Commit graph

6472 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marco Gaido e7bbca8896 [SPARK-23602][SQL] PrintToStderr prints value also in interpreted mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`PrintToStderr` was doing what is it supposed to only when code generation is enabled.
The PR adds the same behavior in interpreted mode too.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20773 from mgaido91/SPARK-23602.
2018-03-08 22:02:28 +01:00
Marco Gaido ea480990e7 [SPARK-23628][SQL] calculateParamLength should not return 1 + num of epressions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There was a bug in `calculateParamLength` which caused it to return always 1 + the number of expressions. This could lead to Exceptions especially with expressions of type long.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT + fixed previous UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20772 from mgaido91/SPARK-23628.
2018-03-08 11:09:15 -08:00
Marco Gaido 92e7ecbbbd [SPARK-23592][SQL] Add interpreted execution to DecodeUsingSerializer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds interpreted execution to DecodeUsingSerializer.

## How was this patch tested?
added UT

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20760 from mgaido91/SPARK-23592.
2018-03-08 14:18:14 +01:00
Li Jin 2cb23a8f51 [SPARK-23011][SQL][PYTHON] Support alternative function form with group aggregate pandas UDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to support an alternative function from with group aggregate pandas UDF.

The current form:
```
def foo(pdf):
    return ...
```
Takes a single arg that is a pandas DataFrame.

With this PR, an alternative form is supported:
```
def foo(key, pdf):
    return ...
```
The alternative form takes two argument - a tuple that presents the grouping key, and a pandas DataFrame represents the data.

## How was this patch tested?

GroupbyApplyTests

Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>

Closes #20295 from icexelloss/SPARK-23011-groupby-apply-key.
2018-03-08 20:29:07 +09:00
hyukjinkwon d6632d185e [SPARK-23380][PYTHON] Adds a conf for Arrow fallback in toPandas/createDataFrame with Pandas DataFrame
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR adds a configuration to control the fallback of Arrow optimization for `toPandas` and `createDataFrame` with Pandas DataFrame.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested and unit tests added.

You can test this by:

**`createDataFrame`**

```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", False)
pdf = spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", True)
spark.createDataFrame(pdf, "a: map<string, int>")
```

```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", False)
pdf = spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", False)
spark.createDataFrame(pdf, "a: map<string, int>")
```

**`toPandas`**

```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", True)
spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
```

```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", False)
spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
```

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20678 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23380-conf.
2018-03-08 20:22:07 +09:00
Xingbo Jiang ac76eff6a8 [SPARK-23525][SQL] Support ALTER TABLE CHANGE COLUMN COMMENT for external hive table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The following query doesn't work as expected:
```
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ext_table(a STRING, b INT, c STRING) PARTITIONED BY (d STRING)
LOCATION 'sql/core/spark-warehouse/ext_table';
ALTER TABLE ext_table CHANGE a a STRING COMMENT "new comment";
DESC ext_table;
```
The comment of column `a` is not updated, that's because `HiveExternalCatalog.doAlterTable` ignores table schema changes. To fix the issue, we should call `doAlterTableDataSchema` instead of `doAlterTable`.

## How was this patch tested?

Updated `DDLSuite.testChangeColumn`.

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20696 from jiangxb1987/alterColumnComment.
2018-03-07 13:51:44 -08:00
Marcelo Vanzin c99fc9ad9b [SPARK-23550][CORE] Cleanup Utils.
A few different things going on:
- Remove unused methods.
- Move JSON methods to the only class that uses them.
- Move test-only methods to TestUtils.
- Make getMaxResultSize() a config constant.
- Reuse functionality from existing libraries (JRE or JavaUtils) where possible.

The change also includes changes to a few tests to call `Utils.createTempFile` correctly,
so that temp dirs are created under the designated top-level temp dir instead of
potentially polluting git index.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #20706 from vanzin/SPARK-23550.
2018-03-07 13:42:06 -08:00
Marco Gaido aff7d81cb7 [SPARK-23591][SQL] Add interpreted execution to EncodeUsingSerializer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds interpreted execution to EncodeUsingSerializer.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20751 from mgaido91/SPARK-23591.
2018-03-07 18:31:59 +01:00
Takeshi Yamamuro 33c2cb22b3 [SPARK-23611][SQL] Add a helper function to check exception for expr evaluation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a helper function in `ExpressionEvalHelper` to check exceptions in all the path of expression evaluation.

## How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing tests.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20748 from maropu/SPARK-23611.
2018-03-07 13:10:51 +01:00
Marco Gaido 4c587eb488 [SPARK-23590][SQL] Add interpreted execution to CreateExternalRow
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds interpreted execution to CreateExternalRow

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20749 from mgaido91/SPARK-23590.
2018-03-06 17:42:17 +01:00
Takeshi Yamamuro e8a259d66d [SPARK-23594][SQL] GetExternalRowField should support interpreted execution
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `GetExternalRowField`.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.

Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>

Closes #20746 from maropu/SPARK-23594.
2018-03-06 13:55:13 +01:00
Wenchen Fan ad640a5aff [SPARK-23303][SQL] improve the explain result for data source v2 relations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The proposed explain format:
**[streaming header] [RelationV2/ScanV2] [data source name] [output] [pushed filters] [options]**

**streaming header**: if it's a streaming relation, put a "Streaming" at the beginning.
**RelationV2/ScanV2**: if it's a logical plan, put a "RelationV2", else, put a "ScanV2"
**data source name**: the simple class name of the data source implementation
**output**: a string of the plan output attributes
**pushed filters**: a string of all the filters that have been pushed to this data source
**options**: all the options to create the data source reader.

The current explain result for data source v2 relation is unreadable:
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Filter ('i > 6)
+- AnalysisBarrier
      +- Project [j#1]
         +- DataSourceV2Relation [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
j: int
Project [j#1]
+- Filter (i#0 > 6)
   +- Project [j#1, i#0]
      +- DataSourceV2Relation [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [j#1]
+- Filter isnotnull(i#0)
   +- DataSourceV2Relation [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [j#1]
+- *(1) Filter isnotnull(i#0)
   +- *(1) DataSourceV2Scan [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940
```

after this PR
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('j, None)]
+- AnalysisBarrier
      +- RelationV2 AdvancedDataSourceV2[i#0, j#1]

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
j: int
Project [j#1]
+- RelationV2 AdvancedDataSourceV2[i#0, j#1]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
RelationV2 AdvancedDataSourceV2[j#1]

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) ScanV2 AdvancedDataSourceV2[j#1]
```
-------
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
i: int, j: int
Filter (i#88 > 3)
+- RelationV2 JavaAdvancedDataSourceV2[i#88, j#89]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter isnotnull(i#88)
+- RelationV2 JavaAdvancedDataSourceV2[i#88, j#89] (Pushed Filters: [GreaterThan(i,3)])

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Filter isnotnull(i#88)
+- *(1) ScanV2 JavaAdvancedDataSourceV2[i#88, j#89] (Pushed Filters: [GreaterThan(i,3)])
```

an example for streaming query
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
Aggregate [value#6], [value#6, count(1) AS count(1)#11L]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
   +- MapElements <function1>, class java.lang.String, [StructField(value,StringType,true)], obj#5: java.lang.String
      +- DeserializeToObject cast(value#25 as string).toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
         +- Streaming RelationV2 MemoryStreamDataSource[value#25]

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: string, count(1): bigint
Aggregate [value#6], [value#6, count(1) AS count(1)#11L]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
   +- MapElements <function1>, class java.lang.String, [StructField(value,StringType,true)], obj#5: java.lang.String
      +- DeserializeToObject cast(value#25 as string).toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
         +- Streaming RelationV2 MemoryStreamDataSource[value#25]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Aggregate [value#6], [value#6, count(1) AS count(1)#11L]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
   +- MapElements <function1>, class java.lang.String, [StructField(value,StringType,true)], obj#5: java.lang.String
      +- DeserializeToObject value#25.toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
         +- Streaming RelationV2 MemoryStreamDataSource[value#25]

== Physical Plan ==
*(4) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[count(1)], output=[value#6, count(1)#11L])
+- StateStoreSave [value#6], state info [ checkpoint = *********(redacted)/cloud/dev/spark/target/tmp/temporary-549f264b-2531-4fcb-a52f-433c77347c12/state, runId = f84d9da9-2f8c-45c1-9ea1-70791be684de, opId = 0, ver = 0, numPartitions = 5], Complete, 0
   +- *(3) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[merge_count(1)], output=[value#6, count#16L])
      +- StateStoreRestore [value#6], state info [ checkpoint = *********(redacted)/cloud/dev/spark/target/tmp/temporary-549f264b-2531-4fcb-a52f-433c77347c12/state, runId = f84d9da9-2f8c-45c1-9ea1-70791be684de, opId = 0, ver = 0, numPartitions = 5]
         +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[merge_count(1)], output=[value#6, count#16L])
            +- Exchange hashpartitioning(value#6, 5)
               +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[partial_count(1)], output=[value#6, count#16L])
                  +- *(1) SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
                     +- *(1) MapElements <function1>, obj#5: java.lang.String
                        +- *(1) DeserializeToObject value#25.toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
                           +- *(1) ScanV2 MemoryStreamDataSource[value#25]
```
## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20647 from cloud-fan/explain.
2018-03-05 20:35:14 -08:00
Henry Robinson 8c5b34c425 [SPARK-23604][SQL] Change Statistics.isEmpty to !Statistics.hasNonNul…
…lValue

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Parquet 1.9 will change the semantics of Statistics.isEmpty slightly
to reflect if the null value count has been set. That breaks a
timestamp interoperability test that cares only about whether there
are column values present in the statistics of a written file for an
INT96 column. Fix by using Statistics.hasNonNullValue instead.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests continue to pass against Parquet 1.8, and also pass against
a Parquet build including PARQUET-1217.

Author: Henry Robinson <henry@cloudera.com>

Closes #20740 from henryr/spark-23604.
2018-03-05 16:49:24 -08:00
Marco Gaido f6b49f9d1b [SPARK-23586][SQL] Add interpreted execution to WrapOption
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds interpreted execution to WrapOption.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20741 from mgaido91/SPARK-23586_2.
2018-03-06 01:37:51 +01:00
Jose Torres b0f422c386 [SPARK-23559][SS] Add epoch ID to DataWriterFactory.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add an epoch ID argument to DataWriterFactory for use in streaming. As a side effect of passing in this value, DataWriter will now have a consistent lifecycle; commit() or abort() ends the lifecycle of a DataWriter instance in any execution mode.

I considered making a separate streaming interface and adding the epoch ID only to that one, but I think it requires a lot of extra work for no real gain. I think it makes sense to define epoch 0 as the one and only epoch of a non-streaming query.

## How was this patch tested?

existing unit tests

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20710 from jose-torres/api2.
2018-03-05 13:23:01 -08:00
Marco Gaido ba622f45ca [SPARK-23585][SQL] Add interpreted execution to UnwrapOption
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds interpreted execution to UnwrapOption.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20736 from mgaido91/SPARK-23586.
2018-03-05 20:43:03 +01:00
Mihaly Toth a366b950b9 [SPARK-23329][SQL] Fix documentation of trigonometric functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Provide more details in trigonometric function documentations. Referenced `java.lang.Math` for further details in the descriptions.
## How was this patch tested?

Ran full build, checked generated documentation manually

Author: Mihaly Toth <misutoth@gmail.com>

Closes #20618 from misutoth/trigonometric-doc.
2018-03-05 23:46:40 +09:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 2ce37b50fc [SPARK-23546][SQL] Refactor stateless methods/values in CodegenContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

A current `CodegenContext` class has immutable value or method without mutable state, too.
This refactoring moves them to `CodeGenerator` object class which can be accessed from anywhere without an instantiated `CodegenContext` in the program.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #20700 from kiszk/SPARK-23546.
2018-03-05 11:39:01 +01:00
Eric Liang a89cdf55fa [SQL][MINOR] XPathDouble prettyPrint should say 'double' not 'float'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It looks like this was incorrectly copied from `XPathFloat` in the class above.

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Eric Liang <ekhliang@gmail.com>

Closes #20730 from ericl/fix-typo-xpath.
2018-03-05 07:32:24 +09:00
Juliusz Sompolski dea381dfaa [SPARK-23514][FOLLOW-UP] Remove more places using sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration directly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20679 I missed a few places in SQL tests.
For hygiene, they should also use the sessionState interface where possible.

## How was this patch tested?

Modified existing tests.

Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>

Closes #20718 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-23514-followup.
2018-03-03 09:10:48 +08:00
gatorsmile 487377e693 [SPARK-23570][SQL] Add Spark 2.3.0 in HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Spark 2.3.0 in HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite since Spark 2.3.0 is released for ensuring backward compatibility.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20720 from gatorsmile/add2.3.
2018-03-02 14:30:37 -08:00
jerryshao 707e6506d0 [SPARK-23097][SQL][SS] Migrate text socket source to V2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR moves structured streaming text socket source to V2.

Questions: do we need to remove old "socket" source?

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test and manual verification.

Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>

Closes #20382 from jerryshao/SPARK-23097.
2018-03-02 12:27:42 -08:00
Feng Liu 3a4d15e5d2 [SPARK-23518][SQL] Avoid metastore access when the users only want to read and write data frames
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944 added one patch, which allowed a spark session to be created when the hive metastore server is down. However, it did not allow running any commands with the spark session. This brings troubles to the user who only wants to read / write data frames without metastore setup.

## How was this patch tested?

Added some unit tests to read and write data frames based on the original HiveMetastoreLazyInitializationSuite.

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>

Closes #20681 from liufengdb/completely-lazy.
2018-03-02 10:38:50 -08:00
KaiXinXiaoLei cdcccd7b41 [SPARK-23405] Generate additional constraints for Join's children
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
I run a sql: `select ls.cs_order_number from ls left semi join catalog_sales cs on ls.cs_order_number = cs.cs_order_number`, The `ls` table is a small table ,and the number is one. The `catalog_sales` table is a big table,  and the number is 10 billion. The task will be hang up. And i find the many null values of `cs_order_number` in the `catalog_sales` table. I think the null value should be removed in the logical plan.

>== Optimized Logical Plan ==
>Join LeftSemi, (cs_order_number#1 = cs_order_number#22)
>:- Project cs_order_number#1
>   : +- Filter isnotnull(cs_order_number#1)
>      : +- MetastoreRelation 100t, ls
>+- Project cs_order_number#22
>   +- MetastoreRelation 100t, catalog_sales

Now, use this patch, the plan will be:
>== Optimized Logical Plan ==
>Join LeftSemi, (cs_order_number#1 = cs_order_number#22)
>:- Project cs_order_number#1
>   : +- Filter isnotnull(cs_order_number#1)
>      : +- MetastoreRelation 100t, ls
>+- Project cs_order_number#22
>   : **+- Filter isnotnull(cs_order_number#22)**
>     :+- MetastoreRelation 100t, catalog_sales

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: KaiXinXiaoLei <584620569@qq.com>
Author: hanghang <584620569@qq.com>

Closes #20670 from KaiXinXiaoLei/Spark-23405.
2018-03-02 00:09:44 +08:00
Yuming Wang ff1480189b [SPARK-23510][SQL] Support Hive 2.2 and Hive 2.3 metastore
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is based on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20668 for supporting Hive 2.2 and Hive 2.3 metastore.

