## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes SparkContext broken state in which it may fall if spark driver get crashed or killed by OOM.
## How was this patch tested?
1. Start SparkContext;
2. Find Spark driver process and `kill -9` it;
3. Call `sc.stop()`;
4. Create new SparkContext after that;
Without this patch you will crash on step 3 and won't be able to do step 4 without manual reset private attibutes or IPython notebook / shell restart.
Author: Alexander Shorin <kxepal@apache.org>
Closes#15961 from kxepal/18523-make-spark-context-stop-more-reliable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove deprecated methods for ML.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15913 from yanboliang/spark-18481.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds two of the newly added methods of `Dataset`s to Python:
`withWatermark` and `checkpoint`
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#15921 from brkyvz/py-watermark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose RDD's localCheckpoint() and associated functions in PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a UnitTest in python/pyspark/tests.py which passes.
I certify that this is my original work, and I license it to the project under the project's open source license.
Gabriel HUANG
Developer at Cardabel (http://cardabel.com/)
Author: Gabriel Huang <gabi.xiaohuang@gmail.com>
Closes#15811 from gabrielhuang/pyspark-localcheckpoint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add model summary APIs for `GaussianMixtureModel` and `BisectingKMeansModel` in pyspark.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: sethah <seth.hendrickson16@gmail.com>
Closes#15777 from sethah/pyspark_cluster_summaries.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I found the documentation for the sample method to be confusing, this adds more clarification across all languages.
- [x] Scala
- [x] Python
- [x] R
- [x] RDD Scala
- [ ] RDD Python with SEED
- [X] RDD Java
- [x] RDD Java with SEED
- [x] RDD Python
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Closes#15815 from anabranch/SPARK-18365.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to provide a pip installable PySpark package. This does a bunch of work to copy the jars over and package them with the Python code (to prevent challenges from trying to use different versions of the Python code with different versions of the JAR). It does not currently publish to PyPI but that is the natural follow up (SPARK-18129).
Done:
- pip installable on conda [manual tested]
- setup.py installed on a non-pip managed system (RHEL) with YARN [manual tested]
- Automated testing of this (virtualenv)
- packaging and signing with release-build*
Possible follow up work:
- release-build update to publish to PyPI (SPARK-18128)
- figure out who owns the pyspark package name on prod PyPI (is it someone with in the project or should we ask PyPI or should we choose a different name to publish with like ApachePySpark?)
- Windows support and or testing ( SPARK-18136 )
- investigate details of wheel caching and see if we can avoid cleaning the wheel cache during our test
- consider how we want to number our dev/snapshot versions
Explicitly out of scope:
- Using pip installed PySpark to start a standalone cluster
- Using pip installed PySpark for non-Python Spark programs
*I've done some work to test release-build locally but as a non-committer I've just done local testing.
## How was this patch tested?
Automated testing with virtualenv, manual testing with conda, a system wide install, and YARN integration.
release-build changes tested locally as a non-committer (no testing of upload artifacts to Apache staging websites)
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <juliet@cloudera.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <not@myemail.com>
Closes#15659 from holdenk/SPARK-1267-pip-install-pyspark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-18459: triggerId seems like a number that should be increasing with each trigger, whether or not there is data in it. However, actually, triggerId increases only where there is a batch of data in a trigger. So its better to rename it to batchId.
SPARK-18460: triggerDetails was missing from json representation. Fixed it.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15895 from tdas/SPARK-18459.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the error message is correct but doesn't provide additional hint to new users. It would be better to hint related configuration to users in the message.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A because it only changes error message.
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15822 from viirya/minor-pyspark-worker-errmsg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we use java serialization for the WAL that stores the offsets contained in each batch. This has two main issues:
It can break across spark releases (though this is not the only thing preventing us from upgrading a running query)
It is unnecessarily opaque to the user.
I'd propose we require offsets to provide a user readable serialization and use that instead. JSON is probably a good option.
## How was this patch tested?
Tests were added for KafkaSourceOffset in [KafkaSourceOffsetSuite](external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceOffsetSuite.scala) and for LongOffset in [OffsetSuite](sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/OffsetSuite.scala)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
zsxwing marmbrus
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@gmail.com>
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@clash.local>
Closes#15626 from tcondie/spark-8360.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Gradient Boosted Tree in R.
With a few minor improvements to RandomForest in R.
Since this is relatively isolated I'd like to target this for branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests, unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15746 from felixcheung/rgbt.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor doc update that should go to master & branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15747 from felixcheung/pySPARK-14393.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Document that Java 7, Python 2.6, Scala 2.10, Hadoop < 2.6 are deprecated in Spark 2.1.0. This does not actually implement any of the change in SPARK-18138, just peppers the documentation with notices about it.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc build
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15733 from srowen/SPARK-18138.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing 'subsamplingRate' of pyspark GBTClassifier
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#15692 from zhengruifeng/gbt_subsamplingRate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Renamed kbest to numTopFeatures
- Renamed alpha to fpr
- Added missing Since annotations
- Doc cleanups
## How was this patch tested?
Added new standardized unit tests for spark.ml.
Improved existing unit test coverage a bit.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#15647 from jkbradley/chisqselector-follow-ups.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add `to_json` function in contrast with `from_json` in Scala, Java and Python.
It'd be useful if we can convert a same column from/to json. Also, some datasources do not support nested types. If we are forced to save a dataframe into those data sources, we might be able to work around by this function.
