### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `Kafka*Suite`s are flaky because of the Hadoop MiniKdc issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12656
> Looking at MiniKdc implementation, if port is 0, the constructor use ServerSocket to find an unused port, assign the port number to the member variable port and close the ServerSocket object; later, in initKDCServer(), instantiate a TcpTransport object and bind at that port.
> It appears that the port may be used in between, and then throw the exception.
Related test failures are suspected, such as https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122225/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010/KafkaDelegationTokenSuite/_It_is_not_a_test_it_is_a_sbt_testing_SuiteSelector_/
```scala
[info] org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDelegationTokenSuite *** ABORTED *** (15 seconds, 426 milliseconds)
[info] java.net.BindException: Address already in use
[info] at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
[info] at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:433)
[info] at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:425)
[info] at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:223)
[info] at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
[info] at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.NioSocketAcceptor.open(NioSocketAcceptor.java:198)
[info] at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.NioSocketAcceptor.open(NioSocketAcceptor.java:51)
[info] at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoAcceptor.registerHandles(AbstractPollingIoAcceptor.java:547)
[info] at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoAcceptor.access$400(AbstractPollingIoAcceptor.java:68)
[info] at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoAcceptor$Acceptor.run(AbstractPollingIoAcceptor.java:422)
[info] at org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64)
[info] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[info] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[info] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
After comparing the error stack trace with similar issues reported in different projects, such as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3453https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14734
We can be sure that they are caused by the same problem issued in HADOOP-12656.
In the PR, We apply the approach from HBASE first before we finally drop Hadoop 2.7.x
### Why are the changes needed?
fix test flakiness
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
the test itself passing Jenkins
Closes#28442 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31631.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, reorg the `fit` method in LR to several blocks (`createModel`, `createBounds`, `createOptimizer`, `createInitCoefWithInterceptMatrix`);
2, add new param blockSize;
3, if blockSize==1, keep original behavior, code path `trainOnRows`;
4, if blockSize>1, standardize and stack input vectors to blocks (like ALS/MLP), code path `trainOnBlocks`
### Why are the changes needed?
On dense dataset `epsilon_normalized.t`:
1, reduce RAM to persist traing dataset; (save about 40% RAM)
2, use Level-2 BLAS routines; (4x ~ 5x faster)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, a new param is added
### How was this patch tested?
existing and added testsuites
Closes#28458 from zhengruifeng/blockify_lor_II.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup to address the https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28366#discussion_r420611872 by refining the SQL config document.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make developers less confusing.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Only doc change.
Closes#28468 from viirya/SPARK-31365-followup.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace the Avro SQL config `LEGACY_AVRO_REBASE_DATETIME_IN_READ ` by `LEGACY_PARQUET_REBASE_DATETIME_IN_READ ` in `ParquetIOSuite`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avro config is not relevant to the parquet tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `ParquetIOSuite` via
```
./build/sbt "test:testOnly *ParquetIOSuite"
```
Closes#28461 from MaxGekk/fix-conf-in-ParquetIOSuite.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to deprecate 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' configuration and remove it in the future release.
### Why are the changes needed?
This optimization can cause a potential correctness issue, see also SPARK-26709.
Also, it seems difficult to extend the optimization. Basically you should whitelist all available functions. It costs some maintenance overhead, see also SPARK-31590.
Looks we should just better let users use `SparkSessionExtensions` instead if they must use, and remove it in Spark side.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, setting `spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly` will show a deprecation warning:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.unset("spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly")
```
```
20/05/06 12:57:23 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' has been
deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. Avoid to depend on this optimization
to prevent a potential correctness issue. If you must use, use 'SparkSessionExtensions' instead to
inject it as a custom rule.
```
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly", "true")
```
```
20/05/06 12:57:44 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' has been
deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. Avoid to depend on this optimization
to prevent a potential correctness issue. If you must use, use 'SparkSessionExtensions' instead to
inject it as a custom rule.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Closes#28459 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31647.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add VarianceThresholdSelector to PySpark
### Why are the changes needed?
parity between Scala and Python
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
VarianceThresholdSelector is added to PySpark
### How was this patch tested?
new doctest
Closes#28409 from huaxingao/variance_py.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make the non-subquery `AdaptiveSparkPlanExec` update UI again after execute/executeCollect/executeTake/executeTail if the `AdaptiveSparkPlanExec` has subqueries which do not belong to any query stages.
