### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix test failures with `pandas < 1.2`.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are some test failures with `pandas < 1.2`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Fixed tests.
Closes#33398 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36167/test.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support comparison between a Categorical and a scalar.
There are 3 main changes:
- Modify `==` and `!=` from comparing **codes** of the Categorical to the scalar to comparing **actual values** of the Categorical to the scalar.
- Support `<`, `<=`, `>`, `>=` between a Categorical and a scalar.
- TypeError message fix.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas supports comparison between a Categorical and a scalar, we should follow pandas' behaviors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
>>> pser = pd.Series(pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3], categories=[3, 2, 1], ordered=True))
>>> psser = ps.from_pandas(pser)
>>> psser == 2
0 True
1 False
2 False
dtype: bool
>>> psser <= 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError: <= can not be applied to categoricals.
```
After:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
>>> pser = pd.Series(pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3], categories=[3, 2, 1], ordered=True))
>>> psser = ps.from_pandas(pser)
>>> psser == 2
0 False
1 True
2 False
dtype: bool
>>> psser <= 1
0 True
1 True
2 True
dtype: bool
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33373 from xinrong-databricks/categorical_eq.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `DataFrame.to_csv` has `mode` arguments both in pandas and pandas API on Spark.
However, pandas allows the string "w", "w+", "a", "a+" where as pandas-on-Spark allows "append", "overwrite", "ignore", "error" or "errorifexists".
We should map them while `mode` can still accept the existing parameters("append", "overwrite", "ignore", "error" or "errorifexists") as well.
### Why are the changes needed?
APIs in pandas-on-Spark should follows the behavior of pandas for preventing the existing pandas code break.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`DataFrame.to_csv` now can accept "w", "w+", "a", "a+" as well, same as pandas.
### How was this patch tested?
Add the unit test and manually write the file with the new acceptable strings.
Closes#33414 from itholic/SPARK-35806.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revisit and manage `InternalField` in more places.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are other places we can manage `InternalField`, and we can keep extension dtypes or `CategoricalDtype`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33377 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36167/internal_field.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use Python 3.9 in documentation and linter at GitHub Actions. This PR also contains the fixes for mypy check (introduced by Python 3.9 upgrade)
```
python/pyspark/sql/pandas/_typing/protocols/frame.pyi:64: error: Name "np.ndarray" is not defined
python/pyspark/sql/pandas/_typing/protocols/frame.pyi:91: error: Name "np.recarray" is not defined
python/pyspark/sql/pandas/_typing/protocols/frame.pyi:165: error: Name "np.ndarray" is not defined
python/pyspark/pandas/categorical.py:82: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "categories"
python/pyspark/pandas/categorical.py:109: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "ordered"
python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.pyi:184: error: Return type "ndarray[Any, Any]" of "toArray" incompatible with return type "NoReturn" in supertype "Matrix"
python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.pyi:217: error: Return type "ndarray[Any, Any]" of "toArray" incompatible with return type "NoReturn" in supertype "Matrix"
python/pyspark/pandas/typedef/typehints.py:163: error: Module has no attribute "bool"; maybe "bool_" or "bool8"?
python/pyspark/pandas/typedef/typehints.py:174: error: Module has no attribute "float"; maybe "float_", "cfloat", or "float96"?
python/pyspark/pandas/typedef/typehints.py:180: error: Module has no attribute "int"; maybe "uint", "rint", or "intp"?
python/pyspark/pandas/ml.py:81: error: Value of type variable "_DTypeScalar_co" of "dtype" cannot be "object"
python/pyspark/pandas/indexing.py:1649: error: Module has no attribute "int"; maybe "uint", "rint", or "intp"?
python/pyspark/pandas/indexing.py:1656: error: Module has no attribute "int"; maybe "uint", "rint", or "intp"?
python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:4969: error: Function "numpy.array" is not valid as a type
python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:4969: note: Perhaps you need "Callable[...]" or a callback protocol?
python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:4970: error: Function "numpy.array" is not valid as a type
python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:4970: note: Perhaps you need "Callable[...]" or a callback protocol?
