### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. the default memory setting is missing in usage instructions
```
build/sbt -h
```
before
```
-mem <integer> set memory options (default: , which is -Xms2048m -Xmx2048m -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=256m)
```
after
```
-mem <integer> set memory options (default: 2048, which is -Xms2048m -Xmx2048m -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=256m)
```
2. the Perm space is not needed anymore, since java7 is removed.
the changes in this pr are based on the main sbt script of the newest stable version 1.3.4.
### Why are the changes needed?
bug fix
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
manually
Closes#26757 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30121.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add an analyzer rule to convert unresolved `Add`, `Subtract`, etc. to `TimeAdd`, `DateAdd`, etc. according to the following policy:
```scala
/**
* For [[Add]]:
* 1. if both side are interval, stays the same;
* 2. else if one side is interval, turns it to [[TimeAdd]];
* 3. else if one side is date, turns it to [[DateAdd]] ;
* 4. else stays the same.
*
* For [[Subtract]]:
* 1. if both side are interval, stays the same;
* 2. else if the right side is an interval, turns it to [[TimeSub]];
* 3. else if one side is timestamp, turns it to [[SubtractTimestamps]];
* 4. else if the right side is date, turns it to [[DateDiff]]/[[SubtractDates]];
* 5. else if the left side is date, turns it to [[DateSub]];
* 6. else turns it to stays the same.
*
* For [[Multiply]]:
* 1. If one side is interval, turns it to [[MultiplyInterval]];
* 2. otherwise, stays the same.
*
* For [[Divide]]:
* 1. If the left side is interval, turns it to [[DivideInterval]];
* 2. otherwise, stays the same.
*/
```
Besides, we change datetime functions from implicit cast types to strict ones, all available type coercions happen in `DateTimeOperations` coercion rule.
### Why are the changes needed?
Feature Parity between PostgreSQL and Spark, and make the null semantic consistent with Spark.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
1. date_add/date_sub functions only accept int/tinynit/smallint as the second arg, double/string etc, are forbidden like hive, which produce weird results.
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#26412 from yaooqinn/SPARK-29774.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Keep the owner of a database when executing alter database commands
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark will inadvertently delete the owner of a database for executing databases ddls
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
add and modify uts
Closes#26080 from yaooqinn/SPARK-29425.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is an issue for InSubquery expression.
For example, there are two tables `ta` and `tb` created by the below statements.
```
sql("create table ta(id Decimal(18,0)) using parquet")
sql("create table tb(id Decimal(19,0)) using parquet")
```
This statement below would thrown dataType mismatch exception.
```
sql("select * from ta where id in (select id from tb)").show()
```
However, this similar statement could execute successfully.
```
sql("select * from ta where id in ((select id from tb))").show()
```
The root cause is that, for `InSubquery` expression, it does not find a common type for two decimalType like `In` expression.
Besides that, for `InSubquery` expression, it also does not find a common type for DecimalType and double/float/bigInt.
In this PR, I fix this issue by finding widerType for `InSubquery` expression when DecimalType is involved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Some InSubquery would throw dataType mismatch exception.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#26485 from turboFei/SPARK-29860-in-subquery.
Authored-by: turbofei <fwang12@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improved error message while creating views.
### Why are the changes needed?
Error message should suggest user to use TEMPORARY keyword while creating permanent view referred by temporary view.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26317#discussion_r352377363
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Updated test case.
Closes#26731 from amanomer/imp_err_msg.
Authored-by: Aman Omer <amanomer1996@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26654#discussion_r353826162
Instead of OrderingUtil or Utils.nanSafeCompare{Doubles,Floats}, just use java.lang.{Double,Float}.compare directly. All work identically w.r.t. NaN when used to `compare`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Simplification of the previous change, which existed to support Scala 2.13 migration.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#26761 from srowen/SPARK-30009.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
The new auth code was missing this bit, so it was not possible to know which
app a client belonged to when auth was on.
I also refactored the SASL test that checks for this so it also checks the
new protocol (test failed before the fix, passes now).
Closes#26760 from vanzin/SPARK-30129.
Authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a note to the docs README showing how to get Jekyll to automatically pick up changes to the Python API docs.
### Why are the changes needed?
`jekyll serve --watch` doesn't watch for changes to the API docs. Without the technique documented in this note, or something equivalent, developers have to manually retrigger a Jekyll build any time they update the Python API docs.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
I tested this PR manually by making changes to Python docstrings and confirming that Jekyll automatically picks them up and serves them locally.
Closes#26719 from nchammas/SPARK-30084-watch-api-docs.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Where it generates a deprecation warning in Scala 2.13, replace Symbol shorthand syntax `'foo` with an equivalent.
### Why are the changes needed?
Symbol syntax `'foo` is deprecated in Scala 2.13. The lines changed below otherwise generate about 440 warnings when building for 2.13.
