### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to explain in the description of `removedSQLConfigs` when removed SQL configs should NOT be placed to the map.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make the cases when SQL configs should be added to `removedSQLConfigs` more clear. Recently, `spark.sql.variable.substitute.depth` was removed from the map by #27646 because it contradicts to the condition described by the PR.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By `./dev/scalastyle`
Closes#27653 from MaxGekk/removedSQLConfigs-comment.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark `ConfigEntry` and `ConfigBuilder` missing Spark version information of each configuration at release. This is not good for Spark user when they visiting the page of spark configuration.
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/configuration.html
The new Spark SQL config docs looks like:
```
> SET -v
spark.sql.adaptive.enabled false When true, enable adaptive query execution.
spark.sql.adaptive.nonEmptyPartitionRatioForBroadcastJoin 0.2 The relation with a non-empty partition ratio lower than this config will not be considered as the build side of a broadcast-hash join in adaptive execution regardless of its size.This configuration only has an effect when 'spark.sql.adaptive.enabled' is enabled.
spark.sql.adaptive.optimizeSkewedJoin.enabled true When true and adaptive execution is enabled, a skewed join is automatically handled at runtime.
spark.sql.adaptive.optimizeSkewedJoin.skewedPartitionFactor 10 A partition is considered as a skewed partition if its size is larger than this factor multiple the median partition size and also larger than spark.sql.adaptive.optimizeSkewedJoin.skewedPartitionSizeThreshold
spark.sql.adaptive.optimizeSkewedJoin.skewedPartitionMaxSplits 5 Configures the maximum number of task to handle a skewed partition in adaptive skewedjoin.
spark.sql.adaptive.optimizeSkewedJoin.skewedPartitionSizeThreshold 64MB Configures the minimum size in bytes for a partition that is considered as a skewed partition in adaptive skewed join.
spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.fetchShuffleBlocksInBatch.enabled true Whether to fetch the continuous shuffle blocks in batch. Instead of fetching blocks one by one, fetching continuous shuffle blocks for the same map task in batch can reduce IO and improve performance. Note, multiple continuous blocks exist in single fetch request only happen when 'spark.sql.adaptive.enabled' and 'spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.reducePostShufflePartitions.enabled' is enabled, this feature also depends on a relocatable serializer, the concatenation support codec in use and the new version shuffle fetch protocol.
spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.localShuffleReader.enabled true When true and 'spark.sql.adaptive.enabled' is enabled, this enables the optimization of converting the shuffle reader to local shuffle reader for the shuffle exchange of the broadcast hash join in probe side.
spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.maxNumPostShufflePartitions <undefined> The advisory maximum number of post-shuffle partitions used in adaptive execution. This is used as the initial number of pre-shuffle partitions. By default it equals to spark.sql.shuffle.partitions. This configuration only has an effect when 'spark.sql.adaptive.enabled' and 'spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.reducePostShufflePartitions.enabled' is enabled.
```
**Note**: Because there are so many configuration items that are exposed and require a lot of finishing, I will add the version numbers of these configuration items in another PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
Supplemental configuration version information.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Exists UT
Closes#27592 from beliefer/add-version-to-config.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The style of `EXPLAIN FORMATTED` output needs to be improved. We’ve already got some observations/ideas in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27368#discussion_r376694496https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27368#discussion_r376927143
Observations/Ideas:
1. Using comma as the separator is not clear, especially commas are used inside the expressions too.
2. Show the column counts first? For example, `Results [4]: …`
3. Currently the attribute names are automatically generated, this need to refined.
4. Add arguments field in common implementations as `EXPLAIN EXTENDED` did by calling `argString` in `TreeNode.simpleString`. This will eliminate most existing minor differences between
`EXPLAIN EXTENDED` and `EXPLAIN FORMATTED`.
5. Another improvement we can do is: the generated alias shouldn't include attribute id. collect_set(val, 0, 0)#123 looks clearer than collect_set(val#456, 0, 0)#123
This PR is currently addressing comments 2 & 4, and open for more discussions on improving readability.
### Why are the changes needed?
The readability of `EXPLAIN FORMATTED` need to be improved, which will help user better understand the query plan.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, `EXPLAIN FORMATTED` output style changed.
### How was this patch tested?
Update expect results of test cases in explain.sql
Closes#27509 from Eric5553/ExplainFormattedRefine.
Authored-by: Eric Wu <492960551@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add missing `since` annotation.
