## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The test `cast string to timestamp` used to run for all time zones. So it run for more than 600 times. Running the tests for a significant subset of time zones is probably good enough and doing this in a randomized manner enforces anyway that we are going to test all time zones in different runs.
## How was this patch tested?
the test time reduces to 11 seconds from more than 2 minutes
Closes#22631 from mgaido91/SPARK-25605.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reduce `DateExpressionsSuite.Hour` test time costs in Jenkins by reduce iteration times.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests on my local machine.
before:
```
- Hour (34 seconds, 54 milliseconds)
```
after:
```
- Hour (2 seconds, 697 milliseconds)
```
Closes#22632 from wangyum/SPARK-25606.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR changes the test introduced for SPARK-22226, so that we don't run analysis and optimization on the plan. The scope of the test is code generation and running the above mentioned operation is expensive and useless for the test.
The UT was also moved to the `CodeGenerationSuite` which is a better place given the scope of the test.
## How was this patch tested?
running the UT before SPARK-22226 fails, after it passes. The execution time is about 50% the original one. On my laptop this means that the test now runs in about 23 seconds (instead of 50 seconds).
Closes#22629 from mgaido91/SPARK-25609.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In #20850 when writing non-null decimals, instead of zero-ing all the 16 allocated bytes, we zero-out only the padding bytes. Since we always allocate 16 bytes, if the number of bytes needed for a decimal is lower than 9, then this means that the bytes between 8 and 16 are not zero-ed.
I see 2 solutions here:
- we can zero-out all the bytes in advance as it was done before #20850 (safer solution IMHO);
- we can allocate only the needed bytes (may be a bit more efficient in terms of memory used, but I have not investigated the feasibility of this option).
Hence I propose here the first solution in order to fix the correctness issue. We can eventually switch to the second if we think is more efficient later.
## How was this patch tested?
Running the test attached in the JIRA + added UT
Closes#22602 from mgaido91/SPARK-25582.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename method `benchmark` in `BenchmarkBase` as `runBenchmarkSuite `. Also add comments.
Currently the method name `benchmark` is a bit confusing. Also the name is the same as instances of `Benchmark`:
f246813afb/sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcReadBenchmark.scala (L330-L339)
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#22599 from gengliangwang/renameBenchmarkSuite.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is to bump the master branch version to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22606 from gatorsmile/bump3.0.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#22519 introduced a bug when the attributes in the pivot clause are cosmetically different from the output ones (eg. different case). In particular, the problem is that the PR used a `Set[Attribute]` instead of an `AttributeSet`.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#22582 from mgaido91/SPARK-25505_followup.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a rule to force `.toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT)` or `toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT)`.
It produces an error as below:
```
[error] Are you sure that you want to use toUpperCase or toLowerCase without the root locale? In most cases, you
[error] should use toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT) or toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT) instead.
[error] If you must use toUpperCase or toLowerCase without the root locale, wrap the code block with
[error] // scalastyle:off caselocale
[error] .toUpperCase
[error] .toLowerCase
[error] // scalastyle:on caselocale
```
This PR excludes the cases above for SQL code path for external calls like table name, column name and etc.
For test suites, or when it's clear there's no locale problem like Turkish locale problem, it uses `Locale.ROOT`.
One minor problem is, `UTF8String` has both methods, `toLowerCase` and `toUpperCase`, and the new rule detects them as well. They are ignored.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and Jenkins tests.
Closes#22581 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-25565.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extended the `schema_of_json()` function, and accept JSON options since they can impact on schema inferring. Purpose is to support the same options that `from_json` can use during schema inferring.
## How was this patch tested?
Added SQL, Python and Scala tests (`JsonExpressionsSuite` and `JsonFunctionsSuite`) that checks JSON options are used.
Closes#22442 from MaxGekk/schema_of_json-options.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**Description from the JIRA :**
Currently, to collect the statistics of all the columns, users need to specify the names of all the columns when calling the command "ANALYZE TABLE ... FOR COLUMNS...". This is not user friendly. Instead, we can introduce the following SQL command to achieve it without specifying the column names.
```
ANALYZE TABLE [db_name.]tablename COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS;
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests in SparkSqlParserSuite and StatisticsSuite
Closes#22566 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25458.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The grouping columns from a Pivot query are inferred as "input columns - pivot columns - pivot aggregate columns", where input columns are the output of the child relation of Pivot. The grouping columns will be the leading columns in the pivot output and they should preserve the same order as specified by the input. For example,
```
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT course, earnings, "a" as a, "z" as z, "b" as b, "y" as y, "c" as c, "x" as x, "d" as d, "w" as w
FROM courseSales
)
PIVOT (
sum(earnings)
FOR course IN ('dotNET', 'Java')
)
```
The output columns should be "a, z, b, y, c, x, d, w, ..." but now it is "a, b, c, d, w, x, y, z, ..."
The fix is to use the child plan's `output` instead of `outputSet` so that the order can be preserved.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#22519 from maryannxue/spark-25505.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `show create table` will show a lot of generated attributes for views that created by older Spark version. This PR will basically revert https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19272 back, so when you `DESC [FORMATTED|EXTENDED] view` will show the original view DDL text.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#22458 from zheyuan28/testbranch.
Lead-authored-by: Chris Zhao <chris.zhao@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Zhao <chris.zhao@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are 2 places we check for problematic `InSubquery`: the rule `ResolveSubquery` and `InSubquery.checkInputDataTypes`. We should unify them.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#22563 from cloud-fan/followup.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As per the discussion in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22553#pullrequestreview-159192221,
override `filterKeys` violates the documented semantics.
This PR is to remove it and add documentation.
Also fix one potential non-serializable map in `FileStreamOptions`.
The only one call of `CaseInsensitiveMap`'s `filterKeys` left is
c3c45cbd76/sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveOptions.scala (L88-L90)
But this one is OK.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#22562 from gengliangwang/SPARK-25541-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Thanks for bahchis reporting this. It is more like a follow up work for #16581, this PR fix the scenario of Python UDF accessing attributes from both side of join in join condition.
## How was this patch tested?
Add regression tests in PySpark and `BatchEvalPythonExecSuite`.
