## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add handling of input of type `Int` for dataType `TimestampType` to `EvaluatePython.scala`. Py4J serializes ints smaller than MIN_INT or larger than MAX_INT to Long, which are handled correctly already, but values between MIN_INT and MAX_INT are serialized to Int.
These range limits correspond to roughly half an hour on either side of the epoch. As a result, PySpark doesn't allow TimestampType values to be created in this range.
Alternatives attempted: patching the `TimestampType.toInternal` function to cast return values to `long`, so Py4J would always serialize them to Scala Long. Python3 does not have a `long` type, so this approach failed on Python3.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new PySpark-side test that fails without the change.
The contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
Resubmission of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896. The original PR didn't go through Jenkins and broke the build. davies dongjoon-hyun
cloud-fan Could you kick off a Jenkins run for me? It passed everything for me locally, but it's possible something has changed in the last few weeks.
Author: Jason White <jason.white@shopify.com>
Closes#17200 from JasonMWhite/SPARK-19561.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PySpark ```GeneralizedLinearRegression``` supports tweedie distribution.
## How was this patch tested?
Add unit tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#17146 from yanboliang/spark-19806.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cast the output of `TimestampType.toInternal` to long to allow for proper Timestamp creation in DataFrames near the epoch.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test that fails without the change.
dongjoon-hyun davies Mind taking a look?
The contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
Author: Jason White <jason.white@shopify.com>
Closes#16896 from JasonMWhite/SPARK-19561.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to remove incorrect implementation that has been not executed so far (at least from Spark 1.5.2) for `in` operator and throw a correct exception rather than saying it is a bool. I tested the codes above in 1.5.2, 1.6.3, 2.1.0 and in the master branch as below:
**1.5.2**
```python
>>> df = sqlContext.createDataFrame([[1]])
>>> 1 in df._1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark-1.5.2-bin-hadoop2.6/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 418, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**1.6.3**
```python
>>> 1 in sqlContext.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark-1.6.3-bin-hadoop2.6/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 447, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**2.1.0**
```python
>>> 1 in spark.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark-2.1.0-bin-hadoop2.7/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 426, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**Current Master**
```python
>>> 1 in spark.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 452, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**After**
```python
>>> 1 in spark.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 184, in __contains__
raise ValueError("Cannot apply 'in' operator against a column: please use 'contains' "
ValueError: Cannot apply 'in' operator against a column: please use 'contains' in a string column or 'array_contains' function for an array column.
```
In more details,
It seems the implementation intended to support this
```python
1 in df.column
```
However, currently, it throws an exception as below:
```python
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 426, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
What happens here is as below:
```python
class Column(object):
def __contains__(self, item):
print "I am contains"
return Column()
def __nonzero__(self):
raise Exception("I am nonzero.")
>>> 1 in Column()
I am contains
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 6, in __nonzero__
Exception: I am nonzero.
```
It seems it calls `__contains__` first and then `__nonzero__` or `__bool__` is being called against `Column()` to make this a bool (or int to be specific).
It seems `__nonzero__` (for Python 2), `__bool__` (for Python 3) and `__contains__` forcing the the return into a bool unlike other operators. There are few references about this as below:
https://bugs.python.org/issue16011http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12244074/python-source-code-for-built-in-in-operator/12244378#12244378http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38542543/functionality-of-python-in-vs-contains/38542777
It seems we can't overwrite `__nonzero__` or `__bool__` as a workaround to make this working because these force the return type as a bool as below:
```python
class Column(object):
def __contains__(self, item):
print "I am contains"
return Column()
def __nonzero__(self):
return "a"
>>> 1 in Column()
I am contains
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: __nonzero__ should return bool or int, returned str
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests in `tests.py`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17160 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19701.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to both,
**Do not allow json arrays with multiple elements and return null in `from_json` with `StructType` as the schema.**
Currently, it only reads the single row when the input is a json array. So, the codes below:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val schema = StructType(StructField("a", IntegerType) :: Nil)
Seq(("""[{"a": 1}, {"a": 2}]""")).toDF("struct").select(from_json(col("struct"), schema)).show()
```
prints
```
+--------------------+
|jsontostruct(struct)|
+--------------------+
| [1]|
+--------------------+
```
This PR simply suggests to print this as `null` if the schema is `StructType` and input is json array.with multiple elements
```
+--------------------+
|jsontostruct(struct)|
+--------------------+
| null|
+--------------------+
```
**Support json arrays in `from_json` with `ArrayType` as the schema.**
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val schema = ArrayType(StructType(StructField("a", IntegerType) :: Nil))
Seq(("""[{"a": 1}, {"a": 2}]""")).toDF("array").select(from_json(col("array"), schema)).show()
```
prints
```
+-------------------+
|jsontostruct(array)|
+-------------------+
| [[1], [2]]|
+-------------------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test in `JsonExpressionsSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite`, Python doctests and manual test.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#16929 from HyukjinKwon/disallow-array.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `keyword_only` decorator in PySpark is not thread-safe. It writes kwargs to a static class variable in the decorator, which is then retrieved later in the class method as `_input_kwargs`. If multiple threads are constructing the same class with different kwargs, it becomes a race condition to read from the static class variable before it's overwritten. See [SPARK-19348](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19348) for reproduction code.
This change will write the kwargs to a member variable so that multiple threads can operate on separate instances without the race condition. It does not protect against multiple threads operating on a single instance, but that is better left to the user to synchronize.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests for using the keyword_only decorator and a regression test that verifies `_input_kwargs` can be overwritten from different class instances.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#16782 from BryanCutler/pyspark-keyword_only-threadsafe-SPARK-19348.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update doc for R, programming guide. Clarify default behavior for all languages.
## How was this patch tested?
manually
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#17128 from felixcheung/jsonwholefiledoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updates the doc string to match up with the code
i.e. say dropLast instead of includeFirst
## How was this patch tested?
Not much, since it's a doc-like change. Will run unit tests via Jenkins job.
Author: Mark Grover <mark@apache.org>
Closes#17127 from markgrover/spark_19734.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove `org.apache.spark.examples.` in
Add slash in one of the python doc.
## How was this patch tested?
Run examples using the commands in the comments.
Author: Yun Ni <yunn@uber.com>
Closes#17104 from Yunni/yunn_minor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes the support for multiple lines for CSV by resembling the multiline supports in JSON datasource (in case of JSON, per file).