- Don't show classes under `org.apache.spark.sql.dynamicpruning` package in API docs.
- Fix the scope of `xxxExactNumeric` to remove it from the API docs.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid leaking APIs unintentionally in Spark 3.0.0.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. All these changes are to avoid leaking APIs unintentionally in Spark 3.0.0.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually generated the API docs and verified the above issues have been fixed.
Closes#27560 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30809.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add the `legacySizeOfNull ` parameter to the `Size` expression, and pass the value of `spark.sql.legacy.sizeOfNull` if `legacySizeOfNull` is not provided on creation of `Size`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows to avoid the issue when the configuration change between different phases of planning, and this can silently break a query plan which can lead to crashes or data corruption.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By `CollectionExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#27658 from MaxGekk/Size-SQLConf-get-deps.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to throw exception by default when user use untyped UDF(a.k.a `org.apache.spark.sql.functions.udf(AnyRef, DataType)`).
And user could still use it by setting `spark.sql.legacy.useUnTypedUdf.enabled` to `true`.
### Why are the changes needed?
According to #23498, since Spark 3.0, the untyped UDF will return the default value of the Java type if the input value is null. For example, `val f = udf((x: Int) => x, IntegerType)`, `f($"x")` will return 0 in Spark 3.0 but null in Spark 2.4. And the behavior change is introduced due to Spark3.0 is built with Scala 2.12 by default.
As a result, this might change data silently and may cause correctness issue if user still expect `null` in some cases. Thus, we'd better to encourage user to use typed UDF to avoid this problem.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yeah. User will hit exception now when use untyped UDF.
### How was this patch tested?
Added test and updated some tests.
Closes#27488 from Ngone51/spark_26580_followup.
Lead-authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: wuyi <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit bef5d9d6c3.
### Why are the changes needed?
Revert it according to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24902#issuecomment-584511167.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#27540 from Ngone51/revert_spark_28093.
Lead-authored-by: wuyi <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Exclude the SQL config `spark.sql.variable.substitute.depth` from `SQLConf.removedSQLConfigs`
### Why are the changes needed?
By the #27169, the config was placed to `SQLConf.removedSQLConfigs`. And as a consequence of that when an user set it non-default value (1 for example), he/she will get an exception. It is acceptable for SQL configs that could impact on the behavior but not for this particular config. Raising of such exception will just make migration to Spark 3.0 more difficult.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, before the changes users get an exception when he/she set `spark.sql.variable.substitute.depth` to a value different from `40`.
### How was this patch tested?
Run `spark.conf.set("spark.sql.variable.substitute.depth", 1)` in `spark-shell`.
Closes#27646 from MaxGekk/remove-substitute-depth-conf.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Output warnings for deprecated SQL configs in `SQLConf. setConfWithCheck()` and in `SQLConf. unsetConf()`
- Throw an exception for removed SQL configs in `SQLConf. setConfWithCheck()` when they set to non-default values
- Remove checking of deprecated and removed SQL configs from RuntimeConfig
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, warnings/exceptions are printed only when a SQL config is set dynamically, for instance via `spark.conf.set()`. After the changes, removed/deprecated SQL configs will be checked when they set statically. For example:
```
$ bin/spark-shell --conf spark.sql.fromJsonForceNullableSchema=false
scala> spark.emptyDataFrame
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error while instantiating 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSessionStateBuilder':
...
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: The SQL config 'spark.sql.fromJsonForceNullableSchema' was removed in the version 3.0.0. It was removed to prevent errors like SPARK-23173 for non-default value.
```
```
$ bin/spark-shell --conf spark.sql.hive.verifyPartitionPath=false
scala> spark.emptyDataFrame
20/02/20 02:10:26 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.hive.verifyPartitionPath' has been deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. This config is replaced by 'spark.files.ignoreMissingFiles'.
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
By `SQLConfSuite`
Closes#27645 from MaxGekk/remove-sql-configs-followup-2.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add the `returnLong` parameter to `IntegralDivide`, and pass the value of `spark.sql.legacy.integralDivide.returnBigint` if `returnLong` is not provided on creation of `IntegralDivide`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows to avoid the issue when the configuration change between different phases of planning, and this can silently break a query plan which can lead to crashes or data corruption.
OptionsAttachments
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By `ArithmeticExpressionSuite`.
Closes#27628 from MaxGekk/integral-divide-conf.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revise the doc of SQL configuration `spark.sql.sources.parallelPartitionDiscovery.threshold`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The doc of configuration "spark.sql.sources.parallelPartitionDiscovery.threshold" is not accurate on the part "This applies to Parquet, ORC, CSV, JSON and LibSVM data sources".
