### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Function-related `HiveExternalCatalog` APIs do not have enough verification logics. After the PR, `HiveExternalCatalog` and `InMemoryCatalog` become consistent in the error handling.
For example, below is the exception we got when calling `renameFunction`.
```
15:13:40.369 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.ObjectStore: Failed to get database db1, returning NoSuchObjectException
15:13:40.377 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.ObjectStore: Failed to get database db2, returning NoSuchObjectException
15:13:40.739 ERROR DataNucleus.Datastore.Persist: Update of object "org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.model.MFunction205629e9" using statement "UPDATE FUNCS SET FUNC_NAME=? WHERE FUNC_ID=?" failed : org.apache.derby.shared.common.error.DerbySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: The statement was aborted because it would have caused a duplicate key value in a unique or primary key constraint or unique index identified by 'UNIQUEFUNCTION' defined on 'FUNCS'.
at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.wrapInSQLException(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.handleException(Unknown Source)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Improved the existing test cases to check whether the messages are right.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14521 from gatorsmile/functionChecking.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is the second step for the following feature:
For hash aggregation in Spark SQL, we use a fast aggregation hashmap to act as a "cache" in order to boost aggregation performance. Previously, the hashmap is backed by a `ColumnarBatch`. This has performance issues when we have wide schema for the aggregation table (large number of key fields or value fields).
In this JIRA, we support another implementation of fast hashmap, which is backed by a `RowBatch`. We then automatically pick between the two implementations based on certain knobs.
In this second-step PR, we enable `RowBasedHashMapGenerator` in `HashAggregateExec`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests: `RowBasedAggregateHashMapSuite` and ` VectorizedAggregateHashMapSuite`
Additional micro-benchmarks tests and TPCDS results will be added in a separate PR in the series.
Author: Qifan Pu <qifan.pu@gmail.com>
Author: ooq <qifan.pu@gmail.com>
Closes#14176 from ooq/rowbasedfastaggmap-pr2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some codes in subexpressionEliminationForWholeStageCodegen are never used actually.
Remove them using this PR.
## How was this patch tested?
Local unit tests.
Author: Yucai Yu <yucai.yu@intel.com>
Closes#14366 from yucai/subExpr_unused_codes.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid allocating some 0-length arrays, esp. in UTF8String, and by using Array.empty in Scala over Array[T]()
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14895 from srowen/SPARK-17331.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the ability to parse SQL (hexadecimal) binary literals (AKA bit strings). It follows the following syntax `X'[Hexadecimal Characters]+'`, for example: `X'01AB'` would create a binary the following binary array `0x01AB`.
If an uneven number of hexadecimal characters is passed, then the upper 4 bits of the initial byte are kept empty, and the lower 4 bits are filled using the first character. For example `X'1C7'` would create the following binary array `0x01C7`.
Binary data (Array[Byte]) does not have a proper `hashCode` and `equals` functions. This meant that comparing `Literal`s containing binary data was a pain. I have updated Literal.hashCode and Literal.equals to deal properly with binary data.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests to the `ExpressionParserSuite`, `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `ExpressionSQLBuilderSuite`.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#14832 from hvanhovell/SPARK-17263.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removing `semanticEquals()` from `SortOrder` because it can use the `semanticEquals()` provided by its parent class (`Expression`). This was as per suggestion by cloud-fan at 7192418b3a (r77106801)
## How was this patch tested?
Ran the test added in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841
Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>
Closes#14910 from tejasapatil/SPARK-17271_remove_semantic_ordering.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements aggregation function `percentile_approx`. Function `percentile_approx` returns the approximate percentile(s) of a column at the given percentage(s). A percentile is a watermark value below which a given percentage of the column values fall. For example, the percentile of column `col` at percentage 50% is the median value of column `col`.
### Syntax:
```
# Returns percentile at a given percentage value. The approximation error can be reduced by increasing parameter accuracy, at the cost of memory.
percentile_approx(col, percentage [, accuracy])
# Returns percentile value array at given percentage value array
percentile_approx(col, array(percentage1 [, percentage2]...) [, accuracy])
```
### Features:
1. This function supports partial aggregation.
2. The memory consumption is bounded. The larger `accuracy` parameter we choose, we smaller error we get. The default accuracy value is 10000, to match with Hive default setting. Choose a smaller value for smaller memory footprint.
