## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As reported in the Jira, there are some weird issues with exploding Python UDFs in SparkSQL.
The following test code can reproduce it. Notice: the following test code is reported to return wrong results in the Jira. However, as I tested on master branch, it causes exception and so can't return any result.
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import *
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>>
>>> df = spark.range(10)
>>>
>>> def return_range(value):
... return [(i, str(i)) for i in range(value - 1, value + 1)]
...
>>> range_udf = udf(return_range, ArrayType(StructType([StructField("integer_val", IntegerType()),
... StructField("string_val", StringType())])))
>>>
>>> df.select("id", explode(range_udf(df.id))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 318, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20))
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1133, in __call__
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 319, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o126.showString.: java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CodegenSupport$class.consume(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.consume(GenerateExec.scala:57)
The cause of this issue is, in `ExtractPythonUDFs` we insert `BatchEvalPythonExec` to run PythonUDFs in batch. `BatchEvalPythonExec` will add extra outputs (e.g., `pythonUDF0`) to original plan. In above case, the original `Range` only has one output `id`. After `ExtractPythonUDFs`, the added `BatchEvalPythonExec` has two outputs `id` and `pythonUDF0`.
Because the output of `GenerateExec` is given after analysis phase, in above case, it is the combination of `id`, i.e., the output of `Range`, and `col`. But in planning phase, we change `GenerateExec`'s child plan to `BatchEvalPythonExec` with additional output attributes.
It will cause no problem in non wholestage codegen. Because when evaluating the additional attributes are projected out the final output of `GenerateExec`.
However, as `GenerateExec` now supports wholestage codegen, the framework will input all the outputs of the child plan to `GenerateExec`. Then when consuming `GenerateExec`'s output data (i.e., calling `consume`), the number of output attributes is different to the output variables in wholestage codegen.
To solve this issue, this patch only gives the generator's output to `GenerateExec` after analysis phase. `GenerateExec`'s output is the combination of its child plan's output and the generator's output. So when we change `GenerateExec`'s child, its output is still correct.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16120 from viirya/fix-py-udf-with-generator.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQuery.explain and exception to Python.
- Fix StreamingQueryException to not expose `OffsetSeq`.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16125 from zsxwing/py-streaming-explain.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Makes `Window.unboundedPreceding` and `Window.unboundedFollowing` backward compatible.
## How was this patch tested?
Pyspark SQL unittests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16123 from zero323/SPARK-17845-follow-up.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQueryStatus.json
- Make it not case class (to avoid unnecessarily exposing implicit object StreamingQueryStatus, consistent with StreamingQueryProgress)
- Add StreamingQuery.status to Python
- Fix post-termination status
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16075 from tdas/SPARK-18516-1.
This PR separates the status of a `StreamingQuery` into two separate APIs:
- `status` - describes the status of a `StreamingQuery` at this moment, including what phase of processing is currently happening and if data is available.
- `recentProgress` - an array of statistics about the most recent microbatches that have executed.
A recent progress contains the following information:
```
{
"id" : "2be8670a-fce1-4859-a530-748f29553bb6",
"name" : "query-29",
"timestamp" : 1479705392724,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303,
"durationMs" : {
"triggerExecution" : 276,
"queryPlanning" : 3,
"getBatch" : 5,
"getOffset" : 3,
"addBatch" : 234,
"walCommit" : 30
},
"currentWatermark" : 0,
"stateOperators" : [ ],
"sources" : [ {
"description" : "KafkaSource[Subscribe[topic-14]]",
"startOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 0,
"4" : 1,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 0
}
},
"endOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 1,
"4" : 2,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 1
}
},
"numRecords" : 3,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303
} ]
}
```
Additionally, in order to make it possible to correlate progress updates across restarts, we change the `id` field from an integer that is unique with in the JVM to a `UUID` that is globally unique.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15954 from marmbrus/queryProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a crossJoin function to the DataFrame API similar to that in Scala. Joins with no condition (cartesian products) must be specified with the crossJoin API
## How was this patch tested?
Added python tests to ensure that an AnalysisException if a cartesian product is specified without crossJoin(), and that cartesian products can execute if specified via crossJoin()
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#15493 from srinathshankar/crosspython.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves the window function frame boundary API to make it more obvious to read and to use. The two high level changes are:
1. Create Window.currentRow, Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing to indicate the special values in frame boundaries. These methods map to the special integral values so we are not breaking backward compatibility here. This change makes the frame boundaries more self-evident (instead of Long.MinValue, it becomes Window.unboundedPreceding).
2. In Python, for any value less than or equal to JVM's Long.MinValue, treat it as Window.unboundedPreceding. For any value larger than or equal to JVM's Long.MaxValue, treat it as Window.unboundedFollowing. Before this change, if the user specifies any value that is less than Long.MinValue but not -sys.maxsize (e.g. -sys.maxsize + 1), the number we pass over to the JVM would overflow, resulting in a frame that does not make sense.
Code example required to specify a frame before this patch:
```
Window.rowsBetween(-Long.MinValue, 0)
```
While the above code should still work, the new way is more obvious to read:
```
Window.rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.currentRow)
```
## How was this patch tested?
- Updated DataFrameWindowSuite (for Scala/Java)
- Updated test_window_functions_cumulative_sum (for Python)
- Renamed DataFrameWindowSuite DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite to better reflect its purpose
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15438 from rxin/SPARK-17845.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, the invalid join type will not throw error for the following join:
```df1.join(df2, how='not-a-valid-join-type')```
The signature of the join is:
```def join(self, other, on=None, how=None):```
The existing code completely ignores the `how` parameter when `on` is `None`. This patch will process the arguments passed to join and pass in to JVM Spark SQL Analyzer, which will validate the join type passed.
## How was this patch tested?
Used manual and existing test suites.
