https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12249
Currently `!=` operator is not pushed down correctly.
I simply added a case for this.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#10233 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-12249.
Spark on Yarn handle AM being told command from RM
When RM throws ApplicationAttemptNotFoundException for allocate
invocation, making the ApplicationMaster to finish immediately without any
retries.
Author: Devaraj K <devaraj@apache.org>
Closes#10129 from devaraj-kavali/SPARK-4117.
This change builds the event history of completed apps asynchronously so the RPC thread will not be blocked and allow new workers to register/remove if the event log history is very large and takes a long time to rebuild.
Author: Bryan Cutler <bjcutler@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10284 from BryanCutler/async-MasterUI-SPARK-12062.
These changes rework the implementations of `SimpleFutureAction`, `ComplexFutureAction`, `JobWaiter`, and `AsyncRDDActions` such that asynchronous callbacks on the generated `Futures` NEVER block waiting for a job to complete. A small amount of mutex synchronization is necessary to protect the internal fields that manage cancellation, but these locks are only held very briefly and in practice should almost never cause any blocking to occur. The existing blocking APIs of these classes are retained, but they simply delegate to the underlying non-blocking API and `Await` the results with indefinite timeouts.
Associated JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9026
Also fixes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4514
This pull request contains all my own original work, which I release to the Spark project under its open source license.
Author: Richard W. Eggert II <richard.eggert@gmail.com>
Closes#9264 from reggert/fix-futureaction.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9516
- [x] new look of Thread Dump Page
- [x] click column title to sort
- [x] grep
- [x] search as you type
squito JoshRosen It's ready for the review now
Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>
Closes#7910 from CodingCat/SPARK-9516.
Adding more documentation about submitting jobs with mesos cluster mode.
Author: Timothy Chen <tnachen@gmail.com>
Closes#10086 from tnachen/mesos_supervise_docs.
Replace shuffleManagerClassName with shortShuffleMgrName is to reduce time of string's comparison. and put sort's comparison on the front. cc JoshRosen andrewor14
Author: Lianhui Wang <lianhuiwang09@gmail.com>
Closes#10131 from lianhuiwang/spark-12130.
This is continuation of SPARK-12056 where change is applied to SqlNewHadoopRDD.scala
andrewor14
FYI
Author: tedyu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Closes#10164 from tedyu/master.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12236
Currently JDBC filters are not tested properly. All the tests pass even if the filters are not pushed down due to Spark-side filtering.
In this PR,
Firstly, I corrected the tests to properly check the pushed down filters by removing Spark-side filtering.
Also, `!=` was being tested which is actually not pushed down. So I removed them.
Lastly, I moved the `stripSparkFilter()` function to `SQLTestUtils` as this functions would be shared for all tests for pushed down filters. This function would be also shared with ORC datasource as the filters for that are also not being tested properly.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#10221 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-12236.
Rename ```weights``` to ```coefficients``` for examples/DeveloperApiExample.
cc mengxr jkbradley
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#10280 from yanboliang/spark-coefficients.
Fix a minor typo (unbalanced bracket) in ResetSystemProperties.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10303 from holdenk/SPARK-12332-trivial-typo-in-ResetSystemProperties-comment.
Support UnsafeRow for the Coalesce/Except/Intersect.
Could you review if my code changes are ok? davies Thank you!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10285 from gatorsmile/unsafeSupportCIE.
marmbrus This PR is to address your comment. Thanks for your review!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10214 from gatorsmile/followup12188.
I think it was a mistake, and we have not catched it so far until https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10260 which begin to check if the `fromRowExpression` is resolved.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10263 from cloud-fan/encoder.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12016
We should not directly use Word2VecModel in pyspark. We need to wrap it in a Word2VecModelWrapper when loading it in pyspark.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Closes#10100 from viirya/fix-load-py-wordvecmodel.
When SparkStrategies.BasicOperators's "case BroadcastHint(child) => apply(child)" is hit, it only recursively invokes BasicOperators.apply with this "child". It makes many strategies have no change to process this plan, which probably leads to "No plan" issue, so we use planLater to go through all strategies.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12275
Author: yucai <yucai.yu@intel.com>
Closes#10265 from yucai/broadcast_hint.
