## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
this PR correct some comment error:
1. change from "as low a possible" to "as low as possible" in RewriteDistinctAggregates.scala
2. delete redundant word “with” in HiveTableScanExec’s doExecute() method
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#22694 from CarolinePeng/update_comment.
Authored-by: 彭灿00244106 <00244106@zte.intra>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Literal.value` should have a value a value corresponding to `dataType`. This pr added code to verify it and fixed the existing tests to do so.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing tests.
Closes#22724 from maropu/SPARK-25734.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds new function `from_csv()` similar to `from_json()` to parse columns with CSV strings. I added the following methods:
```Scala
def from_csv(e: Column, schema: StructType, options: Map[String, String]): Column
```
and this signature to call it from Python, R and Java:
```Scala
def from_csv(e: Column, schema: String, options: java.util.Map[String, String]): Column
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test suites `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and sql tests.
Closes#22379 from MaxGekk/from_csv.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AFAIK multi-column count is not widely supported by the mainstream databases(postgres doesn't support), and the SQL standard doesn't define it clearly, as near as I can tell.
Since Spark supports it, we should clearly document the current behavior and add tests to verify it.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22728 from cloud-fan/doc.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Only test these 4 cases is enough:
be2238fb50/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetWriteSupport.scala (L269-L279)
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests on my local machine.
before:
```
- filter pushdown - decimal (13 seconds, 683 milliseconds)
```
after:
```
- filter pushdown - decimal (9 seconds, 713 milliseconds)
```
Closes#22636 from wangyum/SPARK-25629.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LOAD DATA INPATH didn't work if the defaultFS included a port for hdfs.
Handling this just requires a small change to use the correct URI
constructor.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test, ran all tests via jenkins
Closes#22733 from squito/SPARK-25738.
Authored-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22594 . This alternative can avoid the unneeded computation in the hot code path.
- For row-based scan, we keep the original way.
- For the columnar scan, we just need to update the stats after each batch.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22731 from gatorsmile/udpateStatsFileScanRDD.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Project logical operator generates valid constraints using two opposite operations. It substracts child constraints from all constraints, than union child constraints again. I think it may be not necessary.
Aggregate operator has the same problem with Project.
This PR try to remove these two opposite collection operations.
## How was this patch tested?
Related unit tests:
ProjectEstimationSuite
CollapseProjectSuite
PushProjectThroughUnionSuite
UnsafeProjectionBenchmark
GeneratedProjectionSuite
CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite
TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite
GenerateUnsafeProjectionSuite
BucketedRandomProjectionLSHSuite
RemoveRedundantAliasAndProjectSuite
AggregateBenchmark
AggregateOptimizeSuite
AggregateEstimationSuite
DecimalAggregatesSuite
DateFrameAggregateSuite
ObjectHashAggregateSuite
TwoLevelAggregateHashMapSuite
ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark
SingleLevelAggregateHaspMapSuite
TypedImperativeAggregateSuite
RewriteDistinctAggregatesSuite
HashAggregationQuerySuite
HashAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite
TypedImperativeAggregateSuite
TwoLevelAggregateHashMapWithVectorizedMapSuite
Closes#22706 from SongYadong/generate_constraints.
Authored-by: SongYadong <song.yadong1@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR addresses [the comment](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22715#discussion_r225024084) in the previous one. `outputOrdering` becomes a field of `InMemoryRelation`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Closes#22726 from mgaido91/SPARK-25727_followup.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `outputOrdering ` to `otherCopyArgs` in InMemoryRelation so that this field will be copied when we doing the tree transformation.