### Why are the changes needed?
If there're subqueries do not belong to any query stages of the main query, the main query could get final physical plan and update UI before those subqueries finished. As a result, the UI can not reflect the change from the subqueries, e.g. new nodes generated from subqueries.
Before:
<img width="335" alt="before_aqe_ui" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16397174/81149758-671a9480-8fb1-11ea-84c4-9a4520e2b08e.png">
After:
<img width="546" alt="after_aqe_ui" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16397174/81149752-63870d80-8fb1-11ea-9852-f41e11afe216.png">
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No(AQE feature hasn't been released).
### How was this patch tested?
Tested manually.
Closes#28460 from Ngone51/fix_aqe_ui.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement abstract Selector. Put the common code among ```ANOVASelector```, ```ChiSqSelector```, ```FValueSelector``` and ```VarianceThresholdSelector``` to Selector.
### Why are the changes needed?
code reuse
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#27978 from huaxingao/spark-31127.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to replace `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED` with `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_V1_SOURCE_LIST` which can configure which v1 data sources are enabled with nested predicate pushdown.
### Why are the changes needed?
We added nested predicate pushdown feature that is configured by `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED`. However, this config is all or nothing config, and applies on all data sources.
In order to not introduce API breaking change after enabling nested predicate pushdown, we'd like to set nested predicate pushdown per data sources. Please also refer to the comments https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27728#discussion_r410829720.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added/Modified unit tests.
Closes#28366 from viirya/SPARK-31365.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`def splitSemiColon` cannot handle unescaped quote mark like "'" or '"' correctly. When there are unmatched quotes in a string, `splitSemiColon` will not drop off semicolon as expected.
### Why are the changes needed?
Some regex expression will use quote mark in string. We should process semicolon correctly.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added Unit test and also manual test.
Closes#28393 from adrian-wang/unescaped.
Authored-by: Daoyuan Wang <me@daoyuan.wang>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add new param `blockSize`;
2, add a new class InstanceBlock;
3, **if `blockSize==1`, keep original behavior; if `blockSize>1`, stack input vectors to blocks (like ALS/MLP);**
4, if `blockSize>1`, standardize the input outside of optimization procedure;
### Why are the changes needed?
1, reduce RAM to persist traing dataset; (save about 40% RAM)
2, use Level-2 BLAS routines; (4x ~ 5x faster on dataset `epsilon`)
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, a new param is added
### How was this patch tested?
existing and added testsuites
Closes#28349 from zhengruifeng/blockify_svc_II.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Metadata-only queries should not include subquery in partition filters.
### Why are the changes needed?
Apply the `OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery` rule again, will get the exception `Cannot evaluate expression: scalar-subquery`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. When `spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly` is enabled, it succeeds when the queries include subquery in partition filters.
### How was this patch tested?
add UT
Closes#28383 from cxzl25/fix_SPARK-31590.
Authored-by: sychen <sychen@ctrip.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make sure the task has nearly reached `context.barrier()` before killing.
### Why are the changes needed?
In case of the task is killed before it reaches `context.barrier()`, the task will not create the expected file.
```
Error Message
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: new java.io.File(dir, killedFlagFile).exists() was false Expect barrier task being killed.
Stacktrace
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: new java.io.File(dir, killedFlagFile).exists() was false Expect barrier task being killed.
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:530)
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:529)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:1560)
at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:503)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.BarrierTaskContextSuite.$anonfun$testBarrierTaskKilled$1(BarrierTaskContextSuite.scala:266)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.BarrierTaskContextSuite.$anonfun$testBarrierTaskKilled$1$adapted(BarrierTaskContextSuite.scala:226)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withTempDir(SparkFunSuite.scala:163)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.BarrierTaskContextSuite.testBarrierTaskKilled(BarrierTaskContextSuite.scala:226)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.BarrierTaskContextSuite.$anonfun$new$29(BarrierTaskContextSuite.scala:277)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
```
[Here's](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122273/testReport/org.apache.spark.scheduler/BarrierTaskContextSuite/barrier_task_killed__interrupt/) the full error messages.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Closes#28454 from Ngone51/fix_kill_interrupt.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds the maven property guava.version which can be
used to control the guava version for a build.