We should revise it as effective on all the file-based data sources.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
None. It's just doc.
Closes#27639 from gengliangwang/reviseParallelPartitionDiscovery.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### Why are the changes needed?
This ports the tests introduced in 7285eea683 to master to avoid future regressions.
### Background
A query with Common Table Expressions can cause a stack overflow when it contains a CTE that refers a non-existing table with the same name. The name of the table need to have a database qualifier. This is caused by a couple of things:
- CTESubstitution runs analysis on the CTE, but this does not throw an exception because the table has a database qualifier. The reason is that we don't fail is because we re-attempt to resolve the relation in a later rule;
- CTESubstitution replace logic does not check if the table it is replacing has a database, it shouldn't replace the relation if it does. So now we will happily replace nonexist.t with t;
Note that this not an issue for master or the spark-3.0 branch.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added regression test to `AnalysisErrorSuite` and `DataFrameSuite`.
Closes#27635 from hvanhovell/SPARK-30811-master.
Authored-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow up in [PR#27563](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27563).
This PR adds the prefix of "skewedJoinOptimization" in the skew join related configs.
### Why are the changes needed?
address remaining address
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
only update config and no need new ut.
Closes#27630 from JkSelf/renameskewjoinconfig.
Authored-by: jiake <ke.a.jia@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reverts https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26325 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26347
### Why are the changes needed?
When we do sum/avg, we need a wider type of input to hold the sum value, to reduce the possibility of overflow. For example, we use long to hold the sum of integral inputs, use double to hold the sum of float/double.
However, we don't have a wider type of interval. Also the semantic is unclear: what if the days field overflows but the months field doesn't? Currently the avg of `1 month` and `2 month` is `1 month 15 days`, which assumes 1 month has 30 days and we should avoid this assumption.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, remove 2 features added in 3.0
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27619 from cloud-fan/revert.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Prefix by `ansi_` in `toString` if it's a `AnsiCast` or ansi enabled `Cast`.
E.g. run `spark.sql("select cast('51' as int)").queryExecution.analyzed` under ansi mode.
Before this PR:
```
Project [cast(51 as int) AS CAST(51 AS INT)#0]
+- OneRowRelation
```
After this PR:
```
Project [ansi_cast(51 as int) AS CAST(51 AS INT)#0]
+- OneRowRelation
```
### Why are the changes needed?
This is useful while comparing `LogicalPlan`s literally.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#27608 from Ngone51/ansi_cast_tostring.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to port Scala's bugfix https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/7693 (Scala 2.13) to address https://github.com/scala/bug/issues/10495 issue.
In short, it is possible for different product instances having the same children to have the same hash. See:
```scala
scala> spark.range(1).selectExpr("id - 1").queryExecution.analyzed.semanticHash()
res0: Int = -565572825
scala> spark.range(1).selectExpr("id + 1").queryExecution.analyzed.semanticHash()
res1: Int = -565572825
```
### Why are the changes needed?
It was found during the review of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27565. We should better produce different hash for different objects.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it's not identified. Possibly performance related issue.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and unittest was added.
Closes#27601 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-30847.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ALTER TABLE, a column in ADD COLUMNS can depend on the position of a column that is just being added. For example, for a table with the following schema:
```
root:
- a: string
- b: long
```
, the following should work:
```
ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMNS (x int AFTER a, y int AFTER x)
```
Currently, the above statement will throw an exception saying that AFTER x cannot be resolved, because x doesn't exist yet. This PR proposes to fix this issue.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug described above.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now
```
ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMNS (x int AFTER a, y int AFTER x)
```
works as expected.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests
Closes#27584 from imback82/alter_table_pos_fix.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I checked the all the window function and found all of them not add parameter information and version information to the document.
This PR will make a supplement.
### Why are the changes needed?
Documentation is missing and does not meet new standards.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. User will face the information of parameters and version.
### How was this patch tested?
Exists UT
Closes#27572 from beliefer/add_since_for_window_function.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Define a new enumeration `LegacyBehaviorPolicy` in SQLConf, it will be used as the common value for result change configs.
### Why are the changes needed?
During API auditing for the 3.0 release, we found several new approaches that will change the results silently. For these features, we need a common three-value config.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, original config `spark.sql.legacy.ctePrecedence.enabled` change to `spark.sql.legacy.ctePrecedencePolicy`.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#27579 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30829.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to replace `%` by `Math.floorMod` in `DateTimeUtils.truncTimestamp` for the `SECOND` and `MINUTE` levels.
