Aside from trivial formatting changes, use nulls instead of Options for
DiskMapIterator, and add documentation for spark.shuffle.externalSorting
and spark.shuffle.memoryFraction.
Also, set spark.shuffle.memoryFraction to 0.3, and spark.storage.memoryFraction = 0.6.
Yarn client addjar and misc fixes
Fix the addJar functionality in yarn-client mode, add support for the other options supported in yarn-standalone mode, set the application type on yarn in hadoop 2.X, add documentation, change heartbeat interval to be same code as the yarn-standalone so it doesn't take so long to get containers and exit.
Make DEBUG-level logs consummable.
Removes two things that caused issues with the debug logs:
(a) Internal polling in the DAGScheduler was polluting the logs.
(b) The Scala REPL logs were really noisy.
Removes two things that caused issues with the debug logs:
(a) Internal polling in the DAGScheduler was polluting the logs.
(b) The Scala REPL logs were really noisy.
Fix bug added when we changed AppDescription.maxCores to an Option
The Scala compiler warned about this -- we were comparing an Option against an integer now.
Set default logging to WARN for Spark streaming examples.
This programatically sets the log level to WARN by default for streaming
tests. If the user has already specified a log4j.properties file,
the user's file will take precedence over this default.
This is an alternative to the existing approach, which evenly distributes the
collective shuffle memory among all running tasks. In the new approach, each
thread requests a chunk of memory whenever its map is about to multiplicatively
grow. If there is sufficient memory in the global pool, the thread allocates it
and grows its map. Otherwise, it spills.
A danger with the previous approach is that a new task may quickly fill up its
map before old tasks finish spilling, potentially causing an OOM. This approach
prevents this scenario as it favors existing tasks over new tasks; any thread
that may step over the boundary of other threads defensively backs off and
starts spilling.
Testing through spark-perf reveals: (1) When no spills have occured, the
performance of external sorting using this memory management approach is
essentially the same as without external sorting. (2) When one or more spills
have occured, the performance of external sorting is a small multiple (3x) worse