python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:7402: error: "List[Any]" has no attribute "tolist"
python/pyspark/pandas/series.py:1030: error: Module has no attribute "_NoValue"
python/pyspark/pandas/series.py:1031: error: Module has no attribute "_NoValue"
python/pyspark/pandas/indexes/category.py:159: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "categories"
python/pyspark/pandas/indexes/category.py:180: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "ordered"
python/pyspark/pandas/namespace.py:2036: error: Argument 1 to "column_name" has incompatible type "float"; expected "str"
python/pyspark/pandas/mlflow.py:59: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "Type[floating[Any]]", variable has type "str")
python/pyspark/pandas/data_type_ops/categorical_ops.py:43: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "categories"
python/pyspark/pandas/data_type_ops/categorical_ops.py:43: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "ordered"
python/pyspark/pandas/data_type_ops/categorical_ops.py:56: error: Item "dtype[Any]" of "Union[dtype[Any], Any]" has no attribute "categories"
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_typedef.py:70: error: Name "np.float" is not defined
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_typedef.py:77: error: Name "np.float" is not defined
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_typedef.py:85: error: Name "np.float" is not defined
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_typedef.py💯 error: Name "np.float" is not defined
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_typedef.py:108: error: Name "np.float" is not defined
python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.pyi:152: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "ndarray[Any, Any]", base class "KMeansModel" defined the type as "List[ndarray[Any, Any]]")
python/pyspark/mllib/classification.pyi:93: error: Signature of "predict" incompatible with supertype "LinearClassificationModel"
Found 32 errors in 15 files (checked 315 source files)
1
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Python 3.6 is deprecated at SPARK-35938
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. Maybe static analysis, etc. by some type hints but they are really non-breaking..
### How was this patch tested?
I manually checked by GitHub Actions build in forked repository.
Closes#33356 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36146.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement non-equality comparison operators between two Categoricals.
Non-goal: supporting Scalar input will be a follow-up task.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas supports non-equality comparisons between two Categoricals. We should follow that.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. No `NotImplementedError` for `<`, `<=`, `>`, `>=` operators between two Categoricals. An example is shown as below:
From:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, 2, 3]).astype(CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True))
>>> other_psser = ps.Series([2, 1, 3]).astype(CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True))
>>> with ps.option_context("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True):
... psser <= other_psser
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError: <= can not be applied to categoricals.
```
To:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, 2, 3]).astype(CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True))
>>> other_psser = ps.Series([2, 1, 3]).astype(CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True))
>>> with ps.option_context("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True):
... psser <= other_psser
...
0 False
1 True
2 True
dtype: bool
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33331 from xinrong-databricks/categorical_compare.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Properly set `InternalField` for `DataTypeOps.invert`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The spark data type and nullability must be the same as the original when `DataTypeOps.invert`.
We should manage `InternalField` for this case.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33306 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36103/invert.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement unary operator `invert` of integral ps.Series/Index.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, unary operator `invert` of integral ps.Series/Index is not supported. We ought to implement that following pandas' behaviors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
>>> ~psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError: Unary ~ can not be applied to integrals.
```
After:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
>>> ~psser
0 -2
1 -3
2 -4
dtype: int64
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33285 from xinrong-databricks/numeric_invert.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Properly set `InternalField` more in `DataTypeOps`.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are more places in `DataTypeOps` where we can manage `InternalField`.
We should manage `InternalField` for these cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33275 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36064/fields.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust `test_astype`, `test_neg` for old pandas versions.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are issues in old pandas versions that fail tests in pandas API on Spark. We ought to adjust `test_astype` and `test_neg` for old pandas versions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests. Please refer to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33272 for test results with pandas 1.0.1.
Closes#33250 from xinrong-databricks/SPARK-36035.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Merge test_decimal_ops into test_num_ops
- merge test_isnull() into test_num_ops.test_isnull()
- remove test_datatype_ops(), which already covered in 11fcbc73cb/python/pyspark/pandas/tests/data_type_ops/test_base.py (L58-L59)
### Why are the changes needed?
Tests for data-type-based operations of decimal Series are in two places:
- python/pyspark/pandas/tests/data_type_ops/test_decimal_ops.py
- python/pyspark/pandas/tests/data_type_ops/test_num_ops.py
We'd better merge test_decimal_ops into test_num_ops.