The usage is as below:
``` scala
val df = Seq(Tuple1(Tuple1(1))).toDF("a")
df.select(to_json($"a").as("json")).show()
```
``` bash
+--------+
| json|
+--------+
|{"_1":1}|
+--------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#15354 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17764.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add subsmaplingRate to randomForestClassifier
Add varianceCol to randomForestRegressor
In Python
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15638 from felixcheung/pyrandomforest.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is an enhancement of PR with commit ID:57dc326bd00cf0a49da971e9c573c48ae28acaa2.
NaN is a special type of value which is commonly seen as invalid. But We find that there are certain cases where NaN are also valuable, thus need special handling. We provided user when dealing NaN values with 3 options, to either reserve an extra bucket for NaN values, or remove the NaN values, or report an error, by setting handleNaN "keep", "skip", or "error"(default) respectively.
'''Before:
val bucketizer: Bucketizer = new Bucketizer()
.setInputCol("feature")
.setOutputCol("result")
.setSplits(splits)
'''After:
val bucketizer: Bucketizer = new Bucketizer()
.setInputCol("feature")
.setOutputCol("result")
.setSplits(splits)
.setHandleNaN("keep")
## How was this patch tested?
Tests added in QuantileDiscretizerSuite, BucketizerSuite and DataFrameStatSuite
Signed-off-by: VinceShieh <vincent.xieintel.com>
Author: VinceShieh <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Author: Vincent Xie <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#15428 from VinceShieh/spark-17219_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
API and programming guide doc changes for Scala, Python and R.
## How was this patch tested?
manual test
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15629 from felixcheung/jsondoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
StreamingQueryStatus exposed through StreamingQueryListener often needs to be recorded (similar to SparkListener events). This PR adds `.json` and `.prettyJson` to `StreamingQueryStatus`, `SourceStatus` and `SinkStatus`.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15476 from tdas/SPARK-17926.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1) Upgrade the Py4J version on the Java side
2) Update the py4j src zip file we bundle with Spark
## How was this patch tested?
Existing doctests & unit tests pass
Author: Jagadeesan <as2@us.ibm.com>
Closes#15514 from jagadeesanas2/SPARK-17960.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change is a followup for #15389 which calls `_to_java_object_rdd()` to solve this issue. Due to the concern of the possible expensive cost of the call, we can choose to decrease the batch size to solve this issue too.
Simple benchmark:
import time
num_partitions = 20000
a = sc.parallelize(range(int(1e6)), 2)
start = time.time()
l = a.repartition(num_partitions).glom().map(len).collect()
end = time.time()
print(end - start)
Before: 419.447577953
_to_java_object_rdd(): 421.916361094
decreasing the batch size: 423.712255955
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15445 from viirya/repartition-batch-size.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a crossJoin function to the DataFrame API similar to that in Scala. Joins with no condition (cartesian products) must be specified with the crossJoin API
## How was this patch tested?
Added python tests to ensure that an AnalysisException if a cartesian product is specified without crossJoin(), and that cartesian products can execute if specified via crossJoin()
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#15493 from srinathshankar/crosspython.
Currently pyspark can only call the builtin java UDF, but can not call custom java UDF. It would be better to allow that. 2 benefits:
* Leverage the power of rich third party java library
* Improve the performance. Because if we use python UDF, python daemons will be started on worker which will affect the performance.
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#9766 from zjffdu/SPARK-11775.
[SPARK-11905](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11905) added support for `persist`/`cache` for `Dataset`. However, there is no user-facing API to check if a `Dataset` is cached and if so what the storage level is. This PR adds `getStorageLevel` to `Dataset`, analogous to `RDD.getStorageLevel`.
Updated `DatasetCacheSuite`.
Author: Nick Pentreath <nickp@za.ibm.com>
Closes#13780 from MLnick/ds-storagelevel.
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For feature selection method ChiSquareSelector, it is based on the ChiSquareTestResult.statistic (ChiSqure value) to select the features. It select the features with the largest ChiSqure value. But the Degree of Freedom (df) of ChiSqure value is different in Statistics.chiSqTest(RDD), and for different df, you cannot base on ChiSqure value to select features.
So we change statistic to pValue for SelectKBest and SelectPercentile
## How was this patch tested?
change existing test
Author: Peng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Closes#15444 from mpjlu/chisqure-bug.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since ```ml.evaluation``` has supported save/load at Scala side, supporting it at Python side is very straightforward and easy.
## How was this patch tested?
Add python doctest.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#13194 from yanboliang/spark-15402.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow-up work of #13675, add Python API for ```RFormula forceIndexLabel```.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15430 from yanboliang/spark-15957-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Metrics are needed for monitoring structured streaming apps. Here is the design doc for implementing the necessary metrics.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NIdcGuR1B3WIe8t7VxLrt58TJB4DtipWEbj5I_mzJys/edit?usp=sharing
Specifically, this PR adds the following public APIs changes.
### New APIs
- `StreamingQuery.status` returns a `StreamingQueryStatus` object (renamed from `StreamingQueryInfo`, see later)
- `StreamingQueryStatus` has the following important fields
- inputRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which data is being generated by all the sources
- processingRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which the query is processing data from
all the sources
- ~~outputRate~~ - *Does not work with wholestage codegen*
- latency - Current average latency between the data being available in source and the sink writing the corresponding output
- sourceStatuses: Array[SourceStatus] - Current statuses of the sources
- sinkStatus: SinkStatus - Current status of the sink
- triggerStatus - Low-level detailed status of the last completed/currently active trigger
- latencies - getOffset, getBatch, full trigger, wal writes
- timestamps - trigger start, finish, after getOffset, after getBatch
- numRows - input, output, state total/updated rows for aggregations
- `SourceStatus` has the following important fields
- inputRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which data is being generated by the source
- processingRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which the query is processing data from the source
- triggerStatus - Low-level detailed status of the last completed/currently active trigger
- Python API for `StreamingQuery.status()`
### Breaking changes to existing APIs
**Existing direct public facing APIs**
- Deprecated direct public-facing APIs `StreamingQuery.sourceStatuses` and `StreamingQuery.sinkStatus` in favour of `StreamingQuery.status.sourceStatuses/sinkStatus`.
