Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xudatabricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support CrossValidatorModel get standard deviation of metrics for each paramMap.
### Why are the changes needed?
So that in mlflow autologging, we can log standard deviation of metrics which is useful.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
`CrossValidatorModel` add a public attribute `stdMetrics` which are the standard deviation of metrics for each paramMap
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#33652 from WeichenXu123/add_std_metric.
Authored-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds type hint for `TaskContext.cpus` added in SPARK-36173 (#33385)
### Why are the changes needed?
To comply with Project Zen.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Confirmed typehint works with IntelliJ IDEA.
Closes#33645 from sarutak/taskcontext-pyi.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
In stage-level resource scheduling, the allocated 3rd party resources can be obtained in TaskContext using resources() interface, however there is no API to get how many cpus are allocated for the task. Will add a cpus() interface to TaskContext to complement resources(). Althrough the task cpu requests can be got from profile, it's more convenient to get it inside the task code without the need to pass profile from driver side to the executor side.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add cpus() interface in TaskContext and modify relevant code.
### Why are the changes needed?
TaskContext has resources() to get 3rd party resources allocated. the is no API to get CPU allocated for the task.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add cpus() interface for TaskContext
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#33385 from xwu99/taskcontext-cpus.
Lead-authored-by: Wu, Xiaochang <xiaochang.wu@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Xiaochang Wu <xiaochang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mridul Muralidharan <mridul<at>gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is followup for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32964, to improve the warning message.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve the warning message.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The warning is changed from "Deprecated in 3.2, Use `spark.to_spark_io` instead." to "Deprecated in 3.2, Use `DataFrame.spark.to_spark_io` instead."
### How was this patch tested?
Manually run `dev/lint-python`
Closes#33631 from itholic/SPARK-35811-followup.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Better error messages for DataTypeOps against lists.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, DataTypeOps against lists throw a Py4JJavaError, we shall throw a TypeError with proper messages instead.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. A TypeError message will be showed rather than a Py4JJavaError.
From:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) > [3, 2, 1]
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o107.gt.
: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unsupported literal type class java.util.ArrayList [3, 2, 1]
...
```
To:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) > [3, 2, 1]
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: The operation can not be applied to list.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33581 from xinrong-databricks/data_type_ops_list.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Disable tests failed by the incompatible behavior of pandas 1.3.
### Why are the changes needed?
Pandas 1.3 has been released.
There are some behavior changes and we should follow it, but it's not ready yet.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Disabled some tests related to the behavior change.
Closes#33598 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36367/disable_tests.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change the `NullType.simpleString` to "void" to set "void" as the formal type name of `NullType`
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR is intended to address the type name discussion in PR #28833. Here are the reasons:
1. The type name of NullType is displayed everywhere, e.g. schema string, error message, document. Hence it's not possible to hide it from users, we have to choose a proper name
2. The "void" is widely used as the type name of "NULL", e.g. Hive, pgSQL
3. Changing to "void" can enable the round trip of `toDDL`/`fromDDL` for NullType. (i.e. make `from_json(col, schema.toDDL)`) work
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the type name of "NULL" is changed from "null" to "void". for example:
```
scala> sql("select null as a, 1 as b").schema.catalogString
res5: String = struct<a:void,b:int>
```
### How was this patch tested?
existing test cases
Closes#33437 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-36224-void-type-name.
Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to migrate Coverage report from Jenkins to GitHub Actions by setting a dailly cron job.
### Why are the changes needed?
For some background, currently PySpark code coverage is being reported in this specific Jenkins job: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.7/
Because of the security issue between [Codecov service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/) and Jenkins machines, we had to work around by manually hosting a coverage site via GitHub pages, see also https://spark-test.github.io/pyspark-coverage-site/ by spark-test account (which is shared to only subset of PMC members).
Since we now run the build via GitHub Actions, we can leverage [Codecov plugin](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action), and remove the workaround we used.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Virtually no. Coverage site (UI) might change but the information it holds should be virtually the same.
### How was this patch tested?
I manually tested:
- Scheduled run: https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/1082261484
- Coverage report: 73f0291a7d/python/pyspark
- Run against a PR: https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/1082367175Closes#33591 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36092.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Observation API (Scala, Java, PySpark) now returns a `Map` / `Dict`. Before, it returned `Row` simply because the metrics are (internal to Observation) retrieved from the listener as rows. Since that is hidden from the user by the Observation API, there is no need to return `Row`.