So, this PR introduces `wholeFile` option which makes the format not splittable and reads each whole file. Since Univocity parser can produces each row from a stream, it should be capable of parsing very large documents when the internal rows are fix in the memory.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `CSVSuite` and `tests.py`
Manual tests with a single 9GB CSV file in local file system, for example,
```scala
spark.read.option("wholeFile", true).option("inferSchema", true).csv("tmp.csv").count()
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#16976 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19610.
This PR adds a param to `ALS`/`ALSModel` to set the strategy used when encountering unknown users or items at prediction time in `transform`. This can occur in 2 scenarios: (a) production scoring, and (b) cross-validation & evaluation.
The current behavior returns `NaN` if a user/item is unknown. In scenario (b), this can easily occur when using `CrossValidator` or `TrainValidationSplit` since some users/items may only occur in the test set and not in the training set. In this case, the evaluator returns `NaN` for all metrics, making model selection impossible.
The new param, `coldStartStrategy`, defaults to `nan` (the current behavior). The other option supported initially is `drop`, which drops all rows with `NaN` predictions. This flag allows users to use `ALS` in cross-validation settings. It is made an `expertParam`. The param is made a string so that the set of strategies can be extended in future (some options are discussed in [SPARK-14489](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14489)).
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests, and manual "before and after" tests for Scala & Python using MovieLens `ml-latest-small` as example data. Here, using `CrossValidator` or `TrainValidationSplit` with the default param setting results in metrics that are all `NaN`, while setting `coldStartStrategy` to `drop` results in valid metrics.
Author: Nick Pentreath <nickp@za.ibm.com>
Closes#12896 from MLnick/SPARK-14489-als-nan.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
self.environment will be propagated to executor. Should set PYTHONHASHSEED as long as the python version is greater than 3.3
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested it.
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#11211 from zjffdu/SPARK-13330.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaces `UserDefinedFunction` object returned from `udf` with a function wrapper providing docstring and arguments information as proposed in [SPARK-19161](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19161).
### Backward incompatible changes:
- `pyspark.sql.functions.udf` will return a `function` instead of `UserDefinedFunction`. To ensure backward compatible public API we use function attributes to mimic `UserDefinedFunction` API (`func` and `returnType` attributes). This should have a minimal impact on the user code.
An alternative implementation could use dynamical sub-classing. This would ensure full backward compatibility but is more fragile in practice.
### Limitations:
Full functionality (retained docstring and argument list) is achieved only in the recent Python version. Legacy Python version will preserve only docstrings, but not argument list. This should be an acceptable trade-off between achieved improvements and overall complexity.
### Possible impact on other tickets:
This can affect [SPARK-18777](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18777).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests to ensure backward compatibility, additional tests targeting proposed changes.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16534 from zero323/SPARK-19161.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed the PySpark Params.copy method to behave like the Scala implementation. The main issue was that it did not account for the _defaultParamMap and merged it into the explicitly created param map.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit test to verify the copy method behaves correctly for copying uid, explicitly created params, and default params.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#16772 from BryanCutler/pyspark-ml-param_copy-Scala_sync-SPARK-14772.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
to be consistent with the scala API, we should also add `contains` to `Column` in pyspark.
## How was this patch tested?
updated unit test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#17036 from cloud-fan/pyspark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a logic to put malformed tokens into a new field when parsing CSV data in case of permissive modes. In the current master, if the CSV parser hits these malformed ones, it throws an exception below (and then a job fails);
```
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
at java.sql.Date.valueOf(Date.java:143)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.DateTimeUtils$.stringToTime(DateTimeUtils.scala:137)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$$anonfun$castTo$6.apply$mcJ$sp(CSVInferSchema.scala:272)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$$anonfun$castTo$6.apply(CSVInferSchema.scala:272)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$$anonfun$castTo$6.apply(CSVInferSchema.scala:272)
at scala.util.Try.getOrElse(Try.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$.castTo(CSVInferSchema.scala:269)
at
```
In case that users load large CSV-formatted data, the job failure makes users get some confused. So, this fix set NULL for original columns and put malformed tokens in a new field.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CSVSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#16928 from maropu/SPARK-18699-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a special streaming deduplication operator to support `dropDuplicates` with `aggregation` and watermark. It reuses the `dropDuplicates` API but creates new logical plan `Deduplication` and new physical plan `DeduplicationExec`.
The following cases are supported:
- one or multiple `dropDuplicates()` without aggregation (with or without watermark)
- `dropDuplicates` before aggregation
Not supported cases:
- `dropDuplicates` after aggregation
Breaking changes:
- `dropDuplicates` without aggregation doesn't work with `complete` or `update` mode.
## How was this patch tested?
The new unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16970 from zsxwing/dedup.
- Add dependency on aws-java-sdk-sts
- Replace SerializableAWSCredentials with new SerializableCredentialsProvider interface
- Make KinesisReceiver take SerializableCredentialsProvider as argument and
pass credential provider to KCL
- Add new implementations of KinesisUtils.createStream() that take STS
arguments
- Make JavaKinesisStreamSuite test the entire KinesisUtils Java API
- Update KCL/AWS SDK dependencies to 1.7.x/1.11.x
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[JIRA link with detailed description.](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19405)
* Replace SerializableAWSCredentials with new SerializableKCLAuthProvider class that takes 5 optional config params for configuring AWS auth and returns the appropriate credential provider object
* Add new public createStream() APIs for specifying these parameters in KinesisUtils
## How was this patch tested?
* Manually tested using explicit keypair and instance profile to read data from Kinesis stream in separate account (difficult to write a test orchestrating creation and assumption of IAM roles across separate accounts)
* Expanded JavaKinesisStreamSuite to test the entire Java API in KinesisUtils
## License acknowledgement
This contribution is my original work and that I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
Author: Budde <budde@amazon.com>
Closes#16744 from budde/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix typo in docstring.
Author: Rolando Espinoza <rndmax84@gmail.com>
Closes#16967 from rolando/pyspark-doc-typo.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a new option `wholeFile` is set to `true` the JSON reader will parse each file (instead of a single line) as a value. This is done with Jackson streaming and it should be capable of parsing very large documents, assuming the row will fit in memory.
Because the file is not buffered in memory the corrupt record handling is also slightly different when `wholeFile` is enabled: the corrupt column will contain the filename instead of the literal JSON if there is a parsing failure. It would be easy to extend this to add the parser location (line, column and byte offsets) to the output if desired.
