## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we do an average, the result is computed dividing the sum of the values by their count. In the case the result is a DecimalType, the way we are casting/managing the precision and scale is not really optimized and it is not coherent with what we do normally.
In particular, a problem can happen when the `Divide` operand returns a result which contains a precision and scale different by the ones which are expected as output of the `Divide` operand. In the case reported in the JIRA, for instance, the result of the `Divide` operand is a `Decimal(38, 36)`, while the output data type for `Divide` is 38, 22. This is not an issue when the `Divide` is followed by a `CheckOverflow` or a `Cast` to the right data type, as these operations return a decimal with the defined precision and scale. Despite in the `Average` operator we do have a `Cast`, this may be bypassed if the result of `Divide` is the same type which it is casted to, hence the issue reported in the JIRA may arise.
The PR proposes to use the normal rules/handling of the arithmetic operators with Decimal data type, so we both reuse the existing code (having a single logic for operations between decimals) and we fix this problem as the result is always guarded by `CheckOverflow`.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21910 from mgaido91/SPARK-24957.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements INTERSECT ALL clause through query rewrites using existing operators in Spark. Please refer to [Link](https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nyW0T0b_ajUduQoPgZLAsyHK8s3_dko3ulQuxaLpUXE) for the design.
Input Query
``` SQL
SELECT c1 FROM ut1 INTERSECT ALL SELECT c1 FROM ut2
```
Rewritten Query
```SQL
SELECT c1
FROM (
SELECT replicate_row(min_count, c1)
FROM (
SELECT c1,
IF (vcol1_cnt > vcol2_cnt, vcol2_cnt, vcol1_cnt) AS min_count
FROM (
SELECT c1, count(vcol1) as vcol1_cnt, count(vcol2) as vcol2_cnt
FROM (
SELECT c1, true as vcol1, null as vcol2 FROM ut1
UNION ALL
SELECT c1, null as vcol1, true as vcol2 FROM ut2
) AS union_all
GROUP BY c1
HAVING vcol1_cnt >= 1 AND vcol2_cnt >= 1
)
)
)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases in SQLQueryTestSuite, DataFrameSuite, SetOperationSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21886 from dilipbiswal/dkb_intersect_all_final.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Update DateTimeUtilsSuite so that when testing roundtripping in daysToMillis and millisToDays multiple skipdates can be specified.
- Updated test so that both new years eve 2014 and new years day 2015 are skipped for kiribati time zones. This is necessary as java versions pre 181-b13 considered new years day 2015 to be skipped while susequent versions corrected this to new years eve.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: Chris Martin <chris@cmartinit.co.uk>
Closes#21901 from d80tb7/SPARK-24950_datetimeUtilsSuite_failures.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements EXCEPT ALL clause through query rewrites using existing operators in Spark. In this PR, an internal UDTF (replicate_rows) is added to aid in preserving duplicate rows. Please refer to [Link](https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nyW0T0b_ajUduQoPgZLAsyHK8s3_dko3ulQuxaLpUXE) for the design.
**Note** This proposed UDTF is kept as a internal function that is purely used to aid with this particular rewrite to give us flexibility to change to a more generalized UDTF in future.
Input Query
``` SQL
SELECT c1 FROM ut1 EXCEPT ALL SELECT c1 FROM ut2
```
Rewritten Query
```SQL
SELECT c1
FROM (
SELECT replicate_rows(sum_val, c1)
FROM (
SELECT c1, sum_val
FROM (
SELECT c1, sum(vcol) AS sum_val
FROM (
SELECT 1L as vcol, c1 FROM ut1
UNION ALL
SELECT -1L as vcol, c1 FROM ut2
) AS union_all
GROUP BY union_all.c1
)
WHERE sum_val > 0
)
)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases in SQLQueryTestSuite, DataFrameSuite and SetOperationSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21857 from dilipbiswal/dkb_except_all_final.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I added new option for Avro datasource - `compression`. The option allows to specify compression codec for saved Avro files. This option is similar to `compression` option in another datasources like `JSON` and `CSV`.
Also I added the SQL configs `spark.sql.avro.compression.codec` and `spark.sql.avro.deflate.level`. I put the configs into `SQLConf`. If the `compression` option is not specified by an user, the first SQL config is taken into account.
