…Type
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modifed JdbcUtils.makeGetter to handle ByteType.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test to JDBCSuite that maps ```TINYINT``` to ```ByteType```.
Closes#23400 from twdsilva/tiny_int_support.
Authored-by: Thomas D'Silva <tdsilva@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current `SelectedField` extractor is somewhat complicated and it seems to be handling cases that should be handled automatically:
- `GetArrayItem(child: GetStructFieldObject())`
- `GetArrayStructFields(child: GetArrayStructFields())`
- `GetMap(value: GetStructFieldObject())`
This PR removes those cases and simplifies the extractor by passing down the data type instead of a field.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23397 from hvanhovell/SPARK-26495.
Authored-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As the description in SPARK-26339, spark.read behavior is very confusing when reading files that start with underscore, fix this by throwing exception which message is "Path does not exist".
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests.
Both of codes below throws exception which message is "Path does not exist".
```
spark.read.csv("/home/forcia/work/spark/_test.csv")
spark.read.schema("test STRING, number INT").csv("/home/forcia/work/spark/_test.csv")
```
Closes#23288 from KeiichiHirobe/SPARK-26339.
Authored-by: Hirobe Keiichi <keiichi_hirobe@forcia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Proposed new class `StringConcat` for converting a sequence of strings to string with one memory allocation in the `toString` method. `StringConcat` replaces `StringBuilderWriter` in methods of dumping of Spark plans and codegen to strings.
All `Writer` arguments are replaced by `String => Unit` in methods related to Spark plans stringification.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing suites `QueryExecutionSuite`, `DebuggingSuite` as well as new tests for `StringConcat` in `StringUtilsSuite`.
Closes#23406 from MaxGekk/rope-plan.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#20560/[SPARK-23375](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23375) introduced an optimizer rule to eliminate redundant Sort. For a test case named "Sort metrics" in `SQLMetricsSuite`, because range is already sorted, sort is removed by the `RemoveRedundantSorts`, which makes this test case meaningless.
This PR modifies the query for testing Sort metrics and checks Sort exists in the plan.
## How was this patch tested?
Modify the existing test case.
Closes#23258 from seancxmao/sort-metrics.
Authored-by: seancxmao <seancxmao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar with https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21446. Looks random string is not quite safe as a directory name.
```scala
scala> val prefix = Random.nextString(10); val dir = new File("/tmp", "del_" + prefix + "-" + UUID.randomUUID.toString); dir.mkdirs()
prefix: String = 窽텘⒘駖ⵚ駢⡞Ρ닋
dir: java.io.File = /tmp/del_窽텘⒘駖ⵚ駢⡞Ρ닋-a3f99855-c429-47a0-a108-47bca6905745
res40: Boolean = false // nope, didn't like this one
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test was added, and manually.
Closes#23405 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26496.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add `maxFields` parameter to all functions involved in creation of textual representation of spark plans such as `simpleString` and `verboseString`. New parameter restricts number of fields converted to truncated strings. Any elements beyond the limit will be dropped and replaced by a `"... N more fields"` placeholder. The threshold is bumped up to `Int.MaxValue` for `toFile()`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `QueryExecutionSuite` which checks `maxFields` impacts on number of truncated fields in `LocalRelation`.
Closes#23159 from MaxGekk/to-file-max-fields.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark SQL doesn't support creating partitioned table using Hive CTAS in SQL syntax. However it is supported by using DataFrameWriter API.
```scala
val df = Seq(("a", 1)).toDF("part", "id")
df.write.format("hive").partitionBy("part").saveAsTable("t")
```
Hive begins to support this syntax in newer version: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20241:
```
CREATE TABLE t PARTITIONED BY (part) AS SELECT 1 as id, "a" as part
```
This patch adds this support to SQL syntax.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#23376 from viirya/hive-ctas-partitioned-table.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch the `DateFormatClass`, `ToUnixTimestamp`, `FromUnixTime`, `UnixTime` on java.time API for parsing/formatting dates and timestamps. The API has been already implemented by the `Timestamp`/`DateFormatter` classes. One of benefit is those classes support parsing timestamps with microsecond precision. Old behaviour can be switched on via SQL config: `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` (`false` by default).