These changes have allowed types other than `String` to be parsed. Support for `UTF8String` and `Text` have been added (alongside `String` and `InputFormat`) and no longer require a conversion to `String` just for parsing.
I've also included a few other changes that generate slightly better bytecode and (imo) make it more obvious when and where boxing is occurring in the parser. These are included as separate commits, let me know if they should be flattened into this PR or moved to a new one.
## How was this patch tested?
New and existing unit tests. No performance or load tests have been run.
Author: Nathan Howell <nhowell@godaddy.com>
Closes#16386 from NathanHowell/SPARK-18352.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request includes python API and examples for LSH. The API changes was based on yanboliang 's PR #15768 and resolved conflicts and API changes on the Scala API. The examples are consistent with Scala examples of MinHashLSH and BucketedRandomProjectionLSH.
## How was this patch tested?
API and examples are tested using spark-submit:
`bin/spark-submit examples/src/main/python/ml/min_hash_lsh.py`
`bin/spark-submit examples/src/main/python/ml/bucketed_random_projection_lsh.py`
User guide changes are generated and manually inspected:
`SKIP_API=1 jekyll build`
Author: Yun Ni <yunn@uber.com>
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Author: Yunni <Euler57721@gmail.com>
Closes#16715 from Yunni/spark-18080.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #16308.
This pr enables timezone support in CSV/JSON parsing.
We should introduce `timeZone` option for CSV/JSON datasources (the default value of the option is session local timezone).
The datasources should use the `timeZone` option to format/parse to write/read timestamp values.
Notice that while reading, if the timestampFormat has the timezone info, the timezone will not be used because we should respect the timezone in the values.
For example, if you have timestamp `"2016-01-01 00:00:00"` in `GMT`, the values written with the default timezone option, which is `"GMT"` because session local timezone is `"GMT"` here, are:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "GMT")
scala> val df = Seq(new java.sql.Timestamp(1451606400000L)).toDF("ts")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ts: timestamp]
scala> df.show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
scala> df.write.json("/path/to/gmtjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/gmtjson/part-*
{"ts":"2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z"}
```
whereas setting the option to `"PST"`, they are:
```scala
scala> df.write.option("timeZone", "PST").json("/path/to/pstjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/pstjson/part-*
{"ts":"2015-12-31T16:00:00.000-08:00"}
```
We can properly read these files even if the timezone option is wrong because the timestamp values have timezone info:
```scala
scala> val schema = new StructType().add("ts", TimestampType)
schema: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType = StructType(StructField(ts,TimestampType,true))
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).json("/path/to/gmtjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timeZone", "PST").json("/path/to/gmtjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
And even if `timezoneFormat` doesn't contain timezone info, we can properly read the values with setting correct timezone option:
```scala
scala> df.write.option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").option("timeZone", "JST").json("/path/to/jstjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/jstjson/part-*
{"ts":"2016-01-01T09:00:00"}
```
```scala
// wrong result
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").json("/path/to/jstjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 09:00:00|
+-------------------+
// correct result
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").option("timeZone", "JST").json("/path/to/jstjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
This pr also makes `JsonToStruct` and `StructToJson` `TimeZoneAwareExpression` to be able to evaluate values with timezone option.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#16750 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-18937.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add coalesce on DataFrame for down partitioning without shuffle and coalesce on Column
## How was this patch tested?
manual, unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#16739 from felixcheung/rcoalesce.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `udf` decorator syntax as proposed in [SPARK-19160](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19160).
This allows users to define UDF using simplified syntax:
```python
from pyspark.sql.decorators import udf
udf(IntegerType())
def add_one(x):
"""Adds one"""
if x is not None:
return x + 1
```
without need to define a separate function and udf.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests to ensure backward compatibility and additional unit tests covering new functionality.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16533 from zero323/SPARK-19160.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to document the changes on QuantileDiscretizer in pyspark for PR:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
## How was this patch tested?
No test needed
Signed-off-by: VinceShieh <vincent.xieintel.com>
Author: VinceShieh <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Closes#16922 from VinceShieh/spark-19590.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a `metadata` keyword parameter to `pyspark.sql.Column.alias()` to allow users to mix-in metadata while manipulating `DataFrame`s in `pyspark`. Without this, I believe it was necessary to pass back through `SparkSession.createDataFrame` each time a user wanted to manipulate `StructField.metadata` in `pyspark`.
This pull request also improves consistency between the Scala and Python APIs (i.e. I did not add any functionality that was not already in the Scala API).
Discussed ahead of time on JIRA with marmbrus
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests (and doc tests). Ran the pertinent tests manually.
Author: Sheamus K. Parkes <shea.parkes@milliman.com>
Closes#16094 from shea-parkes/pyspark-column-alias-metadata.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
UDF constructor checks if `func` argument is callable and if it is not, fails fast instead of waiting for an action.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16535 from zero323/SPARK-19162.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Provides correct description of the semantics of a `dict` argument passed as `to_replace`.
- Describes type requirements for collection arguments.
- Describes behavior with `to_replace: List[T]` and `value: T`
## How was this patch tested?
Manual testing, documentation build.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16792 from zero323/SPARK-19453.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add support for `slice` arguments in `Column.__getitem__`.
- Remove obsolete `__getslice__` bindings.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests, additional tests covering `[]` with `slice`.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16771 from zero323/SPARK-19429.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for data type string as a return type argument of `UserDefinedFunction`:
```python
f = udf(lambda x: x, "integer")
f.returnType
## IntegerType
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests, additional unit tests covering new feature.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16769 from zero323/SPARK-19427.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing `warnings` import.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16846 from zero323/SPARK-19506.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request adds two new user facing functions:
- `to_date` which accepts an expression and a format and returns a date.
- `to_timestamp` which accepts an expression and a format and returns a timestamp.
