## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #16308.
This pr enables timezone support in CSV/JSON parsing.
We should introduce `timeZone` option for CSV/JSON datasources (the default value of the option is session local timezone).
The datasources should use the `timeZone` option to format/parse to write/read timestamp values.
Notice that while reading, if the timestampFormat has the timezone info, the timezone will not be used because we should respect the timezone in the values.
For example, if you have timestamp `"2016-01-01 00:00:00"` in `GMT`, the values written with the default timezone option, which is `"GMT"` because session local timezone is `"GMT"` here, are:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "GMT")
scala> val df = Seq(new java.sql.Timestamp(1451606400000L)).toDF("ts")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ts: timestamp]
scala> df.show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
scala> df.write.json("/path/to/gmtjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/gmtjson/part-*
{"ts":"2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z"}
```
whereas setting the option to `"PST"`, they are:
```scala
scala> df.write.option("timeZone", "PST").json("/path/to/pstjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/pstjson/part-*
{"ts":"2015-12-31T16:00:00.000-08:00"}
```
We can properly read these files even if the timezone option is wrong because the timestamp values have timezone info:
```scala
scala> val schema = new StructType().add("ts", TimestampType)
schema: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType = StructType(StructField(ts,TimestampType,true))
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).json("/path/to/gmtjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timeZone", "PST").json("/path/to/gmtjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
And even if `timezoneFormat` doesn't contain timezone info, we can properly read the values with setting correct timezone option:
```scala
scala> df.write.option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").option("timeZone", "JST").json("/path/to/jstjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/jstjson/part-*
{"ts":"2016-01-01T09:00:00"}
```
```scala
// wrong result
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").json("/path/to/jstjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 09:00:00|
+-------------------+
// correct result
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").option("timeZone", "JST").json("/path/to/jstjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
This pr also makes `JsonToStruct` and `StructToJson` `TimeZoneAwareExpression` to be able to evaluate values with timezone option.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#16750 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-18937.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add coalesce on DataFrame for down partitioning without shuffle and coalesce on Column
## How was this patch tested?
manual, unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#16739 from felixcheung/rcoalesce.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `udf` decorator syntax as proposed in [SPARK-19160](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19160).
This allows users to define UDF using simplified syntax:
```python
from pyspark.sql.decorators import udf
udf(IntegerType())
def add_one(x):
"""Adds one"""
if x is not None:
return x + 1
```
without need to define a separate function and udf.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests to ensure backward compatibility and additional unit tests covering new functionality.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16533 from zero323/SPARK-19160.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a `metadata` keyword parameter to `pyspark.sql.Column.alias()` to allow users to mix-in metadata while manipulating `DataFrame`s in `pyspark`. Without this, I believe it was necessary to pass back through `SparkSession.createDataFrame` each time a user wanted to manipulate `StructField.metadata` in `pyspark`.
This pull request also improves consistency between the Scala and Python APIs (i.e. I did not add any functionality that was not already in the Scala API).
Discussed ahead of time on JIRA with marmbrus
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests (and doc tests). Ran the pertinent tests manually.
Author: Sheamus K. Parkes <shea.parkes@milliman.com>
Closes#16094 from shea-parkes/pyspark-column-alias-metadata.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
UDF constructor checks if `func` argument is callable and if it is not, fails fast instead of waiting for an action.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16535 from zero323/SPARK-19162.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Provides correct description of the semantics of a `dict` argument passed as `to_replace`.
- Describes type requirements for collection arguments.
- Describes behavior with `to_replace: List[T]` and `value: T`
## How was this patch tested?
Manual testing, documentation build.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16792 from zero323/SPARK-19453.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add support for `slice` arguments in `Column.__getitem__`.
- Remove obsolete `__getslice__` bindings.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests, additional tests covering `[]` with `slice`.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16771 from zero323/SPARK-19429.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for data type string as a return type argument of `UserDefinedFunction`:
```python
f = udf(lambda x: x, "integer")
f.returnType
## IntegerType
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests, additional unit tests covering new feature.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16769 from zero323/SPARK-19427.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request adds two new user facing functions:
- `to_date` which accepts an expression and a format and returns a date.
