## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, BroadcastNestedLoopJoin is implemented for worst case, it's too slow, very easy to hang forever. This PR will create fast path for some joinType and buildSide, also improve the worst case (will use much less memory than before).
Before this PR, one task requires O(N*K) + O(K) in worst cases, N is number of rows from one partition of streamed table, it could hang the job (because of GC).
In order to workaround this for InnerJoin, we have to disable auto-broadcast, switch to CartesianProduct: This could be workaround for InnerJoin, see https://forums.databricks.com/questions/6747/how-do-i-get-a-cartesian-product-of-a-huge-dataset.html
In this PR, we will have fast path for these joins :
InnerJoin with BuildLeft or BuildRight
LeftOuterJoin with BuildRight
RightOuterJoin with BuildLeft
LeftSemi with BuildRight
These fast paths are all stream based (take one pass on streamed table), required O(1) memory.
All other join types and build types will take two pass on streamed table, one pass to find the matched rows that includes streamed part, which require O(1) memory, another pass to find the rows from build table that does not have a matched row from streamed table, which required O(K) memory, K is the number rows from build side, one bit per row, should be much smaller than the memory for broadcast. The following join types work in this way:
LeftOuterJoin with BuildLeft
RightOuterJoin with BuildRight
FullOuterJoin with BuildLeft or BuildRight
LeftSemi with BuildLeft
This PR also added tests for all the join types for BroadcastNestedLoopJoin.
After this PR, for InnerJoin with one small table, BroadcastNestedLoopJoin should be faster than CartesianProduct, we don't need that workaround anymore.
## How was the this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11328 from davies/nested_loop.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Predicates shouldn't be pushed through project with nondeterministic field(s).
See https://github.com/graphframes/graphframes/pull/23 and SPARK-13473 for more details.
This PR targets master, branch-1.6, and branch-1.5.
## How was this patch tested?
A test case is added in `FilterPushdownSuite`. It constructs a query plan where a filter is over a project with a nondeterministic field. Optimized query plan shouldn't change in this case.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#11348 from liancheng/spark-13473-no-ppd-through-nondeterministic-project-field.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR mostly rewrite the ColumnPruning rule to support most of the SQL logical plans (except those for Dataset).
This PR also fix a bug in Generate, it should always output UnsafeRow, added an regression test for that.
## How was this patch tested?
This is test by unit tests, also manually test with TPCDS Q78, which could prune all unused columns successfully, improved the performance by 78% (from 22s to 12s).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11354 from davies/fix_column_pruning.
This PR adds a new abstraction called an `ExpressionSet` which attempts to canonicalize expressions to remove cosmetic differences. Deterministic expressions that are in the set after canonicalization will always return the same answer given the same input (i.e. false positives should not be possible). However, it is possible that two canonical expressions that are not equal will in fact return the same answer given any input (i.e. false negatives are possible).
```scala
val set = AttributeSet('a + 1 :: 1 + 'a :: Nil)
set.iterator => Iterator('a + 1)
set.contains('a + 1) => true
set.contains(1 + 'a) => true
set.contains('a + 2) => false
```
Other relevant changes include:
- Since this concept overlaps with the existing `semanticEquals` and `semanticHash`, those functions are also ported to this new infrastructure.
- A memoized `canonicalized` version of the expression is added as a `lazy val` to `Expression` and is used by both `semanticEquals` and `ExpressionSet`.
- A set of unit tests for `ExpressionSet` are added
- Tests which expect `semanticEquals` to be less intelligent than it now is are updated.
As a followup, we should consider auditing the places where we do `O(n)` `semanticEquals` operations and replace them with `ExpressionSet`. We should also consider consolidating `AttributeSet` as a specialized factory for an `ExpressionSet.`
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#11338 from marmbrus/expressionSet.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reverting SPARK-13376 (d563c8fa01) affects the test added by SPARK-13383. So, I am fixing the test.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#11355 from yhuai/SPARK-13383-fix-test.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13383
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we do column pruning in Optimizer, we put additional Project on top of a logical plan. However, when we already wrap a BroadcastHint on a logical plan, the added Project will hide BroadcastHint after later execution.
We should take care of BroadcastHint when we do column pruning.
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit test is added.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11260 from viirya/keep-broadcasthint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR pull all the keywords (and some others) from ExpressionParser.g as KeywordParser.g, because ExpressionParser is too large to compile.
## How was the this patch tested?
unit test, maven build
Closes#11329
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11331 from davies/split_expr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR mostly rewrite the ColumnPruning rule to support most of the SQL logical plans (except those for Dataset).
