### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this pull request, we are going to support `SET OWNER` syntax for databases and namespaces,
```sql
ALTER (DATABASE|SCHEME|NAMESPACE) database_name SET OWNER [USER|ROLE|GROUP] user_or_role_group;
```
Before this commit 332e252a14, we didn't care much about ownerships for the catalog objects. In 332e252a14, we determined to use properties to store ownership staff, and temporarily used `alter database ... set dbproperties ...` to support switch ownership of a database. This PR aims to use the formal syntax to replace it.
In hive, `ownerName/Type` are fields of the database objects, also they can be normal properties.
```
create schema test1 with dbproperties('ownerName'='yaooqinn')
```
The create/alter database syntax will not change the owner to `yaooqinn` but store it in parameters. e.g.
```
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------------+--+
| db_name | comment | location | owner_name | owner_type | parameters |
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------------+--+
| test1 | | hdfs://quickstart.cloudera:8020/user/hive/warehouse/test1.db | anonymous | USER | {ownerName=yaooqinn} |
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-----------------------+--+
```
In this pull request, because we let the `ownerName` become reversed, so it will neither change the owner nor store in dbproperties, just be omitted silently.
## Why are the changes needed?
Formal syntax support for changing database ownership
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, add a new syntax
### How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Closes#26775 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30018.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revert https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20433 .
### Why are the changes needed?
According to the SQL standard, the INTERVAL prefix is required:
```
<interval literal> ::=
INTERVAL [ <sign> ] <interval string> <interval qualifier>
<interval string> ::=
<quote> <unquoted interval string> <quote>
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, but omitting the INTERVAL prefix is a new feature in 3.0
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27080 from cloud-fan/interval.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The filter predicate for aggregate expression is an `ANSI SQL`.
```
<aggregate function> ::=
COUNT <left paren> <asterisk> <right paren> [ <filter clause> ]
| <general set function> [ <filter clause> ]
| <binary set function> [ <filter clause> ]
| <ordered set function> [ <filter clause> ]
| <array aggregate function> [ <filter clause> ]
| <row pattern count function> [ <filter clause> ]
```
There are some mainstream database support this syntax.
**PostgreSQL:**
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES
For example:
```
SELECT
year,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE gdp_per_capita >= 40000)
FROM
countries
GROUP BY
year
```
```
SELECT
year,
code,
gdp_per_capita,
count(*)
FILTER (WHERE gdp_per_capita >= 40000)
OVER (PARTITION BY year)
FROM
countries
```
**jOOQ:**
https://blog.jooq.org/2014/12/30/the-awesome-postgresql-9-4-sql2003-filter-clause-for-aggregate-functions/
**Notice:**
1.This PR only supports FILTER predicate without codegen. maropu will create another PR is related to SPARK-30027 to support codegen.
2.This PR only supports FILTER predicate without DISTINCT. I will create another PR is related to SPARK-30276 to support this.
3.This PR only supports FILTER predicate that can't reference the outer query. I created ticket SPARK-30219 to support it.
4.This PR only supports FILTER predicate that can't use IN/EXISTS predicate sub-queries. I created ticket SPARK-30220 to support it.
5.Spark SQL cannot supports a SQL with nested aggregate. I created ticket SPARK-30182 to support it.
There are some show of the PR on my production environment.