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing test suites - `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`, `JsonSuite`, `CsvSuite`, `SQLQueryTestSuite` as well as PySpark tests.
Closes#23358 from MaxGekk/new-time-cast.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PRs #23150 and #23196 switched JSON and CSV datasources on new formatter for dates/timestamps which is based on `DateTimeFormatter`. In this PR, I replaced `SimpleDateFormat` by `DateTimeFormatter` to reflect the changes.
Closes#23374 from MaxGekk/java-time-docs.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
GetStructField with different optional names should be semantically equal. We will use this as building block to compare the nested fields used in the plans to be optimized by catalyst optimizer.
This PR also fixes a bug below that accessing nested fields with different cases in case insensitive mode will result `AnalysisException`.
```
sql("create table t (s struct<i: Int>) using json")
sql("select s.I from t group by s.i")
```
which is currently failing
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: expression 'default.t.`s`' is neither present in the group by, nor is it an aggregate function
```
as cloud-fan pointed out.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests are added.
Closes#23353 from dbtsai/nestedEqual.
Lead-authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: DB Tsai <dbtsai@dbtsai.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use of `ProcessingTime` class was deprecated in favor of `Trigger.ProcessingTime` in Spark 2.2. And, [SPARK-21464](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21464) minimized it at 2.2.1. Recently, it grows again in test suites. This PR aims to clean up newly introduced deprecation warnings for Spark 3.0.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with existing tests and manually check the warnings.
Closes#23367 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-26428.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23178 , to keep binary compability by using abstract class.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test. I created a simple app with Spark 2.4
```
object TryUDF {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
val spark = SparkSession.builder().appName("test").master("local[*]").getOrCreate()
import spark.implicits._
val f1 = udf((i: Int) => i + 1)
println(f1.deterministic)
spark.range(10).select(f1.asNonNullable().apply($"id")).show()
spark.stop()
}
}
```
When I run it with current master, it fails with
```
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found interface org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.UserDefinedFunction, but class was expected
```
When I run it with this PR, it works
Closes#23351 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, even if I explicitly disable Hive support in SparkR session as below:
```r
sparkSession <- sparkR.session("local[4]", "SparkR", Sys.getenv("SPARK_HOME"),
enableHiveSupport = FALSE)
```
produces when the Hadoop version is not supported by our Hive fork:
```
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
...
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unrecognized Hadoop major version number: 3.1.1.3.1.0.0-78
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.shims.ShimLoader.getMajorVersion(ShimLoader.java:174)
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.shims.ShimLoader.loadShims(ShimLoader.java:139)
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.shims.ShimLoader.getHadoopShims(ShimLoader.java:100)
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.conf.HiveConf$ConfVars.<clinit>(HiveConf.java:368)
... 43 more
Error in handleErrors(returnStatus, conn) :
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.conf.HiveConf.<clinit>(HiveConf.java:105)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:348)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.classForName(Utils.scala:193)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$.hiveClassesArePresent(SparkSession.scala:1116)
at org.apache.spark.sql.api.r.SQLUtils$.getOrCreateSparkSession(SQLUtils.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.sql.api.r.SQLUtils.getOrCreateSparkSession(SQLUtils.scala)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
```
The root cause is that:
```
SparkSession.hiveClassesArePresent
```
check if the class is loadable or not to check if that's in classpath but `org.apache.hadoop.hive.conf.HiveConf` has a check for Hadoop version as static logic which is executed right away. This throws an `IllegalArgumentException` and that's not caught:
36edbac1c8/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala (L1113-L1121)
So, currently, if users have a Hive built-in Spark with unsupported Hadoop version by our fork (namely 3+), there's no way to use SparkR even though it could work.
