## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes `pivot(Column)` can accepts `collection.mutable.WrappedArray`.
Note that we return `collection.mutable.WrappedArray` from `ArrayType`, and `Literal.apply` doesn't support this.
We can unwrap the array and use it for type dispatch.
```scala
val df = Seq(
(2, Seq.empty[String]),
(2, Seq("a", "x")),
(3, Seq.empty[String]),
(3, Seq("a", "x"))).toDF("x", "s")
df.groupBy("x").pivot("s").count().show()
```
Before:
```
Unsupported literal type class scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray$ofRef WrappedArray()
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unsupported literal type class scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray$ofRef WrappedArray()
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Literal$.apply(literals.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.$anonfun$pivot$2(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:427)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:36)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach$(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:33)
at scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray.foreach(WrappedArray.scala:39)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.pivot(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:425)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.pivot(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:406)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.pivot(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:317)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFramePivotSuite.$anonfun$new$1(DataFramePivotSuite.scala:341)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
```
After:
```
+---+---+------+
| x| []|[a, x]|
+---+---+------+
| 3| 1| 1|
| 2| 1| 1|
+---+---+------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and unittests were added.
Closes#23349 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26403.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DataSourceScanExec` overrides "wrong" `treeString` method without `append`. In the PR, I propose to make `treeString`s **final** to prevent such mistakes in the future. And removed the `treeString` and `verboseString` since they both use `simpleString` with reduction.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `DataSourceScanExecRedactionSuite`
Closes#23431 from MaxGekk/datasource-scan-exec-followup.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses warning messages in Java files reported at [lgtm.com](https://lgtm.com).
[lgtm.com](https://lgtm.com) provides automated code review of Java/Python/JavaScript files for OSS projects. [Here](https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/spark/alerts/?mode=list&severity=warning) are warning messages regarding Apache Spark project.
This PR addresses the following warnings:
- Result of multiplication cast to wider type
- Implicit narrowing conversion in compound assignment
- Boxed variable is never null
- Useless null check
NOTE: `Potential input resource leak` looks false positive for now.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Closes#23420 from kiszk/SPARK-26508.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Default timestamp pattern defined in `JSONOptions` doesn't allow saving/loading timestamps with time zones of seconds precision. Because of that, the round trip test failed for timestamps before 1582. In the PR, I propose to extend zone offset section from `XXX` to `XXXXX` which should allow to save/load zone offsets like `-07:52:48`.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `JsonHadoopFsRelationSuite` and `TimestampFormatterSuite`.
Closes#23417 from MaxGekk/hadoopfsrelationtest-new-formatter.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we operate as below:
`
0: jdbc:hive2://xxx/> create function funnel_analysis as 'com.xxx.hive.extend.udf.UapFunnelAnalysis';
`
`
0: jdbc:hive2://xxx/> select funnel_analysis(1,",",1,'');
Error: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Undefined function: 'funnel_analysis'. This function is neither a registered temporary function nor a permanent function registered in the database 'xxx'.; line 1 pos 7 (state=,code=0)
`
`
0: jdbc:hive2://xxx/> describe function funnel_analysis;
+-----------------------------------------------------------+--+
| function_desc |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+--+
| Function: xxx.funnel_analysis |
| Class: com.xxx.hive.extend.udf.UapFunnelAnalysis |
| Usage: N/A. |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+--+
`
We can see describe funtion will get right information,but when we actually use this funtion,we will get an undefined exception.
Which is really misleading,the real cause is below:
`
No handler for Hive UDF 'com.xxx.xxx.hive.extend.udf.UapFunnelAnalysis': java.lang.IllegalStateException: Should not be called directly;
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.udf.generic.GenericUDTF.initialize(GenericUDTF.java:72)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.outputInspector$lzycompute(hiveUDFs.scala:204)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.outputInspector(hiveUDFs.scala:204)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.elementSchema$lzycompute(hiveUDFs.scala:212)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.elementSchema(hiveUDFs.scala:212)
`
This patch print the actual failure for quick debugging.
## How was this patch tested?
UT
Closes#21790 from caneGuy/zhoukang/print-warning1.
Authored-by: zhoukang <zhoukang199191@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Proposed new class `StringConcat` for converting a sequence of strings to string with one memory allocation in the `toString` method. `StringConcat` replaces `StringBuilderWriter` in methods of dumping of Spark plans and codegen to strings.