The previous PR directly replaced many usages with `Symbol("foo")`. But it's also used to specify Columns via implicit conversion (`.select('foo)`) or even where simple Strings are used (`.as('foo)`), as it's kind of an abstraction for interned Strings.
While I find this syntax confusing and would like to deprecate it, here I just replaced it where it generates a build warning (not sure why all occurrences don't): `$"foo"` or just `"foo"`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Should not change behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#26748 from srowen/SPARK-29392.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding tooltip to SQL tab for better usability.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are a few common points of confusion in the UI that could be clarified with tooltips. We
should add tooltips to explain.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Closes#26641 from 07ARB/SPARK-29453.
Authored-by: 07ARB <ankitrajboudh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, `predictionCol` in `ml.classification` & `ml.clustering` add `NominalAttribute`
2, `rawPredictionCol` in `ml.classification` add `AttributeGroup` containing vectorsize=`numClasses`
3, `probabilityCol` in `ml.classification` & `ml.clustering` add `AttributeGroup` containing vectorsize=`numClasses`/`k`
4, `leafCol` in GBT/RF add `AttributeGroup` containing vectorsize=`numTrees`
5, `leafCol` in DecisionTree add `NominalAttribute`
6, `outputCol` in models in `ml.feature` add `AttributeGroup` containing vectorsize
7, `outputCol` in `UnaryTransformer`s in `ml.feature` add `AttributeGroup` containing vectorsize
### Why are the changes needed?
Appened metadata can be used in downstream ops, like `Classifier.getNumClasses`
There are many impls (like `Binarizer`/`Bucketizer`/`VectorAssembler`/`OneHotEncoder`/`FeatureHasher`/`HashingTF`/`VectorSlicer`/...) in `.ml` that append appropriate metadata in `transform`/`transformSchema` method.
However there are also many impls return no metadata in transformation, even some metadata like `vector.size`/`numAttrs`/`attrs` can be ealily inferred.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, add some metadatas in transformed dataset.
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites and added testsuites
Closes#26547 from zhengruifeng/add_output_vecSize.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid duplicate error message in Analyzed Logical plan.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, when any query throws `AnalysisException`, same error message will be repeated because of following code segment.
04a5b8f5f8/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/QueryExecution.scala (L157-L166)
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually. Result of `explain extended select * from wrong;`
BEFORE
> == Parsed Logical Plan ==
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> == Analyzed Logical Plan ==
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> == Optimized Logical Plan ==
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> == Physical Plan ==
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
AFTER
> == Parsed Logical Plan ==
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> == Analyzed Logical Plan ==
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> == Optimized Logical Plan ==
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
> == Physical Plan ==
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: wrong; line 1 pos 31;
> 'Project [*]
> +- 'UnresolvedRelation [wrong]
>
Closes#26734 from amanomer/cor_APlan.
Authored-by: Aman Omer <amanomer1996@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up to #24043 and cousin of #26730. It exposes the `mergeSchema` option directly in the ORC APIs.
### Why are the changes needed?
So the Python API matches the Scala API.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it adds a new option directly in the ORC reader method signatures.
### How was this patch tested?
I tested this manually as follows:
```
>>> spark.range(3).write.orc('test-orc')
>>> spark.range(3).withColumnRenamed('id', 'name').write.orc('test-orc/nested')
>>> spark.read.orc('test-orc', recursiveFileLookup=True, mergeSchema=True)
DataFrame[id: bigint, name: bigint]
>>> spark.read.orc('test-orc', recursiveFileLookup=True, mergeSchema=False)
DataFrame[id: bigint]
>>> spark.conf.set('spark.sql.orc.mergeSchema', True)
>>> spark.read.orc('test-orc', recursiveFileLookup=True)
DataFrame[id: bigint, name: bigint]
>>> spark.read.orc('test-orc', recursiveFileLookup=True, mergeSchema=False)
DataFrame[id: bigint]
```
Closes#26755 from nchammas/SPARK-30113-ORC-mergeSchema.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change properly documents the `mergeSchema` option directly in the Python APIs for reading Parquet data.
### Why are the changes needed?
The docstring for `DataFrameReader.parquet()` mentions `mergeSchema` but doesn't show it in the API. It seems like a simple oversight.
Before this PR, you'd have to do this to use `mergeSchema`:
```python
spark.read.option('mergeSchema', True).parquet('test-parquet').show()
```
After this PR, you can use the option as (I believe) it was intended to be used:
```python
spark.read.parquet('test-parquet', mergeSchema=True).show()
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, this PR changes the signatures of `DataFrameReader.parquet()` and `DataStreamReader.parquet()` to match their docstrings.