```
val data = Seq(100).toDF("count").cache()
data.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.toJSON
```
The above code can generate the following error:
```
assertion failed: InMemoryRelation fields: output, cacheBuilder, statsOfPlanToCache, outputOrdering, values: List(count#178), CachedRDDBuilder(true,10000,StorageLevel(disk, memory, deserialized, 1 replicas),*(1) Project [value#176 AS count#178]
+- LocalTableScan [value#176]
,None), Statistics(sizeInBytes=12.0 B, hints=none)
java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed: InMemoryRelation fields: output, cacheBuilder, statsOfPlanToCache, outputOrdering, values: List(count#178), CachedRDDBuilder(true,10000,StorageLevel(disk, memory, deserialized, 1 replicas),*(1) Project [value#176 AS count#178]
+- LocalTableScan [value#176]
,None), Statistics(sizeInBytes=12.0 B, hints=none)
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:170)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.jsonFields(TreeNode.scala:611)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$trees$TreeNode$$collectJsonValue$1(TreeNode.scala:599)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.jsonValue(TreeNode.scala:604)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.toJSON(TreeNode.scala:590)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test
Closes#22715 from gatorsmile/copyArgs1.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-22479](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19708/files#diff-5c22ac5160d3c9d81225c5dd86265d27R31) adds a test case which sometimes fails because the used password string `123` matches `41230802`. This PR aims to fix the flakiness.
- https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97343/consoleFull
```scala
SaveIntoDataSourceCommandSuite:
- simpleString is redacted *** FAILED ***
"SaveIntoDataSourceCommand .org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcRelationProvider41230802, Map(password -> *********(redacted), url -> *********(redacted), driver -> mydriver), ErrorIfExists
+- Range (0, 1, step=1, splits=Some(2))
" contained "123" (SaveIntoDataSourceCommandSuite.scala:42)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the updated test case
Closes#22716 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-25726.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
improve the code comment added in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22702/files
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22711 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `Range` reports metrics in batch granularity. This is acceptable, but it's better if we can make it row granularity without performance penalty.
Before this PR, the metrics are updated when preparing the batch, which is before we actually consume data. In this PR, the metrics are updated after the data are consumed. There are 2 different cases:
1. The data processing loop has a stop check. The metrics are updated when we need to stop.
2. no stop check. The metrics are updated after the loop.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests and a new benchmark
Closes#22698 from cloud-fan/range.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```Scala
val df1 = Seq(("abc", 1), (null, 3)).toDF("col1", "col2")
df1.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).parquet("/tmp/test1")
val df2 = spark.read.parquet("/tmp/test1")
df2.filter("col1 = 'abc' OR (col1 != 'abc' AND col2 == 3)").show()
```
Before the PR, it returns both rows. After the fix, it returns `Row ("abc", 1))`. This is to fix the bug in NULL handling in BooleanSimplification. This is a bug introduced in Spark 1.6 release.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases
Closes#22702 from gatorsmile/fixBooleanSimplify2.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `JoinBenchmark` to use main method.
1. use `spark-submit`:
```console
bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark --jars ./core/target/spark-core_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar ./sql/catalyst/target/spark-sql_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
2. Generate benchmark result:
```console
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22661 from wangyum/SPARK-25664.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR addresses the exception raised on accessing chars out of delimiter string. In particular, the backward slash `\` as the CSV fields delimiter causes the following exception on reading `abc\1`:
```Scala
String index out of range: 1
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 1
at java.lang.String.charAt(String.java:658)
```
because `str.charAt(1)` tries to access a char out of `str` in `CSVUtils.toChar`
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests for empty string and string containing the backward slash to `CSVUtilsSuite`. Besides of that I added an end-to-end test to check how the backward slash is handled in reading CSV string with it.
Closes#22654 from MaxGekk/csv-slash-delim.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After the changes, total execution time of `JsonExpressionsSuite.scala` dropped from 12.5 seconds to 3 seconds.
Closes#22657 from MaxGekk/json-timezone-test.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently SQL tab in the WEBUI doesn't support pagination. Because of that following issues are happening.
1) For large number of executions, SQL page is throwing OOM exception (around 40,000)
2) For large number of executions, loading SQL page is taking time.
3) Difficult to analyse the execution table for large number of execution.
[Note: spark.sql.ui.retainedExecutions = 50000]
All the tabs, Jobs, Stages etc. supports pagination. So, to make it consistent with other tabs
SQL tab also should support pagination.
I have followed the similar flow of the pagination code in the Jobs and Stages page for SQL page.
Also, this patch doesn't make any behavior change for the SQL tab except the pagination support.