- Branch 2.0 should have it deprecated, master should have it removed.
**Existing advanced listener APIs**
- `StreamingQueryInfo` renamed to `StreamingQueryStatus` for consistency with `SourceStatus`, `SinkStatus`
- Earlier StreamingQueryInfo was used only in the advanced listener API, but now it is used in direct public-facing API (StreamingQuery.status)
- Field `queryInfo` in listener events `QueryStarted`, `QueryProgress`, `QueryTerminated` changed have name `queryStatus` and return type `StreamingQueryStatus`.
- Field `offsetDesc` in `SourceStatus` was Option[String], converted it to `String`.
- For `SourceStatus` and `SinkStatus` made constructor private instead of private[sql] to make them more java-safe. Instead added `private[sql] object SourceStatus/SinkStatus.apply()` which are harder to accidentally use in Java.
## How was this patch tested?
Old and new unit tests.
- Rate calculation and other internal logic of StreamMetrics tested by StreamMetricsSuite.
- New info in statuses returned through StreamingQueryListener is tested in StreamingQueryListenerSuite.
- New and old info returned through StreamingQuery.status is tested in StreamingQuerySuite.
- Source-specific tests for making sure input rows are counted are is source-specific test suites.
- Additional tests to test minor additions in LocalTableScanExec, StateStore, etc.
Metrics also manually tested using Ganglia sink
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15307 from tdas/SPARK-17731.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
update python api for NaiveBayes: add weight col parameter.
## How was this patch tested?
doctests added.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#15406 from WeichenXu123/nb_python_update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves the window function frame boundary API to make it more obvious to read and to use. The two high level changes are:
1. Create Window.currentRow, Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing to indicate the special values in frame boundaries. These methods map to the special integral values so we are not breaking backward compatibility here. This change makes the frame boundaries more self-evident (instead of Long.MinValue, it becomes Window.unboundedPreceding).
2. In Python, for any value less than or equal to JVM's Long.MinValue, treat it as Window.unboundedPreceding. For any value larger than or equal to JVM's Long.MaxValue, treat it as Window.unboundedFollowing. Before this change, if the user specifies any value that is less than Long.MinValue but not -sys.maxsize (e.g. -sys.maxsize + 1), the number we pass over to the JVM would overflow, resulting in a frame that does not make sense.
Code example required to specify a frame before this patch:
```
Window.rowsBetween(-Long.MinValue, 0)
```
While the above code should still work, the new way is more obvious to read:
```
Window.rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.currentRow)
```
## How was this patch tested?
- Updated DataFrameWindowSuite (for Scala/Java)
- Updated test_window_functions_cumulative_sum (for Python)
- Renamed DataFrameWindowSuite DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite to better reflect its purpose
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15438 from rxin/SPARK-17845.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, the invalid join type will not throw error for the following join:
```df1.join(df2, how='not-a-valid-join-type')```
The signature of the join is:
```def join(self, other, on=None, how=None):```
The existing code completely ignores the `how` parameter when `on` is `None`. This patch will process the arguments passed to join and pass in to JVM Spark SQL Analyzer, which will validate the join type passed.
## How was this patch tested?
Used manual and existing test suites.
Author: Bijay Pathak <bkpathak@mtu.edu>
Closes#15409 from bkpathak/SPARK-14761.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SQLConf is session-scoped and mutable. However, we do have the requirement for a static SQL conf, which is global and immutable, e.g. the `schemaStringThreshold` in `HiveExternalCatalog`, the flag to enable/disable hive support, the global temp view database in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897.
Actually we've already implemented static SQL conf implicitly via `SparkConf`, this PR just make it explicit and expose it to users, so that they can see the config value via SQL command or `SparkSession.conf`, and forbid users to set/unset static SQL conf.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in SQLConfSuite
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#15295 from cloud-fan/global-conf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The root cause that we would ignore SparkConf when launching JVM is that SparkConf require JVM to be created first. https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/pyspark/conf.py#L106
In this PR, I would defer the launching of JVM until SparkContext is created so that we can pass SparkConf to JVM correctly.
## How was this patch tested?
Use the example code in the description of SPARK-17387,
```
$ SPARK_HOME=$PWD PYTHONPATH=python:python/lib/py4j-0.10.3-src.zip python
Python 2.7.12 (default, Jul 1 2016, 15:12:24)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from pyspark import SparkContext
>>> from pyspark import SparkConf
>>> conf = SparkConf().set("spark.driver.memory", "4g")
>>> sc = SparkContext(conf=conf)
```
And verify the spark.driver.memory is correctly picked up.
```
...op/ -Xmx4g org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit --conf spark.driver.memory=4g pyspark-shell
```
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#14959 from zjffdu/SPARK-17387.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Quoted from JIRA description:
Calling repartition on a PySpark RDD to increase the number of partitions results in highly skewed partition sizes, with most having 0 rows. The repartition method should evenly spread out the rows across the partitions, and this behavior is correctly seen on the Scala side.