This PR just propose to change the order of bool comparison so that we can don't execute `SparkSession.hiveClassesArePresent` when:
1. `enableHiveSupport` is explicitly disabled
2. `spark.sql.catalogImplementation` is `in-memory`
so that we **only** check `SparkSession.hiveClassesArePresent` when Hive support is explicitly enabled by short circuiting.
## How was this patch tested?
It's difficult to write a test since we don't run tests against Hadoop 3 yet. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21588. Manually tested.
Closes#23356 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26422.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`HadoopFileWholeTextReader` and `HadoopFileLinesReader` will be eventually called in `FileSourceScanExec`.
In fact, locality has been implemented in `FileScanRDD`, even if we implement it in `HadoopFileWholeTextReader ` and `HadoopFileLinesReader`, it would be useless.
So I think these `TODO` can be removed.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23339 from 10110346/noneededtodo.
Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SQLConf` is supposed to be serializable. However, currently it is not serializable in `WithTestConf`. `WithTestConf` uses the method `overrideConfs` in closure, while the classes which implements it (`TestHiveSessionStateBuilder` and `TestSQLSessionStateBuilder`) are not serializable.
This PR is to use a local variable to fix it.
## How was this patch tested?
Add unit test.
Closes#23352 from gengliangwang/serializableSQLConf.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when we infer the schema for scala/java decimals, we return as data type the `SYSTEM_DEFAULT` implementation, ie. the decimal type with precision 38 and scale 18. But this is not right, as we know nothing about the right precision and scale and these values can be not enough to store the data. This problem arises in particular with UDF, where we cast all the input of type `DecimalType` to a `DecimalType(38, 18)`: in case this is not enough, null is returned as input for the UDF.
The PR defines a custom handling for casting to the expected data types for ScalaUDF: the decimal precision and scale is picked from the input, so no casting to different and maybe wrong percision and scale happens.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Closes#23308 from mgaido91/SPARK-26308.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.3.0 and previous versions, Hive CTAS command will convert to use data source to write data into the table when the table is convertible. This behavior is controlled by the configs like HiveUtils.CONVERT_METASTORE_ORC and HiveUtils.CONVERT_METASTORE_PARQUET.
In 2.3.1, we drop this optimization by mistake in the PR [SPARK-22977](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20521/files#r217254430). Since that Hive CTAS command only uses Hive Serde to write data.
This patch adds this optimization back to Hive CTAS command. This patch adds OptimizedCreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand which uses data source to write data.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#22514 from viirya/SPARK-25271-2.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For better test coverage, this pr proposed to use the 4 mixed config sets of `WHOLESTAGE_CODEGEN_ENABLED` and `CODEGEN_FACTORY_MODE` when running `SQLQueryTestSuite`:
1. WHOLESTAGE_CODEGEN_ENABLED=true, CODEGEN_FACTORY_MODE=CODEGEN_ONLY
2. WHOLESTAGE_CODEGEN_ENABLED=false, CODEGEN_FACTORY_MODE=CODEGEN_ONLY
3. WHOLESTAGE_CODEGEN_ENABLED=true, CODEGEN_FACTORY_MODE=NO_CODEGEN
4. WHOLESTAGE_CODEGEN_ENABLED=false, CODEGEN_FACTORY_MODE=NO_CODEGEN
This pr also moved some existing tests into `ExplainSuite` because explain output results are different between codegen and interpreter modes.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23213 from maropu/InterpreterModeTest.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ReplaceExceptWithFilter` we do not consider properly the case in which the condition returns NULL. Indeed, in that case, since negating NULL still returns NULL, so it is not true the assumption that negating the condition returns all the rows which didn't satisfy it, rows returning NULL may not be returned. This happens when constraints inferred by `InferFiltersFromConstraints` are not enough, as it happens with `OR` conditions.
The rule had also problems with non-deterministic conditions: in such a scenario, this rule would change the probability of the output.