3. This function supports window function aggregation.
### Example usages:
```
## Returns the 25th percentile value, with default accuracy
SELECT percentile_approx(col, 0.25) FROM table
## Returns an array of percentile value (25th, 50th, 75th), with default accuracy
SELECT percentile_approx(col, array(0.25, 0.5, 0.75)) FROM table
## Returns 25th percentile value, with custom accuracy value 100, larger accuracy parameter yields smaller approximation error
SELECT percentile_approx(col, 0.25, 100) FROM table
## Returns the 25th, and 50th percentile values, with custom accuracy value 100
SELECT percentile_approx(col, array(0.25, 0.5), 100) FROM table
```
### NOTE:
1. The `percentile_approx` implementation is different from Hive, so the result returned on same query maybe slightly different with Hive. This implementation uses `QuantileSummaries` as the underlying probabilistic data structure, and mainly follows paper `Space-efficient Online Computation of Quantile Summaries` by Greenwald, Michael and Khanna, Sanjeev. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/375663.375670)`
2. The current implementation of `QuantileSummaries` doesn't support automatic compression. This PR has a rule to do compression automatically at the caller side, but it may not be optimal.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test, and Sql query test.
## Acknowledgement
1. This PR's work in based on lw-lin's PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298, with improvements like supporting partial aggregation, fixing out of memory issue.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#14868 from clockfly/appro_percentile_try_2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR eliminates redundant cast from an `ArrayType` with `containsNull = false` or a `MapType` with `containsNull = false`.
For example, in `ArrayType` case, current implementation leaves a cast `cast(value#63 as array<double>).toDoubleArray`. However, we can eliminate `cast(value#63 as array<double>)` if we know `value#63` does not include `null`. This PR apply this elimination for `ArrayType` and `MapType` in `SimplifyCasts` at a plan optimization phase.
In summary, we got 1.2-1.3x performance improvements over the code before applying this PR.
Here are performance results of benchmark programs:
```
test("Read array in Dataset") {
import sparkSession.implicits._
val iters = 5
val n = 1024 * 1024
val rows = 15
val benchmark = new Benchmark("Read primnitive array", n)
val rand = new Random(511)
val intDS = sparkSession.sparkContext.parallelize(0 until rows, 1)
.map(i => Array.tabulate(n)(i => i)).toDS()
intDS.count() // force to create ds
val lastElement = n - 1
val randElement = rand.nextInt(lastElement)
benchmark.addCase(s"Read int array in Dataset", numIters = iters)(iter => {
val idx0 = randElement
val idx1 = lastElement
intDS.map(a => a(0) + a(idx0) + a(idx1)).collect
})
val doubleDS = sparkSession.sparkContext.parallelize(0 until rows, 1)
.map(i => Array.tabulate(n)(i => i.toDouble)).toDS()
doubleDS.count() // force to create ds
benchmark.addCase(s"Read double array in Dataset", numIters = iters)(iter => {
val idx0 = randElement
val idx1 = lastElement
doubleDS.map(a => a(0) + a(idx0) + a(idx1)).collect
})
benchmark.run()
}
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_92-b14 on Mac OS X 10.10.4
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5257U CPU 2.70GHz
without this PR
Read primnitive array: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read int array in Dataset 525 / 690 2.0 500.9 1.0X
Read double array in Dataset 947 / 1209 1.1 902.7 0.6X
with this PR
Read primnitive array: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read int array in Dataset 400 / 492 2.6 381.5 1.0X
Read double array in Dataset 788 / 870 1.3 751.4 0.5X
```
An example program that originally caused this performance issue.