- `to_timestamp` which accepts an expression and a format and returns a timestamp.
For example, Given a date in format: `2016-21-05`. (YYYY-dd-MM)
### Date Function
*Previously*
```
to_date(unix_timestamp(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM").cast("timestamp"))
```
*Current*
```
to_date(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM")
```
### Timestamp Function
*Previously*
```
unix_timestamp(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM").cast("timestamp")
```
*Current*
```
to_timestamp(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM")
```
### Tasks
- [X] Add `to_date` to Scala Functions
- [x] Add `to_date` to Python Functions
- [x] Add `to_date` to SQL Functions
- [X] Add `to_timestamp` to Scala Functions
- [x] Add `to_timestamp` to Python Functions
- [x] Add `to_timestamp` to SQL Functions
- [x] Add function to R
## How was this patch tested?
- [x] Add Functions to `DateFunctionsSuite`
- Test new `ParseToTimestamp` Expression (*not necessary*)
- Test new `ParseToDate` Expression (*not necessary*)
- [x] Add test for R
- [x] Add test for Python in test.py
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Author: anabranch <bill@databricks.com>
Closes#16138 from anabranch/SPARK-16609.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add the multi-cols support based on current private api
2, add the multi-cols support to pyspark
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Author: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#12135 from zhengruifeng/quantile4multicols.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Defer `UserDefinedFunction._judf` initialization to the first call. This prevents unintended `SparkSession` initialization. This allows users to define and import UDF without creating a context / session as a side effect.
[SPARK-19163](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19163)
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16536 from zero323/SPARK-19163.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This removes from the `__all__` list class names that are not defined (visible) in the `pyspark.sql.column`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16742 from zero323/SPARK-19403.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is weird to create Hive source tables when using InMemoryCatalog. We are unable to operate it. This PR is to block users to create Hive source tables.
### How was this patch tested?
Fixed the test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#16587 from gatorsmile/blockHiveTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PythonUDF is unevaluable, which can not be used inside a join condition, currently the optimizer will push a PythonUDF which accessing both side of join into the join condition, then the query will fail to plan.
This PR fix this issue by checking the expression is evaluable or not before pushing it into Join.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a regression test.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#16581 from davies/pyudf_join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For some datasources which are based on HadoopRDD or NewHadoopRDD, such as spark-xml, InputFileBlockHolder doesn't work with Python UDF.
The method to reproduce it is, running the following codes with `bin/pyspark --packages com.databricks:spark-xml_2.11:0.4.1`:
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf,input_file_name
from pyspark.sql.types import StringType
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
def filename(path):
return path
session = SparkSession.builder.appName('APP').getOrCreate()
session.udf.register('sameText', filename)
sameText = udf(filename, StringType())
df = session.read.format('xml').load('a.xml', rowTag='root').select('*', input_file_name().alias('file'))
df.select('file').show() # works
df.select(sameText(df['file'])).show() # returns empty content
The issue is because in `HadoopRDD` and `NewHadoopRDD` we set the file block's info in `InputFileBlockHolder` before the returned iterator begins consuming. `InputFileBlockHolder` will record this info into thread local variable. When running Python UDF in batch, we set up another thread to consume the iterator from child plan's output rdd, so we can't read the info back in another thread.
To fix this, we have to set the info in `InputFileBlockHolder` after the iterator begins consuming. So the info can be read in correct thread.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test with above example codes for spark-xml package on pyspark: `bin/pyspark --packages com.databricks:spark-xml_2.11:0.4.1`.
Added pyspark test.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16585 from viirya/fix-inputfileblock-hadooprdd.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `jdbc` API do not check the `lowerBound` and `upperBound` when we
specified the ``column``, and just throw the following exception:
>```int() argument must be a string or a number, not 'NoneType'```
If we check the parameter, we can give a more friendly suggestion.
## How was this patch tested?
Test using the pyspark shell, without the lowerBound and upperBound parameters.