## How was this patch tested?
I added new test which read meta info from written avro files and checks `avro.codec` property.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21837 from MaxGekk/avro-compression.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new collection function: shuffle. It generates a random permutation of the given array. This implementation uses the "inside-out" version of Fisher-Yates algorithm.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests are added to CollectionExpressionsSuite.scala and DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Author: pkuwm <ihuizhi.lu@gmail.com>
Closes#21802 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23928/shuffle.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AnalysisBarrier was introduced in SPARK-20392 to improve analysis speed (don't re-analyze nodes that have already been analyzed).
Before AnalysisBarrier, we already had some infrastructure in place, with analysis specific functions (resolveOperators and resolveExpressions). These functions do not recursively traverse down subplans that are already analyzed (with a mutable boolean flag _analyzed). The issue with the old system was that developers started using transformDown, which does a top-down traversal of the plan tree, because there was not top-down resolution function, and as a result analyzer performance became pretty bad.
In order to fix the issue in SPARK-20392, AnalysisBarrier was introduced as a special node and for this special node, transform/transformUp/transformDown don't traverse down. However, the introduction of this special node caused a lot more troubles than it solves. This implicit node breaks assumptions and code in a few places, and it's hard to know when analysis barrier would exist, and when it wouldn't. Just a simple search of AnalysisBarrier in PR discussions demonstrates it is a source of bugs and additional complexity.
Instead, this pull request removes AnalysisBarrier and reverts back to the old approach. We added infrastructure in tests that fail explicitly if transform methods are used in the analyzer.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test suite AnalysisHelperSuite for testing the resolve* methods and transform* methods.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21822 from rxin/SPARK-24865.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is an extension to the original PR, in which rule exclusion did not work for classes derived from Optimizer, e.g., SparkOptimizer.
To solve this issue, Optimizer and its derived classes will define/override `defaultBatches` and `nonExcludableRules` in order to define its default rule set as well as rules that cannot be excluded by the SQL config. In the meantime, Optimizer's `batches` method is dedicated to the rule exclusion logic and is defined "final".
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21876 from maryannxue/rule-exclusion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If we use `reverse` function for array type of primitive type containing `null` and the child array is `UnsafeArrayData`, the function returns a wrong result because `UnsafeArrayData` doesn't define the behavior of re-assignment, especially we can't set a valid value after we set `null`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21830 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24878/fix_reverse.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Besides spark setting spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode also allow setting partitionOverWriteMode per write
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test in InsertSuite
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com>
Closes#21818 from koertkuipers/feat-partition-overwrite-mode-per-write.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extend the `StructType`/`StructField` classes by new method `toDDL` which converts a value of the `StructType`/`StructField` type to a string formatted in DDL style. The resulted string can be used in a table creation.
The `toDDL` method of `StructField` is reused in `SHOW CREATE TABLE`. In this way the PR fixes the bug of unquoted names of nested fields.
## How was this patch tested?
I add a test for checking the new method and 2 round trip tests: `fromDDL` -> `toDDL` and `toDDL` -> `fromDDL`
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21803 from MaxGekk/to-ddl.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improvement `IN` predicate type mismatched message:
```sql
Mismatched columns:
[(, t, 4, ., `, t, 4, a, `, :, d, o, u, b, l, e, ,, , t, 5, ., `, t, 5, a, `, :, d, e, c, i, m, a, l, (, 1, 8, ,, 0, ), ), (, t, 4, ., `, t, 4, c, `, :, s, t, r, i, n, g, ,, , t, 5, ., `, t, 5, c, `, :, b, i, g, i, n, t, )]
```
After this patch:
```sql
Mismatched columns:
[(t4.`t4a`:double, t5.`t5a`:decimal(18,0)), (t4.`t4c`:string, t5.`t5c`:bigint)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21863 from wangyum/SPARK-18874.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Thanks to henryr for the original idea at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21049
Description from the original PR :
Subqueries (at least in SQL) have 'bag of tuples' semantics. Ordering
them is therefore redundant (unless combined with a limit).
This patch removes the top sort operators from the subquery plans.
This closes https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21049.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases in SubquerySuite to cover in, exists and scalar subqueries.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21853 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-23957.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `trueValue` and `falseValue` are semantic equivalence, the condition expression in `if` can be removed to avoid extra computation in runtime.
