## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a concern that Spark-side codegen row-by-row filtering might be faster than Parquet's one in general due to type-boxing and additional fuction calls which Spark's one tries to avoid.
So, this PR adds an option to disable/enable record-by-record filtering in Parquet side.
It sets the default to `false` to take the advantage of the improvement.
This was also discussed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14671.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually benchmarks were performed. I generated a billion (1,000,000,000) records and tested equality comparison concatenated with `OR`. This filter combinations were made from 5 to 30.
It seem indeed Spark-filtering is faster in the test case and the gap increased as the filter tree becomes larger.
The details are as below:
**Code**
``` scala
test("Parquet-side filter vs Spark-side filter - record by record") {
withTempPath { path =>
val N = 1000 * 1000 * 1000
val df = spark.range(N).toDF("a")
df.write.parquet(path.getAbsolutePath)
val benchmark = new Benchmark("Parquet-side vs Spark-side", N)
Seq(5, 10, 20, 30).foreach { num =>
val filterExpr = (0 to num).map(i => s"a = $i").mkString(" OR ")
benchmark.addCase(s"Parquet-side filter - number of filters [$num]", 3) { _ =>
withSQLConf(SQLConf.PARQUET_VECTORIZED_READER_ENABLED.key -> false.toString,
SQLConf.PARQUET_RECORD_FILTER_ENABLED.key -> true.toString) {
// We should strip Spark-side filter to compare correctly.
stripSparkFilter(
spark.read.parquet(path.getAbsolutePath).filter(filterExpr)).count()
}
}
benchmark.addCase(s"Spark-side filter - number of filters [$num]", 3) { _ =>
withSQLConf(SQLConf.PARQUET_VECTORIZED_READER_ENABLED.key -> false.toString,
SQLConf.PARQUET_RECORD_FILTER_ENABLED.key -> false.toString) {
spark.read.parquet(path.getAbsolutePath).filter(filterExpr).count()
}
}
}
benchmark.run()
}
}
```
**Result**
```
Parquet-side vs Spark-side: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [5] 4268 / 4367 234.3 4.3 0.8X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [5] 3709 / 3741 269.6 3.7 0.9X
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [10] 5673 / 5727 176.3 5.7 0.6X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [10] 3588 / 3632 278.7 3.6 0.9X
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [20] 8024 / 8440 124.6 8.0 0.4X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [20] 3912 / 3946 255.6 3.9 0.8X
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [30] 11936 / 12041 83.8 11.9 0.3X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [30] 3929 / 3978 254.5 3.9 0.8X
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#15049 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17310.
673c670465