Please reference the following code for a reproducible example of this issue:
num_partitions = 20000
a = sc.parallelize(range(int(1e6)), 2) # start with 2 even partitions
l = a.repartition(num_partitions).glom().map(len).collect() # get length of each partition
min(l), max(l), sum(l)/len(l), len(l) # skewed!
In Scala's `repartition` code, we will distribute elements evenly across output partitions. However, the RDD from Python is serialized as a single binary data, so the distribution fails. We need to convert the RDD in Python to java object before repartitioning.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15389 from viirya/pyspark-rdd-repartition.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
address post hoc review comments for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#15424 from cloud-fan/global-temp-view.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgraded to a newer version of Pyrolite which supports serialization of a BinaryType StructField for PySpark.SQL
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test which fails with a raised ValueError when using the previous version of Pyrolite 4.9 and Python3
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15386 from BryanCutler/pyrolite-upgrade-SPARK-17808.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When I was creating the example code for SPARK-10496, I realized it was pretty convoluted to define the frame boundaries for window functions when there is no partition column or ordering column. The reason is that we don't provide a way to create a WindowSpec directly with the frame boundaries. We can trivially improve this by adding rowsBetween and rangeBetween to Window object.
As an example, to compute cumulative sum using the natural ordering, before this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.partitionBy(lit(1)).rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
After this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
Note that you could argue there is no point specifying a window frame without partitionBy/orderBy -- but it is strange that only rowsBetween and rangeBetween are not the only two APIs not available.
This also fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17656 (removing _root_.scala).
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to compute cumulative sum in DataFrameWindowSuite for Scala/Java and tests.py for Python.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15412 from rxin/SPARK-17844.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Global temporary view is a cross-session temporary view, which means it's shared among all sessions. Its lifetime is the lifetime of the Spark application, i.e. it will be automatically dropped when the application terminates. It's tied to a system preserved database `global_temp`(configurable via SparkConf), and we must use the qualified name to refer a global temp view, e.g. SELECT * FROM global_temp.view1.
changes for `SessionCatalog`:
1. add a new field `gloabalTempViews: GlobalTempViewManager`, to access the shared global temp views, and the global temp db name.
2. `createDatabase` will fail if users wanna create `global_temp`, which is system preserved.
3. `setCurrentDatabase` will fail if users wanna set `global_temp`, which is system preserved.
4. add `createGlobalTempView`, which is used in `CreateViewCommand` to create global temp views.
5. add `dropGlobalTempView`, which is used in `CatalogImpl` to drop global temp view.
6. add `alterTempViewDefinition`, which is used in `AlterViewAsCommand` to update the view definition for local/global temp views.
7. `renameTable`/`dropTable`/`isTemporaryTable`/`lookupRelation`/`getTempViewOrPermanentTableMetadata`/`refreshTable` will handle global temp views.
changes for SQL commands:
1. `CreateViewCommand`/`AlterViewAsCommand` is updated to support global temp views
2. `ShowTablesCommand` outputs a new column `database`, which is used to distinguish global and local temp views.
3. other commands can also handle global temp views if they call `SessionCatalog` APIs which accepts global temp views, e.g. `DropTableCommand`, `AlterTableRenameCommand`, `ShowColumnsCommand`, etc.
changes for other public API
1. add a new method `dropGlobalTempView` in `Catalog`
2. `Catalog.findTable` can find global temp view
3. add a new method `createGlobalTempView` in `Dataset`
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in `SQLViewSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#14897 from cloud-fan/global-temp-view.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If given a list of paths, `pyspark.sql.readwriter.text` will attempt to use an undefined variable `paths`. This change checks if the param `paths` is a basestring and then converts it to a list, so that the same variable `paths` can be used for both cases
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test for reading list of files
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15379 from BryanCutler/sql-readtext-paths-SPARK-17805.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1,parity check and add missing test suites for ml's NB
2,remove some unused imports
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests in spark-shell
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#15312 from zhengruifeng/nb_test_parity.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaces` ValueError` with `IndexError` when index passed to `ml` / `mllib` `SparseVector.__getitem__` is out of range. This ensures correct iteration behavior.
Replaces `ValueError` with `IndexError` for `DenseMatrix` and `SparkMatrix` in `ml` / `mllib`.
## How was this patch tested?
PySpark `ml` / `mllib` unit tests. Additional unit tests to prove that the problem has been resolved.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#15144 from zero323/SPARK-17587.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Partial revert of #15277 to instead sort and store input to model rather than require sorted input
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15299 from srowen/SPARK-17704.2.
Spark SQL has great support for reading text files that contain JSON data. However, in many cases the JSON data is just one column amongst others. This is particularly true when reading from sources such as Kafka. This PR adds a new functions `from_json` that converts a string column into a nested `StructType` with a user specified schema.
Example usage:
```scala
val df = Seq("""{"a": 1}""").toDS()
val schema = new StructType().add("a", IntegerType)
df.select(from_json($"value", schema) as 'json) // => [json: <a: int>]
```
This PR adds support for java, scala and python. I leveraged our existing JSON parsing support by moving it into catalyst (so that we could define expressions using it). I left SQL out for now, because I'm not sure how users would specify a schema.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15274 from marmbrus/jsonParser.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Python API for multinomial logistic regression.
- add `family` param in python api.
- expose `coefficientMatrix` and `interceptVector` for `LogisticRegressionModel`
- add python-side testcase for multinomial logistic regression
- update python doc.
