Maxim Gekk 2409320d8f [SPARK-29237][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Ignore SET commands in expression examples while checking the _FUNC_ pattern ... ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The `SET` commands do not contain the `_FUNC_` pattern a priori. In the PR, I propose filter out such commands in the `using _FUNC_ instead of function names in examples` test. ### Why are the changes needed? After the merge of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25942, examples will require particular settings. Currently, the whole expression example has to be ignored which is so much. It makes sense to ignore only `SET` commands in expression examples. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? By running the `using _FUNC_ instead of function names in examples` test. Closes #25958 from MaxGekk/dont-check-_FUNC_-in-set. Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>		2019-09-29 08:51:47 +09:00
..
benchmarks	[SPARK-29200][SQL] Optimize extract/date_part for epoch	2019-09-22 16:59:59 +09:00
src	[SPARK-29237][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Ignore SET commands in expression examples while checking the _FUNC_ pattern	2019-09-29 08:51:47 +09:00
v1.2.1/src	[SPARK-28744][SQL][TEST] rename SharedSQLContext to SharedSparkSession	2019-08-19 19:01:56 +08:00
v2.3.5/src	[SPARK-28744][SQL][TEST] rename SharedSQLContext to SharedSparkSession	2019-08-19 19:01:56 +08:00
pom.xml	[SPARK-27521][SQL] Move data source v2 to catalyst module	2019-06-05 09:55:55 -07:00