2.12-3.2.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar, new path = /home/runner/work/spark/spark/./core/target/scala-2.12/spark-core_2.12-3.2.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
https://github.com/dchristle/spark/runs/2776123749?check_suite_focus=true
cc: dongjoon-hyun
Closes#32826 from dchristle/ZSTD150.
Lead-authored-by: David Christle <dchristle@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: David Christle <dchristle@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32015 added a way to run benchmarks much more easily in the same GitHub Actions build. This PR updates the benchmark results by using the way.
**NOTE** that looks like GitHub Actions use four types of CPU given my observations:
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU 2.60GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v4 2.30GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 2.40GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU 2.60GHz
Given my quick research, seems like they perform roughly similarly:
I couldn't find enough information about Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU 2.60GHz but the performance seems roughly similar given the numbers.
So shouldn't be a big deal especially given that this way is much easier, encourages contributors to run more and guarantee the same number of cores and same memory with the same softwares.
### Why are the changes needed?
To have a base line of the benchmarks accordingly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
It was generated from:
- [Run benchmarks: * (JDK 11)](https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/713575465)
- [Run benchmarks: * (JDK 8)](https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/713154337)
Closes#32044 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34950.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to upgrade ZSTD-JNI to 1.4.9-1.
### Why are the changes needed?
ZStandard 1.4.9 and its corresponding JNI brings the following bug fixes and improvements.
- https://github.com/facebook/zstd/releases/tag/v1.4.9
One of notable improvement of ZStandard 1.4.9 is `2x faster Long Distance Mode`, but we are not using it yet.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs with the existing tests and there is no regression in ZStandardBenchmark.
Closes#31784 from dongjoon-hyun/ZSTD-149.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to use `ZstdInputStreamNoFinalizer` and `ZstdOutputStreamNoFinalizer` classes and upgrade ZSTD JNI to 1.4.8-7.
### Why are the changes needed?
`1.4.8-7` makes `NoFinalizer` classes public again. This improves the performance.
- 57d53a09d2
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Closes#31762 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ZSTD-NOFINALIZER.
Lead-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to upgrade Zstd-JNI library to 1.4.8-4 to bring JNI side optimization.
`ZStandardBenchmark` shows that there is no regression in terms of performance and show some improvements.
### Why are the changes needed?
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commits/v1.4.8-4
- be9be47fae
- be51ebade1
- 44ff8b6f95
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Closes#31585 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ZSTD-1.4.8-4.
Lead-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add ZStandardBenchmark as a base-line.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will prevent any regression when we upgrade Zstandard library in the future.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually.
Closes#31498 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ZSTD-BENCH.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