### Why are the changes needed?
This fixes the issue of incorrect truncation of timestamps before the epoch `1970-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z` to the `SECOND` and `MINUTE` levels. For example, timestamps after the epoch are truncated by cutting off the rest part of the timestamp:
```sql
spark-sql> select date_trunc('SECOND', '2020-02-11 00:01:02.123');
2020-02-11 00:01:02
```
but seconds in the truncated timestamp before the epoch are increased by 1:
```sql
spark-sql> select date_trunc('SECOND', '1960-02-11 00:01:02.123');
1960-02-11 00:01:03
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the example above outputs correct result:
```sql
spark-sql> select date_trunc('SECOND', '1960-02-11 00:01:02.123');
1960-02-11 00:01:02
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests to `DateFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#27543 from MaxGekk/fix-second-minute-truc.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up for #23124, add a new config `spark.sql.legacy.allowDuplicatedMapKeys` to control the behavior of removing duplicated map keys in build-in functions. With the default value `false`, Spark will throw a RuntimeException while duplicated keys are found.
### Why are the changes needed?
Prevent silent behavior changes.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, new config added and the default behavior for duplicated map keys changed to RuntimeException thrown.
### How was this patch tested?
Modify existing UT.
Closes#27478 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-25892-follow.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Rewrite DateTimeUtils methods `getHours()`, `getMinutes()`, `getSeconds()`, `getSecondsWithFraction()`, `getMilliseconds()` and `getMicroseconds()` using Java 8 time APIs. This will automatically switch the `Hour`, `Minute`, `Second` and `DatePart` expressions on Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
2. Remove unused methods and constant of DateTimeUtils - `to2001`, `YearZero `, `toYearZero` and `absoluteMicroSecond()`.
3. Remove unused value `timeZone` from `TimeZoneAwareExpression` since all expressions have been migrated to Java 8 time API, and legacy instance of `TimeZone` is not needed any more.
4. Change signatures of modified DateTimeUtils methods, and pass `ZoneId` instead of `TimeZone`. This will allow to avoid unnecessary conversions `TimeZone` -> `String` -> `ZoneId`.
5. Modify tests in `DateTimeUtilsSuite` and in `DateExpressionsSuite` to pass `ZoneId` instead of `TimeZone`. Correct the tests, to pass tested zone id instead of None.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix the issue of wrong results returned by the `hour()`, `minute()`, `second()`, `date_part('millisecond', ...)` and `date_part('microsecond', ....)`, see example in [SPARK-30843](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30843).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the results of examples from SPARK-30843:
```sql
spark-sql> select hour(timestamp '0010-01-01 00:00:00');
0
spark-sql> select minute(timestamp '0010-01-01 00:00:00');
0
spark-sql> select second(timestamp '0010-01-01 00:00:00');
0
spark-sql> select date_part('milliseconds', timestamp '0010-01-01 00:00:00');
0.000
spark-sql> select date_part('microseconds', timestamp '0010-01-01 00:00:00');
0
```
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite` and `DateFunctionsSuite`.
- Add new tests to `DateExpressionsSuite` and `DateTimeUtilsSuite` for 10 year, like:
```scala
input = date(10, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, zonePST)
assert(getHours(input, zonePST) === 0)
```
- Re-run `DateTimeBenchmark` using Amazon EC2.
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) |
| Java | OpenJDK8/11 |
Closes#27596 from MaxGekk/localtimestamp-greg-cal.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@ip-172-31-1-30.us-west-2.compute.internal>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
No v2 command supports temp views and the `ResolveCatalogs`/`ResolveSessionCatalog` framework is designed with this assumption.
However, `ResolveSessionCatalog` needs to fallback to v1 commands, which do support temp views (e.g. CACHE TABLE). To work around it, we add a hack in `CatalogAndIdentifier`, which does not expand the given identifier with current namespace if the catalog is session catalog.
This works fine in most cases, as temp views should take precedence over tables during lookup. So if `CatalogAndIdentifier` returns a single name "t", the v1 commands can still resolve it to temp views correctly, or resolve it to table "default.t" if temp view doesn't exist.
However, if users write `spark_catalog.t`, it shouldn't be resolved to temp views as temp views don't belong to any catalog. `CatalogAndIdentifier` can't distinguish between `spark_catalog.t` and `t`, so the caller side may mistakenly resolve `spark_catalog.t` to a temp view.