All `Writer` arguments are replaced by `String => Unit` in methods related to Spark plans stringification.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing suites `QueryExecutionSuite`, `DebuggingSuite` as well as new tests for `StringConcat` in `StringUtilsSuite`.
Closes#23406 from MaxGekk/rope-plan.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the codegen bug introduced by #23358 .
- https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7-ubuntu-scala-2.11/158/
```
Line 44, Column 93: A method named "apply" is not declared in any enclosing class
nor any supertype, nor through a static import
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual. `DateExpressionsSuite` should be passed with Scala-2.11.
Closes#23394 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-26424.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the `AttributeReference.withMetadata` method have return type `Attribute`, the rest of with methods in the `AttributeReference` return type are `AttributeReference`, as the [spark-25892](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25892?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20component%20in%20(ML%2C%20PySpark%2C%20SQL)) mentioned.
This PR will change `AttributeReference.withMetadata` method's return type from `Attribute` to `AttributeReference`.
## How was this patch tested?
Run all `sql/test,` `catalyst/test` and `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.*`
Closes#22918 from kevinyu98/spark-25892.
Authored-by: Kevin Yu <qyu@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add `maxFields` parameter to all functions involved in creation of textual representation of spark plans such as `simpleString` and `verboseString`. New parameter restricts number of fields converted to truncated strings. Any elements beyond the limit will be dropped and replaced by a `"... N more fields"` placeholder. The threshold is bumped up to `Int.MaxValue` for `toFile()`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `QueryExecutionSuite` which checks `maxFields` impacts on number of truncated fields in `LocalRelation`.
Closes#23159 from MaxGekk/to-file-max-fields.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark SQL doesn't support creating partitioned table using Hive CTAS in SQL syntax. However it is supported by using DataFrameWriter API.
```scala
val df = Seq(("a", 1)).toDF("part", "id")
df.write.format("hive").partitionBy("part").saveAsTable("t")
```
Hive begins to support this syntax in newer version: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20241:
```
CREATE TABLE t PARTITIONED BY (part) AS SELECT 1 as id, "a" as part
```
This patch adds this support to SQL syntax.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#23376 from viirya/hive-ctas-partitioned-table.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch the `DateFormatClass`, `ToUnixTimestamp`, `FromUnixTime`, `UnixTime` on java.time API for parsing/formatting dates and timestamps. The API has been already implemented by the `Timestamp`/`DateFormatter` classes. One of benefit is those classes support parsing timestamps with microsecond precision. Old behaviour can be switched on via SQL config: `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` (`false` by default).
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing test suites - `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`, `JsonSuite`, `CsvSuite`, `SQLQueryTestSuite` as well as PySpark tests.
Closes#23358 from MaxGekk/new-time-cast.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix ExpresionInfo assert error in windows operation system, when running unit tests.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Closes#23363 from yanlin-Lynn/unit-test-windows.
Authored-by: wangyanlin01 <wangyanlin01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Variation of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
I cheated by not referencing fields or columns at all as this exception propagates in contexts where both would be applicable.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#23373 from srowen/SPARK-14023.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
GetStructField with different optional names should be semantically equal. We will use this as building block to compare the nested fields used in the plans to be optimized by catalyst optimizer.
This PR also fixes a bug below that accessing nested fields with different cases in case insensitive mode will result `AnalysisException`.
```
sql("create table t (s struct<i: Int>) using json")
sql("select s.I from t group by s.i")
```
which is currently failing
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: expression 'default.t.`s`' is neither present in the group by, nor is it an aggregate function
```
as cloud-fan pointed out.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests are added.
Closes#23353 from dbtsai/nestedEqual.
Lead-authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: DB Tsai <dbtsai@dbtsai.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds explanation of `why "spark.sql.shuffle.partitions" keeps unchanged in structured streaming`, which couple of users already wondered and some of them even thought it as a bug.
This patch would help other end users to know about such behavior before they find by theirselves and being wondered.
## How was this patch tested?
No need to test because this is a simple addition on guide doc with markdown editor.
Closes#22238 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-25245.