## How was this patch tested?
bin/spark-shell --conf spark.sql.ui.retainedExecutions=50000
Run 50,000 sql queries.
**Before this PR**
**After this PR**
Loading of the page is faster, and OOM issue doesn't happen.
Closes#22645 from shahidki31/SPARK-25566.
Authored-by: Shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
According to the SQL standard, when a query contains `HAVING`, it indicates an aggregate operator. For more details please refer to https://blog.jooq.org/2014/12/04/do-you-really-understand-sqls-group-by-and-having-clauses/
However, in Spark SQL parser, we treat HAVING as a normal filter when there is no GROUP BY, which breaks SQL semantic and lead to wrong result. This PR fixes the parser.
## How was this patch tested?
new test
Closes#22696 from cloud-fan/having.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The HandleNullInputsForUDF rule can generate new If node infinitely, thus causing problems like match of SQL cache missed.
This was fixed in SPARK-24891 and was then broken by SPARK-25044.
The unit test in `AnalysisSuite` added in SPARK-24891 should have failed but didn't because it wasn't properly updated after the `ScalaUDF` constructor signature change. So this PR also updates the test accordingly based on the new `ScalaUDF` constructor.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated the original UT. This should be justified as the original UT became invalid after SPARK-25044.
Closes#22701 from maryannxue/spark-25690.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR can correctly cause assertion failure when incorrect nullable of DataType in the result is generated by a target function to be tested.
Let us think the following example. In the future, a developer would write incorrect code that returns unexpected result. We have to correctly cause fail in this test since `valueContainsNull=false` while `expr` includes `null`. However, without this PR, this test passes. This PR can correctly cause fail.
```
test("test TARGETFUNCTON") {
val expr = TARGETMAPFUNCTON()
// expr = UnsafeMap(3 -> 6, 7 -> null)
// expr.dataType = (IntegerType, IntegerType, false)
expected = Map(3 -> 6, 7 -> null)
checkEvaluation(expr, expected)
```
In [`checkEvaluationWithUnsafeProjection`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala#L208-L235), the results are compared using `UnsafeRow`. When the given `expected` is [converted](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala#L226-L227)) to `UnsafeRow` using the `DataType` of `expr`.
```
val expectedRow = UnsafeProjection.create(Array(expression.dataType, expression.dataType)).apply(lit)
```
In summary, `expr` is `[0,1800000038,5000000038,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6]` with and w/o this PR. `expected` is converted to
* w/o this PR, `[0,1800000038,5000000038,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6]`
* with this PR, `[0,1800000038,5000000038,18,2,0,700000003,2,2,6,18,2,0,700000003,2,2,6]`
As a result, w/o this PR, the test unexpectedly passes.
This is because, w/o this PR, based on given `dataType`, generated code of projection for `expected` avoids to set nullbit.
```
// tmpInput_2 is expected
/* 155 */ for (int index_1 = 0; index_1 < numElements_1; index_1++) {
/* 156 */ mutableStateArray_1[1].write(index_1, tmpInput_2.getInt(index_1));
/* 157 */ }
```
With this PR, generated code of projection for `expected` always checks whether nullbit should be set by `isNullAt`
```
// tmpInput_2 is expected
/* 161 */ for (int index_1 = 0; index_1 < numElements_1; index_1++) {
/* 162 */
/* 163 */ if (tmpInput_2.isNullAt(index_1)) {
/* 164 */ mutableStateArray_1[1].setNull4Bytes(index_1);
/* 165 */ } else {
/* 166 */ mutableStateArray_1[1].write(index_1, tmpInput_2.getInt(index_1));
/* 167 */ }
/* 168 */
/* 169 */ }
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Closes#22375 from kiszk/SPARK-25388.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Move `CSVDataSource.makeSafeHeader` to `CSVUtils.makeSafeHeader` (as is).
- Historically and at the first place of refactoring (which I did), I intended to put all CSV specific handling (like options), filtering, extracting header, etc.
- See `JsonDataSource`. Now `CSVDataSource` is quite consistent with `JsonDataSource`. Since CSV's code path is quite complicated, we might better match them as possible as we can.