While touching this code, this moves the unit tests from `DataFrameSuite,scala` to `DatasetSuite.scala` and from `JavaDataFrameSuite.java` to `JavaDatasetSuite.java`, which is a better place.
### Why are the changes needed?
This simplifies the API and accessing the metrics, especially in Java. There is no need for the concept `Row` when retrieving the observation result.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it changes the return type of `get` from `Row` to `Map` (Scala) / `Dict` (Python) and introduces `getAsJavaMap` (Java).
### How was this patch tested?
This is tested in `DatasetSuite.SPARK-34806: observation on datasets`, `JavaDatasetSuite.testObservation` and `test_dataframe.test_observe`.
Closes#33545 from EnricoMi/branch-observation-returns-map.
Authored-by: Enrico Minack <github@enrico.minack.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch set value to `<NA>` (pd.NA) in BooleanExtensionOps and StringExtensionOps.
### Why are the changes needed?
The pandas behavior:
```python
>>> pd.Series([True, False, None], dtype="boolean").astype(str).tolist()
['True', 'False', '<NA>']
>>> pd.Series(['s1', 's2', None], dtype="string").astype(str).tolist()
['1', '2', '<NA>']
```
pandas on spark
```python
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> from pyspark import pandas as ps
# Before
>>> ps.from_pandas(pd.Series([True, False, None], dtype="boolean")).astype(str).tolist()
['True', 'False', 'None']
>>> ps.from_pandas(pd.Series(['s1', 's2', None], dtype="string")).astype(str).tolist()
['True', 'False', 'None']
# After
>>> ps.from_pandas(pd.Series([True, False, None], dtype="boolean")).astype(str).tolist()
['True', 'False', '<NA>']
>>> ps.from_pandas(pd.Series(['s1', 's2', None], dtype="string")).astype(str).tolist()
['s1', 's2', '<NA>']
```
See more in [SPARK-35976](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35976)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, return `<NA>` when None to follow the pandas behavior
### How was this patch tested?
Change the ut to cover this scenario.
Closes#33585 from Yikun/SPARK-35976.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove old workarounds related to null ordering.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pandas-on-Spark, there are still some remaining places to call `Column._jc.(asc|desc)_nulls_(first|last)` as a workaround from Koalas to support Spark 2.3.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Modified a couple of tests and existing tests.
Closes#33597 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36365/nulls_first_last.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33570, which mistakenly changed the default value of the default index
### Why are the changes needed?
It was mistakenly changed. It was changed to check if the tests actually pass but I forgot to change it back.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's not related yet. It fixes up the mistake of the default value mistakenly changed.
(Changed default value makes the test flaky because of the order affected by extra shuffle)
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Closes#33596 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36338-followup.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move some logic related to `F.nanvl` to `DataTypeOps`.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are several places to branch by `FloatType` or `DoubleType` to use `F.nanvl` but `DataTypeOps` should handle it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33582 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36350/nan_to_null.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to implement `distributed-sequence` index in Scala side.
### Why are the changes needed?
- Avoid unnecessary (de)serialization
- Keep the nullability in the input DataFrame when `distributed-sequence` is enabled. During the serialization, all fields are being nullable for now (see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32775#discussion_r645882104)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No to end users since pandas API on Spark is not released yet.
```python
import pyspark.pandas as ps
ps.set_option('compute.default_index_type', 'distributed-sequence')
ps.range(1).spark.print_schema()
```
Before:
```
root
|-- id: long (nullable = true)
```
After:
```
root
|-- id: long (nullable = false)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and existing tests should cover them.
Closes#33570 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36338.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a partial revert of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33567 that keeps the logic to skip mlflow related tests if that's not installed.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's consistent with other libraries, e.g) PyArrow.
It also fixes up the potential dev breakage (see also https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33567#issuecomment-889841829)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a partial revert. CI should test it out too.
Closes#33589 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36254.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes adding a Python package, `mlflow` and `sklearn` to enable the MLflow test in pandas API on Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
To enable the MLflow test in pandas API on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's test-only
### How was this patch tested?
Manually test on local, with `python/run-tests --testnames pyspark.pandas.mlflow`.
Closes#33567 from itholic/SPARK-36254.
