## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following code:
```
val ds = Seq(("a", 1), ("b", 2), ("c", 3)).toDS()
ds.filter(_._1 == "b").select(expr("_1").as[String]).foreach(println(_))
```
throws an Exception:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: _1#420
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
...
Cause: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find _1#420 in [_1#416,_2#417]
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
...
```
This is because `EmbedSerializerInFilter` rule drops the `exprId`s of output of surrounded `SerializeFromObject`.
The analyzed and optimized plans of the above example are as follows:
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
_1: string
Project [_1#420]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, scala.Tuple2]._1, true) AS _1#420,input[0, scala.Tuple2]._2 AS _2#421]
+- Filter <function1>.apply
+- DeserializeToObject newInstance(class scala.Tuple2), obj#419: scala.Tuple2
+- LocalRelation [_1#416,_2#417], [[0,1800000001,1,61],[0,1800000001,2,62],[0,1800000001,3,63]]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
!Project [_1#420]
+- Filter <function1>.apply
+- LocalRelation [_1#416,_2#417], [[0,1800000001,1,61],[0,1800000001,2,62],[0,1800000001,3,63]]
```
This PR fixes `EmbedSerializerInFilter` rule to keep `exprId`s of output of surrounded `SerializeFromObject`.
The plans after this patch are as follows:
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
_1: string
Project [_1#420]
+- SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, scala.Tuple2]._1, true) AS _1#420,input[0, scala.Tuple2]._2 AS _2#421]
+- Filter <function1>.apply
+- DeserializeToObject newInstance(class scala.Tuple2), obj#419: scala.Tuple2
+- LocalRelation [_1#416,_2#417], [[0,1800000001,1,61],[0,1800000001,2,62],[0,1800000001,3,63]]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#416]
+- Filter <function1>.apply
+- LocalRelation [_1#416,_2#417], [[0,1800000001,1,61],[0,1800000001,2,62],[0,1800000001,3,63]]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and I added a test to check if `filter and then select` works.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#13096 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-15313.
d5e1c5acde