Lead-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when we infer the schema for scala/java decimals, we return as data type the `SYSTEM_DEFAULT` implementation, ie. the decimal type with precision 38 and scale 18. But this is not right, as we know nothing about the right precision and scale and these values can be not enough to store the data. This problem arises in particular with UDF, where we cast all the input of type `DecimalType` to a `DecimalType(38, 18)`: in case this is not enough, null is returned as input for the UDF.
The PR defines a custom handling for casting to the expected data types for ScalaUDF: the decimal precision and scale is picked from the input, so no casting to different and maybe wrong percision and scale happens.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Closes#23308 from mgaido91/SPARK-26308.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecate Row.merge
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23271 from KyleLi1985/master.
Authored-by: 李亮 <liang.li.work@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a small clean up.
By design catalyst rules should be orthogonal: each rule should have its own responsibility. However, the `ColumnPruning` rule does not only do column pruning, but also remove no-op project and window.
This PR updates the `RemoveRedundantProject` rule to remove no-op window as well, and clean up the `ColumnPruning` rule to only do column pruning.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23343 from cloud-fan/column-pruning.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ReplaceExceptWithFilter` we do not consider properly the case in which the condition returns NULL. Indeed, in that case, since negating NULL still returns NULL, so it is not true the assumption that negating the condition returns all the rows which didn't satisfy it, rows returning NULL may not be returned. This happens when constraints inferred by `InferFiltersFromConstraints` are not enough, as it happens with `OR` conditions.
The rule had also problems with non-deterministic conditions: in such a scenario, this rule would change the probability of the output.
The PR fixes these problem by:
- returning False for the condition when it is Null (in this way we do return all the rows which didn't satisfy it);
- avoiding any transformation when the condition is non-deterministic.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Closes#23315 from mgaido91/SPARK-26366.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `JsonInferSchema` class is extended to support `TimestampType` inferring from string fields in JSON input:
- If the `prefersDecimal` option is set to `true`, it tries to infer decimal type from the string field.
- If decimal type inference fails or `prefersDecimal` is disabled, `JsonInferSchema` tries to infer `TimestampType`.
- If timestamp type inference fails, `StringType` is returned as the inferred type.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test suite - `JsonInferSchemaSuite` to check date and timestamp types inferring from JSON using `JsonInferSchema` directly. A few tests were added `JsonSuite` to check type merging and roundtrip tests. This changes was tested by `JsonSuite`, `JsonExpressionsSuite` and `JsonFunctionsSuite` as well.
Closes#23201 from MaxGekk/json-infer-time.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements a new feature - window aggregation Pandas UDF for bounded window.
#### Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14EjeY5z4-NC27-SmIP9CsMPCANeTcvxN44a7SIJtZPc/edit#heading=h.c87w44wcj3wj
#### Example:
```
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
from pyspark.sql.window import Window
df = spark.range(0, 10, 2).toDF('v')
w1 = Window.partitionBy().orderBy('v').rangeBetween(-2, 4)
w2 = Window.partitionBy().orderBy('v').rowsBetween(-2, 2)
pandas_udf('double', PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
def avg(v):
return v.mean()
df.withColumn('v_mean', avg(df['v']).over(w1)).show()
# +---+------+
# | v|v_mean|
# +---+------+
# | 0| 1.0|
# | 2| 2.0|
# | 4| 4.0|
# | 6| 6.0|
# | 8| 7.0|
# +---+------+
df.withColumn('v_mean', avg(df['v']).over(w2)).show()
# +---+------+
# | v|v_mean|
# +---+------+
# | 0| 2.0|
# | 2| 3.0|
# | 4| 4.0|
# | 6| 5.0|
# | 8| 6.0|
# +---+------+
```
#### High level changes:
This PR modifies the existing WindowInPandasExec physical node to deal with unbounded (growing, shrinking and sliding) windows.
* `WindowInPandasExec` now share the same base class as `WindowExec` and share utility functions. See `WindowExecBase`
* `WindowFunctionFrame` now has two new functions `currentLowerBound` and `currentUpperBound` - to return the lower and upper window bound for the current output row. It is also modified to allow `AggregateProcessor` == null. Null aggregator processor is used for `WindowInPandasExec` where we don't have an aggregator and only uses lower and upper bound functions from `WindowFunctionFrame`
* The biggest change is in `WindowInPandasExec`, where it is modified to take `currentLowerBound` and `currentUpperBound` and write those values together with the input data to the python process for rolling window aggregation. See `WindowInPandasExec` for more details.