Author: DjvuLee <lihu@bytedance.com>
Closes#16599 from djvulee/pysparkFix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296 , we reached a consensus that we should hide the external/managed table concept to users and only expose custom table path.
This PR renames `Catalog.createExternalTable` to `createTable`(still keep the old versions for backward compatibility), and only set the table type to EXTERNAL if `path` is specified in options.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in `CatalogSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#16528 from cloud-fan/create-table.
Change is for SQLContext to reuse the active SparkSession during construction if the sparkContext supplied is the same as the currently active SparkContext. Without this change, a new SparkSession is instantiated that results in a Derby error when attempting to create a dataframe using a new SQLContext object even though the SparkContext supplied to the new SQLContext is same as the currently active one. Refer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18687 for details on the error and a repro.
Existing unit tests and a new unit test added to pyspark-sql:
/python/run-tests --python-executables=python --modules=pyspark-sql
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Vinayak <vijoshi5@in.ibm.com>
Author: Vinayak Joshi <vijoshi@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16119 from vijoshi/SPARK-18687_master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SparkSession initialization, we store created the instance of SparkSession into a class variable _instantiatedContext. Next time we can use SparkSession.builder.getOrCreate() to retrieve the existing SparkSession instance.
However, when the active SparkContext is stopped and we create another new SparkContext to use, the existing SparkSession is still associated with the stopped SparkContext. So the operations with this existing SparkSession will be failed.
We need to detect such case in SparkSession and renew the class variable _instantiatedContext if needed.
## How was this patch tested?
New test added in PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16454 from viirya/fix-pyspark-sparksession.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes `UserDefinedFunction._broadcast` and `UserDefinedFunction.__del__` method.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16538 from zero323/SPARK-19164.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allow update mode for non-aggregation streaming queries. It will be same as the append mode if a query has no aggregations.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16520 from zsxwing/update-without-agg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- [X] Make sure all join types are clearly mentioned
- [X] Make join labeling/style consistent
- [X] Make join label ordering docs the same
- [X] Improve join documentation according to above for Scala
- [X] Improve join documentation according to above for Python
- [X] Improve join documentation according to above for R
## How was this patch tested?
No tests b/c docs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Closes#16504 from anabranch/SPARK-19126.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- [X] Fix inconsistencies in function reference for dense rank and dense
- [X] Make all languages equivalent in their reference to `dense_rank` and `rank`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A for docs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Closes#16505 from anabranch/SPARK-19127.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems allowed to not set a key and value for a dict to represent the value is `None` or missing as below:
``` python
spark.createDataFrame([{"x": 1}, {"y": 2}]).show()
```
```
+----+----+
| x| y|
+----+----+
| 1|null|
|null| 2|
+----+----+
```
However, it seems it is not for `Row` as below:
``` python
spark.createDataFrame([Row(x=1), Row(y=2)]).show()
```
``` scala
16/06/19 16:25:56 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 6.0 in stage 66.0 (TID 316)
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Input row doesn't have expected number of values required by the schema. 2 fields are required while 1 values are provided.
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.EvaluatePython$.fromJava(EvaluatePython.scala:147)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$7.apply(SparkSession.scala:656)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$7.apply(SparkSession.scala:656)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$4.apply(SparkPlan.scala:247)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$4.apply(SparkPlan.scala:240)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:780)
```
The behaviour seems right but it seems it might confuse users just like this JIRA was reported.
This PR adds the explanation for `Row` class.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13771 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-13748.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are many locations in the Spark repo where the same word occurs consecutively. Sometimes they are appropriately placed, but many times they are not. This PR removes the inappropriately duplicated words.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A since only docs or comments were updated.
Author: Niranjan Padmanabhan <niranjan.padmanabhan@gmail.com>
Closes#16455 from neurons/np.structure_streaming_doc.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we only have a SQL interface for recovering all the partitions in the directory of a table and update the catalog. `MSCK REPAIR TABLE` or `ALTER TABLE table RECOVER PARTITIONS`. (Actually, very hard for me to remember `MSCK` and have no clue what it means)
After the new "Scalable Partition Handling", the table repair becomes much more important for making visible the data in the created data source partitioned table.