## How was this patch tested?
existing and added doc tests.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14852 from WeichenXu123/add_MLOR_python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#14597 modified ```ChiSqSelector``` to support ```fpr``` type selector, however, it left some issue need to be addressed:
* We should allow users to set selector type explicitly rather than switching them by using different setting function, since the setting order will involves some unexpected issue. For example, if users both set ```numTopFeatures``` and ```percentile```, it will train ```kbest``` or ```percentile``` model based on the order of setting (the latter setting one will be trained). This make users confused, and we should allow users to set selector type explicitly. We handle similar issues at other place of ML code base such as ```GeneralizedLinearRegression``` and ```LogisticRegression```.
* Meanwhile, if there are more than one parameter except ```alpha``` can be set for ```fpr``` model, we can not handle it elegantly in the existing framework. And similar issues for ```kbest``` and ```percentile``` model. Setting selector type explicitly can solve this issue also.
* If setting selector type explicitly by users is allowed, we should handle param interaction such as if users set ```selectorType = percentile``` and ```alpha = 0.1```, we should notify users the parameter ```alpha``` will take no effect. We should handle complex parameter interaction checks at ```transformSchema```. (FYI #11620)
* We should use lower case of the selector type names to follow MLlib convention.
* Add ML Python API.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15214 from yanboliang/spark-17017.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Match ProbabilisticClassifer.thresholds requirements to R randomForest cutoff, requiring all > 0
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests plus new test cases
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15149 from srowen/SPARK-17057.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move the internals of the PySpark accumulator API from the old deprecated API on top of the new accumulator API.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing PySpark accumulator tests (both unit tests and doc tests at the start of accumulator.py).
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#14467 from holdenk/SPARK-16861-refactor-pyspark-accumulator-api.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add treeAggregateDepth parameter for AFTSurvivalRegression to keep consistent with LiR/LoR.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14851 from WeichenXu123/add_treeAggregate_param_for_survival_regression.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR includes the changes below:
1. Upgrade Univocity library from 2.1.1 to 2.2.1
This includes some performance improvement and also enabling auto-extending buffer in `maxCharsPerColumn` option in CSV. Please refer the [release notes](https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers/releases).
2. Remove useless `rowSeparator` variable existing in `CSVOptions`
We have this unused variable in [CSVOptions.scala#L127](29952ed096/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVOptions.scala (L127)) but it seems possibly causing confusion that it actually does not care of `\r\n`. For example, we have an issue open about this, [SPARK-17227](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17227), describing this variable.
This variable is virtually not being used because we rely on `LineRecordReader` in Hadoop which deals with only both `\n` and `\r\n`.
3. Set the default value of `maxCharsPerColumn` to auto-expending.
We are setting 1000000 for the length of each column. It'd be more sensible we allow auto-expending rather than fixed length by default.
To make sure, using `-1` is being described in the release note, [2.2.0](https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers/releases/tag/v2.2.0).
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#15138 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17583.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an issue when Bucketizer is called to handle a dataset containing NaN value.
Sometimes, null value might also be useful to users, so in these cases, Bucketizer should
reserve one extra bucket for NaN values, instead of throwing an illegal exception.
Before:
```
Bucketizer.transform on NaN value threw an illegal exception.
```
After:
```
NaN values will be grouped in an extra bucket.
```
## How was this patch tested?
New test cases added in `BucketizerSuite`.
Signed-off-by: VinceShieh <vincent.xieintel.com>
Author: VinceShieh <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Closes#14858 from VinceShieh/spark-17219.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Univariate feature selection works by selecting the best features based on univariate statistical tests. False Positive Rate (FPR) is a popular univariate statistical test for feature selection. We add a chiSquare Selector based on False Positive Rate (FPR) test in this PR, like it is implemented in scikit-learn.
http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/feature_selection.html#univariate-feature-selection
## How was this patch tested?
Add Scala ut
Author: Peng, Meng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Closes#14597 from mpjlu/fprChiSquare.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Users would like to add a directory as dependency in some cases, they can use ```SparkContext.addFile``` with argument ```recursive=true``` to recursively add all files under the directory by using Scala. But Python users can only add file not directory, we should also make it supported.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15140 from yanboliang/spark-17585.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Scala version of `SparkContext` has a handy field called `uiWebUrl` that tells you which URL the SparkUI spawned by that instance lives at. This is often very useful because the value for `spark.ui.port` in the config is only a suggestion; if that port number is taken by another Spark instance on the same machine, Spark will just keep incrementing the port until it finds a free one. So, on a machine with a lot of running PySpark instances, you often have to start trying all of them one-by-one until you find your application name.
Scala users have a way around this with `uiWebUrl` but Java and Python users do not. This pull request fixes this in the most straightforward way possible, simply propagating this field through the `JavaSparkContext` and into pyspark through the Java gateway.
Please let me know if any additional documentation/testing is needed.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests were run to make sure there were no regressions, and a binary distribution was created and tested manually for the correct value of `sc.uiWebPort` in a variety of circumstances.
Author: Adrian Petrescu <apetresc@gmail.com>
Closes#15000 from apetresc/pyspark-uiweburl.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In optimizer, we try to evaluate the condition to see whether it's nullable or not, but some expressions are not evaluable, we should check that before evaluate it.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#15103 from davies/udf_join.
## Problem
CSV in Spark 2.0.0:
- does not read null values back correctly for certain data types such as `Boolean`, `TimestampType`, `DateType` -- this is a regression comparing to 1.6;
- does not read empty values (specified by `options.nullValue`) as `null`s for `StringType` -- this is compatible with 1.6 but leads to problems like SPARK-16903.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch makes changes to read all empty values back as `null`s.