When we merge the PR, we should give the major credit to wangyum

## How was this patch tested?
Added the test cases

Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20671 from gatorsmile/pr-20668.
2018-03-01 16:26:11 +08:00
Xingbo Jiang 25c2776dd9 [SPARK-23523][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Minor refactor of OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Inside `OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery.getPartitionAttrs`, avoid using `zip` to generate attribute map.
Also include other minor update of comments and format.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing test cases.

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20693 from jiangxb1987/SPARK-23523.
2018-02-28 12:16:26 -08:00
Juliusz Sompolski 476a7f026b [SPARK-23514] Use SessionState.newHadoopConf() to propage hadoop configs set in SQLConf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

A few places in `spark-sql` were using `sc.hadoopConfiguration` directly. They should be using `sessionState.newHadoopConf()` to blend in configs that were set through `SQLConf`.

Also, for better UX, for these configs blended in from `SQLConf`, we should consider removing the `spark.hadoop` prefix, so that the settings are recognized whether or not they were specified by the user.

## How was this patch tested?

Tested that AlterTableRecoverPartitions now correctly recognizes settings that are passed in to the FileSystem through SQLConf.

Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>

Closes #20679 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-23514.
2018-02-28 08:44:53 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh b14993e1fc [SPARK-23448][SQL] Clarify JSON and CSV parser behavior in document
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Clarify JSON and CSV reader behavior in document.

JSON doesn't support partial results for corrupted records.
CSV only supports partial results for the records with more or less tokens.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass existing tests.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #20666 from viirya/SPARK-23448-2.
2018-02-28 11:00:54 +09:00
gatorsmile 414ee867ba [SPARK-23523][SQL] Fix the incorrect result caused by the rule OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```Scala
val tablePath = new File(s"${path.getCanonicalPath}/cOl3=c/cOl1=a/cOl5=e")
 Seq(("a", "b", "c", "d", "e")).toDF("cOl1", "cOl2", "cOl3", "cOl4", "cOl5")
 .write.json(tablePath.getCanonicalPath)
 val df = spark.read.json(path.getCanonicalPath).select("CoL1", "CoL5", "CoL3").distinct()
 df.show()
```

It generates a wrong result.
```
[c,e,a]
```

We have a bug in the rule `OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery `. We should respect the attribute order in the original leaf node. This PR is to fix it.

## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20684 from gatorsmile/optimizeMetadataOnly.
2018-02-27 08:44:25 -08:00
Juliusz Sompolski 8077bb04f3 [SPARK-23445] ColumnStat refactoring
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Refactor ColumnStat to be more flexible.

* Split `ColumnStat` and `CatalogColumnStat` just like `CatalogStatistics` is split from `Statistics`. This detaches how the statistics are stored from how they are processed in the query plan. `CatalogColumnStat` keeps `min` and `max` as `String`, making it not depend on dataType information.
* For `CatalogColumnStat`, parse column names from property names in the metastore (`KEY_VERSION` property), not from metastore schema. This means that `CatalogColumnStat`s can be created for columns even if the schema itself is not stored in the metastore.
* Make all fields optional. `min`, `max` and `histogram` for columns were optional already. Having them all optional is more consistent, and gives flexibility to e.g. drop some of the fields through transformations if they are difficult / impossible to calculate.

The added flexibility will make it possible to have alternative implementations for stats, and separates stats collection from stats and estimation processing in plans.

## How was this patch tested?

Refactored existing tests to work with refactored `ColumnStat` and `CatalogColumnStat`.
New tests added in `StatisticsSuite` checking that backwards / forwards compatibility is not broken.

Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>

Closes #20624 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-23445.
2018-02-26 23:37:31 -08:00
Jose Torres 7ec83658fb [SPARK-23491][SS] Remove explicit job cancellation from ContinuousExecution reconfiguring
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove queryExecutionThread.interrupt() from ContinuousExecution. As detailed in the JIRA, interrupting the thread is only relevant in the microbatch case; for continuous processing the query execution can quickly clean itself up without.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20622 from jose-torres/SPARK-23441.
2018-02-26 11:28:44 -08:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 1a198ce8f5 [SPARK-23459][SQL] Improve the error message when unknown column is specified in partition columns
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR avoids to print schema internal information when unknown column is specified in partition columns. This PR prints column names in the schema with more readable format.

The following is an example.

Source code
```
test("save with an unknown partition column") {
  withTempDir { dir =>
    val path = dir.getCanonicalPath
      Seq(1L -> "a").toDF("i", "j").write
        .format("parquet")
        .partitionBy("unknownColumn")
        .save(path)
  }
```
Output without this PR
```
Partition column unknownColumn not found in schema StructType(StructField(i,LongType,false), StructField(j,StringType,true));
```

Output with this PR
```
Partition column unknownColumn not found in schema struct<i:bigint,j:string>;
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #20653 from kiszk/SPARK-23459.
2018-02-23 16:30:32 -08:00
Tathagata Das 855ce13d04 [SPARK-23408][SS] Synchronize successive AddData actions in Streaming*JoinSuite
**The best way to review this PR is to ignore whitespace/indent changes. Use this link - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20650/files?w=1**

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The stream-stream join tests add data to multiple sources and expect it all to show up in the next batch. But there's a race condition; the new batch might trigger when only one of the AddData actions has been reached.

Prior attempt to solve this issue by jose-torres in #20646 attempted to simultaneously synchronize on all memory sources together when consecutive AddData was found in the actions. However, this carries the risk of deadlock as well as unintended modification of stress tests (see the above PR for a detailed explanation). Instead, this PR attempts the following.

- A new action called `StreamProgressBlockedActions` that allows multiple actions to be executed while the streaming query is blocked from making progress. This allows data to be added to multiple sources that are made visible simultaneously in the next batch.
- An alias of `StreamProgressBlockedActions` called `MultiAddData` is explicitly used in the `Streaming*JoinSuites` to add data to two memory sources simultaneously.

This should avoid unintentional modification of the stress tests (or any other test for that matter) while making sure that the flaky tests are deterministic.

## How was this patch tested?
Modified test cases in `Streaming*JoinSuites` where there are consecutive `AddData` actions.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20650 from tdas/SPARK-23408.
2018-02-23 12:40:58 -08:00
Wang Gengliang 049f243c59 [SPARK-23490][SQL] Check storage.locationUri with existing table in CreateTable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For CreateTable with Append mode, we should check if `storage.locationUri` is the same with existing table in `PreprocessTableCreation`

In the current code, there is only a simple exception if the `storage.locationUri` is different with existing table:
`org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found:`

which can be improved.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>

Closes #20660 from gengliangwang/locationUri.
2018-02-22 21:49:25 -08:00
Ryan Blue c8c4441dfd [SPARK-23418][SQL] Fail DataSourceV2 reads when user schema is passed, but not supported.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

DataSourceV2 initially allowed user-supplied schemas when a source doesn't implement `ReadSupportWithSchema`, as long as the schema was identical to the source's schema. This is confusing behavior because changes to an underlying table can cause a previously working job to fail with an exception that user-supplied schemas are not allowed.

This reverts commit adcb25a0624, which was added to #20387 so that it could be removed in a separate JIRA issue and PR.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes #20603 from rdblue/SPARK-23418-revert-adcb25a0624.
2018-02-21 15:10:08 +08:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 95e25ed1a8 [SPARK-23424][SQL] Add codegenStageId in comment
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR always adds `codegenStageId` in comment of the generated class. This is a replication of #20419  for post-Spark 2.3.
Closes #20419

```
/* 001 */ public Object generate(Object[] references) {
/* 002 */   return new GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1(references);
/* 003 */ }
/* 004 */
/* 005 */ // codegenStageId=1
/* 006 */ final class GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1 extends org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator {
/* 007 */   private Object[] references;
...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #20612 from kiszk/SPARK-23424.
2018-02-21 11:26:06 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3e48f3b9ee [SPARK-23434][SQL] Spark should not warn metadata directory for a HDFS file path
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In a kerberized cluster, when Spark reads a file path (e.g. `people.json`), it warns with a wrong warning message during looking up `people.json/_spark_metadata`. The root cause of this situation is the difference between `LocalFileSystem` and `DistributedFileSystem`. `LocalFileSystem.exists()` returns `false`, but `DistributedFileSystem.exists` raises `org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException`.

```scala
scala> spark.version
res0: String = 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT

scala> spark.read.json("file:///usr/hdp/current/spark-client/examples/src/main/resources/people.json").show
+----+-------+
| age|   name|
+----+-------+
|null|Michael|
|  30|   Andy|
|  19| Justin|
+----+-------+

scala> spark.read.json("hdfs:///tmp/people.json")
18/02/15 05:00:48 WARN streaming.FileStreamSink: Error while looking for metadata directory.
18/02/15 05:00:48 WARN streaming.FileStreamSink: Error while looking for metadata directory.
```

After this PR,
```scala
scala> spark.read.json("hdfs:///tmp/people.json").show
+----+-------+
| age|   name|
+----+-------+
|null|Michael|
|  30|   Andy|
|  19| Justin|
+----+-------+
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20616 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23434.
2018-02-20 16:02:44 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 83c008762a [SPARK-23456][SPARK-21783] Turn on native ORC impl and PPD by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Apache Spark 2.3 introduced `native` ORC supports with vectorization and many fixes. However, it's shipped as a not-default option. This PR enables `native` ORC implementation and predicate-pushdown by default for Apache Spark 2.4. We will improve and stabilize ORC data source before Apache Spark 2.4. And, eventually, Apache Spark will drop old Hive-based ORC code.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with existing tests.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20634 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23456.
2018-02-20 09:14:56 -08:00
Ryan Blue aadf9535b4 [SPARK-23203][SQL] DataSourceV2: Use immutable logical plans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

SPARK-23203: DataSourceV2 should use immutable catalyst trees instead of wrapping a mutable DataSourceV2Reader. This commit updates DataSourceV2Relation and consolidates much of the DataSourceV2 API requirements for the read path in it. Instead of wrapping a reader that changes, the relation lazily produces a reader from its configuration.

This commit also updates the predicate and projection push-down. Instead of the implementation from SPARK-22197, this reuses the rule matching from the Hive and DataSource read paths (using `PhysicalOperation`) and copies most of the implementation of `SparkPlanner.pruneFilterProject`, with updates for DataSourceV2. By reusing the implementation from other read paths, this should have fewer regressions from other read paths and is less code to maintain.

The new push-down rules also supports the following edge cases:

* The output of DataSourceV2Relation should be what is returned by the reader, in case the reader can only partially satisfy the requested schema projection
* The requested projection passed to the DataSourceV2Reader should include filter columns
* The push-down rule may be run more than once if filters are not pushed through projections

## How was this patch tested?

Existing push-down and read tests.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes #20387 from rdblue/SPARK-22386-push-down-immutable-trees.
2018-02-20 16:04:22 +08:00
Marco Gaido 651b0277fe [SPARK-23436][SQL] Infer partition as Date only if it can be casted to Date
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Before the patch, Spark could infer as Date a partition value which cannot be casted to Date (this can happen when there are extra characters after a valid date, like `2018-02-15AAA`).

When this happens and the input format has metadata which define the schema of the table, then `null` is returned as a value for the partition column, because the `cast` operator used in (`PartitioningAwareFileIndex.inferPartitioning`) is unable to convert the value.

The PR checks in the partition inference that values can be casted to Date and Timestamp, in order to infer that datatype to them.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20621 from mgaido91/SPARK-23436.
2018-02-20 13:56:38 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun f5850e7892 [SPARK-23457][SQL] Register task completion listeners first in ParquetFileFormat
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

ParquetFileFormat leaks opened files in some cases. This PR prevents that by registering task completion listers first before initialization.

- [spark-branch-2.3-test-sbt-hadoop-2.7](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-branch-2.3-test-sbt-hadoop-2.7/205/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql/FileBasedDataSourceSuite/_It_is_not_a_test_it_is_a_sbt_testing_SuiteSelector_/)
- [spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.6](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.6/4228/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet/ParquetQuerySuite/_It_is_not_a_test_it_is_a_sbt_testing_SuiteSelector_/)

```
Caused by: sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.lang.Throwable: null
	at org.apache.spark.DebugFilesystem$.addOpenStream(DebugFilesystem.scala:36)
	at org.apache.spark.DebugFilesystem.open(DebugFilesystem.scala:70)
	at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:769)
	at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetFileReader.<init>(ParquetFileReader.java:538)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.initialize(SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:149)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.VectorizedParquetRecordReader.initialize(VectorizedParquetRecordReader.java:133)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetFileFormat$$anonfun$buildReaderWithPartitionValues$1.apply(ParquetFileFormat.scala:400)
	at
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual. The following test case generates the same leakage.

```scala
  test("SPARK-23457 Register task completion listeners first in ParquetFileFormat") {
    withSQLConf(SQLConf.PARQUET_VECTORIZED_READER_BATCH_SIZE.key -> s"${Int.MaxValue}") {
      withTempDir { dir =>
        val basePath = dir.getCanonicalPath
        Seq(0).toDF("a").write.format("parquet").save(new Path(basePath, "first").toString)
        Seq(1).toDF("a").write.format("parquet").save(new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val df = spark.read.parquet(
          new Path(basePath, "first").toString,
          new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val e = intercept[SparkException] {
          df.collect()
        }
        assert(e.getCause.isInstanceOf[OutOfMemoryError])
      }
    }
  }
```

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20619 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23390.
2018-02-20 13:33:03 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3ee3b2ae1f [SPARK-23340][SQL] Upgrade Apache ORC to 1.4.3
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR updates Apache ORC dependencies to 1.4.3 released on February 9th. Apache ORC 1.4.2 release removes unnecessary dependencies and 1.4.3 has 5 more patches (https://s.apache.org/Fll8).

Especially, the following ORC-285 is fixed at 1.4.3.