This PR proposes to fix this issue by
1. remove the hack in `CatalogAndIdentifier`, and clearly document that this shouldn't be used to resolve temp views.
2. update `ResolveSessionCatalog` to explicitly look up temp views first before calling `CatalogAndIdentifier`, for v1 commands that support temp views.
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid releasing a behavior that we should not support.
Removing the hack also fixes the problem we hit in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27532/files#diff-57b3d87be744b7d79a9beacf8e5e5eb2R937
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, now it's not allowed to refer to a temp view with `spark_catalog` prefix.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27550 from cloud-fan/ns.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. `InMemoryTable` was flatting the nested columns, and then the flatten columns was used to look up the indices which is not correct.
This PR implements partitioned by nested column for `InMemoryTable`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR implements partitioned by nested column for `InMemoryTable`, so we can test this features in DSv2
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests and new tests.
Closes#26929 from dbtsai/addTests.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to use Java 8 time API in timestamp truncations to the levels of `HOUR` and `DAY`. The problem is in the usage of `timeZone.getOffset(millis)` in days/hours truncations where the combined calendar (Julian + Gregorian) is used underneath.
### Why are the changes needed?
The change fix wrong truncations. For example, the following truncation to hours should print `0010-01-01 01:00:00` but it outputs wrong timestamp:
```scala
Seq("0010-01-01 01:02:03.123456").toDF()
.select($"value".cast("timestamp").as("ts"))
.select(date_trunc("HOUR", $"ts").cast("string"))
.show(false)
+------------------------------------+
|CAST(date_trunc(HOUR, ts) AS STRING)|
+------------------------------------+
|0010-01-01 01:30:17 |
+------------------------------------+
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the result of the example above is:
```scala
+------------------------------------+
|CAST(date_trunc(HOUR, ts) AS STRING)|
+------------------------------------+
|0010-01-01 01:00:00 |
+------------------------------------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
- Added new test to `DateFunctionsSuite`
- By `DateExpressionsSuite` and `DateTimeUtilsSuite`
Closes#27512 from MaxGekk/fix-trunc-old-timestamp.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support Hive-style `ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE COLUMNS ...` as described in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL#LanguageManualDDL-Add/ReplaceColumns
The user now can do the following:
```SQL
CREATE TABLE t (col1 int, col2 int) USING Foo;
ALTER TABLE t REPLACE COLUMNS (col2 string COMMENT 'comment2', col3 int COMMENT 'comment3');
```
, which drops the existing columns `col1` and `col2`, and add new columns `col2` and `col3`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a new DDL statement. Spark currently supports the Hive-style `ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE COLUMN ...`, so this new addition can be useful.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, adding a new DDL statement.
### How was this patch tested?
More tests to be added.
Closes#27482 from imback82/replace_cols.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a config for Dynamic Partition Pruning subquery duplication and turns it off by default due to its potential performance regression.
When planning a DPP filter, it seeks to reuse the broadcast exchange relation if the corresponding join is a BHJ with the filter relation being on the build side, otherwise it will either opt out or plan the filter as an un-reusable subquery duplication based on the cost estimate. However, the cost estimate is not accurate and only takes into account the table scan overhead, thus adding an un-reusable subquery duplication DPP filter can sometimes cause perf regression.
This PR turns off the subquery duplication DPP filter by:
1. adding a config `spark.sql.optimizer.dynamicPartitionPruning.reuseBroadcastOnly` and setting it `true` by default.
2. removing the existing meaningless config `spark.sql.optimizer.dynamicPartitionPruning.reuseBroadcast` since we always want to reuse broadcast results if possible.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is to fix a potential performance regression caused by DPP.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated DynamicPartitionPruningSuite to test the new configuration.
Closes#27551 from maryannxue/spark-30528.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`spark.sql("select map()")` returns {}.
After these changes it will return map<null,null>
### Why are the changes needed?
After changes introduced due to #27521, it is important to maintain consistency while using map().
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now map() will give map<null,null> instead of {}.
### How was this patch tested?
UT added. Migration guide updated as well
Closes#27542 from iRakson/SPARK-30790.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to rewrite the `millisToDays` and `daysToMillis` of `DateTimeUtils` using Java 8 time API.
I removed `getOffsetFromLocalMillis` from `DateTimeUtils` because it is a private methods, and is not used anymore in Spark SQL.