It does not change the current version.
### Why are the changes needed?
All future Hadoop releases are going to be built with a later guava version, including Hadoop 3.1.4. This means to run the spark tests with that release you need to update the spark guava version. This patch lets whoever builds spark do this locally.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ran the hadoop-cloud module tests with the 3.1.4 RC0
```
mvn -T 1 -Phadoop-3.2 -Dhadoop.version=3.1.4 -Psnapshots-and-staging -Phadoop-cloud,yarn,kinesis-asl test --pl hadoop-cloud
```
observed the linkage problem
```
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument(ZLjava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)V
at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.set(Configuration.java:1357)
```
made the version configurable, retested with
```
-Phadoop-3.2 -Dhadoop.version=3.1.4 -Psnapshots-and-staging Dguava.version=27.0-jre
```
all good.
Closes#28455 from steveloughran/SPARK-31644-guava-version.
Authored-by: Steve Loughran <stevel@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Perform days rebasing while converting days from JSON string field. In Spark 2.4 and earlier versions, the days are interpreted as days since the epoch in the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian since 1582-10-15). Since Spark 3.0, the base calendar was switched to Proleptic Gregorian calendar, so, the days should be rebased to represent the same local date.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix a bug and restore compatibility with Spark 2.4 in which:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-01|
+----------+
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-11|
+----------+
```
After:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-01|
+----------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a test to `JsonSuite`.
Closes#28453 from MaxGekk/json-rebase-legacy-days.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skip timestamps rebasing after a global threshold when there is no difference between Julian and Gregorian calendars. This allows to avoid checking hash maps of switch points, and fixes perf regressions in `toJavaTimestamp()` and `fromJavaTimestamp()`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix perf regressions of conversions to/from external type `java.sql.Timestamp`.
Before (see the PR's results https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28440):
```
================================================================================================
Conversion from/to external types
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 on Linux 4.15.0-1063-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Timestamp 376 388 10 13.3 75.2 1.1X
Collect java.sql.Timestamp 1878 1937 64 2.7 375.6 0.2X
```
After:
```
================================================================================================
Conversion from/to external types
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 on Linux 4.15.0-1063-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Timestamp 249 264 24 20.1 49.8 1.7X
Collect java.sql.Timestamp 1503 1523 24 3.3 300.5 0.3X
```
Perf improvements in average of:
1. From java.sql.Timestamp is ~ 34%
2. To java.sql.Timestamps is ~16%
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite` and `RebaseDateTimeSuite`.
Closes#28441 from MaxGekk/opt-rebase-common-threshold.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing an issue where Spark Master UI Fails to load if the application is waiting for workers to launch driver.
**Root Cause:**
This is happening due to the fact that the submitted application is waiting for a worker to be free to run the driver. Due to this resource is set to null in the formatResourcesAddresses method and this is running into null pointer exception.
**Fix:**
Added a null check before forming a resource address and display "None" if the driver isn't launched yet.
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark Master UI should load as expected when applications are waiting for workers to run driver.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The worker column in Spark Master UI will show "None" if the driver hasn't been launched yet.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on a local setup. Launched 2 applications and ensured that Spark Master UI loads fine.
Closes#28429 from akshatb1/MasterUIBug.
Authored-by: Akshat Bordia <akshat.bordia31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `spark.yarn.applicationType` to identify the application type
### Why are the changes needed?
The current application defaults to the SPARK type.
In fact, different types of applications have different characteristics and are suitable for different scenarios.For example: SPAKR-SQL, SPARK-STREAMING.
I recommend distinguishing them by the parameter `spark.yarn.applicationType` so that we can more easily manage and maintain different types of applications.
### How was this patch tested?
1.add UT
2.Tested by verifying Yarn-UI `ApplicationType` in the following cases:
- client and cluster mode
Need additional explanation:
limit cannot exceed 20 characters, can be empty or space
The reasons are as follows:
```
// org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.submitApplication.
if (submissionContext.getApplicationType() == null) {
submissionContext
.setApplicationType(YarnConfiguration.DEFAULT_APPLICATION_TYPE);
} else {
// APPLICATION_TYPE_LENGTH = 20
if (submissionContext.getApplicationType().length() > YarnConfiguration.APPLICATION_TYPE_LENGTH) {
submissionContext.setApplicationType(submissionContext
.getApplicationType().substring(0,
YarnConfiguration.APPLICATION_TYPE_LENGTH));
}
}
```
Closes#28009 from wang-zhun/SPARK-31235.