Closes#22326 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-25314.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ElementAt, when first argument is MapType, we should coerce the key type and the second argument based on findTightestCommonType. This is not happening currently. We may produce wrong output as we will incorrectly downcast the right hand side double expression to int.
```SQL
spark-sql> select element_at(map(1,"one", 2, "two"), 2.2);
two
```
Also, when the first argument is ArrayType, the second argument should be an integer type or a smaller integral type that can be safely casted to an integer type. Currently we may do an unsafe cast. In the following case, we should fail with an error as 2.2 is not a integer index. But instead we down cast it to int currently and return a result instead.
```SQL
spark-sql> select element_at(array(1,2), 1.24D);
1
```
This PR also supports implicit cast between two MapTypes. I have followed similar logic that exists today to do implicit casts between two array types.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests in DataFrameFunctionSuite, TypeCoercionSuite.
Closes#22544 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25522.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have an agreement that the behavior of `from/to_utc_timestamp` is corrected, although the function itself doesn't make much sense in Spark: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23715
This PR improves the document.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22543 from cloud-fan/doc.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `UnsafeProjectionBenchmark` to use main method.
Generate benchmark result:
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "catalyst/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.UnsafeProjectionBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual test
Closes#22493 from yucai/SPARK-25485.
Lead-authored-by: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Yucai Yu <yucai.yu@foxmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023 proposed to allow precision lose during decimal operations, to reduce the possibilities of overflow. This is a behavior change and is protected by the DECIMAL_OPERATIONS_ALLOW_PREC_LOSS config. However, that PR introduced another behavior change: pick a minimum precision for integral literals, which is not protected by a config. This PR add a new config for it: `spark.sql.literal.pickMinimumPrecision`.
This can allow users to work around issue in SPARK-25454, which is caused by a long-standing bug of negative scale.
## How was this patch tested?
a new test
Closes#22494 from cloud-fan/decimal.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Describe spark.sql.parquet.writeLegacyFormat property in Spark SQL, DataFrames and Datasets Guide.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22453 from seancxmao/SPARK-20937.
Authored-by: seancxmao <seancxmao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR contains 3 optimizations:
1) it improves significantly the operation `--` on `AttributeSet`. As a benchmark for the `--` operation, the following code has been run
```
test("AttributeSet -- benchmark") {
val attrSetA = AttributeSet((1 to 100).map { i => AttributeReference(s"c$i", IntegerType)() })
val attrSetB = AttributeSet(attrSetA.take(80).toSeq)
val attrSetC = AttributeSet((1 to 100).map { i => AttributeReference(s"c2_$i", IntegerType)() })
val attrSetD = AttributeSet((attrSetA.take(50) ++ attrSetC.take(50)).toSeq)
val attrSetE = AttributeSet((attrSetC.take(50) ++ attrSetA.take(50)).toSeq)
val n_iter = 1000000
val t0 = System.nanoTime()
(1 to n_iter) foreach { _ =>
val r1 = attrSetA -- attrSetB
val r2 = attrSetA -- attrSetC
val r3 = attrSetA -- attrSetD
val r4 = attrSetA -- attrSetE
}
val t1 = System.nanoTime()
val totalTime = t1 - t0
println(s"Average time: ${totalTime / n_iter} us")
}
```
The results are:
```
Before PR - Average time: 67674 us (100 %)
After PR - Average time: 28827 us (42.6 %)
```
2) In `ColumnPruning`, it replaces the occurrences of `(attributeSet1 -- attributeSet2).nonEmpty` with `attributeSet1.subsetOf(attributeSet2)` which is order of magnitudes more efficient (especially where there are many attributes). Running the previous benchmark replacing `--` with `subsetOf` returns:
```
Average time: 67 us (0.1 %)
```
3) Provides a more efficient way of building `AttributeSet`s, which can greatly improve the performance of the methods `references` and `outputSet` of `Expression` and `QueryPlan`. This basically avoids unneeded operations (eg. creating many `AttributeEqual` wrapper classes which could be avoided)
The overall effect of those optimizations has been tested on `ColumnPruning` with the following benchmark:
```
test("ColumnPruning benchmark") {
val attrSetA = (1 to 100).map { i => AttributeReference(s"c$i", IntegerType)() }
val attrSetB = attrSetA.take(80)
val attrSetC = attrSetA.take(20).map(a => Alias(Add(a, Literal(1)), s"${a.name}_1")())
val input = LocalRelation(attrSetA)
val query1 = Project(attrSetB, Project(attrSetA, input)).analyze
val query2 = Project(attrSetC, Project(attrSetA, input)).analyze
val query3 = Project(attrSetA, Project(attrSetA, input)).analyze
val nIter = 100000
val t0 = System.nanoTime()
(1 to nIter).foreach { _ =>
ColumnPruning(query1)
ColumnPruning(query2)
ColumnPruning(query3)
}
val t1 = System.nanoTime()
val totalTime = t1 - t0
println(s"Average time: ${totalTime / nIter} us")
}
```
The output of the test is:
```
Before PR - Average time: 733471 us (100 %)
After PR - Average time: 362455 us (49.4 %)
```
The performance improvement has been evaluated also on the `SQLQueryTestSuite`'s queries:
```
(before) org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ColumnPruning 518413198 / 1377707172 2756 / 15717
(after) org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ColumnPruning 415432579 / 1121147950 2756 / 15717
% Running time 80.1% / 81.3%
```
Also other rules benefit especially from (3), despite the impact is lower, eg:
```
(before) org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveReferences 307341442 / 623436806 2154 / 16480
(after) org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveReferences 290511312 / 560962495 2154 / 16480
% Running time 94.5% / 90.0%
```
The reason why the impact on the `SQLQueryTestSuite`'s queries is lower compared to the other benchmark is that the optimizations are more significant when the number of attributes involved is higher. Since in the tests we often have very few attributes, the effect there is lower.
## How was this patch tested?
run benchmarks + existing UTs
Closes#22364 from mgaido91/SPARK-25379.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`CaseInsensitiveMap` is declared as Serializable. However, it is no serializable after `-` operator or `filterKeys` method.