Currently, we could generate different plans for query with single distinct (depends on spark.sql.specializeSingleDistinctAggPlanning), one works better on low cardinality columns, the other
works better for high cardinality column (default one).
This PR change to generate a single plan (three aggregations and two exchanges), which work better in both cases, then we could safely remove the flag `spark.sql.specializeSingleDistinctAggPlanning` (introduced in 1.6).
For a query like `SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT a) FROM table` will be
```
AGG-4 (count distinct)
Shuffle to a single reducer
Partial-AGG-3 (count distinct, no grouping)
Partial-AGG-2 (grouping on a)
Shuffle by a
Partial-AGG-1 (grouping on a)
```
This PR also includes large refactor for aggregation (reduce 500+ lines of code)
cc yhuai nongli marmbrus
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10228 from davies/single_distinct.
1. Make sure workers and masters exit so that no worker or master will still be running when triggering the shutdown hook.
2. Set ExecutorState to FAILED if it's still RUNNING when executing the shutdown hook.
This should fix the potential exceptions when exiting a local cluster
```
java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed: executor 4 state transfer from RUNNING to RUNNING is illegal
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master$$anonfun$receive$1.applyOrElse(Master.scala:260)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox$$anonfun$process$1.apply$mcV$sp(Inbox.scala:116)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.safelyCall(Inbox.scala:204)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.process(Inbox.scala:100)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Shutdown hooks cannot be modified during shutdown.
at org.apache.spark.util.SparkShutdownHookManager.add(ShutdownHookManager.scala:246)
at org.apache.spark.util.ShutdownHookManager$.addShutdownHook(ShutdownHookManager.scala:191)
at org.apache.spark.util.ShutdownHookManager$.addShutdownHook(ShutdownHookManager.scala:180)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.ExecutorRunner.start(ExecutorRunner.scala:73)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker$$anonfun$receive$1.applyOrElse(Worker.scala:474)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox$$anonfun$process$1.apply$mcV$sp(Inbox.scala:116)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.safelyCall(Inbox.scala:204)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.process(Inbox.scala:100)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
```
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#10269 from zsxwing/executor-state.
The existing sample functions miss the parameter `seed`, however, the corresponding function interface in `generics` has such a parameter. Thus, although the function caller can call the function with the 'seed', we are not using the value.
This could cause SparkR unit tests failed. For example, I hit it in another PR:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47213/consoleFull
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10160 from gatorsmile/sampleR.
Modifies the String overload to call the Column overload and ensures this is called in a test.
Author: Ankur Dave <ankurdave@gmail.com>
Closes#10271 from ankurdave/SPARK-12298.
Since ```Dataset``` has a new meaning in Spark 1.6, we should rename it to avoid confusion.
#9873 finished the work of Scala example, here we focus on the Python one.
Move dataset_example.py to ```examples/ml``` and rename to ```dataframe_example.py```.
BTW, fix minor missing issues of #9873.
cc mengxr
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#9957 from yanboliang/SPARK-11978.
Added a paragraph regarding StringIndexer#setHandleInvalid to the ml-features documentation.
I wonder if I should also add a snippet to the code example, input welcome.
Author: BenFradet <benjamin.fradet@gmail.com>
Closes#10257 from BenFradet/SPARK-12217.
As noted in PR #9441, implementing `tallSkinnyQR` uncovered a bug with our PySpark `RowMatrix` constructor. As discussed on the dev list [here](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/K-Means-And-Class-Tags-td10038.html), there appears to be an issue with type erasure with RDDs coming from Java, and by extension from PySpark. Although we are attempting to construct a `RowMatrix` from an `RDD[Vector]` in [PythonMLlibAPI](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala#L1115), the `Vector` type is erased, resulting in an `RDD[Object]`. Thus, when calling Scala's `tallSkinnyQR` from PySpark, we get a Java `ClassCastException` in which an `Object` cannot be cast to a Spark `Vector`. As noted in the aforementioned dev list thread, this issue was also encountered with `DecisionTrees`, and the fix involved an explicit `retag` of the RDD with a `Vector` type. `IndexedRowMatrix` and `CoordinateMatrix` do not appear to have this issue likely due to their related helper functions in `PythonMLlibAPI` creating the RDDs explicitly from DataFrames with pattern matching, thus preserving the types.