Authored-by: wang-zhun <wangzhun6103@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, make AFT reuse common functions in `ml.optim`, rather than making its own impl.
### Why are the changes needed?
The logic in optimizing AFT is quite similar to other algorithms like other algs based on `RDDLossFunction`,
We should reuse the common functions.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites
Closes#28404 from zhengruifeng/mv_aft_optim.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If we add UT in hive/SQLQuerySuite or other sql test suites and use table named `test`.
We may meet TableAlreadyExistsException.
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TableAlreadyExistsException: Table or view 'test' already exists in database 'default'
```
The reason is that, there is some tests that does not clean up the tables/views.
In this PR, I add `withTempViews` for these tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix the TableAlreadyExistsException issue when adding an UT, which uses table named `test` or others, in some sql test suites, such as hive/SQLQuerySuite.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existed UT.
Closes#28239 from turboFei/SPARK-31467.
Authored-by: turbofei <fwang12@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add new benchmarks to `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` for reading/writing timestamps of INT96 and TIMESTAMP_MICROS column types. Here are benchmark results for reading timestamps after 1582 year with default settings (rebasing is off for TIMESTAMP_MICROS/TIMESTAMP_MILLIS, and rebasing on for INT96):
timestamp type | vectorized off (ns/row) | vectorized on (ns/row)
--|--|--
TIMESTAMP_MICROS| 160.1 | 50.2
INT96 | 215.6 | 117.8
TIMESTAMP_MILLIS | 159.9 | 60.6
### Why are the changes needed?
To compare default timestamp type `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` with other types in the case if an user decides to switch on them.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the benchmarks via:
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeRebaseBenchmark"
```
in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.7+10 |
Closes#28431 from MaxGekk/parquet-timestamps-DateTimeRebaseBenchmark.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to remove `for testing` from `CleanerListener` class description to promote this private class more clearly.
### Why are the changes needed?
After SPARK-27963 (Allow dynamic allocation without a shuffle service), `CleanerListener` is used in `ExecutorMonitor` during dynamic allocation. Specifically, `CleanerListener.shuffleCleaned` is used.
- https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/dynalloc/ExecutorMonitor.scala#L385-L392
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a private doc-only change.
Closes#28452 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-MINOR.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR follows up https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28194.
As discussed at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28194/files#r418418796.
This PR will improve `ExpressionsSchemaSuite` so that easy to track the diff.
Although `ExpressionsSchemaSuite` at line
b7cde42b04/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ExpressionsSchemaSuite.scala (L165)
just want to compare the total size between expected output size and the newest output size, the scalatest framework will output the extra information contains all the content of expected output and newest output.
This PR will try to avoid this issue.
After this PR, the exception looks like below:
```
[info] - Check schemas for expression examples *** FAILED *** (7 seconds, 336 milliseconds)
[info] 340 did not equal 341 Expected 332 blocks in result file but got 333. Try regenerate the result files. (ExpressionsSchemaSuite.scala:167)
[info] org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException:
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:530)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:529)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:1560)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:503)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.ExpressionsSchemaSuite.$anonfun$new$1(ExpressionsSchemaSuite.scala:167)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Make the exception more concise and clear.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28430 from beliefer/improve-expressions-schema-suite.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 43a73e387c. It sets `INT96` as the timestamp type while saving timestamps to parquet files.
### Why are the changes needed?
To be compatible with Hive and Presto that don't support the `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` type in current stable releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites.
Closes#28450 from MaxGekk/parquet-int96.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to upgrade SLF4J from 1.7.16 to 1.7.30.
### Why are the changes needed?
SLF4J 1.7.23+ is required to enable `slf4j-log4j12` with MDC feature to run under Java 9. Also, this will bring all latest bug fixes.
- http://www.slf4j.org/news.html
> When running under Java 9, log4j version 1.2.x is unable to correctly parse the "java.version" system property. Assuming an inccorect Java version, it proceeded to disable its MDC functionality. The slf4j-log4j12 module shipping in this release fixes the issue by tweaking MDC internals by reflection, allowing log4j to run under Java 9. See also SLF4J-393.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.