Lead-authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Haejoon Lee <44108233+itholic@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is follow-up for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33414 to support the more options for `mode` argument for all APIs that has `mode` argument, not only `DataFrame.to_csv`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep the usage consistency for the arguments that have same name.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
More options is available for all APIs that has `mode` argument, same as `DataFrame.to_csv`
### How was this patch tested?
Manually test on local
Closes#33569 from itholic/SPARK-35085-followup.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reuse `IndexOpsMixin.isnull()` where the null check is needed.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are some places where we can reuse `IndexOpsMixin.isnull()` instead of directly using Spark `Column`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33562 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36333/reuse_isnull.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the error message for wrong type when calling dropDuplicates in pyspark.
### Why are the changes needed?
The current error message is cryptic and can be unclear to less experienced users.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it adds a type error for when a user gives the wrong type to dropDuplicates
### How was this patch tested?
There is currently no testing for error messages in pyspark dataframe functions
Closes#33364 from sammyjmoseley/sm/add-type-checking-for-drop-duplicates.
Lead-authored-by: Samuel Moseley <smoseley@palantir.com>
Co-authored-by: Sammy Moseley <moseley.sammy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the rest of DataTypeOps tests by avoiding joins.
### Why are the changes needed?
bool, string, numeric DataTypeOps tests have been improved by avoiding joins.
We should improve the rest of the DataTypeOps tests in the same way.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33546 from xinrong-databricks/test_no_join.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust `astype` of fractional Series with missing values to follow pandas.
Non-goal: Adjust the issue of `astype` of Decimal Series with missing values to follow pandas.
### Why are the changes needed?
`astype` of fractional Series with missing values doesn't behave the same as pandas, for example, float Series returns itself when `astype` integer, while a ValueError is raised in pandas.
We ought to follow pandas.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
From:
```py
>>> import numpy as np
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, 2, np.nan])
>>> psser.astype(int)
0 1.0
1 2.0
2 NaN
dtype: float64
```
To:
```py
>>> import numpy as np
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, 2, np.nan])
>>> psser.astype(int)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: Cannot convert fractions with missing values to integer
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33466 from xinrong-databricks/extension_astype.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix `Series`/`Index.copy()` to drop extra columns.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently `Series`/`Index.copy()` keeps the copy of the anchor DataFrame which holds unnecessary columns.
We can drop those when `Series`/`Index.copy()`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33549 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36320/index_ops_copy.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix `IndexOpsMixin.hasnans` to use `IndexOpsMixin.isnull().any()`.
### Why are the changes needed?
`IndexOpsMixin.hasnans` has a potential issue to cause `a window function inside an aggregate function` error.
Also it returns a wrong value when the `Series`/`Index` is empty.
```py
>>> ps.Series([]).hasnans
None
```
whereas:
```py
>>> pd.Series([]).hasnans
False
```
`IndexOpsMixin.any()` is safe for both cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`IndexOpsMixin.hasnans` will return `False` when empty.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33547 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36310/hasnan.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With SPARK-34806 we can now easily add an equivalent for `Dataset.observe(Observation, Column, Column*)` to PySpark's `DataFrame` API.
### Why are the changes needed?
This further aligns the Python DataFrame API with Scala Dataset API.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it adds the `Observation` class and the `DataFrame.observe` method.
### How was this patch tested?
Adds test `test_observe` to `pyspark.sql.test.test_dataframe`.
Closes#33484 from EnricoMi/branch-observation-python.
Authored-by: Enrico Minack <github@enrico.minack.dev>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
The following code should type-check:
```python3
import uuid
import pyspark.sql.functions as F
my_udf = F.udf(lambda: str(uuid.uuid4())).asNondeterministic()
```
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `udf` function should return a more specific type.
### Why are the changes needed?
Right now, `mypy` will throw spurious errors, such as for the code given above.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
This was not tested. Sorry, I am not very familiar with this repo -- are there any typing tests?
Closes#33399 from luranhe/patch-1.
Lead-authored-by: Luran He <luranjhe@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Luran He <luran.he@compass.com>
Signed-off-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update api usage examples on PySpark pandas API documents.
### Why are the changes needed?
If users try to use PySpark pandas API from the document, they will see some API deprication warnings.
It is kind for users to update those documents to avoid confusion.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
```
make html
```
Closes#33519 from yoda-mon/update-pyspark-configurations.
Authored-by: Leona <yodal@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
- Clean up the classes
- Add deprecation warnings
- Clean up the docs
### Why are the changes needed?
To finalize the series of PRs for `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`, we should clean up the classes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33528 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36267/cleanup.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set the result to 1 when the exp with 0(or False).
