Commit graph

10378 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gabor Somogyi e5bb2937f6 [SPARK-32032][SS] Avoid infinite wait in driver because of KafkaConsumer.poll(long) API
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecated `KafkaConsumer.poll(long)` API calls may cause infinite wait in the driver. In this PR I've added a new `AdminClient` based offset fetching which is turned off by default. There is a new flag named `spark.sql.streaming.kafka.useDeprecatedOffsetFetching` (default: `true`) which can be set to `false` to reach the newly added functionality. The Structured Streaming migration guide contains more information what migration consideration must be done. Please see the following [doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gAh0pKgZUgyqO2Re3sAy-fdYpe_SxpJ6DkeXE8R1P7E/edit?usp=sharing) for further details.

The PR contains the following changes:
* Added `AdminClient` based offset fetching
* GroupId prefix feature removed from driver but only in `AdminClient` based approach (`AdminClient` doesn't need any GroupId)
* GroupId override feature removed from driver but only in `AdminClient` based approach  (`AdminClient` doesn't need any GroupId)
* Additional unit tests
* Code comment changes
* Minor bugfixes here and there
* Removed Kafka auto topic creation feature but only in `AdminClient` based approach (please see doc for rationale). In short, it's super hidden, not sure anybody ever used in production + error prone.
* Added documentation to `ss-migration-guide` and `structured-streaming-kafka-integration`

### Why are the changes needed?
Driver may hang forever.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing + additional unit tests.
Cluster test with simple Kafka topic to another topic query.
Documentation:
```
cd docs/
SKIP_API=1 jekyll build
```
Manual webpage check.

Closes #29729 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-32032.

Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-12-01 20:34:00 +09:00
zky.zhoukeyong 1034815519 [SPARK-33572][SQL] Datetime building should fail if the year, month, ..., second combination is invalid
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Datetime building should fail if the year, month, ..., second combination is invalid, when ANSI mode is enabled. This patch should update MakeDate, MakeTimestamp and MakeInterval.

### Why are the changes needed?
For ANSI mode.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Added UT and Existing UT.

Closes #30516 from waitinfuture/SPARK-33498.

Lead-authored-by: zky.zhoukeyong <zky.zhoukeyong@alibaba-inc.com>
Co-authored-by: waitinfuture <waitinfuture@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-12-01 11:07:16 +00:00
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 52e5cc46bc [SPARK-27188][SS] FileStreamSink: provide a new option to have retention on output files
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch proposes to provide a new option to specify time-to-live (TTL) for output file entries in FileStreamSink. TTL is defined via current timestamp - the last modified time for the file.

This patch will filter out outdated output files in metadata while compacting batches (other batches don't have functionality to clean entries), which helps metadata to not grow linearly, as well as filtered out files will be "eventually" no longer seen in reader queries which leverage File(Stream)Source.

### Why are the changes needed?

The metadata log greatly helps to easily achieve exactly-once but given the output path is open to arbitrary readers, there's no way to compact the metadata log, which ends up growing the metadata file as query runs for long time, especially for compacted batch.

Lots of end users have been reporting the issue: see comments in [SPARK-24295](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24295) and [SPARK-29995](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29995), and [SPARK-30462](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30462).
(There're some reports from end users which include their workarounds: SPARK-24295)

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, as the configuration is new and by default it is not applied.

### How was this patch tested?

New UT.

Closes #28363 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-27188-v2.

Lead-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-12-01 14:42:48 +09:00
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2af2da5a4b [SPARK-30900][SS] FileStreamSource: Avoid reading compact metadata log twice if the query restarts from compact batch
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch addresses the case where compact metadata file is read twice in FileStreamSource during restarting query.

When restarting the query, there is a case which the query starts from compaction batch, and the batch has source metadata file to read. One case is that the previous query succeeded to read from inputs, but not finalized the batch for various reasons.

The patch finds the latest compaction batch when restoring from metadata log, and put entries for the batch into the file entry cache which would avoid reading compact batch file twice.

FileStreamSourceLog doesn't know about offset / commit metadata in checkpoint so doesn't know which exactly batch to start from, but in practice, only couple of latest batches are candidates to
be started from when restarting query. This patch leverages the fact to skip calculation if possible.

### Why are the changes needed?

Spark incurs unnecessary cost on reading the compact metadata file twice on some case, which may not be ignorable when the query has been processed huge number of files so far.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

New UT.

Closes #27649 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-30900.

Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-12-01 13:11:14 +09:00
Kousuke Saruta c50fcac00e [SPARK-33607][SS][WEBUI] Input Rate timeline/histogram aren't rendered if built with Scala 2.13
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes an issue that the histogram and timeline aren't rendered in the `Streaming Query Statistics` page if we built Spark with Scala 2.13.

![before-fix-the-issue](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4736016/100612855-f543d700-3356-11eb-90d9-ede57b8b3f4f.png)
![NaN_Error](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4736016/100612879-00970280-3357-11eb-97cf-43978bbe2d3a.png)

The reason is [`maxRecordRate` can be `NaN`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/ui/StreamingQueryStatisticsPage.scala#L371) for Scala 2.13.

The `NaN` is the result of [`query.recentProgress.map(_.inputRowsPerSecond).max`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/ui/StreamingQueryStatisticsPage.scala#L372) when the first element of `query.recentProgress.map(_.inputRowsPerSecond)` is `NaN`.
Actually, the comparison logic for `Double` type was changed in Scala 2.13.
https://github.com/scala/bug/issues/12107
https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/6410

So this issue happens as of Scala 2.13.

The root cause of the `NaN` is [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ProgressReporter.scala#L164).
This `NaN` seems to be an initial value of `inputTimeSec` so I think `Double.PositiveInfinity` is suitable rather than `NaN` and this change can resolve this issue.

### Why are the changes needed?

To make sure we can use the histogram/timeline with Scala 2.13.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

First, I built with the following commands.
```
$ /dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.13
$ build/sbt -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pscala-2.13 package
```

Then, ran the following query (this is brought from #30427 ).
```
import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.Trigger
val query = spark
  .readStream
  .format("rate")
  .option("rowsPerSecond", 1000)
  .option("rampUpTime", "10s")
  .load()
  .selectExpr("*", "CAST(CAST(timestamp AS BIGINT) - CAST((RAND() * 100000) AS BIGINT) AS TIMESTAMP) AS tsMod")
  .selectExpr("tsMod", "mod(value, 100) as mod", "value")
  .withWatermark("tsMod", "10 seconds")
  .groupBy(window($"tsMod", "1 minute", "10 seconds"), $"mod")
  .agg(max("value").as("max_value"), min("value").as("min_value"), avg("value").as("avg_value"))
  .writeStream
  .format("console")
  .trigger(Trigger.ProcessingTime("5 seconds"))
  .outputMode("append")
  .start()
```

Finally, I confirmed that the timeline and histogram are rendered.
![after-fix-the-issue](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4736016/100612736-c9285600-3356-11eb-856d-7e53cc656c36.png)

```

Closes #30546 from sarutak/ss-nan.

Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-12-01 11:45:32 +09:00
Max Gekk 030b3139da [SPARK-33569][SPARK-33452][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix a build error in ShowPartitionsExec
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use `listPartitionIdentifiers ` instead of `listPartitionByNames` in `ShowPartitionsExec`. The `listPartitionByNames` was renamed by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30514.

### Why are the changes needed?
To fix build error.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running tests for the `SHOW PARTITIONS` command:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *ShowPartitionsSuite"
```

Closes #30553 from MaxGekk/fix-build-show-partitions-exec.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 16:40:36 +00:00
Max Gekk 6fd148fea8 [SPARK-33569][SQL] Remove getting partitions by an identifier prefix
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Remove the method `listPartitionIdentifiers()` from the `SupportsPartitionManagement` interface. The method lists partitions by ident prefix.
2. Rename `listPartitionByNames()` to `listPartitionIdentifiers()`.
3. Re-implement the default method `partitionExists()` using new method.

### Why are the changes needed?
Getting partitions by ident prefix only is not used, and it can be removed to improve code maintenance. Also this makes the `SupportsPartitionManagement` interface cleaner.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Should not.

### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suites:
```
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.connector.catalog.*"
```

Closes #30514 from MaxGekk/remove-listPartitionIdentifiers.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 14:05:49 +00:00
Max Gekk 0a612b6a40 [SPARK-33452][SQL] Support v2 SHOW PARTITIONS
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Remove V2 logical node `ShowPartitionsStatement `, and replace it by V2 `ShowPartitions`.
2. Implement V2 execution node `ShowPartitionsExec` similar to V1 `ShowPartitionsCommand`.

### Why are the changes needed?
To have feature parity with Datasource V1.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.

Before the change, `SHOW PARTITIONS` fails in V2 table catalogs with the exception:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: SHOW PARTITIONS is only supported with v1 tables.
   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveSessionCatalog.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$analysis$ResolveSessionCatalog$$parseV1Table(ResolveSessionCatalog.scala:628)
   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveSessionCatalog$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(ResolveSessionCatalog.scala:466)
```

### How was this patch tested?
By running the following test suites:
1. Modified `ShowPartitionsParserSuite` where `ShowPartitionsStatement` is replaced by V2 `ShowPartitions`.
2. `v2.ShowPartitionsSuite`

Closes #30398 from MaxGekk/show-partitions-exec-v2.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 13:45:53 +00:00
Wenchen Fan 5cfbdddefe [SPARK-33480][SQL] Support char/varchar type
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR adds the char/varchar type which is kind of a variant of string type:
1. Char type is fixed-length string. When comparing char type values, we need to pad the shorter one to the longer length.
2. Varchar type is string with a length limitation.

To implement the char/varchar semantic, this PR:
1. Do string length check when writing to char/varchar type columns.
2. Do string padding when reading char type columns. We don't do it at the writing side to save storage space.
3. Do string padding when comparing char type column with string literal or another char type column. (string literal is fixed length so should be treated as char type as well)

To simplify the implementation, this PR doesn't propagate char/varchar type info through functions/operators(e.g. `substring`). That said, a column can only be char/varchar type if it's a table column, not a derived column like `SELECT substring(col)`.

To be safe, this PR doesn't add char/varchar type to the query engine(expression input check, internal row framework, codegen framework, etc.). We will replace char/varchar type by string type with metadata (`Attribute.metadata` or `StructField.metadata`) that includes the original type string before it goes into the query engine. That said, the existing code will not see char/varchar type but only string type.

char/varchar type may come from several places:
1. v1 table from hive catalog.
2. v2 table from v2 catalog.
3. user-specified schema in `spark.read.schema` and `spark.readStream.schema`
4. `Column.cast`
5. schema string in places like `from_json`, pandas UDF, etc. These places use SQL parser which replaces char/varchar with string already, even before this PR.

This PR covers all the above cases, implements the length check and padding feature by looking at string type with special metadata.

### Why are the changes needed?

char and varchar are standard SQL types. varchar is widely used in other databases instead of string type.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

For hive tables: now the table insertion fails if the value exceeds char/varchar length. Previously we truncate the value silently.

For other tables:
1. now char type is allowed.
2. now we have length check when inserting to varchar columns. Previously we write the value as it is.

### How was this patch tested?

new tests

Closes #30412 from cloud-fan/char.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 09:23:05 +00:00
gengjiaan b665d58819 [SPARK-28646][SQL] Fix bug of Count so as consistent with mainstream databases
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Spark allows calls to `count` even for non parameterless aggregate function. For example, the following query actually works:
`SELECT count() FROM tenk1;`
On the other hand, mainstream databases will throw an error.
**Oracle**
`> ORA-00909: invalid number of arguments`
**PgSQL**
`ERROR:  count(*) must be used to call a parameterless aggregate function`
**MySQL**
`> 1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')`

### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a bug so that consistent with mainstream databases.
There is an example query output with/without this fix.
`SELECT count() FROM testData;`
The output before this fix:
`0`
The output after this fix:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
cannot resolve 'count()' due to data type mismatch: count requires at least one argument.; line 1 pos 7
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
If not specify parameter for `count`, will throw an error.

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.

Closes #30541 from beliefer/SPARK-28646.

Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-30 17:04:38 +09:00
xuewei.linxuewei 225c2e2815 [SPARK-33498][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Deduplicate the unittest by using checkCastWithParseError
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Dup code removed in SPARK-33498 as follow-up.

### Why are the changes needed?

Nit.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

Closes #30540 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33498.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-30 15:36:26 +09:00
Terry Kim 0fd9f57dd4 [SPARK-33448][SQL] Support CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE commands for v2 tables
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to support `CHACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` commands for v2 tables.

In addtion, this PR proposes to migrate `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).

### Why are the changes needed?

To support `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` commands for v2 tables.

Note that `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` for v1 tables/views go through `SparkSession.table` to resolve identifier, which resolves temp views first, so there is no change in the behavior by moving to the new framework.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes. Now the user can run `CACHE/UNCACHE TABLE` commands on v2 tables.

### How was this patch tested?

Added/updated existing tests.

Closes #30403 from imback82/cache_table.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 05:37:10 +00:00
Kent Yao 2da72593c1 [SPARK-32976][SQL] Support column list in INSERT statement
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

#### JIRA expectations
```
   INSERT currently does not support named column lists.