Closes#28446 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31633.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SHOW TBLPROPERTIES does not get the correct table properties for tables using the Session Catalog. This PR fixes that, by explicitly falling back to the V1 implementation if the table is in fact a V1 table. We also hide the reserved table properties for V2 tables, as users do not have control over setting these table properties. Henceforth, if they cannot be set or controlled by the user, then they shouldn't be displayed as such.
### Why are the changes needed?
Shows the incorrect table properties, i.e. only what exists in the Hive MetaStore for V2 tables that may have table properties outside of the MetaStore.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fixes a bug
### How was this patch tested?
Regression test
Closes#28434 from brkyvz/ddlCommands.
Authored-by: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed typo in `docs` directory and in `project/MimaExcludes.scala`
### Why are the changes needed?
Better readability of documents
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No test needed
Closes#28447 from kiszk/typo_20200504.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Push the rebase logic to the lower level of the parquet vectorized reader, to make the final code more vectorization-friendly.
### Why are the changes needed?
Parquet vectorized reader is carefully implemented, to make it more likely to be vectorized by the JVM. However, the newly added datetime rebase degrade the performance a lot, as it breaks vectorization, even if the datetime values don't need to rebase (this is very likely as dates before 1582 is rare).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Run part of the `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` locally. The results:
before this patch
```
[info] Load dates from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase off 2677 2838 142 37.4 26.8 1.0X
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase on 3828 4331 805 26.1 38.3 0.7X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase off 2903 2926 34 34.4 29.0 0.9X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase on 4163 4197 38 24.0 41.6 0.6X
[info] Load timestamps from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase off 3537 3627 104 28.3 35.4 1.0X
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase on 6891 7010 105 14.5 68.9 0.5X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase off 3692 3770 72 27.1 36.9 1.0X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase on 7588 7610 30 13.2 75.9 0.5X
```
After this patch
```
[info] Load dates from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase off 2758 2944 197 36.3 27.6 1.0X
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase on 2908 2966 51 34.4 29.1 0.9X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase off 2840 2878 37 35.2 28.4 1.0X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase on 3407 3433 24 29.4 34.1 0.8X
[info] Load timestamps from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase off 3861 4003 139 25.9 38.6 1.0X
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase on 4194 4283 77 23.8 41.9 0.9X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase off 3849 3937 79 26.0 38.5 1.0X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase on 7512 7546 55 13.3 75.1 0.5X
```
Date type is 30% faster if the values don't need to rebase, 20% faster if need to rebase.
Timestamp type is 60% faster if the values don't need to rebase, no difference if need to rebase.
Closes#28406 from cloud-fan/perf.
Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr port [HIVE-10415](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10415): `hive.start.cleanup.scratchdir` configuration is not taking effect.
### Why are the changes needed?
I encountered this issue:
I'd like to make `hive.start.cleanup.scratchdir` effective to reduce this issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#28436 from wangyum/SPARK-31626.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow customized timeouts for `runSparkSubmit`, which will make flaky tests more likely to pass by using a larger timeout value.
I was able to reproduce the test failure on my laptop, which took 1.5 - 2 minutes to finish the test. After increasing the timeout, the test now can pass locally.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows slow tests to use a larger timeout, so they are more likely to succeed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
The test was able to pass on my local env after the change.
Closes#28438 from tianshizz/SPARK-31267.
Authored-by: Tianshi Zhu <zhutianshirea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Changed to the number of rows in benchmark cases from 3 to the actual number `N`.
- Regenerated benchmark results in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10 |
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes are needed to have:
- Correct benchmark results
- Base line for other perf improvements that can be checked in the same environment.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the benchmark and checking its output.
Closes#28440 from MaxGekk/SPARK-31527-DateTimeBenchmark-followup.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Internal usages like `{stop,warning,message}({paste,paste0,sprintf}` and `{stop,warning,message}(some_literal_string_as_variable` have been removed and replaced as appropriate.
### Why are the changes needed?
CRAN policy recommends against using such constructions to build error messages, in particular because it makes the process of creating portable error messages for the package more onerous.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
There may be some small grammatical changes visible in error messaging.
### How was this patch tested?
Not done
Closes#28365 from MichaelChirico/r-stop-paste.