For example, Given a date in format: `2016-21-05`. (YYYY-dd-MM)
### Date Function
*Previously*
```
to_date(unix_timestamp(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM").cast("timestamp"))
```
*Current*
```
to_date(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM")
```
### Timestamp Function
*Previously*
```
unix_timestamp(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM").cast("timestamp")
```
*Current*
```
to_timestamp(lit("2016-21-05"), "yyyy-dd-MM")
```
### Tasks
- [X] Add `to_date` to Scala Functions
- [x] Add `to_date` to Python Functions
- [x] Add `to_date` to SQL Functions
- [X] Add `to_timestamp` to Scala Functions
- [x] Add `to_timestamp` to Python Functions
- [x] Add `to_timestamp` to SQL Functions
- [x] Add function to R
## How was this patch tested?
- [x] Add Functions to `DateFunctionsSuite`
- Test new `ParseToTimestamp` Expression (*not necessary*)
- Test new `ParseToDate` Expression (*not necessary*)
- [x] Add test for R
- [x] Add test for Python in test.py
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Author: anabranch <bill@databricks.com>
Closes#16138 from anabranch/SPARK-16609.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove cyclic imports between `pyspark.ml.pipeline` and `pyspark.ml`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16814 from zero323/SPARK-19467.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Methods `numClasses` and `numFeatures` in LinearSVCModel are already usable by inheriting `JavaClassificationModel`
we should not explicitly add them.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#16727 from zhengruifeng/nits_in_linearSVC.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Removed Since tags in Python Params since they are inherited by other classes
* Fixed doc links for LinearSVC
## How was this patch tested?
* doc tests
* generating docs locally and checking manually
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#16723 from jkbradley/pyparam-fix-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add the multi-cols support based on current private api
2, add the multi-cols support to pyspark
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Author: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#12135 from zhengruifeng/quantile4multicols.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Defer `UserDefinedFunction._judf` initialization to the first call. This prevents unintended `SparkSession` initialization. This allows users to define and import UDF without creating a context / session as a side effect.
[SPARK-19163](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19163)
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16536 from zero323/SPARK-19163.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding convenience function to Python `JavaWrapper` so that it is easy to create a Py4J JavaArray that is compatible with current class constructors that have a Scala `Array` as input so that it is not necessary to have a Java/Python friendly constructor. The function takes a Java class as input that is used by Py4J to create the Java array of the given class. As an example, `OneVsRest` has been updated to use this and the alternate constructor is removed.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests for the new convenience function and updated `OneVsRest` doctests which use this to persist the model.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#14725 from BryanCutler/pyspark-new_java_array-CountVectorizer-SPARK-17161.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This removes from the `__all__` list class names that are not defined (visible) in the `pyspark.sql.column`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16742 from zero323/SPARK-19403.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Python API for the newly added LinearSVC algorithm.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new doc string test.
Author: wm624@hotmail.com <wm624@hotmail.com>
Closes#16694 from wangmiao1981/ser.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to fix an issue occurred when resharding Kinesis streams; the resharding makes the KCL throw an exception because Spark does not checkpoint `SHARD_END` when finishing reading closed shards in `KinesisRecordProcessor#shutdown`. This bug finally leads to stopping subscribing new split (or merged) shards.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test in `KinesisStreamSuite` to check if it works well when splitting/merging shards.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#16213 from maropu/SPARK-18020.
The code was failing to propagate the user conf in the case where the
JVM was already initialized, which happens when a user submits a
python script via spark-submit.
Tested with new unit test and by running a python script in a real cluster.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#16682 from vanzin/SPARK-19307.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is weird to create Hive source tables when using InMemoryCatalog. We are unable to operate it. This PR is to block users to create Hive source tables.
### How was this patch tested?
Fixed the test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#16587 from gatorsmile/blockHiveTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PythonUDF is unevaluable, which can not be used inside a join condition, currently the optimizer will push a PythonUDF which accessing both side of join into the join condition, then the query will fail to plan.
This PR fix this issue by checking the expression is evaluable or not before pushing it into Join.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a regression test.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#16581 from davies/pyudf_join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add loglikelihood in GMM.summary
## How was this patch tested?
added tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Author: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#12064 from zhengruifeng/gmm_metric.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For some datasources which are based on HadoopRDD or NewHadoopRDD, such as spark-xml, InputFileBlockHolder doesn't work with Python UDF.
The method to reproduce it is, running the following codes with `bin/pyspark --packages com.databricks:spark-xml_2.11:0.4.1`:
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf,input_file_name
from pyspark.sql.types import StringType
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
def filename(path):
return path
session = SparkSession.builder.appName('APP').getOrCreate()
session.udf.register('sameText', filename)
sameText = udf(filename, StringType())
df = session.read.format('xml').load('a.xml', rowTag='root').select('*', input_file_name().alias('file'))
df.select('file').show() # works
df.select(sameText(df['file'])).show() # returns empty content
The issue is because in `HadoopRDD` and `NewHadoopRDD` we set the file block's info in `InputFileBlockHolder` before the returned iterator begins consuming. `InputFileBlockHolder` will record this info into thread local variable. When running Python UDF in batch, we set up another thread to consume the iterator from child plan's output rdd, so we can't read the info back in another thread.
To fix this, we have to set the info in `InputFileBlockHolder` after the iterator begins consuming. So the info can be read in correct thread.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test with above example codes for spark-xml package on pyspark: `bin/pyspark --packages com.databricks:spark-xml_2.11:0.4.1`.
Added pyspark test.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16585 from viirya/fix-inputfileblock-hadooprdd.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `jdbc` API do not check the `lowerBound` and `upperBound` when we
specified the ``column``, and just throw the following exception:
>```int() argument must be a string or a number, not 'NoneType'```
If we check the parameter, we can give a more friendly suggestion.
## How was this patch tested?
Test using the pyspark shell, without the lowerBound and upperBound parameters.
Author: DjvuLee <lihu@bytedance.com>
Closes#16599 from djvulee/pysparkFix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, PySpark does not work with Python 3.6.0.
Running `./bin/pyspark` simply throws the error as below and PySpark does not work at all:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/shell.py", line 30, in <module>
import pyspark
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/__init__.py", line 46, in <module>
from pyspark.context import SparkContext
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/context.py", line 36, in <module>
from pyspark.java_gateway import launch_gateway
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/java_gateway.py", line 31, in <module>
from py4j.java_gateway import java_import, JavaGateway, GatewayClient
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 961, in _find_and_load
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 950, in _find_and_load_unlocked
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 646, in _load_unlocked
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 616, in _load_backward_compatible
File ".../spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 18, in <module>
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python3/3.6.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/pydoc.py", line 62, in <module>
import pkgutil
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python3/3.6.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/pkgutil.py", line 22, in <module>
ModuleInfo = namedtuple('ModuleInfo', 'module_finder name ispkg')
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/serializers.py", line 394, in namedtuple
cls = _old_namedtuple(*args, **kwargs)
TypeError: namedtuple() missing 3 required keyword-only arguments: 'verbose', 'rename', and 'module'
```
The root cause seems because some arguments of `namedtuple` are now completely keyword-only arguments from Python 3.6.0 (See https://bugs.python.org/issue25628).