## How was the this patch tested?
This is test by unit tests, also manually test with TPCDS Q78, which could prune all unused columns successfully, improved the performance by 78% (from 22s to 12s).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11256 from davies/fix_column_pruning.
The current implementation of statistics of UnaryNode does not considering output (for example, Project may product much less columns than it's child), we should considering it to have a better guess.
We usually only join with few columns from a parquet table, the size of projected plan could be much smaller than the original parquet files. Having a better guess of size help we choose between broadcast join or sort merge join.
After this PR, I saw a few queries choose broadcast join other than sort merge join without turning spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold for every query, ended up with about 6-8X improvements on end-to-end time.
We use `defaultSize` of DataType to estimate the size of a column, currently For DecimalType/StringType/BinaryType and UDT, we are over-estimate too much (4096 Bytes), so this PR change them to some more reasonable values. Here are the new defaultSize for them:
DecimalType: 8 or 16 bytes, based on the precision
StringType: 20 bytes
BinaryType: 100 bytes
UDF: default size of SQL type
These numbers are not perfect (hard to have a perfect number for them), but should be better than 4096.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11210 from davies/statics.
The type checking functions of `If` and `UnwrapOption` are fixed to eliminate spurious failures. `UnwrapOption` was checking for an input of `ObjectType` but `ObjectType`'s accept function was hard coded to return `false`. `If`'s type check was returning a false negative in the case that the two options differed only by nullability.
Tests added:
- an end-to-end regression test is added to `DatasetSuite` for the reported failure.
- all the unit tests in `ExpressionEncoderSuite` are augmented to also confirm successful analysis. These tests are actually what pointed out the additional issues with `If` resolution.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#11316 from marmbrus/datasetOptions.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Ensure that all built-in expressions can be mapped to its SQL representation if there is one (e.g. ScalaUDF doesn't have a SQL representation). The function lists are from the expression list in `FunctionRegistry`.
window functions, grouping sets functions (`cube`, `rollup`, `grouping`, `grouping_id`), generator functions (`explode` and `json_tuple`) are covered by separate JIRA and PRs. Thus, this PR does not cover them. Except these functions, all the built-in expressions are covered. For details, see the list in `ExpressionToSQLSuite`.
Fixed a few issues. For example, the `prettyName` of `approx_count_distinct` is not right. The `sql` of `hash` function is not right, since the `hash` function does not accept `seed`.
Additionally, also correct the order of expressions in `FunctionRegistry` so that people are easier to find which functions are missing.
cc liancheng
#### How was the this patch tested?
Added two test cases in LogicalPlanToSQLSuite for covering `not like` and `not in`.
Added a new test suite `ExpressionToSQLSuite` to cover the functions:
1. misc non-aggregate functions + complex type creators + null expressions
2. math functions
3. aggregate functions
4. string functions
5. date time functions + calendar interval
6. collection functions
7. misc functions
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11314 from gatorsmile/expressionToSQL.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix all typos in all markdown files under `docs` module,
and fixes similar typos in other comments, too.
## How was the this patch tested?
manual tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11300 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_fix_typos.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13321
The following SQL can not be parsed with current parser:
SELECT `u_1`.`id` FROM (((SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) AS u_1
We should fix it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11204 from viirya/nested-union.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds equality operators to UDT classes so that they can be correctly tested for dataType equality during union operations.
This was previously causing `"AnalysisException: u"unresolved operator 'Union;""` when trying to unionAll two dataframes with UDT columns as below.
```
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql import types
schema = types.StructType([types.StructField("point", PythonOnlyUDT(), True)])
a = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(1.0, 2.0)]], schema)
b = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(3.0, 4.0)]], schema)
c = a.unionAll(b)
```
## How was the this patch tested?
Tested using two unit tests in sql/test.py and the DataFrameSuite.
Additional information here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13410
Author: Franklyn D'souza <franklynd@gmail.com>
Closes#11279 from damnMeddlingKid/udt-union-all.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a step towards merging `SQLContext` and `HiveContext`. A new internal Catalog API was introduced in #10982 and extended in #11069. This patch introduces an implementation of this API using `HiveClient`, an existing interface to Hive. It also extends `HiveClient` with additional calls to Hive that are needed to complete the catalog implementation.
*Where should I start reviewing?* The new catalog introduced is `HiveCatalog`. This class is relatively simple because it just calls `HiveClientImpl`, where most of the new logic is. I would not start with `HiveClient`, `HiveQl`, or `HiveMetastoreCatalog`, which are modified mainly because of a refactor.