### How was this patch tested?
Testing the `mergeSchema` option directly seems to be left to the Scala side of the codebase. I tested my change manually to confirm the API works.
I also confirmed that setting `spark.sql.parquet.mergeSchema` at the session does not get overridden by leaving `mergeSchema` at its default when calling `parquet()`:
```
>>> spark.conf.set('spark.sql.parquet.mergeSchema', True)
>>> spark.range(3).write.parquet('test-parquet/id')
>>> spark.range(3).withColumnRenamed('id', 'name').write.parquet('test-parquet/name')
>>> spark.read.option('recursiveFileLookup', True).parquet('test-parquet').show()
+----+----+
| id|name|
+----+----+
|null| 1|
|null| 2|
|null| 0|
| 1|null|
| 2|null|
| 0|null|
+----+----+
>>> spark.read.option('recursiveFileLookup', True).parquet('test-parquet', mergeSchema=False).show()
+----+
| id|
+----+
|null|
|null|
|null|
| 1|
| 2|
| 0|
+----+
```
Closes#26730 from nchammas/parquet-merge-schema.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added apt-get update as per [docker best-practices](https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#apt-get)
### Why are the changes needed?
Builder is failing because:
Without doing apt-get update, the APT lists get outdated and begins referring to package versions that no longer exist, hence the 404 trying to download them (Debian does not keep old versions in the archive when a package is updated).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
k8s builder
Closes#26753 from ifilonenko/SPARK-30111.
Authored-by: Ilan Filonenko <ifilonenko@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: shane knapp <incomplete@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When PCA was first impled in [SPARK-5521](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5521), at that time Matrix.multiply(BLAS.gemv internally) did not support sparse vector. So worked around it by applying a sparse matrix multiplication.
Since [SPARK-7681](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7681), BLAS.gemv supported sparse vector. So we can directly use Matrix.multiply now.
### Why are the changes needed?
for simplity
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites
Closes#26745 from zhengruifeng/pca_mul.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As a follow-up to #24830, this PR adds the `recursiveFileLookup` option to the Python DataFrameReader API.
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR maintains Python feature parity with Scala.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
Before this PR, you'd only be able to use this option as follows:
```python
spark.read.option("recursiveFileLookup", True).text("test-data").show()
```
With this PR, you can reference the option from within the format-specific method:
```python
spark.read.text("test-data", recursiveFileLookup=True).show()
```
This option now also shows up in the Python API docs.
### How was this patch tested?
I tested this manually by creating the following directories with dummy data:
```
test-data
├── 1.txt
└── nested
└── 2.txt
test-parquet
├── nested
│ ├── _SUCCESS
│ ├── part-00000-...-.parquet
├── _SUCCESS
├── part-00000-...-.parquet
```
I then ran the following tests and confirmed the output looked good:
```python
spark.read.parquet("test-parquet", recursiveFileLookup=True).show()
spark.read.text("test-data", recursiveFileLookup=True).show()
spark.read.csv("test-data", recursiveFileLookup=True).show()
```
`python/pyspark/sql/tests/test_readwriter.py` seems pretty sparse. I'm happy to add my tests there, though it seems we have been deferring testing like this to the Scala side of things.
Closes#26718 from nchammas/SPARK-27990-recursiveFileLookup-python.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to cut `org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp`and `org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-xml` transitive dependency from `hadoop-common`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will simplify our dependency management by the removal of unused dependencies.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the GitHub Action with all combinations and the Jenkins UT with (Hadoop-3.2).
Closes#26742 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-30051.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This proposes to introduce a naming convention for Spark metrics configuration parameters used to enable/disable metrics source reporting using the Dropwizard metrics library: `spark.metrics.sourceNameCamelCase.enabled` and update 2 parameters to use this naming convention.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently Spark has a few parameters to enable/disable metrics reporting. Their naming pattern is not uniform and this can create confusion. Currently we have:
`spark.metrics.static.sources.enabled`
`spark.app.status.metrics.enabled`
`spark.sql.streaming.metricsEnabled`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Update parameters for enabling/disabling metrics reporting new in Spark 3.0: `spark.metrics.static.sources.enabled` -> `spark.metrics.staticSources.enabled`, `spark.app.status.metrics.enabled` -> `spark.metrics.appStatusSource.enabled`.
Note: `spark.sql.streaming.metricsEnabled` is left unchanged as it is already in use in Spark 2.x.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested
Closes#26692 from LucaCanali/uniformNamingMetricsEnableParameters.
Authored-by: Luca Canali <luca.canali@cern.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changed the test **DPP triggers only for certain types of query** in **DynamicPartitionPruningSuite**.
### Why are the changes needed?
The sql has no partition key. The description "no predicate on the dimension table" is not right. So fix it.