We currently copy this function via `types.FunctionType` which does not set the default values of keyword-only arguments (meaning `namedtuple.__kwdefaults__`) and this seems causing internally missing values in the function (non-bound arguments).
This PR proposes to work around this by manually setting it via `kwargs` as `types.FunctionType` seems not supporting to set this.
Also, this PR ports the changes in cloudpickle for compatibility for Python 3.6.0.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested with Python 2.7.6 and Python 3.6.0.
```
./bin/pyspsark
```
, manual creation of `namedtuple` both in local and rdd with Python 3.6.0,
and Jenkins tests for other Python versions.
Also,
```
./run-tests --python-executables=python3.6
```
```
Will test against the following Python executables: ['python3.6']
Will test the following Python modules: ['pyspark-core', 'pyspark-ml', 'pyspark-mllib', 'pyspark-sql', 'pyspark-streaming']
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.tests (192s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.accumulators (3s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.tests (198s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.broadcast (3s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.conf (2s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.context (14s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.classification (21s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.evaluation (11s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.clustering (20s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.linalg.__init__ (0s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.streaming.tests (240s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.tests (240s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.recommendation (19s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.feature (36s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.regression (37s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.tuning (28s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.classification (26s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.evaluation (18s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.clustering (44s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.linalg.__init__ (0s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.feature (26s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.fpm (23s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.random (8s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.tests (92s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.stat.KernelDensity (0s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.linalg.distributed (25s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.stat._statistics (15s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.recommendation (24s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.regression (26s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.profiler (9s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.tree (16s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.shuffle (1s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.util (18s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.serializers (11s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.rdd (20s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.conf (8s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.catalog (17s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.column (18s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.context (18s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.group (27s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.dataframe (33s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.functions (35s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.types (6s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.streaming (13s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.streaming.util (0s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.session (16s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.window (4s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.sql.readwriter (35s)
Tests passed in 433 seconds
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#16429 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19019.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296 , we reached a consensus that we should hide the external/managed table concept to users and only expose custom table path.
This PR renames `Catalog.createExternalTable` to `createTable`(still keep the old versions for backward compatibility), and only set the table type to EXTERNAL if `path` is specified in options.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in `CatalogSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#16528 from cloud-fan/create-table.
Change is for SQLContext to reuse the active SparkSession during construction if the sparkContext supplied is the same as the currently active SparkContext. Without this change, a new SparkSession is instantiated that results in a Derby error when attempting to create a dataframe using a new SQLContext object even though the SparkContext supplied to the new SQLContext is same as the currently active one. Refer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18687 for details on the error and a repro.
Existing unit tests and a new unit test added to pyspark-sql:
/python/run-tests --python-executables=python --modules=pyspark-sql
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Vinayak <vijoshi5@in.ibm.com>
Author: Vinayak Joshi <vijoshi@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16119 from vijoshi/SPARK-18687_master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SparkSession initialization, we store created the instance of SparkSession into a class variable _instantiatedContext. Next time we can use SparkSession.builder.getOrCreate() to retrieve the existing SparkSession instance.
However, when the active SparkContext is stopped and we create another new SparkContext to use, the existing SparkSession is still associated with the stopped SparkContext. So the operations with this existing SparkSession will be failed.
We need to detect such case in SparkSession and renew the class variable _instantiatedContext if needed.
## How was this patch tested?
New test added in PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16454 from viirya/fix-pyspark-sparksession.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes `UserDefinedFunction._broadcast` and `UserDefinedFunction.__del__` method.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16538 from zero323/SPARK-19164.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allow update mode for non-aggregation streaming queries. It will be same as the append mode if a query has no aggregations.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16520 from zsxwing/update-without-agg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add FDR test case in ml/feature/ChiSqSelectorSuite.
Improve some comments in the code.
This is a follow-up pr for #15212.
## How was this patch tested?
ut
Author: Peng, Meng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Closes#16434 from mpjlu/fdr_fwe_update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Copy `GaussianMixture` implementation from mllib to ml, then we can add new features to it.
I left mllib `GaussianMixture` untouched, unlike some other algorithms to wrap the ml implementation. For the following reasons:
- mllib `GaussianMixture` allows k == 1, but ml does not.
- mllib `GaussianMixture` supports setting initial model, but ml does not support currently. (We will definitely add this feature for ml in the future)
We can get around these issues to make mllib as a wrapper calling into ml, but I'd prefer to leave mllib untouched which can make ml clean.
Meanwhile, There is a big performance improvement for `GaussianMixture` in this PR. Since the covariance matrix of multivariate gaussian distribution is symmetric, we can only store the upper triangular part of the matrix and it will greatly reduce the shuffled data size. In my test, this change will reduce shuffled data size by about 50% and accelerate the job execution.
Before this PR:
After this PR:
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and added new tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15413 from yanboliang/spark-17847.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- [X] Make sure all join types are clearly mentioned
- [X] Make join labeling/style consistent
- [X] Make join label ordering docs the same
- [X] Improve join documentation according to above for Scala
- [X] Improve join documentation according to above for Python
- [X] Improve join documentation according to above for R
## How was this patch tested?
No tests b/c docs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Closes#16504 from anabranch/SPARK-19126.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- [X] Fix inconsistencies in function reference for dense rank and dense
- [X] Make all languages equivalent in their reference to `dense_rank` and `rank`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A for docs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Closes#16505 from anabranch/SPARK-19127.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems allowed to not set a key and value for a dict to represent the value is `None` or missing as below:
``` python
spark.createDataFrame([{"x": 1}, {"y": 2}]).show()
```
```
+----+----+
| x| y|
+----+----+
| 1|null|
|null| 2|
+----+----+
```
However, it seems it is not for `Row` as below:
``` python
spark.createDataFrame([Row(x=1), Row(y=2)]).show()
```
``` scala
16/06/19 16:25:56 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 6.0 in stage 66.0 (TID 316)
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Input row doesn't have expected number of values required by the schema. 2 fields are required while 1 values are provided.
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.EvaluatePython$.fromJava(EvaluatePython.scala:147)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$7.apply(SparkSession.scala:656)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$7.apply(SparkSession.scala:656)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$4.apply(SparkPlan.scala:247)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$4.apply(SparkPlan.scala:240)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:780)
```
The behaviour seems right but it seems it might confuse users just like this JIRA was reported.