The PR fixes these problem by:
- returning False for the condition when it is Null (in this way we do return all the rows which didn't satisfy it);
- avoiding any transformation when the condition is non-deterministic.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Closes#23315 from mgaido91/SPARK-26366.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, SQL configs are not propagated to executors while schema inferring in CSV datasource. For example, changing of `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` does not impact on inferring timestamp types. In the PR, I propose to fix the issue by wrapping schema inferring action using `SQLExecution.withSQLConfPropagated`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added logging to `TimestampFormatter`:
```patch
-object TimestampFormatter {
+object TimestampFormatter extends Logging {
def apply(format: String, timeZone: TimeZone, locale: Locale): TimestampFormatter = {
if (SQLConf.get.legacyTimeParserEnabled) {
+ logError("LegacyFallbackTimestampFormatter is being used")
new LegacyFallbackTimestampFormatter(format, timeZone, locale)
} else {
+ logError("Iso8601TimestampFormatter is being used")
new Iso8601TimestampFormatter(format, timeZone, locale)
}
}
```
and run the command in `spark-shell`:
```shell
$ ./bin/spark-shell --conf spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled=true
```
```scala
scala> Seq("2010|10|10").toDF.repartition(1).write.mode("overwrite").text("/tmp/foo")
scala> spark.read.option("inferSchema", "true").option("header", "false").option("timestampFormat", "yyyy|MM|dd").csv("/tmp/foo").printSchema()
18/12/18 10:47:27 ERROR TimestampFormatter: LegacyFallbackTimestampFormatter is being used
root
|-- _c0: timestamp (nullable = true)
```
Closes#23345 from MaxGekk/csv-schema-infer-propagate-configs.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use foreach instead of misuse of map (for Unit). This could cause some weird errors potentially and it's not a good practice anyway. See also SPARK-16694
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23341 from HyukjinKwon/followup-SPARK-26081.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `JsonInferSchema` class is extended to support `TimestampType` inferring from string fields in JSON input:
- If the `prefersDecimal` option is set to `true`, it tries to infer decimal type from the string field.
- If decimal type inference fails or `prefersDecimal` is disabled, `JsonInferSchema` tries to infer `TimestampType`.
- If timestamp type inference fails, `StringType` is returned as the inferred type.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test suite - `JsonInferSchemaSuite` to check date and timestamp types inferring from JSON using `JsonInferSchema` directly. A few tests were added `JsonSuite` to check type merging and roundtrip tests. This changes was tested by `JsonSuite`, `JsonExpressionsSuite` and `JsonFunctionsSuite` as well.
Closes#23201 from MaxGekk/json-infer-time.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements a new feature - window aggregation Pandas UDF for bounded window.
#### Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14EjeY5z4-NC27-SmIP9CsMPCANeTcvxN44a7SIJtZPc/edit#heading=h.c87w44wcj3wj
#### Example:
```
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
from pyspark.sql.window import Window
df = spark.range(0, 10, 2).toDF('v')
w1 = Window.partitionBy().orderBy('v').rangeBetween(-2, 4)
w2 = Window.partitionBy().orderBy('v').rowsBetween(-2, 2)
pandas_udf('double', PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
def avg(v):
return v.mean()
df.withColumn('v_mean', avg(df['v']).over(w1)).show()
# +---+------+
# | v|v_mean|
# +---+------+
# | 0| 1.0|
# | 2| 2.0|
# | 4| 4.0|
# | 6| 6.0|
# | 8| 7.0|
# +---+------+
df.withColumn('v_mean', avg(df['v']).over(w2)).show()
# +---+------+
# | v|v_mean|
# +---+------+
# | 0| 2.0|
# | 2| 3.0|
# | 4| 4.0|
# | 6| 5.0|
# | 8| 6.0|
# +---+------+
```
#### High level changes:
This PR modifies the existing WindowInPandasExec physical node to deal with unbounded (growing, shrinking and sliding) windows.
* `WindowInPandasExec` now share the same base class as `WindowExec` and share utility functions. See `WindowExecBase`
* `WindowFunctionFrame` now has two new functions `currentLowerBound` and `currentUpperBound` - to return the lower and upper window bound for the current output row. It is also modified to allow `AggregateProcessor` == null. Null aggregator processor is used for `WindowInPandasExec` where we don't have an aggregator and only uses lower and upper bound functions from `WindowFunctionFrame`
* The biggest change is in `WindowInPandasExec`, where it is modified to take `currentLowerBound` and `currentUpperBound` and write those values together with the input data to the python process for rolling window aggregation. See `WindowInPandasExec` for more details.