## How was this patch tested?
New test cases.
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#14118 from lw-lin/csv-cast-null.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request changes the behavior of `Word2VecModel.findSynonyms` so that it will not spuriously reject the best match when invoked with a vector that does not correspond to a word in the model's vocabulary. Instead of blindly discarding the best match, the changed implementation discards a match that corresponds to the query word (in cases where `findSynonyms` is invoked with a word) or that has an identical angle to the query vector.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a test to `Word2VecSuite` to ensure that the word with the most similar vector from a supplied vector would not be spuriously rejected.
Author: William Benton <willb@redhat.com>
Closes#15105 from willb/fix/findSynonyms.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For large objects, pickle does not raise useful error messages. However, we can wrap them to be slightly more user friendly:
Example 1:
```
def run():
import numpy.random as nr
b = nr.bytes(8 * 1000000000)
sc.parallelize(range(1000), 1000).map(lambda x: len(b)).count()
run()
```
Before:
```
error: 'i' format requires -2147483648 <= number <= 2147483647
```
After:
```
pickle.PicklingError: Object too large to serialize: 'i' format requires -2147483648 <= number <= 2147483647
```
Example 2:
```
def run():
import numpy.random as nr
b = sc.broadcast(nr.bytes(8 * 1000000000))
sc.parallelize(range(1000), 1000).map(lambda x: len(b.value)).count()
run()
```
Before:
```
SystemError: error return without exception set
```
After:
```
cPickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize broadcast: SystemError: error return without exception set
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tried out these cases
cc davies
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#15026 from ericl/spark-17472.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, `df.take(1)` runs a single-stage job which computes only one partition of the DataFrame, while `df.limit(1).collect()` computes all partitions and runs a two-stage job. This difference in performance is confusing.
The reason why `limit(1).collect()` is so much slower is that `collect()` internally maps to `df.rdd.<some-pyspark-conversions>.toLocalIterator`, which causes Spark SQL to build a query where a global limit appears in the middle of the plan; this, in turn, ends up being executed inefficiently because limits in the middle of plans are now implemented by repartitioning to a single task rather than by running a `take()` job on the driver (this was done in #7334, a patch which was a prerequisite to allowing partition-local limits to be pushed beneath unions, etc.).
In order to fix this performance problem I think that we should generalize the fix from SPARK-10731 / #8876 so that `DataFrame.collect()` also delegates to the Scala implementation and shares the same performance properties. This patch modifies `DataFrame.collect()` to first collect all results to the driver and then pass them to Python, allowing this query to be planned using Spark's `CollectLimit` optimizations.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a regression test in `sql/tests.py` which asserts that the expected number of jobs, stages, and tasks are run for both queries.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#15068 from JoshRosen/pyspark-collect-limit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request removes the SparkContext.clearFiles() method from the PySpark API as the method was removed from the Scala API in 8ce645d4ee. Using that method in PySpark leads to an exception as PySpark tries to call the non-existent method on the JVM side.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests (though none of them tested this particular method).
Author: Sami Jaktholm <sjakthol@outlook.com>
Closes#15081 from sjakthol/pyspark-sc-clearfiles.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there is any Python UDF in the Project between Sort and Limit, it will be collected into TakeOrderedAndProjectExec, ExtractPythonUDFs failed to pull the Python UDFs out because QueryPlan.expressions does not include the expression inside Option[Seq[Expression]].
Ideally, we should fix the `QueryPlan.expressions`, but tried with no luck (it always run into infinite loop). In PR, I changed the TakeOrderedAndProjectExec to no use Option[Seq[Expression]] to workaround it. cc JoshRosen
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression test.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#15030 from davies/all_expr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#14956 reduced default k-means|| init steps to 2 from 5 only for spark.mllib package, we should also do same change for spark.ml and PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15050 from yanboliang/spark-17389.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```weights``` of ```MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel``` should be the output weights of layers rather than initial weights, this PR correct it.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc change.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#14967 from yanboliang/mlp-weights.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Related to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524 -- just the 'fix' rather than a behavior change.
- PythonMLlibAPI methods that take a seed now always take a `java.lang.Long` consistently, allowing the Python API to specify "no seed"
- .mllib's Word2VecModel seemed to be an odd man out in .mllib in that it picked its own random seed. Instead it defaults to None, meaning, letting the Scala implementation pick a seed
- BisectingKMeansModel arguably should not hard-code a seed for consistency with .mllib, I think. However I left it.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14826 from srowen/SPARK-16832.2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Require the use of CROSS join syntax in SQL (and a new crossJoin
DataFrame API) to specify explicit cartesian products between relations.
By cartesian product we mean a join between relations R and S where
there is no join condition involving columns from both R and S.
If a cartesian product is detected in the absence of an explicit CROSS
join, an error must be thrown. Turning on the
"spark.sql.crossJoin.enabled" configuration flag will disable this check
and allow cartesian products without an explicit CROSS join.
The new crossJoin DataFrame API must be used to specify explicit cross
joins. The existing join(DataFrame) method will produce a INNER join
that will require a subsequent join condition.
That is df1.join(df2) is equivalent to select * from df1, df2.
## How was this patch tested?
Added cross-join.sql to the SQLQueryTestSuite to test the check for cartesian products. Added a couple of tests to the DataFrameJoinSuite to test the crossJoin API. Modified various other test suites to explicitly specify a cross join where an INNER join or a comma-separated list was previously used.