```
Given("no predicate on the dimension table")
withSQLConf(SQLConf.DYNAMIC_PARTITION_PRUNING_ENABLED.key -> "true") {
val df = sql(
"""
|SELECT * FROM fact_sk f
|JOIN dim_store s
|ON f.date_id = s.store_id
""".stripMargin)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Updated UT
Closes#26744 from deshanxiao/30106.
Authored-by: xiaodeshan <xiaodeshan@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move some classes extending Scala collections into parallel source trees, to support 2.13; other minor collection-related modifications.
Modify some classes extending Scala collections to work with 2.13 as well as 2.12. In many cases, this means introducing parallel source trees, as the type hierarchy changed in ways that one class can't support both.
### Why are the changes needed?
To support building for Scala 2.13 in the future.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
There should be no behavior change.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. Note that the 2.13 changes are not tested by the PR builder, of course. They compile in 2.13 but can't even be tested locally. Later, once the project can be compiled for 2.13, thus tested, it's possible the 2.13 implementations will need updates.
Closes#26728 from srowen/SPARK-30012.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added tooltip for duration columns in the batch table of streaming tab of Web UI.
### Why are the changes needed?
Tooltips will help users in understanding columns of batch table of streaming tab.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Closes#26467 from iRakson/streaming_tab_tooltip.
Authored-by: root1 <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Do not cast `NaN` to an `Integer`, `Long`, `Short` or `Byte`. This is because casting `NaN` to those types results in a `0` which erroneously replaces `0`s while only `NaN`s should be replaced.
### Why are the changes needed?
This Scala code snippet:
```
import scala.math;
println(Double.NaN.toLong)
```
returns `0` which is problematic as if you run the following Spark code, `0`s get replaced as well:
```
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([(1.0, 0), (0.0, 3), (float('nan'), 0)], ("index", "value"))
>>> df.show()
+-----+-----+
|index|value|
+-----+-----+
| 1.0| 0|
| 0.0| 3|
| NaN| 0|
+-----+-----+
>>> df.replace(float('nan'), 2).show()
+-----+-----+
|index|value|
+-----+-----+
| 1.0| 2|
| 0.0| 3|
| 2.0| 2|
+-----+-----+
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, after the PR, running the same above code snippet returns the correct expected results:
```
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([(1.0, 0), (0.0, 3), (float('nan'), 0)], ("index", "value"))
>>> df.show()
+-----+-----+
|index|value|
+-----+-----+
| 1.0| 0|
| 0.0| 3|
| NaN| 0|
+-----+-----+
>>> df.replace(float('nan'), 2).show()
+-----+-----+
|index|value|
+-----+-----+
| 1.0| 0|
| 0.0| 3|
| 2.0| 0|
+-----+-----+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests to verify replacing `NaN` only affects columns of type `Float` and `Double`
Closes#26738 from johnhany97/SPARK-30082.
Lead-authored-by: John Ayad <johnhany97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Ayad <jayad@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`UnaryPositive` only accepts numeric and interval as we defined, but what we do for this in `AstBuider.visitArithmeticUnary` is just bypassing it.
This should not be omitted for the type checking requirement.
### Why are the changes needed?
bug fix, you can find a pre-discussion here https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26578#discussion_r347350398
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, +non-numeric-or-interval is now invalid.
```
-- !query 14
select +date '1900-01-01'
-- !query 14 schema
struct<DATE '1900-01-01':date>
-- !query 14 output
1900-01-01
-- !query 15
select +timestamp '1900-01-01'
-- !query 15 schema
struct<TIMESTAMP '1900-01-01 00:00:00':timestamp>
-- !query 15 output
1900-01-01 00:00:00
-- !query 16
select +map(1, 2)
-- !query 16 schema
struct<map(1, 2):map<int,int>>
-- !query 16 output
{1:2}
-- !query 17
select +array(1,2)
-- !query 17 schema
struct<array(1, 2):array<int>>
-- !query 17 output
[1,2]
-- !query 18
select -'1'
-- !query 18 schema
struct<(- CAST(1 AS DOUBLE)):double>
-- !query 18 output
-1.0
-- !query 19
select -X'1'
-- !query 19 schema
struct<>
-- !query 19 output
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
cannot resolve '(- X'01')' due to data type mismatch: argument 1 requires (numeric or interval) type, however, 'X'01'' is of binary type.; line 1 pos 7
-- !query 20
select +X'1'
-- !query 20 schema
struct<X'01':binary>
-- !query 20 output
```
### How was this patch tested?
add ut check
Closes#26716 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30083.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now the min/max/sum/avg are support for intervals, we should also enable it in RelationalGroupedDataset
### Why are the changes needed?
API consistency improvement
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, Dataset support min/max/sum/avg(mean) on intervals
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#26681 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30048.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Observable metrics are named arbitrary aggregate functions that can be defined on a query (Dataframe). As soon as the execution of a Dataframe reaches a completion point (e.g. finishes batch query or reaches streaming epoch) a named event is emitted that contains the metrics for the data processed since the last completion point.
