Spark SQL has great support for reading text files that contain JSON data. However, in many cases the JSON data is just one column amongst others. This is particularly true when reading from sources such as Kafka. This PR adds a new functions `from_json` that converts a string column into a nested `StructType` with a user specified schema.
Example usage:
```scala
val df = Seq("""{"a": 1}""").toDS()
val schema = new StructType().add("a", IntegerType)
df.select(from_json($"value", schema) as 'json) // => [json: <a: int>]
```
This PR adds support for java, scala and python. I leveraged our existing JSON parsing support by moving it into catalyst (so that we could define expressions using it). I left SQL out for now, because I'm not sure how users would specify a schema.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15274 from marmbrus/jsonParser.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Method `SQLContext.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` could be removed, we should use `SparkSession.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` instead.
This require updating PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Author: jiangxingbo <jiangxb1987@gmail.com>
Closes#14790 from jiangxb1987/parseDataType.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Doc that regexp_extract returns empty string when regex or group does not match
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test, with a few new test cases
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14525 from srowen/SPARK-16324.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
regexp_extract actually returns null when it shouldn't when a regex matches but the requested optional group did not. This makes it return an empty string, as apparently designed.
## How was this patch tested?
Additional unit test
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14504 from srowen/SPARK-16409.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements `posexplode` table generating function. Currently, master branch raises the following exception for `map` argument. It's different from Hive.
**Before**
```scala
scala> sql("select posexplode(map('a', 1, 'b', 2))").show
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: No handler for Hive UDF ... posexplode() takes an array as a parameter; line 1 pos 7
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select posexplode(map('a', 1, 'b', 2))").show
+---+---+-----+
|pos|key|value|
+---+---+-----+
| 0| a| 1|
| 1| b| 2|
+---+---+-----+
```
For `array` argument, `after` is the same with `before`.
```
scala> sql("select posexplode(array(1, 2, 3))").show
+---+---+
|pos|col|
+---+---+
| 0| 1|
| 1| 2|
| 2| 3|
+---+---+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests with newly added testcases.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13971 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16289.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`a` -> `an`
I use regex to generate potential error lines:
`grep -in ' a [aeiou]' mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/*/*scala`
and review them line by line.
## How was this patch tested?
local build
`lint-java` checking
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#13317 from zhengruifeng/a_an.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
in hive, `locate("aa", "aaa", 0)` would yield 0, `locate("aa", "aaa", 1)` would yield 1 and `locate("aa", "aaa", 2)` would yield 2, while in Spark, `locate("aa", "aaa", 0)` would yield 1, `locate("aa", "aaa", 1)` would yield 2 and `locate("aa", "aaa", 2)` would yield 0. This results from the different understanding of the third parameter in udf `locate`. It means the starting index and starts from 1, so when we use 0, the return would always be 0.
## How was this patch tested?
tested with modified `StringExpressionsSuite` and `StringFunctionsSuite`
Author: Daoyuan Wang <daoyuan.wang@intel.com>
Closes#13186 from adrian-wang/locate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace SQLContext and SparkContext with SparkSession using builder pattern in python test code.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#13242 from WeichenXu123/python_doctest_update_sparksession.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark assumes that UDF functions are deterministic. This PR adds explicit notes about that.
## How was this patch tested?
It's only about docs.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13087 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15282.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This issue aims to expose Scala `bround` function in Python/R API.
`bround` function is implemented in SPARK-14614 by extending current `round` function.
We used the following semantics from Hive.
```java
public static double bround(double input, int scale) {
if (Double.isNaN(input) || Double.isInfinite(input)) {
return input;
}
return BigDecimal.valueOf(input).setScale(scale, RoundingMode.HALF_EVEN).doubleValue();
}
```
After this PR, `pyspark` and `sparkR` also support `bround` function.
**PySpark**
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import bround
>>> sqlContext.createDataFrame([(2.5,)], ['a']).select(bround('a', 0).alias('r')).collect()
[Row(r=2.0)]
```
**SparkR**
```r
> df = createDataFrame(sqlContext, data.frame(x = c(2.5, 3.5)))
> head(collect(select(df, bround(df$x, 0))))
bround(x, 0)
1 2
2 4
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12509 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-14639.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `window` function was added to Dataset with [this PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008).
This PR adds the Python, and SQL, API for this function.