```
spark-sql> desc gja_test_partition;
key string NULL
value string NULL
other string NULL
col2 int NULL
# Partition Information
# col_name data_type comment
col2 int NULL
Time taken: 0.79 s
```
```
spark-sql> select * from gja_test_partition;
a A ao 1
b B bo 1
c C co 1
d D do 1
e E eo 2
g G go 2
h H ho 2
j J jo 2
f F fo 3
k K ko 3
l L lo 4
i I io 4
Time taken: 1.75 s
```
```
spark-sql> select count(key), sum(col2) from gja_test_partition;
12 26
Time taken: 1.848 s
```
```
spark-sql> select count(key) filter (where col2 > 1) from gja_test_partition;
8
Time taken: 2.926 s
```
```
spark-sql> select sum(col2) filter (where col2 > 2) from gja_test_partition;
14
Time taken: 2.087 s
```
```
spark-sql> select count(key) filter (where col2 > 1), sum(col2) filter (where col2 > 2) from gja_test_partition;
8 14
Time taken: 2.847 s
```
```
spark-sql> select count(key), count(key) filter (where col2 > 1), sum(col2), sum(col2) filter (where col2 > 2) from gja_test_partition;
12 8 26 14
Time taken: 1.787 s
```
```
spark-sql> desc student;
id int NULL
name string NULL
sex string NULL
class_id int NULL
Time taken: 0.206 s
```
```
spark-sql> select * from student;
1 张三 man 1
2 李四 man 1
3 王五 man 2
4 赵六 man 2
5 钱小花 woman 1
6 赵九红 woman 2
7 郭丽丽 woman 2
Time taken: 0.786 s
```
```
spark-sql> select class_id, count(id), sum(id) from student group by class_id;
1 3 8
2 4 20
Time taken: 18.783 s
```
```
spark-sql> select class_id, count(id) filter (where sex = 'man'), sum(id) filter (where sex = 'woman') from student group by class_id;
1 2 5
2 2 13
Time taken: 3.887 s
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Add new SQL feature.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Exists UT and new UT.
Closes#26656 from beliefer/support-aggregate-clause.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reprocess all PostgreSQL dialect related PRs, listing in order:
- #25158: PostgreSQL integral division support [revert]
- #25170: UT changes for the integral division support [revert]
- #25458: Accept "true", "yes", "1", "false", "no", "0", and unique prefixes as input and trim input for the boolean data type. [revert]
- #25697: Combine below 2 feature tags into "spark.sql.dialect" [revert]
- #26112: Date substraction support [keep the ANSI-compliant part]
- #26444: Rename config "spark.sql.ansi.enabled" to "spark.sql.dialect.spark.ansi.enabled" [revert]
- #26463: Cast to boolean support for PostgreSQL dialect [revert]
- #26584: Make the behavior of Postgre dialect independent of ansi mode config [keep the ANSI-compliant part]
### Why are the changes needed?
As the discussion in http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-PostgreSQL-dialect-td28417.html, we need to remove PostgreSQL dialect form code base for several reasons:
1. The current approach makes the codebase complicated and hard to maintain.
2. Fully migrating PostgreSQL workloads to Spark SQL is not our focus for now.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the config `spark.sql.dialect` will be removed.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#26763 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30125.
Lead-authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The syntax 'LIKE predicate: ESCAPE clause' is a ANSI SQL.
For example:
```
select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark\\_%'; //true
select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark/_%'; //false
select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark"_%'; //false
select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark/_%' ESCAPE '/'; //true
select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark"_%' ESCAPE '"'; //true
select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark\\%%'; //true
select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark/%%'; //false
select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark"%%'; //false
select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark/%%' ESCAPE '/'; //true
select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark"%%' ESCAPE '"'; //true
select 'abcSpark\\13sd' LIKE '%Spark\\\\_%'; //true
select 'abcSpark/13sd' LIKE '%Spark//_%'; //false
select 'abcSpark"13sd' LIKE '%Spark""_%'; //false
select 'abcSpark/13sd' LIKE '%Spark//_%' ESCAPE '/'; //true
select 'abcSpark"13sd' LIKE '%Spark""_%' ESCAPE '"'; //true
```
But Spark SQL only supports 'LIKE predicate'.
Note: If the input string or pattern string is null, then the result is null too.
There are some mainstream database support the syntax.
**PostgreSQL:**
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/functions-matching.html
**Vertica:**
https://www.vertica.com/docs/9.2.x/HTML/Content/Authoring/SQLReferenceManual/LanguageElements/Predicates/LIKE-predicate.htm?zoom_highlight=like%20escape
**MySQL:**
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/string-comparison-functions.html
**Oracle:**
https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/jjdbc/JDBC-reference-information.html#GUID-5D371A5B-D7F6-42EB-8C0D-D317F3C53708https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/sqlrf/Pattern-matching-Conditions.html#GUID-0779657B-06A8-441F-90C5-044B47862A0A
## How was this patch tested?
Exists UT and new UT.