A user can observe these metrics by attaching a listener to spark session, it depends on the execution mode which listener to attach:
- Batch: `QueryExecutionListener`. This will be called when the query completes. A user can access the metrics by using the `QueryExecution.observedMetrics` map.
- (Micro-batch) Streaming: `StreamingQueryListener`. This will be called when the streaming query completes an epoch. A user can access the metrics by using the `StreamingQueryProgress.observedMetrics` map. Please note that we currently do not support continuous execution streaming.
### Why are the changes needed?
This enabled observable metrics.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. It adds the `observe` method to `Dataset`.
### How was this patch tested?
- Added unit tests for the `CollectMetrics` logical node to the `AnalysisSuite`.
- Added unit tests for `StreamingProgress` JSON serialization to the `StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite`.
- Added integration tests for streaming to the `StreamingQueryListenerSuite`.
- Added integration tests for batch to the `DataFrameCallbackSuite`.
Closes#26127 from hvanhovell/SPARK-29348.
Authored-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When user defined a base path which is not an ancestor directory for all the input paths,
throw exception immediately.
### Why are the changes needed?
Assuming that we have a DataFrame[c1, c2] be written out in parquet and partitioned by c1.
When using `spark.read.parquet("/path/to/data/c1=1")` to read the data, we'll have a DataFrame with column c2 only.
But if we use `spark.read.option("basePath", "/path/from").parquet("/path/to/data/c1=1")` to
read the data, we'll have a DataFrame with column c1 and c2.
This's happens because a wrong base path does not actually work in `parsePartition()`, so paring would continue until it reaches a directory without "=".
And I think the result of the second read way doesn't make sense.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, with this change, user would hit `IllegalArgumentException ` when given a wrong base path while previous behavior doesn't.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#26195 from Ngone51/dev-wrong-basePath.
Lead-authored-by: wuyi <ngone_5451@163.com>
Co-authored-by: wuyi <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
MNB/CNB/BNB use empty sigma matrix instead of null
### Why are the changes needed?
1,Using empty sigma matrix will simplify the impl
2,I am reviewing FM impl these days, FMModels have optional bias and linear part. It seems more reasonable to set optional part an empty vector/matrix or zero value than `null`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, sigma from `null` to empty matrix
### How was this patch tested?
updated testsuites
Closes#26679 from zhengruifeng/nb_use_empty_sigma.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve error messages for unsupported data type.
### Why are the changes needed?
When the spark reads the hive table and encounters an unsupported field type, the exception message has only one unsupported type, and the user cannot know which field of which table.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
```create view t AS SELECT STRUCT('a' AS `$a`, 1 AS b) as q;```
current:
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: struct<$a:string,b:int>
change:
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: struct<$a:string,b:int>, column: q
```select * from t,t_normal_1,t_normal_2```
current:
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: struct<$a:string,b:int>
change:
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: struct<$a:string,b:int>, column: q, db: default, table: t
Closes#26577 from cxzl25/unsupport_data_type_msg.
Authored-by: sychen <sychen@ctrip.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes subquery planning by calling the planner and plan preparation rules on the subquery plan directly. Before we were creating a `QueryExecution` instance for subqueries to get the executedPlan. This would re-run analysis and optimization on the subqueries plan. Running the analysis again on an optimized query plan can have unwanted consequences, as some rules, for example `DecimalPrecision`, are not idempotent.
As an example, consider the expression `1.7 * avg(a)` which after applying the `DecimalPrecision` rule becomes:
```
promote_precision(1.7) * promote_precision(avg(a))
```
After the optimization, more specifically the constant folding rule, this expression becomes:
```
1.7 * promote_precision(avg(a))
```
Now if we run the analyzer on this optimized query again, we will get:
```
promote_precision(1.7) * promote_precision(promote_precision(avg(a)))
```
Which will later optimized as:
```
1.7 * promote_precision(promote_precision(avg(a)))
```
As can be seen, re-running the analysis and optimization on this expression results in an expression with extra nested promote_preceision nodes. Adding unneeded nodes to the plan is problematic because it can eliminate situations where we can reuse the plan.
We opted to introduce dedicated planners for subuqueries, instead of making the DecimalPrecision rule idempotent, because this eliminates this entire category of problems. Another benefit is that planning time for subqueries is reduced.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#26705 from dbaliafroozeh/CreateDedicatedPlannerForSubqueries.
Authored-by: Ali Afroozeh <ali.afroozeh@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes the bug on ArrayKeyIndexType.hashCode() as it is simply calling Array.hashCode() which in turn calls Object.hashCode(). That should be Arrays.hashCode() to reflect the elements in the array.
