4ca31b470f
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add additional constructor in the `Like` expression. The constructor can be used on applying the `like` function with 2 parameters.
### Why are the changes needed?
`FunctionRegistry` cannot find a constructor if the `like` function is applied to 2 parameters.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, before:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT like('Spark', '_park');
Invalid arguments for function like; line 1 pos 7
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Invalid arguments for function like; line 1 pos 7
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.FunctionRegistry$.$anonfun$expression$7(FunctionRegistry.scala:618)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:189)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.FunctionRegistry$.$anonfun$expression$4(FunctionRegistry.scala:602)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.SimpleFunctionRegistry.lookupFunction(FunctionRegistry.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.SessionCatalog.lookupFunction(SessionCatalog.scala:1412)
```
After:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT like('Spark', '_park');
true
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running `check outputs of expression examples` from `SQLQuerySuite`.
Closes #27323 from MaxGekk/fix-like-func.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| src | ||
| v1.2/src | ||
| v2.3/src | ||
| pom.xml | ||