With this PR, SQL, Java, and Scala will share the same APIs as in users can use:
- `window(timeColumn, windowDuration)`
- `window(timeColumn, windowDuration, slideDuration)`
- `window(timeColumn, windowDuration, slideDuration, startTime)`
In Python, users can access all APIs above, but in addition they can do
- In Python:
`window(timeColumn, windowDuration, startTime=...)`
that is, they can provide the startTime without providing the `slideDuration`. In this case, we will generate tumbling windows.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests + manual tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#12136 from brkyvz/python-windows.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support multiple Python UDFs within single batch, also improve the performance.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import IntegerType
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("double", lambda x: x * 2, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("add", lambda x, y: x + y, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.sql("SELECT double(add(1, 2)), add(double(2), 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('double('add(1, 2)), None),unresolvedalias('add('double(2), 1), None)]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
double(add(1, 2)): int, add(double(2), 1): int
Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17,pythonUDF0#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Using the following script to benchmark 1, 2 and 3 udfs,
```
df = sqlContext.range(1, 1 << 23, 1, 4)
double = F.udf(lambda x: x * 2, LongType())
print df.select(double(df.id)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1), double(df.id + 2)).count()
```
Here is the results:
N | Before | After | speed up
---- |------------ | -------------|------
1 | 22 s | 7 s | 3.1X
2 | 38 s | 13 s | 2.9X
3 | 58 s | 16 s | 3.6X
This benchmark ran locally with 4 CPUs. For 3 UDFs, it launched 12 Python before before this patch, 4 process after this patch. After this patch, it will use less memory for multiple UDFs than before (less buffering).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12057 from davies/multi_udfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR brings the support for chained Python UDFs, for example
```sql
select udf1(udf2(a))
select udf1(udf2(a) + 3)
select udf1(udf2(a) + udf3(b))
```
Also directly chained unary Python UDFs are put in single batch of Python UDFs, others may require multiple batches.
For example,
```python
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#10 AS double(double(1))#9]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(double(1)), [pythonUDF#10]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1) + double(2))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#19 AS double((double(1) + double(2)))#16]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double((pythonUDF#17 + pythonUDF#18)), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18,pythonUDF#19]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(2), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(1), [pythonUDF#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
TODO: will support multiple unrelated Python UDFs in one batch (another PR).
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests for chained UDFs.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12014 from davies/py_udfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As we have `CreateArray` and `CreateStruct`, we should also have `CreateMap`. This PR adds the `CreateMap` expression, and the DataFrame API, and python API.
## How was this patch tested?
various new tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11879 from cloud-fan/create_map.
Minor typo: docstring for pyspark.sql.functions: hypot has extra characters
N/A
Author: Tristan Reid <treid@netflix.com>
Closes#11616 from tristanreid/master.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is for supporting SQL generation for cube, rollup and grouping sets.
For example, a query using rollup:
```SQL
SELECT count(*) as cnt, key % 5, grouping_id() FROM t1 GROUP BY key % 5 WITH ROLLUP
```
Original logical plan:
```
Aggregate [(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L,grouping__id#46],
[(count(1),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS cnt#43L,
(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L AS _c1#45L,
grouping__id#46 AS _c2#44]
+- Expand [List(key#17L, value#18, (key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L, 0),
List(key#17L, value#18, null, 1)],
[key#17L,value#18,(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L,grouping__id#46]
+- Project [key#17L,
value#18,
(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint)) AS (key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L]
+- Subquery t1
+- Relation[key#17L,value#18] ParquetRelation
```
Converted SQL:
```SQL
SELECT count( 1) AS `cnt`,
(`t1`.`key` % CAST(5 AS BIGINT)),
grouping_id() AS `_c2`
FROM `default`.`t1`
GROUP BY (`t1`.`key` % CAST(5 AS BIGINT))
GROUPING SETS (((`t1`.`key` % CAST(5 AS BIGINT))), ())
```
#### How was the this patch tested?
Added eight test cases in `LogicalPlanToSQLSuite`.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#11283 from gatorsmile/groupingSetsToSQL.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove `map`, `flatMap`, `mapPartitions` from python DataFrame, to prepare for Dataset API in the future.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11445 from cloud-fan/python-clean.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we pass a Python function to JVM side, we also need to send its context, e.g. `envVars`, `pythonIncludes`, `pythonExec`, etc. However, it's annoying to pass around so many parameters at many places. This PR abstract python function along with its context, to simplify some pyspark code and make the logic more clear.