2. Create `CSVHeaderChecker` and put `enforceSchema` logics into that.
- The checking header and column pruning stuff were added (per https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21296) but some of codes such as https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22123 are duplicated
- Also, checking header code is basically here and there. We better put them in a single place, which was quite error-prone. See (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22656).
3. Move `CSVDataSource.checkHeaderColumnNames` to `CSVHeaderChecker.checkHeaderColumnNames` (as is).
- Similar reasons above with 1.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover this.
Closes#22676 from HyukjinKwon/refactoring-csv.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If the records are incremented by more than 1 at a time,the number of bytes might rarely ever get updated，because it might skip over the count that is an exact multiple of UPDATE_INPUT_METRICS_INTERVAL_RECORDS.
This PR just checks whether the increment causes the value to exceed a higher multiple of UPDATE_INPUT_METRICS_INTERVAL_RECORDS.
## How was this patch tested?
existed unit tests
Closes#22594 from 10110346/inputMetrics.
Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove Redundant semicolons in SortMergeJoinExec， thanks.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22695 from heary-cao/RedundantSemicolons.
Authored-by: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Refactor DataSourceReadBenchmark
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and regenerated results.
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark"
```
Closes#22664 from peter-toth/SPARK-25662.
Lead-authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove Hadoop 2.6 references and make 2.7 the default.
Obviously, this is for master/3.0.0 only.
After this we can also get rid of the separate test jobs for Hadoop 2.6.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#22615 from srowen/SPARK-25016.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Inspired by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22574 .
We can partially push down top level conjunctive predicates to Orc.
This PR improves Orc predicate push down in both SQL and Hive module.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test.
Closes#22684 from gengliangwang/pushOrcFilters.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reduced the combination of codecs from 9 to 3 to improve the test runtime.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a test fix.
Closes#22641 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25611.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Try testing timezones in parallel instead in CastSuite, instead of random sampling.
See also #22631
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
Closes#22672 from srowen/SPARK-25605.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22574. Renamed the parameter and added comments.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22679 from gatorsmile/followupSPARK-25559.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is inspired by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22524, but proposes a safer fix.
The current limit whole stage codegen has 2 problems:
1. It's only applied to `InputAdapter`, many leaf nodes can't stop earlier w.r.t. limit.
2. It needs to override a method, which will break if we have more than one limit in the whole-stage.
The first problem is easy to fix, just figure out which nodes can stop earlier w.r.t. limit, and update them. This PR updates `RangeExec`, `ColumnarBatchScan`, `SortExec`, `HashAggregateExec`.
The second problem is hard to fix. This PR proposes to propagate the limit counter variable name upstream, so that the upstream leaf/blocking nodes can check the limit counter and quit the loop earlier.
For better performance, the implementation here follows `CodegenSupport.needStopCheck`, so that we only codegen the check only if there is limit in the query. For columnar node like range, we check the limit counter per-batch instead of per-row, to make the inner loop tight and fast.
Why this is safer?
1. the leaf/blocking nodes don't have to check the limit counter and stop earlier. It's only for performance. (this is same as before)
2. The blocking operators can stop propagating the limit counter name, because the counter of limit after blocking operators will never increase, before blocking operators consume all the data from upstream operators. So the upstream operators don't care about limit after blocking operators. This is also for performance only, it's OK if we forget to do it for some new blocking operators.
## How was this patch tested?
a new test
Closes#22630 from cloud-fan/limit.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the first row of dataset of CSV strings is compared to field names of user specified or inferred schema independently of presence of CSV header. It causes false-positive error messages. For example, parsing `"1,2"` outputs the error:
```java
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: CSV header does not conform to the schema.
Header: 1, 2
Schema: _c0, _c1
Expected: _c0 but found: 1
```
In the PR, I propose:
- Checking CSV header only when it exists
- Filter header from the input dataset only if it exists
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `CSVSuite` which reproduces the issue.
Closes#22656 from MaxGekk/inferred-header-check.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There was 5 suites extends `HadoopFsRelationTest`, for testing "orc"/"parquet"/"text"/"json" data sources.