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#14866 from srinathshankar/crossjoin.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set SparkSession._instantiatedContext as None so that we can recreate SparkSession again.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested manually using the following command in pyspark shell
```
spark.stop()
spark = SparkSession.builder.enableHiveSupport().getOrCreate()
spark.sql("show databases").show()
```
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#14857 from zjffdu/SPARK-17261.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clarify that only parquet files are supported by DataStreamWriter now
## How was this patch tested?
(Doc build -- no functional changes to test)
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14860 from srowen/SPARK-17264.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow centering / mean scaling of sparse vectors in StandardScaler, if requested. This is for compatibility with `VectorAssembler` in common usages.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests, including new caes to reflect the new behavior.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14663 from srowen/SPARK-17001.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Method `SQLContext.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` could be removed, we should use `SparkSession.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` instead.
This require updating PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Author: jiangxingbo <jiangxb1987@gmail.com>
Closes#14790 from jiangxb1987/parseDataType.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
### Default - ISO 8601
Currently, CSV datasource is writing `Timestamp` and `Date` as numeric form and JSON datasource is writing both as below:
- CSV
```
// TimestampType
1414459800000000
// DateType
16673
```
- Json
```
// TimestampType
1970-01-01 11:46:40.0
// DateType
1970-01-01
```
So, for CSV we can't read back what we write and for JSON it becomes ambiguous because the timezone is being missed.
So, this PR make both **write** `Timestamp` and `Date` in ISO 8601 formatted string (please refer the [ISO 8601 specification](https://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime)).
- For `Timestamp` it becomes as below: (`yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ`)
```
1970-01-01T02:00:01.000-01:00
```
- For `Date` it becomes as below (`yyyy-MM-dd`)
```
1970-01-01
```
### Custom date format option - `dateFormat`
This PR also adds the support to write and read dates and timestamps in a formatted string as below:
- **DateType**
- With `dateFormat` option (e.g. `yyyy/MM/dd`)
```
+----------+
| date|
+----------+
|2015/08/26|
|2014/10/27|
|2016/01/28|
+----------+
```
### Custom date format option - `timestampFormat`
- **TimestampType**
- With `dateFormat` option (e.g. `dd/MM/yyyy HH:mm`)
```
+----------------+
| date|
+----------------+
|2015/08/26 18:00|
|2014/10/27 18:30|
|2016/01/28 20:00|
+----------------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were added in `CSVSuite` and `JsonSuite`. For JSON, existing tests cover the default cases.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#14279 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-16216-json-csv.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update to py4j 0.10.3 to enable JAVA_HOME support
## How was this patch tested?
Pyspark tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14748 from srowen/SPARK-16781.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing `numFeatures` and `numClasses` to the wrapped Java models in PySpark ML pipelines. Also tag `DecisionTreeClassificationModel` as Expiremental to match Scala doc.
## How was this patch tested?
Extended doctests
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#12889 from holdenk/SPARK-15113-add-missing-numFeatures-numClasses.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When fitting a PySpark Pipeline without the `stages` param set, a confusing NoneType error is raised as attempts to iterate over the pipeline stages. A pipeline with no stages should act as an identity transform, however the `stages` param still needs to be set to an empty list. This change improves the error output when the `stages` param is not set and adds a better description of what the API expects as input. Also minor cleanup of related code.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests to verify an empty Pipeline acts as an identity transformer
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#12790 from BryanCutler/pipeline-identity-SPARK-15018.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. In scala, add negative low bound checking and put all the low/upper bound checking in one place
2. In python, add low/upper bound checking of indices.
## How was this patch tested?
unit test added
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#14555 from zjffdu/SPARK-16965.
JIRA issue link:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16961
Changed one line of Utils.randomizeInPlace to allow elements to stay in place.
Created a unit test that runs a Pearson's chi squared test to determine whether the output diverges significantly from a uniform distribution.
Author: Nick Lavers <nick.lavers@videoamp.com>
Closes#14551 from nicklavers/SPARK-16961-randomizeInPlace.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This should be credited to mvervuurt. The main purpose of this PR is
- simply to include the change for the same instance in `DataFrameReader` just to match up.
- just avoid duplicately verifying the PR (as I already did).
The documentation for both should be the same because both assume the `properties` should be the same `dict` for the same option.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually building Python documentation.
This will produce the output as below:
- `DataFrameReader`
- `DataFrameWriter`
Closes#14624
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: mvervuurt <m.a.vervuurt@gmail.com>
Closes#14677 from HyukjinKwon/typo-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`PySpark` loses `microsecond` precision for some corner cases during converting `Timestamp` into `Long`. For example, for the following `datetime.max` value should be converted a value whose last 6 digits are '999999'. This PR improves the logic not to lose precision for all cases.
**Corner case**
```python
>>> datetime.datetime.max
datetime.datetime(9999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999999)
```
**Before**
```python
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> from pyspark.sql import Row
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, TimestampType
>>> schema = StructType([StructField("dt", TimestampType(), False)])
>>> [schema.toInternal(row) for row in [{"dt": datetime.max}]]
[(253402329600000000,)]
```
**After**
```python
>>> [schema.toInternal(row) for row in [{"dt": datetime.max}]]
[(253402329599999999,)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins test with a new test case.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14631 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-17035.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In 2.0, we verify the data type against schema for every row for safety, but with performance cost, this PR make it optional.
When we verify the data type for StructType, it does not support all the types we support in infer schema (for example, dict), this PR fix that to make them consistent.
For Row object which is created using named arguments, the order of fields are sorted by name, they may be not different than the order in provided schema, this PR fix that by ignore the order of fields in this case.
