5c1567ba97
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a followup from discussion in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32495#discussion_r632283178 . The hardcoded function name `findNextJoinRows` is not a real problem now as we always do code generation for SMJ's children separately. But this change is to make it future proof in case this assumption changed in the future. ### Why are the changes needed? Fix the potential reliability issue. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Existing unit tests. Closes #32548 from c21/smj-followup. Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| src | ||
| pom.xml | ||