*Why is this patch so big?* I had to refactor HiveClient to remove an intermediate representation of databases, tables, partitions etc. After this refactor `CatalogTable` convert directly to and from `HiveTable` (etc.). Otherwise we would have to first convert `CatalogTable` to the intermediate representation and then convert that to HiveTable, which is messy.
The new class hierarchy is as follows:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.Catalog
- org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.InMemoryCatalog
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveCatalog
```
Note that, as of this patch, none of these classes are currently used anywhere yet. This will come in the future before the Spark 2.0 release.
## How was the this patch tested?
All existing unit tests, and HiveCatalogSuite that extends CatalogTestCases.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11293 from rxin/hive-catalog.
Quite a few Spark SQL join operators broadcast one side of the join to all nodes. The are a few problems with this:
- This conflates broadcasting (a data exchange) with joining. Data exchanges should be managed by a different operator.
- All these nodes implement their own (duplicate) broadcasting logic.
- Re-use of indices is quite hard.
This PR defines both a ```BroadcastDistribution``` and ```BroadcastPartitioning```, these contain a `BroadcastMode`. The `BroadcastMode` defines the way in which we transform the Array of `InternalRow`'s into an index. We currently support the following `BroadcastMode`'s:
- IdentityBroadcastMode: This broadcasts the rows in their original form.
- HashSetBroadcastMode: This applies a projection to the input rows, deduplicates these rows and broadcasts the resulting `Set`.
- HashedRelationBroadcastMode: This transforms the input rows into a `HashedRelation`, and broadcasts this index.
To match this distribution we implement a ```BroadcastExchange``` operator which will perform the broadcast for us, and have ```EnsureRequirements``` plan this operator. The old Exchange operator has been renamed into ShuffleExchange in order to clearly separate between Shuffled and Broadcasted exchanges. Finally the classes in Exchange.scala have been moved to a dedicated package.
cc rxin davies
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11083 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13136.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes some minor issues (documentation, test flakiness, test organization) with #11190, which was merged earlier tonight.
## How was the this patch tested?
unit tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11285 from rxin/subquery.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch renames logical.Subquery to logical.SubqueryAlias, which is a more appropriate name for this operator (versus subqueries as expressions).
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11288 from rxin/SPARK-13420.
This PR introduces several major changes:
1. Replacing `Expression.prettyString` with `Expression.sql`
The `prettyString` method is mostly an internal, developer faced facility for debugging purposes, and shouldn't be exposed to users.
1. Using SQL-like representation as column names for selected fields that are not named expression (back-ticks and double quotes should be removed)
Before, we were using `prettyString` as column names when possible, and sometimes the result column names can be weird. Here are several examples:
Expression | `prettyString` | `sql` | Note
------------------ | -------------- | ---------- | ---------------
`a && b` | `a && b` | `a AND b` |
`a.getField("f")` | `a[f]` | `a.f` | `a` is a struct
1. Adding trait `NonSQLExpression` extending from `Expression` for expressions that don't have a SQL representation (e.g. Scala UDF/UDAF and Java/Scala object expressions used for encoders)
`NonSQLExpression.sql` may return an arbitrary user facing string representation of the expression.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10757 from liancheng/spark-12799.simplify-expression-string-methods.
```scala
// case 1: missing sort columns are resolvable if join is true
sql("SELECT explode(a) AS val, b FROM data WHERE b < 2 order by val, c")
// case 2: missing sort columns are not resolvable if join is false. Thus, issue an error message in this case
sql("SELECT explode(a) AS val FROM data order by val, c")
```
When sort columns are not in `Generate`, we can resolve them when `join` is equal to `true`. Still trying to add more test cases for the other `UnaryNode` types.
Could you review the changes? davies cloud-fan Thanks!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11198 from gatorsmile/missingInSort.
Conversion of outer joins, if the predicates in filter conditions can restrict the result sets so that all null-supplying rows are eliminated.
- `full outer` -> `inner` if both sides have such predicates
- `left outer` -> `inner` if the right side has such predicates
- `right outer` -> `inner` if the left side has such predicates
- `full outer` -> `left outer` if only the left side has such predicates
- `full outer` -> `right outer` if only the right side has such predicates
If applicable, this can greatly improve the performance, since outer join is much slower than inner join, full outer join is much slower than left/right outer join.
The original PR is https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10542
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10567 from gatorsmile/outerJoinEliminationByFilterCond.