This PR fix the issue by overriding the operator `-` and method `filterKeys`. So the we can avoid potential `NotSerializableException` on using `CaseInsensitiveMap`.
## How was this patch tested?
New test suite.
Closes#22553 from gengliangwang/fixCaseInsensitiveMap.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Spark has 7 `withTempPath` and 6 `withSQLConf` functions. This PR aims to remove duplicated and inconsistent code and reduce them to the following meaningful implementations.
**withTempPath**
- `SQLHelper.withTempPath`: The one which was used in `SQLTestUtils`.
**withSQLConf**
- `SQLHelper.withSQLConf`: The one which was used in `PlanTest`.
- `ExecutorSideSQLConfSuite.withSQLConf`: The one which doesn't throw `AnalysisException` on StaticConf changes.
- `SQLTestUtils.withSQLConf`: The one which overrides intentionally to change the active session.
```scala
protected override def withSQLConf(pairs: (String, String)*)(f: => Unit): Unit = {
SparkSession.setActiveSession(spark)
super.withSQLConf(pairs: _*)(f)
}
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.
Closes#22548 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-25534.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR introduces new JSON option `pretty` which allows to turn on `DefaultPrettyPrinter` of `Jackson`'s Json generator. New option is useful in exploring of deep nested columns and in converting of JSON columns in more readable representation (look at the added test).
## How was this patch tested?
Added rount trip test which convert an JSON string to pretty representation via `from_json()` and `to_json()`.
Closes#22534 from MaxGekk/pretty-json.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add the legacy prefix for spark.sql.execution.pandas.groupedMap.assignColumnsByPosition and rename it to spark.sql.legacy.execution.pandas.groupedMap.assignColumnsByName
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#22540 from gatorsmile/renameAssignColumnsByPosition.
Lead-authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch reverts entirely all the regr_* functions added in SPARK-23907. These were added by mgaido91 (and proposed by gatorsmile) to improve compatibility with other database systems, without any actual use cases. However, they are very rarely used, and in Spark there are much better ways to compute these functions, due to Spark's flexibility in exposing real programming APIs.
I'm going through all the APIs added in Spark 2.4 and I think we should revert these. If there are strong enough demands and more use cases, we can add them back in the future pretty easily.
## How was this patch tested?
Reverted test cases also.
Closes#22541 from rxin/SPARK-23907.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ArrayRemove, we currently cast the right hand side expression to match the element type of the left hand side Array. This may result in down casting and may return wrong result or questionable result.
Example :
```SQL
spark-sql> select array_remove(array(1,2,3), 1.23D);
[2,3]
```
```SQL
spark-sql> select array_remove(array(1,2,3), 'foo');
NULL
```
We should safely coerce both left and right hand side expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in DataFrameFunctionsSuite
Closes#22542 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25519.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ArrayPosition, we currently cast the right hand side expression to match the element type of the left hand side Array. This may result in down casting and may return wrong result or questionable result.
Example :
```SQL
spark-sql> select array_position(array(1), 1.34);
1
```
```SQL
spark-sql> select array_position(array(1), 'foo');
null
```
We should safely coerce both left and right hand side expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in DataFrameFunctionsSuite
Closes#22407 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25416.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The function actually exists in current selected database, and it's failed to init during `lookupFunciton`, but the exception message is:
```
This function is neither a registered temporary function nor a permanent function registered in the database 'default'.
```
This is not conducive to positioning problems. This PR fix the problem.
## How was this patch tested?
new test case + manual tests
Closes#18544 from stanzhai/fix-udf-error-message.
Authored-by: Stan Zhai <mail@stanzhai.site>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `Locale.ROOT` when `toUpperCase`.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22531 from wangyum/SPARK-25415.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
One more legacy config to go ...
Closes#22515 from rxin/allowCreatingManagedTableUsingNonemptyLocation.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently there are two classes with the same naming BenchmarkBase:
1. `org.apache.spark.util.BenchmarkBase`
2. `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BenchmarkBase`
This is very confusing. And the benchmark object `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark` is using the one in `org.apache.spark.util.BenchmarkBase`, while there is another class `BenchmarkBase` in the same package of it...
Here I propose:
1. the package `org.apache.spark.util.BenchmarkBase` should be in test package of core module. Move it to package `org.apache.spark.benchmark` .
2. Move `org.apache.spark.util.Benchmark` to test package of core module. Move it to package `org.apache.spark.benchmark` .
3. Rename the class `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BenchmarkBase` as `BenchmarkWithCodegen`
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#22513 from gengliangwang/refactorBenchmarkBase.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR proposes to avoid usage of pattern matching for each call of ```eval``` method within:
- ```Concat```
- ```Reverse```
- ```ElementAt```
## How was this patch tested?
Run the existing tests for ```Concat```, ```Reverse``` and ```ElementAt``` expression classes.
Closes#22471 from mn-mikke/SPARK-25470.
Authored-by: Marek Novotny <mn.mikke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See title. Makes our legacy backward compatibility configs more consistent.
## How was this patch tested?
Make sure all references have been updated:
```
> git grep compareDateTimestampInTimestamp
docs/sql-programming-guide.md: - Since Spark 2.4, Spark compares a DATE type with a TIMESTAMP type after promotes both sides to TIMESTAMP. To set `false` to `spark.sql.legacy.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp` restores the previous behavior. This option will be removed in Spark 3.0.
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala: // if conf.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp is true
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala: => if (conf.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp) Some(TimestampType) else Some(StringType)
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala: => if (conf.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp) Some(TimestampType) else Some(StringType)
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala: buildConf("spark.sql.legacy.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp")
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala: def compareDateTimestampInTimestamp : Boolean = getConf(COMPARE_DATE_TIMESTAMP_IN_TIMESTAMP)
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala: "spark.sql.legacy.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp" -> convertToTS.toString) {
```
Closes#22508 from rxin/SPARK-23549.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
See above. This should go into the 2.4 release.
Closes#22509 from rxin/SPARK-25384.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 417ad92502.