This PR merged to my production environment and runs above sql:
```
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark\\_%';
true
Time taken: 0.119 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark/_%';
false
Time taken: 0.103 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark"_%';
false
Time taken: 0.096 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark/_%' ESCAPE '/';
true
Time taken: 0.096 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark_13sd' LIKE '%Spark"_%' ESCAPE '"';
true
Time taken: 0.092 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark\\%%';
true
Time taken: 0.109 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark/%%';
false
Time taken: 0.1 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark"%%';
false
Time taken: 0.081 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark/%%' ESCAPE '/';
true
Time taken: 0.095 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark%13sd' LIKE '%Spark"%%' ESCAPE '"';
true
Time taken: 0.113 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark\\13sd' LIKE '%Spark\\\\_%';
true
Time taken: 0.078 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark/13sd' LIKE '%Spark//_%';
false
Time taken: 0.067 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark"13sd' LIKE '%Spark""_%';
false
Time taken: 0.084 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark/13sd' LIKE '%Spark//_%' ESCAPE '/';
true
Time taken: 0.091 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select 'abcSpark"13sd' LIKE '%Spark""_%' ESCAPE '"';
true
Time taken: 0.091 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
I create a table and its schema is:
```
spark-sql> desc formatted gja_test;
key string NULL
value string NULL
other string NULL
# Detailed Table Information
Database test
Table gja_test
Owner test
Created Time Wed Apr 10 11:06:15 CST 2019
Last Access Thu Jan 01 08:00:00 CST 1970
Created By Spark 2.4.1-SNAPSHOT
Type MANAGED
Provider hive
Table Properties [transient_lastDdlTime=1563443838]
Statistics 26 bytes
Location hdfs://namenode.xxx:9000/home/test/hive/warehouse/test.db/gja_test
Serde Library org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe
InputFormat org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat
OutputFormat org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveIgnoreKeyTextOutputFormat
Storage Properties [field.delim= , serialization.format= ]
Partition Provider Catalog
Time taken: 0.642 seconds, Fetched 21 row(s)
```
Table `gja_test` exists three rows of data.
```
spark-sql> select * from gja_test;
a A ao
b B bo
"__ """__ "
Time taken: 0.665 seconds, Fetched 3 row(s)
```
At finally, I test this function:
```
spark-sql> select * from gja_test where key like value escape '"';
"__ """__ "
Time taken: 0.687 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
Closes#25001 from beliefer/ansi-sql-like.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the inconsistent behavior of build-in function SQL LEFT/RIGHT.
### Why are the changes needed?
As the comment in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26497#discussion_r345708065, Postgre dialect should not be affected by the ANSI mode config.
During reran the existing tests, only the LEFT/RIGHT build-in SQL function broke the assumption. We fix this by following https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-keywords-appendix.html: `LEFT/RIGHT reserved (can be function or type)`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the Postgre dialect will not be affected by the ANSI mode config.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#26584 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-29951.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename config "spark.sql.ansi.enabled" to "spark.sql.dialect.spark.ansi.enabled"
### Why are the changes needed?
The relation between "spark.sql.ansi.enabled" and "spark.sql.dialect" is confusing, since the "PostgreSQL" dialect should contain the features of "spark.sql.ansi.enabled".
To make things clearer, we can rename the "spark.sql.ansi.enabled" to "spark.sql.dialect.spark.ansi.enabled", thus the option "spark.sql.dialect.spark.ansi.enabled" is only for Spark dialect.
For the casting and arithmetic operations, runtime exceptions should be thrown if "spark.sql.dialect" is "spark" and "spark.sql.dialect.spark.ansi.enabled" is true or "spark.sql.dialect" is PostgresSQL.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the config name changed.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#26444 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-29807.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR supports MERGE INTO in the parser and add the corresponding logical plan. The SQL syntax likes,
```
MERGE INTO [ds_catalog.][multi_part_namespaces.]target_table [AS target_alias]
USING [ds_catalog.][multi_part_namespaces.]source_table | subquery [AS source_alias]
ON <merge_condition>
[ WHEN MATCHED [ AND <condition> ] THEN <matched_action> ]
[ WHEN MATCHED [ AND <condition> ] THEN <matched_action> ]
[ WHEN NOT MATCHED [ AND <condition> ] THEN <not_matched_action> ]
```
where
```
<matched_action> =
DELETE |
UPDATE SET * |
UPDATE SET column1 = value1 [, column2 = value2 ...]