This PR adds support for rewriting constraints if there are aliases in the query plan. For e.g., if there is a query of form `SELECT a, a AS b`, any constraints on `a` now also apply to `b`.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13091
cc marmbrus
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#11144 from sameeragarwal/alias.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13384
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we de-duplicate attributes in Analyzer, we create new attributes. However, we don't keep original qualifiers. Some plans will be failed to analysed. We should keep original qualifiers in new attributes.
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit test is added.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11261 from viirya/keep-attr-qualifiers.
`rand` and `randn` functions with a `seed` argument are commonly used. Based on the common sense, the results of `rand` and `randn` should be deterministic if the `seed` parameter value is provided. For example, in MS SQL Server, it also has a function `rand`. Regarding the parameter `seed`, the description is like: ```Seed is an integer expression (tinyint, smallint, or int) that gives the seed value. If seed is not specified, the SQL Server Database Engine assigns a seed value at random. For a specified seed value, the result returned is always the same.```
Update: the current implementation is unable to generate deterministic results when the partitions are not fixed. This PR documents this issue in the function descriptions.
jkbradley hit an issue and provided an example in the following JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13333
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11232 from gatorsmile/randSeed.
Currently, the columns in projects of Expand that are not used by Aggregate are not pruned, this PR fix that.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11225 from davies/fix_pruning_expand.
Add `LazilyGenerateOrdering` to support generated ordering for `RangePartitioner` of `Exchange` instead of `InterpretedOrdering`.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#10894 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-12976.
Using GroupingSets will generate a wrong result when Aggregate Functions containing GroupBy columns.
This PR is to fix it. Since the code changes are very small. Maybe we also can merge it to 1.6
For example, the following query returns a wrong result:
```scala
sql("select course, sum(earnings) as sum from courseSales group by course, earnings" +
" grouping sets((), (course), (course, earnings))" +
" order by course, sum").show()
```
Before the fix, the results are like
```
[null,null]
[Java,null]
[Java,20000.0]
[Java,30000.0]
[dotNET,null]
[dotNET,5000.0]
[dotNET,10000.0]
[dotNET,48000.0]
```
After the fix, the results become correct:
```
[null,113000.0]
[Java,20000.0]
[Java,30000.0]
[Java,50000.0]
[dotNET,5000.0]
[dotNET,10000.0]
[dotNET,48000.0]
[dotNET,63000.0]
```
UPDATE: This PR also deprecated the external column: GROUPING__ID.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11100 from gatorsmile/groupingSets.
This patch adds a new optimizer rule for performing limit pushdown. Limits will now be pushed down in two cases:
- If a limit is on top of a `UNION ALL` operator, then a partition-local limit operator will be pushed to each of the union operator's children.
- If a limit is on top of an `OUTER JOIN` then a partition-local limit will be pushed to one side of the join. For `LEFT OUTER` and `RIGHT OUTER` joins, the limit will be pushed to the left and right side, respectively. For `FULL OUTER` join, we will only push limits when at most one of the inputs is already limited: if one input is limited we will push a smaller limit on top of it and if neither input is limited then we will limit the input which is estimated to be larger.
These optimizations were proposed previously by gatorsmile in #10451 and #10454, but those earlier PRs were closed and deferred for later because at that time Spark's physical `Limit` operator would trigger a full shuffle to perform global limits so there was a chance that pushdowns could actually harm performance by causing additional shuffles/stages. In #7334, we split the `Limit` operator into separate `LocalLimit` and `GlobalLimit` operators, so we can now push down only local limits (which don't require extra shuffles). This patch is based on both of gatorsmile's patches, with changes and simplifications due to partition-local-limiting.
When we push down the limit, we still keep the original limit in place, so we need a mechanism to ensure that the optimizer rule doesn't keep pattern-matching once the limit has been pushed down. In order to handle this, this patch adds a `maxRows` method to `SparkPlan` which returns the maximum number of rows that the plan can compute, then defines the pushdown rules to only push limits to children if the children's maxRows are greater than the limit's maxRows. This idea is carried over from #10451; see that patch for additional discussion.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#11121 from JoshRosen/limit-pushdown-2.
The java `Calendar` object is expensive to create. I have a sub query like this `SELECT a, b, c FROM table UV WHERE (datediff(UV.visitDate, '1997-01-01')>=0 AND datediff(UV.visitDate, '2015-01-01')<=0))`
The table stores `visitDate` as String type and has 3 billion records. A `Calendar` object is created every time `DateTimeUtils.stringToDate` is called. By reusing the `Calendar` object, I saw about 20 seconds performance improvement for this stage.
Author: Carson Wang <carson.wang@intel.com>
Closes#11090 from carsonwang/SPARK-13185.