```
val ds = Seq(Array(1.0, 2.0, 3.0), Array(4.0, 5.0, 6.0)).toDS()
val ds2 = ds.map(p => {
var s = 0.0
for (i <- 0 to 2) { s += p(i) }
s
})
ds2.show
ds2.explain(true)
```
Plans before this PR
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#68]
+- 'MapElements <function1>, obj#67: double
+- 'DeserializeToObject unresolveddeserializer(upcast(getcolumnbyordinal(0, ArrayType(DoubleType,false)), ArrayType(DoubleType,false), - root class: "scala.Array").toDoubleArray), obj#66: [D
+- LocalRelation [value#63]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: double
SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#68]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#67: double
+- DeserializeToObject cast(value#63 as array<double>).toDoubleArray, obj#66: [D
+- LocalRelation [value#63]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#68]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#67: double
+- DeserializeToObject cast(value#63 as array<double>).toDoubleArray, obj#66: [D
+- LocalRelation [value#63]
== Physical Plan ==
*SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#68]
+- *MapElements <function1>, obj#67: double
+- *DeserializeToObject cast(value#63 as array<double>).toDoubleArray, obj#66: [D
+- LocalTableScan [value#63]
```
Plans after this PR
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#6]
+- 'MapElements <function1>, obj#5: double
+- 'DeserializeToObject unresolveddeserializer(upcast(getcolumnbyordinal(0, ArrayType(DoubleType,false)), ArrayType(DoubleType,false), - root class: "scala.Array").toDoubleArray), obj#4: [D
+- LocalRelation [value#1]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: double
SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#6]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#5: double
+- DeserializeToObject cast(value#1 as array<double>).toDoubleArray, obj#4: [D
+- LocalRelation [value#1]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#6]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#5: double
+- DeserializeToObject value#1.toDoubleArray, obj#4: [D
+- LocalRelation [value#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*SerializeFromObject [input[0, double, true] AS value#6]
+- *MapElements <function1>, obj#5: double
+- *DeserializeToObject value#1.toDoubleArray, obj#4: [D
+- LocalTableScan [value#1]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Tested by new test cases in `SimplifyCastsSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#13704 from kiszk/SPARK-15985.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Hive Index tables are not supported by Spark SQL. Thus, we issue an exception when users try to access Hive Index tables. When the internal function `tableExists` tries to access Hive Index tables, it always gets the same error message: ```Hive index table is not supported```. This message could be confusing to users, since their SQL operations could be completely unrelated to Hive Index tables. For example, when users try to alter a table to a new name and there exists an index table with the same name, the expected exception should be a `TableAlreadyExistsException`.
This PR made the following changes:
- Introduced a new `AnalysisException` type: `SQLFeatureNotSupportedException`. When users try to access an `Index Table`, we will issue a `SQLFeatureNotSupportedException`.
- `tableExists` returns `true` when hitting a `SQLFeatureNotSupportedException` and the feature is `Hive index table`.
- Add a checking `requireTableNotExists` for `SessionCatalog`'s `createTable` API; otherwise, the current implementation relies on the Hive's internal checking.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14801 from gatorsmile/tableExists.
There's an unused `classTag` val in the AtomicType base class which is causing unnecessary slowness in deserialization because it needs to grab ScalaReflectionLock and create a new runtime reflection mirror. Removing this unused code gives a small but measurable performance boost in SQL task deserialization.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#14869 from JoshRosen/remove-unused-classtag.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR split the the single `createPartitions()` call into smaller batches, which could prevent Hive metastore from OOM (caused by millions of partitions).
It will also try to gather all the fast stats (number of files and total size of all files) in parallel to avoid the bottle neck of listing the files in metastore sequential, which is controlled by spark.sql.gatherFastStats (enabled by default).
## How was this patch tested?
Tested locally with 10000 partitions and 100 files with embedded metastore, without gathering fast stats in parallel, adding partitions took 153 seconds, after enable that, gathering the fast stats took about 34 seconds, adding these partitions took 25 seconds (most of the time spent in object store), 59 seconds in total, 2.5X faster (with larger cluster, gathering will much faster).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#14607 from davies/repair_batch.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17271
Planner is adding un-needed SORT operation due to bug in the way comparison for `SortOrder` is done at https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/EnsureRequirements.scala#L253
`SortOrder` needs to be compared semantically because `Expression` within two `SortOrder` can be "semantically equal" but not literally equal objects.
eg. In case of `sql("SELECT * FROM table1 a JOIN table2 b ON a.col1=b.col1")`
Expression in required SortOrder:
```
AttributeReference(
name = "col1",
dataType = LongType,
nullable = false
) (exprId = exprId,
qualifier = Some("a")
)
```
Expression in child SortOrder:
```
AttributeReference(
name = "col1",
dataType = LongType,
nullable = false
) (exprId = exprId)
```
Notice that the output column has a qualifier but the child attribute does not but the inherent expression is the same and hence in this case we can say that the child satisfies the required sort order.
This PR includes following changes:
- Added a `semanticEquals` method to `SortOrder` so that it can compare underlying child expressions semantically (and not using default Object.equals)
- Fixed `EnsureRequirements` to use semantic comparison of SortOrder
## How was this patch tested?
- Added a test case to `PlannerSuite`. Ran rest tests in `PlannerSuite`
Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>
Closes#14841 from tejasapatil/SPARK-17271_sort_order_equals_bug.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As part of breaking Optimizer.scala apart, this patch moves various join rules into a single file.