### Why are the changes needed?
New implementation is based on Proleptic Gregorian calendar which has been already used by other date-time functions. This changes make `millisToDays` and `daysToMillis` consistent to rest Spark SQL API related to date & time operations.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, this might effect behavior for old dates before 1582 year.
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, DateExpressionsSuite`, `SQLQuerySuite` and `HiveResultSuite`.
Closes#27494 from MaxGekk/millis-2-days-java8-api.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added new test to `RegexpExpressionsSuite` which checks that `cache` of compiled pattern is set when the `right` expression (pattern in `LIKE`) is a foldable expression.
### Why are the changes needed?
To be sure that `cache` in `StringRegexExpression` is initialized for foldable patterns.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the added test in `RegexpExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#27547 from MaxGekk/regexp-cache-test.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add legacy date/timestamp formatters based on `SimpleDateFormat` and `FastDateFormat`:
- `LegacyFastTimestampFormatter` - uses `FastDateFormat` and supports parsing/formatting in microsecond precision. The code was borrowed from Spark 2.4, see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26507 & https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26582
- `LegacySimpleTimestampFormatter` uses `SimpleDateFormat`, and support the `lenient` mode. When the `lenient` parameter is set to `false`, the parser become much stronger in checking its input.
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark 2.4.x uses the following parsers for parsing/formatting date/timestamp strings:
- `DateTimeFormat` in CSV/JSON datasource
- `SimpleDateFormat` - is used in JDBC datasource, in partitions parsing.
- `SimpleDateFormat` in strong mode (`lenient = false`), see https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-2.4/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala#L124. It is used by the `date_format`, `from_unixtime`, `unix_timestamp` and `to_unix_timestamp` functions.
The PR aims to make Spark 3.0 compatible with Spark 2.4.x in all those cases when `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` is set to `true`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
This shouldn't change behavior with default settings. If `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` is set to `true`, users should observe behavior of Spark 2.4.
### How was this patch tested?
- Modified tests in `DateExpressionsSuite` to check the legacy parser - `SimpleDateFormat`.
- Added `CSVLegacyTimeParserSuite` and `JsonLegacyTimeParserSuite` to run `CSVSuite` and `JsonSuite` with the legacy parser - `FastDateFormat`.
Closes#27524 from MaxGekk/timestamp-formatter-legacy-fallback.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implement of `regexp_extract` will throws a unprocessed exception show below:
`SELECT regexp_extract('1a 2b 14m', 'd+')`
```
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: No group 1
[info] at java.util.regex.Matcher.group(Matcher.java:538)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:729)
```
I think should treat this exception well.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a bug `java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException No group 1 `
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
New UT
Closes#27508 from beliefer/fix-regexp_extract-bug.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to make the `code` string interpolator treat escapes the same way as Scala's builtin `StringContext.s()` string interpolator. This will remove the need for an ugly workaround in `Like` expression's codegen.
### Why are the changes needed?
The `code()` string interpolator in Spark SQL's code generator should treat escapes like Scala's builtin `StringContext.s()` interpolator, i.e. it should treat escapes in the code parts, and should not treat escapes in the input arguments.
For example,
```scala
val arg = "This is an argument."
val str = s"This is string part 1. $arg This is string part 2."
val code = code"This is string part 1. $arg This is string part 2."
assert(code.toString == str)
```
We should expect the `code()` interpolator to produce the same result as the `StringContext.s()` interpolator, where only escapes in the string parts should be treated, while the args should be kept verbatim.
But in the current implementation, due to the eager folding of code parts and literal input args, the escape treatment is incorrectly done on both code parts and literal args.
That causes a problem when an arg contains escape sequences and wants to preserve that in the final produced code string. For example, in `Like` expression's codegen, there's an ugly workaround for this bug:
```scala
// We need double escape to avoid org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException.
// '\\' will cause exception 'Single quote must be backslash-escaped in character literal'.
// '\"' will cause exception 'Line break in literal not allowed'.
val newEscapeChar = if (escapeChar == '\"' || escapeChar == '\\') {
s"""\\\\\\$escapeChar"""
} else {
escapeChar
}
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a new unit test case in `CodeBlockSuite`.
Closes#27544 from rednaxelafx/fix-code-string-interpolator.
Authored-by: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to revert the commit 8aebc80e0e.
### Why are the changes needed?
See the concerns https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27355#issuecomment-584344438
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites.