The current implementation of ResolveSortReferences can only push one missing attributes into it's child, it failed to analyze TPCDS Q98, because of there are two missing attributes in that (one from Window, another from Aggregate).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11153 from davies/resolve_sort.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13277
There is an ANTLR warning during compilation:
warning(200): org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlParser.g:938:7:
Decision can match input such as "KW_USING Identifier" using multiple alternatives: 2, 3
As a result, alternative(s) 3 were disabled for that input
This patch is to fix it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11168 from viirya/fix-parser-using.
The parser currently parses the following strings without a hitch:
* Table Identifier:
* `a.b.c` should fail, but results in the following table identifier `a.b`
* `table!#` should fail, but results in the following table identifier `table`
* Expression
* `1+2 r+e` should fail, but results in the following expression `1 + 2`
This PR fixes this by adding terminated rules for both expression parsing and table identifier parsing.
cc cloud-fan (we discussed this in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649) jayadevanmurali (this causes your PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051 to fail)
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11159 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13276.
Grouping() returns a column is aggregated or not, grouping_id() returns the aggregation levels.
grouping()/grouping_id() could be used with window function, but does not work in having/sort clause, will be fixed by another PR.
The GROUPING__ID/grouping_id() in Hive is wrong (according to docs), we also did it wrongly, this PR change that to match the behavior in most databases (also the docs of Hive).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10677 from davies/grouping.
Some analysis rules generate aliases or auxiliary attribute references with the same name but different expression IDs. For example, `ResolveAggregateFunctions` introduces `havingCondition` and `aggOrder`, and `DistinctAggregationRewriter` introduces `gid`.
This is OK for normal query execution since these attribute references get expression IDs. However, it's troublesome when converting resolved query plans back to SQL query strings since expression IDs are erased.
Here's an example Spark 1.6.0 snippet for illustration:
```scala
sqlContext.range(10).select('id as 'a, 'id as 'b).registerTempTable("t")
sqlContext.sql("SELECT SUM(a) FROM t GROUP BY a, b ORDER BY COUNT(a), COUNT(b)").explain(true)
```
The above code produces the following resolved plan:
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
_c0: bigint
Project [_c0#101L]
+- Sort [aggOrder#102L ASC,aggOrder#103L ASC], true
+- Aggregate [a#47L,b#48L], [(sum(a#47L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS _c0#101L,(count(a#47L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS aggOrder#102L,(count(b#48L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS aggOrder#103L]
+- Subquery t
+- Project [id#46L AS a#47L,id#46L AS b#48L]
+- LogicalRDD [id#46L], MapPartitionsRDD[44] at range at <console>:26
```
Here we can see that both aggregate expressions in `ORDER BY` are extracted into an `Aggregate` operator, and both of them are named `aggOrder` with different expression IDs.
The solution is to automatically add the expression IDs into the attribute name for the Alias and AttributeReferences that are generated by Analyzer in SQL Generation.
In this PR, it also resolves another issue. Users could use the same name as the internally generated names. The duplicate names should not cause name ambiguity. When resolving the column, Catalyst should not pick the column that is internally generated.
Could you review the solution? marmbrus liancheng
I did not set the newly added flag for all the alias and attribute reference generated by Analyzers. Please let me know if I should do it? Thank you!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11050 from gatorsmile/namingConflicts.
This PR improve the lookup of BytesToBytesMap by:
1. Generate code for calculate the hash code of grouping keys.
2. Do not use MemoryLocation, fetch the baseObject and offset for key and value directly (remove the indirection).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11010 from davies/gen_map.
Adds the benchmark results as comments.
The codegen version is slower than the interpreted version for `simple` case becasue of 3 reasons:
1. codegen version use a more complex hash algorithm than interpreted version, i.e. `Murmur3_x86_32.hashInt` vs [simple multiplication and addition](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/rows.scala#L153).
2. codegen version will write the hash value to a row first and then read it out. I tried to create a `GenerateHasher` that can generate code to return hash value directly and got about 60% speed up for the `simple` case, does it worth?
3. the row in `simple` case only has one int field, so the runtime reflection may be removed because of branch prediction, which makes the interpreted version faster.
The `array` case is also slow for similar reasons, e.g. array elements are of same type, so interpreted version can probably get rid of runtime reflection by branch prediction.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10917 from cloud-fan/hash-benchmark.
nullability should only be considered as an optimization rather than part of the type system, so instead of failing analysis for mismatch nullability, we should pass analysis and add runtime null check.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11035 from cloud-fan/ignore-nullability.