## How was this patch tested?
This should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14846 from rxin/SPARK-17274.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As part of breaking Optimizer.scala apart, this patch moves various expression optimization rules into a single file.
## How was this patch tested?
This should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14845 from rxin/SPARK-17273.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As part of breaking Optimizer.scala apart, this patch moves various subquery rules into a single file.
## How was this patch tested?
This should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14844 from rxin/SPARK-17272.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As part of breaking Optimizer.scala apart, this patch moves various finish analysis optimization stage rules into a single file. I'm submitting separate pull requests so we can more easily merge this in branch-2.0 to simplify optimizer backports.
## How was this patch tested?
This should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14838 from rxin/SPARK-17269.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As part of breaking Optimizer.scala apart, this patch moves various Dataset object optimization rules into a single file. I'm submitting separate pull requests so we can more easily merge this in branch-2.0 to simplify optimizer backports.
## How was this patch tested?
This should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14839 from rxin/SPARK-17270.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Given that non-deterministic expressions can be stateful, pushing them down the query plan during the optimization phase can cause incorrect behavior. This patch fixes that issue by explicitly disabling that.
## How was this patch tested?
A new test in `FilterPushdownSuite` that checks catalyst behavior for both deterministic and non-deterministic join conditions.
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameerag@cs.berkeley.edu>
Closes#14815 from sameeragarwal/constraint-inputfile.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds parser support for `BigDecimal` literals. If you append the suffix `BD` to a valid number then this will be interpreted as a `BigDecimal`, for example `12.0E10BD` will interpreted into a BigDecimal with scale -9 and precision 3. This is useful in situations where you need exact values.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `ExpressionParserSuite`, `ExpressionSQLBuilderSuite` and `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#14819 from hvanhovell/SPARK-17246.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
improve the document to make it easier to understand and also mention window operator.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#14822 from cloud-fan/object-agg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, type-widening does not work between `TimestampType` and `DateType`.
This applies to `SetOperation`, `Union`, `In`, `CaseWhen`, `Greatest`, `Leatest`, `CreateArray`, `CreateMap`, `Coalesce`, `NullIf`, `IfNull`, `Nvl` and `Nvl2`, .
This PR adds the support for widening `DateType` to `TimestampType` for them.
For a simple example,
**Before**
```scala
Seq(Tuple2(new Timestamp(0), new Date(0))).toDF("a", "b").selectExpr("greatest(a, b)").show()
```
shows below:
```
cannot resolve 'greatest(`a`, `b`)' due to data type mismatch: The expressions should all have the same type, got GREATEST(timestamp, date)
```
or union as below:
```scala
val a = Seq(Tuple1(new Timestamp(0))).toDF()
val b = Seq(Tuple1(new Date(0))).toDF()
a.union(b).show()
```
shows below:
```
Union can only be performed on tables with the compatible column types. DateType <> TimestampType at the first column of the second table;
```
**After**
```scala
Seq(Tuple2(new Timestamp(0), new Date(0))).toDF("a", "b").selectExpr("greatest(a, b)").show()
```
shows below:
```
+----------------------------------------------------+
|greatest(CAST(a AS TIMESTAMP), CAST(b AS TIMESTAMP))|
+----------------------------------------------------+
| 1969-12-31 16:00:...|
+----------------------------------------------------+
```
or union as below:
```scala
val a = Seq(Tuple1(new Timestamp(0))).toDF()
val b = Seq(Tuple1(new Date(0))).toDF()
a.union(b).show()
```
shows below:
```
+--------------------+
| _1|
+--------------------+
|1969-12-31 16:00:...|
|1969-12-31 00:00:...|
+--------------------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `TypeCoercionSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#14786 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17212.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces an abstract class `TypedImperativeAggregate` so that an aggregation function of TypedImperativeAggregate can use **arbitrary** user-defined Java object as intermediate aggregation buffer object.
**This has advantages like:**
1. It now can support larger category of aggregation functions. For example, it will be much easier to implement aggregation function `percentile_approx`, which has a complex aggregation buffer definition.
2. It can be used to avoid doing serialization/de-serialization for every call of `update` or `merge` when converting domain specific aggregation object to internal Spark-Sql storage format.