#### Discussion
In benchmarking, I found numpy variant of the rolling window UDF is much faster than the pandas version:
Spark SQL window function: 20s
Pandas variant: ~80s
Numpy variant: 10s
Numpy variant with numba: 4s
Allowing numpy variant of the vectorized UDFs is something I want to discuss because of the performance improvement, but doesn't have to be in this PR.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests
Closes#22305 from icexelloss/SPARK-24561-bounded-window-udf.
Authored-by: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SinkProgress should report similar properties like SourceProgress as long as they are available for given Sink. Count of written rows is metric availble for all Sinks. Since relevant progress information is with respect to commited rows, ideal object to carry this info is WriterCommitMessage. For brevity the implementation will focus only on Sinks with API V2 and on Micro Batch mode. Implemention for Continuous mode will be provided at later date.
### Before
```
{"description":"org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaSourceProvider3c0bd317"}
```
### After
```
{"description":"org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaSourceProvider3c0bd317","numOutputRows":5000}
```
### This PR is related to:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24647
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21313
## How was this patch tested?
Existing and new unit tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#21919 from vackosar/feature/SPARK-24933-numOutputRows.
Lead-authored-by: Vaclav Kosar <admin@vaclavkosar.com>
Co-authored-by: Kosar, Vaclav: Functions Transformation <Vaclav.Kosar@barclayscapital.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up of the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899. It is to add the rule TransposeWindow the optimizer batch.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#23222 from gatorsmile/followupSPARK-20636.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- The original comment about `updateDriverMetrics` is not right.
- Refactor the code to ensure `selectedPartitions ` has been set before sending the driver-side metrics.
- Restore the original name, which is more general and extendable.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#23328 from gatorsmile/followupSpark-26142.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The optimizer rule `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin` performs join reordering on inner joins. This was introduced from SPARK-12032 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073) in 2015-12.
After it had reordered the joins, though, it didn't check whether or not the output attribute order is still the same as before. Thus, it's possible to have a mismatch between the reordered output attributes order vs the schema that a DataFrame thinks it has.
The same problem exists in the CBO version of join reordering (`CostBasedJoinReorder`) too.
This can be demonstrated with the example:
```scala
spark.sql("create table table_a (x int, y int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_b (i int, j int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_c (a int, b int) using parquet")
val df = spark.sql("""
with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b)
select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i
""")
```
here's what the DataFrame thinks:
```
scala> df.printSchema
root
|-- x: integer (nullable = true)
|-- y: integer (nullable = true)
|-- i: integer (nullable = true)
|-- j: integer (nullable = true)
|-- a: integer (nullable = true)
|-- b: integer (nullable = true)
```
here's what the optimized plan thinks, after join reordering:
```
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
```
If we exclude the `ReorderJoin` rule (using Spark 2.4's optimizer rule exclusion feature), it's back to normal:
```
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules", "org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin")
scala> val df = spark.sql("with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b) select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [x: int, y: int ... 4 more fields]
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
```
Note that this output attribute ordering problem leads to data corruption, and can manifest itself in various symptoms:
* Silently corrupting data, if the reordered columns happen to either have matching types or have sufficiently-compatible types (e.g. all fixed length primitive types are considered as "sufficiently compatible" in an `UnsafeRow`), then only the resulting data is going to be wrong but it might not trigger any alarms immediately. Or
* Weird Java-level exceptions like `java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException`, or even SIGSEGVs.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit test in `JoinReorderSuite` and new end-to-end test in `JoinSuite`.
Also made `JoinReorderSuite` and `StarJoinReorderSuite` assert more strongly on maintaining output attribute order.
Closes#23303 from rednaxelafx/fix-join-reorder.