   INSERT INTO <table> (col1, col2,…) VALUES( 'val1', 'val2', … )
   Note, we assume the column list contains all the column names. Issue an exception if the list is not complete. The column order could be different from the column order defined in the table definition.
```
#### implemetations
In this PR, we add a column list  as an optional part to the `INSERT OVERWRITE/INTO` statements:
```
  /**
   * {{{
   *   INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE tableIdentifier [partitionSpec [IF NOT EXISTS]]? [identifierList] ...
   *   INSERT INTO [TABLE] tableIdentifier [partitionSpec]  [identifierList] ...
   * }}}
   */
```
The column list represents all expected columns with an explicit order that you want to insert to the target table. **Particularly**,  we assume the column list contains all the column names in the current implementation, it will fail when the list is incomplete.

In **Analyzer**, we add a code path to resolve the column list in the `ResolveOutputRelation` rule before it is transformed to v1 or v2 command. It will fail here if the list has any field that not belongs to the target table.

Then, for v2 command, e.g. `AppendData`, we use the resolved column list and output of the target table to resolve the output of the source query `ResolveOutputRelation` rule. If the list has duplicated columns, we fail. If the list is not empty but the list size does not match the target table, we fail. If no other exceptions occur, we use the column list to map the output of the source query to the output of the target table.  The column list will be set to Nil and it will not hit the rule again after it is resolved.

for v1 command, those all happen in the `PreprocessTableInsertion` rule

### Why are the changes needed?
 new feature support

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

yes, insert into/overwrite table support specify column list
### How was this patch tested?

new tests

Closes #29893 from yaooqinn/SPARK-32976.

Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 05:23:23 +00:00
Chao Sun feda7299e3 [SPARK-33567][SQL] DSv2: Use callback instead of passing Spark session and v2 relation for refreshing cache
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This replaces Spark session and `DataSourceV2Relation` in V2 write plans by replacing them with a callback `afterWrite`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Per discussion in #30429, it's better to not pass Spark session and `DataSourceV2Relation` through Spark plans. Instead we can use a callback which makes the interface cleaner.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

N/A

Closes #30491 from sunchao/SPARK-33492-followup.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-30 04:50:50 +00:00
Yuming Wang a5e13acd19 [SPARK-33582][SQL] Hive Metastore support filter by not-equals
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr make partition predicate pushdown into Hive metastore support not-equals operator.

Hive related changes:
b8bd4594be/itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/TestHiveMetaStore.java (L2194-L2207)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2702

### Why are the changes needed?

Improve query performance.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30534 from wangyum/SPARK-33582.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-30 11:24:15 +09:00
Yuming Wang f93d4395b2 [SPARK-33589][SQL] Close opened session if the initialization fails
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr add try catch when opening session.

### Why are the changes needed?

Close opened session if the initialization fails.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual test.

Before this pr:

```
[rootspark-3267648 spark]#  bin/beeline -u jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/db_not_exist
NOTE: SPARK_PREPEND_CLASSES is set, placing locally compiled Spark classes ahead of assembly.
Connecting to jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/db_not_exist
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.hive.jdbc.Utils).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
Error: Could not open client transport with JDBC Uri: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/db_not_exist: Database 'db_not_exist' not found; (state=08S01,code=0)
Beeline version 2.3.7 by Apache Hive
beeline>
```
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5399861/100560975-73ba5d80-32f2-11eb-8f92-b2509e7a121f.png)

After this pr:
```
[rootspark-3267648 spark]#  bin/beeline -u jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/db_not_exist
NOTE: SPARK_PREPEND_CLASSES is set, placing locally compiled Spark classes ahead of assembly.
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
Connecting to jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/db_not_exist
Error: Could not open client transport with JDBC Uri: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/db_not_exist: Failed to open new session: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.NoSuchDatabaseException: Database 'db_not_exist' not found; (state=08S01,code=0)
Beeline version 2.3.7 by Apache Hive
beeline>
```
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5399861/100560917-479edc80-32f2-11eb-986f-7a997f1163fc.png)

Closes #30536 from wangyum/SPARK-33589.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-30 11:21:02 +09:00
Max Gekk a088a801ed
[SPARK-33585][SQL][DOCS] Fix the comment for SQLContext.tables() and mention the database column
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change the comments for `SQLContext.tables()` to "The returned DataFrame has three columns, database, tableName and isTemporary".

### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the comment mentions only 2 columns but `tables()` returns 3 columns actually:
```scala
scala> spark.range(10).createOrReplaceTempView("view1")
scala> val tables = spark.sqlContext.tables()
tables: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [database: string, tableName: string ... 1 more field]

scala> tables.printSchema
root
 |-- database: string (nullable = false)
 |-- tableName: string (nullable = false)
 |-- isTemporary: boolean (nullable = false)

scala> tables.show
+--------+---------+-----------+
|database|tableName|isTemporary|
+--------+---------+-----------+
| default|       t1|      false|
| default|       t2|      false|
| default|      ymd|      false|
|        |    view1|       true|
+--------+---------+-----------+
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running `./dev/scalastyle`

Closes #30526 from MaxGekk/sqlcontext-tables-doc.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-29 12:18:07 -08:00
Max Gekk 0054fc937f
[SPARK-33588][SQL] Respect the spark.sql.caseSensitive config while resolving partition spec in v1 SHOW TABLE EXTENDED
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Perform partition spec normalization in `ShowTablesCommand` according to the table schema before getting partitions from the catalog. The normalization via `PartitioningUtils.normalizePartitionSpec()` adjusts the column names in partition specification, w.r.t. the real partition column names and case sensitivity.

### Why are the changes needed?
Even when `spark.sql.caseSensitive` is `false` which is the default value, v1 `SHOW TABLE EXTENDED` is case sensitive:
```sql
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE tbl1 (price int, qty int, year int, month int)
         > USING parquet
         > partitioned by (year, month);
spark-sql> INSERT INTO tbl1 PARTITION(year = 2015, month = 1) SELECT 1, 1;
spark-sql> SHOW TABLE EXTENDED LIKE 'tbl1' PARTITION(YEAR = 2015, Month = 1);
Error in query: Partition spec is invalid. The spec (YEAR, Month) must match the partition spec (year, month) defined in table '`default`.`tbl1`';
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the `SHOW TABLE EXTENDED` command respects the SQL config. And for example above, it returns correct result:
```sql
spark-sql> SHOW TABLE EXTENDED LIKE 'tbl1' PARTITION(YEAR = 2015, Month = 1);
default	tbl1	false	Partition Values: [year=2015, month=1]
Location: file:/Users/maximgekk/spark-warehouse/tbl1/year=2015/month=1
Serde Library: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.parquet.serde.ParquetHiveSerDe
InputFormat: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.parquet.MapredParquetInputFormat
OutputFormat: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.parquet.MapredParquetOutputFormat
Storage Properties: [serialization.format=1, path=file:/Users/maximgekk/spark-warehouse/tbl1]
Partition Parameters: {transient_lastDdlTime=1606595118, totalSize=623, numFiles=1}
Created Time: Sat Nov 28 23:25:18 MSK 2020
Last Access: UNKNOWN
Partition Statistics: 623 bytes
```

### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suite `v1/ShowTablesSuite`

Closes #30529 from MaxGekk/show-table-case-sensitive-spec.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-29 12:10:16 -08:00
Yuming Wang ba178f852f [SPARK-33581][SQL][TEST] Refactor HivePartitionFilteringSuite
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr refactor HivePartitionFilteringSuite.

### Why are the changes needed?

To make it easy to maintain.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

N/A

Closes #30525 from wangyum/SPARK-33581.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
2020-11-29 09:36:55 +08:00
Max Gekk bfe9380ba2
[MINOR][SQL] Remove getTables() from r.SQLUtils
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the unused method `getTables()` from `r.SQLUtils`. The method was used before the changes https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483 but R's `tables.default` was rewritten using `listTables()`: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483/files#diff-2c01472a7bcb1d318244afcd621d726e00d36cd15dffe7e44fa96c54fce4cd9aR220-R223

### Why are the changes needed?
To improve code maintenance, and remove the dead code.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By R tests.

Closes #30527 from MaxGekk/remove-getTables-in-r-SQLUtils.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-28 16:58:40 -08:00
luluorta 35ded12fc6 [SPARK-33141][SQL] Capture SQL configs when creating permanent views
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes CreateViewCommand/AlterViewAsCommand capturing runtime SQL configs and store them as view properties. These configs will be applied during the parsing and analysis phases of the view resolution. Users can set `spark.sql.legacy.useCurrentConfigsForView` to `true` to restore the behavior before.

### Why are the changes needed?
This PR is a sub-task of [SPARK-33138](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33138) that proposes to unify temp view and permanent view behaviors. This PR makes permanent views mimicking the temp view behavior that "fixes" view semantic by directly storing resolved LogicalPlan. For example, if a user uses spark 2.4 to create a view that contains null values from division-by-zero expressions, she may not want that other users' queries which reference her view throw exceptions when running on spark 3.x with ansi mode on.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
added UT + existing UTs (improved)

Closes #30289 from luluorta/SPARK-33141.

Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-27 13:32:25 +00:00
xuewei.linxuewei b9f2f78de5 [SPARK-33498][SQL] Datetime parsing should fail if the input string can't be parsed, or the pattern string is invalid
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Datetime parsing should fail if the input string can't be parsed, or the pattern string is invalid, when ANSI mode is enable. This patch should update GetTimeStamp, UnixTimeStamp, ToUnixTimeStamp and Cast.

### Why are the changes needed?

For ANSI mode.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Added UT and Existing UT.

Closes #30442 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33498.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-27 13:24:11 +00:00
gengjiaan e43255051c [SPARK-28645][SQL] ParseException is thrown when the window is redefined
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in Spark one could redefine a window. For instance:

`select count(*) OVER w FROM tenk1 WINDOW w AS (ORDER BY unique1), w AS (ORDER BY unique1);`
The window `w` is defined two times. In PgSQL, on the other hand, a thrown will happen:

`ERROR:  window "w" is already defined`

### Why are the changes needed?
The current implement gives the following window definitions a higher priority. But it wasn't Spark's intention and users can't know from any document of Spark.
This PR fixes the bug.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
There is an example query output with/without this fix.
```
SELECT
    employee_name,
    salary,
    first_value(employee_name) OVER w highest_salary,
    nth_value(employee_name, 2) OVER w second_highest_salary
FROM
    basic_pays
WINDOW
    w AS (ORDER BY salary DESC ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING),
    w AS (ORDER BY salary DESC ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 2 FOLLOWING)
ORDER BY salary DESC
```
The output before this fix:
```
Larry Bott	11798	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Gerard Bondur	11472	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Pamela Castillo	11303	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Barry Jones	10586	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
George Vanauf	10563	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Loui Bondur	10449	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Mary Patterson	9998	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Steve Patterson	9441	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Julie Firrelli	9181	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Jeff Firrelli	8992	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
William Patterson	8870	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Diane Murphy	8435	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Leslie Jennings	8113	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Gerard Hernandez	6949	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Foon Yue Tseng	6660	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Anthony Bow	6627	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
Leslie Thompson	5186	Larry Bott	Gerard Bondur
```
The output after this fix:
```
struct<>
-- !query output
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException

The definition of window 'w' is repetitive(line 8, pos 0)
```

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.

Closes #30512 from beliefer/SPARK-28645.

Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-27 10:27:08 +00:00
Terry Kim 2c41d9d8fa [SPARK-33522][SQL] Improve exception messages while handling UnresolvedTableOrView
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to improve the exception messages while `UnresolvedTableOrView` is handled based on this suggestion: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30321#discussion_r521127001.

Currently, when an identifier is resolved to a temp view when a table/permanent view is expected, the following exception message is displayed (e.g., for `SHOW CREATE TABLE`):
```
t is a temp view not table or permanent view.
```
After this PR, the message will be:
```
t is a temp view. 'SHOW CREATE TABLE' expects a table or permanent view.
```

Also, if an identifier is not resolved, the following exception message is currently used:
```
Table or view not found: t
```
After this PR, the message will be:
```
Table or permanent view not found for 'SHOW CREATE TABLE': t
```
or
```
Table or view not found for 'ANALYZE TABLE ... FOR COLUMNS ...': t
```

### Why are the changes needed?

To improve the exception message.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the exception message will be changed as described above.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing tests.

Closes #30475 from imback82/unresolved_table_or_view.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-27 10:16:56 +00:00
Terry Kim 8792280a73 [SPARK-33575][SQL] Fix misleading exception for "ANALYZE TABLE ... FOR COLUMNS" on temporary views
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to fix the exception message for `ANALYZE TABLE ... FOR COLUMNS` on temporary views.

The current behavior throws `NoSuchTableException` even if the temporary view exists:
```
sql("CREATE TEMP VIEW t AS SELECT 1 AS id")
sql("ANALYZE TABLE t COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR COLUMNS id")
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.NoSuchTableException: Table or view 't' not found in database 'db';
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.AnalyzeColumnCommand.analyzeColumnInTempView(AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala:76)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.AnalyzeColumnCommand.run(AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala:54)
```

After this PR, more reasonable exception is thrown:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Temporary view `testView` is not cached for analyzing columns.;
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.AnalyzeColumnCommand.analyzeColumnInTempView(AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala:74)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.AnalyzeColumnCommand.run(AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala:54)
```

### Why are the changes needed?

To fix a misleading exception.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the exception thrown is changed as shown above.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing test.

Closes #30519 from imback82/analyze_table_message.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-27 07:08:24 +00:00
yangjie01 433ae9064f [SPARK-33566][CORE][SQL][SS][PYTHON] Make unescapedQuoteHandling option configurable when read CSV
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some differences between Spark CSV, opencsv and commons-csv, the typical case are described in SPARK-33566, When there are both unescaped quotes and unescaped qualifier in value,  the results of parsing are different.

The reason for the difference is Spark use `STOP_AT_DELIMITER` as default `UnescapedQuoteHandling` to build `CsvParser` and it not configurable.

On the other hand, opencsv and commons-csv use the parsing mechanism similar to `STOP_AT_CLOSING_QUOTE ` by default.

So this pr make `unescapedQuoteHandling` option configurable to get the same parsing result as opencsv and commons-csv.

### Why are the changes needed?
Make unescapedQuoteHandling option configurable when read CSV to make parsing more flexible。

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?

- Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action

- Add a new case similar to that described in SPARK-33566

Closes #30518 from LuciferYang/SPARK-33566.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-27 15:47:39 +09:00
Maryann Xue dfa3978d91 [SPARK-33551][SQL] Do not use custom shuffle reader for repartition
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes an AQE issue where local shuffle reader, partition coalescing, or skew join optimization can be mistakenly applied to a shuffle introduced by repartition or a regular shuffle that logically replaces a repartition shuffle.
The proposed solution checks for the presence of any repartition shuffle and filters out not applicable optimization rules for the final stage in an AQE plan.

### Why are the changes needed?

Without the change, the output of a repartition query may not be correct.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Added UT.

Closes #30494 from maryannxue/csr-repartition.

Authored-by: Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2020-11-25 19:32:22 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh fb7b870214 [SPARK-33523][SQL][TEST][FOLLOWUP] Fix benchmark case name in SubExprEliminationBenchmark
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix the wrong benchmark case name.

### Why are the changes needed?

The last commit to refactor the benchmark code missed a change of case name.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30505 from viirya/SPARK-33523-followup.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-25 15:22:47 -08:00
Yuming Wang 1de3fc4282 [SPARK-33525][SQL] Update hive-service-rpc to 3.1.2
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We supported Hive metastore are 0.12.0 through 3.1.2, but we supported hive-jdbc are 0.12.0 through 2.3.7. It will throw `TProtocolException` if we use hive-jdbc 3.x:

```
[rootspark-3267648 apache-hive-3.1.2-bin]# bin/beeline -u jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default
Connecting to jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default
Connected to: Spark SQL (version 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
Driver: Hive JDBC (version 3.1.2)
Transaction isolation: TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ
Beeline version 3.1.2 by Apache Hive
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default> create table t1(id int) using parquet;
Unexpected end of file when reading from HS2 server. The root cause might be too many concurrent connections. Please ask the administrator to check the number of active connections, and adjust hive.server2.thrift.max.worker.threads if applicable.
Error: org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException (state=08S01,code=0)
```
```
org.apache.thrift.protocol.TProtocolException: Missing version in readMessageBegin, old client?
	at org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readMessageBegin(TBinaryProtocol.java:234)
	at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:27)
	at org.apache.hive.service.auth.TSetIpAddressProcessor.process(TSetIpAddressProcessor.java:53)
	at org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadPoolServer$WorkerProcess.run(TThreadPoolServer.java:310)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:630)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:832)
```

This pr upgrade hive-service-rpc to 3.1.2 to fix this issue.

### Why are the changes needed?

To support hive-jdbc 3.x.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual test:
```
[rootspark-3267648 apache-hive-3.1.2-bin]# bin/beeline -u jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default
Connecting to jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default
Connected to: Spark SQL (version 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
Driver: Hive JDBC (version 3.1.2)
Transaction isolation: TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ
Beeline version 3.1.2 by Apache Hive
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default> create table t1(id int) using parquet;
+---------+
| Result  |
+---------+
+---------+
No rows selected (1.051 seconds)
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default> insert into t1 values(1);
+---------+
| Result  |
+---------+
+---------+
No rows selected (2.08 seconds)
0: jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000/default> select * from t1;
+-----+
| id  |
+-----+
| 1   |
+-----+
1 row selected (0.605 seconds)
```

Closes #30478 from wangyum/SPARK-33525.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-25 12:37:59 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 7cf6a6f996 [SPARK-31257][SPARK-33561][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix Scala 2.13 compilation
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a follow-up to fix Scala 2.13 compilation.

### Why are the changes needed?

To support Scala 2.13 in Apache Spark 3.1.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the GitHub Action Scala 2.13 compilation job.

Closes #30502 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31257.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-25 09:57:46 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 9643eab53e [SPARK-33540][SQL] Subexpression elimination for interpreted predicate
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch proposes to support subexpression elimination for interpreted predicate.

### Why are the changes needed?

Similar to interpreted projection, there are use cases when codegen predicate is not able to work, e.g. too complex schema, non-codegen expression, etc. When there are frequently occurring expressions (subexpressions) among predicate expression, the performance is quite bad as we need to re-compute same expressions. We should be able to support subexpression elimination for interpreted predicate like interpreted projection.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, this doesn't change user behavior.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test and benchmark.

Closes #30497 from viirya/SPARK-33540.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-25 08:55:39 -08:00
Gengliang Wang d691d85701 [SPARK-33496][SQL] Improve error message of ANSI explicit cast
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30260, there are some type conversions disallowed under ANSI mode.
We should tell users what they can do if they have to use the disallowed casting.

### Why are the changes needed?

Make it more user-friendly.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the error message is improved on casting failure when ANSI mode is enabled
### How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

Closes #30440 from gengliangwang/improveAnsiCastErrorMSG.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 23:15:52 +08:00
Ryan Blue 6f68ccf532 [SPARK-31257][SPARK-33561][SQL] Unify create table syntax
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

* Unify the create table syntax in the parser by merging Hive and DataSource clauses
* Add `SerdeInfo` and `external` boolean to statement plans and update AstBuilder to produce them
* Add conversion from create statement plan to v1 create plans in ResolveSessionCatalog
* Support new statement clauses in ResolveCatalogs conversion to v2 create plans
* Remove SparkSqlParser rules for Hive syntax
* Add "option." namespace to distinguish SERDEPROPERTIES and OPTIONS in table properties

### Why are the changes needed?

* Current behavior is confusing.
* A way to pass the Hive create options to DSv2 is needed for a Hive source.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Not by default, but v2 sources will be able to handle STORED AS and other Hive clauses.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests validate there are no behavior changes.

Update unit tests for using a statement plan for Hive create syntax:
* Move create tests from spark-sql DDLParserSuite into PlanResolutionSuite
* Add parser tests to spark-catalyst DDLParserSuite

Closes #28026 from rdblue/unify-create-table.

Lead-authored-by: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 15:09:02 +00:00
duripeng 7c59aeeef4 [SPARK-27194][SPARK-29302][SQL] Fix commit collision in dynamic partition overwrite mode
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When using dynamic partition overwrite, each task has its working dir under staging dir like `stagingDir/.spark-staging-{jobId}`, each task commits to `outputPath/.spark-staging-{jobId}/{partitionId}/part-{taskId}-{jobId}{ext}`.
When speculation enable, multiple task attempts would be setup for one task, **they have same task id and they would commit to same file concurrently**. Due to host done or node preemption, the partly-committed files aren't cleaned up, a FileAlreadyExistsException would be raised in this situation, resulting in job failure.