We decided to keep the current behaviors unchanged and will consider whether we will deprecate the these functions in 3.0. For more details, see the discussion in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23715
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#22505 from gatorsmile/revertSpark-23715.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The problem was cause by the PushProjectThroughUnion rule, which, when creating new Project for each child of Union, uses the same exprId for expressions of the same position. This is wrong because, for each child of Union, the expressions are all independent, and it can lead to a wrong result if other rules like FoldablePropagation kicks in, taking two different expressions as the same.
This fix is to create new expressions in the new Project for each child of Union.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#22447 from maryannxue/push-project-thru-union-bug.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ArrayContains, we currently cast the right hand side expression to match the element type of the left hand side Array. This may result in down casting and may return wrong result or questionable result.
Example :
```SQL
spark-sql> select array_contains(array(1), 1.34);
true
```
```SQL
spark-sql> select array_contains(array(1), 'foo');
null
```
We should safely coerce both left and right hand side expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in DataFrameFunctionsSuite
Closes#22408 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25417.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This goes to revert sequential PRs based on some discussion and comments at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#issuecomment-422650759.
#22344#22330#22239#16677
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22481 from viirya/revert-SPARK-19355-1.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds an "optimizer" prefix to nested schema pruning.
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by existing tests.
Closes#22475 from rxin/SPARK-4502.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR proposes to return the data type of the operands as a result for the `div` operator. Before the PR, `bigint` is always returned. It introduces also a `spark.sql.legacy.integralDivide.returnBigint` config in order to let the users restore the legacy behavior.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Closes#22465 from mgaido91/SPARK-25457.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch changes the config option `spark.sql.streaming.noDataMicroBatchesEnabled` to `spark.sql.streaming.noDataMicroBatches.enabled` to be more consistent with rest of the configs. Unfortunately there is one streaming config called `spark.sql.streaming.metricsEnabled`. For that one we should just use a fallback config and change it in a separate patch.
## How was this patch tested?
Made sure no other references to this config are in the code base:
```
> git grep "noDataMicro"
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala: buildConf("spark.sql.streaming.noDataMicroBatches.enabled")
```
Closes#22476 from rxin/SPARK-24157.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-23711, `UnsafeProjection` supports fallback to an interpreted mode. Therefore, this pr fixed code to support the same fallback mode in `MutableProjection` based on `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite`.
Closes#22355 from maropu/SPARK-25358.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To be more consistent with other statistics based configs.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A - straightforward rename of config option. Used `git grep` to make sure there are no mention of it.
Closes#22457 from rxin/SPARK-24626.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`spark.sql.fromJsonForceNullableSchema` -> `spark.sql.function.fromJson.forceNullable`
## How was this patch tested?
Made sure there are no more references to `spark.sql.fromJsonForceNullableSchema`.
Closes#22459 from rxin/SPARK-23173.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-22333 introduced a regression in the resolution of `CURRENT_DATE` and `CURRENT_TIMESTAMP`. Before that ticket, these 2 functions were resolved in a case insensitive way. After, this depends on the value of `spark.sql.caseSensitive`.
The PR restores the previous behavior and makes their resolution case insensitive anyhow. The PR takes over #21217, therefore it closes#21217 and credit for this patch should be given to jamesthomp.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#22440 from mgaido91/SPARK-24151.
Lead-authored-by: James Thompson <jamesthomp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes `GenArrayData.genCodeToCreateArrayData` method simple by using `ArrayData.createArrayData` method.
Before this PR, `genCodeToCreateArrayData` method was complicated
* Generated a temporary Java array to create `ArrayData`
* Had separate code generation path to assign values for `GenericArrayData` and `UnsafeArrayData`
After this PR, the method
* Directly generates `GenericArrayData` or `UnsafeArrayData` without a temporary array
* Has only code generation path to assign values
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Closes#22439 from kiszk/SPARK-25444.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR takes over #14036 and it introduces a new expression `IntegralDivide` in order to avoid the several unneded cast added previously.
In order to prove the performance gain, the following benchmark has been run:
```
test("Benchmark IntegralDivide") {
val r = new scala.util.Random(91)
val nData = 1000000
val testDataInt = (1 to nData).map(_ => (r.nextInt(), r.nextInt()))
val testDataLong = (1 to nData).map(_ => (r.nextLong(), r.nextLong()))
val testDataShort = (1 to nData).map(_ => (r.nextInt().toShort, r.nextInt().toShort))
// old code
val oldExprsInt = testDataInt.map(x =>
Cast(Divide(Cast(Literal(x._1), DoubleType), Cast(Literal(x._2), DoubleType)), LongType))
val oldExprsLong = testDataLong.map(x =>
Cast(Divide(Cast(Literal(x._1), DoubleType), Cast(Literal(x._2), DoubleType)), LongType))
val oldExprsShort = testDataShort.map(x =>
Cast(Divide(Cast(Literal(x._1), DoubleType), Cast(Literal(x._2), DoubleType)), LongType))
// new code
val newExprsInt = testDataInt.map(x => IntegralDivide(x._1, x._2))
val newExprsLong = testDataLong.map(x => IntegralDivide(x._1, x._2))
val newExprsShort = testDataShort.map(x => IntegralDivide(x._1, x._2))
Seq(("Long", "old", oldExprsLong),
("Long", "new", newExprsLong),
("Int", "old", oldExprsInt),
("Int", "new", newExprsShort),
("Short", "old", oldExprsShort),
("Short", "new", oldExprsShort)).foreach { case (dt, t, ds) =>
val start = System.nanoTime()
ds.foreach(e => e.eval(EmptyRow))
val endNoCodegen = System.nanoTime()
println(s"Running $nData op with $t code on $dt (no-codegen): ${(endNoCodegen - start) / 1000000} ms")
}
}
```
The results on my laptop are:
```
Running 1000000 op with old code on Long (no-codegen): 600 ms
Running 1000000 op with new code on Long (no-codegen): 112 ms
Running 1000000 op with old code on Int (no-codegen): 560 ms
Running 1000000 op with new code on Int (no-codegen): 135 ms
Running 1000000 op with old code on Short (no-codegen): 317 ms
Running 1000000 op with new code on Short (no-codegen): 153 ms
```
Showing a 2-5X improvement. The benchmark doesn't include code generation as it is pretty hard to test the performance there as for such simple operations the most of the time is spent in the code generation/compilation process.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Closes#22395 from mgaido91/SPARK-16323.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some mistakes in examples of newly added functions. Also the format of the example results are not unified. We should fix them.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually executed the examples.