Authored-by: Kris Mok <rednaxelafx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
CSV parsing accidentally uses the previous good value for a bad input field. See example in Jira.
This PR ensures that the associated column is set to null when an input field cannot be converted.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test.
Ran all SQL unit tests (testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.*).
Ran pyspark tests for pyspark-sql
Closes#23323 from bersprockets/csv-bad-field.
Authored-by: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there is a self-join as result of a IN subquery, the join condition may be invalid, resulting in trivially true predicates and return wrong results.
The PR deduplicates the subquery output in order to avoid the issue.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#23057 from mgaido91/SPARK-26078.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch on **java.time API** for parsing timestamps and dates from JSON inputs with microseconds precision. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` allow to switch back to previous behavior with using `java.text.SimpleDateFormat`/`FastDateFormat` for parsing/generating timestamps/dates.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `JsonExpressionsSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonSuite`.
Closes#23196 from MaxGekk/json-time-parser.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Multiple SparkContexts are discouraged and it has been warning for last 4 years, see SPARK-4180. It could cause arbitrary and mysterious error cases, see SPARK-2243.
Honestly, I didn't even know Spark still allows it, which looks never officially supported, see SPARK-2243.
I believe It should be good timing now to remove this configuration.
## How was this patch tested?
Each doc was manually checked and manually tested:
```
$ ./bin/spark-shell --conf=spark.driver.allowMultipleContexts=true
...
scala> new SparkContext()
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Only one SparkContext should be running in this JVM (see SPARK-2243).The currently running SparkContext was created at:
org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$Builder.getOrCreate(SparkSession.scala:939)
...
org.apache.spark.SparkContext$.$anonfun$assertNoOtherContextIsRunning$2(SparkContext.scala:2435)
at scala.Option.foreach(Option.scala:274)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$.assertNoOtherContextIsRunning(SparkContext.scala:2432)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$.markPartiallyConstructed(SparkContext.scala:2509)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.<init>(SparkContext.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.<init>(SparkContext.scala:112)
... 49 elided
```
Closes#23311 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26362.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When using a higher-order function with the same variable name as the existing columns in `Filter` or something which uses `Analyzer.resolveExpressionBottomUp` during the resolution, e.g.,:
```scala
val df = Seq(
(Seq(1, 9, 8, 7), 1, 2),
(Seq(5, 9, 7), 2, 2),
(Seq.empty, 3, 2),
(null, 4, 2)
).toDF("i", "x", "d")
checkAnswer(df.filter("exists(i, x -> x % d == 0)"),
Seq(Row(Seq(1, 9, 8, 7), 1, 2)))
checkAnswer(df.select("x").filter("exists(i, x -> x % d == 0)"),
Seq(Row(1)))
```
the following exception happens:
```
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BoundReference cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.NamedExpression
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:62)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach$(ResizableArray.scala:55)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:49)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.$anonfun$functionsForEval$1(higherOrderFunctions.scala:147)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.functionsForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:145)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.functionsForEval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:145)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionsForEval$lzycompute(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionsForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.functionForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.functionForEval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.nullSafeEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.eval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.eval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:185)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.eval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificPredicate.eval(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.$anonfun$doExecute$3(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:216)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.$anonfun$doExecute$3$adapted(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:215)
...
```
because the `UnresolvedAttribute`s in `LambdaFunction` are unexpectedly resolved by the rule.
This pr modified to use a placeholder `UnresolvedNamedLambdaVariable` to prevent unexpected resolution.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test and modified some tests.
Closes#23320 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26370/hof_resolution.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I was looking at the code and it was a bit difficult to see the life cycle of InMemoryFileIndex passed into getOrInferFileFormatSchema, because once it is passed in, and another time it was created in getOrInferFileFormatSchema. It'd be easier to understand the life cycle if we move the creation of it out.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a simple code move and should be covered by existing tests.
Closes#23317 from rxin/SPARK-26368.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Regarding the performance issue of SPARK-26155, it reports the issue on TPC-DS. I think it is better to add a benchmark for `LongToUnsafeRowMap` which is the root cause of performance regression.