Thus, this PR is to add it into the Catalog interface. After this PR, users can repair the table by
```Scala
spark.catalog.recoverPartitions("testTable")
```
### How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing test cases.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#16356 from gatorsmile/repairTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`_to_seq` wasn't imported.
## How was this patch tested?
Added partitionBy to existing write path unit test
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#16297 from brkyvz/SPARK-18888.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now `StreamingQuery.lastProgress` throws NoSuchElementException and it's hard to be used in Python since Python user will just see Py4jError.
This PR just makes it return null instead.
## How was this patch tested?
`test("lastProgress should be null when recentProgress is empty")`
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16273 from zsxwing/SPARK-18852.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when users use Python UDF in Filter, BatchEvalPython is always generated below FilterExec. However, not all the predicates need to be evaluated after Python UDF execution. Thus, this PR is to push down the determinisitc predicates through `BatchEvalPython`.
```Python
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([(1, "1"), (2, "2"), (1, "2"), (1, "2")], ["key", "value"])
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import udf, col
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import BooleanType
>>> my_filter = udf(lambda a: a < 2, BooleanType())
>>> sel = df.select(col("key"), col("value")).filter((my_filter(col("key"))) & (df.value < "2"))
>>> sel.explain(True)
```
Before the fix, the plan looks like
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter ((isnotnull(value#1) && <lambda>(key#0L)) && (value#1 < 2))
+- LogicalRDD [key#0L, value#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [key#0L, value#1]
+- *Filter ((isnotnull(value#1) && pythonUDF0#9) && (value#1 < 2))
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(key#0L)], [key#0L, value#1, pythonUDF0#9]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[key#0L,value#1]
```
After the fix, the plan looks like
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter ((isnotnull(value#1) && <lambda>(key#0L)) && (value#1 < 2))
+- LogicalRDD [key#0L, value#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [key#0L, value#1]
+- *Filter pythonUDF0#9: boolean
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(key#0L)], [key#0L, value#1, pythonUDF0#9]
+- *Filter (isnotnull(value#1) && (value#1 < 2))
+- Scan ExistingRDD[key#0L,value#1]
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added both unit test cases for `BatchEvalPythonExec` and also add an end-to-end test case in Python test suite.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#16193 from gatorsmile/pythonUDFPredicatePushDown.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`input_file_name` doesn't return filename when working with UDF in PySpark. An example shows the problem:
from pyspark.sql.functions import *
from pyspark.sql.types import *
def filename(path):
return path
sourceFile = udf(filename, StringType())
spark.read.json("tmp.json").select(sourceFile(input_file_name())).show()
+---------------------------+
|filename(input_file_name())|
+---------------------------+
| |
+---------------------------+
The cause of this issue is, we group rows in `BatchEvalPythonExec` for batching processing of PythonUDF. Currently we group rows first and then evaluate expressions on the rows. If the data is less than the required number of rows for a group, the iterator will be consumed to the end before the evaluation. However, once the iterator reaches the end, we will unset input filename. So the input_file_name expression can't return correct filename.
This patch fixes the approach to group the batch of rows. We evaluate the expression first and then group evaluated results to batch.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16115 from viirya/fix-py-udf-input-filename.
Based on an informal survey, users find this option easier to understand / remember.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#16182 from marmbrus/renameRecentProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Here are the major changes in this PR.
- Added the ability to recover `StreamingQuery.id` from checkpoint location, by writing the id to `checkpointLoc/metadata`.
- Added `StreamingQuery.runId` which is unique for every query started and does not persist across restarts. This is to identify each restart of a query separately (same as earlier behavior of `id`).
- Removed auto-generation of `StreamingQuery.name`. The purpose of name was to have the ability to define an identifier across restarts, but since id is precisely that, there is no need for a auto-generated name. This means name becomes purely cosmetic, and is null by default.
- Added `runId` to `StreamingQueryListener` events and `StreamingQueryProgress`.