3. It is easier to integrate with other existing monoid libraries like algebird, and supports more aggregation functions with high performance.
Please see `org.apache.spark.sql.TypedImperativeAggregateSuite.TypedMaxAggregate` to find an example of how to defined a `TypedImperativeAggregate` aggregation function.
Please see Java doc of `TypedImperativeAggregate` and Jira ticket SPARK-17187 for more information.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#14753 from clockfly/object_aggregation_buffer_try_2.
This patch updates `Literal.sql` to properly generate SQL for `NaN` and `Infinity` float and double literals: these special values need to be handled differently from regular values, since simply appending a suffix to the value's `toString()` representation will not work for these values.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#14777 from JoshRosen/SPARK-17205.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix an incorrect outer join elimination when filter's `isNotNull` constraints is unable to filter out all null-supplying rows. For example, `isnotnull(coalesce(b#227, c#238))`.
Users can hit this error when they try to use `using/natural outer join`, which is converted to a normal outer join with a `coalesce` expression on the `using columns`. For example,
```Scala
val a = Seq((1, 2), (2, 3)).toDF("a", "b")
val b = Seq((2, 5), (3, 4)).toDF("a", "c")
val c = Seq((3, 1)).toDF("a", "d")
val ab = a.join(b, Seq("a"), "fullouter")
ab.join(c, "a").explain(true)
```
The dataframe `ab` is doing `using full-outer join`, which is converted to a normal outer join with a `coalesce` expression. Constraints inference generates a `Filter` with constraints `isnotnull(coalesce(b#227, c#238))`. Then, it triggers a wrong outer join elimination and generates a wrong result.
```
Project [a#251, b#227, c#237, d#247]
+- Join Inner, (a#251 = a#246)
:- Project [coalesce(a#226, a#236) AS a#251, b#227, c#237]
: +- Join FullOuter, (a#226 = a#236)
: :- Project [_1#223 AS a#226, _2#224 AS b#227]
: : +- LocalRelation [_1#223, _2#224]
: +- Project [_1#233 AS a#236, _2#234 AS c#237]
: +- LocalRelation [_1#233, _2#234]
+- Project [_1#243 AS a#246, _2#244 AS d#247]
+- LocalRelation [_1#243, _2#244]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [a#251, b#227, c#237, d#247]
+- Join Inner, (a#251 = a#246)
:- Project [coalesce(a#226, a#236) AS a#251, b#227, c#237]
: +- Filter isnotnull(coalesce(a#226, a#236))
: +- Join FullOuter, (a#226 = a#236)
: :- LocalRelation [a#226, b#227]
: +- LocalRelation [a#236, c#237]
+- LocalRelation [a#246, d#247]
```
**A note to the `Committer`**, please also give the credit to dongjoon-hyun who submitted another PR for fixing this issue. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14661 from gatorsmile/fixOuterJoinElimination.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `MapObjects` does not make copies of unsafe-backed data, leading to problems like [SPARK-17061](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17061) [SPARK-17093](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17093).
This patch makes `MapObjects` make copies of unsafe-backed data.
Generated code - prior to this patch:
```java
...
/* 295 */ if (isNull12) {
/* 296 */ convertedArray1[loopIndex1] = null;
/* 297 */ } else {
/* 298 */ convertedArray1[loopIndex1] = value12;
/* 299 */ }
...
```
Generated code - after this patch:
```java
...
/* 295 */ if (isNull12) {
/* 296 */ convertedArray1[loopIndex1] = null;
/* 297 */ } else {
/* 298 */ convertedArray1[loopIndex1] = value12 instanceof UnsafeRow? value12.copy() : value12;
/* 299 */ }
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Add a new test case which would fail without this patch.
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#14698 from lw-lin/mapobjects-copy.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since `HiveClient` is used to interact with the Hive metastore, it should be hidden in `HiveExternalCatalog`. After moving `HiveClient` into `HiveExternalCatalog`, `HiveSharedState` becomes a wrapper of `HiveExternalCatalog`. Thus, removal of `HiveSharedState` becomes straightforward. After removal of `HiveSharedState`, the reflection logic is directly applied on the choice of `ExternalCatalog` types, based on the configuration of `CATALOG_IMPLEMENTATION`.