Authored-by: Michael Chirico <michael.chirico@grabtaxi.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set `spark.ui.enabled` to `false` in `SqlBasedBenchmark.getSparkSession`. This disables UI in all SQL benchmarks by default.
### Why are the changes needed?
UI overhead lowers numbers in the `Relative` column and impacts on `Stdev` in benchmark results.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Checked by running `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark`.
Closes#28432 from MaxGekk/ui-off-in-benchmarks.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add FValue example for ml.stat.FValueTest in python/java/scala
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve ML example
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
manually run the example
Closes#28400 from kevinyu98/spark-26111-fvalue-examples.
Authored-by: Qianyang Yu <qyu@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The collect_set() aggregate function should produce a set of distinct elements. When the column argument's type is BinayType this is not the case.
Example:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
case class R(id: String, value: String, bytes: Array[Byte])
def makeR(id: String, value: String) = R(id, value, value.getBytes)
val df = Seq(makeR("a", "dog"), makeR("a", "cat"), makeR("a", "cat"), makeR("b", "fish")).toDF()
// In the example below "bytesSet" erroneously has duplicates but "stringSet" does not (as expected).
df.agg(collect_set('value) as "stringSet", collect_set('bytes) as "byteSet").show(truncate=false)
// The same problem is displayed when using window functions.
val win = Window.partitionBy('id).rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing)
val result = df.select(
collect_set('value).over(win) as "stringSet",
collect_set('bytes).over(win) as "bytesSet"
)
.select('stringSet, 'bytesSet, size('stringSet) as "stringSetSize", size('bytesSet) as "bytesSetSize")
.show()
```
We use a HashSet buffer to accumulate the results, the problem is that arrays equality in Scala don't behave as expected, arrays ara just plain java arrays and the equality don't compare the content of the arrays
Array(1, 2, 3) == Array(1, 2, 3) => False
The result is that duplicates are not removed in the hashset
The solution proposed is that in the last stage, when we have all the data in the Hashset buffer, we delete duplicates changing the type of the elements and then transform it to the original type.
This transformation is only applied when we have a BinaryType
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix the bug explained
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now `collect_set()` correctly deduplicates array of byte.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit testing
Closes#28351 from planga82/feature/SPARK-31500_COLLECT_SET_bug.
Authored-by: Pablo Langa <soypab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The "spark.dynamicAllocation.shuffleTimeout" configuration only takes effect if "spark.dynamicAllocation.shuffleTracking.enabled" is true, so we should re-namespace that configuration so that it's nested under the "shuffleTracking" one.
### How was this patch tested?
Covered by current existing test cases.
Closes#28426 from jiangxb1987/confName.
Authored-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add test cases covering all interval units: MICROSECOND MILLISECOND SECOND MINUTE HOUR DAY WEEK MONTH YEAR
### Why are the changes needed?
For test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Test only.
Closes#28418 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-28424.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I add a new API in pyspark RDD class:
def collectWithJobGroup(self, groupId, description, interruptOnCancel=False)
This API do the same thing with `rdd.collect`, but it can specify the job group when do collect.
The purpose of adding this API is, if we use:
```
sc.setJobGroup("group-id...")
rdd.collect()
```
The `setJobGroup` API in pyspark won't work correctly. This related to a bug discussed in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31549
Note:
This PR is a rather temporary workaround for `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD`, and as a step to migrate to `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD` smoothly. It targets Spark 3.0.
- `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD` is unstable at this moment that affects whole PySpark applications.
- It is impossible to make it runtime configuration as it has to be set before JVM is launched.
- There is a thread leak issue between Python and JVM. We should address but it's not a release blocker for Spark 3.0 since the feature is experimental. I plan to handle this after Spark 3.0 due to stability.
Once `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD` is enabled by default, we should remove this API out ideally. I will target to deprecate this API in Spark 3.1.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix bug.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
A develop API in pyspark: `pyspark.RDD. collectWithJobGroup`
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#28395 from WeichenXu123/collect_with_job_group.
Authored-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some tidying of `sh` scripts in `R/`
### Why are the changes needed?
Not strictly needed, but the `'devtools' %in% installed.packages()` line in particular is "improper" / proabbly slow
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Not
Closes#28419 from MichaelChirico/r-scripts-cleanup.