I don't try to change task commit process for dynamic partition overwrite, like adding attempt id to task working dir for each attempts and committing to final output dir via a new outputCommitCoordinator, here is reason:

1. `FileOutputCommitter` already has commit coordinator for each task attempts, we can leverage it rather than build a new one.
2. To say the least, we implement a coordinator solving task attempts commit conflict, suppose a severe case, application master failover, tasks with same attempt id and same task id would commit to same files, the `FileAlreadyExistsException` risk still exists

In this pr, I leverage FileOutputCommitter to solve the problem:

1. when initing a write job description, set `outputPath/.spark-staging-{jobId}` as the output dir
2. each task attempt writes output to `outputPath/.spark-staging-{jobId}/_temporary/${appAttemptId}/_temporary/${taskAttemptId}/{partitionId}/part-{taskId}-{jobId}{ext}`
3. leverage `FileOutputCommitter` coordinator, write job firstly commits output to `outputPath/.spark-staging-{jobId}/{partitionId}`
4. for dynamic partition overwrite, write job finally move `outputPath/.spark-staging-{jobId}/{partitionId}` to `outputPath/{partitionId}`

### Why are the changes needed?

Without this pr, dynamic partition overwrite would fail

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

added UT.

Closes #29000 from WinkerDu/master-fix-dynamic-partition-multi-commit.

Authored-by: duripeng <duripeng@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 12:50:21 +00:00
Max Gekk 2c5cc36e3f [SPARK-33509][SQL] List partition by names from a V2 table which supports partition management
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add new method `listPartitionByNames` to the `SupportsPartitionManagement` interface. It allows to list partitions by partition names and their values.
2. Implement new method in `InMemoryPartitionTable` which is used in DSv2 tests.

### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the `SupportsPartitionManagement` interface exposes only `listPartitionIdentifiers` which allows to list partitions by partition values. And it requires to specify all values for partition schema fields in the prefix. This restriction does not allow to list partitions by some of partition names (not all of them).

For example, the table `tableA` is partitioned by two column `year` and `month`
```
CREATE TABLE tableA (price int, year int, month int)
USING _
partitioned by (year, month)
```
and has the following partitions:
```
PARTITION(year = 2015, month = 1)
PARTITION(year = 2015, month = 2)
PARTITION(year = 2016, month = 2)
PARTITION(year = 2016, month = 3)
```
If we want to list all partitions with `month = 2`, we have to specify `year` for **listPartitionIdentifiers()** which not always possible as we don't know all `year` values in advance. New method **listPartitionByNames()** allows to specify partition values only for `month`, and get two partitions:
```
PARTITION(year = 2015, month = 2)
PARTITION(year = 2016, month = 2)
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suite `SupportsPartitionManagementSuite`.

Closes #30452 from MaxGekk/column-names-listPartitionIdentifiers.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 12:41:53 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 19f3b89d62 [SPARK-33549][SQL] Remove configuration spark.sql.legacy.allowCastNumericToTimestamp
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove SQL configuration spark.sql.legacy.allowCastNumericToTimestamp

### Why are the changes needed?

In the current master branch, there is a new configuration `spark.sql.legacy.allowCastNumericToTimestamp` which controls whether to cast Numeric types to Timestamp or not. The default value is true.

After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30260, the type conversion between Timestamp type and Numeric type is disallowed in ANSI mode. So, we don't need to a separate configuration `spark.sql.legacy.allowCastNumericToTimestamp` for disallowing the conversion. Users just need to set `spark.sql.ansi.enabled` for the behavior.

As the configuration is not in any released yet, we should remove the configuration to make things simpler.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, since the configuration is not released yet.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing test cases

Closes #30493 from gengliangwang/LEGACY_ALLOW_CAST_NUMERIC_TO_TIMESTAMP.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 08:59:31 +00:00
Yuming Wang 781e19c4d1 [SPARK-33477][SQL] Hive Metastore support filter by date type
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Hive Metastore supports strings and integral types in filters. It could also support dates. Please see [HIVE-5679](5106bf1c86) for more details.

This pr add support it.

### Why are the changes needed?

Improve query performance.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30408 from wangyum/SPARK-33477.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-25 16:38:55 +09:00
Kousuke Saruta c3ce9701b4 [SPARK-33533][SQL] Fix the regression bug that ConnectionProviders don't consider case-sensitivity for properties
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes an issue that `BasicConnectionProvider` doesn't consider case-sensitivity for properties.
For example, the property `oracle.jdbc.mapDateToTimestamp` should be considered case-sensitivity but it is not considered.

### Why are the changes needed?

This is a bug introduced by #29024 .
Caused by this issue, `OracleIntegrationSuite` doesn't pass.

```
[info] - SPARK-16625: General data types to be mapped to Oracle *** FAILED *** (32 seconds, 129 milliseconds)
[info]   types.apply(9).equals(org.apache.spark.sql.types.DateType) was false (OracleIntegrationSuite.scala:238)
[info]   org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException:
[info]   at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:472)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:471)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Assertions$.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:1231)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:1295)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.OracleIntegrationSuite.$anonfun$new$4(OracleIntegrationSuite.scala:238)
[info]   at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
[info]   at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
[info]   at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:190)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withFixture(SparkFunSuite.scala:176)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:188)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:200)
[info]   at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:306)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:200)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:182)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterEach$$super$runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
[info]   at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:234)
[info]   at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest$(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:227)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:233)
[info]   at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:413)
[info]   at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
[info]   at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:401)
[info]   at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:396)
[info]   at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsImpl(Engine.scala:475)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:233)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:232)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.runTests(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Suite.run(Suite.scala:1112)
[info]   at org.scalatest.Suite.run$(Suite.scala:1094)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.org$scalatest$funsuite$AnyFunSuiteLike$$super$run(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$run$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:237)
[info]   at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runImpl(Engine.scala:535)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:237)
[info]   at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:236)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterAll$$super$run(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
[info]   at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.liftedTree1$1(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:213)
[info]   at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:210)
[info]   at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run$(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:208)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.run(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
[info]   at org.scalatest.tools.Framework.org$scalatest$tools$Framework$$runSuite(Framework.scala:318)
[info]   at org.scalatest.tools.Framework$ScalaTestTask.execute(Framework.scala:513)
[info]   at sbt.ForkMain$Run.lambda$runTest$1(ForkMain.java:413)
[info]   at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
[info]   at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[info]   at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[info]   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

With this change, I confirmed that `OracleIntegrationSuite` passes with the following command.
```
$ git clone https://github.com/oracle/docker-images.git
$ cd docker-images/OracleDatabase/SingleInstance/dockerfiles
$ ./buildDockerImage.sh -v 18.4.0 -x
$ ORACLE_DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME=oracle/database:18.4.0-xe build/sbt  -Pdocker-integration-tests -Phive -Phive-thriftserver "testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.OracleIntegrationSuite"
```

Closes #30485 from sarutak/fix-oracle-integration-suite.

Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-24 20:18:45 -08:00
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) edab094dda [SPARK-33224][SS][WEBUI] Add watermark gap information into SS UI page
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to add the watermark gap information in SS UI page. Please refer below screenshots to see what we'd like to show in UI.

![Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 6 56 38 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1317309/99669306-3532d080-2ab2-11eb-9a93-03d2c6a54948.png)

Please note that this PR doesn't plot the watermark value - knowing the gap between actual wall clock and watermark looks more useful than the absolute value.

### Why are the changes needed?

Watermark is the one of major metrics the end users need to track for stateful queries. Watermark defines "when" the output will be emitted for append mode, hence knowing how much gap between wall clock and watermark (input data) is very helpful to make expectation of the output.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, SS UI query page will contain the watermark gap information.

### How was this patch tested?

Basic UT added. Manually tested with two queries:

> simple case

You'll see consistent watermark gap with (15 seconds + a) = 10 seconds are from delay in watermark definition, 5 seconds are trigger interval.

```
import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.Trigger

spark.conf.set("spark.sql.shuffle.partitions", "10")

val query = spark
  .readStream
  .format("rate")
  .option("rowsPerSecond", 1000)
  .option("rampUpTime", "10s")
  .load()
  .selectExpr("timestamp", "mod(value, 100) as mod", "value")
  .withWatermark("timestamp", "10 seconds")
  .groupBy(window($"timestamp", "1 minute", "10 seconds"), $"mod")
  .agg(max("value").as("max_value"), min("value").as("min_value"), avg("value").as("avg_value"))
  .writeStream
  .format("console")
  .trigger(Trigger.ProcessingTime("5 seconds"))
  .outputMode("append")
  .start()

query.awaitTermination()
```

![Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 7 00 21 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1317309/99669049-dbcaa180-2ab1-11eb-8789-10b35857dda0.png)

> complicated case

This randomizes the timestamp, hence producing random watermark gap. This won't be smaller than 15 seconds as I described earlier.

```
import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.Trigger

spark.conf.set("spark.sql.shuffle.partitions", "10")

val query = spark
  .readStream
  .format("rate")
  .option("rowsPerSecond", 1000)
  .option("rampUpTime", "10s")
  .load()
  .selectExpr("*", "CAST(CAST(timestamp AS BIGINT) - CAST((RAND() * 100000) AS BIGINT) AS TIMESTAMP) AS tsMod")
  .selectExpr("tsMod", "mod(value, 100) as mod", "value")
  .withWatermark("tsMod", "10 seconds")
  .groupBy(window($"tsMod", "1 minute", "10 seconds"), $"mod")
  .agg(max("value").as("max_value"), min("value").as("min_value"), avg("value").as("avg_value"))
  .writeStream
  .format("console")
  .trigger(Trigger.ProcessingTime("5 seconds"))
  .outputMode("append")
  .start()

query.awaitTermination()
```

![Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 6 56 47 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1317309/99669029-d5d4c080-2ab1-11eb-9c63-d05b3e1ab391.png)

Closes #30427 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-33224.

Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-25 13:12:20 +09:00
Terry Kim b7f034d8dc [SPARK-33543][SQL] Migrate SHOW COLUMNS command to use UnresolvedTableOrView to resolve the identifier
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to migrate `SHOW COLUMNS` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table/view identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).

Note that `SHOW COLUMNS` is not yet supported for v2 tables.

### Why are the changes needed?

To use `UnresolvedTableOrView` for table/view resolution. Note that `ShowColumnsCommand` internally resolves to a temp view first, so there is no resolution behavior change with this PR.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing tests.

Closes #30490 from imback82/show_columns.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 03:04:04 +00:00
Wenchen Fan d1b4f06179 [SPARK-33494][SQL][AQE] Do not use local shuffle reader for repartition
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR updates `ShuffleExchangeExec` to carry more information about how much we can change the partitioning. For `repartition(col)`, we should preserve the user-specified partitioning and don't apply the AQE local shuffle reader.