Closes#27531 from MaxGekk/revert-like-3-args.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds some more information and context to `spark.sql.defaultUrlStreamHandlerFactory.enabled`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It is a bit difficult to understand the documentation of `spark.sql.defaultUrlStreamHandlerFactory.enabled`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Nope, internal doc only fix.
### How was this patch tested?
Nope. I only tested linter.
Closes#27541 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-29462-followup.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the case of back-to-back calculation of `floorDiv` and `floorMod` with the same arguments, the result of `foorDiv` can be reused in calculation of `floorMod`. The `floorMod` method is defined as the following in Java standard library:
```java
public static int floorMod(int x, int y) {
int r = x - floorDiv(x, y) * y;
return r;
}
```
If `floorDiv(x, y)` has been already calculated, it can be reused in `x - floorDiv(x, y) * y`.
I propose to modify 2 places in `DateTimeUtils`:
1. `microsToInstant` which is widely used in many date-time functions. `Math.floorMod(us, MICROS_PER_SECOND)` is just replaced by its definition from Java Math library.
2. `truncDate`: `Math.floorMod(oldYear, divider) == 0` is replaced by `Math.floorDiv(oldYear, divider) * divider == oldYear` where `floorDiv(...) * divider` is pre-calculated.
### Why are the changes needed?
This reduces the number of arithmetic operations, and can slightly improve performance of date-time functions.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite` and `DateExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#27491 from MaxGekk/opt-microsToInstant.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This brings https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26324 back. It was reverted basically because, firstly Hive compatibility, and the lack of investigations in other DBMSes and ANSI.
- In case of PostgreSQL seems coercing NULL literal to TEXT type.
- Presto seems coercing `array() + array(1)` -> array of int.
- Hive seems `array() + array(1)` -> array of strings
Given that, the design choices have been differently made for some reasons. If we pick one of both, seems coercing to array of int makes much more sense.
Another investigation was made offline internally. Seems ANSI SQL 2011, section 6.5 "<contextually typed value specification>" states:
> If ES is specified, then let ET be the element type determined by the context in which ES appears. The declared type DT of ES is Case:
>
> a) If ES simply contains ARRAY, then ET ARRAY[0].
>
> b) If ES simply contains MULTISET, then ET MULTISET.
>
> ES is effectively replaced by CAST ( ES AS DT )
From reading other related context, doing it to `NullType`. Given the investigation made, choosing to `null` seems correct, and we have a reference Presto now. Therefore, this PR proposes to bring it back.
### Why are the changes needed?
When empty array is created, it should be declared as array<null>.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, `array()` creates `array<null>`. Now `array(1) + array()` can correctly create `array(1)` instead of `array("1")`.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested manually
Closes#27521 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-29462.
Lead-authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Aman Omer <amanomer1996@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Fix the scope of `Logging.initializeForcefully` so that it doesn't appear in subclasses' public methods. Right now, `sc.initializeForcefully(false, false)` is allowed to called.
- Don't show classes under `org.apache.spark.internal` package in API docs.
- Add missing `since` annotation.
- Fix the scope of `ArrowUtils` to remove it from the API docs.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid leaking APIs unintentionally in Spark 3.0.0.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. All these changes are to avoid leaking APIs unintentionally in Spark 3.0.0.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually generated the API docs and verified the above issues have been fixed.
Closes#27528 from zsxwing/audit-ss-apis.
Authored-by: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix `cache` initialization in `StringRegexExpression` by changing `case Literal(value: String, StringType)` to `case p: Expression if p.foldable`
### Why are the changes needed?
Actually, the case doesn't work at all because of:
1. Literals value has type `UTF8String`
2. It doesn't work for foldable expressions like in the example:
```sql
SELECT '%SystemDrive%\Users\John' _FUNC_ '%SystemDrive%\\Users.*';
```
<img width="649" alt="Screen Shot 2020-02-08 at 22 45 50" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1580697/74091681-0d4a2180-4acb-11ea-8a0d-7e8c65f4214e.png">
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By the `check outputs of expression examples` test from `SQLQuerySuite`.
Closes#27502 from MaxGekk/str-regexp-foldable-pattern.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 8ce7962931. There's variable name conflicts with 8aebc80e0e (diff-39298b470865a4cbc67398a4ea11e767).
This can be cleanly ported back to branch-3.0.