Implementation details
- Renamed existing `StreamExecutionMetadata` to `OffsetSeqMetadata`, and moved it to the file `OffsetSeq.scala`, because that is what this metadata is tied to. Also did some refactoring to make the code cleaner (got rid of a lot of `.json` and `.getOrElse("{}")`).
- Added the `id` as the new `StreamMetadata`.
- When a StreamingQuery is created it gets or writes the `StreamMetadata` from `checkpointLoc/metadata`.
- All internal logging in `StreamExecution` uses `(name, id, runId)` instead of just `name`
TODO
- [x] Test handling of name=null in json generation of StreamingQueryProgress
- [x] Test handling of name=null in json generation of StreamingQueryListener events
- [x] Test python API of runId
## How was this patch tested?
Updated unit tests and new unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16113 from tdas/SPARK-18657.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As reported in the Jira, there are some weird issues with exploding Python UDFs in SparkSQL.
The following test code can reproduce it. Notice: the following test code is reported to return wrong results in the Jira. However, as I tested on master branch, it causes exception and so can't return any result.
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import *
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>>
>>> df = spark.range(10)
>>>
>>> def return_range(value):
... return [(i, str(i)) for i in range(value - 1, value + 1)]
...
>>> range_udf = udf(return_range, ArrayType(StructType([StructField("integer_val", IntegerType()),
... StructField("string_val", StringType())])))
>>>
>>> df.select("id", explode(range_udf(df.id))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 318, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20))
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1133, in __call__
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 319, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o126.showString.: java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CodegenSupport$class.consume(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.consume(GenerateExec.scala:57)
The cause of this issue is, in `ExtractPythonUDFs` we insert `BatchEvalPythonExec` to run PythonUDFs in batch. `BatchEvalPythonExec` will add extra outputs (e.g., `pythonUDF0`) to original plan. In above case, the original `Range` only has one output `id`. After `ExtractPythonUDFs`, the added `BatchEvalPythonExec` has two outputs `id` and `pythonUDF0`.
Because the output of `GenerateExec` is given after analysis phase, in above case, it is the combination of `id`, i.e., the output of `Range`, and `col`. But in planning phase, we change `GenerateExec`'s child plan to `BatchEvalPythonExec` with additional output attributes.
It will cause no problem in non wholestage codegen. Because when evaluating the additional attributes are projected out the final output of `GenerateExec`.
However, as `GenerateExec` now supports wholestage codegen, the framework will input all the outputs of the child plan to `GenerateExec`. Then when consuming `GenerateExec`'s output data (i.e., calling `consume`), the number of output attributes is different to the output variables in wholestage codegen.
To solve this issue, this patch only gives the generator's output to `GenerateExec` after analysis phase. `GenerateExec`'s output is the combination of its child plan's output and the generator's output. So when we change `GenerateExec`'s child, its output is still correct.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16120 from viirya/fix-py-udf-with-generator.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQuery.explain and exception to Python.
- Fix StreamingQueryException to not expose `OffsetSeq`.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16125 from zsxwing/py-streaming-explain.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Makes `Window.unboundedPreceding` and `Window.unboundedFollowing` backward compatible.
## How was this patch tested?
Pyspark SQL unittests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16123 from zero323/SPARK-17845-follow-up.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQueryStatus.json
- Make it not case class (to avoid unnecessarily exposing implicit object StreamingQueryStatus, consistent with StreamingQueryProgress)
- Add StreamingQuery.status to Python
- Fix post-termination status
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16075 from tdas/SPARK-18516-1.
This PR separates the status of a `StreamingQuery` into two separate APIs:
- `status` - describes the status of a `StreamingQuery` at this moment, including what phase of processing is currently happening and if data is available.
- `recentProgress` - an array of statistics about the most recent microbatches that have executed.