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, exponentiation between fractional series and bools is not consistent with pandas' behavior.
```
>>> pser = pd.Series([1, 2, np.nan], dtype=float)
>>> psser = ps.from_pandas(pser)
>>> pser ** False
0 1.0
1 1.0
2 1.0
dtype: float64
>>> psser ** False
0 1.0
1 1.0
2 NaN
dtype: float64
```
We ought to adjust that.
See more in [SPARK-36142](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36142)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it introduces a user-facing change, resulting in a different result for pow between fractional Series with missing values and bool literal, the results follow pandas behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
- Add test_pow_with_float_nan ut
- Exsiting test in test_pow
Closes#33521 from Yikun/SPARK-36142.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add set_categories to CategoricalAccessor and CategoricalIndex.
### Why are the changes needed?
set_categories is supported in pandas CategoricalAccessor and CategoricalIndex. We ought to follow pandas.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use `set_categories`.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33506 from xinrong-databricks/set_categories.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changing references to Dataset in python docstrings to DataFrame
### Why are the changes needed?
no Dataset class in pyspark
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Doc change only
Closes#33438 from dominikgehl/feature/SPARK-36225.
Lead-authored-by: Dominik Gehl <dog@open.ch>
Co-authored-by: Dominik Gehl <gehl@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix `lint-python` to pick `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` from the environment variable first to switch the Python and explicitly specify `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to use `python3.9` in CI.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently `lint-python` uses `python3`, but it's not the one we expect in CI.
As a result, `black` check is not working.
```
The python3 -m black command was not found. Skipping black checks for now.
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The `black` check in `lint-python` should work.
Closes#33507 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36279/lint-python.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix equality comparison of unordered Categoricals.
### Why are the changes needed?
Codes of a Categorical Series are used for Series equality comparison. However, that doesn't apply to unordered Categoricals, where the same value can have different codes in two same categories in a different order.
So we should map codes to value respectively and then compare the equality of value.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
From:
```py
>>> psser1 = ps.Series(pd.Categorical(list("abca")))
>>> psser2 = ps.Series(pd.Categorical(list("bcaa"), categories=list("bca")))
>>> with ps.option_context("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True):
... (psser1 == psser2).sort_index()
...
0 True
1 True
2 True
3 False
dtype: bool
```
To:
```py
>>> psser1 = ps.Series(pd.Categorical(list("abca")))
>>> psser2 = ps.Series(pd.Categorical(list("bcaa"), categories=list("bca")))
>>> with ps.option_context("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True):
... (psser1 == psser2).sort_index()
...
0 False
1 False
2 False
3 True
dtype: bool
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33497 from xinrong-databricks/cat_bug.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `reorder_categories` to `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should implement `reorder_categories` in `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use `reorder_categories`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33499 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36264/reorder_categories.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
additional links to other classes in python documentation
### Why are the changes needed?
python docstring syntax wasn't fully used everywhere
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Documentation change only
Closes#33440 from dominikgehl/feature/python-docstrings.
Authored-by: Dominik Gehl <dog@open.ch>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Exposing functionExists in pyspark sql catalog
### Why are the changes needed?
method was available in scala but not pyspark
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Additional method
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#33481 from dominikgehl/SPARK-36258.
Authored-by: Dominik Gehl <dog@open.ch>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `remove_unused_categories` to `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should implement `remove_unused_categories` in `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use `remove_unused_categories`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33485 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36261/remove_unused_categories.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve bool, string, numeric DataTypeOps tests by avoiding joins.
Previously, bool, string, numeric DataTypeOps tests are conducted between two different Series.
After the PR, bool, string, numeric DataTypeOps tests should perform on a single DataFrame.
### Why are the changes needed?
A considerable number of DataTypeOps tests have operations on different Series, so joining is needed, which takes a long time.
We shall avoid joins for a shorter test duration.
The majority of joins happen in bool, string, numeric DataTypeOps tests, so we improve them first.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#33402 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_diffframe.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use `Column.__getitem__` instead of `Column.getItem` to suppress warnings.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pandas API on Spark code base, there are some places using `Column.getItem` with `Column` object, but it shows a deprecation warning.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users won't see the warnings anymore.
