## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
There are 4 places we need to deal with NaN and -0.0:
1. comparison expressions. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
2. Join keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
3. grouping keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be assigned to the same group. Different NaNs should be assigned to the same group.
4. window partition keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
The case 1 is OK. Our comparison already handles NaN and -0.0, and for struct/array/map, we will recursively compare the fields/elements.
Case 2, 3 and 4 are problematic, as they compare `UnsafeRow` binary directly, and different NaNs have different binary representation, and the same thing happens for -0.0 and 0.0.
To fix it, a simple solution is: normalize float/double when building unsafe data (`UnsafeRow`, `UnsafeArrayData`, `UnsafeMapData`). Then we don't need to worry about it anymore.
Following this direction, this PR moves the handling of NaN and -0.0 from `Platform` to `UnsafeWriter`, so that places like `UnsafeRow.setFloat` will not handle them, which reduces the perf overhead. It's also easier to add comments explaining why we do it in `UnsafeWriter`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23239 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
bdf32847b1