See also [SPARK-36002](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36002) .
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
unittests passed
Closes#33206 from Yikun/SPARK-36002.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For tests with operations on different Series, sort index of results before comparing them with pandas.
### Why are the changes needed?
We have many tests with operations on different Series in `spark/python/pyspark/pandas/tests/data_type_ops/` that assume the result's index to be sorted and then compare to the pandas' behavior.
The assumption on the result's index ordering is wrong since Spark DataFrame join is used internally and the order is not preserved if the data being in different partitions.
So we should assume the result to be disordered and sort the index of such results before comparing them with pandas.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33274 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_testdiffframe.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed to standardize TypeError messages for unsupported basic operations by:
- Capitalize the first letter
- Leverage TypeError messages defined in `pyspark/pandas/data_type_ops/base.py`
- Take advantage of the utility `is_valid_operand_for_numeric_arithmetic` to save duplicated TypeError messages
Related unit tests should be adjusted as well.
### Why are the changes needed?
Inconsistent TypeError messages are shown for unsupported data-type-based basic operations.
Take addition's TypeError messages for example:
- addition can not be applied to given types.
- string addition can only be applied to string series or literals.
Standardizing TypeError messages would improve user experience and reduce maintenance costs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No user-facing behavior change. Only TypeError messages are modified.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33237 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_err.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make unary and comparison operators data-type-based. Refactored operators include:
- Unary operators: `__neg__`, `__abs__`, `__invert__`,
- Comparison operators: `>`, `>=`, `<`, `<=`, `==`, `!=`
Non-goal: Tasks below are inspired during the development of this PR.
[[SPARK-35997] Implement comparison operators for CategoricalDtype in pandas API on Spark](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35997)
[[SPARK-36000] Support creating a ps.Series/Index with `Decimal('NaN')` with Arrow disabled](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36000)
[[SPARK-36001] Assume result's index to be disordered in tests with operations on different Series](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36001)
[[SPARK-36002] Consolidate tests for data-type-based operations of decimal Series](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36002)
[[SPARK-36003] Implement unary operator `invert` of numeric ps.Series/Index](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36003)
### Why are the changes needed?
We have been refactoring basic operators to be data-type-based for readability, flexibility, and extensibility.
Unary and comparison operators are still not data-type-based yet. We should fill the gaps.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
- Better error messages. For example,
Before:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b"2", b"3", b"4"])
>>> -psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(- `0`)' due to data type mismatch: ...
```
After:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b"2", b"3", b"4"])
>>> -psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Unary - can not be applied to binaries.
>>>
```
- Support unary `-` of `bool` Series. For example,
Before:
```py
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, False, True])
>>> -psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(- `0`)' due to data type mismatch: ...
```
After:
```py
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, False, True])
>>> -psser
0 False
1 True
2 False
dtype: bool
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33162 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_refactor.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should use `check_exact=False` because the value check in `StatsTest.test_cov_corr_meta` is too strict.
### Why are the changes needed?
In some environment, the precision could be different in pandas' `DataFrame.corr` function and the test `StatsTest.test_cov_corr_meta` fails.
```
AssertionError: DataFrame.iloc[:, 0] (column name="a") are different
DataFrame.iloc[:, 0] (column name="a") values are different (14.28571 %)
[index]: [a, b, c, d, e, f, g]
[left]: [1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0]
[right]: [1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 4.807406715958909e-17]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Modified tests should still pass.
Closes#33179 from ueshin/issuse/SPARK-35981/corr.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve unit tests for data-type-based basic operations by:
- removing redundant test cases
- adding `astype` test for ExtensionDtypes
### Why are the changes needed?
Some test cases for basic operations are duplicated after introducing data-type-based basic operations. The PR is proposed to remove redundant test cases.
`astype` is not tested for ExtensionDtypes, which will be adjusted in this PR as well.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33095 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_test.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add path level discover for python unittests.
### Why are the changes needed?
Now we need to specify the python test cases by manually when we add a new testcase. Sometime, we forgot to add the testcase to module list, the testcase would not be executed.