```scala
scala> val df = Seq(Array.empty[Float]).toDF()

scala> df.write.format("orc").save("/tmp/floatarray")

scala> spark.read.orc("/tmp/floatarray")
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [value: array<float>]

scala> spark.read.orc("/tmp/floatarray").show()
18/02/12 22:09:10 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 1.0 (TID 1)
java.io.IOException: Error reading file: file:/tmp/floatarray/part-00000-9c0b461b-4df1-4c23-aac1-3e4f349ac7d6-c000.snappy.orc
	at org.apache.orc.impl.RecordReaderImpl.nextBatch(RecordReaderImpl.java:1191)
	at org.apache.orc.mapreduce.OrcMapreduceRecordReader.ensureBatch(OrcMapreduceRecordReader.java:78)
...
Caused by: java.io.EOFException: Read past EOF for compressed stream Stream for column 2 kind DATA position: 0 length: 0 range: 0 offset: 0 limit: 0
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins test.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20511 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23340.
2018-02-17 00:25:36 -08:00
Kris Mok 15ad4a7f10 [SPARK-23447][SQL] Cleanup codegen template for Literal
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Cleaned up the codegen templates for `Literal`s, to make sure that the `ExprCode` returned from `Literal.doGenCode()` has:
1. an empty `code` field;
2. an `isNull` field of either literal `true` or `false`;
3. a `value` field that is just a simple literal/constant.

Before this PR, there are a couple of paths that would return a non-trivial `code` and all of them are actually unnecessary. The `NaN` and `Infinity` constants for `double` and `float` can be accessed through constants directly available so there's no need to add a reference for them.

Also took the opportunity to add a new util method for ease of creating `ExprCode` for inline-able non-null values.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>

Closes #20626 from rednaxelafx/codegen-literal.
2018-02-17 10:54:14 +08:00
Tathagata Das 0a73aa31f4 [SPARK-23362][SS] Migrate Kafka Microbatch source to v2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Migrating KafkaSource (with data source v1) to KafkaMicroBatchReader (with data source v2).

Performance comparison:
In a unit test with in-process Kafka broker, I tested the read throughput of V1 and V2 using 20M records in a single partition. They were comparable.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, few modified to be better tests than the existing ones.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20554 from tdas/SPARK-23362.
2018-02-16 14:30:19 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 6968c3cfd7 [MINOR][SQL] Fix an error message about inserting into bucketed tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This replaces `Sparkcurrently` to `Spark currently` in the following error message.

```scala
scala> sql("insert into t2 select * from v1")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Output Hive table `default`.`t2`
is bucketed but Sparkcurrently does NOT populate bucketed ...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20617 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ERROR-MSG.
2018-02-15 09:40:08 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 2f0498d1e8 [SPARK-23426][SQL] Use hive ORC impl and disable PPD for Spark 2.3.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To prevent any regressions, this PR changes ORC implementation to `hive` by default like Spark 2.2.X.
Users can enable `native` ORC. Also, ORC PPD is also restored to `false` like Spark 2.2.X.

![orc_section](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9700541/36221575-57a1d702-1173-11e8-89fe-dca5842f4ca7.png)

## How was this patch tested?

Pass all test cases.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20610 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ORC-DISABLE.
2018-02-15 08:55:39 -08:00
hyukjinkwon ed86476098 [SPARK-23359][SQL] Adds an alias 'names' of 'fieldNames' in Scala's StructType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to add an alias 'names' of  'fieldNames' in Scala. Please see the discussion in [SPARK-20090](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20090).

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests added in `DataTypeSuite.scala`.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20545 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23359.
2018-02-15 17:13:05 +08:00
Wenchen Fan f38c760638 [SPARK-23419][SPARK-23416][SS] data source v2 write path should re-throw interruption exceptions directly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Streaming execution has a list of exceptions that means interruption, and handle them specially. `WriteToDataSourceV2Exec` should also respect this list and not wrap them with `SparkException`.

## How was this patch tested?

existing test.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20605 from cloud-fan/write.
2018-02-15 16:59:44 +08:00
gatorsmile 95e4b49160 [SPARK-23094] Revert [] Fix invalid character handling in JsonDataSource
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to revert the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20302, because it causes a regression.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20614 from gatorsmile/revertJsonFix.
2018-02-14 23:56:02 -08:00
gatorsmile a77ebb0921 [SPARK-23421][SPARK-22356][SQL] Document the behavior change in
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19579 introduces a behavior change. We need to document it in the migration guide.

## How was this patch tested?
Also update the HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite to verify it.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20606 from gatorsmile/addMigrationGuide.
2018-02-14 23:52:59 -08:00
Tathagata Das 658d9d9d78 [SPARK-23406][SS] Enable stream-stream self-joins
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Solved two bugs to enable stream-stream self joins.

### Incorrect analysis due to missing MultiInstanceRelation trait
Streaming leaf nodes did not extend MultiInstanceRelation, which is necessary for the catalyst analyzer to convert the self-join logical plan DAG into a tree (by creating new instances of the leaf relations). This was causing the error `Failure when resolving conflicting references in Join:` (see JIRA for details).

### Incorrect attribute rewrite when splicing batch plans in MicroBatchExecution
When splicing the source's batch plan into the streaming plan (by replacing the StreamingExecutionPlan), we were rewriting the attribute reference in the streaming plan with the new attribute references from the batch plan. This was incorrectly handling the scenario when multiple StreamingExecutionRelation point to the same source, and therefore eventually point to the same batch plan returned by the source. Here is an example query, and its corresponding plan transformations.
```
val df = input.toDF
val join =
      df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value).join(
        df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value), "key")
```
Streaming logical plan before splicing the batch plan
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12  // two different leaves pointing to same source
```
Batch logical plan after splicing the batch plan and before rewriting
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12
```
Batch logical plan after rewriting the attributes. Specifically, for spliced, the new output attributes (value#66) replace the earlier output attributes (value#12, and value#1, one for each StreamingExecutionRelation).
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]       // both value#1 and value#12 replaces by value#66
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9, value#66]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```
This causes the optimizer to eliminate value#66 from one side of the join.
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9]   // this does not generate value, incorrect join results
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

**Solution**: Instead of rewriting attributes, use a Project to introduce aliases between the output attribute references and the new reference generated by the spliced plans. The analyzer and optimizer will take care of the rest.
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- Project [value#66 AS value#1]   // solution: project with aliases
   :     +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- Project [value#66 AS value#12]    // solution: project with aliases
         +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

## How was this patch tested?
New unit test

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20598 from tdas/SPARK-23406.
2018-02-14 14:27:02 -08:00
gatorsmile 400a1d9e25 Revert "[SPARK-23249][SQL] Improved block merging logic for partitions"
This reverts commit 8c21170dec.
2018-02-14 10:57:12 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 357babde5a [SPARK-23399][SQL] Register a task completion listener first for OrcColumnarBatchReader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to resolve an open file leakage issue reported at [SPARK-23390](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23390) by moving the listener registration position. Currently, the sequence is like the following.

1. Create `batchReader`
2. `batchReader.initialize` opens a ORC file.
3. `batchReader.initBatch` may take a long time to alloc memory in some environment and cause errors.
4. `Option(TaskContext.get()).foreach(_.addTaskCompletionListener(_ => iter.close()))`

This PR moves 4 before 2 and 3. To sum up, the new sequence is 1 -> 4 -> 2 -> 3.

## How was this patch tested?

Manual. The following test case makes OOM intentionally to cause leaked filesystem connection in the current code base. With this patch, leakage doesn't occurs.

```scala
  // This should be tested manually because it raises OOM intentionally
  // in order to cause `Leaked filesystem connection`.
  test("SPARK-23399 Register a task completion listener first for OrcColumnarBatchReader") {
    withSQLConf(SQLConf.ORC_VECTORIZED_READER_BATCH_SIZE.key -> s"${Int.MaxValue}") {
      withTempDir { dir =>
        val basePath = dir.getCanonicalPath
        Seq(0).toDF("a").write.format("orc").save(new Path(basePath, "first").toString)
        Seq(1).toDF("a").write.format("orc").save(new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val df = spark.read.orc(
          new Path(basePath, "first").toString,
          new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val e = intercept[SparkException] {
          df.collect()
        }
        assert(e.getCause.isInstanceOf[OutOfMemoryError])
      }
    }
  }
```

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20590 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23399.
2018-02-14 10:55:24 +08:00
gatorsmile d6f5e172b4 Revert "[SPARK-23303][SQL] improve the explain result for data source v2 relations"
This reverts commit f17b936f0d.
2018-02-13 16:21:17 -08:00
gatorsmile 2ee76c22b6 [SPARK-23400][SQL] Add a constructors for ScalaUDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In this upcoming 2.3 release, we changed the interface of `ScalaUDF`. Unfortunately, some Spark packages (e.g., spark-deep-learning) are using our internal class `ScalaUDF`. In the release 2.3, we added new parameters into this class. The users hit the binary compatibility issues and got the exception:

```
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.&lt;init&gt;(Ljava/lang/Object;Lorg/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType;Lscala/collection/Seq;Lscala/collection/Seq;Lscala/Option;)V
```

This PR is to improve the backward compatibility. However, we definitely should not encourage the external packages to use our internal classes. This might make us hard to maintain/develop the codes in Spark.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20591 from gatorsmile/scalaUDF.
2018-02-13 11:56:49 -08:00
Bogdan Raducanu 05d051293f [SPARK-23316][SQL] AnalysisException after max iteration reached for IN query
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added flag ignoreNullability to DataType.equalsStructurally.
The previous semantic is for ignoreNullability=false.
When ignoreNullability=true equalsStructurally ignores nullability of contained types (map key types, value types, array element types, structure field types).
In.checkInputTypes calls equalsStructurally to check if the children types match. They should match regardless of nullability (which is just a hint), so it is now called with ignoreNullability=true.

## How was this patch tested?
New test in SubquerySuite

Author: Bogdan Raducanu <bogdan@databricks.com>

Closes #20548 from bogdanrdc/SPARK-23316.
2018-02-13 09:49:52 -08:00
Wenchen Fan f17b936f0d [SPARK-23303][SQL] improve the explain result for data source v2 relations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The current explain result for data source v2 relation is unreadable:
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Filter ('i > 6)
+- AnalysisBarrier
      +- Project [j#1]
         +- DataSourceV2Relation [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
j: int
Project [j#1]
+- Filter (i#0 > 6)
   +- Project [j#1, i#0]
      +- DataSourceV2Relation [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [j#1]
+- Filter isnotnull(i#0)
   +- DataSourceV2Relation [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [j#1]
+- *(1) Filter isnotnull(i#0)
   +- *(1) DataSourceV2Scan [i#0, j#1], org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.AdvancedDataSourceV2$Reader3b415940
```

after this PR
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('j, None)]
+- AnalysisBarrier
      +- Relation AdvancedDataSourceV2[i#0, j#1]

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
j: int
Project [j#1]
+- Relation AdvancedDataSourceV2[i#0, j#1]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Relation AdvancedDataSourceV2[j#1]

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Scan AdvancedDataSourceV2[j#1]
```
-------
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
i: int, j: int
Filter (i#88 > 3)
+- Relation JavaAdvancedDataSourceV2[i#88, j#89]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter isnotnull(i#88)
+- Relation JavaAdvancedDataSourceV2[i#88, j#89] (PushedFilter: [GreaterThan(i,3)])

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Filter isnotnull(i#88)
+- *(1) Scan JavaAdvancedDataSourceV2[i#88, j#89] (PushedFilter: [GreaterThan(i,3)])
```

an example for streaming query
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
Aggregate [value#6], [value#6, count(1) AS count(1)#11L]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
   +- MapElements <function1>, class java.lang.String, [StructField(value,StringType,true)], obj#5: java.lang.String
      +- DeserializeToObject cast(value#25 as string).toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
         +- Streaming Relation FakeDataSourceV2$[value#25]

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: string, count(1): bigint
Aggregate [value#6], [value#6, count(1) AS count(1)#11L]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
   +- MapElements <function1>, class java.lang.String, [StructField(value,StringType,true)], obj#5: java.lang.String
      +- DeserializeToObject cast(value#25 as string).toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
         +- Streaming Relation FakeDataSourceV2$[value#25]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Aggregate [value#6], [value#6, count(1) AS count(1)#11L]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
   +- MapElements <function1>, class java.lang.String, [StructField(value,StringType,true)], obj#5: java.lang.String
      +- DeserializeToObject value#25.toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
         +- Streaming Relation FakeDataSourceV2$[value#25]

== Physical Plan ==
*(4) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[count(1)], output=[value#6, count(1)#11L])
+- StateStoreSave [value#6], state info [ checkpoint = *********(redacted)/cloud/dev/spark/target/tmp/temporary-549f264b-2531-4fcb-a52f-433c77347c12/state, runId = f84d9da9-2f8c-45c1-9ea1-70791be684de, opId = 0, ver = 0, numPartitions = 5], Complete, 0
   +- *(3) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[merge_count(1)], output=[value#6, count#16L])
      +- StateStoreRestore [value#6], state info [ checkpoint = *********(redacted)/cloud/dev/spark/target/tmp/temporary-549f264b-2531-4fcb-a52f-433c77347c12/state, runId = f84d9da9-2f8c-45c1-9ea1-70791be684de, opId = 0, ver = 0, numPartitions = 5]
         +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[merge_count(1)], output=[value#6, count#16L])
            +- Exchange hashpartitioning(value#6, 5)
               +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[value#6], functions=[partial_count(1)], output=[value#6, count#16L])
                  +- *(1) SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true, false) AS value#6]
                     +- *(1) MapElements <function1>, obj#5: java.lang.String
                        +- *(1) DeserializeToObject value#25.toString, obj#4: java.lang.String
                           +- *(1) Scan FakeDataSourceV2$[value#25]
```
## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20477 from cloud-fan/explain.
2018-02-12 21:12:22 -08:00
Feng Liu ed4e78bd60 [SPARK-23379][SQL] skip when setting the same current database in HiveClientImpl
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

If the target database name is as same as the current database, we should be able to skip one metastore access.

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>

Closes #20565 from liufengdb/remove-redundant.
2018-02-12 20:57:26 -08:00
Ryan Blue c1bcef876c [SPARK-23323][SQL] Support commit coordinator for DataSourceV2 writes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

DataSourceV2 batch writes should use the output commit coordinator if it is required by the data source. This adds a new method, `DataWriterFactory#useCommitCoordinator`, that determines whether the coordinator will be used. If the write factory returns true, `WriteToDataSourceV2` will use the coordinator for batch writes.

## How was this patch tested?

This relies on existing write tests, which now use the commit coordinator.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes #20490 from rdblue/SPARK-23323-add-commit-coordinator.
2018-02-13 11:40:34 +08:00
sychen 4104b68e95 [SPARK-23230][SQL] When hive.default.fileformat is other kinds of file types, create textfile table cause a serde error
When hive.default.fileformat is other kinds of file types, create textfile table cause a serde error.
We should take the default type of textfile and sequencefile both as org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe.