## How was this patch tested?
Test added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21848 from dbtsai/short-circuit-if.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The HandleNullInputsForUDF would always add a new `If` node every time it is applied. That would cause a difference between the same plan being analyzed once and being analyzed twice (or more), thus raising issues like plan not matched in the cache manager. The solution is to mark the arguments as null-checked, which is to add a "KnownNotNull" node above those arguments, when adding the UDF under an `If` node, because clearly the UDF will not be called when any of those arguments is null.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new tests under sql/UDFSuite and AnalysisSuite.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21851 from maryannxue/spark-24891.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Last Access Time will always displayed wrong date Thu Jan 01 05:30:00 IST 1970 when user run DESC FORMATTED table command
In hive its displayed as "UNKNOWN" which makes more sense than displaying wrong date. seems to be a limitation as of now even from hive, better we can follow the hive behavior unless the limitation has been resolved from hive.
spark client output
Hive client output
## How was this patch tested?
UT has been added which makes sure that the wrong date "Thu Jan 01 05:30:00 IST 1970 "
shall not be added as value for the Last Access property
Author: s71955 <sujithchacko.2010@gmail.com>
Closes#21775 from sujith71955/master_hive.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's minor and trivial but looks 2000 input is good enough to reproduce and test in SPARK-22499.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually brought the change and tested.
Locally tested:
Before: 3m 21s 288ms
After: 1m 29s 134ms
Given the latest successful build took:
```
ArithmeticExpressionSuite:
- SPARK-22499: Least and greatest should not generate codes beyond 64KB (7 minutes, 49 seconds)
```
I expect it's going to save 4ish mins.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21855 from HyukjinKwon/minor-fix-suite.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modified the canonicalized to not case-insensitive.
Before the PR, cache can't work normally if there are case letters in SQL,
for example:
sql("CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS src (key INT, value STRING) USING hive")
sql("select key, sum(case when Key > 0 then 1 else 0 end) as positiveNum " +
"from src group by key").cache().createOrReplaceTempView("src_cache")
sql(
s"""select a.key
from
(select key from src_cache where positiveNum = 1)a
left join
(select key from src_cache )b
on a.key=b.key
""").explain
The physical plan of the sql is:
The subquery "select key from src_cache where positiveNum = 1" on the left of join can use the cache data, but the subquery "select key from src_cache" on the right of join cannot use the cache data.
## How was this patch tested?
new added test
Author: 10129659 <chen.yanshan@zte.com.cn>
Closes#21823 from eatoncys/canonicalized.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the strategy in ColumnPruning to add a Project between ScriptTransformation and its child, this strategy can reduce the scan time especially in the scenario of the table has many columns.
## How was this patch tested?
Add UT in ColumnPruningSuite and ScriptTransformationSuite.
Author: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Closes#21839 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-24339.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since Spark has provided fairly clear interfaces for adding user-defined optimization rules, it would be nice to have an easy-to-use interface for excluding an optimization rule from the Spark query optimizer as well.
This would make customizing Spark optimizer easier and sometimes could debugging issues too.
- Add a new config spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules, with the value being a list of rule names separated by comma.
- Modify the current batches method to remove the excluded rules from the default batches. Log the rules that have been excluded.
- Split the existing default batches into "post-analysis batches" and "optimization batches" so that only rules in the "optimization batches" can be excluded.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a new test suite: OptimizerRuleExclusionSuite
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21764 from maryannxue/rule-exclusion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add a new function from_avro for parsing a binary column of avro format and converting it into its corresponding catalyst value.
2. Add a new function to_avro for converting a column into binary of avro format with the specified schema.
I created #21774 for this, but it failed the build https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/spark-master-compile-maven-hadoop-2.6/7902/
Additional changes In this PR:
1. Add `scalacheck` dependency in pom.xml to resolve the failure.
2. Update the `log4j.properties` to make it consistent with other modules.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Compile with different commands:
```
./build/mvn --force -DzincPort=3643 -DskipTests -Phadoop-2.6 -Phive-thriftserver -Pkinesis-asl -Pspark-ganglia-lgpl -Pmesos -Pyarn compile test-compile
./build/mvn --force -DzincPort=3643 -DskipTests -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive-thriftserver -Pkinesis-asl -Pspark-ganglia-lgpl -Pmesos -Pyarn compile test-compile
./build/mvn --force -DzincPort=3643 -DskipTests -Phadoop-3.1 -Phive-thriftserver -Pkinesis-asl -Pspark-ganglia-lgpl -Pmesos -Pyarn compile test-compile
```
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21838 from gengliangwang/from_and_to_avro.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the Analyzer throws an exception if your try to nest a generator. However, it special cases generators "nested" in an alias, and allows that. If you try to alias a generator twice, it is not caught by the special case, so an exception is thrown.