This PR adds the explanation for `Row` class.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13771 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-13748.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are many locations in the Spark repo where the same word occurs consecutively. Sometimes they are appropriately placed, but many times they are not. This PR removes the inappropriately duplicated words.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A since only docs or comments were updated.
Author: Niranjan Padmanabhan <niranjan.padmanabhan@gmail.com>
Closes#16455 from neurons/np.structure_streaming_doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Univariate feature selection works by selecting the best features based on univariate statistical tests.
FDR and FWE are a popular univariate statistical test for feature selection.
In 2005, the Benjamini and Hochberg paper on FDR was identified as one of the 25 most-cited statistical papers. The FDR uses the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure in this PR. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_discovery_rate.
In statistics, FWE is the probability of making one or more false discoveries, or type I errors, among all the hypotheses when performing multiple hypotheses tests.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family-wise_error_rate
We add FDR and FWE methods for ChiSqSelector in this PR, like it is implemented in scikit-learn.
http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/feature_selection.html#univariate-feature-selection
## How was this patch tested?
ut will be added soon
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Author: Peng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Author: Peng, Meng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Closes#15212 from mpjlu/fdr_fwe.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we only have a SQL interface for recovering all the partitions in the directory of a table and update the catalog. `MSCK REPAIR TABLE` or `ALTER TABLE table RECOVER PARTITIONS`. (Actually, very hard for me to remember `MSCK` and have no clue what it means)
After the new "Scalable Partition Handling", the table repair becomes much more important for making visible the data in the created data source partitioned table.
Thus, this PR is to add it into the Catalog interface. After this PR, users can repair the table by
```Scala
spark.catalog.recoverPartitions("testTable")
```
### How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing test cases.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#16356 from gatorsmile/repairTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds basic TaskContext information to PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests to `tests.py` & existing unit tests.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#16211 from holdenk/SPARK-18576-pyspark-taskcontext.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a timeout failure when using `rdd.toLocalIterator()` or `df.toLocalIterator()` for a PySpark RDD and DataFrame:
df = spark.createDataFrame([[1],[2],[3]])
it = df.toLocalIterator()
row = next(it)
df2 = df.repartition(1000) # create many empty partitions which increase materialization time so causing timeout
it2 = df2.toLocalIterator()
row = next(it2)
The cause of this issue is, we open a socket to serve the data from JVM side. We set timeout for connection and reading through the socket in Python side. In Python we use a generator to read the data, so we only begin to connect the socket once we start to ask data from it. If we don't consume it immediately, there is connection timeout.
In the other side, the materialization time for RDD partitions is unpredictable. So we can't set a timeout for reading data through the socket. Otherwise, it is very possibly to fail.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests into PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16263 from viirya/fix-pyspark-localiterator.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`_to_seq` wasn't imported.
## How was this patch tested?
Added partitionBy to existing write path unit test
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#16297 from brkyvz/SPARK-18888.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now `StreamingQuery.lastProgress` throws NoSuchElementException and it's hard to be used in Python since Python user will just see Py4jError.
This PR just makes it return null instead.
## How was this patch tested?
`test("lastProgress should be null when recentProgress is empty")`
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16273 from zsxwing/SPARK-18852.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated Scala param and Python param to have quotes around the options making it easier for users to read.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually checked the docstrings
Author: krishnakalyan3 <krishnakalyan3@gmail.com>
Closes#16242 from krishnakalyan3/doc-string.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when users use Python UDF in Filter, BatchEvalPython is always generated below FilterExec. However, not all the predicates need to be evaluated after Python UDF execution. Thus, this PR is to push down the determinisitc predicates through `BatchEvalPython`.
```Python
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([(1, "1"), (2, "2"), (1, "2"), (1, "2")], ["key", "value"])
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import udf, col
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import BooleanType
>>> my_filter = udf(lambda a: a < 2, BooleanType())
>>> sel = df.select(col("key"), col("value")).filter((my_filter(col("key"))) & (df.value < "2"))
>>> sel.explain(True)
```
Before the fix, the plan looks like
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter ((isnotnull(value#1) && <lambda>(key#0L)) && (value#1 < 2))
+- LogicalRDD [key#0L, value#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [key#0L, value#1]
+- *Filter ((isnotnull(value#1) && pythonUDF0#9) && (value#1 < 2))
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(key#0L)], [key#0L, value#1, pythonUDF0#9]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[key#0L,value#1]
```
After the fix, the plan looks like
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter ((isnotnull(value#1) && <lambda>(key#0L)) && (value#1 < 2))
+- LogicalRDD [key#0L, value#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [key#0L, value#1]
+- *Filter pythonUDF0#9: boolean
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(key#0L)], [key#0L, value#1, pythonUDF0#9]
+- *Filter (isnotnull(value#1) && (value#1 < 2))
+- Scan ExistingRDD[key#0L,value#1]
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added both unit test cases for `BatchEvalPythonExec` and also add an end-to-end test case in Python test suite.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#16193 from gatorsmile/pythonUDFPredicatePushDown.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes a bug in the python implementation of rdd cartesian product related to batching that showed up in repeated cartesian products with seemingly random results. The root cause being multiple iterators pulling from the same stream in the wrong order because of logic that ignored batching.
`CartesianDeserializer` and `PairDeserializer` were changed to implement `_load_stream_without_unbatching` and borrow the one line implementation of `load_stream` from `BatchedSerializer`. The default implementation of `_load_stream_without_unbatching` was changed to give consistent results (always an iterable) so that it could be used without additional checks.
`PairDeserializer` no longer extends `CartesianDeserializer` as it was not really proper. If wanted a new common super class could be added.
Both `CartesianDeserializer` and `PairDeserializer` now only extend `Serializer` (which has no `dump_stream` implementation) since they are only meant for *de*serialization.
## How was this patch tested?
Additional unit tests (sourced from #14248) plus one for testing a cartesian with zip.