Author: Bijay Pathak <bkpathak@mtu.edu>
Closes#15409 from bkpathak/SPARK-14761.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgraded to a newer version of Pyrolite which supports serialization of a BinaryType StructField for PySpark.SQL
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test which fails with a raised ValueError when using the previous version of Pyrolite 4.9 and Python3
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15386 from BryanCutler/pyrolite-upgrade-SPARK-17808.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When I was creating the example code for SPARK-10496, I realized it was pretty convoluted to define the frame boundaries for window functions when there is no partition column or ordering column. The reason is that we don't provide a way to create a WindowSpec directly with the frame boundaries. We can trivially improve this by adding rowsBetween and rangeBetween to Window object.
As an example, to compute cumulative sum using the natural ordering, before this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.partitionBy(lit(1)).rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
After this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
Note that you could argue there is no point specifying a window frame without partitionBy/orderBy -- but it is strange that only rowsBetween and rangeBetween are not the only two APIs not available.
This also fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17656 (removing _root_.scala).
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to compute cumulative sum in DataFrameWindowSuite for Scala/Java and tests.py for Python.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15412 from rxin/SPARK-17844.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If given a list of paths, `pyspark.sql.readwriter.text` will attempt to use an undefined variable `paths`. This change checks if the param `paths` is a basestring and then converts it to a list, so that the same variable `paths` can be used for both cases
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test for reading list of files
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15379 from BryanCutler/sql-readtext-paths-SPARK-17805.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In optimizer, we try to evaluate the condition to see whether it's nullable or not, but some expressions are not evaluable, we should check that before evaluate it.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#15103 from davies/udf_join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, `df.take(1)` runs a single-stage job which computes only one partition of the DataFrame, while `df.limit(1).collect()` computes all partitions and runs a two-stage job. This difference in performance is confusing.
The reason why `limit(1).collect()` is so much slower is that `collect()` internally maps to `df.rdd.<some-pyspark-conversions>.toLocalIterator`, which causes Spark SQL to build a query where a global limit appears in the middle of the plan; this, in turn, ends up being executed inefficiently because limits in the middle of plans are now implemented by repartitioning to a single task rather than by running a `take()` job on the driver (this was done in #7334, a patch which was a prerequisite to allowing partition-local limits to be pushed beneath unions, etc.).
In order to fix this performance problem I think that we should generalize the fix from SPARK-10731 / #8876 so that `DataFrame.collect()` also delegates to the Scala implementation and shares the same performance properties. This patch modifies `DataFrame.collect()` to first collect all results to the driver and then pass them to Python, allowing this query to be planned using Spark's `CollectLimit` optimizations.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a regression test in `sql/tests.py` which asserts that the expected number of jobs, stages, and tasks are run for both queries.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#15068 from JoshRosen/pyspark-collect-limit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there is any Python UDF in the Project between Sort and Limit, it will be collected into TakeOrderedAndProjectExec, ExtractPythonUDFs failed to pull the Python UDFs out because QueryPlan.expressions does not include the expression inside Option[Seq[Expression]].
Ideally, we should fix the `QueryPlan.expressions`, but tried with no luck (it always run into infinite loop). In PR, I changed the TakeOrderedAndProjectExec to no use Option[Seq[Expression]] to workaround it. cc JoshRosen
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression test.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#15030 from davies/all_expr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Method `SQLContext.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` could be removed, we should use `SparkSession.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` instead.
This require updating PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Author: jiangxingbo <jiangxb1987@gmail.com>
Closes#14790 from jiangxb1987/parseDataType.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`PySpark` loses `microsecond` precision for some corner cases during converting `Timestamp` into `Long`. For example, for the following `datetime.max` value should be converted a value whose last 6 digits are '999999'. This PR improves the logic not to lose precision for all cases.
**Corner case**
```python
>>> datetime.datetime.max
datetime.datetime(9999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999999)
```
**Before**
```python
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> from pyspark.sql import Row
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, TimestampType
>>> schema = StructType([StructField("dt", TimestampType(), False)])
>>> [schema.toInternal(row) for row in [{"dt": datetime.max}]]
[(253402329600000000,)]
```
**After**
```python
>>> [schema.toInternal(row) for row in [{"dt": datetime.max}]]
[(253402329599999999,)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins test with a new test case.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14631 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-17035.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In 2.0, we verify the data type against schema for every row for safety, but with performance cost, this PR make it optional.
When we verify the data type for StructType, it does not support all the types we support in infer schema (for example, dict), this PR fix that to make them consistent.
For Row object which is created using named arguments, the order of fields are sorted by name, they may be not different than the order in provided schema, this PR fix that by ignore the order of fields in this case.
## How was this patch tested?
Created regression tests for them.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#14469 from davies/py_dict.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two related bugs of Python-only UDTs. Because the test case of second one needs the first fix too. I put them into one PR. If it is not appropriate, please let me know.
### First bug: When MapObjects works on Python-only UDTs
`RowEncoder` will use `PythonUserDefinedType.sqlType` for its deserializer expression. If the sql type is `ArrayType`, we will have `MapObjects` working on it. But `MapObjects` doesn't consider `PythonUserDefinedType` as its input data type. It causes error like:
import pyspark.sql.group
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql.types import *
schema = StructType().add("key", LongType()).add("val", PythonOnlyUDT())
df = spark.createDataFrame([(i % 3, PythonOnlyPoint(float(i), float(i))) for i in range(10)], schema=schema)
df.show()
File "/home/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o36.showString.
: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error while decoding: scala.MatchError: org.apache.spark.sql.types.PythonUserDefinedTypef4ceede8 (of class org.apache.spark.sql.types.PythonUserDefinedType)
...
### Second bug: When Python-only UDTs is the element type of ArrayType
import pyspark.sql.group
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql.types import *
schema = StructType().add("key", LongType()).add("val", ArrayType(PythonOnlyUDT()))
df = spark.createDataFrame([(i % 3, [PythonOnlyPoint(float(i), float(i))]) for i in range(10)], schema=schema)
df.show()
## How was this patch tested?
PySpark's sql tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13778 from viirya/fix-pyudt.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Scala UDT will bypass all the null and will not pass them into serialize() and deserialize() of UDT, this PR update the Python UDT to do this as well.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13878 from davies/udt_null.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we create a SparkSession at the Python side, it is possible that a SparkContext has been created. For this case, we need to set configs of the SparkSession builder to the Scala SparkContext's SparkConf (we need to do so because conf changes on a active Python SparkContext will not be propagated to the JVM side). Otherwise, we may create a wrong SparkSession (e.g. Hive support is not enabled even if enableHiveSupport is called).
