d7d5bdfd79
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In IPv6 scenario, the current logic to split hostname and port is not correct. ### Why are the changes needed? to support IPV6 deployment scenario ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? UT and IPV6 spark deployment with yarn Closes #28931 from PavithraRamachandran/ipv6_issue. Authored-by: Pavithraramachandran <pavi.rams@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| src | ||
| pom.xml | ||