This PR trims the unnecessary, non-top-level aliases, so that the generator is allowed.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in AnalysisSuite.
Author: Brandon Krieger <bkrieger@palantir.com>
Closes#21508 from bkrieger/bk/SPARK-24488.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new function from_avro for parsing a binary column of avro format and converting it into its corresponding catalyst value.
Add a new function to_avro for converting a column into binary of avro format with the specified schema.
This PR is in progress. Will add test cases.
## How was this patch tested?
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21774 from gengliangwang/from_and_to_avro.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `Concat` and `MapConcat` to:
- avoid creating concatenator object for each row.
- make `Concat` handle `containsNull` properly.
- make `Concat` shortcut if `null` child is found.
## How was this patch tested?
Added some tests and existing tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21824 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24871/refactor_concat_mapconcat.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enhances the parser and analyzer to support ANSI compliant syntax for GROUPING SET. As part of this change we derive the grouping expressions from user supplied groupings in the grouping sets clause.
```SQL
SELECT c1, c2, max(c3)
FROM t1
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((c1), (c1, c2))
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in SQLQueryTestSuite and ResolveGroupingAnalyticsSuite.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21813 from dilipbiswal/spark-24424.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As stated in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21321, in the error messages we should use `catalogString`. This is not the case, as SPARK-22893 used `simpleString` in order to have the same representation everywhere and it missed some places.
The PR unifies the messages using alway the `catalogString` representation of the dataTypes in the messages.
## How was this patch tested?
existing/modified UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21804 from mgaido91/SPARK-24268_catalog.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Made ExprId hashCode independent of jvmId to make canonicalization independent of JVM, by overriding hashCode (and necessarily also equality) to depend on id only
## How was this patch tested?
Created a unit test ExprIdSuite
Ran all unit tests of sql/catalyst
Author: Ger van Rossum <gvr@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#21806 from gvr/spark24846-canonicalization.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the group state of user-defined-type is encoded as top-level columns in the UnsafeRows stores in the state store. The timeout timestamp is also saved as (when needed) as the last top-level column. Since the group state is serialized to top-level columns, you cannot save "null" as a value of state (setting null in all the top-level columns is not equivalent). So we don't let the user set the timeout without initializing the state for a key. Based on user experience, this leads to confusion.
This PR is to change the row format such that the state is saved as nested columns. This would allow the state to be set to null, and avoid these confusing corner cases. However, queries recovering from existing checkpoint will use the previous format to maintain compatibility with existing production queries.
## How was this patch tested?
Refactored existing end-to-end tests and added new tests for explicitly testing obj-to-row conversion for both state formats.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21739 from tdas/SPARK-22187-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes breaking down configuration of retaining batch size on state into two pieces: files and in memory (cache). While this patch reuses existing configuration for files, it introduces new configuration, "spark.sql.streaming.maxBatchesToRetainInMemory" to configure max count of batch to retain in memory.
## How was this patch tested?
Apply this patch on top of SPARK-24441 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469), and manually tested in various workloads to ensure overall size of states in memory is around 2x or less of the size of latest version of state, while it was 10x ~ 80x before applying the patch.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21700 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24717.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix regexes in spark-sql command examples.
This takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18477
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. I verified the existing example doesn't work in spark-sql, but new ones does.
Author: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Closes#21808 from srowen/SPARK-21261.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Extend the Parser to enable parsing a column list as the pivot column.
2. Extend the Parser and the Pivot node to enable parsing complex expressions with aliases as the pivot value.
3. Add type check and constant check in Analyzer for Pivot node.
## How was this patch tested?
Add tests in pivot.sql
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21720 from maryannxue/spark-24164.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Two new rules in the logical plan optimizers are added.