<not_matched_action> =
INSERT * |
INSERT (column1 [, column2 ...]) VALUES (value1 [, value2 ...])
```
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a start work for introduce `MERGE INTO` support for the builtin datasource, and the design work for the `MERGE INTO` support in DSV2.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New test cases.
Closes#26167 from xianyinxin/SPARK-28893.
Authored-by: xy_xin <xianyin.xxy@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `CREATE NAMESPACE` support for V2 catalogs.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, you cannot explicitly create namespaces for v2 catalogs.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
The user can now perform the following:
```SQL
CREATE NAMESPACE mycatalog.ns
```
to create a namespace `ns` inside `mycatalog` V2 catalog.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#26166 from imback82/create_namespace.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR exposes USE CATALOG/USE SQL commands as described in this [SPIP](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jEcvomPiTc5GtB9F7d2RTVVpMY64Qy7INCA_rFEd9HQ/edit#)
It also exposes `currentCatalog` in `CatalogManager`.
Finally, it changes `SHOW NAMESPACES` and `SHOW TABLES` to use the current catalog if no catalog is specified (instead of default catalog).
### Why are the changes needed?
There is currently no mechanism to change current catalog/namespace thru SQL commands.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, you can perform the following:
```scala
// Sets the current catalog to 'testcat'
spark.sql("USE CATALOG testcat")
// Sets the current catalog to 'testcat' and current namespace to 'ns1.ns2'.
spark.sql("USE ns1.ns2 IN testcat")
// Now, the following will use 'testcat' as the current catalog and 'ns1.ns2' as the current namespace.
spark.sql("SHOW NAMESPACES")
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Closes#25771 from imback82/use_namespace.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR supports UPDATE in the parser and add the corresponding logical plan. The SQL syntax is a standard UPDATE statement:
```
UPDATE tableName tableAlias SET colName=value [, colName=value]+ WHERE predicate?
```
### Why are the changes needed?
With this change, we can start to implement UPDATE in builtin sources and think about how to design the update API in DS v2.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New test cases added.
Closes#25626 from xianyinxin/SPARK-28892.
Authored-by: xy_xin <xianyin.xxy@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, there are new configurations for compatibility with ANSI SQL:
* `spark.sql.parser.ansi.enabled`
* `spark.sql.decimalOperations.nullOnOverflow`
* `spark.sql.failOnIntegralTypeOverflow`
This PR is to add new configuration `spark.sql.ansi.enabled` and remove the 3 options above. When the configuration is true, Spark tries to conform to the ANSI SQL specification. It will be disabled by default.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make it simple and straightforward.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
The new features for ANSI compatibility will be set via one configuration `spark.sql.ansi.enabled`.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#25693 from gengliangwang/ansiEnabled.
Lead-authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement the SHOW DATABASES logical and physical plans for data source v2 tables.
### Why are the changes needed?
To support `SHOW DATABASES` SQL commands for v2 tables.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
`spark.sql("SHOW DATABASES")` will return namespaces if the default catalog is set:
```
+---------------+
| namespace|
+---------------+
| ns1|
| ns1.ns1_1|
|ns1.ns1_1.ns1_2|
+---------------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests to `DataSourceV2SQLSuite`.
Closes#25601 from imback82/show_databases.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to support ANSI SQL `Boolean-Predicate` syntax.
```sql
expression IS [NOT] TRUE
expression IS [NOT] FALSE
expression IS [NOT] UNKNOWN
```
There are some mainstream database support this syntax.