### Why are the changes needed?
I've encountered the bug in #25811 while adding test codes for #25811, and I've split the fix into individual PR to speed up reviewing. Without this patch, ArrayKeyIndexType would bring various issues when it's used as type of collections.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
I've skipped adding UT as ArrayKeyIndexType is in test and the patch is pretty simple one-liner.
Closes#26709 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-30075.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Standardize sql reference
### Why are the changes needed?
To have consistent docs
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Tested using jykyll build --serve
Closes#26721 from huaxingao/spark-30085.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
This change adds a profile to switch to use the right leveldbjni package according to the platforms:
aarch64 uses org.openlabtesting.leveldbjni:leveldbjni-all.1.8, and other platforms use the old one org.fusesource.leveldbjni:leveldbjni-all.1.8.
And because some hadoop dependencies packages are also depend on org.fusesource.leveldbjni:leveldbjni-all, but hadoop merge the similar change on trunk, details see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16614, so exclude the dependency of org.fusesource.leveldbjni for these hadoop packages related.
Then Spark can build/test on aarch64 platform successfully.
Closes#26636 from huangtianhua/add-aarch64-leveldbjni.
Authored-by: huangtianhua <huangtianhua@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The patch adds scaladoc on `HDFSMetadataLog.serialize` and `HDFSMetadataLog.deserialize` for adding implementation note when overriding - HDFSMetadataLog calls `serialize` and `deserialize` inside try-finally and caller will do the resource (input stream, output stream) cleanup, so resource cleanup should not be performed in these methods, but there's no note on this (only code comment, not scaladoc) which is easy to be missed.
### Why are the changes needed?
Contributors who are unfamiliar with the intention seem to think it as a bug if the resource is not cleaned up in serialize/deserialize of subclass of HDFSMetadataLog, and they couldn't know about the intention without reading the code of HDFSMetadataLog. Adding the note as scaladoc would expand the visibility.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Just a doc change.
Closes#26732 from HeartSaVioR/MINOR-SS-HDFSMetadataLog-serde-scaladoc.
Lead-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dz <953396112@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add `.enabled` postfix to `spark.sql.analyzer.failAmbiguousSelfJoin`.
### Why are the changes needed?
to follow the existing naming style
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
not needed
Closes#26694 from cloud-fan/conf.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Optimize aggregates on interval values from sort-based to hash-based, and we can use the `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.RowBasedKeyValueBatch` for better performance.
### Why are the changes needed?
improve aggerates
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add ut and existing ones
Closes#26680 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30047.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-29421 (#26097) , we can specify a different table provider for `CREATE TABLE LIKE` via `USING provider`.
Hive support `STORED AS` new file format syntax:
```sql
CREATE TABLE tbl(a int) STORED AS TEXTFILE;
CREATE TABLE tbl2 LIKE tbl STORED AS PARQUET;
```
For Hive compatibility, we should also support `STORED AS` in `CREATE TABLE LIKE`.
### Why are the changes needed?
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26097#issue-327424759
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Add a new syntax based on current CTL:
CREATE TABLE tbl2 LIKE tbl [STORED AS hiveFormat];
### How was this patch tested?
Add UTs.
Closes#26466 from LantaoJin/SPARK-29839.
Authored-by: LantaoJin <jinlantao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Disable continuous shuffle block fetching when the old fetch protocol in use.
### Why are the changes needed?
The new feature of continuous shuffle block fetching depends on the latest version of the shuffle fetch protocol. We should keep this constraint in `BlockStoreShuffleReader.fetchContinuousBlocksInBatch`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Users will not get the exception related to continuous shuffle block fetching when old version of the external shuffle service is used.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#26663 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30025.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Summarizer support more metrics: sum, std
### Why are the changes needed?
Those metrics are widely used, it will be convenient to directly obtain them other than a conversion.
in `NaiveBayes`: we want the sum of vectors, mean & weightSum need to computed then multiplied
in `StandardScaler`,`AFTSurvivalRegression`,`LinearRegression`,`LinearSVC`,`LogisticRegression`: we need to obtain `variance` and then sqrt it to get std
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, new metrics are exposed to end users
### How was this patch tested?
added testsuites
Closes#26596 from zhengruifeng/summarizer_add_metrics.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds Hive provider into table metadata in `HiveExternalCatalog.alterTableStats`. When we call `HiveClient.alterTable`, `alterTable` will erase if it can not find hive provider in given table metadata.
Rename table also has this issue.
### Why are the changes needed?
Because running `ANALYZE TABLE` on a Hive table, if the table has bucketing info, will erase existing bucket info.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After this PR, running `ANALYZE TABLE` on Hive table, won't erase existing bucketing info.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#26685 from viirya/fix-hive-bucket.