```
set hive.default.fileformat=orc;
create table tbl( i string ) stored as textfile;
desc formatted tbl;

Serde Library org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.orc.OrcSerde
InputFormat  org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat
OutputFormat  org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveIgnoreKeyTextOutputFormat
```

Author: sychen <sychen@ctrip.com>

Closes #20406 from cxzl25/default_serde.
2018-02-12 16:00:47 -08:00
Feng Liu fba01b9a65 [SPARK-23378][SQL] move setCurrentDatabase from HiveExternalCatalog to HiveClientImpl
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This removes the special case that `alterPartitions` call from `HiveExternalCatalog` can reset the current database in the hive client as a side effect.

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>

Closes #20564 from liufengdb/move.
2018-02-12 14:58:31 -08:00
Takuya UESHIN 0c66fe4f22 [SPARK-22002][SQL][FOLLOWUP][TEST] Add a test to check if the original schema doesn't have metadata.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up pr of #19231 which modified the behavior to remove metadata from JDBC table schema.
This pr adds a test to check if the schema doesn't have metadata.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a test and existing tests.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>

Closes #20585 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-22002/fup1.
2018-02-12 12:20:29 -08:00
James Thompson 5bb11411ae [SPARK-23388][SQL] Support for Parquet Binary DecimalType in VectorizedColumnReader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Re-add support for parquet binary DecimalType in VectorizedColumnReader

## How was this patch tested?

Existing test suite

Author: James Thompson <jamesthomp@users.noreply.github.com>

Closes #20580 from jamesthomp/jt/add-back-binary-decimal.
2018-02-12 11:34:56 -08:00
liuxian 4a4dd4f36f [SPARK-23391][CORE] It may lead to overflow for some integer multiplication
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the `getBlockData`,`blockId.reduceId` is the `Int` type, when it is greater than 2^28, `blockId.reduceId*8` will overflow
In the `decompress0`, `len` and  `unitSize` are  Int type, so `len * unitSize` may lead to  overflow
## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20581 from 10110346/overflow2.
2018-02-12 08:49:45 -06:00
Wenchen Fan 0e2c266de7 [SPARK-22977][SQL] fix web UI SQL tab for CTAS
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a regression in Spark 2.3.

In Spark 2.2, we have a fragile UI support for SQL data writing commands. We only track the input query plan of `FileFormatWriter` and display its metrics. This is not ideal because we don't know who triggered the writing(can be table insertion, CTAS, etc.), but it's still useful to see the metrics of the input query.

In Spark 2.3, we introduced a new mechanism: `DataWritigCommand`, to fix the UI issue entirely. Now these writing commands have real children, and we don't need to hack into the `FileFormatWriter` for the UI. This also helps with `explain`, now `explain` can show the physical plan of the input query, while in 2.2 the physical writing plan is simply `ExecutedCommandExec` and it has no child.

However there is a regression in CTAS. CTAS commands don't extend `DataWritigCommand`, and we don't have the UI hack in `FileFormatWriter` anymore, so the UI for CTAS is just an empty node. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22977 for more information about this UI issue.

To fix it, we should apply the `DataWritigCommand` mechanism to CTAS commands.

TODO: In the future, we should refactor this part and create some physical layer code pieces for data writing, and reuse them in different writing commands. We should have different logical nodes for different operators, even some of them share some same logic, e.g. CTAS, CREATE TABLE, INSERT TABLE. Internally we can share the same physical logic.

## How was this patch tested?

manually tested.
For data source table
<img width="644" alt="1" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3182036/35874155-bdffab28-0ba6-11e8-94a8-e32e106ba069.png">
For hive table
<img width="666" alt="2" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3182036/35874161-c437e2a8-0ba6-11e8-98ed-7930f01432c5.png">

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20521 from cloud-fan/UI.
2018-02-12 22:07:59 +08:00
caoxuewen caeb108e25 [MINOR][TEST] spark.testing` No effect on the SparkFunSuite unit test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, we use SBT and MAVN to spark unit test, are affected by the parameters of `spark.testing`. However, when using the IDE test tool, `spark.testing` support is not very good, sometimes need to be manually added to the beforeEach. example: HiveSparkSubmitSuite RPackageUtilsSuite SparkSubmitSuite. The PR unified `spark.testing` parameter extraction to SparkFunSuite, support IDE test tool, and the test code is more compact.

## How was this patch tested?

the existed test cases.

Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20582 from heary-cao/sparktesting.
2018-02-12 22:05:27 +08:00
hyukjinkwon c338c8cf82 [SPARK-23352][PYTHON] Explicitly specify supported types in Pandas UDFs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR targets to explicitly specify supported types in Pandas UDFs.
The main change here is to add a deduplicated and explicit type checking in `returnType` ahead with documenting this; however, it happened to fix multiple things.

1. Currently, we don't support `BinaryType` in Pandas UDFs, for example, see:

    ```python
    from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf
    pudf = pandas_udf(lambda x: x, "binary")
    df = spark.createDataFrame([[bytearray(1)]])
    df.select(pudf("_1")).show()
    ```
    ```
    ...
    TypeError: Unsupported type in conversion to Arrow: BinaryType
    ```

    We can document this behaviour for its guide.

2. Also, the grouped aggregate Pandas UDF fails fast on `ArrayType` but seems we can support this case.

    ```python
    from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
    foo = pandas_udf(lambda v: v.mean(), 'array<double>', PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
    df = spark.range(100).selectExpr("id", "array(id) as value")
    df.groupBy("id").agg(foo("value")).show()
    ```

    ```
    ...
     NotImplementedError: ArrayType, StructType and MapType are not supported with PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG
    ```

3. Since we can check the return type ahead, we can fail fast before actual execution.

    ```python
    # we can fail fast at this stage because we know the schema ahead
    pandas_udf(lambda x: x, BinaryType())
    ```

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested and unit tests for `BinaryType` and `ArrayType(...)` were added.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20531 from HyukjinKwon/pudf-cleanup.
2018-02-12 20:49:36 +09:00
Wenchen Fan 6efd5d117e [SPARK-23390][SQL] Flaky Test Suite: FileBasedDataSourceSuite in Spark 2.3/hadoop 2.7
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This test only fails with sbt on Hadoop 2.7, I can't reproduce it locally, but here is my speculation by looking at the code:
1. FileSystem.delete doesn't delete the directory entirely, somehow we can still open the file as a 0-length empty file.(just speculation)
2. ORC intentionally allow empty files, and the reader fails during reading without closing the file stream.

This PR improves the test to make sure all files are deleted and can't be opened.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20584 from cloud-fan/flaky-test.
2018-02-11 23:46:23 -08:00
Wenchen Fan 4bbd7443eb [SPARK-23376][SQL] creating UnsafeKVExternalSorter with BytesToBytesMap may fail
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a long-standing bug in `UnsafeKVExternalSorter` and was reported in the dev list multiple times.

When creating `UnsafeKVExternalSorter` with `BytesToBytesMap`, we need to create a `UnsafeInMemorySorter` to sort the data in `BytesToBytesMap`. The data format of the sorter and the map is same, so no data movement is required. However, both the sorter and the map need a point array for some bookkeeping work.

There is an optimization in `UnsafeKVExternalSorter`: reuse the point array between the sorter and the map, to avoid an extra memory allocation. This sounds like a reasonable optimization, the length of the `BytesToBytesMap` point array is at least 4 times larger than the number of keys(to avoid hash collision, the hash table size should be at least 2 times larger than the number of keys, and each key occupies 2 slots). `UnsafeInMemorySorter` needs the pointer array size to be 4 times of the number of entries, so we are safe to reuse the point array.

However, the number of keys of the map doesn't equal to the number of entries in the map, because `BytesToBytesMap` supports duplicated keys. This breaks the assumption of the above optimization and we may run out of space when inserting data into the sorter, and hit error
```
java.lang.IllegalStateException: There is no space for new record
   at org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeInMemorySorter.insertRecord(UnsafeInMemorySorter.java:239)
   at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeKVExternalSorter.<init>(UnsafeKVExternalSorter.java:149)
...
```

This PR fixes this bug by creating a new point array if the existing one is not big enough.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20561 from cloud-fan/bug.
2018-02-12 00:03:49 +08:00
Feng Liu 6d7c38330e [SPARK-23275][SQL] fix the thread leaking in hive/tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20441.

The two lines actually can trigger the hive metastore bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16844

The two configs are not in the default `ObjectStore` properties, so any run hive commands after these two lines will set the `propsChanged` flag in the `ObjectStore.setConf` and then cause thread leaks.

I don't think the two lines are very useful. They can be removed safely.

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>

Closes #20562 from liufengdb/fix-omm.
2018-02-09 16:21:47 -08:00
Jacek Laskowski 557938e283 [MINOR][HIVE] Typo fixes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Typo fixes (with expanding a Hive property)

## How was this patch tested?

local build. Awaiting Jenkins

Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>

Closes #20550 from jaceklaskowski/hiveutils-typos.
2018-02-09 18:18:30 -06:00
Dongjoon Hyun 8cbcc33876 [SPARK-23186][SQL] Initialize DriverManager first before loading JDBC Drivers
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Since some JDBC Drivers have class initialization code to call `DriverManager`, we need to initialize `DriverManager` first in order to avoid potential executor-side **deadlock** situations like the following (or [STORM-2527](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2527)).

```
Thread 9587: (state = BLOCKED)
 - sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(java.lang.reflect.Constructor, java.lang.Object[]) bci=0 (Compiled frame; information may be imprecise)
 - sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(java.lang.Object[]) bci=85, line=62 (Compiled frame)
 - sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(java.lang.Object[]) bci=5, line=45 (Compiled frame)
 - java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(java.lang.Object[]) bci=79, line=423 (Compiled frame)
 - java.lang.Class.newInstance() bci=138, line=442 (Compiled frame)
 - java.util.ServiceLoader$LazyIterator.nextService() bci=119, line=380 (Interpreted frame)
 - java.util.ServiceLoader$LazyIterator.next() bci=11, line=404 (Interpreted frame)
 - java.util.ServiceLoader$1.next() bci=37, line=480 (Interpreted frame)
 - java.sql.DriverManager$2.run() bci=21, line=603 (Interpreted frame)
 - java.sql.DriverManager$2.run() bci=1, line=583 (Interpreted frame)
 - java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.security.PrivilegedAction) bci=0 (Compiled frame)
 - java.sql.DriverManager.loadInitialDrivers() bci=27, line=583 (Interpreted frame)
 - java.sql.DriverManager.<clinit>() bci=32, line=101 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.phoenix.mapreduce.util.ConnectionUtil.getConnection(java.lang.String, java.lang.Integer, java.lang.String, java.util.Properties) bci=12, line=98 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.phoenix.mapreduce.util.ConnectionUtil.getInputConnection(org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration, java.util.Properties) bci=22, line=57 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.phoenix.mapreduce.PhoenixInputFormat.getQueryPlan(org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.JobContext, org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration) bci=61, line=116 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.phoenix.mapreduce.PhoenixInputFormat.createRecordReader(org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.InputSplit, org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.TaskAttemptContext) bci=10, line=71 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.spark.rdd.NewHadoopRDD$$anon$1.<init>(org.apache.spark.rdd.NewHadoopRDD, org.apache.spark.Partition, org.apache.spark.TaskContext) bci=233, line=156 (Interpreted frame)

Thread 9170: (state = BLOCKED)
 - org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixDriver.<clinit>() bci=35, line=125 (Interpreted frame)
 - sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(java.lang.reflect.Constructor, java.lang.Object[]) bci=0 (Compiled frame)
 - sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(java.lang.Object[]) bci=85, line=62 (Compiled frame)
 - sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(java.lang.Object[]) bci=5, line=45 (Compiled frame)
 - java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(java.lang.Object[]) bci=79, line=423 (Compiled frame)
 - java.lang.Class.newInstance() bci=138, line=442 (Compiled frame)
 - org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.DriverRegistry$.register(java.lang.String) bci=89, line=46 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcUtils$$anonfun$createConnectionFactory$2.apply() bci=7, line=53 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcUtils$$anonfun$createConnectionFactory$2.apply() bci=1, line=52 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCRDD$$anon$1.<init>(org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCRDD, org.apache.spark.Partition, org.apache.spark.TaskContext) bci=81, line=347 (Interpreted frame)
 - org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCRDD.compute(org.apache.spark.Partition, org.apache.spark.TaskContext) bci=7, line=339 (Interpreted frame)
```

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20359 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23186.
2018-02-09 12:54:57 +08:00
Wenchen Fan a75f927173 [SPARK-23268][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Reorganize packages in data source V2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435.

While reorganizing the packages for streaming data source v2, the top level stream read/write support interfaces should not be in the reader/writer package, but should be in the `sources.v2` package, to follow the `ReadSupport`, `WriteSupport`, etc.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20509 from cloud-fan/followup.
2018-02-08 19:20:11 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 7f5f5fb129 [SPARK-23348][SQL] append data using saveAsTable should adjust the data types
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For inserting/appending data to an existing table, Spark should adjust the data types of the input query according to the table schema, or fail fast if it's uncastable.

There are several ways to insert/append data: SQL API, `DataFrameWriter.insertInto`, `DataFrameWriter.saveAsTable`. The first 2 ways create `InsertIntoTable` plan, and the last way creates `CreateTable` plan. However, we only adjust input query data types for `InsertIntoTable`, and users may hit weird errors when appending data using `saveAsTable`. See the JIRA for the error case.

This PR fixes this bug by adjusting data types for `CreateTable` too.

## How was this patch tested?

new test.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20527 from cloud-fan/saveAsTable.
2018-02-08 00:08:54 -08:00
gatorsmile 3473fda6dc Revert [SPARK-22279][SQL] Turn on spark.sql.hive.convertMetastoreOrc by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is to revert the changes made in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19499 , because this causes a regression. We should not ignore the table-specific compression conf when the Hive serde tables are converted to the data source tables.

## How was this patch tested?

The existing tests.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20536 from gatorsmile/revert22279.
2018-02-08 12:21:18 +08:00
Tathagata Das 30295bf5a6 [SPARK-23092][SQL] Migrate MemoryStream to DataSourceV2 APIs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR migrates the MemoryStream to DataSourceV2 APIs.

One additional change is in the reported keys in StreamingQueryProgress.durationMs. "getOffset" and "getBatch" replaced with "setOffsetRange" and "getEndOffset" as tracking these make more sense. Unit tests changed accordingly.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests, few updated unit tests.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>

Closes #20445 from tdas/SPARK-23092.
2018-02-07 15:22:53 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 9841ae0313 [SPARK-23345][SQL] Remove open stream record even closing it fails
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When `DebugFilesystem` closes opened stream, if any exception occurs, we still need to remove the open stream record from `DebugFilesystem`. Otherwise, it goes to report leaked filesystem connection.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #20524 from viirya/SPARK-23345.
2018-02-07 09:48:49 -08:00
gatorsmile 9775df67f9 [SPARK-23122][PYSPARK][FOLLOWUP] Replace registerTempTable by createOrReplaceTempView
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace `registerTempTable` by `createOrReplaceTempView`.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20523 from gatorsmile/updateExamples.
2018-02-07 23:24:16 +09:00
gatorsmile c36fecc3b4 [SPARK-23327][SQL] Update the description and tests of three external API or functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the description and tests of three external API or functions `createFunction `, `length` and `repartitionByRange `

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20495 from gatorsmile/updateFunc.
2018-02-06 16:46:43 -08:00
Wenchen Fan b96a083b1c [SPARK-23315][SQL] failed to get output from canonicalized data source v2 related plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`DataSourceV2Relation`  keeps a `fullOutput` and resolves the real output on demand by column name lookup. i.e.
```
lazy val output: Seq[Attribute] = reader.readSchema().map(_.name).map { name =>
  fullOutput.find(_.name == name).get
}
```

This will be broken after we canonicalize the plan, because all attribute names become "None", see https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v2.3.0-rc1/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala#L42

To fix this, `DataSourceV2Relation` should just keep `output`, and update the `output` when doing column pruning.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test case

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20485 from cloud-fan/canonicalize.
2018-02-06 12:43:45 -08:00
Wenchen Fan ac7454cac0 [SPARK-23312][SQL][FOLLOWUP] add a config to turn off vectorized cache reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20483 tried to provide a way to turn off the new columnar cache reader, to restore the behavior in 2.2. However even we turn off that config, the behavior is still different than 2.2.

If the output data are rows, we still enable whole stage codegen for the scan node, which is different with 2.2, we should also fix it.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20513 from cloud-fan/cache.
2018-02-06 12:27:37 -08:00
Xingbo Jiang c2766b07b4 [SPARK-23330][WEBUI] Spark UI SQL executions page throws NPE
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Spark SQL executions page throws the following error and the page crashes:
```
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing /SQL/. Reason:

Server Error
Caused by:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at scala.collection.immutable.StringOps$.length$extension(StringOps.scala:47)
at scala.collection.immutable.StringOps.length(StringOps.scala:47)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized$class.isEmpty(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:27)
at scala.collection.immutable.StringOps.isEmpty(StringOps.scala:29)
at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.nonEmpty(TraversableOnce.scala:111)
at scala.collection.immutable.StringOps.nonEmpty(StringOps.scala:29)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ui.ExecutionTable.descriptionCell(AllExecutionsPage.scala:182)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ui.ExecutionTable.row(AllExecutionsPage.scala:155)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ui.ExecutionTable$$anonfun$8.apply(AllExecutionsPage.scala:204)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ui.ExecutionTable$$anonfun$8.apply(AllExecutionsPage.scala:204)
at org.apache.spark.ui.UIUtils$$anonfun$listingTable$2.apply(UIUtils.scala:339)
at org.apache.spark.ui.UIUtils$$anonfun$listingTable$2.apply(UIUtils.scala:339)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:104)
at org.apache.spark.ui.UIUtils$.listingTable(UIUtils.scala:339)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ui.ExecutionTable.toNodeSeq(AllExecutionsPage.scala:203)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ui.AllExecutionsPage.render(AllExecutionsPage.scala:67)
at org.apache.spark.ui.WebUI$$anonfun$2.apply(WebUI.scala:82)
at org.apache.spark.ui.WebUI$$anonfun$2.apply(WebUI.scala:82)
at org.apache.spark.ui.JettyUtils$$anon$3.doGet(JettyUtils.scala:90)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:687)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:848)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:584)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:512)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:213)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:534)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:320)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251)
at org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:283)
at org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:108)
at org.eclipse.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```

One of the possible reason that this page fails may be the `SparkListenerSQLExecutionStart` event get dropped before processed, so the execution description and details don't get updated.
This was not a issue in 2.2 because it would ignore any job start event that arrives before the corresponding execution start event, which doesn't sound like a good decision.

We shall try to handle the null values in the front page side, that is, try to give a default value when `execution.details` or `execution.description` is null.
Another possible approach is not to spill the `LiveExecutionData` in `SQLAppStatusListener.update(exec: LiveExecutionData)` if `exec.details` is null. This is not ideal because this way you will not see the execution if `SparkListenerSQLExecutionStart` event is lost, because `AllExecutionsPage` only read executions from KVStore.

## How was this patch tested?

After the change, the page shows the following:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4784782/35775480-28cc5fde-093e-11e8-8ccc-f58c2ef4a514.png)

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20502 from jiangxb1987/executionPage.
2018-02-05 14:17:11 -08:00
Shixiong Zhu a6bf3db207 [SPARK-23307][WEBUI] Sort jobs/stages/tasks/queries with the completed timestamp before cleaning up them
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Sort jobs/stages/tasks/queries with the completed timestamp before cleaning up them to make the behavior consistent with 2.2.

## How was this patch tested?

- Jenkins.
- Manually ran the following codes and checked the UI for jobs/stages/tasks/queries.

```
spark.ui.retainedJobs 10
spark.ui.retainedStages 10
spark.sql.ui.retainedExecutions 10
spark.ui.retainedTasks 10
```

```
new Thread() {
  override def run() {
    spark.range(1, 2).foreach { i =>
        Thread.sleep(10000)
    }
  }
}.start()

Thread.sleep(5000)

for (_ <- 1 to 20) {
    new Thread() {
      override def run() {
        spark.range(1, 2).foreach { i =>
        }
      }
    }.start()
}

Thread.sleep(15000)
  spark.range(1, 2).foreach { i =>
}

sc.makeRDD(1 to 100, 100).foreach { i =>
}
```

Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>

Closes #20481 from zsxwing/SPARK-23307.
2018-02-05 18:41:49 +08:00
Yuming Wang 6fb3fd1536 [SPARK-22036][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix decimalArithmeticOperations.sql
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix decimalArithmeticOperations.sql test

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Author: wangyum <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>

Closes #20498 from wangyum/SPARK-22036.
2018-02-04 09:15:48 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 522e0b1866 [SPARK-23305][SQL][TEST] Test spark.sql.files.ignoreMissingFiles for all file-based data sources
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Like Parquet, all file-based data source handles `spark.sql.files.ignoreMissingFiles` correctly. We had better have a test coverage for feature parity and in order to prevent future accidental regression for all data sources.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass Jenkins with a newly added test case.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20479 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23305.
2018-02-03 00:04:00 -08:00
caoxuewen 63b49fa2e5 [SPARK-23311][SQL][TEST] add FilterFunction test case for test CombineTypedFilters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the current test case for CombineTypedFilters, we lack the test of FilterFunction, so let's add it.
In addition, in TypedFilterOptimizationSuite's existing test cases, Let's extract a common LocalRelation.

## How was this patch tested?

add new test cases.

Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20482 from heary-cao/TypedFilterOptimizationSuite.
2018-02-03 00:02:03 -08:00
Wenchen Fan fe73cb4b43 [SPARK-23317][SQL] rename ContinuousReader.setOffset to setStartOffset
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the document of `ContinuousReader.setOffset`, we say this method is used to specify the start offset. We also have a `ContinuousReader.getStartOffset` to get the value back. I think it makes more sense to rename `ContinuousReader.setOffset` to `setStartOffset`.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20486 from cloud-fan/rename.
2018-02-02 20:49:08 -08:00
Reynold Xin 3ff83ad43a [SQL] Minor doc update: Add an example in DataFrameReader.schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds a small example to the schema string definition of schema function. It isn't obvious how to use it, so an example would be useful.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A - doc only.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #20491 from rxin/schema-doc.
2018-02-02 20:36:27 -08:00
Wenchen Fan b9503fcbb3 [SPARK-23312][SQL] add a config to turn off vectorized cache reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23309 reported a performance regression about cached table in Spark 2.3. While the investigating is still going on, this PR adds a conf to turn off the vectorized cache reader, to unblock the 2.3 release.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20483 from cloud-fan/cache.
2018-02-02 22:43:28 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 19c7c7ebde [SPARK-23301][SQL] data source column pruning should work for arbitrary expressions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes a mistake in the `PushDownOperatorsToDataSource` rule, the column pruning logic is incorrect about `Project`.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test case for column pruning with arbitrary expressions, and improve the existing tests to make sure the `PushDownOperatorsToDataSource` really works.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20476 from cloud-fan/push-down.
2018-02-01 20:44:46 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 90848d5074 [SPARK-23284][SQL] Document the behavior of several ColumnVector's get APIs when accessing null slot
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For some ColumnVector get APIs such as getDecimal, getBinary, getStruct, getArray, getInterval, getUTF8String, we should clearly document their behaviors when accessing null slot. They should return null in this case. Then we can remove null checks from the places using above APIs.

For the APIs of primitive values like getInt, getInts, etc., this also documents their behaviors when accessing null slots. Their returning values are undefined and can be anything.

## How was this patch tested?

Added tests into `ColumnarBatchSuite`.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #20455 from viirya/SPARK-23272-followup.
2018-02-02 10:18:32 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 73da3b6968 [SPARK-23293][SQL] fix data source v2 self join
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`DataSourceV2Relation` should extend `MultiInstanceRelation`, to take care of self-join.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20466 from cloud-fan/dsv2-selfjoin.
2018-02-01 10:48:34 -08:00
Yuming Wang f051f83403 [SPARK-13983][SQL] Fix HiveThriftServer2 can not get "--hiveconf" and ''--hivevar" variables since 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`--hiveconf` and `--hivevar` variables no longer work since Spark 2.0. The `spark-sql` client has fixed by [SPARK-15730](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15730) and [SPARK-18086](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18086). but `beeline`/[`Spark SQL HiveThriftServer2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v2.1.1/sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2.scala) is still broken. This pull request fix it.

This pull request works for both `JDBC client` and `beeline`.

## How was this patch tested?

unit tests for  `JDBC client`
manual tests for `beeline`:
```
git checkout origin/pr/17886

dev/make-distribution.sh --mvn mvn  --tgz -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Phadoop-2.6 -DskipTests

tar -zxf spark-2.3.0-SNAPSHOT-bin-2.6.5.tgz && cd spark-2.3.0-SNAPSHOT-bin-2.6.5

sbin/start-thriftserver.sh
```
```
cat <<EOF > test.sql
select '\${a}', '\${b}';
EOF

beeline -u jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000 --hiveconf a=avalue --hivevar b=bvalue -f test.sql

```

Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>

Closes #17886 from wangyum/SPARK-13983-dev.
2018-02-01 10:36:31 -08:00
Wang Gengliang ffbca84519 [SPARK-23202][SQL] Add new API in DataSourceWriter: onDataWriterCommit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The current DataSourceWriter API makes it hard to implement `onTaskCommit(taskCommit: TaskCommitMessage)` in `FileCommitProtocol`.
In general, on receiving commit message, driver can start processing messages(e.g. persist messages into files) before all the messages are collected.

The proposal to add a new API:
`add(WriterCommitMessage message)`:  Handles a commit message on receiving from a successful data writer.

This should make the whole API of DataSourceWriter compatible with `FileCommitProtocol`, and more flexible.

There was another radical attempt in #20386.  This one should be more reasonable.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>

Closes #20454 from gengliangwang/write_api.
2018-02-01 20:39:15 +08:00
Takuya UESHIN 89e8d556b9 [SPARK-23280][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Enable MutableColumnarRow.getMap().
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup pr of #20450.
We should've enabled `MutableColumnarRow.getMap()` as well.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>

Closes #20471 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23280/fup2.
2018-02-01 21:28:53 +09:00
Takuya UESHIN 8bb70b068e [SPARK-23280][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix Java style check issues.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #20450 which broke lint-java checks.
This pr fixes the lint-java issues.

```
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/vectorized/ColumnVector.java:[20,8] (imports) UnusedImports: Unused import - org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.MapData.
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/vectorized/ColumnarArray.java:[21,8] (imports) UnusedImports: Unused import - org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.MapData.
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/vectorized/ColumnarRow.java:[22,8] (imports) UnusedImports: Unused import - org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.MapData.
```

## How was this patch tested?

Checked manually in my local environment.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>

Closes #20468 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23280/fup1.
2018-02-01 21:25:02 +09:00
Xingbo Jiang b6b50efc85 [SQL][MINOR] Inline SpecifiedWindowFrame.defaultWindowFrame().
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

SpecifiedWindowFrame.defaultWindowFrame(hasOrderSpecification, acceptWindowFrame) was designed to handle the cases when some Window functions don't support setting a window frame (e.g. rank). However this param is never used.

We may inline the whole of this function to simplify the code.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20463 from jiangxb1987/defaultWindowFrame.
2018-01-31 20:59:19 -08:00
Xingbo Jiang cc41245fa3 [SPARK-23188][SQL] Make vectorized columar reader batch size configurable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR include the following changes:
- Make the capacity of `VectorizedParquetRecordReader` configurable;
- Make the capacity of `OrcColumnarBatchReader` configurable;
- Update the error message when required capacity in writable columnar vector cannot be fulfilled.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20361 from jiangxb1987/vectorCapacity.
2018-02-01 12:56:07 +08:00
Atallah Hezbor b2e7677f4d [SPARK-21396][SQL] Fixes MatchError when UDTs are passed through Hive Thriftserver
Signed-off-by: Atallah Hezbor <atallahhezborgmail.com>

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes modifying the match statement that gets the columns of a row in HiveThriftServer. There was previously no case for `UserDefinedType`, so querying a table that contained them would throw a match error. The changes catch that case and return the string representation.

## How was this patch tested?

While I would have liked to add a unit test, I couldn't easily incorporate UDTs into the ``HiveThriftServer2Suites`` pipeline. With some guidance I would be happy to push a commit with tests.

Instead I did a manual test by loading a `DataFrame` with Point UDT in a spark shell with a HiveThriftServer. Then in beeline, connecting to the server and querying that table.

Here is the result before the change
```
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000> select * from chicago;
Error: scala.MatchError: org.apache.spark.sql.PointUDT2d980dc3 (of class org.apache.spark.sql.PointUDT) (state=,code=0)

```

And after the change:
```
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000> select * from chicago;
+---------------------------------------+--------------+------------------------+---------------------+--+
|                __fid__                | case_number  |          dtg           |        geom         |
+---------------------------------------+--------------+------------------------+---------------------+--+
| 109602f9-54f8-414b-8c6f-42b1a337643e  | 2            | 2016-01-01 19:00:00.0  | POINT (-77 38)      |
| 709602f9-fcff-4429-8027-55649b6fd7ed  | 1            | 2015-12-31 19:00:00.0  | POINT (-76.5 38.5)  |
| 009602f9-fcb5-45b1-a867-eb8ba10cab40  | 3            | 2016-01-02 19:00:00.0  | POINT (-78 39)      |
+---------------------------------------+--------------+------------------------+---------------------+--+
```

Author: Atallah Hezbor <atallahhezbor@gmail.com>

Closes #20385 from atallahhezbor/udts_over_hive.
2018-01-31 20:45:55 -08:00
Wang Gengliang 56ae32657e [SPARK-23268][SQL] Reorganize packages in data source V2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. create a new package for partitioning/distribution related classes.
    As Spark will add new concrete implementations of `Distribution` in new releases, it is good to
    have a new package for partitioning/distribution related classes.