- **PostgreSQL:** https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/functions-comparison.html
- **Hive:** https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13583
- **Redshift:** https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/r_Boolean_type.html
- **Vertica:** https://www.vertica.com/docs/9.2.x/HTML/Content/Authoring/SQLReferenceManual/LanguageElements/Predicates/Boolean-predicate.htm
For example:
```sql
spark-sql> select null is true, null is not true;
false true
spark-sql> select false is true, false is not true;
false true
spark-sql> select true is true, true is not true;
true false
spark-sql> select null is false, null is not false;
false true
spark-sql> select false is false, false is not false;
true false
spark-sql> select true is false, true is not false;
false true
spark-sql> select null is unknown, null is not unknown;
true false
spark-sql> select false is unknown, false is not unknown;
false true
spark-sql> select true is unknown, true is not unknown;
false true
```
**Note**: A null input is treated as the logical value "unknown".
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the newly added test cases.
Closes#25074 from beliefer/ansi-sql-boolean-test.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `OVERLAY` function is a `ANSI` `SQL`.
For example:
```
SELECT OVERLAY('abcdef' PLACING '45' FROM 4);
SELECT OVERLAY('yabadoo' PLACING 'daba' FROM 5);
SELECT OVERLAY('yabadoo' PLACING 'daba' FROM 5 FOR 0);
SELECT OVERLAY('babosa' PLACING 'ubb' FROM 2 FOR 4);
```
The results of the above four `SQL` are:
```
abc45f
yabadaba
yabadabadoo
bubba
```
Note: If the input string is null, then the result is null too.
There are some mainstream database support the syntax.
**PostgreSQL:**
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/functions-string.html
**Vertica:** https://www.vertica.com/docs/9.2.x/HTML/Content/Authoring/SQLReferenceManual/Functions/String/OVERLAY.htm?zoom_highlight=overlay
**Oracle:**
https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/arpls/UTL_RAW.html#GUID-342E37E7-FE43-4CE1-A0E9-7DAABD000369
**DB2:**
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGMCP_5.3.0/com.ibm.cics.rexx.doc/rexx/overlay.html
There are some show of the PR on my production environment.
```
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY('abcdef' PLACING '45' FROM 4);
abc45f
Time taken: 6.385 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY('yabadoo' PLACING 'daba' FROM 5);
yabadaba
Time taken: 0.191 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY('yabadoo' PLACING 'daba' FROM 5 FOR 0);
yabadabadoo
Time taken: 0.186 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY('babosa' PLACING 'ubb' FROM 2 FOR 4);
bubba
Time taken: 0.151 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY(null PLACING '45' FROM 4);
NULL
Time taken: 0.22 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY(null PLACING 'daba' FROM 5);
NULL
Time taken: 0.157 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY(null PLACING 'daba' FROM 5 FOR 0);
NULL
Time taken: 0.254 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT OVERLAY(null PLACING 'ubb' FROM 2 FOR 4);
NULL
Time taken: 0.159 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Exists UT and new UT.
Closes#24918 from beliefer/ansi-sql-overlay.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-28093](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28093) fixed `TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM('str', 'trimStr')` returns an incorrect value, but that fix introduced a new bug, `TRIM(type trimStr FROM str)` returns an incorrect value. This pr fix this issue.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests:
Before this PR:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT trim('yxTomxx', 'xyz'), trim(BOTH 'xyz' FROM 'yxTomxx');
Tom z
spark-sql> SELECT trim('xxxbarxxx', 'x'), trim(BOTH 'x' FROM 'xxxbarxxx');
bar
spark-sql> SELECT ltrim('zzzytest', 'xyz'), trim(LEADING 'xyz' FROM 'zzzytest');