Such as:
- pyspark-core pyspark.tests.test_pin_thread
Thus we need some auto-discover way to find all testcase rather than specified every case by manually.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Add below code in end of `dev/sparktestsupport/modules.py`
```python
for m in sorted(all_modules):
for g in sorted(m.python_test_goals):
print(m.name, g)
```
Compare the result before and after:
https://www.diffchecker.com/iO3FvhKLCloses#32867 from Yikun/SPARK_DISCOVER_TEST.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed to support creating a Column of numpy literal value in pandas-on-Spark. It consists of three changes mainly:
- Enable the `lit` function defined in `pyspark.pandas.spark.functions` to support numpy literals input.
```py
>>> from pyspark.pandas.spark import functions as SF
>>> SF.lit(np.int64(1))
Column<'CAST(1 AS BIGINT)'>
>>> SF.lit(np.int32(1))
Column<'CAST(1 AS INT)'>
>>> SF.lit(np.int8(1))
Column<'CAST(1 AS TINYINT)'>
>>> SF.lit(np.byte(1))
Column<'CAST(1 AS TINYINT)'>
>>> SF.lit(np.float32(1))
Column<'CAST(1.0 AS FLOAT)'>
```
- Substitute `F.lit` by `SF.lit`, that is, use `lit` function defined in `pyspark.pandas.spark.functions` rather than `lit` function defined in `pyspark.sql.functions` to allow creating columns out of numpy literals.
- Enable numpy literals input in `isin` method
Non-goal:
- Some pandas-on-Spark APIs use PySpark column-related APIs internally, and these column-related APIs don't support numpy literals, thus numpy literals are disallowed as input (e.g. `to_replace` parameter in `replace` API). This PR doesn't aim to adjust all of them. This PR adjusts `isin` only, because the PR is inspired by that (as https://github.com/databricks/koalas/issues/2161).
- To complete mappings between all kinds of numpy literals and Spark data types should be a followup task.
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark (`lit` function defined in `pyspark.sql.functions`) doesn't support creating a Column out of numpy literal value.
So `lit` function defined in `pyspark.pandas.spark.functions` is adjusted in order to support that in pandas-on-Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before:
```py
>>> a = ps.DataFrame({'source': [1,2,3,4,5]})
>>> a.source.isin([np.int64(1), np.int64(2)])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AttributeError: 'numpy.int64' object has no attribute '_get_object_id'
```
After:
```py
>>> a = ps.DataFrame({'source': [1,2,3,4,5]})
>>> a.source.isin([np.int64(1), np.int64(2)])
0 True
1 True
2 False
3 False
4 False
Name: source, dtype: bool
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32955 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_literal.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Throw ValueError if version and timestamp are used together in to_delta
### Why are the changes needed?
read_delta has arguments named `version` and `timestamp`, but they cannot be used together.
We should raise the proper error message when they are used together.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
UT
Closes#33023 from Yikun/SPARK-35812.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Properly set `InternalField` for `DataTypeOps.isnull`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The result of `DataTypeOps.isnull` must always be non-nullable boolean.
We should manage `InternalField` for this case.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some more tests.
Closes#33005 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35847/isnull_field.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We propose to
- introduce the Ops class for ExtensionDtypes: `IntegralExtensionOps`, `FractionalExtensionOps`, `StringExtensionOps`
- make the "conversion to pandas" data-type-based for ExtensionDtypes
Non-goal: same arithmetic operation of ExtensionDtypes have different result dtypes between pandas and pandas API on Spark. That should be adjusted in a separated PR if needed.
### Why are the changes needed?
The conversion to pandas includes logic for checking ExtensionDtypes data types and behaving accordingly.
That makes code hard to change or maintain.
Since we have DataTypeOps defined, we are able to dispatch the specific conversion logic to the `ExtensionOps` classes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32910 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_pd_ext.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds DataTypeOps test to check the ops is loaded as expected.
### Why are the changes needed?
When complete https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32821, I found there are no test for DataTypeOps. There were many logic when DataTypeOps loaded, it's better to add the test to make sure interface stable.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test only
### How was this patch tested?
test passed.