~~`HiveClient` is also used/invoked by the other entities besides HiveExternalCatalog, we defines the following two APIs: getClient and getNewClient~~
### How was this patch tested?
The existing test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14757 from gatorsmile/removeHiveClient.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Given that filters based on non-deterministic constraints shouldn't be pushed down in the query plan, unnecessarily inferring them is confusing and a source of potential bugs. This patch simplifies the inferring logic by simply ignoring them.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test in `ConstraintPropagationSuite`.
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameerag@cs.berkeley.edu>
Closes#14795 from sameeragarwal/deterministic-constraints.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, two-word window functions like `row_number`, `dense_rank`, `percent_rank`, and `cume_dist` are expressed without `_` in error messages. We had better show the correct names.
**Before**
```scala
scala> sql("select row_number()").show
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot evaluate expression: rownumber()
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select row_number()").show
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot evaluate expression: row_number()
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins and manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14571 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16983.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Actually Spark SQL doesn't support index, the catalog table type `INDEX` is from Hive. However, most operations in Spark SQL can't handle index table, e.g. create table, alter table, etc.
Logically index table should be invisible to end users, and Hive also generates special table name for index table to avoid users accessing it directly. Hive has special SQL syntax to create/show/drop index tables.
At Spark SQL side, although we can describe index table directly, but the result is unreadable, we should use the dedicated SQL syntax to do it(e.g. `SHOW INDEX ON tbl`). Spark SQL can also read index table directly, but the result is always empty.(Can hive read index table directly?)
This PR remove the table type `INDEX`, to make it clear that Spark SQL doesn't support index currently.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#14752 from cloud-fan/minor2.
When Spark emits SQL for a string literal, it should wrap the string in single quotes, not double quotes. Databases which adhere more strictly to the ANSI SQL standards, such as Postgres, allow only single-quotes to be used for denoting string literals (see http://stackoverflow.com/a/1992331/590203).
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#14763 from JoshRosen/SPARK-17194.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use `CatalystConf.resolver` consistently for case-sensitivity comparison (removed dups).
## How was this patch tested?
Local build. Waiting for Jenkins to ensure clean build and test.
Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>
Closes#14771 from jaceklaskowski/17199-catalystconf-resolver.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a sub-task of [SPARK-16283](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16283) (Implement percentile_approx SQL function), which moves class QuantileSummaries to project catalyst so that it can be reused when implementing aggregation function `percentile_approx`.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR only does class relocation, class implementation is not changed.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#14754 from clockfly/move_QuantileSummaries_to_catalyst.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR marks the abstract class `Collect` as non-deterministic since the results of `CollectList` and `CollectSet` depend on the actual order of input rows.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases should be enough.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#14749 from liancheng/spark-17182-non-deterministic-collect.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The range operator previously didn't support SQL generation, which made it not possible to use in views.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
cc hvanhovell
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#14724 from ericl/spark-17162.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In 2.0, we change the threshold of splitting expressions from 16K to 64K, which cause very bad performance on wide table, because the generated method can't be JIT compiled by default (above the limit of 8K bytecode).
This PR will decrease it to 1K, based on the benchmark results for a wide table with 400 columns of LongType.
It also fix a bug around splitting expression in whole-stage codegen (it should not split them).
## How was this patch tested?
Added benchmark suite.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#14692 from davies/split_exprs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `NullPropagation` optimizer replaces `COUNT` on null literals in a bottom-up fashion. During that, `WindowExpression` is not covered properly. This PR adds the missing propagation logic.
**Before**
```scala
scala> sql("SELECT COUNT(1 + NULL) OVER ()").show
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot evaluate expression: cast(0 as bigint) windowspecdefinition(ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("SELECT COUNT(1 + NULL) OVER ()").show
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|count((1 + CAST(NULL AS INT))) OVER (ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)|
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 0|
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins test with a new test case.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14689 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-17098.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds support for SQL generation for inline tables. With this, it would be possible to create a view that depends on inline tables.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case in LogicalPlanToSQLSuite.
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14709 from petermaxlee/SPARK-17150.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modifies error message for numeric literals to
Numeric literal <literal> does not fit in range [min, max] for type <T>
## How was this patch tested?
Fixed up the error messages for literals.sql in SqlQueryTestSuite and re-ran via sbt. Also fixed up error messages in ExpressionParserSuite
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#14721 from srinathshankar/sc4296.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch creates array.sql in SQLQueryTestSuite for testing array related functions, including:
- indexing
- array creation
- size
- array_contains
- sort_array
## How was this patch tested?
The patch itself is about adding tests.