Closes#22437 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-25431/fix_examples_2.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the dev list, we can still discuss whether the next version is 2.5.0 or 3.0.0. Let us first bump the master branch version to `2.5.0-SNAPSHOT`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22426 from gatorsmile/bumpVersionMaster.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr removed the duplicate fallback logic in `UnsafeProjection`.
This pr comes from #22355.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite`.
Closes#22417 from maropu/SPARK-25426.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some mistakes in examples of newly added functions. Also the format of the example results are not unified. We should fix and unify them.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually executed the examples.
Closes#22421 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-25431/fix_examples.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In RuleExecutor, after applying a rule, if the plan has changed, the before and after plan will be logged using level "trace". At times, however, such information can be very helpful for debugging. Hence, making the log level configurable in SQLConf would allow users to turn on the plan change log independently and save the trouble of tweaking log4j settings. Meanwhile, filtering plan change log for specific rules can also be very useful.
So this PR adds two SQL configurations:
1. spark.sql.optimizer.planChangeLog.level - set a specific log level for logging plan changes after a rule is applied.
2. spark.sql.optimizer.planChangeLog.rules - enable plan change logging only for a set of specified rules, separated by commas.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#22406 from maryannxue/spark-25415.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the null handling in BooleanSimplification. In the rule BooleanSimplification, there are two cases that do not properly handle null values. The optimization is not right if either side is null. This PR is to fix them.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases
Closes#22390 from gatorsmile/fixBooleanSimplification.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Correct some comparisons between unrelated types to what they seem to… have been trying to do
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22384 from srowen/SPARK-25398.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-21281 introduced a check for the inputs of `CreateStructLike` to be non-empty. This means that `struct()`, which was previously considered valid, now throws an Exception. This behavior change was introduced in 2.3.0. The change may break users' application on upgrade and it causes `VectorAssembler` to fail when an empty `inputCols` is defined.
The PR removes the added check making `struct()` valid again.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#22373 from mgaido91/SPARK-25371.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the Planner, we collect the placeholder which need to be substituted in the query execution plan and once we plan them, we substitute the placeholder with the effective plan.
In this second phase, we rely on the `==` comparison, ie. the `equals` method. This means that if two placeholder plans - which are different instances - have the same attributes (so that they are equal, according to the equal method) they are both substituted with their corresponding new physical plans. So, in such a situation, the first time we substitute both them with the first of the 2 new generated plan and the second time we substitute nothing.
This is usually of no harm for the execution of the query itself, as the 2 plans are identical. But since they are the same instance, now, the local variables are shared (which is unexpected). This causes issues for the metrics collected, as the same node is executed 2 times, so the metrics are accumulated 2 times, wrongly.
The PR proposes to use the `eq` method in checking which placeholder needs to be substituted,; thus in the previous situation, actually both the two different physical nodes which are created (one for each time the logical plan appears in the query plan) are used and the metrics are collected properly for each of them.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#22284 from mgaido91/SPARK-25278.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add the version number for the new APIs.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22377 from gatorsmile/followup24849.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
How to reproduce:
```scala
val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq(
(1, 1)
)).toDF("a", "b").withColumn("c", lit(null).cast("int"))
val df2 = df1.union(df1).withColumn("d", spark_partition_id).filter($"c".isNotNull)
df2.show
+---+---+----+---+
| a| b| c| d|
+---+---+----+---+
| 1| 1|null| 0|
| 1| 1|null| 1|
+---+---+----+---+
```
`filter($"c".isNotNull)` was transformed to `(null <=> c#10)` before https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201, but it is transformed to `(c#10 = null)` since https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20155. This pr revert it to `(null <=> c#10)` to fix this issue.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Closes#22368 from wangyum/SPARK-25368.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When running TPC-DS benchmarks on 2.4 release, npoggi and winglungngai saw more than 10% performance regression on the following queries: q67, q24a and q24b. After we applying the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22338, the performance regression still exists. If we revert the changes in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222, npoggi and winglungngai found the performance regression was resolved. Thus, this PR is to revert the related changes for unblocking the 2.4 release.
In the future release, we still can continue the investigation and find out the root cause of the regression.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing test cases
Closes#22361 from gatorsmile/revertMemoryBlock.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add new optimization rule to eliminate unnecessary shuffling by flipping adjacent Window expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested with unit tests, integration tests, and manual tests.
Closes#17899 from ptkool/adjacent_window_optimization.
Authored-by: ptkool <michael.styles@shopify.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This took me a while to debug and find out. Looks we better at least leave a debug log that SQL text for a view will be used.
Here's how I got there:
**Hive:**
```
CREATE TABLE emp AS SELECT 'user' AS name, 'address' as address;
CREATE DATABASE d100;
CREATE FUNCTION d100.udf100 AS 'org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.udf.generic.GenericUDFUpper';
CREATE VIEW testview AS SELECT d100.udf100(name) FROM default.emp;
```
**Spark:**
```
sql("SELECT * FROM testview").show()
```
```
scala> sql("SELECT * FROM testview").show()
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Undefined function: 'd100.udf100'. This function is neither a registered temporary function nor a permanent function registered in the database 'default'.; line 1 pos 7
```
Under the hood, it actually makes sense since the view is defined as `SELECT d100.udf100(name) FROM default.emp;` and Hive API:
```
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Table.getViewExpandedText()
```
This returns a wrongly qualified SQL string for the view as below:
```
SELECT `d100.udf100`(`emp`.`name`) FROM `default`.`emp`
```
which works fine in Hive but not in Spark.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually:
```
18/09/06 19:32:48 DEBUG HiveSessionCatalog: 'SELECT `d100.udf100`(`emp`.`name`) FROM `default`.`emp`' will be used for the view(testview).
```
Closes#22351 from HyukjinKwon/minor-debug.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add test cases for fromString
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22345 from gatorsmile/addTest.
Authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #22200.