Closes#32859 from Yikun/SPARK-XXXXX1.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Introduce a DecimalOps for DecimalType
- Make `isnull` method data-type-based
### Why are the changes needed?
Now DecimalType, DoubleType, and FloatType data share the FractionalOps class, but DecimalType behaves differently from FloatType and DoubleType (as https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/pyspark/pandas/base.py#L987-L990), so we propose to introduce DecimalOps. The behavior difference here is caused by DecimalType could not have NaN.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35342
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- New added DecimalOpsTest passed
- Existing NumOpsTest passed
Closes#32821 from Yikun/SPARK-35342.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the wrong behavior of `Index.difference` in pandas APIs on Spark, based on the comment https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/1325#discussion_r647889901 and https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/1325#discussion_r647890007
- it couldn't handle the case properly when `self` is `Index` or `MultiIndex` and `other` is `MultiIndex` or `Index`.
```python
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> idx1 = ps.Index([1, 2, 3])
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> midx1.difference(idx1)
pyspark.pandas.exceptions.PandasNotImplementedError: The method `pd.Index.__iter__()` is not implemented. If you want to collect your data as an NumPy array, use 'to_numpy()' instead.
```
- it's collecting the all data into the driver side when the other is list-like objects, especially when the `other` is distributed object such as Series which is very dangerous.
And added the related test cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
To correct the incompatible behavior with pandas, and to prevent the case which potentially cause the OOM easily.
```python
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> idx1 = ps.Index([1, 2, 3])
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> midx1.difference(idx1)
MultiIndex([('a', 'x', 1),
('b', 'z', 2),
('k', 'z', 3)],
)
```
And now it only using the for loop when the `other` is only the case `list`, `set` or `dict`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the previous bug is fixed as described in the above code examples.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested with linter and unittest in local, and it might be passed on CI.
Closes#32853 from itholic/SPARK-35683.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make `astype` method data-type-based.
**Non-goal: Match pandas' `astype` TypeErrors.**
Currently, `astype` throws TypeError error messages only when the destination type is not recognized. However, for some destination types that don't make sense to the specific type of Series/Index, for example, `numeric Series/Index → bytes`, we don't have proper TypeError error messages.
Since the goal of the PR is refactoring mainly, the above issue might be resolved later if needed.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are many type checks in the `astype` method. Since `DataTypeOps` and its subclasses are introduced, we should refactor `astype` to make it data-type-based. In this way, code is cleaner, more maintainable, and more flexible.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32847 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_astype.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to port the fix https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/2172.
```python
ks.DataFrame({'a': [1, 2, 3], 'b':["a", "b", "c"], 'c': [4, 5, 6]}).plot(kind='hist', x='a', y='c', bins=200)
```
**Before:**
```
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'least(min(a), min(b), min(c))' due to data type mismatch: The expressions should all have the same type, got LEAST(bigint, string, bigint).;
'Aggregate [unresolvedalias(least(min(a#1L), min(b#2), min(c#3L)), Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1556/0x0000000800d9484042fb0cc1)), unresolvedalias(greatest(max(a#1L), max(b#2), max(c#3L)), Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1556/0x0000000800d9484042fb0cc1))]
+- Project [a#1L, b#2, c#3L]
+- Project [__index_level_0__#0L, a#1L, b#2, c#3L, monotonically_increasing_id() AS __natural_order__#8L]
+- LogicalRDD [__index_level_0__#0L, a#1L, b#2, c#3L], false
```
**After:**
```python
Figure({
'data': [{'hovertemplate': 'variable=a<br>value=%{text}<br>count=%{y}',
'name': 'a',
...
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To match the behaviour with panadas' and allow users to set `x` and `y` in the DataFrame with non-numeric columns.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No to end users since the changes is not released yet. Yes to dev as described before.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, added a test and tested in notebooks:
Closes#32884 from HyukjinKwon/fix-hist-plot.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust pandas-on-spark test_groupby_multiindex_columns test in order to pass with different pandas versions.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas had introduced bugs as below:
- For pandas 1.1.3 and 1.1.4
Type error: only integer scalar arrays can be converted to a scalar index
- For pandas < 1.0.4
Type error: Can only tuple-index with a MultiIndex
We ought to adjust `test_groupby_multiindex_columns` tests by comparing with a predefined return value, rather than comparing with the pandas return value in the pandas versions above.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32851 from xinrong-databricks/SPARK-35705.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Introduce BooleanExtensionOps in order to make boolean operators `and` and `or` data-type-based.