2. move streaming related class to package `org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.reader/writer.streaming`, instead of `org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.streaming.reader/writer`.
So that the there won't be package reader/writer inside package streaming, which is quite confusing.
Before change:
```
v2
├── reader
├── streaming
│   ├── reader
│   └── writer
└── writer
```

After change:
```
v2
├── reader
│   └── streaming
└── writer
    └── streaming
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.

Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>

Closes #20435 from gengliangwang/new_pkg.
2018-01-31 20:33:51 -08:00
caoxuewen 2ac895be90 [SPARK-23247][SQL] combines Unsafe operations and statistics operations in Scan Data Source
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, we scan the execution plan of the data source, first the unsafe operation of each row of data, and then re traverse the data for the count of rows. In terms of performance, this is not necessary. this PR combines the two operations and makes statistics on the number of rows while performing the unsafe operation.

Before modified,

```
val unsafeRow = rdd.mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal { (index, iter) =>
val proj = UnsafeProjection.create(schema)
 proj.initialize(index)
iter.map(proj)
}

val numOutputRows = longMetric("numOutputRows")
unsafeRow.map { r =>
numOutputRows += 1
 r
}
```
After modified,

    val numOutputRows = longMetric("numOutputRows")

    rdd.mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal { (index, iter) =>
      val proj = UnsafeProjection.create(schema)
      proj.initialize(index)
      iter.map( r => {
        numOutputRows += 1
        proj(r)
      })
    }

## How was this patch tested?

the existed test cases.

Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20415 from heary-cao/DataSourceScanExec.
2018-02-01 12:05:12 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 52e00f7066 [SPARK-23280][SQL] add map type support to ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fill the last missing piece of `ColumnVector`: the map type support.

The idea is similar to the array type support. A map is basically 2 arrays: keys and values. We ask the implementations to provide a key array, a value array, and an offset and length to specify the range of this map in the key/value array.

In `WritableColumnVector`, we put the key array in first child vector, and value array in second child vector, and offsets and lengths in the current vector, which is very similar to how array type is implemented here.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20450 from cloud-fan/map.
2018-02-01 11:56:06 +08:00
Dilip Biswal 9ff1d96f01 [SPARK-23281][SQL] Query produces results in incorrect order when a composite order by clause refers to both original columns and aliases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Here is the test snippet.
``` SQL
scala> Seq[(Integer, Integer)](
     |         (1, 1),
     |         (1, 3),
     |         (2, 3),
     |         (3, 3),
     |         (4, null),
     |         (5, null)
     |       ).toDF("key", "value").createOrReplaceTempView("src")

scala> sql(
     |         """
     |           |SELECT MAX(value) as value, key as col2
     |           |FROM src
     |           |GROUP BY key
     |           |ORDER BY value desc, key
     |         """.stripMargin).show
+-----+----+
|value|col2|
+-----+----+
|    3|   3|
|    3|   2|
|    3|   1|
| null|   5|
| null|   4|
+-----+----+
```SQL
Here is the explain output :

```SQL
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Sort ['value DESC NULLS LAST, 'key ASC NULLS FIRST], true
+- 'Aggregate ['key], ['MAX('value) AS value#9, 'key AS col2#10]
   +- 'UnresolvedRelation `src`

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: int, col2: int
Project [value#9, col2#10]
+- Sort [value#9 DESC NULLS LAST, col2#10 DESC NULLS LAST], true
   +- Aggregate [key#5], [max(value#6) AS value#9, key#5 AS col2#10]
      +- SubqueryAlias src
         +- Project [_1#2 AS key#5, _2#3 AS value#6]
            +- LocalRelation [_1#2, _2#3]
``` SQL
The sort direction is being wrongly changed from ASC to DSC while resolving ```Sort``` in
resolveAggregateFunctions.

The above testcase models TPCDS-Q71 and thus we have the same issue in Q71 as well.

## How was this patch tested?
A few tests are added in SQLQuerySuite.

Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>

Closes #20453 from dilipbiswal/local_spark.
2018-01-31 13:52:47 -08:00
Glen Takahashi 8c21170dec [SPARK-23249][SQL] Improved block merging logic for partitions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Change DataSourceScanExec so that when grouping blocks together into partitions, also checks the end of the sorted list of splits to more efficiently fill out partitions.

## How was this patch tested?

Updated old test to reflect the new logic, which causes the # of partitions to drop from 4 -> 3
Also, a current test exists to test large non-splittable files at c575977a59/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategySuite.scala (L346)

## Rationale

The current bin-packing method of next-fit descending for blocks into partitions is sub-optimal in a lot of cases and will result in extra partitions, un-even distribution of block-counts across partitions, and un-even distribution of partition sizes.

As an example, 128 files ranging from 1MB, 2MB,...127MB,128MB. will result in 82 partitions with the current algorithm, but only 64 using this algorithm. Also in this example, the max # of blocks per partition in NFD is 13, while in this algorithm is is 2.

More generally, running a simulation of 1000 runs using 128MB blocksize, between 1-1000 normally distributed file sizes between 1-500Mb, you can see an improvement of approx 5% reduction of partition counts, and a large reduction in standard deviation of blocks per partition.

This algorithm also runs in O(n) time as NFD does, and in every case is strictly better results than NFD.

Overall, the more even distribution of blocks across partitions and therefore reduced partition counts should result in a small but significant performance increase across the board

Author: Glen Takahashi <gtakahashi@palantir.com>

Closes #20372 from glentakahashi/feature/improved-block-merging.
2018-02-01 01:14:01 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 48dd6a4c79 revert [SPARK-22785][SQL] remove ColumnVector.anyNullsSet
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19980 , we thought `anyNullsSet` can be simply implemented by `numNulls() > 0`. This is logically true, but may have performance problems.

`OrcColumnVector` is an example. It doesn't have the `numNulls` property, only has a `noNulls` property. We will lose a lot of performance if we use `numNulls() > 0` to check null.

This PR simply revert #19980, with a renaming to call it `hasNull`. Better name suggestions are welcome, e.g. `nullable`?

## How was this patch tested?

existing test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20452 from cloud-fan/null.
2018-02-01 00:24:42 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 695f7146bc [SPARK-23272][SQL] add calendar interval type support to ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`ColumnVector` is aimed to support all the data types, but `CalendarIntervalType` is missing. Actually we do support interval type for inner fields, e.g. `ColumnarRow`, `ColumnarArray` both support interval type. It's weird if we don't support interval type at the top level.

This PR adds the interval type support.

This PR also makes `ColumnVector.getChild` protect. We need it public because `MutableColumnaRow.getInterval` needs it. Now the interval implementation is in `ColumnVector.getInterval`.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20438 from cloud-fan/interval.
2018-01-31 15:13:15 +08:00
jerryshao 8c6a9c90a3 [SPARK-23279][SS] Avoid triggering distributed job for Console sink
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Console sink will redistribute collected local data and trigger a distributed job in each batch, this is not necessary, so here change to local job.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing UT and manual verification.

Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>

Closes #20447 from jerryshao/console-minor.
2018-01-31 13:59:21 +08:00
gatorsmile ca04c3ff23 [SPARK-23274][SQL] Fix ReplaceExceptWithFilter when the right's Filter contains the references that are not in the left output
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the `ReplaceExceptWithFilter` rule when the right's Filter contains the references that are not in the left output.

Before this PR, we got the error like
```
java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: a
  at scala.collection.MapLike$class.default(MapLike.scala:228)
  at scala.collection.AbstractMap.default(Map.scala:59)
  at scala.collection.MapLike$class.apply(MapLike.scala:141)
  at scala.collection.AbstractMap.apply(Map.scala:59)
```

After this PR, `ReplaceExceptWithFilter ` will not take an effect in this case.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20444 from gatorsmile/fixReplaceExceptWithFilter.
2018-01-30 20:05:57 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 7786616733 [SPARK-23276][SQL][TEST] Enable UDT tests in (Hive)OrcHadoopFsRelationSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Like Parquet, ORC test suites should enable UDT tests.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with newly enabled test cases.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20440 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23276.
2018-01-30 17:14:17 -08:00
Dilip Biswal 58fcb5a95e [SPARK-23275][SQL] hive/tests have been failing when run locally on the laptop (Mac) with OOM
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
hive tests have been failing when they are run locally (Mac Os) after a recent change in the trunk. After running the tests for some time, the test fails with OOM with Error: unable to create new native thread.

I noticed the thread count goes all the way up to 2000+ after which we start getting these OOM errors. Most of the threads seem to be related to the connection pool in hive metastore (BoneCP-xxxxx-xxxx ). This behaviour change is happening after we made the following change to HiveClientImpl.reset()

``` SQL
 def reset(): Unit = withHiveState {
    try {
      // code
    } finally {
      runSqlHive("USE default")  ===> this is causing the issue
    }
```
I am proposing to temporarily back-out part of a fix made to address SPARK-23000 to resolve this issue while we work-out the exact reason for this sudden increase in thread counts.

## How was this patch tested?
Ran hive/test multiple times in different machines.

(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>

Closes #20441 from dilipbiswal/hive_tests.
2018-01-30 14:11:06 -08:00
gatorsmile 31c00ad8b0 [SPARK-23267][SQL] Increase spark.sql.codegen.hugeMethodLimit to 65535
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Still saw the performance regression introduced by `spark.sql.codegen.hugeMethodLimit` in our internal workloads. There are two major issues in the current solution.
- The size of the complied byte code is not identical to the bytecode size of the method. The detection is still not accurate.
- The bytecode size of a single operator (e.g., `SerializeFromObject`) could still exceed 8K limit. We saw the performance regression in such scenario.

Since it is close to the release of 2.3, we decide to increase it to 64K for avoiding the perf regression.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20434 from gatorsmile/revertConf.
2018-01-30 11:33:30 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 84bcf9dc88 [SPARK-23222][SQL] Make DataFrameRangeSuite not flaky
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It is reported that the test `Cancelling stage in a query with Range` in `DataFrameRangeSuite` fails a few times in unrelated PRs. I personally also saw it too in my PR.

This test is not very flaky actually but only fails occasionally. Based on how the test works, I guess that is because `range` finishes before the listener calls `cancelStage`.

I increase the range number from `1000000000L` to `100000000000L` and count the range in one partition. I also reduce the `interval` of checking stage id. Hopefully it can make the test not flaky anymore.

## How was this patch tested?

The modified tests.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #20431 from viirya/SPARK-23222.
2018-01-30 21:00:29 +08:00
gatorsmile 7a2ada223e [SPARK-23261][PYSPARK] Rename Pandas UDFs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename the public APIs and names of pandas udfs.

- `PANDAS SCALAR UDF` -> `SCALAR PANDAS UDF`
- `PANDAS GROUP MAP UDF` -> `GROUPED MAP PANDAS UDF`
- `PANDAS GROUP AGG UDF` -> `GROUPED AGG PANDAS UDF`

## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20428 from gatorsmile/renamePandasUDFs.
2018-01-30 21:55:55 +09:00
Wenchen Fan 0a9ac0248b [SPARK-23260][SPARK-23262][SQL] several data source v2 naming cleanup
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

All other classes in the reader/writer package doesn't have `V2` in their names, and the streaming reader/writer don't have `V2` either. It's more consistent to remove `V2` from `DataSourceV2Reader` and `DataSourceVWriter`.

Also rename `DataSourceV2Option` to remote the `V2`, we should only have `V2` in the root interface: `DataSourceV2`.

This PR also fixes some places that the mix-in interface doesn't extend the interface it aimed to mix in.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20427 from cloud-fan/ds-v2.
2018-01-30 19:43:17 +08:00
Henry Robinson 8b983243e4 [SPARK-23157][SQL] Explain restriction on column expression in withColumn()
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It's not obvious from the comments that any added column must be a
function of the dataset that we are adding it to. Add a comment to
that effect to Scala, Python and R Data* methods.

Author: Henry Robinson <henry@cloudera.com>

Closes #20429 from henryr/SPARK-23157.
2018-01-29 22:19:59 -08:00
Xingbo Jiang b375397b16 [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Don't perform local sort for DataFrame.repartition(1)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In `ShuffleExchangeExec`, we don't need to insert extra local sort before round-robin partitioning, if the new partitioning has only 1 partition, because under that case all output rows go to the same partition.

## How was this patch tested?

The existing test cases.

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20426 from jiangxb1987/repartition1.
2018-01-30 11:40:42 +08:00
Bryan Cutler f235df66a4 [SPARK-22221][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Externalize spark.sql.execution.arrow.maxRecordsPerBatch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup to #19575 which added a section on setting max Arrow record batches and this will externalize the conf that was referenced in the docs.

## How was this patch tested?
NA

Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>

Closes #20423 from BryanCutler/arrow-user-doc-externalize-maxRecordsPerBatch-SPARK-22221.
2018-01-29 17:37:55 -08:00
gatorsmile e30b34f7bd [SPARK-22916][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Update the Description of Join Selection
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to update the description of the join algorithm changes.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20420 from gatorsmile/followUp22916.
2018-01-29 10:29:42 -08:00
Herman van Hovell 2d903cf9d3 [SPARK-23223][SQL] Make stacking dataset transforms more performant
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is a common pattern to apply multiple transforms to a `Dataset` (using `Dataset.withColumn` for example. This is currently quite expensive because we run `CheckAnalysis` on the full plan and create an encoder for each intermediate `Dataset`.

This PR extends the usage of the `AnalysisBarrier` to include `CheckAnalysis`. By doing this we hide the already analyzed plan  from `CheckAnalysis` because barrier is a `LeafNode`. The `AnalysisBarrier` is in the `FinishAnalysis` phase of the optimizer.

We also make binding the `Dataset` encoder lazy. The bound encoder is only needed when we materialize the dataset.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing test should cover this.

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #20402 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23223.
2018-01-29 09:00:54 -08:00
xubo245 fbce2ed0fa [SPARK-23059][SQL][TEST] Correct some improper with view related method usage
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Correct some improper with view related method usage
Only change test cases

like:

```
 test("list global temp views") {
    try {
      sql("CREATE GLOBAL TEMP VIEW v1 AS SELECT 3, 4")
      sql("CREATE TEMP VIEW v2 AS SELECT 1, 2")

      checkAnswer(sql(s"SHOW TABLES IN $globalTempDB"),
        Row(globalTempDB, "v1", true) ::
        Row("", "v2", true) :: Nil)

      assert(spark.catalog.listTables(globalTempDB).collect().toSeq.map(_.name) == Seq("v1", "v2"))
    } finally {
      spark.catalog.dropTempView("v1")
      spark.catalog.dropGlobalTempView("v2")
    }
  }
```

other change please review the code.
## How was this patch tested?

See test case.

Author: xubo245 <601450868@qq.com>

Closes #20250 from xubo245/DropTempViewError.
2018-01-29 08:58:14 -08:00
caoxuewen 54dd7cf4ef [SPARK-23199][SQL] improved Removes repetition from group expressions in Aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, all Aggregate operations will go into RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions, but there is no group expression or there is no duplicate group expression in group expression, we not need copy for logic plan.

## How was this patch tested?

the existed test case.

Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20375 from heary-cao/RepetitionGroupExpressions.
2018-01-29 08:56:42 -08:00
Wang Gengliang badf0d0e0d [SPARK-23219][SQL] Rename ReadTask to DataReaderFactory in data source v2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently we have `ReadTask` in data source v2 reader, while in writer we have `DataWriterFactory`.
To make the naming consistent and better, renaming `ReadTask` to `DataReaderFactory`.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>

Closes #20397 from gengliangwang/rename.
2018-01-30 00:50:49 +08:00
hyukjinkwon 39d2c6b034 [SPARK-23238][SQL] Externalize SQLConf configurations exposed in documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to expose few internal configurations found in the documentation.

Also it fixes the description for `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled`.
It's quite self-explanatory.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20403 from HyukjinKwon/minor-doc-arrow.
2018-01-29 21:09:05 +09:00
Jose Torres 49b0207dc9 [SPARK-23196] Unify continuous and microbatch V2 sinks
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Replace streaming V2 sinks with a unified StreamWriteSupport interface, with a shim to use it with microbatch execution.

Add a new SQL config to use for disabling V2 sinks, falling back to the V1 sink implementation.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests, which in the case of Kafka (the only existing continuous V2 sink) now use V2 for microbatch.

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20369 from jose-torres/streaming-sink.
2018-01-29 13:10:38 +08:00
CCInCharge 686a622c93 [SPARK-23250][DOCS] Typo in JavaDoc/ScalaDoc for DataFrameWriter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix typo in ScalaDoc for DataFrameWriter - originally stated "This is applicable for all file-based data sources (e.g. Parquet, JSON) staring Spark 2.1.0", should be "starting with Spark 2.1.0".

## How was this patch tested?

Check of correct spelling in ScalaDoc

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: CCInCharge <charles.l.chen.clc@gmail.com>

Closes #20417 from CCInCharge/master.
2018-01-28 14:55:43 -06:00
Jose Torres 6328868e52 [SPARK-23245][SS][TESTS] Don't access lastExecution.executedPlan in StreamTest
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`lastExecution.executedPlan` is lazy val so accessing it in StreamTest may need to acquire the lock of `lastExecution`. It may be waiting forever when the streaming thread is holding it and running a continuous Spark job.

This PR changes to check if `s.lastExecution` is null to avoid accessing `lastExecution.executedPlan`.

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins

Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>

Closes #20413 from zsxwing/SPARK-23245.
2018-01-26 23:06:03 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun e7bc9f0524 [MINOR][SS][DOC] Fix Trigger Scala/Java doc examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes Scala/Java doc examples in `Trigger.java`.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20401 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-TRIGGER.
2018-01-26 18:57:32 -06:00
Wenchen Fan 5b5447c68a [SPARK-23214][SQL] cached data should not carry extra hint info
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a regression introduced by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19864

When we lookup cache, we should not carry the hint info, as this cache entry might be added by a plan having hint info, while the input plan for this lookup may not have hint info, or have different hint info.

## How was this patch tested?

a new test.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20394 from cloud-fan/cache.
2018-01-26 16:46:51 -08:00
Xingbo Jiang 94c67a76ec [SPARK-23207][SQL] Shuffle+Repartition on a DataFrame could lead to incorrect answers
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently shuffle repartition uses RoundRobinPartitioning, the generated result is nondeterministic since the sequence of input rows are not determined.

The bug can be triggered when there is a repartition call following a shuffle (which would lead to non-deterministic row ordering), as the pattern shows below:
upstream stage -> repartition stage -> result stage
(-> indicate a shuffle)
When one of the executors process goes down, some tasks on the repartition stage will be retried and generate inconsistent ordering, and some tasks of the result stage will be retried generating different data.

The following code returns 931532, instead of 1000000:
```
import scala.sys.process._

import org.apache.spark.TaskContext
val res = spark.range(0, 1000 * 1000, 1).repartition(200).map { x =>
  x
}.repartition(200).map { x =>
  if (TaskContext.get.attemptNumber == 0 && TaskContext.get.partitionId < 2) {
    throw new Exception("pkill -f java".!!)
  }
  x
}
res.distinct().count()
```

In this PR, we propose a most straight-forward way to fix this problem by performing a local sort before partitioning, after we make the input row ordering deterministic, the function from rows to partitions is fully deterministic too.

The downside of the approach is that with extra local sort inserted, the performance of repartition() will go down, so we add a new config named `spark.sql.execution.sortBeforeRepartition` to control whether this patch is applied. The patch is default enabled to be safe-by-default, but user may choose to manually turn it off to avoid performance regression.

This patch also changes the output rows ordering of repartition(), that leads to a bunch of test cases failure because they are comparing the results directly.

## How was this patch tested?

Add unit test in ExchangeSuite.

With this patch(and `spark.sql.execution.sortBeforeRepartition` set to true), the following query returns 1000000:
```
import scala.sys.process._

import org.apache.spark.TaskContext

spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.sortBeforeRepartition", "true")

val res = spark.range(0, 1000 * 1000, 1).repartition(200).map { x =>
  x
}.repartition(200).map { x =>
  if (TaskContext.get.attemptNumber == 0 && TaskContext.get.partitionId < 2) {
    throw new Exception("pkill -f java".!!)
  }
  x
}
res.distinct().count()

res7: Long = 1000000
```

Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>

Closes #20393 from jiangxb1987/shuffle-repartition.
2018-01-26 15:01:03 -08:00
Wenchen Fan dd8e257d1c [SPARK-23218][SQL] simplify ColumnVector.getArray
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`ColumnVector` is very flexible about how to implement array type. As a result `ColumnVector` has 3 abstract methods for array type: `arrayData`, `getArrayOffset`, `getArrayLength`. For example, in `WritableColumnVector` we use the first child vector as the array data vector, and store offsets and lengths in 2 arrays in the parent vector. `ArrowColumnVector` has a different implementation.

This PR simplifies `ColumnVector` by using only one abstract method for array type: `getArray`.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

rerun `ColumnarBatchBenchmark`, there is no performance regression.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20395 from cloud-fan/vector.
2018-01-26 09:17:05 -08:00
Kris Mok e57f394818 [SPARK-23032][SQL] Add a per-query codegenStageId to WholeStageCodegenExec
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

**Proposal**

Add a per-query ID to the codegen stages as represented by `WholeStageCodegenExec` operators. This ID will be used in
-  the explain output of the physical plan, and in
- the generated class name.

Specifically, this ID will be stable within a query, counting up from 1 in depth-first post-order for all the `WholeStageCodegenExec` inserted into a plan.
The ID value 0 is reserved for "free-floating" `WholeStageCodegenExec` objects, which may have been created for one-off purposes, e.g. for fallback handling of codegen stages that failed to codegen the whole stage and wishes to codegen a subset of the children operators (as seen in `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec#doExecute`).

Example: for the following query:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold", 1)

scala> val df1 = spark.range(10).select('id as 'x, 'id + 1 as 'y).orderBy('x).select('x + 1 as 'z, 'y)
df1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [z: bigint, y: bigint]

scala> val df2 = spark.range(5)
df2: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Long] = [id: bigint]

scala> val query = df1.join(df2, 'z === 'id)
query: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [z: bigint, y: bigint ... 1 more field]
```

The explain output before the change is:
```scala
scala> query.explain
== Physical Plan ==
*SortMergeJoin [z#9L], [id#13L], Inner
:- *Sort [z#9L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
:  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(z#9L, 200)
:     +- *Project [(x#3L + 1) AS z#9L, y#4L]
:        +- *Sort [x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
:           +- Exchange rangepartitioning(x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
:              +- *Project [id#0L AS x#3L, (id#0L + 1) AS y#4L]
:                 +- *Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=8)
+- *Sort [id#13L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
   +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#13L, 200)
      +- *Range (0, 5, step=1, splits=8)
```
Note how codegen'd operators are annotated with a prefix `"*"`. See how the `SortMergeJoin` operator and its direct children `Sort` operators are adjacent and all annotated with the `"*"`, so it's hard to tell they're actually in separate codegen stages.

and after this change it'll be:
```scala
scala> query.explain
== Physical Plan ==
*(6) SortMergeJoin [z#9L], [id#13L], Inner
:- *(3) Sort [z#9L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
:  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(z#9L, 200)
:     +- *(2) Project [(x#3L + 1) AS z#9L, y#4L]
:        +- *(2) Sort [x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
:           +- Exchange rangepartitioning(x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
:              +- *(1) Project [id#0L AS x#3L, (id#0L + 1) AS y#4L]
:                 +- *(1) Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=8)
+- *(5) Sort [id#13L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
   +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#13L, 200)
      +- *(4) Range (0, 5, step=1, splits=8)
```
Note that the annotated prefix becomes `"*(id) "`. See how the `SortMergeJoin` operator and its direct children `Sort` operators have different codegen stage IDs.

It'll also show up in the name of the generated class, as a suffix in the format of `GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$id`.

For example, note how `GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage3` and `GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6` in the following stack trace corresponds to the IDs shown in the explain output above:
```
"Executor task launch worker for task 42412957" daemon prio=5 tid=0x58 nid=NA runnable
  java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeExternalRowSorter.insertRow(UnsafeExternalRowSorter.java:109)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage3.sort_addToSorter$(generated.java:32)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage3.processNext(generated.java:41)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$9$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:494)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.findNextInnerJoinRows$(generated.java:42)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.processNext(generated.java:101)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$11$$anon$2.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:513)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$2.apply(SparkPlan.scala:253)
	  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$2.apply(SparkPlan.scala:247)
	  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$25.apply(RDD.scala:828)
	  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$25.apply(RDD.scala:828)
	  at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
	  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
	  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
	  at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:87)
	  at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
	  at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
	  at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
	  at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
	  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```

**Rationale**

Right now, the codegen from Spark SQL lacks the means to differentiate between a couple of things:

1. It's hard to tell which physical operators are in the same WholeStageCodegen stage. Note that this "stage" is a separate notion from Spark's RDD execution stages; this one is only to delineate codegen units.
There can be adjacent physical operators that are both codegen'd but are in separate codegen stages. Some of this is due to hacky implementation details, such as the case with `SortMergeJoin` and its `Sort` inputs -- they're hard coded to be split into separate stages although both are codegen'd.
When printing out the explain output of the physical plan, you'd only see the codegen'd physical operators annotated with a preceding star (`'*'`) but would have no way to figure out if they're in the same stage.

2. Performance/error diagnosis
The generated code has class/method names that are hard to differentiate between queries or even between codegen stages within the same query. If we use a Java-level profiler to collect profiles, or if we encounter a Java-level exception with a stack trace in it, it's really hard to tell which part of a query it's at.
By introducing a per-query codegen stage ID, we'd at least be able to know which codegen stage (and in turn, which group of physical operators) was a profile tick or an exception happened.

The reason why this proposal uses a per-query ID is because it's stable within a query, so that multiple runs of the same query will see the same resulting IDs. This both benefits understandability for users, and also it plays well with the codegen cache in Spark SQL which uses the generated source code as the key.

The downside to using per-query IDs as opposed to a per-session or globally incrementing ID is of course we can't tell apart different query runs with this ID alone. But for now I believe this is a good enough tradeoff.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests. This PR does not involve any runtime behavior changes other than some name changes.
The SQL query test suites that compares explain outputs have been updates to ignore the newly added `codegenStageId`.

Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>

Closes #20224 from rednaxelafx/wsc-codegenstageid.
2018-01-25 16:11:33 -08:00
Huaxin Gao 8480c0c576 [SPARK-23081][PYTHON] Add colRegex API to PySpark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add colRegex API to PySpark

## How was this patch tested?

add a test in sql/tests.py

Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>

Closes #20390 from huaxingao/spark-23081.
2018-01-26 07:50:48 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh d20bbc2d87 [SPARK-21717][SQL] Decouple consume functions of physical operators in whole-stage codegen
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It has been observed in SPARK-21603 that whole-stage codegen suffers performance degradation, if the generated functions are too long to be optimized by JIT.

We basically produce a single function to incorporate generated codes from all physical operators in whole-stage. Thus, it is possibly to grow the size of generated function over a threshold that we can't have JIT optimization for it anymore.

This patch is trying to decouple the logic of consuming rows in physical operators to avoid a giant function processing rows.

## How was this patch tested?

Added tests.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #18931 from viirya/SPARK-21717.
2018-01-25 19:49:58 +08:00
Herman van Hovell e29b08add9 [SPARK-23208][SQL] Fix code generation for complex create array (related) expressions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `GenArrayData.genCodeToCreateArrayData` produces illegal java code when code splitting is enabled. This is used in `CreateArray` and `CreateMap` expressions for complex object arrays.

This issue is caused by a typo.

## How was this patch tested?
Added a regression test in `complexTypesSuite`.

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #20391 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23208.
2018-01-25 16:40:41 +08:00
caoxuewen 6f0ba8472d [MINOR][SQL] add new unit test to LimitPushdown
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is repaired as follows
1、update y -> x in "left outer join" test case ,maybe is mistake.
2、add a new test case:"left outer join and left sides are limited"
3、add a new test case:"left outer join and right sides are limited"
4、add a new test case: "right outer join and right sides are limited"
5、add a new test case: "right outer join and left sides are limited"
6、Remove annotations without code implementation

## How was this patch tested?

add new unit test case.

Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20381 from heary-cao/LimitPushdownSuite.
2018-01-24 13:06:09 -08:00
zuotingbing bbb87b350d [SPARK-22837][SQL] Session timeout checker does not work in SessionManager.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently we do not call the `super.init(hiveConf)` in `SparkSQLSessionManager.init`. So we do not load the config `HIVE_SERVER2_SESSION_CHECK_INTERVAL HIVE_SERVER2_IDLE_SESSION_TIMEOUT HIVE_SERVER2_IDLE_SESSION_CHECK_OPERATION` , which cause the session timeout checker does not work.

## How was this patch tested?

manual tests

Author: zuotingbing <zuo.tingbing9@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20025 from zuotingbing/SPARK-22837.
2018-01-24 10:07:24 -08:00
Henry Robinson de36f65d3a [SPARK-23148][SQL] Allow pathnames with special characters for CSV / JSON / text
…JSON / text

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix for JSON and CSV data sources when file names include characters
that would be changed by URL encoding.

## How was this patch tested?

New unit tests for JSON, CSV and text suites

Author: Henry Robinson <henry@cloudera.com>

Closes #20355 from henryr/spark-23148.
2018-01-24 21:19:09 +09:00
gatorsmile 4e7b49041a Revert "[SPARK-23195][SQL] Keep the Hint of Cached Data"
This reverts commit 44cc4daf3a.
2018-01-23 22:38:20 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh a3911cf896 [SPARK-23177][SQL][PYSPARK] Extract zero-parameter UDFs from aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We extract Python UDFs in logical aggregate which depends on aggregate expression or grouping key in ExtractPythonUDFFromAggregate rule. But Python UDFs which don't depend on above expressions should also be extracted to avoid the issue reported in the JIRA.

A small code snippet to reproduce that issue looks like:
```python
import pyspark.sql.functions as f

df = spark.createDataFrame([(1,2), (3,4)])
f_udf = f.udf(lambda: str("const_str"))
df2 = df.distinct().withColumn("a", f_udf())
df2.show()
```

Error exception is raised as:
```
: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: pythonUDF0#50
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:56)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:91)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:90)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$2.apply(TreeNode.scala:267)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$2.apply(TreeNode.scala:267)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:70)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:266)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:272)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:272)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:306)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:187)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapChildren(TreeNode.scala:304)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:272)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:256)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:90)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec$$anonfun$38.apply(HashAggregateExec.scala:514)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec$$anonfun$38.apply(HashAggregateExec.scala:513)
```

This exception raises because `HashAggregateExec` tries to bind the aliased Python UDF expression (e.g., `pythonUDF0#50 AS a#44`) to grouping key.

## How was this patch tested?

Added test.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #20360 from viirya/SPARK-23177.
2018-01-24 11:43:48 +09:00
gatorsmile 44cc4daf3a [SPARK-23195][SQL] Keep the Hint of Cached Data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The broadcast hint of the cached plan is lost if we cache the plan. This PR is to correct it.