### Why are the changes needed?

Similar to `repartition(number, col)`, we should respect the user-specified partitioning.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

a new test

Closes #30432 from cloud-fan/aqe.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-25 02:02:32 +00:00
Gabor Somogyi 95b6dabc33 [SPARK-33287][SS][UI] Expose state custom metrics information on SS UI
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Structured Streaming UI is not containing state custom metrics information. In this PR I've added it.

### Why are the changes needed?
Missing state custom metrics information.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Additional UI elements appear.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + manual test.
```
#Compile Spark
echo "spark.sql.streaming.ui.enabledCustomMetricList stateOnCurrentVersionSizeBytes" >> conf/spark-defaults.conf
sbin/start-master.sh
sbin/start-worker.sh spark://gsomogyi-MBP16:7077
./bin/spark-submit --master spark://gsomogyi-MBP16:7077 --deploy-mode client --class com.spark.Main ../spark-test/target/spark-test-1.0-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar
```
<img width="1119" alt="Screenshot 2020-11-18 at 12 45 36" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18561820/99527506-2f979680-299d-11eb-9187-4ae7fbd2596a.png">

Closes #30336 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-33287.

Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-25 07:38:45 +09:00
Terry Kim fdd6c73b3c [SPARK-33514][SQL] Migrate TRUNCATE TABLE command to use UnresolvedTable to resolve the identifier
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to migrate `TRUNCATE TABLE` to use `UnresolvedTable` to resolve the table identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).

Note that `TRUNCATE TABLE` works only with v1 tables, and not supported for v2 tables.

### Why are the changes needed?

The changes allow consistent resolution behavior when resolving the table identifier. For example, the following is the current behavior:
```scala
sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW t AS SELECT 1")
sql("CREATE DATABASE db")
sql("CREATE TABLE t using csv AS SELECT 1")
sql("USE db")
sql("TRUNCATE TABLE t") // Succeeds
```
With this PR, `TRUNCATE TABLE` above fails with the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: t is a temp view not table.; line 1 pos 0
    at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
    at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveTempViews$$anonfun$apply$7.$anonfun$applyOrElse$42(Analyzer.scala:866)

```
, which is expected since temporary view is resolved first and `TRUNCATE TABLE` doesn't support a temporary view.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

After this PR, `TRUNCATE TABLE` is resolved to a temp view `t` instead of table `db.t` in the above scenario.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing tests.

Closes #30457 from imback82/truncate_table.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-24 11:06:39 +00:00
Max Gekk a6555ee596 [SPARK-33521][SQL] Universal type conversion in resolving V2 partition specs
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to changes the resolver of partition specs used in V2 `ALTER TABLE .. ADD/DROP PARTITION` (at the moment), and re-use `CAST` in conversion partition values to desired types according to the partition schema.

### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the resolver of V2 partition specs supports just a few types: 23e9920b39/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolvePartitionSpec.scala (L72), and fails on other types like date/timestamp.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes

### How was this patch tested?
By running `AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite`

Closes #30474 from MaxGekk/dsv2-partition-value-types.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-24 08:04:21 +00:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh f35e28fea5 [SPARK-33523][SQL][TEST] Add predicate related benchmark to SubExprEliminationBenchmark
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch adds predicate related benchmark to `SubExprEliminationBenchmark`.

### Why are the changes needed?

We should have a benchmark for subexpression elimination of predicate.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Run benchmark locally.

Closes #30476 from viirya/SPARK-33523.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-24 13:30:06 +09:00
Dongjoon Hyun 8380e00419
[SPARK-33524][SQL][TESTS] Change InMemoryTable not to use Tuple.hashCode for BucketTransform
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to change `InMemoryTable` not to use `Tuple.hashCode` for `BucketTransform`.

### Why are the changes needed?

SPARK-32168 made `InMemoryTable` to handle `BucketTransform` as a hash of `Tuple` which is dependents on Scala versions.
- https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/InMemoryTable.scala#L159

**Scala 2.12.10**
```scala
$ bin/scala
Welcome to Scala 2.12.10 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_272).
Type in expressions for evaluation. Or try :help.

scala> (1, 1).hashCode
res0: Int = -2074071657
```

**Scala 2.13.3**
```scala
Welcome to Scala 2.13.3 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_272).
Type in expressions for evaluation. Or try :help.

scala> (1, 1).hashCode
val res0: Int = -1669302457
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes. This is a correctness issue.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the UT with both Scala 2.12/2.13.

Closes #30477 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33524.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-23 19:35:58 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3ce4ab545b
[SPARK-33513][BUILD] Upgrade to Scala 2.13.4 to improve exhaustivity
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims the followings.
1. Upgrade from Scala 2.13.3 to 2.13.4 for Apache Spark 3.1
2. Fix exhaustivity issues in both Scala 2.12/2.13 (Scala 2.13.4 requires this for compilation.)
3. Enforce the improved exhaustive check by using the existing Scala 2.13 GitHub Action compilation job.

### Why are the changes needed?

Scala 2.13.4 is a maintenance release for 2.13 line and improves JDK 15 support.
- https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.13.4

Also, it improves exhaustivity check.
- https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/9140 (Check exhaustivity of pattern matches with "if" guards and custom extractors)
- https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/9147 (Check all bindings exhaustively, e.g. tuples components)

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yep. Although it's a maintenance version change, it's a Scala version change.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs and do the manual testing.
- Scala 2.12 CI jobs(GitHub Action/Jenkins UT/Jenkins K8s IT) to check the validity of code change.
- Scala 2.13 Compilation job to check the compilation

Closes #30455 from dongjoon-hyun/SCALA_3.13.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-23 16:28:43 -08:00
gengjiaan f83fcb1254 [SPARK-33278][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Improve OptimizeWindowFunctions to avoid transfer first to nth_value
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30178 provided `OptimizeWindowFunctions` used to transfer `first` to `nth_value`.
If the window frame is `UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW` or `UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING`, `nth_value` has better performance than `first`.
But the `OptimizeWindowFunctions` need to exclude other window frame.

### Why are the changes needed?
 Improve `OptimizeWindowFunctions` to avoid transfer `first` to `nth_value` if the specified window frame isn't `UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW` or `UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.

Closes #30419 from beliefer/SPARK-33278_followup.

Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-23 14:54:44 +00:00
Max Gekk 23e9920b39 [SPARK-33511][SQL] Respect case sensitivity while resolving V2 partition specs
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Pre-process partition specs in `ResolvePartitionSpec`, and convert partition names according to the partition schema and the SQL config `spark.sql.caseSensitive`. In the PR, I propose to invoke `normalizePartitionSpec` for that. The function is used in DSv1 commands, so, the behavior will be similar to DSv1.
2. Move `normalizePartitionSpec()` from `sql/core/.../datasources/PartitioningUtils` to `sql/catalyst/.../util/PartitioningUtils` to use it in Catalyst's rule `ResolvePartitionSpec`