Author: Andrew Ray <ray.andrew@gmail.com>
Closes#16121 from aray/fix-cartesian.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`input_file_name` doesn't return filename when working with UDF in PySpark. An example shows the problem:
from pyspark.sql.functions import *
from pyspark.sql.types import *
def filename(path):
return path
sourceFile = udf(filename, StringType())
spark.read.json("tmp.json").select(sourceFile(input_file_name())).show()
+---------------------------+
|filename(input_file_name())|
+---------------------------+
| |
+---------------------------+
The cause of this issue is, we group rows in `BatchEvalPythonExec` for batching processing of PythonUDF. Currently we group rows first and then evaluate expressions on the rows. If the data is less than the required number of rows for a group, the iterator will be consumed to the end before the evaluation. However, once the iterator reaches the end, we will unset input filename. So the input_file_name expression can't return correct filename.
This patch fixes the approach to group the batch of rows. We evaluate the expression first and then group evaluated results to batch.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16115 from viirya/fix-py-udf-input-filename.
Based on an informal survey, users find this option easier to understand / remember.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#16182 from marmbrus/renameRecentProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Here are the major changes in this PR.
- Added the ability to recover `StreamingQuery.id` from checkpoint location, by writing the id to `checkpointLoc/metadata`.
- Added `StreamingQuery.runId` which is unique for every query started and does not persist across restarts. This is to identify each restart of a query separately (same as earlier behavior of `id`).
- Removed auto-generation of `StreamingQuery.name`. The purpose of name was to have the ability to define an identifier across restarts, but since id is precisely that, there is no need for a auto-generated name. This means name becomes purely cosmetic, and is null by default.
- Added `runId` to `StreamingQueryListener` events and `StreamingQueryProgress`.
Implementation details
- Renamed existing `StreamExecutionMetadata` to `OffsetSeqMetadata`, and moved it to the file `OffsetSeq.scala`, because that is what this metadata is tied to. Also did some refactoring to make the code cleaner (got rid of a lot of `.json` and `.getOrElse("{}")`).
- Added the `id` as the new `StreamMetadata`.
- When a StreamingQuery is created it gets or writes the `StreamMetadata` from `checkpointLoc/metadata`.
- All internal logging in `StreamExecution` uses `(name, id, runId)` instead of just `name`
TODO
- [x] Test handling of name=null in json generation of StreamingQueryProgress
- [x] Test handling of name=null in json generation of StreamingQueryListener events
- [x] Test python API of runId
## How was this patch tested?
Updated unit tests and new unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16113 from tdas/SPARK-18657.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As reported in the Jira, there are some weird issues with exploding Python UDFs in SparkSQL.
The following test code can reproduce it. Notice: the following test code is reported to return wrong results in the Jira. However, as I tested on master branch, it causes exception and so can't return any result.
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import *
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>>
>>> df = spark.range(10)
>>>
>>> def return_range(value):
... return [(i, str(i)) for i in range(value - 1, value + 1)]
...
>>> range_udf = udf(return_range, ArrayType(StructType([StructField("integer_val", IntegerType()),
... StructField("string_val", StringType())])))
>>>
>>> df.select("id", explode(range_udf(df.id))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 318, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20))
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1133, in __call__
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 319, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o126.showString.: java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CodegenSupport$class.consume(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.consume(GenerateExec.scala:57)
The cause of this issue is, in `ExtractPythonUDFs` we insert `BatchEvalPythonExec` to run PythonUDFs in batch. `BatchEvalPythonExec` will add extra outputs (e.g., `pythonUDF0`) to original plan. In above case, the original `Range` only has one output `id`. After `ExtractPythonUDFs`, the added `BatchEvalPythonExec` has two outputs `id` and `pythonUDF0`.
Because the output of `GenerateExec` is given after analysis phase, in above case, it is the combination of `id`, i.e., the output of `Range`, and `col`. But in planning phase, we change `GenerateExec`'s child plan to `BatchEvalPythonExec` with additional output attributes.
It will cause no problem in non wholestage codegen. Because when evaluating the additional attributes are projected out the final output of `GenerateExec`.
However, as `GenerateExec` now supports wholestage codegen, the framework will input all the outputs of the child plan to `GenerateExec`. Then when consuming `GenerateExec`'s output data (i.e., calling `consume`), the number of output attributes is different to the output variables in wholestage codegen.
To solve this issue, this patch only gives the generator's output to `GenerateExec` after analysis phase. `GenerateExec`'s output is the combination of its child plan's output and the generator's output. So when we change `GenerateExec`'s child, its output is still correct.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16120 from viirya/fix-py-udf-with-generator.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQuery.explain and exception to Python.
- Fix StreamingQueryException to not expose `OffsetSeq`.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16125 from zsxwing/py-streaming-explain.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Makes `Window.unboundedPreceding` and `Window.unboundedFollowing` backward compatible.
## How was this patch tested?
Pyspark SQL unittests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16123 from zero323/SPARK-17845-follow-up.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In`JavaWrapper `'s destructor make Java Gateway dereference object in destructor, using `SparkContext._active_spark_context._gateway.detach`
Fixing the copying parameter bug, by moving the `copy` method from `JavaModel` to `JavaParams`
## How was this patch tested?
```scala
import random, string
from pyspark.ml.feature import StringIndexer
l = [(''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_uppercase) for _ in range(10)), ) for _ in range(int(7e5))] # 700000 random strings of 10 characters
df = spark.createDataFrame(l, ['string'])
for i in range(50):
indexer = StringIndexer(inputCol='string', outputCol='index')
indexer.fit(df)
```
* Before: would keep StringIndexer strong reference, causing GC issues and is halted midway
After: garbage collection works as the object is dereferenced, and computation completes
* Mem footprint tested using profiler
* Added a parameter copy related test which was failing before.
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Author: jkbradley <joseph.kurata.bradley@gmail.com>
Closes#15843 from techaddict/SPARK-18274.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
added the new handleInvalid param for these transformers to Python to maintain API parity.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
testing is done with new doctests
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#15817 from techaddict/SPARK-18366.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQueryStatus.json
- Make it not case class (to avoid unnecessarily exposing implicit object StreamingQueryStatus, consistent with StreamingQueryProgress)
- Add StreamingQuery.status to Python
- Fix post-termination status
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16075 from tdas/SPARK-18516-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add python api for KMeansSummary
## How was this patch tested?
unit test added
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#13557 from zjffdu/SPARK-15819.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
make a pass through the items marked as Experimental or DeveloperApi and see if any are stable enough to be unmarked. Also check for items marked final or sealed to see if they are stable enough to be opened up as APIs.
Some discussions in the jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18319
## How was this patch tested?
existing ut
Author: Yuhao <yuhao.yang@intel.com>
Author: Yuhao Yang <hhbyyh@gmail.com>
Closes#15972 from hhbyyh/experimental21.