When casting to decimal type, if `Cast.canNullSafeCastToDecimal()`, overflow won't happen, so we don't need to check the result of `Decimal.changePrecision()`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22352 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-25208/reduce_code_size.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extended `to_json` and support any types as element types of input arrays. It should allow converting arrays of primitive types and arrays of arrays. For example:
```
select to_json(array('1','2','3'))
> ["1","2","3"]
select to_json(array(array(1,2,3),array(4)))
> [[1,2,3],[4]]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a couple sql tests for arrays of primitive type and of arrays. Also I added round trip test `from_json` -> `to_json`.
Closes#22226 from MaxGekk/to_json-array.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I made one pass over barrier APIs added to Spark 2.4 and updates some scopes and docs. I will update Python docs once Scala doc was reviewed.
One major issue is that `BarrierTaskContext` implements `TaskContextImpl` that exposes some public methods. And internally there were several direct references to `TaskContextImpl` methods instead of `TaskContext`. This PR moved some methods from `TaskContextImpl` to `TaskContext`, remaining package private, and used delegate methods to avoid inheriting `TaskContextImp` and exposing unnecessary APIs.
TODOs:
- [x] scala doc
- [x] python doc (#22261 ).
Closes#22240 from mengxr/SPARK-25248.
Authored-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR integrates handling of `UnsafeArrayData` and `GenericArrayData` into one. The current `CodeGenerator.createUnsafeArray` handles only allocation of `UnsafeArrayData`.
This PR introduces a new method `createArrayData` that returns a code to allocate `UnsafeArrayData` or `GenericArrayData` and to assign a value into the allocated array.
This PR also reduce the size of generated code by calling a runtime helper.
This PR replaced `createArrayData` with `createUnsafeArray`. This PR also refactor `ArraySetLike` that can be used for `ArrayDistinct`, too.
This PR also refactors`ArrayDistinct` to use `ArraryBuilder`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#21912 from kiszk/SPARK-24962.
Lead-authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes a problem that `ArraysOverlap` function throws a `CompilationException` with non-nullable array type.
The following is the stack trace of the original problem:
```
Code generation of arrays_overlap([1,2,3], [4,5,3]) failed:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 56, Column 11: failed to compile: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 56, Column 11: Expression "isNull_0" is not an rvalue
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 56, Column 11: failed to compile: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 56, Column 11: Expression "isNull_0" is not an rvalue
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture$Sync.getValue(AbstractFuture.java:306)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture$Sync.get(AbstractFuture.java:293)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture.get(AbstractFuture.java:116)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.Uninterruptibles.getUninterruptibly(Uninterruptibles.java:135)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.getAndRecordStats(LocalCache.java:2410)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.loadSync(LocalCache.java:2380)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.lockedGetOrLoad(LocalCache.java:2342)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.get(LocalCache.java:2257)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.get(LocalCache.java:4000)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.getOrLoad(LocalCache.java:4004)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$LocalLoadingCache.get(LocalCache.java:4874)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodeGenerator$.compile(CodeGenerator.scala:1305)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateMutableProjection$.create(GenerateMutableProjection.scala:143)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateMutableProjection$.create(GenerateMutableProjection.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateMutableProjection$.create(GenerateMutableProjection.scala:32)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodeGenerator.generate(CodeGenerator.scala:1260)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test in `CollectionExpressionSuite`.
Closes#22317 from kiszk/SPARK-25310.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Invoking ArrayContains function with non nullable array type throws the following error in the code generation phase. Below is the error snippet.
```SQL
Code generation of array_contains([1,2,3], 1) failed:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 40, Column 11: failed to compile: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 40, Column 11: Expression "isNull_0" is not an rvalue
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 40, Column 11: failed to compile: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 40, Column 11: Expression "isNull_0" is not an rvalue
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture$Sync.getValue(AbstractFuture.java:306)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture$Sync.get(AbstractFuture.java:293)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture.get(AbstractFuture.java:116)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.Uninterruptibles.getUninterruptibly(Uninterruptibles.java:135)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.getAndRecordStats(LocalCache.java:2410)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.loadSync(LocalCache.java:2380)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.lockedGetOrLoad(LocalCache.java:2342)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.get(LocalCache.java:2257)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.get(LocalCache.java:4000)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.getOrLoad(LocalCache.java:4004)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$LocalLoadingCache.get(LocalCache.java:4874)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodeGenerator$.compile(CodeGenerator.scala:1305)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test in CollectionExpressionSuite.
Closes#22315 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25308.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR works for one of TODOs in `GenerateUnsafeProjection` "if the nullability of field is correct, we can use it to save null check" to simplify generated code.
When `nullable=false` in `DataType`, `GenerateUnsafeProjection` removed code for null checks in the generated Java code.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `GenerateUnsafeProjectionSuite`
Closes#20637 from kiszk/SPARK-23466.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is an follow-up PR of #21087 based on [a discussion thread](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21087#discussion_r211080067]. Since #21087 changed a condition of `if` statement, the message in an exception is not consistent of the current behavior.
This PR updates the exception message.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Closes#22269 from kiszk/SPARK-23997-followup.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Alternative take on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22063 that does not introduce udfInternal.
Resolve issue with inferring func types in 2.12 by instead using info captured when UDF is registered -- capturing which types are nullable (i.e. not primitive)
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22259 from srowen/SPARK-25044.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Most of `HigherOrderFunction`s have the same `nullable` definition, ie. they are nullable when one of their arguments is nullable. The PR refactors it in order to avoid code duplication.
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Closes#22243 from mgaido91/MINOR_nullable_hof.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support Filter in ConvertToLocalRelation, similar to how Project works.
Additionally, in Optimizer, run ConvertToLocalRelation earlier to simplify the plan. This is good for very short queries which often are queries on local relations.
## How was this patch tested?
New test. Manual benchmark.
Author: Bogdan Raducanu <bogdan@databricks.com>
Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Author: Yinan Li <ynli@google.com>
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Author: s71955 <sujithchacko.2010@gmail.com>
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Author: jaroslav chládek <mastermism@gmail.com>
Author: Huangweizhe <huangweizhe@bbdservice.com>
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Author: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Author: Adam Bradbury <abradbury@users.noreply.github.com>
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#22205 from bogdanrdc/local-relation-filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements the possibility of the user to override the maximum number of buckets when saving to a table.
