RoryQi 57ce64c511 [SPARK-35706][SQL] Consider making the ':' in STRUCT data type definition optional ... ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The STRUCT type syntax is defined like this: STRUCT(fieldNmae: fileType [NOT NULL][COMMENT stringLiteral][,.....]) So the field list is nearly the same as a column list if we could make ':' optional it would be so much cleaner an less proprietary ### Why are the changes needed? ease of use ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, you can use Struct type list is nearly the same as a column list ### How was this patch tested? unit tests Closes #32858 from jerqi/master. Authored-by: RoryQi <1242949407@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>		2021-06-11 12:58:32 +00:00
..
benchmarks	[SPARK-34950][TESTS] Update benchmark results to the ones created by GitHub Actions machines	2021-04-03 23:02:56 +03:00
src	[SPARK-35706][SQL] Consider making the ':' in STRUCT data type definition optional	2021-06-11 12:58:32 +00:00
pom.xml	[SPARK-33212][BUILD] Upgrade to Hadoop 3.2.2 and move to shaded clients for Hadoop 3.x profile	2021-01-15 14:06:50 -08:00