test xyz
spark-sql> SELECT ltrim('zzzytestxyz', 'xyz'), trim(LEADING 'xyz' FROM 'zzzytestxyz');
testxyz
spark-sql> SELECT ltrim('xyxXxyLAST WORD', 'xy'), trim(LEADING 'xy' FROM 'xyxXxyLAST WORD');
XxyLAST WORD
spark-sql> SELECT rtrim('testxxzx', 'xyz'), trim(TRAILING 'xyz' FROM 'testxxzx');
test xy
spark-sql> SELECT rtrim('xyztestxxzx', 'xyz'), trim(TRAILING 'xyz' FROM 'xyztestxxzx');
xyztest
spark-sql> SELECT rtrim('TURNERyxXxy', 'xy'), trim(TRAILING 'xy' FROM 'TURNERyxXxy');
TURNERyxX
```
After this PR:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT trim('yxTomxx', 'xyz'), trim(BOTH 'xyz' FROM 'yxTomxx');
Tom Tom
spark-sql> SELECT trim('xxxbarxxx', 'x'), trim(BOTH 'x' FROM 'xxxbarxxx');
bar bar
spark-sql> SELECT ltrim('zzzytest', 'xyz'), trim(LEADING 'xyz' FROM 'zzzytest');
test test
spark-sql> SELECT ltrim('zzzytestxyz', 'xyz'), trim(LEADING 'xyz' FROM 'zzzytestxyz');
testxyz testxyz
spark-sql> SELECT ltrim('xyxXxyLAST WORD', 'xy'), trim(LEADING 'xy' FROM 'xyxXxyLAST WORD');
XxyLAST WORD XxyLAST WORD
spark-sql> SELECT rtrim('testxxzx', 'xyz'), trim(TRAILING 'xyz' FROM 'testxxzx');
test test
spark-sql> SELECT rtrim('xyztestxxzx', 'xyz'), trim(TRAILING 'xyz' FROM 'xyztestxxzx');
xyztest xyztest
spark-sql> SELECT rtrim('TURNERyxXxy', 'xy'), trim(TRAILING 'xy' FROM 'TURNERyxXxy');
TURNERyxX TURNERyxX
```
And PostgreSQL:
```sql
postgres=# SELECT trim('yxTomxx', 'xyz'), trim(BOTH 'xyz' FROM 'yxTomxx');
btrim | btrim
-------+-------
Tom | Tom
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT trim('xxxbarxxx', 'x'), trim(BOTH 'x' FROM 'xxxbarxxx');
btrim | btrim
-------+-------
bar | bar
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT ltrim('zzzytest', 'xyz'), trim(LEADING 'xyz' FROM 'zzzytest');
ltrim | ltrim
-------+-------
test | test
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT ltrim('zzzytestxyz', 'xyz'), trim(LEADING 'xyz' FROM 'zzzytestxyz');
ltrim | ltrim
---------+---------
testxyz | testxyz
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT ltrim('xyxXxyLAST WORD', 'xy'), trim(LEADING 'xy' FROM 'xyxXxyLAST WORD');
ltrim | ltrim
--------------+--------------
XxyLAST WORD | XxyLAST WORD
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT rtrim('testxxzx', 'xyz'), trim(TRAILING 'xyz' FROM 'testxxzx');
rtrim | rtrim
-------+-------
test | test
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT rtrim('xyztestxxzx', 'xyz'), trim(TRAILING 'xyz' FROM 'xyztestxxzx');
rtrim | rtrim
---------+---------
xyztest | xyztest
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT rtrim('TURNERyxXxy', 'xy'), trim(TRAILING 'xy' FROM 'TURNERyxXxy');
rtrim | rtrim
-----------+-----------
TURNERyxX | TURNERyxX
(1 row)
```
Closes#24911 from wangyum/SPARK-28109.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add AL2 license to metadata of all .md files.
This seemed to be the tidiest way as it will get ignored by .md renderers and other tools. Attempts to write them as markdown comments revealed that there is no such standard thing.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc build
Closes#24243 from srowen/SPARK-26918.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is a follow-up of #24093 and includes fixes below;
- Lists up all the keywords of Spark only (that is, drops non-keywords there); I listed up all the keywords of ANSI SQL-2011 in the previous commit (SPARK-26215).
- Sorts the keywords in `SqlBase.g4` in a alphabetical order
## How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#24125 from maropu/SPARK-27161-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make it more clear about how Spark categories keywords regarding to the config `spark.sql.parser.ansi.enabled`
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#24093 from cloud-fan/parser.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2019-03-18 15:19:52 +09:00
Renamed from docs/sql-reserved-and-non-reserved-keywords.md (Browse further)