## How was this patch tested?
New tests and manual tests.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#13931 from yhuai/SPARK-16224.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Fix tests regarding show functions functionality
- Revert `catalog.ListFunctions` and `SHOW FUNCTIONS` to return to `Spark 1.X` functionality.
Cherry picked changes from this PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413/files
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <wchambers@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Closes#13916 from anabranch/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the bug when Python UDF is used in explode (generator), GenerateExec requires that all the attributes in expressions should be resolvable from children when creating, we should replace the children first, then replace it's expressions.
```
>>> df.select(explode(f(*df))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 286, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, truncate))
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 933, in __call__
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o52.showString.
: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: makeCopy, tree:
Generate explode(<lambda>(_1#0L)), false, false, [col#15L]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[_1#0L]
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.makeCopy(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:45)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressionsDown(QueryPlan.scala:177)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressions(QueryPlan.scala:144)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$python$ExtractPythonUDFs$$extract(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:153)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:114)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foldLeft(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:124)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foldLeft(List.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.prepareForExecution(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withTypedCallback(Dataset.scala:2557)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.head(Dataset.scala:1923)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.take(Dataset.scala:2138)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.showString(Dataset.scala:239)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:237)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:280)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:128)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:211)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:412)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 42 more
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: pythonUDF0#20
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:278)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:268)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.<init>(GenerateExec.scala:63)
... 52 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find pythonUDF0#20 in [_1#0L]
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 67 more
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13883 from davies/udf_in_generate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows us to create a Row without any fields.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test for empty row and udf without arguments.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13812 from davies/no_argus.
Fix the bug for Python UDF that does not have any arguments.
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies.liu@gmail.com>
Closes#13793 from davies/fix_no_arguments.
(cherry picked from commit abe36c53d1)
Signed-off-by: Davies Liu <davies.liu@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After we move the ExtractPythonUDF rule into physical plan, Python UDF can't work on top of aggregate anymore, because they can't be evaluated before aggregate, should be evaluated after aggregate. This PR add another rule to extract these kind of Python UDF from logical aggregate, create a Project on top of Aggregate.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests. The plan of added test query looks like this:
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [<lambda>('k, 's) AS t#26]
+- Aggregate [<lambda>(key#5L)], [<lambda>(key#5L) AS k#17, sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint)) AS s#22L]
+- LogicalRDD [key#5L, value#6]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
t: int
Project [<lambda>(k#17, s#22L) AS t#26]
+- Aggregate [<lambda>(key#5L)], [<lambda>(key#5L) AS k#17, sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint)) AS s#22L]
+- LogicalRDD [key#5L, value#6]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [<lambda>(agg#29, agg#30L) AS t#26]
+- Aggregate [<lambda>(key#5L)], [<lambda>(key#5L) AS agg#29, sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint)) AS agg#30L]
+- LogicalRDD [key#5L, value#6]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [pythonUDF0#37 AS t#26]
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(agg#29, agg#30L)], [agg#29, agg#30L, pythonUDF0#37]
+- *HashAggregate(key=[<lambda>(key#5L)#31], functions=[sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint))], output=[agg#29,agg#30L])
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(<lambda>(key#5L)#31, 200)
+- *HashAggregate(key=[pythonUDF0#34 AS <lambda>(key#5L)#31], functions=[partial_sum(cast(pythonUDF1#35 as bigint))], output=[<lambda>(key#5L)#31,sum#33L])
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(key#5L), <lambda>(value#6)], [key#5L, value#6, pythonUDF0#34, pythonUDF1#35]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[key#5L,value#6]
```
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13682 from davies/fix_py_udf.
Renamed for simplicity, so that its obvious that its related to streaming.
Existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13673 from tdas/SPARK-15953.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the DataFrameReader/Writer has method that are needed for streaming and non-streaming DFs. This is quite awkward because each method in them through runtime exception for one case or the other. So rather having half the methods throw runtime exceptions, its just better to have a different reader/writer API for streams.
- [x] Python API!!
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + two sets of unit tests for DataFrameReader/Writer and DataStreamReader/Writer.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13653 from tdas/SPARK-15933.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkSession.catalog.listFunctions currently returns all functions, including the list of built-in functions. This makes the method not as useful because anytime it is run the result set contains over 100 built-in functions.
## How was this patch tested?
CatalogSuite
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#13413 from techaddict/SPARK-15663.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently structured streaming only supports append output mode. This PR adds the following.
- Added support for Complete output mode in the internal state store, analyzer and planner.
- Added public API in Scala and Python for users to specify output mode
- Added checks for unsupported combinations of output mode and DF operations
- Plans with no aggregation should support only Append mode
- Plans with aggregation should support only Update and Complete modes
- Default output mode is Append mode (**Question: should we change this to automatically set to Complete mode when there is aggregation?**)
- Added support for Complete output mode in Memory Sink. So Memory Sink internally supports append and complete, update. But from public API only Complete and Append output modes are supported.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in various test suites
- StreamingAggregationSuite: tests for complete mode
- MemorySinkSuite: tests for checking behavior in Append and Complete modes.
- UnsupportedOperationSuite: tests for checking unsupported combinations of DF ops and output modes
- DataFrameReaderWriterSuite: tests for checking that output mode cannot be called on static DFs
- Python doc test and existing unit tests modified to call write.outputMode.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13286 from tdas/complete-mode.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PySpark SQL `test_column_name_with_non_ascii` wants to test non-ascii column name. But it doesn't actually test it. We need to construct an unicode explicitly using `unicode` under Python 2.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13134 from viirya/correct-non-ascii-colname-pytest.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the unit test code, examples, and documents to remove calls to deprecated method `dataset.registerTempTable`.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR only changes the unit test code, examples, and comments. It should be safe.