## How was the this patch tested?
by existing unit tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11342 from cloud-fan/python-clean.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix all typos in all markdown files under `docs` module,
and fixes similar typos in other comments, too.
## How was the this patch tested?
manual tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11300 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_fix_typos.
This PR introduces several major changes:
1. Replacing `Expression.prettyString` with `Expression.sql`
The `prettyString` method is mostly an internal, developer faced facility for debugging purposes, and shouldn't be exposed to users.
1. Using SQL-like representation as column names for selected fields that are not named expression (back-ticks and double quotes should be removed)
Before, we were using `prettyString` as column names when possible, and sometimes the result column names can be weird. Here are several examples:
Expression | `prettyString` | `sql` | Note
------------------ | -------------- | ---------- | ---------------
`a && b` | `a && b` | `a AND b` |
`a.getField("f")` | `a[f]` | `a.f` | `a` is a struct
1. Adding trait `NonSQLExpression` extending from `Expression` for expressions that don't have a SQL representation (e.g. Scala UDF/UDAF and Java/Scala object expressions used for encoders)
`NonSQLExpression.sql` may return an arbitrary user facing string representation of the expression.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10757 from liancheng/spark-12799.simplify-expression-string-methods.
This pull request has the following changes:
1. Moved UserDefinedFunction into expressions package. This is more consistent with how we structure the packages for window functions and UDAFs.
2. Moved UserDefinedPythonFunction into execution.python package, so we don't have a random private class in the top level sql package.
3. Move everything in execution/python.scala into the newly created execution.python package.
Most of the diffs are just straight copy-paste.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11181 from rxin/SPARK-13296.
PySpark support ```covar_samp``` and ```covar_pop```.
cc rxin davies marmbrus
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#10876 from yanboliang/spark-12962.
Grouping() returns a column is aggregated or not, grouping_id() returns the aggregation levels.
grouping()/grouping_id() could be used with window function, but does not work in having/sort clause, will be fixed by another PR.
The GROUPING__ID/grouping_id() in Hive is wrong (according to docs), we also did it wrongly, this PR change that to match the behavior in most databases (also the docs of Hive).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10677 from davies/grouping.
This PR adds the ability to specify the ```ignoreNulls``` option to the functions dsl, e.g:
```df.select($"id", last($"value", ignoreNulls = true).over(Window.partitionBy($"id").orderBy($"other"))```
This PR is some where between a bug fix (see the JIRA) and a new feature. I am not sure if we should backport to 1.6.
cc yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10957 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13049.
address comments in #10435
This makes the API easier to use if user programmatically generate the call to hash, and they will get analysis exception if the arguments of hash is empty.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10588 from cloud-fan/hash.
Added Python test cases for the function `isnan`, `isnull`, `nanvl` and `json_tuple`.
Fixed a bug in the function `json_tuple`
rxin , could you help me review my changes? Please let me know anything is missing.
Thank you! Have a good Thanksgiving day!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#9977 from gatorsmile/json_tuple.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9830
This PR contains the following main changes.
* Removing `AggregateExpression1`.
* Removing `Aggregate` operator, which is used to evaluate `AggregateExpression1`.
* Removing planner rule used to plan `Aggregate`.
* Linking `MultipleDistinctRewriter` to analyzer.
* Renaming `AggregateExpression2` to `AggregateExpression` and `AggregateFunction2` to `AggregateFunction`.
* Updating places where we create aggregate expression. The way to create aggregate expressions is `AggregateExpression(aggregateFunction, mode, isDistinct)`.
* Changing `val`s in `DeclarativeAggregate`s that touch children of this function to `lazy val`s (when we create aggregate expression in DataFrame API, children of an aggregate function can be unresolved).
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#9556 from yhuai/removeAgg1.
For now they are thin wrappers around the corresponding Hive UDAFs.
One limitation with these in Hive 0.13.0 is they only support aggregating primitive types.
I chose snake_case here instead of camelCase because it seems to be used in the majority of the multi-word fns.
Do we also want to add these to `functions.py`?
This approach was recommended here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8592#issuecomment-154247089
marmbrus rxin
Author: Nick Buroojy <nick.buroojy@civitaslearning.com>
Closes#9526 from nburoojy/nick/udaf-alias.