This PR refactor the base trait `HadoopFsRelationTest`:
1. Rename unnecessary loop for setting parquet conf
2. The test case `SPARK-8406: Avoids name collision while writing files` takes about 14 to 20 seconds. As now all the file format data source are using common code, for creating result files, we can test one data source(Parquet) only to reduce test time.
To run related 5 suites:
```
./build/sbt "hive/testOnly *HadoopFsRelationSuite"
```
The total test run time is reduced from 5 minutes 40 seconds to 3 minutes 50 seconds.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#22643 from gengliangwang/refactorHadoopFsRelationTest.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
While working on another PR, I noticed that there is quite some legacy Java in there that can be beautified. For example the use of features from Java8, such as:
- Collection libraries
- Try-with-resource blocks
No logic has been changed. I think it is important to have a solid codebase with examples that will inspire next PR's to follow up on the best practices.
What are your thoughts on this?
This makes code easier to read, and using try-with-resource makes is less likely to forget to close something.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
No changes in the logic of Spark, but more in the aesthetics of the code.
## How was this patch tested?
Using the existing unit tests. Since no logic is changed, the existing unit tests should pass.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22637 from Fokko/SPARK-25408.
Authored-by: Fokko Driesprong <fokkodriesprong@godatadriven.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `HashBenchmark` to use main method.
1. use `spark-submit`:
```console
bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.sql.HashBenchmark --jars ./core/target/spark-core_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar ./sql/catalyst/target/spark-catalyst_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
2. Generate benchmark result:
```console
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "catalyst/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.HashBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22651 from wangyum/SPARK-25657.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `HashByteArrayBenchmark` to use main method.
1. use `spark-submit`:
```console
bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.sql.HashByteArrayBenchmark --jars ./core/target/spark-core_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar ./sql/catalyst/target/spark-catalyst_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
2. Generate benchmark result:
```console
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "catalyst/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.HashByteArrayBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22652 from wangyum/SPARK-25658.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`InMemoryFileIndex` contains a cache of `LocatedFileStatus` objects. Each `LocatedFileStatus` object can contain several `BlockLocation`s or some subclass of it. Filling up this cache by listing files happens recursively either on the driver or on the executors, depending on the parallel discovery threshold (`spark.sql.sources.parallelPartitionDiscovery.threshold`). If the listing happens on the executors block location objects are converted to simple `BlockLocation` objects to ensure serialization requirements. If it happens on the driver then there is no conversion and depending on the file system a `BlockLocation` object can be a subclass like `HdfsBlockLocation` and consume more memory. This PR adds the conversion to the latter case and decreases memory consumption.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Closes#22603 from peter-toth/SPARK-25062.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the Scala-2.12 build error due to ambiguity in `foreachBatch` test cases.
- https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7-ubuntu-scala-2.12/428/console
```scala
[error] /home/jenkins/workspace/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7-ubuntu-scala-2.12/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/ForeachBatchSinkSuite.scala:102: ambiguous reference to overloaded definition,
[error] both method foreachBatch in class DataStreamWriter of type (function: org.apache.spark.api.java.function.VoidFunction2[org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int],Long])org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.DataStreamWriter[Int]
[error] and method foreachBatch in class DataStreamWriter of type (function: (org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int], Long) => Unit)org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.DataStreamWriter[Int]
[error] match argument types ((org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int], Any) => Unit)
[error] ds.writeStream.foreachBatch((_, _) => {}).trigger(Trigger.Continuous("1 second")).start()
[error] ^
[error] /home/jenkins/workspace/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7-ubuntu-scala-2.12/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/ForeachBatchSinkSuite.scala:106: ambiguous reference to overloaded definition,
[error] both method foreachBatch in class DataStreamWriter of type (function: org.apache.spark.api.java.function.VoidFunction2[org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int],Long])org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.DataStreamWriter[Int]
[error] and method foreachBatch in class DataStreamWriter of type (function: (org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int], Long) => Unit)org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.DataStreamWriter[Int]
[error] match argument types ((org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int], Any) => Unit)
[error] ds.writeStream.foreachBatch((_, _) => {}).partitionBy("value").start()
[error] ^
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Since this failure occurs in Scala-2.12 profile and test cases, Jenkins will not test this. We need to build with Scala-2.12 and run the tests.