Lead-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use foreach instead of misusing map as a small followup of #26476. This could cause some weird errors potentially and it's not a good practice anyway. See also SPARK-16694
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid potential issues like SPARK-16694
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover.
Closes#26729 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-29851.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Make maxNumPostShufflePartitions config obey reducePostShfflePartitions config.
2. Update the description for all the SQLConf affected by `spark.sql.adaptive.enabled`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make the relation between these confs clearer.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#26664 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-9853-follow.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DataFrameNaFunctions.drop` doesn't handle duplicate columns even when column names are not specified.
```Scala
val left = Seq(("1", null), ("3", "4")).toDF("col1", "col2")
val right = Seq(("1", "2"), ("3", null)).toDF("col1", "col2")
val df = left.join(right, Seq("col1"))
df.printSchema
df.na.drop("any").show
```
produces
```
root
|-- col1: string (nullable = true)
|-- col2: string (nullable = true)
|-- col2: string (nullable = true)
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Reference 'col2' is ambiguous, could be: col2, col2.;
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.package$AttributeSeq.resolve(package.scala:240)
```
The reason for the above failure is that columns are resolved by name and if there are multiple columns with the same name, it will fail due to ambiguity.
This PR updates `DataFrameNaFunctions.drop` such that if the columns to drop are not specified, it will resolve ambiguity gracefully by applying `drop` to all the eligible columns. (Note that if the user specifies the columns, it will still continue to fail due to ambiguity).
### Why are the changes needed?
If column names are not specified, `drop` should not fail due to ambiguity since it should still be able to apply `drop` to the eligible columns.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now all the rows with nulls are dropped in the above example:
```
scala> df.na.drop("any").show
+----+----+----+
|col1|col2|col2|
+----+----+----+
+----+----+----+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Closes#26700 from imback82/na_drop.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For a literal number with an exponent(e.g. 1e-45, 1E2), we'd parse it to Double by default rather than Decimal. And user could still use `spark.sql.legacy.exponentLiteralToDecimal.enabled=true` to fall back to previous behavior.
### Why are the changes needed?
According to ANSI standard of SQL, we see that the (part of) definition of `literal` :
```
<approximate numeric literal> ::=
<mantissa> E <exponent>
```
which indicates that a literal number with an exponent should be approximate numeric(e.g. Double) rather than exact numeric(e.g. Decimal).
And when we test Presto, we found that Presto also conforms to this standard:
```
presto:default> select typeof(1E2);
_col0
--------
double
(1 row)
```
```
presto:default> select typeof(1.2);
_col0
--------------
decimal(2,1)
(1 row)
```
We also find that, actually, literals like `1E2` are parsed as Double before Spark2.1, but changed to Decimal after #14828 due to *The difference between the two confuses most users* as it said. But we also see support(from DB2 test) of original behavior at #14828 (comment).
Although, we also see that PostgreSQL has its own implementation:
```
postgres=# select pg_typeof(1E2);
pg_typeof
-----------
numeric
(1 row)
postgres=# select pg_typeof(1.2);
pg_typeof
-----------
numeric
(1 row)
```
We still think that Spark should also conform to this standard while considering SQL standard and Spark own history and majority DBMS and also user experience.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
For `1E2`, before this PR:
```
scala> spark.sql("select 1E2")
res0: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [1E+2: decimal(1,-2)]
```
After this PR:
```
scala> spark.sql("select 1E2")
res0: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [100.0: double]
```
And for `1E-45`, before this PR:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
decimal can only support precision up to 38
== SQL ==
select 1E-45
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parse(ParseDriver.scala:131)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlParser.parse(SparkSqlParser.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parsePlan(ParseDriver.scala:76)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$1(SparkSession.scala:605)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.QueryPlanningTracker.measurePhase(QueryPlanningTracker.scala:111)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:605)
... 47 elided
```
after this PR:
```
scala> spark.sql("select 1E-45");
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [1.0E-45: double]
```
And before this PR, user may feel super weird to see that `select 1e40` works but `select 1e-40 fails`. And now, both of them work well.
### How was this patch tested?
updated `literals.sql.out` and `ansi/literals.sql.out`
Closes#26595 from Ngone51/SPARK-29956.
Authored-by: wuyi <ngone_5451@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[HIVE-12063](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12063) improved pad decimal numbers with trailing zeros to the scale of the column. The following description is copied from the description of HIVE-12063.
> HIVE-7373 was to address the problems of trimming tailing zeros by Hive, which caused many problems including treating 0.0, 0.00 and so on as 0, which has different precision/scale. Please refer to HIVE-7373 description. However, HIVE-7373 was reverted by HIVE-8745 while the underlying problems remained. HIVE-11835 was resolved recently to address one of the problems, where 0.0, 0.00, and so on cannot be read into decimal(1,1).