- Improve error messages for operators `and` and `or`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Boolean operators __and__, __or__, __rand__, and __ror__ should be data-type-based
BooleanExtensionDtypes processes these boolean operators differently from bool, so BooleanExtensionOps is introduced.
These boolean operators themselves are also bitwise operators, which should be able to apply to other data types classes later. However, this is not the goal of this PR.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Error messages for operators `and` and `or` are improved.
Before:
```
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, "x", "y"], dtype="category")
>>> psser | True
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(`0` OR true)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(`0` OR true)' (tinyint and boolean).;
'Project [unresolvedalias(CASE WHEN (isnull(0#9) OR isnull((0#9 OR true))) THEN false ELSE (0#9 OR true) END, Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1442/17254916406fb8afba))]
+- Project [__index_level_0__#8L, 0#9, monotonically_increasing_id() AS __natural_order__#12L]
+- LogicalRDD [__index_level_0__#8L, 0#9], false
```
After:
```
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, "x", "y"], dtype="category")
>>> psser | True
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Bitwise or can not be applied to categoricals.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32698 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_extension.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make the conversion from/to pandas (for non-ExtensionDtype) data-type-based.
NOTE: Ops class per ExtensionDtype and its data-type-based from/to pandas will be implemented in a separate PR as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35614.
### Why are the changes needed?
The conversion from/to pandas includes logic for checking data types and behaving accordingly.
That makes code hard to change or maintain.
Since we have introduced the Ops class per non-ExtensionDtype data type, we ought to make the conversion from/to pandas data-type-based for non-ExtensionDtypes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32592 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_pd_conversion.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes applying `black` to pandas API on Spark codes, for improving static analysis.
By executing the `./dev/reformat-python` in the spark home directory, all the code of the pandas API on Spark is fixed according to the static analysis rules.
### Why are the changes needed?
This can be reduces the cost of static analysis during development.
It has been used continuously for about a year in the Koalas project and its convenience has been proven.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually reformat the pandas API on Spark codes by running the `./dev/reformat-python`, and checked the `./dev/lint-python` is passed.
Closes#32779 from itholic/SPARK-35499.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support arithmetic operations against bool IndexOpsMixin.
### Why are the changes needed?
Existing binary operations of bool IndexOpsMixin in Koalas do not match pandas’ behaviors.
pandas take True as 1, False as 0 when dealing with numeric values, numeric collections, and numeric Series/Index; whereas Koalas raises an AnalysisException no matter what the binary operation is.
We aim to match pandas' behaviors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, True, False])
>>> psser + 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> 1 + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> psser + ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: addition can not be applied to given types.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, True, False])
>>> psser + 1
0 2
1 2
2 1
dtype: int64
>>> 1 + psser
0 2
1 2
2 1
dtype: int64
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> psser + ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
0 2
1 3
2 3
dtype: int64
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) + psser
0 2
1 3
2 3
dtype: int64
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32611 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith_bool.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes renaming the existing "Koalas Accessor" to "Pandas API on Spark Accessor".
### Why are the changes needed?
Because we don't use name "Koalas" anymore, rather use "Pandas API on Spark".
So, the related code bases are all need to be changed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the usage of pandas API on Spark accessor is changed from `df.koalas.[...]`. to `df.pandas_on_spark.[...]`.
**Note:** `df.koalas.[...]` is still available but with deprecated warnings.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local and checked one by one.
Closes#32674 from itholic/SPARK-35453.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix and reenable `test_stats_on_non_numeric_columns_should_be_discarded_if_numeric_only_is_true` that was disabled when we upgrade Python 3.9 in CI at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32657.
Seems like this is because of the latest NumPy's behaviour change, see also `https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/16273#discussion_r641264085`.
pandas inherits this behaviour but it doesn't make sense when `numeric_only` is set to `True` in pandas. I will track and follow the status of the issue between pandas and NumPy.