1. When there is only one element in the **`Collection`**, the
physical plan will be optimized to **`EqualTo`**, so predicate
pushdown can be used.
```scala
profileDF.filter( $"profileID".isInCollection(Set(6))).explain(true)
"""
|== Physical Plan ==
|*(1) Project [profileID#0]
|+- *(1) Filter (isnotnull(profileID#0) && (profileID#0 = 6))
| +- *(1) FileScan parquet [profileID#0] Batched: true, Format: Parquet,
| PartitionFilters: [],
| PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(profileID), EqualTo(profileID,6)],
| ReadSchema: struct<profileID:int>
""".stripMargin
```
2. When the **`Collection`** is empty, and the input is nullable, the
logical plan will be simplified to
```scala
profileDF.filter( $"profileID".isInCollection(Set())).explain(true)
"""
|== Optimized Logical Plan ==
|Filter if (isnull(profileID#0)) null else false
|+- Relation[profileID#0] parquet
""".stripMargin
```
TODO:
1. For multiple conditions with numbers less than certain thresholds,
we should still allow predicate pushdown.
2. Optimize the **`In`** using **`tableswitch`** or **`lookupswitch`**
when the numbers of the categories are low, and they are **`Int`**,
**`Long`**.
3. The default immutable hash trees set is slow for query, and we
should do benchmark for using different set implementation for faster
query.
4. **`filter(if (condition) null else false)`** can be optimized to false.
## How was this patch tested?
Couple new tests are added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21797 from dbtsai/optimize-in.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the non-negative checks of window start time to make window support negative start time, and add a check to guarantee the absolute value of start time is less than slide duration.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests.
Author: HanShuliang <kevinzwx1992@gmail.com>
Closes#18903 from KevinZwx/dev.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR tries to avoid serialization of private fields of already added collection functions and follows up on comments in [SPARK-23922](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21028) and [SPARK-23935](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21236)
## How was this patch tested?
Run tests from:
- CollectionExpressionSuite.scala
- DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala
Author: Marek Novotny <mn.mikke@gmail.com>
Closes#21352 from mn-mikke/SPARK-24305.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Two new rules in the logical plan optimizers are added.
1. When there is only one element in the **`Collection`**, the
physical plan will be optimized to **`EqualTo`**, so predicate
pushdown can be used.
```scala
profileDF.filter( $"profileID".isInCollection(Set(6))).explain(true)
"""
|== Physical Plan ==
|*(1) Project [profileID#0]
|+- *(1) Filter (isnotnull(profileID#0) && (profileID#0 = 6))
| +- *(1) FileScan parquet [profileID#0] Batched: true, Format: Parquet,
| PartitionFilters: [],
| PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(profileID), EqualTo(profileID,6)],
| ReadSchema: struct<profileID:int>
""".stripMargin
```
2. When the **`Collection`** is empty, and the input is nullable, the
logical plan will be simplified to
```scala
profileDF.filter( $"profileID".isInCollection(Set())).explain(true)
"""
|== Optimized Logical Plan ==
|Filter if (isnull(profileID#0)) null else false
|+- Relation[profileID#0] parquet
""".stripMargin
```
TODO:
1. For multiple conditions with numbers less than certain thresholds,
we should still allow predicate pushdown.
2. Optimize the **`In`** using **`tableswitch`** or **`lookupswitch`**
when the numbers of the categories are low, and they are **`Int`**,
**`Long`**.
3. The default immutable hash trees set is slow for query, and we
should do benchmark for using different set implementation for faster
query.
4. **`filter(if (condition) null else false)`** can be optimized to false.
## How was this patch tested?
Couple new tests are added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21442 from dbtsai/optimize-in.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have some functions which need to aware the nullabilities of all children, such as `CreateArray`, `CreateMap`, `Concat`, and so on. Currently we add casts to fix the nullabilities, but the casts might be removed during the optimization phase.
After the discussion, we decided to not add extra casts for just fixing the nullabilities of the nested types, but handle them by functions themselves.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified and added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21704 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24734/concat_containsnull.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support Decimal type push down to the parquet data sources.
The Decimal comparator used is: [`BINARY_AS_SIGNED_INTEGER_COMPARATOR`](c6764c4a08/parquet-column/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/schema/PrimitiveComparator.java (L224-L292)).