- before
```py
>>> s = ps.Series(list("abbccc"), dtype="category")
>>> s.astype(str)
/path/to/spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py:322: FutureWarning: A column as 'key' in getItem is deprecated as of Spark 3.0, and will not be supported in the future release. Use `column[key]` or `column.key` syntax instead.
warnings.warn(
0 a
1 b
2 b
3 c
4 c
5 c
dtype: object
```
- after
```py
>>> s = ps.Series(list("abbccc"), dtype="category")
>>> s.astype(str)
0 a
1 b
2 b
3 c
4 c
5 c
dtype: object
```
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33486 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36265/getitem.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes removing some APIs from pandas-on-Spark documentation.
Because they can be easily workaround via Spark DataFrame or Column functions, so they might be removed In the future.
### Why are the changes needed?
Because we don't want to expose some functions as a public API.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The APIs such as `(Series|Index).spark.data_type`, `(Series|Index).spark.nullable`, `DataFrame.spark.schema`, `DataFrame.spark.print_schema`, `DataFrame.pandas_on_spark.attach_id_column`, `DataFrame.spark.checkpoint`, `DataFrame.spark.localcheckpoint` and `DataFrame.spark.explain` is removed in the documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually build the documents.
Closes#33458 from itholic/SPARK-36239.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Additional tests for pyspark tableExists with regard to views and temporary views
### Why are the changes needed?
scala documentation indicates that tableExists works for tables/view and also temporary views. This unit tests try to verify that claim. While views seem ok, temporary views don't seem to work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
tests
Closes#33461 from dominikgehl/bug/SPARK-36243.
Lead-authored-by: Dominik Gehl <dog@open.ch>
Co-authored-by: Dominik Gehl <gehl@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR follows up #33379 to fix build error in Sphinx
### Why are the changes needed?
The Sphinx build is failed with missing newline in docstring
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually test the Sphinx build
Closes#33479 from itholic/SPARK-35810-followup.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes adding an argument `index_col` for `ps.sql` function, to preserve the index when users want.
NOTE that the `reset_index()` have to be performed before using `ps.sql` with `index_col`.
```python
>>> psdf
A B
a 1 4
b 2 5
c 3 6
>>> psdf_reset_index = psdf.reset_index()
>>> ps.sql("SELECT * from {psdf_reset_index} WHERE A > 1", index_col="index")
A B
index
b 2 5
c 3 6
```
Otherwise, the index is always lost.
```python
>>> ps.sql("SELECT * from {psdf} WHERE A > 1")
A B
0 2 5
1 3 6
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Index is one of the key object for the existing pandas users, so we should provide the way to keep the index after computing the `ps.sql`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the new argument is added.
### How was this patch tested?
Add a unit test and manually check the build pass.
Closes#33450 from itholic/SPARK-35809.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `remove_categories` to `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should implement `remove_categories` in `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use `remove_categories`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33474 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36249/remove_categories.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `add_categories` to `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should implement `add_categories` in `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use `add_categories`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33470 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36214/add_categories.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the version that added pandas API on Spark in PySpark documentation.
### Why are the changes needed?
To document the version added.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No to end user. Spark 3.2 is not released yet.
### How was this patch tested?
Linter and documentation build.
Closes#33473 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36253.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add categories setter to `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should implement categories setter in `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use categories setter.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33448 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36188/categories_setter.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `as_ordered`/`as_unordered` to `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should implement `as_ordered`/`as_unordered` in `CategoricalAccessor` and `CategoricalIndex` yet.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will be able to use `as_ordered`/`as_unordered`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Closes#33400 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-36186/as_ordered_unordered.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose databaseExists in pyspark.sql.catalog
### Why are the changes needed?
Was available in scala, but not in pyspark
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
New method databaseExists
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in codebase
Closes#33416 from dominikgehl/feature/SPARK-36207.
Lead-authored-by: Dominik Gehl <dog@open.ch>
Co-authored-by: Dominik Gehl <gehl@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test is flaky (https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3109815586):
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 391, in test_parameter_convergence
eventually(condition, catch_assertions=True)
File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 91, in eventually
raise lastValue
File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 82, in eventually
lastValue = condition()
File "/__w/spark/spark/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 387, in condition
self.assertEqual(len(model_weights), len(batches))
AssertionError: 9 != 10
```
Should probably increase timeout
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid flakiness in the test.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Nope, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
CI should test it out.
Closes#33427 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36216.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