### Why are the changes needed?
Performance investigation were not made enough and it's not clear if it really beneficial or now.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Closes#27514 from HyukjinKwon/revert-cache-PR.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enhance RuleExecutor strategy to take different actions when exceeding max iterations. And raise exception if analyzer exceed max iterations.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, both analyzer and optimizer just log warning message if rule execution exceed max iterations. They should have different behavior. Analyzer should raise exception to indicates the plan is not fixed after max iterations, while optimizer just log warning to keep the current plan. This is more feasible after SPARK-30138 was introduced.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Add test in AnalysisSuite
Closes#26977 from Eric5553/EnhanceMaxIterations.
Authored-by: Eric Wu <492960551@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR updates the documentation on `TableCatalog.alterTable`s behavior on the order by which the requested changes are applied. It now explicitly mentions that the changes are applied in the order given.
### Why are the changes needed?
The current documentation on `TableCatalog.alterTable` doesn't mention which order the requested changes are applied. It will be useful to explicitly document this behavior so that the user can expect the behavior. For example, `REPLACE COLUMNS` needs to delete columns before adding new columns, and if the order is guaranteed by `alterTable`, it's much easier to work with the catalog API.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, document change.
### How was this patch tested?
Not added (doc changes).
Closes#27496 from imback82/catalog_table_alter_table.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
This reverts commit a0e63b61e7.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts the patch at #26978 based on gatorsmile's suggestion.
### Why are the changes needed?
Original patch #26978 has not considered a corner case. We may need to put more time on ensuring we can cover all cases.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#27504 from viirya/revert-SPARK-29721.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up for #25029, in this PR we throw an AnalysisException when name conflict is detected in nested WITH clause. In this way, the config `spark.sql.legacy.ctePrecedence.enabled` should be set explicitly for the expected behavior.
### Why are the changes needed?
The original change might risky to end-users, it changes behavior silently.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, change the config `spark.sql.legacy.ctePrecedence.enabled` as optional.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT.
Closes#27454 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-28228-follow.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current ALTER COLUMN syntax allows to change multiple properties at a time:
```
ALTER TABLE table=multipartIdentifier
(ALTER | CHANGE) COLUMN? column=multipartIdentifier
(TYPE dataType)?
(COMMENT comment=STRING)?
colPosition?
```
The SQL standard (section 11.12) only allows changing one property at a time. This is also true on other recent SQL systems like [snowflake](https://docs.snowflake.net/manuals/sql-reference/sql/alter-table-column.html) and [redshift](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/r_ALTER_TABLE.html). (credit to cloud-fan)
This PR proposes to change ALTER COLUMN to follow SQL standard, thus allows altering only one column property at a time.
Note that ALTER COLUMN syntax being changed here is newly added in Spark 3.0, so it doesn't affect Spark 2.4 behavior.
### Why are the changes needed?
To follow SQL standard (and other recent SQL systems) behavior.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now the user can update the column properties only one at a time.
For example,
```
ALTER TABLE table1 ALTER COLUMN a.b.c TYPE bigint COMMENT 'new comment'
```
should be broken into
```
ALTER TABLE table1 ALTER COLUMN a.b.c TYPE bigint
ALTER TABLE table1 ALTER COLUMN a.b.c COMMENT 'new comment'
```
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests.
Closes#27444 from imback82/alter_column_one_at_a_time.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Rewrite the `convertTz` method of `DateTimeUtils` using Java 8 time API
- Change types of `convertTz` parameters from `TimeZone` to `ZoneId`. This allows to avoid unnecessary conversions `TimeZone` -> `ZoneId` and performance regressions as a consequence.
### Why are the changes needed?
- Fixes incorrect behavior of `to_utc_timestamp` on daylight saving day. For example:
```scala
scala> df.select(to_utc_timestamp(lit("2019-11-03T12:00:00"), "Asia/Hong_Kong").as("local UTC")).show
+-------------------+
| local UTC|
+-------------------+
|2019-11-03 03:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
but the result must be 2019-11-03 04:00:00:
<img width="1013" alt="Screen Shot 2020-02-06 at 20 09 36" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1580697/73960846-a129bb00-491c-11ea-92f5-45831cb28a62.png">
- Simplifies the code, and make it more maintainable
- Switches `convertTz` on Proleptic Gregorian calendar used by Java 8 time classes by default. That makes the function consistent to other date-time functions.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, after the changes `to_utc_timestamp` returns the correct result `2019-11-03 04:00:00`.
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing test suite `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite` and `DateExpressionsSuite`.
- Added `convert time zones on a daylight saving day` to DateFunctionsSuite
Closes#27474 from MaxGekk/port-convertTz-on-Java8-api.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