This is a follow up of PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945 which was merged.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13098 from clockfly/spark-15171-remove-deprecation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**createDataFrame** returns inconsistent types for column names.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, StringType
>>> schema = StructType([StructField(u"col", StringType())])
>>> df1 = spark.createDataFrame([("a",)], schema)
>>> df1.columns # "col" is str
['col']
>>> df2 = spark.createDataFrame([("a",)], [u"col"])
>>> df2.columns # "col" is unicode
[u'col']
```
The reason is only **StructField** has the following code.
```
if not isinstance(name, str):
name = name.encode('utf-8')
```
This PR adds the same logic into **createDataFrame** for consistency.
```
if isinstance(schema, list):
schema = [x.encode('utf-8') if not isinstance(x, str) else x for x in schema]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins test (with new python doctest)
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13097 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15244.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use SparkSession instead of SQLContext in Python TestSuites
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#13044 from techaddict/SPARK-15037-python.
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support partitioning in the file stream sink. This is implemented using a new, but simpler code path for writing parquet files - both unpartitioned and partitioned. This new code path does not use Output Committers, as we will eventually write the file names to the metadata log for "committing" them.
This patch duplicates < 100 LOC from the WriterContainer. But its far simpler that WriterContainer as it does not involve output committing. In addition, it introduces the new APIs in FileFormat and OutputWriterFactory in an attempt to simplify the APIs (not have Job in the `FileFormat` API, not have bucket and other stuff in the `OutputWriterFactory.newInstance()` ).
# Tests
- New unit tests to test the FileStreamSinkWriter for partitioned and unpartitioned files
- New unit test to partially test the FileStreamSink for partitioned files (does not test recovery of partition column data, as that requires change in the StreamFileCatalog, future PR).
- Updated FileStressSuite to test number of records read from partitioned output files.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#12409 from tdas/streaming-partitioned-parquet.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Remove all the `spark.setConf` etc. Just expose `spark.conf`
2. Make `spark.conf` take in things set in the core `SparkConf` as well, otherwise users may get confused
This was done for both the Python and Scala APIs.
## How was this patch tested?
`SQLConfSuite`, python tests.
This one fixes the failed tests in #12787Closes#12787
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#12798 from yhuai/conf-api.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Addresses comments in #12765.
## How was this patch tested?
Python tests.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#12784 from andrewor14/python-followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds Python APIs for:
- `ContinuousQueryManager`
- `ContinuousQueryException`
The `ContinuousQueryException` is a very basic wrapper, it doesn't provide the functionality that the Scala side provides, but it follows the same pattern for `AnalysisException`.
For `ContinuousQueryManager`, all APIs are provided except for registering listeners.
This PR also attempts to fix test flakiness by stopping all active streams just before tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Python Doc tests and unit tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#12673 from brkyvz/pyspark-cqm.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
Welcome to
____ __
/ __/__ ___ _____/ /__
_\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/ '_/
/__ / .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\ version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
/_/
Using Python version 2.7.5 (default, Mar 9 2014 22:15:05)
SparkSession available as 'spark'.
>>> spark
<pyspark.sql.session.SparkSession object at 0x101f3bfd0>
>>> spark.sql("SHOW TABLES").show()
...
+---------+-----------+
|tableName|isTemporary|
+---------+-----------+
| src| false|
+---------+-----------+
>>> spark.range(1, 10, 2).show()
+---+
| id|
+---+
| 1|
| 3|
| 5|
| 7|
| 9|
+---+
```
**Note**: This API is NOT complete in its current state. In particular, for now I left out the `conf` and `catalog` APIs, which were added later in Scala. These will be added later before 2.0.
## How was this patch tested?
Python tests.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#12746 from andrewor14/python-spark-session.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Python, the `option` and `options` method of `DataFrameReader` and `DataFrameWriter` were sending the string "None" instead of `null` when passed `None`, therefore making it impossible to send an actual `null`. This fixes that problem.
This is based on #11305 from mathieulongtin.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test to readwriter.py.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Author: mathieu longtin <mathieu.longtin@nuance.com>
Closes#12494 from viirya/py-df-none-option.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expand the possible ways to interact with the contents of a `pyspark.sql.types.StructType` instance.
- Iterating a `StructType` will iterate its fields
- `[field.name for field in my_structtype]`
- Indexing with a string will return a field by name
- `my_structtype['my_field_name']`
- Indexing with an integer will return a field by position
- `my_structtype[0]`
- Indexing with a slice will return a new `StructType` with just the chosen fields:
- `my_structtype[1:3]`
- The length is the number of fields (should also provide "truthiness" for free)
- `len(my_structtype) == 2`
## How was this patch tested?
Extended the unit test coverage in the accompanying `tests.py`.
Author: Sheamus K. Parkes <shea.parkes@milliman.com>
Closes#12251 from skparkes/pyspark-structtype-enhance.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch provides a first cut of python APIs for structured streaming. This PR provides the new classes:
- ContinuousQuery
- Trigger
- ProcessingTime
in pyspark under `pyspark.sql.streaming`.
In addition, it contains the new methods added under:
- `DataFrameWriter`
a) `startStream`
b) `trigger`
c) `queryName`
- `DataFrameReader`
a) `stream`
- `DataFrame`
a) `isStreaming`
This PR doesn't contain all methods exposed for `ContinuousQuery`, for example:
- `exception`
- `sourceStatuses`
- `sinkStatus`
They may be added in a follow up.
This PR also contains some very minor doc fixes in the Scala side.
## How was this patch tested?
Python doc tests
TODO:
- [ ] verify Python docs look good
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Author: Burak Yavuz <burak@databricks.com>
Closes#12320 from brkyvz/stream-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change unpersist blocking parameter default value to match Scala
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests, manual tests
jkbradley davies
Author: felixcheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#12507 from felixcheung/pyunpersist.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we extract Python UDFs into a special logical plan EvaluatePython in analyzer, But EvaluatePython is not part of catalyst, many rules have no knowledge of it , which will break many things (for example, filter push down or column pruning).