Authored-by: Michael Chirico <michael.chirico@grabtaxi.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to clean up the markdown file in SHOW COLUMNS page.
- remove the unneeded embedded inline HTML markup by using the basic markdown syntax.
- use the ``` sql for highlighting the SQL syntax.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make the doc cleaner and easily editable by MD editors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
**Before**
**After**
Closes#28414 from gatorsmile/cleanupShowColumns.
Lead-authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix two legacy timestamp formatter `LegacySimpleTimestampFormatter` and `LegacyFastTimestampFormatter` to perform micros rebasing in parsing/formatting from/to strings.
### Why are the changes needed?
Legacy timestamps formatters operate on the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian), so, the input micros should be rebased to have the same date-time fields as in Proleptic Gregorian calendar used by Spark SQL, see SPARK-26651.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `TimestampFormatterSuite`
Closes#28408 from MaxGekk/fix-rebasing-in-legacy-timestamp-formatter.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `CTESubstitution`, resolve CTE relations first, then traverse the main plan only once to substitute CTE relations.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we will traverse the main query many times (if there are many CTE relations), which can be pretty slow if the main query is large.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
local perf test
```
scala> :pa
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
def test(i: Int): Unit = 1.to(i).foreach { _ =>
spark.sql("""
with
t1 as (select 1),
t2 as (select 1),
t3 as (select 1),
t4 as (select 1),
t5 as (select 1),
t6 as (select 1),
t7 as (select 1),
t8 as (select 1),
t9 as (select 1)
select * from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9""").queryExecution.assertAnalyzed()
}
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
test: (i: Int)Unit
scala> test(10000)
scala> println(org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.dumpTimeSpent)
```
The result before this patch
```
Rule Effective Time / Total Time Effective Runs / Total Runs
CTESubstitution 3328796344 / 3924576425 10000 / 20000
```
The result after this patch
```
Rule Effective Time / Total Time Effective Runs / Total Runs
CTESubstitution 1503085936 / 2091992092 10000 / 20000
```
About 2 times faster.
Closes#28407 from cloud-fan/cte.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Rephrase the API doc for `Column.as`
- Simplify the UTs
### Why are the changes needed?
Address comments in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28326
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#28390 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-27340-follow.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Although SPARK-30184 Implement a helper method for aliasing functions, developers always forget to using this improvement.
We need to add more powerful guarantees so that aliases outputed by built-in functions are correct.
This PR extracts the SQL from the example of expressions, and output the SQL and its schema into one golden file.
By checking the golden file, we can find the expressions whose aliases are not displayed correctly, and then fix them.
### Why are the changes needed?
Ensure that the output alias is correct
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28194 from beliefer/check-expression-schema.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix `spark.kubernetes.executor.podNamePrefix` to work.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the configuration is broken like the following.
```
bin/spark-submit \
--master k8s://$K8S_MASTER \
--deploy-mode cluster \
--name spark-pi \
--class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi \
-c spark.kubernetes.container.image=spark:pr \
-c spark.kubernetes.driver.pod.name=mypod \
-c spark.kubernetes.executor.podNamePrefix=mypod \
local:///opt/spark/examples/jars/spark-examples_2.12-3.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
```
**BEFORE SPARK-31601**
```
pod/mypod 1/1 Running 0 9s
pod/spark-pi-7469dd71c499fafb-exec-1 1/1 Running 0 4s
pod/spark-pi-7469dd71c499fafb-exec-2 1/1 Running 0 4s
```
**AFTER SPARK-31601**
```
pod/mypod 1/1 Running 0 8s
pod/mypod-exec-1 1/1 Running 0 3s
pod/mypod-exec-2 1/1 Running 0 3s
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. This is a bug fix. The conf will work as described in the documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins and run the above comment manually.
Closes#28401 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31601.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Because of ebc8fa50d0 and beec8d535f, the SQL output strings for date/timestamp - interval operation will have a malformed format, such as `struct<dateval:date,dateval + (- INTERVAL '2 years 2 months').....`
This PR restore this behavior by adding one `RuntimeReplaceable `implementation for both of the operations to have their pretty SQL strings back.
### Why are the changes needed?
restore the SQL string for datetime operations
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO, we are restoring here
### How was this patch tested?
added unit tests
Closes#28402 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31586-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