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests.
**manual tests**:
```scala
spark.range(10000000).selectExpr("id", "cast(id as decimal(9)) as d1", "cast(id as decimal(9, 2)) as d2", "cast(id as decimal(18)) as d3", "cast(id as decimal(18, 4)) as d4", "cast(id as decimal(38)) as d5", "cast(id as decimal(38, 18)) as d6").coalesce(1).write.option("parquet.block.size", 1048576).parquet("/tmp/spark/parquet/decimal")
val df = spark.read.parquet("/tmp/spark/parquet/decimal/")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.decimal=true")
// Only read about 1 MB data
df.filter("d2 = 10000").show
// Only read about 1 MB data
df.filter("d4 = 10000").show
spark.sql("set spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.decimal=false")
// Read 174.3 MB data
df.filter("d2 = 10000").show
// Read 174.3 MB data
df.filter("d4 = 10000").show
```
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21556 from wangyum/SPARK-24549.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Timestamp` support pushdown to parquet data source.
Only `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` and `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` support push down.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and benchmark tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21741 from wangyum/SPARK-24718.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The original pr is: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424
Add a new optimizer rule to convert an IN predicate to an equivalent Parquet filter and add `spark.sql.parquet.pushdown.inFilterThreshold` to control limit thresholds. Different data types have different limit thresholds, this is a copy of data for reference:
Type | limit threshold
-- | --
string | 370
int | 210
long | 285
double | 270
float | 220
decimal | Won't provide better performance before [SPARK-24549](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24549)
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21603 from wangyum/SPARK-17091.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we use a reference from Dataset in filter or sort, which was not used in the prior select, an AnalysisException occurs, e.g.,
```scala
val df = Seq(("test1", 0), ("test2", 1)).toDF("name", "id")
df.select(df("name")).filter(df("id") === 0).show()
```
```scala
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Resolved attribute(s) id#6 missing from name#5 in operator !Filter (id#6 = 0).;;
!Filter (id#6 = 0)
+- AnalysisBarrier
+- Project [name#5]
+- Project [_1#2 AS name#5, _2#3 AS id#6]
+- LocalRelation [_1#2, _2#3]
```
This change updates the rule `ResolveMissingReferences` so `Filter` and `Sort` with non-empty `missingInputs` will also be transformed.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#21745 from viirya/SPARK-24781.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR will cache the function name from external catalog, it is used by lookupFunctions in the analyzer, and it is cached for each query plan. The original problem is reported in the [ spark-19737](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19737)
## How was this patch tested?
create new test file LookupFunctionsSuite and add test case in SessionCatalogSuite
Author: Kevin Yu <qyu@us.ibm.com>
Closes#20795 from kevinyu98/spark-23486.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Relax the check to allow complex aggregate expressions, like `ceil(sum(col1))` or `sum(col1) + 1`, which roughly means any aggregate expression that could appear in an Aggregate plan except pandas UDF (due to the fact that it is not supported in pivot yet).
## How was this patch tested?
Added 2 tests in pivot.sql
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21753 from maryannxue/pivot-relax-syntax.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is a followup to move the test cases introduced by the original PR in their proper location.
## How was this patch tested?
moved UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21751 from mgaido91/SPARK-24208_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_union`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
This function returns returns an array of the elements in the union of array1 and array2.
Note: The order of elements in the result is not defined.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21061 from kiszk/SPARK-23914.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables a Java bytecode check tool [spotbugs](https://spotbugs.github.io/) to avoid possible integer overflow at multiplication. When an violation is detected, the build process is stopped.
Due to the tool limitation, some other checks will be enabled. In this PR, [these patterns](http://spotbugs-in-kengo-toda.readthedocs.io/en/lqc-list-detectors/detectors.html#findpuzzlers) in `FindPuzzlers` can be detected.
This check is enabled at `compile` phase. Thus, `mvn compile` or `mvn package` launches this check.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21542 from kiszk/SPARK-24529.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extend `RuntimeConfig` by new method `isModifiable()` which returns `true` if a config parameter can be modified at runtime (for current session state). For static SQL and core parameters, the method returns `false`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test to `RuntimeConfigSuite` for checking Spark core and SQL parameters.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21730 from MaxGekk/is-modifiable.