We should treat Python UDFs as normal expressions, until we want to evaluate in physical plan, we could extract them in end of optimizer, or physical plan.
This PR extract Python UDFs in physical plan.
Closes#10935
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12127 from davies/py_udf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support multiple Python UDFs within single batch, also improve the performance.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import IntegerType
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("double", lambda x: x * 2, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("add", lambda x, y: x + y, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.sql("SELECT double(add(1, 2)), add(double(2), 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('double('add(1, 2)), None),unresolvedalias('add('double(2), 1), None)]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
double(add(1, 2)): int, add(double(2), 1): int
Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17,pythonUDF0#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Using the following script to benchmark 1, 2 and 3 udfs,
```
df = sqlContext.range(1, 1 << 23, 1, 4)
double = F.udf(lambda x: x * 2, LongType())
print df.select(double(df.id)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1), double(df.id + 2)).count()
```
Here is the results:
N | Before | After | speed up
---- |------------ | -------------|------
1 | 22 s | 7 s | 3.1X
2 | 38 s | 13 s | 2.9X
3 | 58 s | 16 s | 3.6X
This benchmark ran locally with 4 CPUs. For 3 UDFs, it launched 12 Python before before this patch, 4 process after this patch. After this patch, it will use less memory for multiple UDFs than before (less buffering).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12057 from davies/multi_udfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR brings the support for chained Python UDFs, for example
```sql
select udf1(udf2(a))
select udf1(udf2(a) + 3)
select udf1(udf2(a) + udf3(b))
```
Also directly chained unary Python UDFs are put in single batch of Python UDFs, others may require multiple batches.
For example,
```python
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#10 AS double(double(1))#9]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(double(1)), [pythonUDF#10]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1) + double(2))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#19 AS double((double(1) + double(2)))#16]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double((pythonUDF#17 + pythonUDF#18)), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18,pythonUDF#19]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(2), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(1), [pythonUDF#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
TODO: will support multiple unrelated Python UDFs in one batch (another PR).
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests for chained UDFs.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12014 from davies/py_udfs.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current ANTLR3 parser is quite complex to maintain and suffers from code blow-ups. This PR introduces a new parser that is based on ANTLR4.
This parser is based on the [Presto's SQL parser](https://github.com/facebook/presto/blob/master/presto-parser/src/main/antlr4/com/facebook/presto/sql/parser/SqlBase.g4). The current implementation can parse and create Catalyst and SQL plans. Large parts of the HiveQl DDL and some of the DML functionality is currently missing, the plan is to add this in follow-up PRs.
This PR is a work in progress, and work needs to be done in the following area's:
- [x] Error handling should be improved.
- [x] Documentation should be improved.
- [x] Multi-Insert needs to be tested.
- [ ] Naming and package locations.
### How was this patch tested?
Catalyst and SQL unit tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11557 from hvanhovell/ngParser.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
unionAll has been deprecated in SPARK-14088.
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by all existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11946 from rxin/SPARK-14142.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves the `createDataFrame` method to make it also accept datatype string, then users can convert python RDD to DataFrame easily, for example, `df = rdd.toDF("a: int, b: string")`.
It also supports flat schema so users can convert an RDD of int to DataFrame directly, we will automatically wrap int to row for users.
If schema is given, now we checks if the real data matches the given schema, and throw error if it doesn't.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in `test.py` and doc test in `types.py`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11444 from cloud-fan/pyrdd.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove `map`, `flatMap`, `mapPartitions` from python DataFrame, to prepare for Dataset API in the future.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11445 from cloud-fan/python-clean.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Scala DataFrameStatFunctions: Added version of approxQuantile taking a List instead of an Array, for Python compatbility
* Python DataFrame and DataFrameStatFunctions: Added approxQuantile
## How was this patch tested?
* unit test in sql/tests.py
Documentation was copied from the existing approxQuantile exactly.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#11356 from jkbradley/approx-quantile-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds equality operators to UDT classes so that they can be correctly tested for dataType equality during union operations.
This was previously causing `"AnalysisException: u"unresolved operator 'Union;""` when trying to unionAll two dataframes with UDT columns as below.
```
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql import types
schema = types.StructType([types.StructField("point", PythonOnlyUDT(), True)])
a = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(1.0, 2.0)]], schema)
b = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(3.0, 4.0)]], schema)
c = a.unionAll(b)
```
## How was the this patch tested?
Tested using two unit tests in sql/test.py and the DataFrameSuite.
Additional information here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13410
Author: Franklyn D'souza <franklynd@gmail.com>
Closes#11279 from damnMeddlingKid/udt-union-all.
This PR adds the ability to specify the ```ignoreNulls``` option to the functions dsl, e.g:
```df.select($"id", last($"value", ignoreNulls = true).over(Window.partitionBy($"id").orderBy($"other"))```
This PR is some where between a bug fix (see the JIRA) and a new feature. I am not sure if we should backport to 1.6.
cc yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10957 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13049.
The error message is now changed from "Do not support type class scala.Tuple2." to "Do not support type class org.json4s.JsonAST$JNull$" to be more informative about what is not supported. Also, StructType metadata now handles JNull correctly, i.e., {'a': None}. test_metadata_null is added to tests.py to show the fix works.
Author: Jason Lee <cjlee@us.ibm.com>
Closes#8969 from jasoncl/SPARK-10847.
When actual row length doesn't conform to specified schema field length, we should give a better error message instead of throwing an unintuitive `ArrayOutOfBoundsException`.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10886 from liancheng/spark-12624.
This is #9263 from gliptak (improving grouping/display of test case results) with a small fix of bisecting k-means unit test.
Author: Gábor Lipták <gliptak@gmail.com>
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#10850 from mengxr/SPARK-11295.