A recent progress contains the following information:
```
{
"id" : "2be8670a-fce1-4859-a530-748f29553bb6",
"name" : "query-29",
"timestamp" : 1479705392724,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303,
"durationMs" : {
"triggerExecution" : 276,
"queryPlanning" : 3,
"getBatch" : 5,
"getOffset" : 3,
"addBatch" : 234,
"walCommit" : 30
},
"currentWatermark" : 0,
"stateOperators" : [ ],
"sources" : [ {
"description" : "KafkaSource[Subscribe[topic-14]]",
"startOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 0,
"4" : 1,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 0
}
},
"endOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 1,
"4" : 2,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 1
}
},
"numRecords" : 3,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303
} ]
}
```
Additionally, in order to make it possible to correlate progress updates across restarts, we change the `id` field from an integer that is unique with in the JVM to a `UUID` that is globally unique.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15954 from marmbrus/queryProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds two of the newly added methods of `Dataset`s to Python:
`withWatermark` and `checkpoint`
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#15921 from brkyvz/py-watermark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I found the documentation for the sample method to be confusing, this adds more clarification across all languages.
- [x] Scala
- [x] Python
- [x] R
- [x] RDD Scala
- [ ] RDD Python with SEED
- [X] RDD Java
- [x] RDD Java with SEED
- [x] RDD Python
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Closes#15815 from anabranch/SPARK-18365.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-18459: triggerId seems like a number that should be increasing with each trigger, whether or not there is data in it. However, actually, triggerId increases only where there is a batch of data in a trigger. So its better to rename it to batchId.
SPARK-18460: triggerDetails was missing from json representation. Fixed it.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15895 from tdas/SPARK-18459.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we use java serialization for the WAL that stores the offsets contained in each batch. This has two main issues:
It can break across spark releases (though this is not the only thing preventing us from upgrading a running query)
It is unnecessarily opaque to the user.
I'd propose we require offsets to provide a user readable serialization and use that instead. JSON is probably a good option.
## How was this patch tested?
Tests were added for KafkaSourceOffset in [KafkaSourceOffsetSuite](external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceOffsetSuite.scala) and for LongOffset in [OffsetSuite](sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/OffsetSuite.scala)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
zsxwing marmbrus
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@gmail.com>
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@clash.local>
Closes#15626 from tcondie/spark-8360.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor doc update that should go to master & branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15747 from felixcheung/pySPARK-14393.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add `to_json` function in contrast with `from_json` in Scala, Java and Python.
It'd be useful if we can convert a same column from/to json. Also, some datasources do not support nested types. If we are forced to save a dataframe into those data sources, we might be able to work around by this function.
The usage is as below:
``` scala
val df = Seq(Tuple1(Tuple1(1))).toDF("a")
df.select(to_json($"a").as("json")).show()
```
``` bash
+--------+
| json|
+--------+
|{"_1":1}|
+--------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#15354 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17764.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
API and programming guide doc changes for Scala, Python and R.
## How was this patch tested?
manual test
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15629 from felixcheung/jsondoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
StreamingQueryStatus exposed through StreamingQueryListener often needs to be recorded (similar to SparkListener events). This PR adds `.json` and `.prettyJson` to `StreamingQueryStatus`, `SourceStatus` and `SinkStatus`.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15476 from tdas/SPARK-17926.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a crossJoin function to the DataFrame API similar to that in Scala. Joins with no condition (cartesian products) must be specified with the crossJoin API
## How was this patch tested?
Added python tests to ensure that an AnalysisException if a cartesian product is specified without crossJoin(), and that cartesian products can execute if specified via crossJoin()
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#15493 from srinathshankar/crosspython.
Currently pyspark can only call the builtin java UDF, but can not call custom java UDF. It would be better to allow that. 2 benefits:
* Leverage the power of rich third party java library
* Improve the performance. Because if we use python UDF, python daemons will be started on worker which will affect the performance.
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#9766 from zjffdu/SPARK-11775.
[SPARK-11905](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11905) added support for `persist`/`cache` for `Dataset`. However, there is no user-facing API to check if a `Dataset` is cached and if so what the storage level is. This PR adds `getStorageLevel` to `Dataset`, analogous to `RDD.getStorageLevel`.
Updated `DatasetCacheSuite`.
Author: Nick Pentreath <nickp@za.ibm.com>
Closes#13780 from MLnick/ds-storagelevel.
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