This PR currently contains that retagging fix applied to the `createRowMatrix` helper function in `PythonMLlibAPI`. This PR blocks #9441, so once this is merged, the other can be rebased.
cc holdenk
Author: Mike Dusenberry <mwdusenb@us.ibm.com>
Closes#9458 from dusenberrymw/SPARK-11497_PySpark_RowMatrix_Constructor_Has_Type_Erasure_Issue.
Adding in Pipeline Import and Export Documentation.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <wchambers@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Closes#10179 from anabranch/master.
* ```jsonFile``` should support multiple input files, such as:
```R
jsonFile(sqlContext, c(“path1”, “path2”)) # character vector as arguments
jsonFile(sqlContext, “path1,path2”)
```
* Meanwhile, ```jsonFile``` has been deprecated by Spark SQL and will be removed at Spark 2.0. So we mark ```jsonFile``` deprecated and use ```read.json``` at SparkR side.
* Replace all ```jsonFile``` with ```read.json``` at test_sparkSQL.R, but still keep jsonFile test case.
* If this PR is accepted, we should also make almost the same change for ```parquetFile```.
cc felixcheung sun-rui shivaram
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#10145 from yanboliang/spark-12146.
LogisticRegression training summary should still function if the predictionCol is set to an empty string or otherwise unset (related too https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9718 )
Author: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#9037 from holdenk/SPARK-10991-LogisticRegressionTrainingSummary-handle-empty-prediction-col.
With the merge of [SPARK-8337](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8337), now the Python API has the same functionalities compared to Scala/Java, so here changing the description to make it more precise.
zsxwing tdas , please review, thanks a lot.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#10246 from jerryshao/direct-kafka-doc-update.
**Problem.** In unified memory management, acquiring execution memory may lead to eviction of storage memory. However, the space freed from evicting cached blocks is distributed among all active tasks. Thus, an incorrect upper bound on the execution memory per task can cause the acquisition to fail, leading to OOM's and premature spills.
**Example.** Suppose total memory is 1000B, cached blocks occupy 900B, `spark.memory.storageFraction` is 0.4, and there are two active tasks. In this case, the cap on task execution memory is 100B / 2 = 50B. If task A tries to acquire 200B, it will evict 100B of storage but can only acquire 50B because of the incorrect cap. For another example, see this [regression test](https://github.com/andrewor14/spark/blob/fix-oom/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/UnifiedMemoryManagerSuite.scala#L233) that I stole from JoshRosen.
**Solution.** Fix the cap on task execution memory. It should take into account the space that could have been freed by storage in addition to the current amount of memory available to execution. In the example above, the correct cap should have been 600B / 2 = 300B.
This patch also guards against the race condition (SPARK-12253):
(1) Existing tasks collectively occupy all execution memory
(2) New task comes in and blocks while existing tasks spill
(3) After tasks finish spilling, another task jumps in and puts in a large block, stealing the freed memory
(4) New task still cannot acquire memory and goes back to sleep
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#10240 from andrewor14/fix-oom.
This patch adds documentation for Spark configurations that affect off-heap memory and makes some naming and validation improvements for those configs.
- Change `spark.memory.offHeapSize` to `spark.memory.offHeap.size`. This is fine because this configuration has not shipped in any Spark release yet (it's new in Spark 1.6).
- Deprecated `spark.unsafe.offHeap` in favor of a new `spark.memory.offHeap.enabled` configuration. The motivation behind this change is to gather all memory-related configurations under the same prefix.
- Add a check which prevents users from setting `spark.memory.offHeap.enabled=true` when `spark.memory.offHeap.size == 0`. After SPARK-11389 (#9344), which was committed in Spark 1.6, Spark enforces a hard limit on the amount of off-heap memory that it will allocate to tasks. As a result, enabling off-heap execution memory without setting `spark.memory.offHeap.size` will lead to immediate OOMs. The new configuration validation makes this scenario easier to diagnose, helping to avoid user confusion.
- Document these configurations on the configuration page.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#10237 from JoshRosen/SPARK-12251.