spark-instrumented-optimizer/sql/core/benchmarks/DatasetBenchmark-jdk11-results.txt
Dongjoon Hyun 854a0f752e [SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare sql/core module in JDK8/11 (Part 1)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison.

**A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)**
- [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case)
- [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC)
- [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases)
- [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`)
- [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type)
- [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases)
- [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS)
- [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster)
- [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases)
- [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases)
- [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases)
- [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster)
- [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case)
- [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small)
- [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case)
- [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases)

**B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER**
- [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general)
- [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`)
- [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general)
- [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`)
- [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases)
- [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases)
- [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower)
- [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases)
- [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case)

`FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer.

### Why are the changes needed?

According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11.
This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible  environment, the following environment is used.
- Instance: `r3.xlarge`
- OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)`
- JDK:
  - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)`
  - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)`

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark.

Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 08:58:25 -07:00

47 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext

================================================================================================
Dataset Benchmark
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.4+11-LTS on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
back-to-back map long: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RDD 14574 14759 261 6.9 145.7 1.0X
DataFrame 2468 2655 264 40.5 24.7 5.9X
Dataset 3498 3533 50 28.6 35.0 4.2X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.4+11-LTS on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
back-to-back map: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RDD 17877 18133 361 5.6 178.8 1.0X
DataFrame 5968 5991 33 16.8 59.7 3.0X
Dataset 12638 12859 313 7.9 126.4 1.4X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.4+11-LTS on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
back-to-back filter Long: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RDD 3399 3464 92 29.4 34.0 1.0X
DataFrame 1609 1628 28 62.2 16.1 2.1X
Dataset 3637 3648 16 27.5 36.4 0.9X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.4+11-LTS on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
back-to-back filter: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RDD 4850 4859 13 20.6 48.5 1.0X
DataFrame 211 244 21 472.9 2.1 22.9X
Dataset 5864 6126 372 17.1 58.6 0.8X
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.4+11-LTS on Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
aggregate: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RDD sum 4821 4914 131 20.7 48.2 1.0X
DataFrame sum 71 83 8 1412.4 0.7 68.1X
Dataset sum using Aggregator 6001 6012 16 16.7 60.0 0.8X
Dataset complex Aggregator 10247 10455 294 9.8 102.5 0.5X