For the time being, I propose to exclude boolean case alone in percentile/quartile test case
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep the test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
I roughly locally tested. But it should pass in CI.
Closes#32690 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35510.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Re-enable some pandas-on-Spark test cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas version in GitHub Actions is upgraded now so we can re-enable some pandas-on-Spark test cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32682 from xinrong-databricks/enable_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduce a util function `spark_column_equals` to check the underlying expressions of columns are the same or not.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pandas on Spark, there are some places checking the underlying expressions of columns are the same or not, but it's done one-by-one.
We should introduce a util function for it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#32680 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35537/spark_column_equals.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
BinaryType, which represents byte sequence values in Spark, doesn't support data-type-based operations yet. We are going to introduce BinaryOps for it.
### Why are the changes needed?
The data-type-based-operations class should be set for each individual data type, including BinaryType.
In addition, BinaryType has its special way of addition, which means concatenation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b'1', b'2', b'3'])
>>> psser + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> psser + b'1'
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b'1', b'2', b'3'])
>>> psser + psser
0 [49, 49]
1 [50, 50]
2 [51, 51]
dtype: object
>>> psser + b'1'
0 [49, 49]
1 [50, 49]
2 [51, 49]
dtype: object
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32665 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_binary.
Lead-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed to introduce ArrayOps, MapOps and StructOps to handle data-type-based operations for StructType, ArrayType, and MapType separately.
### Why are the changes needed?
StructType, ArrayType, and MapType are not accepted by DataTypeOps now.
We should handle these complex types. Among them:
- ArrayType supports concatenation: for example, ps.Series([[1,2,3]]) + ps.Series([[4,5,6]]) should work the same as pd.Series([[1,2,3]]) + pd.Series([[4,5,6]]), as concatenation.
- StructOps will be helpful to make to/from pandas conversion data-type-based.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[0.4, 0.5]])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[4, 5]])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([['x']])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[0.4, 0.5]])
0 [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 0.4, 0.5]
dtype: object
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[4, 5]])
0 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
dtype: object
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([['x']])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Concatenation can only be applied to arrays of the same type
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32626 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_complex.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables GitHub Actions to test PySpark with Python 3.9.
### Why are the changes needed?
To verify the support of Python 3.9.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover.
Closes#32657 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35506.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes APIs which have been deprecated in Koalas.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are some APIs that have been deprecated in Koalas. We shouldn't have those in pandas APIs on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the APIs deprecated in Koalas will be no longer available.
### How was this patch tested?
Modified some tests which use the deprecated APIs, and the other existing tests should pass.
Closes#32656 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35505/remove_deprecated.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables plot tests with plotly
```bash
./python/run-tests --python-executables=python3 --modules=pyspark-pandas
```
**Before**:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/.../miniconda3/envs/python3.8/lib/python3.8/runpy.py", line 194, in _run_module_as_main
return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
File "/.../miniconda3/envs/python3.8/lib/python3.8/runpy.py", line 87, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "/.../pyspark/pandas/tests/plot/test_frame_plot_plotly.py", line 42, in <module>
plotly_requirement_message + " Or pandas<1.0; pandas<1.0 does not support latest plotly "
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'str'
```
**After**:
```
...
Starting test(python3): pyspark.pandas.tests.plot.test_series_plot_plotly
...
Finished test(python3): pyspark.pandas.tests.plot.test_series_plot_plotly (23s)
...
Tests passed in 1296 seconds
```
### Why are the changes needed?
For test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the tests.
Closes#32649 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35497.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are still naming related to Koalas in test and function name. This PR addressed them to fit pandas-on-spark.
- kdf -> psdf
- kser -> psser
- kidx -> psidx
- kmidx -> psmidx
- to_koalas() -> to_pandas_on_spark()
### Why are the changes needed?
This is because the name Koalas is no longer used in PySpark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`to_koalas()` function is renamed to `to_pandas_on_spark()`
### How was this patch tested?
Tested in local manually.
After changing the related naming, I checked them one by one.
Closes#32516 from itholic/SPARK-35364.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed for **pandas APIs on Spark**, in order to separate arithmetic operations shown as below into data-type-based structures.
