This patch adds a Hadoop 2.7 build profile in order to let us automate tests against that version.
/cc rxin srowen
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#10775 from JoshRosen/add-hadoop-2.7-profile.
There are a couple of places in the `dev/run-tests-*.py` scripts which deal with Hadoop profiles, but the set of profiles that they handle does not include all Hadoop profiles defined in our POM. Similarly, the `hadoop-2.2` and `hadoop-2.6` profiles were missing from `dev/deps`.
This patch updates these scripts to include all four Hadoop profiles defined in our POM.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#10565 from JoshRosen/add-missing-hadoop-profiles-in-test-scripts.
This patch adds a new build check which enumerates Spark's resolved runtime classpath and saves it to a file, then diffs against that file to detect whether pull requests have introduced dependency changes. The aim of this check is to make it simpler to reason about whether pull request which modify the build have introduced new dependencies or changed transitive dependencies in a way that affects the final classpath.
This supplants the checks added in SPARK-4123 / #5093, which are currently disabled due to bugs.
This patch is based on pwendell's work in #8531.
Closes#8531.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Author: Patrick Wendell <patrick@databricks.com>
Closes#10461 from JoshRosen/SPARK-10359.
This replaces https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9696
Invoke Checkstyle and print any errors to the console, failing the step.
Use Google's style rules modified according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Spark+Code+Style+Guide
Some important checks are disabled (see TODOs in `checkstyle.xml`) due to
multiple violations being present in the codebase.
Suggest fixing those TODOs in a separate PR(s).
More on Checkstyle can be found on the [official website](http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/).
Sample output (from [build 46345](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46345/consoleFull)) (duplicated because I run the build twice with different profiles):
> Checkstyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java:[217,7] (coding) MissingSwitchDefault: switch without "default" clause.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:[198,10] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'protected' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java:[217,7] (coding) MissingSwitchDefault: switch without "default" clause.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:[198,10] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'protected' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
> [error] running /home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/dev/lint-java ; received return code 1
Also fix some of the minor violations that didn't require sweeping changes.
Apologies for the previous botched PRs - I finally figured out the issue.
cr: JoshRosen, pwendell
> I state that the contribution is my original work, and I license the work to the project under the project's open source license.
Author: Dmitry Erastov <derastov@gmail.com>
Closes#9867 from dskrvk/master.
This commit refactors the `run-tests-jenkins` script into Python. This refactoring was done by brennonyork in #7401; this PR contains a few minor edits from joshrosen in order to bring it up to date with other recent changes.
From the original PR description (by brennonyork):
Currently a few things are left out that, could and I think should, be smaller JIRA's after this.
1. There are still a few areas where we use environment variables where we don't need to (like `CURRENT_BLOCK`). I might get around to fixing this one in lieu of everything else, but wanted to point that out.
2. The PR tests are still written in bash. I opted to not change those and just rewrite the runner into Python. This is a great follow-on JIRA IMO.
3. All of the linting scripts are still in bash as well and would likely do to just add those in as follow-on JIRA's as well.
Closes#7401.
Author: Brennon York <brennon.york@capitalone.com>
Closes#9161 from JoshRosen/run-tests-jenkins-refactoring.