### Why are the changes needed?
DSv1 commands like `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION` and `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` respect the SQL config `spark.sql.caseSensitive` while resolving partition specs. For example:
```sql
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE tbl1 (id bigint, data string) USING parquet PARTITIONED BY (id);
spark-sql> ALTER TABLE tbl1 ADD PARTITION (ID=1);
spark-sql> SHOW PARTITIONS tbl1;
id=1
```
The same command fails on V2 Table catalog with error:
```
AnalysisException: Partition key ID not exists
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, partition spec resolution works as for DSv1 (without the exception showed above).

### How was this patch tested?
By running `AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite`.

Closes #30454 from MaxGekk/partition-spec-case-sensitivity.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-23 09:00:41 +00:00
Terry Kim 60f3a730e4 [SPARK-33515][SQL] Improve exception messages while handling UnresolvedTable
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to improve the exception messages while `UnresolvedTable` is handled based on this suggestion: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30321#discussion_r521127001.

Currently, when an identifier is resolved to a view when a table is expected, the following exception message is displayed (e.g., for `COMMENT ON TABLE`):
```
v is a temp view not table.
```
After this PR, the message will be:
```
v is a temp view. 'COMMENT ON TABLE' expects a table.
```

Also, if an identifier is not resolved, the following exception message is currently used:
```
Table not found: t
```
After this PR, the message will be:
```
Table not found for 'COMMENT ON TABLE': t
```

### Why are the changes needed?

To improve the exception message.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the exception message will be changed as described above.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing tests.

Closes #30461 from imback82/unresolved_table_message.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-23 08:54:00 +00:00
Xiao Li c891e025b8 Revert "[SPARK-32481][CORE][SQL] Support truncate table to move data to trash"
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This reverts commit 065f17386d, which is not part of any released version. That is, this is an unreleased feature

### Why are the changes needed?

I like the concept of Trash, but I think this PR might just resolve a very specific issue by introducing a mechanism without a proper design doc. This could make the usage more complex.

I think we need to consider the big picture. Trash directory is an important concept. If we decide to introduce it, we should consider all the code paths of Spark SQL that could delete the data, instead of Truncate only. We also need to consider what is the current behavior if the underlying file system does not provide the API `Trash.moveToAppropriateTrash`. Is the exception good? How about the performance when users are using the object store instead of HDFS? Will it impact the GDPR compliance?

In sum, I think we should not merge the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29552 without the design doc and implementation plan. That is why I reverted it before the code freeze of Spark 3.1

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Reverted the original commit

### How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.

Closes #30463 from gatorsmile/revertSpark-32481.

Authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-23 17:43:58 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh aa78c05edc [SPARK-33427][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Put key and value into IdentityHashMap sequantially
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This follow-up fixes an issue when inserting key/value pairs into `IdentityHashMap` in `SubExprEvaluationRuntime`.

### Why are the changes needed?

The last commits to #30341 follows review comment to use `IdentityHashMap`. Because we leverage `IdentityHashMap` to compare keys in reference, we should not convert expression pairs to Scala map before inserting. Scala map compares keys by equality so we will loss keys with different references.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Run benchmark to verify.

Closes #30459 from viirya/SPARK-33427-map.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-23 10:42:28 +09:00
ulysses 6d625ccd5b
[SPARK-33469][SQL] Add current_timezone function
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add a `CurrentTimeZone` function and replace the value at `Optimizer` side.

### Why are the changes needed?

Let user get current timezone easily. Then user can call
```
SELECT current_timezone()
```

Presto: https://prestodb.io/docs/current/functions/datetime.html
SQL Server: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/current-timezone-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, a new function.

### How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Closes #30400 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33469.

Lead-authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Co-authored-by: ulysses-you <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-22 15:36:44 -08:00
CC Highman d338af3101 [SPARK-31962][SQL] Provide modifiedAfter and modifiedBefore options when filtering from a batch-based file data source
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Two new options, _modifiiedBefore_  and _modifiedAfter_, is provided expecting a value in 'YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss' format.  _PartioningAwareFileIndex_ considers these options during the process of checking for files, just before considering applied _PathFilters_ such as `pathGlobFilter.`  In order to filter file results, a new PathFilter class was derived for this purpose.  General house-keeping around classes extending PathFilter was performed for neatness.  It became apparent support was needed to handle multiple potential path filters.  Logic was introduced for this purpose and the associated tests written.

### Why are the changes needed?

When loading files from a data source, there can often times be thousands of file within a respective file path.  In many cases I've seen, we want to start loading from a folder path and ideally be able to begin loading files having modification dates past a certain point.  This would mean out of thousands of potential files, only the ones with modification dates greater than the specified timestamp would be considered.  This saves a ton of time automatically and reduces significant complexity managing this in code.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

This PR introduces an option that can be used with batch-based Spark file data sources.  A documentation update was made to reflect an example and usage of the new data source option.

**Example Usages**
_Load all CSV files modified after date:_
`spark.read.format("csv").option("modifiedAfter","2020-06-15T05:00:00").load()`

_Load all CSV files modified before date:_
`spark.read.format("csv").option("modifiedBefore","2020-06-15T05:00:00").load()`

_Load all CSV files modified between two dates:_
`spark.read.format("csv").option("modifiedAfter","2019-01-15T05:00:00").option("modifiedBefore","2020-06-15T05:00:00").load()
`

### How was this patch tested?

A handful of unit tests were added to support the positive, negative, and edge case code paths.

It's also live in a handful of our Databricks dev environments.  (quoted from cchighman)

Closes #30411 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-31962.

Lead-authored-by: CC Highman <christopher.highman@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-23 08:30:41 +09:00
angerszhu d7f4b2ad50 [SPARK-28704][SQL][TEST] Add back Skiped HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite in HiveSparkSubmitSuite at JDK9+
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We skip test HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite when testing with JAVA_9 or later because our previous version does not support JAVA_9 or later. We now add it back since we have a version supports JAVA_9 or later.

### Why are the changes needed?

To recover test coverage.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Check CI logs.

Closes #30451 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-28704.

Authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-22 10:29:15 -08:00
Gustavo Martin Morcuende 517b810dfa
[SPARK-33463][SQL] Keep Job Id during incremental collect in Spark Thrift Server
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When enabling **spark.sql.thriftServer.incrementalCollect** Job Ids get lost and tracing queries in Spark Thrift Server ends up being too complicated.

### Why are the changes needed?

Because it will make easier tracing Spark Thrift Server queries.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

The current tests are enough. No need of more tests.

Closes #30390 from gumartinm/master.

Authored-by: Gustavo Martin Morcuende <gu.martinm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-21 08:39:16 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun cf7490112a
Revert "[SPARK-28704][SQL][TEST] Add back Skiped HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite in HiveSparkSubmitSuite at JDK9+"
This reverts commit 47326ac1c6.
2020-11-20 19:01:58 -08:00
Max Gekk 530c0a8e28
[SPARK-33505][SQL][TESTS] Fix adding new partitions by INSERT INTO InMemoryPartitionTable
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add a hook method to `addPartitionKey()` of `InMemoryTable` which is called per every row.
2. Override `addPartitionKey()` in `InMemoryPartitionTable`, and add partition key every time when new row is inserted to the table.

### Why are the changes needed?
To be able to write unified tests for datasources V1 and V2. Currently, INSERT INTO a V1 table creates partitions but the same doesn't work for the custom catalog `InMemoryPartitionTableCatalog` used in DSv2 tests.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suite `DataSourceV2SQLSuite`.

Closes #30449 from MaxGekk/insert-into-InMemoryPartitionTable.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-20 18:41:25 -08:00
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 67c6ed9068 [SPARK-33223][SS][FOLLOWUP] Clarify the meaning of "number of rows dropped by watermark" in SS UI page
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes the representation to clarify the meaning of "number of rows dropped by watermark" in SS UI page.

### Why are the changes needed?

`Aggregated Number Of State Rows Dropped By Watermark` says that the dropped rows are from the state, whereas they're not. We say "evicted from the state" for the case, which is "normal" to emit outputs and reduce memory usage of the state.

The metric actually represents the number of "input" rows dropped by watermark, and the meaning of "input" is relative to the "stateful operator". That's a bit confusing as we normally think "input" as "input from source" whereas it's not.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, UI element & tooltip change.

### How was this patch tested?

Only text change in UI, so we know how thing will be changed intuitively.

Closes #30439 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-33223-FOLLOWUP.

Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-21 10:27:00 +09:00
anchovYu de0f50abf4 [SPARK-32670][SQL] Group exception messages in Catalyst Analyzer in one file
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Group all messages of `AnalysisExcpetions` created and thrown directly in org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer in one file.
* Create a new object: `org.apache.spark.sql.CatalystErrors` with many exception-creating functions.
* When the `Analyzer` wants to create and throw a new `AnalysisException`, call functions of `CatalystErrors`

### Why are the changes needed?

This is the sample PR that groups exception messages together in several files. It will largely help with standardization of error messages and its maintenance.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No. Error messages remain unchanged.

### How was this patch tested?

No new tests - pass all original tests to make sure it doesn't break any existing behavior.

### Naming of exception functions

All function names ended with `Error`.
* For specific errors like `groupingIDMismatch` and `groupingColInvalid`, directly use them as name, just like `groupingIDMismatchError` and `groupingColInvalidError`.
* For generic errors like `dataTypeMismatch`,
  * if confident with the context, prefix and condition can be added, like `pivotValDataTypeMismatchError`
  * if not sure about the context, add a `For` suffix of the specific component that this exception is related to, like `dataTypeMismatchForDeserializerError`

Closes #29497 from anchovYu/32670.

Lead-authored-by: anchovYu <aureole@sjtu.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: anchovYu <xyyu15@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-21 08:33:39 +09:00
Chao Sun 2479778934
[SPARK-33492][SQL] DSv2: Append/Overwrite/ReplaceTable should invalidate cache
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This adds changes in the following places:
- logic to also refresh caches referencing the target table in v2 `AppendDataExec`, `OverwriteByExpressionExec`, `OverwritePartitionsDynamicExec`, as well as their v1 fallbacks `AppendDataExecV1` and `OverwriteByExpressionExecV1`.
- logic to invalidate caches referencing the target table in v2 `ReplaceTableAsSelectExec` and its atomic version `AtomicReplaceTableAsSelectExec`. These are only supported in v2 at the moment though.

In addition to the above, in order to test the v1 write fallback behavior, I extended `InMemoryTableWithV1Fallback` to also support batch reads.

### Why are the changes needed?

Currently in DataSource v2 we don't refresh or invalidate caches referencing the target table when the table content is changed by operations such as append, overwrite, or replace table. This is different from DataSource v1, and could potentially cause data correctness issue if the staled caches are queried later.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes. Now When a data source v2 is cached (either directly or indirectly), all the relevant caches will be refreshed or invalidated if the table is replaced.

### How was this patch tested?

Added unit tests for the new code path.

Closes #30429 from sunchao/SPARK-33492.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-20 14:59:56 -08:00
angerszhu 47326ac1c6
[SPARK-28704][SQL][TEST] Add back Skiped HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite in HiveSparkSubmitSuite at JDK9+
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We skip test HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite when testing with JAVA_9 or later because our previous version does not support JAVA_9 or later. We now add it back since we have a version supports JAVA_9 or later.

### Why are the changes needed?

To recover test coverage.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Check CI logs.

Closes #30428 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-28704.

Authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-20 08:40:14 -08:00
ulysses 3384bda453 [SPARK-33468][SQL] ParseUrl in ANSI mode should fail if input string is not a valid url
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

With `ParseUrl`, instead of return null we throw exception if input string is not a vaild url.

### Why are the changes needed?

For ANSI mode.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, user will get exception if `set spark.sql.ansi.enabled=true`.

### How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Closes #30399 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33468.

Lead-authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Co-authored-by: ulysses-you <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-20 13:23:08 +00:00
Max Gekk 870d409533 [SPARK-32512][SQL][TESTS][FOLLOWUP] Remove duplicate tests for ALTER TABLE .. PARTITIONS from DataSourceV2SQLSuite
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove tests from `DataSourceV2SQLSuite` that were copied to `AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite` by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29339.

### Why are the changes needed?
- To reduce tests execution time
- To improve test maintenance

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified tests:
```
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly *DataSourceV2SQLSuite"
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly *AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite"
```

Closes #30444 from MaxGekk/dedup-tests-AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-20 12:53:45 +00:00
Gabor Somogyi 883a213a8f
[MINOR] Structured Streaming statistics page indent fix
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Structured Streaming statistics page code contains an indentation issue. This PR fixes it.

### Why are the changes needed?
Indent fix.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.

Closes #30434 from gaborgsomogyi/STAT-INDENT-FIX.

Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-19 13:36:45 -08:00
Chao Sun 6da8ade5f4
[SPARK-33045][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix build failure with Scala 2.13
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Explicitly convert `scala.collection.mutable.Buffer` to `Seq`. In Scala 2.13 `Seq` is an alias of `scala.collection.immutable.Seq` instead of `scala.collection.Seq`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Without the change build with Scala 2.13 fails with the following:
```
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala:1417:41: type mismatch;
[error]  found   : scala.collection.mutable.Buffer[org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String]
[error]  required: Seq[org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String]
[error]                 case null => LikeAll(e, patterns)
[error]                                         ^
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala:1418:41: type mismatch;
[error]  found   : scala.collection.mutable.Buffer[org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String]
[error]  required: Seq[org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String]
[error]                 case _ => NotLikeAll(e, patterns)
[error]                                         ^
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

N/A

Closes #30431 from sunchao/SPARK-33045-followup.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-19 12:42:33 -08:00
gengjiaan 3695e997d5 [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark already support `LIKE ALL` syntax, but it will throw `StackOverflowError` if there are many elements(more than 14378 elements). We should implement built-in function for LIKE ALL to fix this issue.

Why the stack overflow can happen in the current approach ?
The current approach uses reduceLeft to connect each `Like(e, p)`, this will lead the the call depth of the thread is too large, causing `StackOverflowError` problems.

Why the fix in this PR can avoid the error?
This PR support built-in function for `LIKE ALL` and avoid this issue.

### Why are the changes needed?
1.Fix the `StackOverflowError` issue.
2.Support built-in function `like_all`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.

Closes #29999 from beliefer/SPARK-33045-like_all.

Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-19 16:56:21 +00:00
ulysses 21b13506cd [SPARK-33442][SQL] Change Combine Limit to Eliminate limit using max row
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Change `CombineLimits` name to `EliminateLimits` and add check if `Limit` child max row <= limit.

### Why are the changes needed?

In Add-hoc scene, we always add limit for the query if user have no special limit value, but not all limit is nesessary.

A general negative example is
```
select count(*) from t limit 100000;
```

It will be great if we can eliminate limit at Spark side.

Also, we make a benchmark for this case
```
runBenchmark("Sort and Limit") {
  val N = 100000
  val benchmark = new Benchmark("benchmark sort and limit", N)

  benchmark.addCase("TakeOrderedAndProject", 3) { _ =>
    spark.range(N).toDF("c").repartition(200).sort("c").take(200000)
  }

  benchmark.addCase("Sort And Limit", 3) { _ =>
    withSQLConf("spark.sql.execution.topKSortFallbackThreshold" -> "-1") {
      spark.range(N).toDF("c").repartition(200).sort("c").take(200000)
    }
  }

  benchmark.addCase("Sort", 3) { _ =>
    spark.range(N).toDF("c").repartition(200).sort("c").collect()
  }
  benchmark.run()
}
```

and the result is
```
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_191-b12 on Mac OS X 10.15.6
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5257U CPU  2.70GHz
benchmark sort and limit:                 Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TakeOrderedAndProject                              1833           2259         382          0.1       18327.1       1.0X
Sort And Limit                                     1417           1658         285          0.1       14167.5       1.3X
Sort                                               1324           1484         225          0.1       13238.3       1.4X
```

It shows that it makes sense to replace `TakeOrderedAndProjectExec` with `Sort + Project`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Closes #30368 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33442.

Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-19 13:31:10 +00:00
allisonwang-db a03c540cf7 [SPARK-33472][SQL] Adjust RemoveRedundantSorts rule order
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR switched the order for the rule `RemoveRedundantSorts` and `EnsureRequirements` so that `EnsureRequirements` will be invoked before `RemoveRedundantSorts` to avoid IllegalArgumentException when instantiating PartitioningCollection.

### Why are the changes needed?
`RemoveRedundantSorts` rule uses SparkPlan's `outputPartitioning` to check whether a sort node is redundant. Currently, it is added before `EnsureRequirements`. Since `PartitioningCollection` requires left and right partitioning to have the same number of partitions, which is not necessarily true before applying `EnsureRequirements`, the rule can fail with the following exception:
```
IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: PartitioningCollection requires all of its partitionings have the same numPartitions.
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Unit test

Closes #30373 from allisonwang-db/sort-follow-up.

Authored-by: allisonwang-db <66282705+allisonwang-db@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-19 13:29:01 +00:00
allisonwang-db ef2638c3e3
[SPARK-33183][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Update rule RemoveRedundantSorts config version
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow up for #30093 to updates the config `spark.sql.execution.removeRedundantSorts` version to 2.4.8.

### Why are the changes needed?
To update the rule version it has been backported to 2.4. #30194

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
N/A

Closes #30420 from allisonwang-db/spark-33183-follow-up.

Authored-by: allisonwang-db <66282705+allisonwang-db@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-19 00:12:22 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun d5e7bd0cc4
[SPARK-33483][INFRA][TESTS] Fix rat exclusion patterns and add a LICENSE
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes the RAT exclusion rule which was originated from SPARK-1144 (Apache Spark 1.0)

### Why are the changes needed?

This prevents the situation like https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30415.

Currently, it missed `catalog` directory due to `.log` rule.
```
$ dev/check-license
Could not find Apache license headers in the following files:
 !????? /Users/dongjoon/APACHE/spark-merge/sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/catalog/MetadataColumn.java
 !????? /Users/dongjoon/APACHE/spark-merge/sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/catalog/SupportsMetadataColumns.java
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CI with the new rule.

Closes #30418 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-RAT.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-18 23:59:11 -08:00
Prakhar Jain 0b0fb70b09 [SPARK-33400][SQL] Normalize sameOrderExpressions in SortOrder to avoid unnecessary sort operations
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request tries to normalize the SortOrder properly to prevent unnecessary sort operators. Currently the sameOrderExpressions are not normalized as part of AliasAwareOutputOrdering.

Example: consider this join of three tables:

      """
        |SELECT t2id, t3.id as t3id
        |FROM (
        |    SELECT t1.id as t1id, t2.id as t2id
        |    FROM t1, t2
        |    WHERE t1.id = t2.id
        |) t12, t3
        |WHERE t1id = t3.id
      """.

The plan for this looks like:

      *(8) Project [t2id#1059L, id#1004L AS t3id#1060L]
      +- *(8) SortMergeJoin [t2id#1059L], [id#1004L], Inner
         :- *(5) Sort [t2id#1059L ASC NULLS FIRST ], false, 0         <-----------------------------
         :  +- *(5) Project [id#1000L AS t2id#1059L]
         :     +- *(5) SortMergeJoin [id#996L], [id#1000L], Inner
         :        :- *(2) Sort [id#996L ASC NULLS FIRST ], false, 0
         :        :  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#996L, 5), true, [id=#1426]
         :        :     +- *(1) Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
         :        +- *(4) Sort [id#1000L ASC NULLS FIRST ], false, 0
         :           +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#1000L, 5), true, [id=#1432]
         :              +- *(3) Range (0, 20, step=1, splits=2)
         +- *(7) Sort [id#1004L ASC NULLS FIRST ], false, 0
            +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#1004L, 5), true, [id=#1443]
               +- *(6) Range (0, 30, step=1, splits=2)

In this plan, the marked sort node could have been avoided as the data is already sorted on "t2.id" by the lower SortMergeJoin.

### Why are the changes needed?
To remove unneeded Sort operators.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.

Closes #30302 from prakharjain09/SPARK-33400-sortorder.

Authored-by: Prakhar Jain <prakharjain09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-19 06:25:37 +00:00
Yuming Wang 014e1fbb3a [SPARK-27421][SQL] Fix filter for int column and value class java.lang.String when pruning partition column
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr fix filter for int column and value class java.lang.String when pruning partition column.

How to reproduce this issue:
```scala
spark.sql("CREATE table test (name STRING) partitioned by (id int) STORED AS PARQUET")
spark.sql("CREATE VIEW test_view as select cast(id as string) as id, name from test")
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM test_view WHERE id = '0'").explain
```
```
20/11/15 06:19:01 INFO audit: ugi=root ip=unknown-ip-addr cmd=get_partitions_by_filter : db=default tbl=test
20/11/15 06:19:01 INFO MetaStoreDirectSql: Unable to push down SQL filter: Cannot push down filter for int column and value class java.lang.String
20/11/15 06:19:01 ERROR SparkSQLDriver: Failed in [SELECT * FROM test_view WHERE id = '0']
java.lang.RuntimeException: Caught Hive MetaException attempting to get partition metadata by filter from Hive. You can set the Spark configuration setting spark.sql.hive.manageFilesourcePartitions to false to work around this problem, however this will result in degraded performance. Please report a bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.Shim_v0_13.getPartitionsByFilter(HiveShim.scala:828)
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.$anonfun$getPartitionsByFilter$1(HiveClientImpl.scala:745)
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.$anonfun$withHiveState$1(HiveClientImpl.scala:294)
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.liftedTree1$1(HiveClientImpl.scala:227)
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.retryLocked(HiveClientImpl.scala:226)
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.withHiveState(HiveClientImpl.scala:276)
 at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.getPartitionsByFilter(HiveClientImpl.scala:743)
```

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix bug.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30380 from wangyum/SPARK-27421.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
2020-11-19 14:01:42 +08:00
yangjie01 e3058ba17c [SPARK-33441][BUILD] Add unused-imports compilation check and remove all unused-imports
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr add a new Scala compile arg to `pom.xml` to defense against new unused imports:

- `-Ywarn-unused-import` for Scala 2.12
- `-Wconf:cat=unused-imports:e` for Scala 2.13

The other fIles change are remove all unused imports in Spark code

### Why are the changes needed?
Cleanup code and add guarantee to defense against new unused imports

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action

Closes #30351 from LuciferYang/remove-imports-core-module.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-19 14:20:39 +09:00
Ryan Blue 66a76378cf
[SPARK-31255][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Add missing license headers
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add missing license headers for new files added in #28027.

### Why are the changes needed?

To fix licenses.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

This is a purely non-functional change.

Closes #30415 from rdblue/license-headers.

Authored-by: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-18 19:18:28 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh e518008ca9
[SPARK-33473][SQL] Extend interpreted subexpression elimination to other interpreted projections
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Similar to `InterpretedUnsafeProjection`, this patch proposes to extend interpreted subexpression elimination to `InterpretedMutableProjection` and `InterpretedSafeProjection`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Enabling subexpression elimination can improve the performance of interpreted projections, as shown in `InterpretedUnsafeProjection`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30406 from viirya/SPARK-33473.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-18 18:58:06 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 97d2cee4af [SPARK-33427][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Prevent test flakyness in SubExprEvaluationRuntimeSuite
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This followup is to prevent possible test flakyness of `SubExprEvaluationRuntimeSuite`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Because HashMap doesn't guarantee the order, in `proxyExpressions` the proxy expression id is not deterministic. So in `SubExprEvaluationRuntimeSuite` we should not test against it.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30414 from viirya/SPARK-33427-followup.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
2020-11-18 18:35:11 -08:00
Gengliang Wang 9a4c79073b [SPARK-33354][SQL] New explicit cast syntax rules in ANSI mode
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In section 6.13 of the ANSI SQL standard, there are syntax rules for valid combinations of the source and target data types.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/98212874-17356f80-1ef9-11eb-8f2b-385f32db404a.png)

Comparing the ANSI CAST syntax rules with the current default behavior of Spark:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/98789831-b7870a80-23b7-11eb-9b5f-469a42e0ee4a.png)

To make Spark's ANSI mode more ANSI SQL Compatible,I propose to disallow the following casting in ANSI mode:
```
TimeStamp <=> Boolean
Date <=> Boolean
Numeric <=> Timestamp
Numeric <=> Date
Numeric <=> Binary
String <=> Array
String <=> Map
String <=> Struct
```
The following castings are considered invalid in ANSI SQL standard, but they are quite straight forward. Let's Allow them for now
```
Numeric <=> Boolean
String <=> Binary
```
### Why are the changes needed?

Better ANSI SQL compliance

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the following castings will not be allowed in ANSI mode:
```
TimeStamp <=> Boolean
Date <=> Boolean
Numeric <=> Timestamp
Numeric <=> Date
Numeric <=> Binary
String <=> Array
String <=> Map
String <=> Struct
```

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test

The ANSI Compliance doc preview:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/98946017-2cd20880-24a8-11eb-8161-65749bfdd03a.png)

Closes #30260 from gengliangwang/ansiCanCast.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2020-11-19 09:23:36 +09:00
Ryan Blue 1df69f7e32 [SPARK-31255][SQL] Add SupportsMetadataColumns to DSv2
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This adds support for metadata columns to DataSourceV2. If a source implements `SupportsMetadataColumns` it must also implement `SupportsPushDownRequiredColumns` to support projecting those columns.

The analyzer is updated to resolve metadata columns from `LogicalPlan.metadataOutput`, and this adds a rule that will add metadata columns to the output of `DataSourceV2Relation` if one is used.

### Why are the changes needed?

This is the solution discussed for exposing additional data in the Kafka source. It is also needed for a generic `MERGE INTO` plan.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes. Users can project additional columns from sources that implement the new API. This also updates `DescribeTableExec` to show metadata columns.

### How was this patch tested?

Will include new unit tests.

Closes #28027 from rdblue/add-dsv2-metadata-columns.

Authored-by: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
2020-11-18 14:07:51 -08:00
Chao Sun 27cd945c15 [SPARK-32381][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] More cleanup on HadoopFSUtils
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a follow-up of #29471 and does the following improvements for `HadoopFSUtils`:
1. Removes the extra `filterFun` from the listing API and combines it with the `filter`.
2. Removes `SerializableBlockLocation` and `SerializableFileStatus` given that `BlockLocation` and `FileStatus` are already serializable.
3. Hides the `isRootLevel` flag from the top-level API.

### Why are the changes needed?

Main purpose is to simplify the logic within `HadoopFSUtils` as well as cleanup the API.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Existing unit tests (e.g., `FileIndexSuite`)

Closes #29959 from sunchao/hadoop-fs-utils-followup.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
2020-11-18 12:39:00 -08:00
Gengliang Wang a180e02842 [SPARK-32852][SQL][DOC][FOLLOWUP] Revise the documentation of spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881.
It revises the documentation of the configuration `spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix grammatical error in the doc.
Also, make it more clear that the configuration is effective only when `spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars` is set as `path`

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Just doc changes.