#### Discussion
In benchmarking, I found numpy variant of the rolling window UDF is much faster than the pandas version:
Spark SQL window function: 20s
Pandas variant: ~80s
Numpy variant: 10s
Numpy variant with numba: 4s
Allowing numpy variant of the vectorized UDFs is something I want to discuss because of the performance improvement, but doesn't have to be in this PR.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests
Closes#22305 from icexelloss/SPARK-24561-bounded-window-udf.
Authored-by: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. rename `FormatterUtils` to `DateTimeFormatterHelper`, and move it to a separated file
2. move `DateFormatter` and its implementation to a separated file
3. mark some methods as private
4. add `override` to some methods
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23329 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up of the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899. It is to add the rule TransposeWindow the optimizer batch.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#23222 from gatorsmile/followupSPARK-20636.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The optimizer rule `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin` performs join reordering on inner joins. This was introduced from SPARK-12032 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073) in 2015-12.
After it had reordered the joins, though, it didn't check whether or not the output attribute order is still the same as before. Thus, it's possible to have a mismatch between the reordered output attributes order vs the schema that a DataFrame thinks it has.
The same problem exists in the CBO version of join reordering (`CostBasedJoinReorder`) too.
This can be demonstrated with the example:
```scala
spark.sql("create table table_a (x int, y int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_b (i int, j int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_c (a int, b int) using parquet")
val df = spark.sql("""
with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b)
select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i
""")
```
here's what the DataFrame thinks:
```
scala> df.printSchema
root
|-- x: integer (nullable = true)
|-- y: integer (nullable = true)
|-- i: integer (nullable = true)
|-- j: integer (nullable = true)
|-- a: integer (nullable = true)
|-- b: integer (nullable = true)
```
here's what the optimized plan thinks, after join reordering:
```
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
```
If we exclude the `ReorderJoin` rule (using Spark 2.4's optimizer rule exclusion feature), it's back to normal:
```
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules", "org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin")
scala> val df = spark.sql("with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b) select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [x: int, y: int ... 4 more fields]
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
```
Note that this output attribute ordering problem leads to data corruption, and can manifest itself in various symptoms:
* Silently corrupting data, if the reordered columns happen to either have matching types or have sufficiently-compatible types (e.g. all fixed length primitive types are considered as "sufficiently compatible" in an `UnsafeRow`), then only the resulting data is going to be wrong but it might not trigger any alarms immediately. Or
* Weird Java-level exceptions like `java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException`, or even SIGSEGVs.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit test in `JoinReorderSuite` and new end-to-end test in `JoinSuite`.
Also made `JoinReorderSuite` and `StarJoinReorderSuite` assert more strongly on maintaining output attribute order.
Closes#23303 from rednaxelafx/fix-join-reorder.
Authored-by: Kris Mok <rednaxelafx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `CSVInferSchema` class is extended to support inferring of `DateType` from CSV input. The attempt to infer `DateType` is performed after inferring `TimestampType`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test for inferring date types from CSV . It was also tested by existing suites like `CSVInferSchemaSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and `CsvSuite`.
Closes#23202 from MaxGekk/csv-date-inferring.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
CSV parsing accidentally uses the previous good value for a bad input field. See example in Jira.
This PR ensures that the associated column is set to null when an input field cannot be converted.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test.
Ran all SQL unit tests (testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.*).
Ran pyspark tests for pyspark-sql
Closes#23323 from bersprockets/csv-bad-field.
Authored-by: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there is a self-join as result of a IN subquery, the join condition may be invalid, resulting in trivially true predicates and return wrong results.
The PR deduplicates the subquery output in order to avoid the issue.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#23057 from mgaido91/SPARK-26078.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch on **java.time API** for parsing timestamps and dates from JSON inputs with microseconds precision. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` allow to switch back to previous behavior with using `java.text.SimpleDateFormat`/`FastDateFormat` for parsing/generating timestamps/dates.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `JsonExpressionsSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonSuite`.
Closes#23196 from MaxGekk/json-time-parser.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When using ordinals to access linked list, the time cost is O(n).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23280 from CarolinePeng/update_Two.