Currently the limit is a hard-coded 100k, which might be insufficient for large workloads.
A new configuration entry is proposed: `spark.sql.bucketing.maxBuckets`, which defaults to the previous 100k.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests in the following spark.sql test suites:
- CreateTableAsSelectSuite
- BucketedWriteSuite
Author: Fernando Pereira <fernando.pereira@epfl.ch>
Closes#21087 from ferdonline/enh/configurable_bucket_limit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
this pr add a configuration parameter to configure the capacity of fast aggregation.
Performance comparison:
```
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_60-b27 on Windows 7 6.1
Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3, GenuineIntel
Aggregate w multiple keys: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fasthash = default 5612 / 5882 3.7 267.6 1.0X
fasthash = config 3586 / 3595 5.8 171.0 1.6X
```
## How was this patch tested?
the existed test cases.
Closes#21931 from heary-cao/FastHashCapacity.
Authored-by: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update to janino 3.0.9 to address Java 8 + Scala 2.12 incompatibility. The error manifests as test failures like this in `ExpressionEncoderSuite`:
```
- encode/decode for seq of string: List(abc, xyz) *** FAILED ***
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error while encoding: org.codehaus.janino.InternalCompilerException: failed to compile: org.codehaus.janino.InternalCompilerException: Compiling "GeneratedClass": Two non-abstract methods "public int scala.collection.TraversableOnce.size()" have the same parameter types, declaring type and return type
```
It comes up pretty immediately in any generated code that references Scala collections, and virtually always concerning the `size()` method.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#22203 from srowen/SPARK-25029.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
(Link to Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4502)
_N.B. This is a restart of PR #16578 which includes a subset of that code. Relevant review comments from that PR should be considered incorporated by reference. Please avoid duplication in review by reviewing that PR first. The summary below is an edited copy of the summary of the previous PR._
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
One of the hallmarks of a column-oriented data storage format is the ability to read data from a subset of columns, efficiently skipping reads from other columns. Spark has long had support for pruning unneeded top-level schema fields from the scan of a parquet file. For example, consider a table, `contacts`, backed by parquet with the following Spark SQL schema:
```
root
|-- name: struct
| |-- first: string
| |-- last: string
|-- address: string
```
Parquet stores this table's data in three physical columns: `name.first`, `name.last` and `address`. To answer the query
```SQL
select address from contacts
```
Spark will read only from the `address` column of parquet data. However, to answer the query
```SQL
select name.first from contacts
```
Spark will read `name.first` and `name.last` from parquet.
This PR modifies Spark SQL to support a finer-grain of schema pruning. With this patch, Spark reads only the `name.first` column to answer the previous query.
### Implementation
There are two main components of this patch. First, there is a `ParquetSchemaPruning` optimizer rule for gathering the required schema fields of a `PhysicalOperation` over a parquet file, constructing a new schema based on those required fields and rewriting the plan in terms of that pruned schema. The pruned schema fields are pushed down to the parquet requested read schema. `ParquetSchemaPruning` uses a new `ProjectionOverSchema` extractor for rewriting a catalyst expression in terms of a pruned schema.
Second, the `ParquetRowConverter` has been patched to ensure the ordinals of the parquet columns read are correct for the pruned schema. `ParquetReadSupport` has been patched to address a compatibility mismatch between Spark's built in vectorized reader and the parquet-mr library's reader.
### Limitation
Among the complex Spark SQL data types, this patch supports parquet column pruning of nested sequences of struct fields only.
## How was this patch tested?
Care has been taken to ensure correctness and prevent regressions. A more advanced version of this patch incorporating optimizations for rewriting queries involving aggregations and joins has been running on a production Spark cluster at VideoAmp for several years. In that time, one bug was found and fixed early on, and we added a regression test for that bug.
We forward-ported this patch to Spark master in June 2016 and have been running this patch against Spark 2.x branches on ad-hoc clusters since then.
Closes#21320 from mallman/spark-4502-parquet_column_pruning-foundation.
Lead-authored-by: Michael Allman <msa@allman.ms>
Co-authored-by: Adam Jacques <adam@technowizardry.net>
Co-authored-by: Michael Allman <michael@videoamp.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Casting to `DecimalType` is not always needed to force nullable.
If the decimal type to cast is wider than original type, or only truncating or precision loss, the casted value won't be `null`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added and modified tests.
Closes#22200 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-25208/cast_nullable_decimal.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #22031 which added `zip_with` function to fix an example.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22194 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23932/fix_examples.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR moves the compilation of the regexp for code formatting outside the method which is called for each code block when splitting expressions, in order to avoid recompiling the regexp every time.
Credit should be given to Izek Greenfield.
## How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Closes#22135 from mgaido91/SPARK-25093.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fixes a perf regression caused by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21376 .
We should not use `RDD#toLocalIterator`, which triggers one Spark job per RDD partition. This is very bad for RDDs with a lot of small partitions.
To fix it, this PR introduces a way to access SQLConf in the scheduler event loop thread, so that we don't need to use `RDD#toLocalIterator` anymore in `JsonInferSchema`.
## How was this patch tested?
a new test
Closes#22152 from cloud-fan/conf.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to fix bugs when expr codegen fails; we need to catch `java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException` instead of `InternalCompilerException` and `CompileException` . This handling is the same with the `WholeStageCodegenExec ` one: 60af2501e1/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala (L585)
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite`
Closes#22154 from maropu/SPARK-25140.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24924, the data source provider com.databricks.spark.avro is mapped to the new package org.apache.spark.sql.avro .
As per the discussion in the [Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24924) and PR #22119, we should make the mapping configurable.
This PR also improve the error message when data source of Avro/Kafka is not found.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#22133 from gengliangwang/configurable_avro_mapping.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes a new flag option for stateful aggregation: remove redundant key data from value.
Enabling new option runs similar with current, and uses less memory for state according to key/value fields of state operator.
Please refer below link to see detailed perf. test result:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24763?focusedCommentId=16536539&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16536539
Since the state between enabling the option and disabling the option is not compatible, the option is set to 'disable' by default (to ensure backward compatibility), and OffsetSeqMetadata would prevent modifying the option after executing query.