Closes#22649 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-SCALA212.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up the joinCriteria parsing in the parser by directly using identifierList
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22648 from gatorsmile/cleanupJoinCriteria.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `MiscBenchmark ` to use main method.
Generate benchmark result:
```sh
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22500 from wangyum/SPARK-25488.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
By replacing loops with random possible value.
- `read partitioning bucketed tables with bucket pruning filters` reduce from 55s to 7s
- `read partitioning bucketed tables having composite filters` reduce from 54s to 8s
- total time: reduce from 288s to 192s
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#22640 from gengliangwang/fastenBucketedReadSuite.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current the CSV's infer schema code inlines `TypeCoercion.findTightestCommonType`. This is a minor refactor to make use of the common type coercion code when applicable. This way we can take advantage of any improvement to the base method.
Thanks to MaxGekk for finding this while reviewing another PR.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a minor refactor. Existing tests are used to verify the change.
Closes#22619 from dilipbiswal/csv_minor.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds support for the setting limit in the sql split function
## How was this patch tested?
1. Updated unit tests
2. Tested using Scala spark shell
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22227 from phegstrom/master.
Authored-by: Parker Hegstrom <phegstrom@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this test case, we are verifying that the result of an UDF is cached when the underlying data frame is cached and that the udf is not evaluated again when the cached data frame is used.
To reduce the runtime we do :
1) Use a single partition dataframe, so the total execution time of UDF is more deterministic.
2) Cut down the size of the dataframe from 10 to 2.
3) Reduce the sleep time in the UDF from 5secs to 2secs.
4) Reduce the failafter condition from 3 to 2.
With the above change, it takes about 4 secs to cache the first dataframe. And subsequent check takes a few hundred milliseconds.
The new runtime for 5 consecutive runs of this test is as follows :
```
[info] - cache UDF result correctly (4 seconds, 906 milliseconds)
[info] - cache UDF result correctly (4 seconds, 281 milliseconds)
[info] - cache UDF result correctly (4 seconds, 288 milliseconds)
[info] - cache UDF result correctly (4 seconds, 355 milliseconds)
[info] - cache UDF result correctly (4 seconds, 280 milliseconds)
```
## How was this patch tested?
This is s test fix.
Closes#22638 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25610.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The total run time of `HiveSparkSubmitSuite` is about 10 minutes.
While the related code is stable, add tag `ExtendedHiveTest` for it.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#22642 from gengliangwang/addTagForHiveSparkSubmitSuite.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before ORC 1.5.3, `orc.dictionary.key.threshold` and `hive.exec.orc.dictionary.key.size.threshold` are applied for all columns. This has been a big huddle to enable dictionary encoding. From ORC 1.5.3, `orc.column.encoding.direct` is added to enforce direct encoding selectively in a column-wise manner. This PR aims to add that feature by upgrading ORC from 1.5.2 to 1.5.3.
The followings are the patches in ORC 1.5.3 and this feature is the only one related to Spark directly.
```
ORC-406: ORC: Char(n) and Varchar(n) writers truncate to n bytes & corrupts multi-byte data (gopalv)
ORC-403: [C++] Add checks to avoid invalid offsets in InputStream
ORC-405: Remove calcite as a dependency from the benchmarks.
ORC-375: Fix libhdfs on gcc7 by adding #include <functional> two places.
ORC-383: Parallel builds fails with ConcurrentModificationException
ORC-382: Apache rat exclusions + add rat check to travis
ORC-401: Fix incorrect quoting in specification.
ORC-385: Change RecordReader to extend Closeable.
ORC-384: [C++] fix memory leak when loading non-ORC files
ORC-391: [c++] parseType does not accept underscore in the field name
ORC-397: Allow selective disabling of dictionary encoding. Original patch was by Mithun Radhakrishnan.
ORC-389: Add ability to not decode Acid metadata columns
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with newly added test cases.
Closes#22622 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-25635.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