## How was this patch tested?
Created regression tests for them.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#14469 from davies/py_dict.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the typo of ```TreeEnsembleModels``` for PySpark, it should ```TreeEnsembleModel``` which will be consistent with Scala. What's more, it represents a tree ensemble model, so ```TreeEnsembleModel``` should be more reasonable. This should not be used public, so it will not involve breaking change.
## How was this patch tested?
No new tests, should pass existing ones.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#14454 from yanboliang/TreeEnsembleModel.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Doc that regexp_extract returns empty string when regex or group does not match
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test, with a few new test cases
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14525 from srowen/SPARK-16324.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Ability to use KafkaUtils.createDirectStream with starting offsets in python 3 by using java.lang.Number instead of Long during param mapping in scala helper. This allows py4j to pass Integer or Long to the map and resolves ClassCastException problems.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
jerryshao - could you please look at this PR?
Author: Mariusz Strzelecki <mariusz.strzelecki@allegrogroup.com>
Closes#14540 from szczeles/kafka_pyspark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
regexp_extract actually returns null when it shouldn't when a regex matches but the requested optional group did not. This makes it return an empty string, as apparently designed.
## How was this patch tested?
Additional unit test
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14504 from srowen/SPARK-16409.
## Proposed Changes
* Update the list of "important classes" in `pyspark.sql` to match 2.0.
* Fix references to `UDFRegistration` so that the class shows up in the docs. It currently [doesn't](http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/api/python/pyspark.sql.html).
* Remove some unnecessary whitespace in the Python RST doc files.
I reused the [existing JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16772) I created last week for similar API doc fixes.
## How was this patch tested?
* I ran `lint-python` successfully.
* I ran `make clean build` on the Python docs and confirmed the results are as expected locally in my browser.
Author: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@gmail.com>
Closes#14496 from nchammas/SPARK-16772-UDFRegistration.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
avgMetrics was summed, not averaged, across folds
Author: =^_^= <maxmoroz@gmail.com>
Closes#14456 from pkch/pkch-patch-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two related bugs of Python-only UDTs. Because the test case of second one needs the first fix too. I put them into one PR. If it is not appropriate, please let me know.
### First bug: When MapObjects works on Python-only UDTs
`RowEncoder` will use `PythonUserDefinedType.sqlType` for its deserializer expression. If the sql type is `ArrayType`, we will have `MapObjects` working on it. But `MapObjects` doesn't consider `PythonUserDefinedType` as its input data type. It causes error like:
import pyspark.sql.group
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql.types import *
schema = StructType().add("key", LongType()).add("val", PythonOnlyUDT())
df = spark.createDataFrame([(i % 3, PythonOnlyPoint(float(i), float(i))) for i in range(10)], schema=schema)
df.show()
File "/home/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o36.showString.
: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error while decoding: scala.MatchError: org.apache.spark.sql.types.PythonUserDefinedTypef4ceede8 (of class org.apache.spark.sql.types.PythonUserDefinedType)
...
### Second bug: When Python-only UDTs is the element type of ArrayType
import pyspark.sql.group
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql.types import *
schema = StructType().add("key", LongType()).add("val", ArrayType(PythonOnlyUDT()))
df = spark.createDataFrame([(i % 3, [PythonOnlyPoint(float(i), float(i))]) for i in range(10)], schema=schema)
df.show()
## How was this patch tested?
PySpark's sql tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13778 from viirya/fix-pyudt.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects [an error made in an earlier PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14393/files#r72843069).
## How was this patch tested?
```sh
$ ./dev/lint-python
PEP8 checks passed.
rm -rf _build/*
pydoc checks passed.
```
I also built the docs and confirmed that they looked good in my browser.
Author: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@gmail.com>
Closes#14408 from nchammas/SPARK-16772.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated ML pipeline Cross Validation Scaladoc & PyDoc.
## How was this patch tested?
Documentation update
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Author: krishnakalyan3 <krishnakalyan3@gmail.com>
Closes#13894 from krishnakalyan3/kfold-cv.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
replace ANN convergence tolerance param default
from 1e-4 to 1e-6
so that it will be the same with other algorithms in MLLib which use LBFGS as optimizer.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing Test.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14286 from WeichenXu123/update_ann_tol.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add `SparseMatrix` class whick support pickler.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14265 from WeichenXu123/picklable_py.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
move the `HiveContext` deprecate warning printing statement into `HiveContext` constructor.
so that this warning will appear only when we use `HiveContext`
otherwise this warning will always appear if we reference the pyspark.ml.context code file.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14301 from WeichenXu123/hiveContext_python_warning_update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`withColumnRenamed` and `drop` is a no-op if the given column name does not exists. Python documentation also describe that, but this PR adds more explicit line consistently with Scala to reduce the ambiguity.
## How was this patch tested?
It's about docs.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14288 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16651.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
breeze 0.12 has been released for more than half a year, and it brings lots of new features, performance improvement and bug fixes.
One of the biggest features is ```LBFGS-B``` which is an implementation of ```LBFGS``` with box constraints and much faster for some special case.
We would like to implement Huber loss function for ```LinearRegression``` ([SPARK-3181](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3181)) and it requires ```LBFGS-B``` as the optimization solver. So we should bump up the dependent breeze version to 0.12.
For more features, improvements and bug fixes of breeze 0.12, you can refer the following link:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-breeze/nEeRi_DcY5c
## How was this patch tested?
No new tests, should pass the existing ones.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#14150 from yanboliang/spark-16494.