## How was this patch tested?
Modify unit tests to cover both disabling option and enabling option.
Also did manual tests to see whether propose patch improves state memory usage.
Closes#21733 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24763.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22079#discussion_r209705612 It is possible for two objects to be unequal and yet we consider them as equal with this code, if the long values are separated by Int.MaxValue.
This PR fixes the issue.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new test cases in `RecordBinaryComparatorSuite`.
Closes#22101 from jiangxb1987/fix-rbc.
Authored-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR for supporting logical timestamp types https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21935, a SQL configuration spark.sql.avro.outputTimestampType is added, so that user can specify the output timestamp precision they want.
With PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21847, the output file can be written with user specified types.
So there is no need to have such trivial configuration. Otherwise to make it consistent we need to add configuration for all the Catalyst types that can be converted into different Avro types.
This PR also add a test case for user specified output schema with different timestamp types.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#22151 from gengliangwang/removeOutputTimestampType.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should also check `HigherOrderFunction.bind` method passes expected parameters.
This pr modifies tests for higher-order functions to check `bind` method.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified tests.
Closes#22131 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-25141/bind_test.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to skip invoking of the CSV/JSON parser per each line in the case if the required schema is empty. Added benchmarks for `count()` shows performance improvement up to **3.5 times**.
Before:
```
Count a dataset with 10 columns: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON count() 7676 / 7715 1.3 767.6
CSV count() 3309 / 3363 3.0 330.9
```
After:
```
Count a dataset with 10 columns: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON count() 2104 / 2156 4.8 210.4
CSV count() 2332 / 2386 4.3 233.2
```
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `CSVSuite` and `JSONSuite` as well as on added benchmarks.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#21909 from MaxGekk/empty-schema-optimization.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Put annotation args in one line, or API doc generation will fail.
~~~
[error] /Users/meng/src/spark/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala:1559: annotation argument needs to be a constant; found: "_FUNC_(expr) - Returns the character length of string data or number of bytes of ".+("binary data. The length of string data includes the trailing spaces. The length of binary ").+("data includes binary zeros.")
[error] "binary data. The length of string data includes the trailing spaces. The length of binary " +
[error] ^
[info] No documentation generated with unsuccessful compiler run
[error] one error found
[error] (catalyst/compile:doc) Scaladoc generation failed
[error] Total time: 27 s, completed Aug 17, 2018 3:20:08 PM
~~~
## How was this patch tested?
sbt catalyst/compile:doc passed
Closes#22137 from mengxr/minor-doc-fix.
Authored-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #22017 which added `map_zip_with` function.
In the test, when creating a lambda function, we use the `valueContainsNull` values for the nullabilities of the value arguments, but we should've used `true` as the same as `bind` method because the values might be `null` if the keys don't match.
## How was this patch tested?
Added small tests and existing tests.
Closes#22126 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23938/fix_tests.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The method ```*supportEquals``` determining whether elements of a data type could be used as items in a hash set or as keys in a hash map is duplicated across multiple collection and higher-order functions.
This PR suggests to deduplicate the method.
## How was this patch tested?
Run tests in:
- DataFrameFunctionsSuite
- CollectionExpressionsSuite
- HigherOrderExpressionsSuite
Closes#22110 from mn-mikke/SPARK-25122.
Authored-by: Marek Novotny <mn.mikke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr adds `transform_values` function which applies the function to each entry of the map and transforms the values.
```javascript
> SELECT transform_values(map(array(1, 2, 3), array(1, 2, 3)), (k,v) -> v + 1);
map(1->2, 2->3, 3->4)
> SELECT transform_values(map(array(1, 2, 3), array(1, 2, 3)), (k,v) -> k + v);
map(1->2, 2->4, 3->6)
```
## How was this patch tested?
New Tests added to
`DataFrameFunctionsSuite`
`HigherOrderFunctionsSuite`
`SQLQueryTestSuite`
Closes#22045 from codeatri/SPARK-23940.
Authored-by: codeatri <nehapatil6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery in the list of nonExcludableRules since its used to transform correlated scalar subqueries to joins.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test in OptimizerRuleExclusionSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#22108 from dilipbiswal/scalar_exclusion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Merges the two given arrays, element-wise, into a single array using function. If one array is shorter, nulls are appended at the end to match the length of the longer array, before applying function:
```
SELECT zip_with(ARRAY[1, 3, 5], ARRAY['a', 'b', 'c'], (x, y) -> (y, x)); -- [ROW('a', 1), ROW('b', 3), ROW('c', 5)]
SELECT zip_with(ARRAY[1, 2], ARRAY[3, 4], (x, y) -> x + y); -- [4, 6]
SELECT zip_with(ARRAY['a', 'b', 'c'], ARRAY['d', 'e', 'f'], (x, y) -> concat(x, y)); -- ['ad', 'be', 'cf']
SELECT zip_with(ARRAY['a'], ARRAY['d', null, 'f'], (x, y) -> coalesce(x, y)); -- ['a', null, 'f']
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests
Closes#22031 from techaddict/SPARK-23932.
Authored-by: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr adds transform_keys function which applies the function to each entry of the map and transforms the keys.
```javascript
> SELECT transform_keys(map(array(1, 2, 3), array(1, 2, 3)), (k,v) -> k + 1);
map(2->1, 3->2, 4->3)
> SELECT transform_keys(map(array(1, 2, 3), array(1, 2, 3)), (k,v) -> k + v);
map(2->1, 4->2, 6->3)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#22013 from codeatri/SPARK-23939.
Authored-by: codeatri <nehapatil6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is split from #21520. This includes changes of `BoundAttribute` and `Cast`.
This patch also adds few convenient APIs:
```scala
CodeGenerator.freshVariable(name: String, dt: DataType): VariableValue
CodeGenerator.freshVariable(name: String, javaClass: Class[_]): VariableValue
JavaCode.javaType(javaClass: Class[_]): Inline
JavaCode.javaType(dataType: DataType): Inline
JavaCode.boxedType(dataType: DataType): Inline
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#21537 from viirya/SPARK-24505-1.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