Authored-by: CarolinPeng <00244106@zte.intra>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When using a higher-order function with the same variable name as the existing columns in `Filter` or something which uses `Analyzer.resolveExpressionBottomUp` during the resolution, e.g.,:
```scala
val df = Seq(
(Seq(1, 9, 8, 7), 1, 2),
(Seq(5, 9, 7), 2, 2),
(Seq.empty, 3, 2),
(null, 4, 2)
).toDF("i", "x", "d")
checkAnswer(df.filter("exists(i, x -> x % d == 0)"),
Seq(Row(Seq(1, 9, 8, 7), 1, 2)))
checkAnswer(df.select("x").filter("exists(i, x -> x % d == 0)"),
Seq(Row(1)))
```
the following exception happens:
```
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BoundReference cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.NamedExpression
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:62)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach$(ResizableArray.scala:55)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:49)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.$anonfun$functionsForEval$1(higherOrderFunctions.scala:147)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.functionsForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:145)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.functionsForEval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:145)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionsForEval$lzycompute(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionsForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.functionForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.functionForEval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.nullSafeEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.eval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.eval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:185)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.eval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificPredicate.eval(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.$anonfun$doExecute$3(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:216)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.$anonfun$doExecute$3$adapted(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:215)
...
```
because the `UnresolvedAttribute`s in `LambdaFunction` are unexpectedly resolved by the rule.
This pr modified to use a placeholder `UnresolvedNamedLambdaVariable` to prevent unexpected resolution.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test and modified some tests.
Closes#23320 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26370/hof_resolution.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some comments issues left when `ConvertToLocalRelation` rule was added (see #22205/[SPARK-25212](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25212)). This PR fixes those comments issues.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23273 from seancxmao/ConvertToLocalRelation-doc.
Authored-by: seancxmao <seancxmao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
cleanup some tests to make sure expression is resolved during test.
## How was this patch tested?
test-only PR
Closes#23297 from cloud-fan/test.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some documents of `Distribution/Partitioning` are stale and misleading, this PR fixes them:
1. `Distribution` never have intra-partition requirement
2. `OrderedDistribution` does not require tuples that share the same value being colocated in the same partition.
3. `RangePartitioning` can provide a weaker guarantee for a prefix of its `ordering` expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
comment-only PR.
Closes#23249 from cloud-fan/doc.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to return partial results from JSON datasource and JSON functions in the PERMISSIVE mode if some of JSON fields are parsed and converted to desired types successfully. The changes are made only for `StructType`. Whole bad JSON records are placed into the corrupt column specified by the `columnNameOfCorruptRecord` option or SQL config.
Partial results are not returned for malformed JSON input.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new UT which checks converting JSON strings with one invalid and one valid field at the end of the string.
Closes#23253 from MaxGekk/json-bad-record.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
… incorrect.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the reported heartbeat information, the unit of the memory data is bytes, which is converted by the formatBytes() function in the utils.js file before being displayed in the interface. The cardinality of the unit conversion in the formatBytes function is 1000, which should be 1024.
Change the cardinality of the unit conversion in the formatBytes function to 1024.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22683 from httfighter/SPARK-25696.
Lead-authored-by: 韩田田00222924 <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Co-authored-by: han.tiantian@zte.com.cn <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
There are 4 places we need to deal with NaN and -0.0:
1. comparison expressions. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
2. Join keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
3. grouping keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be assigned to the same group. Different NaNs should be assigned to the same group.
4. window partition keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
The case 1 is OK. Our comparison already handles NaN and -0.0, and for struct/array/map, we will recursively compare the fields/elements.
Case 2, 3 and 4 are problematic, as they compare `UnsafeRow` binary directly, and different NaNs have different binary representation, and the same thing happens for -0.0 and 0.0.
To fix it, a simple solution is: normalize float/double when building unsafe data (`UnsafeRow`, `UnsafeArrayData`, `UnsafeMapData`). Then we don't need to worry about it anymore.
Following this direction, this PR moves the handling of NaN and -0.0 from `Platform` to `UnsafeWriter`, so that places like `UnsafeRow.setFloat` will not handle them, which reduces the perf overhead. It's also easier to add comments explaining why we do it in `UnsafeWriter`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23239 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up of #23031 to rename the config name to `spark.sql.legacy.setCommandRejectsSparkCoreConfs`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23245 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26060/rename_config.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently if user provides data schema, partition column values are converted as per it. But if the conversion failed, e.g. converting string to int, the column value is null.