It can be easier to show performance difference between different metric implementations in `LongToUnsafeRowMap`.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually run added benchmark.
Closes#23284 from viirya/SPARK-26337.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added query status updates to ContinuousExecution.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + added ContinuousQueryStatusAndProgressSuite.
Closes#23095 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-23886.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As discussed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23208/files#r239684490 , we should put `newScanBuilder` in read related mix-in traits like `SupportsBatchRead`, to support write-only table.
In the `Append` operator, we should skip schema validation if not necessary. In the future we would introduce a capability API, so that data source can tell Spark that it doesn't want to do validation.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Closes#23266 from cloud-fan/ds-read.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up pr for #23207, include following changes:
- Rename `SQLShuffleMetricsReporter` to `SQLShuffleReadMetricsReporter` to make it match with write side naming.
- Display text changes for read side for naming consistent.
- Rename function in `ShuffleWriteProcessor`.
- Delete `private[spark]` in execution package.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23286 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-26193-follow.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If `checkForContinuous` is called ( `checkForStreaming` is called in `checkForContinuous` ), the `checkForStreaming` mothod will be called twice in `createQuery` , this is not necessary, and the `checkForStreaming` method has a lot of statements, so it's better to remove one of them.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests in `StreamingQueryManagerSuite` and `ContinuousAggregationSuite`
Closes#23251 from 10110346/isUnsupportedOperationCheckEnabled.
Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to return partial results from JSON datasource and JSON functions in the PERMISSIVE mode if some of JSON fields are parsed and converted to desired types successfully. The changes are made only for `StructType`. Whole bad JSON records are placed into the corrupt column specified by the `columnNameOfCorruptRecord` option or SQL config.
Partial results are not returned for malformed JSON input.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new UT which checks converting JSON strings with one invalid and one valid field at the end of the string.
Closes#23253 from MaxGekk/json-bad-record.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a regression introduced by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104 at Spark 2.4.0.
When we have Python UDF in subquery, we will hit an exception
```
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.AttributeReference cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.PythonUDF
at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.map(Stream.scala:414)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.EvalPythonExec.$anonfun$doExecute$2(EvalPythonExec.scala:98)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitions$2(RDD.scala:815)
...
```
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104 turned `ExtractPythonUDFs` from a physical rule to optimizer rule. However, there is a difference between a physical rule and optimizer rule. A physical rule always runs once, an optimizer rule may be applied twice on a query tree even the rule is located in a batch that only runs once.
For a subquery, the `OptimizeSubqueries` rule will execute the entire optimizer on the query plan inside subquery. Later on subquery will be turned to joins, and the optimizer rules will be applied to it again.
Unfortunately, the `ExtractPythonUDFs` rule is not idempotent. When it's applied twice on a query plan inside subquery, it will produce a malformed plan. It extracts Python UDF from Python exec plans.
This PR proposes 2 changes to be double safe:
1. `ExtractPythonUDFs` should skip python exec plans, to make the rule idempotent
2. `ExtractPythonUDFs` should skip subquery
## How was this patch tested?
a new test.
Closes#23248 from cloud-fan/python.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`RDDConversions` would get disproportionately slower as the number of columns in the query increased,
for the type of `converters` before is `scala.collection.immutable.::` which is a subtype of list.
This PR removing `RDDConversions` and using `RowEncoder` to convert the Row to InternalRow.
The test of `PrunedScanSuite` for 2000 columns and 20k rows takes 409 seconds before this PR, and 361 seconds after.
## How was this patch tested?
Test case of `PrunedScanSuite`
Closes#23262 from eatoncys/toarray.
Authored-by: 10129659 <chen.yanshan@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
… incorrect.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the reported heartbeat information, the unit of the memory data is bytes, which is converted by the formatBytes() function in the utils.js file before being displayed in the interface. The cardinality of the unit conversion in the formatBytes function is 1000, which should be 1024.
Change the cardinality of the unit conversion in the formatBytes function to 1024.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22683 from httfighter/SPARK-25696.