`__add__, __sub__, __mul__, __truediv__, __floordiv__, __pow__, __mod__,
__radd__, __rsub__, __rmul__, __rtruediv__, __rfloordiv__, __rpow__,__rmod__`
DataTypeOps and subclasses are introduced.
The existing behaviors of each arithmetic operation should be preserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the same arithmetic operation of all data types is defined in one function, so it’s difficult to extend the behavior change based on the data types.
Introducing DataTypeOps would be the foundation for [pandas APIs on Spark: Separate basic operations into data type based structures.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12MS6xK0hETYmrcl5b9pX5lgV4FmGVfpmcSKq--_oQlc/edit?usp=sharing).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests are introduced under pyspark.pandas.tests.data_type_ops. One test file per DataTypeOps class.
Closes#32596 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith_fix.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed for **pandas APIs on Spark**, in order to separate arithmetic operations shown as below into data-type-based structures.
`__add__, __sub__, __mul__, __truediv__, __floordiv__, __pow__, __mod__,
__radd__, __rsub__, __rmul__, __rtruediv__, __rfloordiv__, __rpow__,__rmod__`
DataTypeOps and subclasses are introduced.
The existing behaviors of each arithmetic operation should be preserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the same arithmetic operation of all data types is defined in one function, so it’s difficult to extend the behavior change based on the data types.
Introducing DataTypeOps would be the foundation for [pandas APIs on Spark: Separate basic operations into data type based structures.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12MS6xK0hETYmrcl5b9pX5lgV4FmGVfpmcSKq--_oQlc/edit?usp=sharing).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests are introduced under pyspark.pandas.tests.data_type_ops. One test file per DataTypeOps class.
Closes#32469 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects some exception type when the function input params are failed to validate due to TypeError.
In order to convenient to review, there are 3 commits in this PR:
- Standardize input validation error type on sql
- Standardize input validation error type on ml
- Standardize input validation error type on pandas
### Why are the changes needed?
As suggestion from Python exception doc [1]: "Raised when an operation or function is applied to an object of inappropriate type.", but there are many Value error are raised in some pyspark code, this patch fix them.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#TypeError
Note that: this patch only addresses the exsiting some wrong raise type for input validation, the input validation decorator/framework which mentioned in [SPARK-35176](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35176), would be submited in a speparated patch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, code can raise the right TypeError instead of ValueError.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test case and UT
Closes#32368 from Yikun/SPARK-35176.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes PySpark version dependent codes from pyspark.pandas test codes.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are several places to check the PySpark version and switch the logic, but now those are not necessary.
We should remove them.
We will do the same thing after we finish porting tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32300 from xinrong-databricks/port.rmv_spark_version_chk_in_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Consolidate PySpark testing utils by removing `python/pyspark/pandas/testing`, and then creating a file `pandasutils` under `python/pyspark/testing` for test utilities used in `pyspark/pandas`.
### Why are the changes needed?
`python/pyspark/pandas/testing` hold test utilites for pandas-on-spark, and `python/pyspark/testing` contain test utilities for pyspark. Consolidating them makes code cleaner and easier to maintain.
Updated import statements are as shown below:
- from pyspark.testing.sqlutils import SQLTestUtils
- from pyspark.testing.pandasutils import PandasOnSparkTestCase, TestUtils
(PandasOnSparkTestCase is the original ReusedSQLTestCase in `python/pyspark/pandas/testing/utils.py`)
Minor improvements include:
- Usage of missing library's requirement_message
- `except ImportError` rather than `except`
- import pyspark.pandas alias as `ps` rather than `pp`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests under python/pyspark/pandas/tests.
Closes#32177 from xinrong-databricks/port.merge_utils.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some more changes in Koalas such as [databricks/koalas#2141](c8f803d6be), [databricks/koalas#2143](913d68868d) after the main code porting, this PR is to synchronize those changes with the `pyspark.pandas`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should port the whole Koalas codes into PySpark and synchronize them.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fixed some incompatible behavior with pandas 1.2.0 and added more to the `to_markdown` docstring.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local.
Closes#32197 from itholic/SPARK-34995-fix.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