SPARK-11295 Add packages to JUnit output for Python tests
This improves grouping/display of test case results.
Author: Gábor Lipták <gliptak@gmail.com>
Closes#9263 from gliptak/SPARK-11295.
In this PR the new CatalystQl parser stack reaches grammar parity with the old Parser-Combinator based SQL Parser. This PR also replaces all uses of the old Parser, and removes it from the code base.
Although the existing Hive and SQL parser dialects were mostly the same, some kinks had to be worked out:
- The SQL Parser allowed syntax like ```APPROXIMATE(0.01) COUNT(DISTINCT a)```. In order to make this work we needed to hardcode approximate operators in the parser, or we would have to create an approximate expression. ```APPROXIMATE_COUNT_DISTINCT(a, 0.01)``` would also do the job and is much easier to maintain. So, this PR **removes** this keyword.
- The old SQL Parser supports ```LIMIT``` clauses in nested queries. This is **not supported** anymore. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689 for the rationale for this.
- Hive has a charset name char set literal combination it supports, for instance the following expression ```_ISO-8859-1 0x4341464562616265``` would yield this string: ```CAFEbabe```. Hive will only allow charset names to start with an underscore. This is quite annoying in spark because as soon as you use a tuple names will start with an underscore. In this PR we **remove** this feature from the parser. It would be quite easy to implement such a feature as an Expression later on.
- Hive and the SQL Parser treat decimal literals differently. Hive will turn any decimal into a ```Double``` whereas the SQL Parser would convert a non-scientific decimal into a ```BigDecimal```, and would turn a scientific decimal into a Double. We follow Hive's behavior here. The new parser supports a big decimal literal, for instance: ```81923801.42BD```, which can be used when a big decimal is needed.
cc rxin viirya marmbrus yhuai cloud-fan
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10745 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12575-2.
Previously (when the PR was first created) not specifying b= explicitly was fine (and treated as default null) - instead be explicit about b being None in the test.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10564 from holdenk/SPARK-12611-fix-test-infer-schema-local.
Current schema inference for local python collections halts as soon as there are no NullTypes. This is different than when we specify a sampling ratio of 1.0 on a distributed collection. This could result in incomplete schema information.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10275 from holdenk/SPARK-12300-fix-schmea-inferance-on-local-collections.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9830
This PR contains the following main changes.
* Removing `AggregateExpression1`.
* Removing `Aggregate` operator, which is used to evaluate `AggregateExpression1`.
* Removing planner rule used to plan `Aggregate`.
* Linking `MultipleDistinctRewriter` to analyzer.
* Renaming `AggregateExpression2` to `AggregateExpression` and `AggregateFunction2` to `AggregateFunction`.
* Updating places where we create aggregate expression. The way to create aggregate expressions is `AggregateExpression(aggregateFunction, mode, isDistinct)`.
* Changing `val`s in `DeclarativeAggregate`s that touch children of this function to `lazy val`s (when we create aggregate expression in DataFrame API, children of an aggregate function can be unresolved).
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#9556 from yhuai/removeAgg1.
For now they are thin wrappers around the corresponding Hive UDAFs.
One limitation with these in Hive 0.13.0 is they only support aggregating primitive types.
I chose snake_case here instead of camelCase because it seems to be used in the majority of the multi-word fns.
Do we also want to add these to `functions.py`?
This approach was recommended here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8592#issuecomment-154247089
marmbrus rxin
Author: Nick Buroojy <nick.buroojy@civitaslearning.com>
Closes#9526 from nburoojy/nick/udaf-alias.
(cherry picked from commit a6ee4f989d)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
As ```assertEquals``` is deprecated, so we need to change ```assertEquals``` to ```assertEqual``` for existing python unit tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#8814 from yanboliang/spark-10615.
`pyspark.sql.column.Column` object has `__getitem__` method, which makes it iterable for Python. In fact it has `__getitem__` to address the case when the column might be a list or dict, for you to be able to access certain element of it in DF API. The ability to iterate over it is just a side effect that might cause confusion for the people getting familiar with Spark DF (as you might iterate this way on Pandas DF for instance)
Issue reproduction:
```
df = sqlContext.jsonRDD(sc.parallelize(['{"name": "El Magnifico"}']))
for i in df["name"]: print i
```
Author: 0x0FFF <programmerag@gmail.com>
Closes#8574 from 0x0FFF/SPARK-10417.
This PR addresses issue [SPARK-10392](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10392)
The problem is that for "start of epoch" date (01 Jan 1970) PySpark class DateType returns 0 instead of the `datetime.date` due to implementation of its return statement
Issue reproduction on master:
```
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>> a = DateType()
>>> a.fromInternal(0)
0
>>> a.fromInternal(1)
datetime.date(1970, 1, 2)
```
Author: 0x0FFF <programmerag@gmail.com>
Closes#8556 from 0x0FFF/SPARK-10392.
This PR addresses [SPARK-10162](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10162)
The issue is with DataFrame filter() function, if datetime.datetime is passed to it:
* Timezone information of this datetime is ignored
* This datetime is assumed to be in local timezone, which depends on the OS timezone setting
Fix includes both code change and regression test. Problem reproduction code on master:
```python
import pytz
from datetime import datetime
from pyspark.sql import *
from pyspark.sql.types import *
sqc = SQLContext(sc)
df = sqc.createDataFrame([], StructType([StructField("dt", TimestampType())]))
m1 = pytz.timezone('UTC')
m2 = pytz.timezone('Etc/GMT+3')
df.filter(df.dt > datetime(2000, 01, 01, tzinfo=m1)).explain()
df.filter(df.dt > datetime(2000, 01, 01, tzinfo=m2)).explain()
```
It gives the same timestamp ignoring time zone:
```
>>> df.filter(df.dt > datetime(2000, 01, 01, tzinfo=m1)).explain()
Filter (dt#0 > 946713600000000)
Scan PhysicalRDD[dt#0]
>>> df.filter(df.dt > datetime(2000, 01, 01, tzinfo=m2)).explain()
Filter (dt#0 > 946713600000000)
Scan PhysicalRDD[dt#0]
```
After the fix:
```
>>> df.filter(df.dt > datetime(2000, 01, 01, tzinfo=m1)).explain()
Filter (dt#0 > 946684800000000)
Scan PhysicalRDD[dt#0]
>>> df.filter(df.dt > datetime(2000, 01, 01, tzinfo=m2)).explain()
Filter (dt#0 > 946695600000000)
Scan PhysicalRDD[dt#0]
```
PR [8536](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8536) was occasionally closed by me dropping the repo
Author: 0x0FFF <programmerag@gmail.com>
Closes#8555 from 0x0FFF/SPARK-10162.
