spark-instrumented-optimizer/sql/core/benchmarks/ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark-results.txt
Dongjoon Hyun 854a0f752e [SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare sql/core module in JDK8/11 (Part 1)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison.

**A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)**
- [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case)
- [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC)
- [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases)
- [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`)
- [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type)
- [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases)
- [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS)
- [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster)
- [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases)
- [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases)
- [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases)
- [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster)
- [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case)
- [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small)
- [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case)
- [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases)

**B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER**
- [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general)
- [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`)
- [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general)
- [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`)
- [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases)
- [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases)
- [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower)
- [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases)
- [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case)

`FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer.

### Why are the changes needed?

According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11.
This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible  environment, the following environment is used.
- Instance: `r3.xlarge`
- OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)`
- JDK:
  - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)`
  - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)`

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark.

Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 08:58:25 -07:00

54 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext

================================================================================================
Nested Schema Pruning Benchmark For Parquet
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_222-b10 on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Selection: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top-level column 149 183 22 6.7 148.8 1.0X
Nested column 413 436 20 2.4 413.4 0.4X
Nested column in array 1309 1327 24 0.8 1308.9 0.1X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_222-b10 on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Limiting: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top-level column 160 184 17 6.3 159.5 1.0X
Nested column 436 481 77 2.3 436.5 0.4X
Nested column in array 1354 1381 26 0.7 1353.6 0.1X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_222-b10 on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Repartitioning: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top-level column 378 412 61 2.6 378.0 1.0X
Nested column 744 790 51 1.3 744.0 0.5X
Nested column in array 1915 1987 76 0.5 1915.0 0.2X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_222-b10 on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Repartitioning by exprs: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top-level column 389 407 16 2.6 388.6 1.0X
Nested column 3152 3217 48 0.3 3151.9 0.1X
Nested column in array 3698 3860 274 0.3 3698.2 0.1X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_222-b10 on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Sample: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top-level column 143 170 27 7.0 142.7 1.0X
Nested column 450 461 8 2.2 449.9 0.3X
Nested column in array 1411 1460 41 0.7 1411.2 0.1X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_222-b10 on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Sorting: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top-level column 293 309 22 3.4 292.9 1.0X
Nested column 2109 2142 19 0.5 2109.1 0.1X
Nested column in array 3018 3096 79 0.3 3017.7 0.1X