However, HIVE-11835 didn't address the problem of showing as 0 in query result for any decimal values such as 0.0, 0.00, etc. This causes confusion as 0 and 0.0 have different precision/scale than 0.
The proposal here is to pad zeros for query result to the type's scale. This not only removes the confusion described above, but also aligns with many other DBs. Internal decimal number representation doesn't change, however.
**Spark SQL**:
```sql
// bin/spark-sql
spark-sql> select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18));
1
spark-sql>
// bin/beeline
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default> select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18));
+----------------------------+--+
| CAST(1 AS DECIMAL(38,18)) |
+----------------------------+--+
| 1.000000000000000000 |
+----------------------------+--+
// bin/spark-shell
scala> spark.sql("select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18))").show(false)
+-------------------------+
|CAST(1 AS DECIMAL(38,18))|
+-------------------------+
|1.000000000000000000 |
+-------------------------+
// bin/pyspark
>>> spark.sql("select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18))").show()
+-------------------------+
|CAST(1 AS DECIMAL(38,18))|
+-------------------------+
| 1.000000000000000000|
+-------------------------+
// bin/sparkR
> showDF(sql("SELECT cast(1 as decimal(38, 18))"))
+-------------------------+
|CAST(1 AS DECIMAL(38,18))|
+-------------------------+
| 1.000000000000000000|
+-------------------------+
```
**PostgreSQL**:
```sql
postgres=# select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18));
numeric
----------------------
1.000000000000000000
(1 row)
```
**Presto**:
```sql
presto> select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18));
_col0
----------------------
1.000000000000000000
(1 row)
```
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual test:
```sql
spark-sql> select cast(1 as decimal(38, 18));
1.000000000000000000
```
Spark SQL Upgrading Guide:
Closes#26697 from wangyum/SPARK-28461.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We used 2.28.2 of Mockito as of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25139 because 3.0.0 might be unstable. Now 3.1.0 is released.
See release notes - https://github.com/mockito/mockito/blob/v3.1.0/doc/release-notes/official.md
### Why are the changes needed?
To bring the fixes made in the dependency.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins will test.
Closes#26707 from HyukjinKwon/upgrade-Mockito.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Closes#26690 from huangtianhua/add-note-spark-runs-on-arm64.
Authored-by: huangtianhua <huangtianhua@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up of #26134 to document the reason to add days filed and explain how do we use it
### Why are the changes needed?
only comment
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
no need test
Closes#26701 from LinhongLiu/spark-29486-followup.
Authored-by: Liu,Linhong <liulinhong@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix flakiness in `HiveThriftServer2ListenerSuite` by using a dedicated JVM (after we switch to Hive 2.3 by default in PR builders). Likewise in 4a73bed318, there's no explicit evidence for this fix.
See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/114653/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ui/HiveThriftServer2ListenerSuite/_It_is_not_a_test_it_is_a_sbt_testing_SuiteSelector_/
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader (instance of net/bytebuddy/dynamic/loading/MultipleParentClassLoader) previously initiated loading for a different type with name "org/apache/hive/service/ServiceStateChangeListener"
at org.mockito.codegen.HiveThriftServer2$MockitoMock$1974707245.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedSerializationConstructorAccessor164.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
at org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.SunReflectionFactoryInstantiator.newInstance(SunReflectionFactoryInstantiator.java:48)
at org.objenesis.ObjenesisBase.newInstance(ObjenesisBase.java:73)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.instance.ObjenesisInstantiator.newInstance(ObjenesisInstantiator.java:19)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.SubclassByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(SubclassByteBuddyMockMaker.java:47)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.ByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(ByteBuddyMockMaker.java:25)
at org.mockito.internal.util.MockUtil.createMock(MockUtil.java:35)
at org.mockito.internal.MockitoCore.mock(MockitoCore.java:62)
at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:1908)
at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:1880)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ui.HiveThriftServer2ListenerSuite.createAppStatusStore(HiveThriftServer2ListenerSuite.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ui.HiveThriftServer2ListenerSuite.$anonfun$new$3(HiveThriftServer2ListenerSuite.scala:47)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To make test cases more robust.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No (dev only).
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins build.
Closes#26720 from shahidki31/mock.
Authored-by: shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to remove the leftover. After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22615, we don't have Hadoop 2.6 profile anymore in master.
### Why are the changes needed?
Using "test-hadoop2.6" against master branch in a PR wouldn't work.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No (dev only).
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26707 and Jenkins build will test.
Without this fix, and hadoop2.6 in the pr title, it shows as below:
```
========================================================================
Building Spark
========================================================================
[error] Could not find hadoop2.6 in the list. Valid options are dict_keys(['hadoop2.7', 'hadoop3.2'])
Attempting to post to Github...
```
Closes#26708 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-25016.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