DataFrame.withColumn in Python should be consistent with the Scala one (replacing the existing column that has the same name).
cc marmbrus
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#8300 from davies/with_column.
This bug is caused by a wrong column-exist-check in `__getitem__` of pyspark dataframe. `DataFrame.apply` accepts not only top level column names, but also nested column name like `a.b`, so we should remove that check from `__getitem__`.
Author: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@outlook.com>
Closes#8202 from cloud-fan/nested.
Raise an read-only exception when user try to mutable a Row.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#8009 from davies/readonly_row and squashes the following commits:
8722f3f [Davies Liu] add tests
05a3d36 [Davies Liu] Row should be read-only
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9691
jkbradley rxin
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#7999 from yhuai/pythonRand and squashes the following commits:
4187e0c [Yin Huai] Regression test.
a985ef9 [Yin Huai] Use "if seed is not None" instead "if seed" because "if seed" returns false when seed is 0.
Also we could create a Python UDT without having a Scala one, it's important for Python users.
cc mengxr JoshRosen
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7453 from davies/class_in_main and squashes the following commits:
4dfd5e1 [Davies Liu] add tests for Python and Scala UDT
793d9b2 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into class_in_main
dc65f19 [Davies Liu] address comment
a9a3c40 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into class_in_main
a86e1fc [Davies Liu] fix serialization
ad528ba [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into class_in_main
63f52ef [Davies Liu] fix pylint check
655b8a9 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into class_in_main
316a394 [Davies Liu] support Python UDT with UTF
0bcb3ef [Davies Liu] fix bug in mllib
de986d6 [Davies Liu] fix test
83d65ac [Davies Liu] fix bug in StructType
55bb86e [Davies Liu] support Python UDT in __main__ (without Scala one)
Author: JD <jd@csh.rit.edu>
Author: Joseph Batchik <josephbatchik@gmail.com>
Closes#7606 from JDrit/expr and squashes the following commits:
ad7f607 [Joseph Batchik] fixing python linter error
9d6daea [Joseph Batchik] removed order by per @rxin's comment
707d5c6 [Joseph Batchik] Added expr to fuctions.py
79df83c [JD] added example to the docs
b89eec8 [JD] moved function up as per @rxin's comment
4960909 [JD] updated per @JoshRosen's comment
2cb329c [JD] updated per @rxin's comment
9a9ad0c [JD] removing unused import
6dc26d0 [JD] removed split
7f2222c [JD] Adding expr function as per SPARK-8668
This PR also remove the duplicated code between registerFunction and UserDefinedFunction.
cc JoshRosen
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7450 from davies/fix_return_type and squashes the following commits:
e80bf9f [Davies Liu] remove debugging code
f94b1f6 [Davies Liu] fix mima
8f9c58b [Davies Liu] convert returned object from UDF into internal type
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9101
Author: Mateusz Buśkiewicz <mateusz.buskiewicz@getbase.com>
Closes#7499 from sixers/spark-9101 and squashes the following commits:
dd75aa6 [Mateusz Buśkiewicz] [SPARK-9101] [PySpark] Test for selecting null literal
97e3f2f [Mateusz Buśkiewicz] [SPARK-9101] [PySpark] Add missing NullType to _atomic_types in pyspark.sql.types
It may loss precision in microseconds when using float for it.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7344 from davies/fix_date_test and squashes the following commits:
249ec61 [Davies Liu] fix flaky test
This PR fix the long standing issue of serialization between Python RDD and DataFrame, it change to using a customized Pickler for InternalRow to enable customized unpickling (type conversion, especially for UDT), now we can support UDT for UDF, cc mengxr .
There is no generated `Row` anymore.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7301 from davies/sql_ser and squashes the following commits:
81bef71 [Davies Liu] address comments
e9217bd [Davies Liu] add regression tests
db34167 [Davies Liu] Refactor of serialization for Python DataFrame
This PR fixes the converter for Python DataFrame, especially for DecimalType
Closes#7106
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7131 from davies/decimal_python and squashes the following commits:
4d3c234 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into decimal_python
20531d6 [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into decimal_python
7d73168 [Davies Liu] fix conflit
6cdd86a [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into decimal_python
7104e97 [Davies Liu] improve type infer
9cd5a21 [Davies Liu] run python tests with SPARK_PREPEND_CLASSES
829a05b [Davies Liu] fix UDT in python
c99e8c5 [Davies Liu] fix mima
c46814a [Davies Liu] convert decimal for Python DataFrames
Use UTF-8 to encode the name of column in Python 2, or it may failed to encode with default encoding ('ascii').
This PR also fix a bug when there is Java exception without error message.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7165 from davies/non_ascii and squashes the following commits:
02cb61a [Davies Liu] fix tests
3b09d31 [Davies Liu] add encoding in header
867754a [Davies Liu] support non-ascii character in column names
Capture the AnalysisException in SQL, hide the long java stack trace, only show the error message.
cc rxin
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#7135 from davies/ananylis and squashes the following commits:
dad7ae7 [Davies Liu] add comment
ec0c0e8 [Davies Liu] Update utils.py
cdd7edd [Davies Liu] add doc
7b044c2 [Davies Liu] fix python 3
f84d3bd [Davies Liu] capture SQL AnalysisException in Python API
I've added functionality to create new StructType similar to how we add parameters to a new SparkContext.
