3af1651e50
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to switch the class loader strategy from `ScalaLibrary` to `Flat` (see https://www.scala-sbt.org/1.x/docs/In-Process-Classloaders.html): https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1314691686 ``` Error: java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for base name org.scalactic.ScalacticBundle, locale en Error: at java.util.ResourceBundle.throwMissingResourceException(ResourceBundle.java:1581) Error: at java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundleImpl(ResourceBundle.java:1396) Error: at java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle(ResourceBundle.java:782) Error: at org.scalactic.Resources$.resourceBundle$lzycompute(Resources.scala:8) Error: at org.scalactic.Resources$.resourceBundle(Resources.scala:8) Error: at org.scalactic.Resources$.pleaseDefineScalacticFillFilePathnameEnvVar(Resources.scala:256) Error: at org.scalactic.source.PositionMacro$PositionMacroImpl.apply(PositionMacro.scala:65) Error: at org.scalactic.source.PositionMacro$.genPosition(PositionMacro.scala:85) Error: at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor34.invoke(Unknown Source) Error: at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) Error: at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) ``` See also https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/5736 ### Why are the changes needed? To make the build unflaky. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? GitHub Actions build in this test. Closes #30198 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33297. Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| build.properties | ||
| MimaBuild.scala | ||
| MimaExcludes.scala | ||
| plugins.sbt | ||
| SparkBuild.scala | ||