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14708 from petermaxlee/SPARK-17149.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch changes predicate pushdown optimization rule (PushDownPredicate) from using a blacklist to a whitelist. That is to say, operators must be explicitly allowed. This approach is more future-proof: previously it was possible for us to introduce a new operator and then render the optimization rule incorrect.
This also fixes the bug that previously we allowed pushing filter beneath limit, which was incorrect. That is to say, before this patch, the optimizer would rewrite
```
select * from (select * from range(10) limit 5) where id > 3
to
select * from range(10) where id > 3 limit 5
```
## How was this patch tested?
- a unit test case in FilterPushdownSuite
- an end-to-end test in limit.sql
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14713 from rxin/SPARK-16994.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves inline table support with the following:
1. Support type coercion.
2. Support using foldable expressions. Previously only literals were supported.
3. Improve error message handling.
4. Improve test coverage.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new unit test suite ResolveInlineTablesSuite and a new file-based end-to-end test inline-table.sql.
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14676 from petermaxlee/SPARK-16947.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes the problem described in SPARK-17117, i.e. "SELECT 1 / NULL" throws an analysis exception:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(1 / NULL)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(1 / NULL)' (int and null).
```
The problem is that division type coercion did not take null type into account.
## How was this patch tested?
A unit test for the type coercion, and a few end-to-end test cases using SQLQueryTestSuite.
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14695 from petermaxlee/SPARK-17117.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds analyzer rules for resolving table-valued functions, and adds one builtin implementation for range(). The arguments for range() are the same as those of `spark.range()`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
cc hvanhovell
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#14656 from ericl/sc-4309.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `Optimizer` rules `PushThroughSetOperations` and `PushDownPredicate` have a redundant rule to push down `Filter` through `Union`. We should remove it.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#14687 from viirya/remove-extra-pushdown.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I was looking at the code for UnresolvedOrdinal and made a few small changes to make it slightly more clear:
1. Rename the rule to SubstituteUnresolvedOrdinals which is more consistent with other rules that start with verbs. Note that this is still inconsistent with CTESubstitution and WindowsSubstitution.
2. Broke the test suite down from a single test case to three test cases.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a minor cleanup.
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14672 from petermaxlee/SPARK-17034.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A TreeNodeException is thrown when executing the following minimal example in Spark 2.0.
import spark.implicits._
case class test (x: Int, q: Int)
val d = Seq(1).toDF("x")
d.withColumn("q", lit(0)).as[test].groupByKey(_.x).flatMapGroups{case (x, iter) => List[Int]()}.show
d.withColumn("q", expr("0")).as[test].groupByKey(_.x).flatMapGroups{case (x, iter) => List[Int]()}.show
The problem is at `FoldablePropagation`. The rule will do `transformExpressions` on `LogicalPlan`. The query above contains a `MapGroups` which has a parameter `dataAttributes:Seq[Attribute]`. One attributes in `dataAttributes` will be transformed to an `Alias(literal(0), _)` in `FoldablePropagation`. `Alias` is not an `Attribute` and causes the error.
We can't easily detect such type inconsistency during transforming expressions. A direct approach to this problem is to skip doing `FoldablePropagation` on object operators as they should not contain such expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#14648 from viirya/flat-mapping.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current subquery expression interface contains a little bit of technical debt in the form of a few different access paths to get and set the query contained by the expression. This is confusing to anyone who goes over this code.
This PR unifies these access paths.
## How was this patch tested?
(Existing tests)
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#14685 from hvanhovell/SPARK-17106.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR splits the generated code for ```SafeProjection.apply``` by using ```ctx.splitExpressions()```. This is because the large code body for ```NewInstance``` may grow beyond 64KB bytecode size for ```apply()``` method.
Here is [the original PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13243) for SPARK-15285. However, it breaks a build with Scala 2.10 since Scala 2.10 does not a case class with large number of members. Thus, it was reverted by [this commit](fa244e5a90).
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests by using `DefinedByConstructorParams` instead of case class for scala-2.10
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#14670 from kiszk/SPARK-15285-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently methods in `ParserUtils` are tested indirectly, we should add test cases in `ParserUtilsSuite` to verify their integrity directly.
## How was this patch tested?
New test cases in `ParserUtilsSuite`
Author: jiangxingbo <jiangxb1987@gmail.com>
Closes#14620 from jiangxb1987/parserUtils.