I've also added tests for this type of creation.
Author: Ilya Ganelin <ilya.ganelin@capitalone.com>
Closes#6686 from ilganeli/SPARK-8056B and squashes the following commits:
27c1de1 [Ilya Ganelin] Rename
467d836 [Ilya Ganelin] Removed from_string in favor of _parse_Datatype_json_value
5fef5a4 [Ilya Ganelin] Updates for type parsing
4085489 [Ilya Ganelin] Style errors
3670cf5 [Ilya Ganelin] added string to DataType conversion
8109e00 [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed error in tests
41ab686 [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed style errors
e7ba7e0 [Ilya Ganelin] Moved some python tests to tests.py. Added cleaner handling of null data type and added test for correctness of input format
15868fa [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed python errors
b79b992 [Ilya Ganelin] Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into SPARK-8056B
a3369fc [Ilya Ganelin] Fixing space errors
e240040 [Ilya Ganelin] Style
bab7823 [Ilya Ganelin] Constructor error
73d4677 [Ilya Ganelin] Style
4ed00d9 [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed default arg
67df57a [Ilya Ganelin] Removed Foo
04cbf0c [Ilya Ganelin] Added comments for single object
0484d7a [Ilya Ganelin] Restored second method
6aeb740 [Ilya Ganelin] Style
689e54d [Ilya Ganelin] Style
f497e9e [Ilya Ganelin] Got rid of old code
e3c7a88 [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed doctest failure
a62ccde [Ilya Ganelin] Style
966ac06 [Ilya Ganelin] style checks
dabb7e6 [Ilya Ganelin] Added Python tests
a3f4152 [Ilya Ganelin] added python bindings and better comments
e6e536c [Ilya Ganelin] Added extra space
7529a2e [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed formatting
d388f86 [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed small bug
c4e3bf5 [Ilya Ganelin] Reverted to using parse. Updated parse to support long
d7634b6 [Ilya Ganelin] Reverted to fromString to properly support types
22c39d5 [Ilya Ganelin] replaced FromString with DataTypeParser.parse. Replaced empty constructor initializing a null to have it instead create a new array to allow appends to it.
faca398 [Ilya Ganelin] [SPARK-8056] Replaced default argument usage. Updated usage and code for DataType.fromString
1acf76e [Ilya Ganelin] Scala style
e31c674 [Ilya Ganelin] Fixed bug in test
8dc0795 [Ilya Ganelin] Added tests for creation of StructType object with new methods
fdf7e9f [Ilya Ganelin] [SPARK-8056] Created add methods to facilitate building new StructType objects.
I compared PySpark DataFrameReader/Writer against Scala ones. `Option` function is missing in both reader and writer, but the rest seems to all match.
I added `Option` to reader and writer and updated the `pyspark-sql` test.
Author: Cheolsoo Park <cheolsoop@netflix.com>
Closes#7078 from piaozhexiu/SPARK-8355 and squashes the following commits:
c63d419 [Cheolsoo Park] Fix version
524e0aa [Cheolsoo Park] Add option function to df reader and writer
It's a common mistake that user will put Column in a boolean expression (together with `and` , `or`), which does not work as expected, we should raise a exception in that case, and suggest user to use `&`, `|` instead.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#6961 from davies/column_bool and squashes the following commits:
9f19beb [Davies Liu] update message
af74bd6 [Davies Liu] fix tests
07dff84 [Davies Liu] address comments, fix tests
f70c08e [Davies Liu] raise Exception if column is used in booelan expression
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8532
This PR has two changes. First, it fixes the bug that save actions (i.e. `save/saveAsTable/json/parquet/jdbc`) always override mode. Second, it adds input argument `partitionBy` to `save/saveAsTable/parquet`.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#6937 from yhuai/SPARK-8532 and squashes the following commits:
f972d5d [Yin Huai] davies's comment.
d37abd2 [Yin Huai] style.
d21290a [Yin Huai] Python doc.
889eb25 [Yin Huai] Minor refactoring and add partitionBy to save, saveAsTable, and parquet.
7fbc24b [Yin Huai] Use None instead of "error" as the default value of mode since JVM-side already uses "error" as the default value.
d696dff [Yin Huai] Python style.
88eb6c4 [Yin Huai] If mode is "error", do not call mode method.
c40c461 [Yin Huai] Regression test.
Spark SQL does not support timezone, and Pyrolite does not support timezone well. This patch will convert datetime into POSIX timestamp (without confusing of timezone), which is used by SQL. If the datetime object does not have timezone, it's treated as local time.
The timezone in RDD will be lost after one round trip, all the datetime from SQL will be local time.
Because of Pyrolite, datetime from SQL only has precision as 1 millisecond.
This PR also drop the timezone in date, convert it to number of days since epoch (used in SQL).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#6250 from davies/tzone and squashes the following commits:
44d8497 [Davies Liu] add timezone support for DateType
99d9d9c [Davies Liu] use int for timestamp
10aa7ca [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into tzone
6a29aa4 [Davies Liu] support datetime with timezone
1. range() overloaded in SQLContext.scala
2. range() modified in python sql context.py
3. Tests added accordingly in DataFrameSuite.scala and python sql tests.py
Author: animesh <animesh@apache.spark>
Closes#6609 from animeshbaranawal/SPARK-7980 and squashes the following commits:
935899c [animesh] SPARK-7980:python+scala changes
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#6532 from davies/decimal and squashes the following commits:
c7fcbce [Davies Liu] Update tests.py
1425359 [Davies Liu] DecimalType should not be singleton
cc rxin, please take a quick look, I'm working on tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#6238 from davies/readwrite and squashes the following commits:
c7200eb [Davies Liu] update tests
9cbf01b [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into readwrite
f0c5a04 [Davies Liu] use sqlContext.read.load
5f68bc8 [Davies Liu] update tests
6437e9a [Davies Liu] Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into readwrite
bcc6668 [Davies Liu] add reader amd writer API in Python