Lead-authored-by: 韩田田00222924 <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Co-authored-by: han.tiantian@zte.com.cn <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Implement `SQLShuffleWriteMetricsReporter` on the SQL side as the customized `ShuffleWriteMetricsReporter`.
2. Add shuffle write metrics to `ShuffleExchangeExec`, and use these metrics to create corresponding `SQLShuffleWriteMetricsReporter` in shuffle dependency.
3. Rework on `ShuffleMapTask` to add new class named `ShuffleWriteProcessor` which control shuffle write process, we use sql shuffle write metrics by customizing a ShuffleWriteProcessor on SQL side.
## How was this patch tested?
Add UT in SQLMetricsSuite.
Manually test locally, update screen shot to document attached in JIRA.
Closes#23207 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-26193.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
There are 4 places we need to deal with NaN and -0.0:
1. comparison expressions. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
2. Join keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
3. grouping keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be assigned to the same group. Different NaNs should be assigned to the same group.
4. window partition keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
The case 1 is OK. Our comparison already handles NaN and -0.0, and for struct/array/map, we will recursively compare the fields/elements.
Case 2, 3 and 4 are problematic, as they compare `UnsafeRow` binary directly, and different NaNs have different binary representation, and the same thing happens for -0.0 and 0.0.
To fix it, a simple solution is: normalize float/double when building unsafe data (`UnsafeRow`, `UnsafeArrayData`, `UnsafeMapData`). Then we don't need to worry about it anymore.
Following this direction, this PR moves the handling of NaN and -0.0 from `Platform` to `UnsafeWriter`, so that places like `UnsafeRow.setFloat` will not handle them, which reduces the perf overhead. It's also easier to add comments explaining why we do it in `UnsafeWriter`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23239 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Parquet files appear to have nullability info when being written, not being read.
## How was this patch tested?
Some test code: (running spark 2.3, but the relevant code in DataSource looks identical on master)
case class NullTest(bo: Boolean, opbol: Option[Boolean])
val testDf = spark.createDataFrame(Seq(NullTest(true, Some(false))))
defined class NullTest
testDf: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [bo: boolean, opbol: boolean]
testDf.write.parquet("s3://asana-stats/tmp_dima/parquet_check_schema")
spark.read.parquet("s3://asana-stats/tmp_dima/parquet_check_schema/part-00000-b1bf4a19-d9fe-4ece-a2b4-9bbceb490857-c000.snappy.parquet4").printSchema()
root
|-- bo: boolean (nullable = true)
|-- opbol: boolean (nullable = true)
Meanwhile, the parquet file formed does have nullable info:
[]batchprod-report000:/tmp/dimakamalov-batch$ aws s3 ls s3://asana-stats/tmp_dima/parquet_check_schema/
2018-10-17 21:03:52 0 _SUCCESS
2018-10-17 21:03:50 504 part-00000-b1bf4a19-d9fe-4ece-a2b4-9bbceb490857-c000.snappy.parquet
[]batchprod-report000:/tmp/dimakamalov-batch$ aws s3 cp s3://asana-stats/tmp_dima/parquet_check_schema/part-00000-b1bf4a19-d9fe-4ece-a2b4-9bbceb490857-c000.snappy.parquet .
download: s3://asana-stats/tmp_dima/parquet_check_schema/part-00000-b1bf4a19-d9fe-4ece-a2b4-9bbceb490857-c000.snappy.parquet to ./part-00000-b1bf4a19-d9fe-4ece-a2b4-9bbceb490857-c000.snappy.parquet
[]batchprod-report000:/tmp/dimakamalov-batch$ java -jar parquet-tools-1.8.2.jar schema part-00000-b1bf4a19-d9fe-4ece-a2b4-9bbceb490857-c000.snappy.parquet
message spark_schema {
required boolean bo;
optional boolean opbol;
}
Closes#22759 from dima-asana/dima-asana-nullable-parquet-doc.
Authored-by: dima-asana <42555784+dima-asana@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