```Scala
  val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "4"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
  val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "1"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
  broadcast(df2).cache()
  df2.collect()
  val df3 = df1.join(df2, Seq("key"), "inner")
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added a test.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20368 from gatorsmile/cachedBroadcastHint.
2018-01-23 16:17:09 -08:00
gatorsmile 613c290336 [SPARK-23192][SQL] Keep the Hint after Using Cached Data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The hint of the plan segment is lost, if the plan segment is replaced by the cached data.

```Scala
      val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "4"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
      val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "1"), (2, "2"))).toDF("key", "value")
      df2.cache()
      val df3 = df1.join(broadcast(df2), Seq("key"), "inner")
```

This PR is to fix it.

## How was this patch tested?
Added a test

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20365 from gatorsmile/fixBroadcastHintloss.
2018-01-23 14:56:28 -08:00
Marcelo Vanzin dc4761fd8f [SPARK-17088][HIVE] Fix 'sharesHadoopClasses' option when creating client.
Because the call to the constructor of HiveClientImpl crosses class loader
boundaries, different versions of the same class (Configuration in this
case) were loaded, and that caused a runtime error when instantiating the
client. By using a safer type in the signature of the constructor, it's
possible to avoid the problem.

I considered removing 'sharesHadoopClasses', but it may still be desired
(even though there are 0 users of it since it was not working). When Spark
starts to support Hadoop 3, it may be necessary to use that option to
load clients for older Hive metastore versions that don't know about
Hadoop 3.

Tested with added unit test.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #20169 from vanzin/SPARK-17088.
2018-01-23 12:51:40 -08:00
gatorsmile ee572ba8c1 [SPARK-20749][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Override prettyName for bit_length and octet_length
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We need to override the prettyName for bit_length and octet_length for getting the expected auto-generated alias name.

## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20358 from gatorsmile/test2.3More.
2018-01-23 21:36:20 +09:00
Li Jin b2ce17b4c9 [SPARK-22274][PYTHON][SQL] User-defined aggregation functions with pandas udf (full shuffle)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add support for using pandas UDFs with groupby().agg().

This PR introduces a new type of pandas UDF - group aggregate pandas UDF. This type of UDF defines a transformation of multiple pandas Series -> a scalar value. Group aggregate pandas UDFs can be used with groupby().agg(). Note group aggregate pandas UDF doesn't support partial aggregation, i.e., a full shuffle is required.

This PR doesn't support group aggregate pandas UDFs that return ArrayType, StructType or MapType. Support for these types is left for future PR.

## How was this patch tested?

GroupbyAggPandasUDFTests

Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>

Closes #19872 from icexelloss/SPARK-22274-groupby-agg.
2018-01-23 14:11:30 +09:00
Wenchen Fan 51eb750263 [SPARK-22389][SQL] data source v2 partitioning reporting interface
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

a new interface which allows data source to report partitioning and avoid shuffle at Spark side.

The design is pretty like the internal distribution/partitioing framework. Spark defines a `Distribution` interfaces and several concrete implementations, and ask the data source to report a `Partitioning`, the `Partitioning` should tell Spark if it can satisfy a `Distribution` or not.

## How was this patch tested?

new test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20201 from cloud-fan/partition-reporting.
2018-01-22 15:21:09 -08:00
Jacek Laskowski 76b8b840dd [MINOR] Typo fixes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Typo fixes

## How was this patch tested?

Local build / Doc-only changes

Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>

Closes #20344 from jaceklaskowski/typo-fixes.
2018-01-22 13:55:14 -06:00
Wenchen Fan 5d680cae48 [SPARK-23090][SQL] polish ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Several improvements:
* provide a default implementation for the batch get methods
* rename `getChildColumn` to `getChild`, which is more concise
* remove `getStruct(int, int)`, it's only used to simplify the codegen, which is an internal thing, we should not add a public API for this purpose.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20277 from cloud-fan/column-vector.
2018-01-22 20:56:38 +08:00
gatorsmile 896e45af5f [MINOR][SQL][TEST] Test case cleanups for recent PRs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revert the unneeded test case changes we made in SPARK-23000

Also fixes the test suites that do not call `super.afterAll()` in the local `afterAll`. The `afterAll()` of `TestHiveSingleton` actually reset the environments.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20341 from gatorsmile/testRelated.
2018-01-22 04:32:59 -08:00
gatorsmile 78801881c4 [SPARK-23170][SQL] Dump the statistics of effective runs of analyzer and optimizer rules
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Dump the statistics of effective runs of analyzer and optimizer rules.

## How was this patch tested?

Do a manual run of TPCDSQuerySuite

```
=== Metrics of Analyzer/Optimizer Rules ===
Total number of runs: 175899
Total time: 25.486559948 seconds

Rule                                                                                               Effective Time / Total Time                     Effective Runs / Total Runs

org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ColumnPruning                                              1603280450 / 2868461549                         761 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$CTESubstitution                                    2045860009 / 2056602674                         37 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveAggregateFunctions                          440719059 / 1693110949                          38 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.Optimizer$OptimizeSubqueries                               1429834919 / 1446016225                         39 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PruneFilters                                               33273083 / 1389586938                           3 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveReferences                                  821183615 / 1266668754                          616 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin                                                775837028 / 866238225                           132 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.DecimalPrecision                                            550683593 / 748854507                           211 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveSubquery                                    513075345 / 634370596                           49 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$FixNullability                                     33475731 / 606406532                            12 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$ImplicitTypeCasts                              193144298 / 545403925                           86 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.BooleanSimplification                                      18651497 / 495725004                            7 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PushPredicateThroughJoin                                   369257217 / 489934378                           709 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveRedundantAliases                                     3707000 / 468291609                             9 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.InferFiltersFromConstraints                                410155900 / 435254175                           192 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FindDataSourceTable                                     348885539 / 371855866                           233 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.NullPropagation                                            11307645 / 307531225                            26 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveFunctions                                   120324545 / 304948785                           294 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$FunctionArgumentConversion                     92323199 / 286695007                            38 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PushDownPredicate                                          230084193 / 265845972                           785 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$PromoteStrings                                 45938401 / 265144009                            40 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$InConversion                                   14888776 / 261499450                            1 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$CaseWhenCoercion                               113796384 / 244913861                           29 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConstantFolding                                            65008069 / 236548480                            126 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ExtractGenerator                                   0 / 226338929                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveTimeZone                                             98134906 / 221323770                            417 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderAssociativeOperator                                 0 / 208421703                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.OptimizeIn                                                 8762534 / 199351958                             16 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$DateTimeOperations                             11980016 / 190779046                            27 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyBinaryComparison                                   0 / 188887385                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyConditionals                                       0 / 186812106                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCaseConversionExpressions                          0 / 183885230                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCasts                                              17128295 / 182901910                            69 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$Division                                       14579110 / 180309340                            8 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$BooleanEquality                                0 / 176740516                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$IfCoercion                                     0 / 170781986                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.LikeSimplification                                         771605 / 164136736                              1 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveDispensableExpressions                               0 / 155958962                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveCreateNamedStruct                                    0 / 151222943                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveWindowOrder                                 7534632 / 146596355                             14 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$EltCoercion                                    0 / 144488654                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$ConcatCoercion                                 0 / 142403338                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveWindowFrame                                 12067635 / 141500665                            21 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TimeWindowing                                               0 / 140431958                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$WindowFrameCoercion                            0 / 125471960                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateOuterJoin                                         14226972 / 124922019                            11 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$StackCoercion                                  0 / 123613887                                   0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery                            8491071 / 121179056                             7 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveGroupingAnalytics                           55526073 / 120290529                            11 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConstantPropagation                                        0 / 113886790                                   0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveDeserializer                                52383759 / 107160222                            148 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CleanupAliases                                              52543524 / 102091518                            344 / 1086
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveRedundantProject                                     40682895 / 94403652                             342 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ExtractWindowExpressions                           38473816 / 89740578                             23 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseProject                                            46806090 / 83315506                             281 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.FoldablePropagation                                        0 / 78750087                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveAliases                                     13742765 / 77227258                             47 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineFilters                                             53386729 / 76960344                             448 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis                                      68034341 / 75724186                             24 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$LookupFunctions                                    0 / 71151084                                    0 / 750
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveMissingReferences                           12139848 / 67599140                             8 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PullupCorrelatedPredicates                                 45017938 / 65968777                             23 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.v2.PushDownOperatorsToDataSource                        0 / 60937767                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseRepartition                                        0 / 59897237                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PushProjectionThroughUnion                                 8547262 / 53941370                              10 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$HandleNullInputsForUDF                             0 / 52735976                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCoercion$WidenSetOperationTypes                         9797713 / 52401665                              9 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$PullOutNondeterministic                            0 / 51741500                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations                                   28614911 / 51061186                             233 / 1990
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.PruneFileSourcePartitions                               0 / 50621510                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineUnions                                              2777800 / 50262112                              17 / 1877
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$GlobalAggregates                                   1640641 / 49633909                              46 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.DecimalAggregates                                          20198374 / 48488419                             100 / 385
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.LimitPushDown                                              0 / 45052523                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineLimits                                              0 / 44719443                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateSorts                                             0 / 44216930                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewritePredicateSubquery                                   36235699 / 44165786                             148 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveNewInstance                                 0 / 42750307                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast                                      0 / 41811748                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveOrdinalInOrderByAndGroupBy                  3819476 / 41776562                              4 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ComputeCurrentTime                                         0 / 40527808                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseWindow                                             0 / 36832538                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateSerialization                                     0 / 36120667                                    0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveAggAliasInGroupBy                           0 / 32435826                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.PreprocessTableCreation                                 0 / 32145218                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.ResolveSQLOnFile                                        0 / 30295614                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolvePivot                                       0 / 30111655                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.package$ExpressionCanonicalizer$CleanExpressions 59930 / 28038201                                26 / 8280
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveInlineTables                                         0 / 27808108                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveSubqueryColumnAliases                       0 / 27066690                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveGenerate                                    0 / 26660210                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveNaturalAndUsingJoin                         0 / 25255184                                    0 / 1982
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveTableValuedFunctions                                 0 / 24663088                                    0 / 1990
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.SubstituteUnresolvedOrdinals                                9709079 / 24450670                              4 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveHints$ResolveBroadcastHints                          0 / 23776535                                    0 / 750
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceExpressions                                         0 / 22697895                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CheckCartesianProducts                                     0 / 22523798                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceDistinctWithAggregate                               988593 / 21535410                               15 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateMapObjects                                        0 / 20269996                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RewriteDistinctAggregates                                  0 / 19388592                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateSubqueryAliases                                    17675532 / 18971185                             215 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.GetCurrentDatabase                                         0 / 18271152                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.PropagateEmptyRelation                                     2077097 / 17190855                              3 / 288
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateBarriers                                           0 / 16736359                                    0 / 1086
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery                                           0 / 16669341                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.UpdateOuterReferences                                       0 / 14470235                                    0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceExceptWithAntiJoin                                  6715625 / 12190561                              1 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceIntersectWithSemiJoin                               3451793 / 11431432                              7 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFFromAggregate                                0 / 10810568                                    0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions                       344198 / 10475276                               1 / 286
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$WindowsSubstitution                                0 / 10386630                                    0 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateUnions                                             0 / 10096526                                    0 / 788
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.AliasViewChild                                              0 / 9991706                                     0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConvertToLocalRelation                                     0 / 9649334                                     0 / 288
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveHints$RemoveAllHints                                 0 / 8739109                                     0 / 750
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.PreprocessTableInsertion                                0 / 8420889                                     0 / 742
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateView                                               0 / 8319134                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions                          0 / 7392627                                     0 / 286
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceExceptWithFilter                                    0 / 7170516                                     0 / 300
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCreateArrayOps                                     0 / 7109643                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCreateStructOps                                    0 / 6837590                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.SimplifyCreateMapOps                                       0 / 6617848                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineConcats                                             0 / 5768406                                     0 / 1592
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate                            0 / 5349831                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CombineTypedFilters                                        0 / 5186642                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.EliminateDistinct                                          0 / 2427686                                     0 / 285
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CostBasedJoinReorder                                       0 / 2420436                                     0 / 285

```

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20342 from gatorsmile/reportExecution.
2018-01-22 04:31:24 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 8142a3b883 [MINOR][SQL] Fix wrong comments on org.apache.spark.sql.parquet.row.attributes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes the wrong comment on `org.apache.spark.sql.parquet.row.attributes`
which is useful for UDTs like Vector/Matrix. Please see [SPARK-22320](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22320) for the usage.

Originally, [SPARK-19411](bf493686eb (diff-ee26d4c4be21e92e92a02e9f16dbc285L314)) left this behind during removing optional column metadatas. In the same PR, the same comment was removed at line 310-311.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A (This is about comments).

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20346 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_comment_parquet.
2018-01-22 15:18:57 +09:00