(cherry picked from commit a6ee4f989d)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Add Python API for stddev/stddev_pop/stddev_samp/variance/var_pop/var_samp/skewness/kurtosis
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#9424 from davies/py_var.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9691
jkbradley rxin
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#7999 from yhuai/pythonRand and squashes the following commits:
4187e0c [Yin Huai] Regression test.
a985ef9 [Yin Huai] Use "if seed is not None" instead "if seed" because "if seed" returns false when seed is 0.
Author: zhichao.li <zhichao.li@intel.com>
Closes#7709 from zhichao-li/translate and squashes the following commits:
9418088 [zhichao.li] refine checking condition
f2ab77a [zhichao.li] clone string
9d88f2d [zhichao.li] fix indent
6aa2962 [zhichao.li] style
e575ead [zhichao.li] add python api
9d4bab0 [zhichao.li] add special case for fodable and refactor unittest
eda7ad6 [zhichao.li] update to use TernaryExpression
cdfd4be [zhichao.li] add function translate
This PR is based on #7580 , thanks to EntilZha
PR for work on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8231
Currently, I have an initial implementation for contains. Based on discussion on JIRA, it should behave same as Hive: https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/generic/GenericUDFArrayContains.java#L102-L128
Main points are:
1. If the array is empty, null, or the value is null, return false
2. If there is a type mismatch, throw error
3. If comparison is not supported, throw error
Closes#7580
Author: Pedro Rodriguez <prodriguez@trulia.com>
Author: Pedro Rodriguez <ski.rodriguez@gmail.com>
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7949 from davies/array_contains and squashes the following commits:
d3c08bc [Davies Liu] use foreach() to avoid copy
bc3d1fe [Davies Liu] fix array_contains
719e37d [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into array_contains
e352cf9 [Pedro Rodriguez] fixed diff from master
4d5b0ff [Pedro Rodriguez] added docs and another type check
ffc0591 [Pedro Rodriguez] fixed unit test
7a22deb [Pedro Rodriguez] Changed test to use strings instead of long/ints which are different between python 2 an 3
b5ffae8 [Pedro Rodriguez] fixed pyspark test
4e7dce3 [Pedro Rodriguez] added more docs
3082399 [Pedro Rodriguez] fixed unit test
46f9789 [Pedro Rodriguez] reverted change
d3ca013 [Pedro Rodriguez] Fixed type checking to match hive behavior, then added tests to insure this
8528027 [Pedro Rodriguez] added more tests
686e029 [Pedro Rodriguez] fix scala style
d262e9d [Pedro Rodriguez] reworked type checking code and added more tests
2517a58 [Pedro Rodriguez] removed unused import
28b4f71 [Pedro Rodriguez] fixed bug with type conversions and re-added tests
12f8795 [Pedro Rodriguez] fix scala style checks
e8a20a9 [Pedro Rodriguez] added python df (broken atm)
65b562c [Pedro Rodriguez] made array_contains nullable false
33b45aa [Pedro Rodriguez] reordered test
9623c64 [Pedro Rodriguez] fixed test
4b4425b [Pedro Rodriguez] changed Arrays in tests to Seqs
72cb4b1 [Pedro Rodriguez] added checkInputTypes and docs
69c46fb [Pedro Rodriguez] added tests and codegen
9e0bfc4 [Pedro Rodriguez] initial attempt at implementation
This adds Python API for those DataFrame functions that is introduced in 1.5.
There is issue with serialize byte_array in Python 3, so some of functions (for BinaryType) does not have tests.
cc rxin
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7922 from davies/python_functions and squashes the following commits:
8ad942f [Davies Liu] fix test
5fb6ec3 [Davies Liu] fix bugs
3495ed3 [Davies Liu] fix issues
ea5f7bb [Davies Liu] Add python API for DataFrame functions
This PR is based on #7208 , thanks to HuJiayin
Closes#7208
Author: HuJiayin <jiayin.hu@intel.com>
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7850 from davies/initcap and squashes the following commits:
54472e9 [Davies Liu] fix python test
17ffe51 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into initcap
ca46390 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into initcap
3a906e4 [Davies Liu] implement title case in UTF8String
8b2506a [HuJiayin] Update functions.py
2cd43e5 [HuJiayin] fix python style check
b616c0e [HuJiayin] add python api
1f5a0ef [HuJiayin] add codegen
7e0c604 [HuJiayin] Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/spark into initcap
6a0b958 [HuJiayin] add column
c79482d [HuJiayin] support soundex
7ce416b [HuJiayin] support initcap rebase code