This PR separates the status of a `StreamingQuery` into two separate APIs:
- `status` - describes the status of a `StreamingQuery` at this moment, including what phase of processing is currently happening and if data is available.
- `recentProgress` - an array of statistics about the most recent microbatches that have executed.
A recent progress contains the following information:
```
{
"id" : "2be8670a-fce1-4859-a530-748f29553bb6",
"name" : "query-29",
"timestamp" : 1479705392724,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303,
"durationMs" : {
"triggerExecution" : 276,
"queryPlanning" : 3,
"getBatch" : 5,
"getOffset" : 3,
"addBatch" : 234,
"walCommit" : 30
},
"currentWatermark" : 0,
"stateOperators" : [ ],
"sources" : [ {
"description" : "KafkaSource[Subscribe[topic-14]]",
"startOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 0,
"4" : 1,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 0
}
},
"endOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 1,
"4" : 2,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 1
}
},
"numRecords" : 3,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303
} ]
}
```
Additionally, in order to make it possible to correlate progress updates across restarts, we change the `id` field from an integer that is unique with in the JVM to a `UUID` that is globally unique.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15954 from marmbrus/queryProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes SparkContext broken state in which it may fall if spark driver get crashed or killed by OOM.
## How was this patch tested?
1. Start SparkContext;
2. Find Spark driver process and `kill -9` it;
3. Call `sc.stop()`;
4. Create new SparkContext after that;
Without this patch you will crash on step 3 and won't be able to do step 4 without manual reset private attibutes or IPython notebook / shell restart.
Author: Alexander Shorin <kxepal@apache.org>
Closes#15961 from kxepal/18523-make-spark-context-stop-more-reliable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove deprecated methods for ML.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15913 from yanboliang/spark-18481.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds two of the newly added methods of `Dataset`s to Python:
`withWatermark` and `checkpoint`
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#15921 from brkyvz/py-watermark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose RDD's localCheckpoint() and associated functions in PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a UnitTest in python/pyspark/tests.py which passes.
I certify that this is my original work, and I license it to the project under the project's open source license.
Gabriel HUANG
Developer at Cardabel (http://cardabel.com/)
Author: Gabriel Huang <gabi.xiaohuang@gmail.com>
Closes#15811 from gabrielhuang/pyspark-localcheckpoint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add model summary APIs for `GaussianMixtureModel` and `BisectingKMeansModel` in pyspark.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: sethah <seth.hendrickson16@gmail.com>
Closes#15777 from sethah/pyspark_cluster_summaries.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I found the documentation for the sample method to be confusing, this adds more clarification across all languages.
- [x] Scala
- [x] Python
- [x] R
- [x] RDD Scala
- [ ] RDD Python with SEED
- [X] RDD Java
- [x] RDD Java with SEED
- [x] RDD Python
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Closes#15815 from anabranch/SPARK-18365.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to provide a pip installable PySpark package. This does a bunch of work to copy the jars over and package them with the Python code (to prevent challenges from trying to use different versions of the Python code with different versions of the JAR). It does not currently publish to PyPI but that is the natural follow up (SPARK-18129).
Done:
- pip installable on conda [manual tested]
- setup.py installed on a non-pip managed system (RHEL) with YARN [manual tested]
- Automated testing of this (virtualenv)
- packaging and signing with release-build*
Possible follow up work:
- release-build update to publish to PyPI (SPARK-18128)
- figure out who owns the pyspark package name on prod PyPI (is it someone with in the project or should we ask PyPI or should we choose a different name to publish with like ApachePySpark?)
- Windows support and or testing ( SPARK-18136 )
- investigate details of wheel caching and see if we can avoid cleaning the wheel cache during our test
- consider how we want to number our dev/snapshot versions
Explicitly out of scope:
- Using pip installed PySpark to start a standalone cluster
- Using pip installed PySpark for non-Python Spark programs
*I've done some work to test release-build locally but as a non-committer I've just done local testing.
## How was this patch tested?
Automated testing with virtualenv, manual testing with conda, a system wide install, and YARN integration.
release-build changes tested locally as a non-committer (no testing of upload artifacts to Apache staging websites)
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <juliet@cloudera.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <not@myemail.com>
Closes#15659 from holdenk/SPARK-1267-pip-install-pyspark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-18459: triggerId seems like a number that should be increasing with each trigger, whether or not there is data in it. However, actually, triggerId increases only where there is a batch of data in a trigger. So its better to rename it to batchId.
SPARK-18460: triggerDetails was missing from json representation. Fixed it.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15895 from tdas/SPARK-18459.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the error message is correct but doesn't provide additional hint to new users. It would be better to hint related configuration to users in the message.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A because it only changes error message.
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15822 from viirya/minor-pyspark-worker-errmsg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we use java serialization for the WAL that stores the offsets contained in each batch. This has two main issues:
It can break across spark releases (though this is not the only thing preventing us from upgrading a running query)
It is unnecessarily opaque to the user.
I'd propose we require offsets to provide a user readable serialization and use that instead. JSON is probably a good option.
## How was this patch tested?
Tests were added for KafkaSourceOffset in [KafkaSourceOffsetSuite](external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceOffsetSuite.scala) and for LongOffset in [OffsetSuite](sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/OffsetSuite.scala)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
zsxwing marmbrus
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@gmail.com>
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@clash.local>
Closes#15626 from tcondie/spark-8360.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Gradient Boosted Tree in R.
With a few minor improvements to RandomForest in R.
Since this is relatively isolated I'd like to target this for branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests, unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15746 from felixcheung/rgbt.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor doc update that should go to master & branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15747 from felixcheung/pySPARK-14393.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Document that Java 7, Python 2.6, Scala 2.10, Hadoop < 2.6 are deprecated in Spark 2.1.0. This does not actually implement any of the change in SPARK-18138, just peppers the documentation with notices about it.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc build
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15733 from srowen/SPARK-18138.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing 'subsamplingRate' of pyspark GBTClassifier
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#15692 from zhengruifeng/gbt_subsamplingRate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Renamed kbest to numTopFeatures
- Renamed alpha to fpr
- Added missing Since annotations
- Doc cleanups
## How was this patch tested?
Added new standardized unit tests for spark.ml.
Improved existing unit test coverage a bit.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#15647 from jkbradley/chisqselector-follow-ups.
