## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The python example for tf_idf with the parameter "minDocFreq" is not properly set up because the same variable is used to transform the document for both with and without the "minDocFreq" parameter.
The IDF(minDocFreq=2) is stored in the variable "idfIgnore" but then it is the original variable "idf" used to transform the "tf" instead of the "idfIgnore".
## How was this patch tested?
Before the results for "tfidf" and "tfidfIgnore" were the same:
tfidf:
(1048576,[1046921],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046920],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046923],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892732],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892733],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892734],[3.75828890549])
tfidfIgnore:
(1048576,[1046921],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046920],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046923],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892732],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892733],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892734],[3.75828890549])
After the fix those are how they should be:
tfidf:
(1048576,[1046921],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046920],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[1046923],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892732],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892733],[3.75828890549])
(1048576,[892734],[3.75828890549])
tfidfIgnore:
(1048576,[1046921],[0.0])
(1048576,[1046920],[0.0])
(1048576,[1046923],[0.0])
(1048576,[892732],[0.0])
(1048576,[892733],[0.0])
(1048576,[892734],[0.0])
Author: Maxime Rihouey <maxime.rihouey@gmail.com>
Closes#15503 from maximerihouey/patch-1.
e3bf37fa3a