This PR proposes to throw exception in such case, instead of converting into null value silently:
1. These null partition column values doesn't make sense to users in most cases. It is better to show the conversion failure, and then users can adjust the schema or ETL jobs to fix it.
2. There are always exceptions on such conversion failure for non-partition data columns. Partition columns should have the same behavior.
We can reproduce the case above as following:
```
/tmp/testDir
├── p=bar
└── p=foo
```
If we run:
```
val schema = StructType(Seq(StructField("p", IntegerType, false)))
spark.read.schema(schema).csv("/tmp/testDir/").show()
```
We will get:
```
+----+
| p|
+----+
|null|
|null|
+----+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#23215 from gengliangwang/SPARK-26263.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR starts from the [comment](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23124#discussion_r236112390) in the main one and it aims at:
- simplifying the code for `MapConcat`;
- be more precise in checking the limit size.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23217 from mgaido91/SPARK-25829_followup.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we encode a Decimal from external source we don't check for overflow. That method is useful not only in order to enforce that we can represent the correct value in the specified range, but it also changes the underlying data to the right precision/scale. Since in our code generation we assume that a decimal has exactly the same precision and scale of its data type, missing to enforce it can lead to corrupted output/results when there are subsequent transformations.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#23210 from mgaido91/SPARK-26233.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to use **java.time API** for parsing timestamps and dates from CSV content with microseconds precision. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` allow to switch back to previous behaviour with using `java.text.SimpleDateFormat`/`FastDateFormat` for parsing/generating timestamps/dates.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `UnivocityParserSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and `CsvSuite`.
Closes#23150 from MaxGekk/time-parser.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-23711, we have implemented the expression fallback logic to an interpreted mode. So, this pr fixed code to support the same fallback mode in `SafeProjection` based on `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback`.
## How was this patch tested?
Add tests in `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite` and `UnsafeRowConverterSuite`.
Closes#22468 from maropu/SPARK-25374-3.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in the Analyzer, we have two methods 1) Resolve 2)ResolveExpressions that are called at different code paths to resolve attributes, column ordinal and extract value expressions. ~~In this PR, we combine the two into one method to make sure, there is only one method that is tasked with resolving the attributes.~~
Update the description of the methods and use better names to make it easier to know when to make use of one method vs the other.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22899 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-25573-final.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since `AggregationIterator` uses `MutableProjection` for `UnsafeRow`, `InterpretedMutableProjection` needs to handle `UnsafeRow` as buffer internally for fixed-length types only.
## How was this patch tested?
Run 'SQLQueryTestSuite' with the interpreted mode.
Closes#22512 from maropu/InterpreterTest.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For now the `hasMinMaxStats` will return the same as `hasCountStats`, which is obviously not as expected.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23152 from adrian-wang/minmaxstats.
Authored-by: Daoyuan Wang <me@daoyuan.wang>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change behaviour of `UnivocityParser` and `FailureSafeParser`, and return all fields that were parsed and converted to expected types successfully instead of just returning a row with all `null`s for a bad input in the `PERMISSIVE` mode. For example, for CSV line `0,2013-111-11 12:13:14` and DDL schema `a int, b timestamp`, new result is `Row(0, null)`.
## How was this patch tested?
It was checked by existing tests from `CsvSuite` and `CsvFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#23120 from MaxGekk/failuresafe-partial-result.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
How to reproduce this issue:
```scala
scala> val meta = new org.apache.spark.sql.types.MetadataBuilder().putNull("key").build().json
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Metadata$.org$apache$spark$sql$types$Metadata$$toJsonValue(Metadata.scala:196)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Metadata$$anonfun$1.apply(Metadata.scala:180)
```
This pr fix `NullPointerException` when `Metadata` serialize `null` values.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Closes#23164 from wangyum/SPARK-26198.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add headers to empty csv files when header=true, because otherwise these files are invalid when reading.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test for roundtrip of empty dataframe to csv file with headers and back in CSVSuite
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#23173 from koertkuipers/feat-empty-csv-with-header.
Authored-by: Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
UnsupportedOperationException messages are not the same with method name.This PR correct these messages.
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Closes#23154 from lcqzte10192193/wid-lcq-1127.
Authored-by: lichaoqun <li.chaoqun@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