Closes #30407 from gengliangwang/reviseJarPathDoc.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
2020-11-18 22:09:40 +08:00
Bryan Cutler 8e2a0bdce7 [SPARK-24554][PYTHON][SQL] Add MapType support for PySpark with Arrow
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This change adds MapType support for PySpark with Arrow, if using pyarrow >= 2.0.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

MapType was previous unsupported with Arrow.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

User can now enable MapType for `createDataFrame()`, `toPandas()` with Arrow optimization, and with Pandas UDFs.

### How was this patch tested?

Added new PySpark tests for createDataFrame(), toPandas() and Scalar Pandas UDFs.

Closes #30393 from BryanCutler/arrow-add-MapType-SPARK-24554.

Authored-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-18 21:18:19 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 7f3d99a8a5 [MINOR][SQL][DOCS] Update schema_of_csv and schema_of_json doc
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This minor PR updates the docs of `schema_of_csv` and `schema_of_json`. They allow foldable string column instead of a string literal now.

### Why are the changes needed?

The function doc of  `schema_of_csv` and `schema_of_json` are not updated accordingly with previous PRs.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, update user-facing doc.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30396 from viirya/minor-json-csv.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-18 11:32:27 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 928348408e [SPARK-33427][SQL] Add subexpression elimination for interpreted expression evaluation
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch proposes to add subexpression elimination for interpreted expression evaluation. Interpreted expression evaluation is used when codegen was not able to work, for example complex schema.

### Why are the changes needed?

Currently we only do subexpression elimination for codegen. For some reasons, we may need to run interpreted expression evaluation. For example, codegen fails to compile and fallbacks to interpreted mode, or complex input/output schema of expressions. It is commonly seen for complex schema from expressions that is possibly caused by the query optimizer too, e.g. SPARK-32945.

We should also support subexpression elimination for interpreted evaluation. That could reduce performance difference when Spark fallbacks from codegen to interpreted expression evaluation, and improve Spark usability.

#### Benchmark

Update `SubExprEliminationBenchmark`:

Before:

```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_265-b01 on Mac OS X 10.15.6
 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU  2.60GHz
 from_json as subExpr:                      Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
subexpressionElimination on, codegen off           24707          25688         903          0.0   247068775.9       1.0X
```

After:
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_265-b01 on Mac OS X 10.15.6
 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU  2.60GHz
 from_json as subExpr:                      Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
subexpressionElimination on, codegen off            2360           2435          87          0.0    23604320.7      11.2X
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test. Benchmark manually.

Closes #30341 from viirya/SPARK-33427.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-17 14:29:37 +00:00
Yuming Wang 09bb9bedcd [SPARK-33416][SQL] Avoid Hive metastore stack overflow when InSet predicate have many values
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We [rewrite](5197c5d2e7/sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala (L722-L724)) `In`/`InSet` predicate to `or` expressions when pruning Hive partitions. That will cause Hive metastore stack over flow if there are a lot of values.

This pr rewrite `InSet` predicate to `GreaterThanOrEqual` min value and `LessThanOrEqual ` max value when pruning Hive partitions to avoid Hive metastore stack overflow.

From our experience, `spark.sql.hive.metastorePartitionPruningInSetThreshold` should be less than 10000.

### Why are the changes needed?

Avoid Hive metastore stack overflow when `InSet` predicate have many values.
Especially DPP, it may generate many values.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual test.

Closes #30325 from wangyum/SPARK-33416.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-17 13:47:01 +00:00
HyukjinKwon e2c7bfce40 [SPARK-33407][PYTHON] Simplify the exception message from Python UDFs (disabled by default)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to simplify the exception messages from Python UDFS.

Currently, the exception message from Python UDFs is as below:

```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf; spark.range(10).select(udf(lambda x: x/0)("id")).collect()
```

```python
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 427, in show
    print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20, vertical))
  File "/.../python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
  File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 127, in deco
    raise_from(converted)
  File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from
pyspark.sql.utils.PythonException:
  An exception was thrown from Python worker in the executor:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 605, in main
    process()
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 597, in process
    serializer.dump_stream(out_iter, outfile)
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 223, in dump_stream
    self.serializer.dump_stream(self._batched(iterator), stream)
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 141, in dump_stream
    for obj in iterator:
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 212, in _batched
    for item in iterator:
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 450, in mapper
    result = tuple(f(*[a[o] for o in arg_offsets]) for (arg_offsets, f) in udfs)
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 450, in <genexpr>
    result = tuple(f(*[a[o] for o in arg_offsets]) for (arg_offsets, f) in udfs)
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 90, in <lambda>
    return lambda *a: f(*a)
  File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/util.py", line 107, in wrapper
    return f(*args, **kwargs)
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <lambda>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero
```

Actually, almost all cases, users only care about `ZeroDivisionError: division by zero`. We don't really have to show the internal stuff in 99% cases.

This PR adds a configuration `spark.sql.execution.pyspark.udf.simplifiedException.enabled` (disabled by default) that hides the internal tracebacks related to Python worker, (de)serialization, etc.

```python
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 427, in show
    print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20, vertical))
  File "/.../python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
  File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 127, in deco
    raise_from(converted)
  File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from
pyspark.sql.utils.PythonException:
  An exception was thrown from Python worker in the executor:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <lambda>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero
```

The trackback will be shown from the point when any non-PySpark file is seen in the traceback.

### Why are the changes needed?

Without this configuration. such internal tracebacks are exposed to users directly especially for shall or notebook users in PySpark. 99% cases people don't care about the internal Python worker, (de)serialization and related tracebacks. It just makes the exception more difficult to read. For example, one statement of `x/0` above shows a very long traceback and most of them are unnecessary.

This configuration enables the ability to show simplified tracebacks which users will likely be most interested in.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

By default, no. It adds one configuration that simplifies the exception message. See the example above.

### How was this patch tested?

Manually tested:

```bash
$ pyspark --conf spark.sql.execution.pyspark.udf.simplifiedException.enabled=true
```
```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf; spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("FATAL"); spark.range(10).select(udf(lambda x: x/0)("id")).collect()
```

and unittests were also added.

Closes #30309 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33407.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-17 14:15:31 +09:00
Cheng Su 5af5aa146e [SPARK-33209][SS] Refactor unit test of stream-stream join in UnsupportedOperationsSuite
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a followup from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30076 to refactor unit test of stream-stream join in `UnsupportedOperationsSuite`, where we had a lot of duplicated code for stream-stream join unit test, for each join type.

### Why are the changes needed?

Help reduce duplicated code and make it easier for developers to read and add code in the future.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing unit test in `UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala` (pure refactoring).

Closes #30347 from c21/stream-test.

Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-17 11:18:42 +09:00
Prakhar Jain f5e3302840 [SPARK-33399][SQL] Normalize output partitioning and sortorder with respect to aliases to avoid unneeded exchange/sort nodes
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request tries to remove unneeded exchanges/sorts by normalizing the output partitioning and sortorder information correctly with respect to aliases.

Example: consider this join of three tables:

     |SELECT t2id, t3.id as t3id
     |FROM (
     |    SELECT t1.id as t1id, t2.id as t2id
     |    FROM t1, t2
     |    WHERE t1.id = t2.id
     |) t12, t3
     |WHERE t1id = t3.id

The plan for this looks like:

      *(9) Project [t2id#1034L, id#1004L AS t3id#1035L]
      +- *(9) SortMergeJoin [t1id#1033L], [id#1004L], Inner
         :- *(6) Sort [t1id#1033L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
         :  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(t1id#1033L, 5), true, [id=#1343]   <------------------------------
         :     +- *(5) Project [id#996L AS t1id#1033L, id#1000L AS t2id#1034L]
         :        +- *(5) SortMergeJoin [id#996L], [id#1000L], Inner
         :           :- *(2) Sort [id#996L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
         :           :  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#996L, 5), true, [id=#1329]
         :           :     +- *(1) Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
         :           +- *(4) Sort [id#1000L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
         :              +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#1000L, 5), true, [id=#1335]
         :                 +- *(3) Range (0, 20, step=1, splits=2)
         +- *(8) Sort [id#1004L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
            +- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#1004L, 5), true, [id=#1349]
               +- *(7) Range (0, 30, step=1, splits=2)

In this plan, the marked exchange could have been avoided as the data is already partitioned on "t1.id". This happens because AliasAwareOutputPartitioning class handles aliases only related to HashPartitioning. This change normalizes all output partitioning based on aliasing happening in Project.

### Why are the changes needed?
To remove unneeded exchanges.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.

On TPCDS 1000 scale, this change improves the performance of query 95 from 330 seconds to 170 seconds by removing the extra Exchange.

Closes #30300 from prakharjain09/SPARK-33399-outputpartitioning.

Authored-by: Prakhar Jain <prakharjain09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2020-11-17 10:35:43 +09:00
xuewei.linxuewei b5eca18af0 [SPARK-33460][SQL] Accessing map values should fail if key is not found
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Instead of returning NULL, throws runtime NoSuchElementException towards invalid key accessing in map-like functions, such as element_at, GetMapValue, when ANSI mode is on.

### Why are the changes needed?

For ANSI mode.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Added UT and Existing UT.

Closes #30386 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33460.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-16 16:14:31 +00:00
Max Gekk 6883f29465 [SPARK-33453][SQL][TESTS] Unify v1 and v2 SHOW PARTITIONS tests
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Move `SHOW PARTITIONS` parsing tests to `ShowPartitionsParserSuite`
2. Place Hive tests for `SHOW PARTITIONS` from `HiveCommandSuite` to the base test suite `v1.ShowPartitionsSuiteBase`. This will allow to run the tests w/ and w/o Hive.

The changes follow the approach of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30287.

### Why are the changes needed?
- The unification will allow to run common `SHOW PARTITIONS` tests for both DSv1 and Hive DSv1, DSv2
- We can detect missing features and differences between DSv1 and DSv2 implementations.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running:
- new test suites `build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *ShowPartitionsSuite"`
- and old one `build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveCommandSuite"`

Closes #30377 from MaxGekk/unify-dsv1_v2-show-partitions-tests.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-16 16:11:42 +00:00
luluorta dfa6fb46f4 [SPARK-33389][SQL] Make internal classes of SparkSession always using active SQLConf
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR makes internal classes of SparkSession always using active SQLConf. We should remove all `conf: SQLConf`s from ctor-parameters of this classes (`Analyzer`, `SparkPlanner`, `SessionCatalog`, `CatalogManager` `SparkSqlParser` and etc.) and use  `SQLConf.get` instead.

### Why are the changes needed?

Code refine.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing test

Closes #30299 from luluorta/SPARK-33389.

Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-16 15:27:18 +00:00
xuewei.linxuewei aa508fcc03 [SPARK-33140][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Revert code that not use passed-in SparkSession to get SQLConf
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Revert code that does not use passed-in SparkSession to get SQLConf in [SPARK-33140]. The change scope of [SPARK-33140] change passed-in SQLConf instance and place using SparkSession to get SQLConf to be unified to use SQLConf.get. And the code reverted in the patch, the passed-in SparkSession was not about to get SQLConf, but using its catalog, it's better to be consistent.

### Why are the changes needed?

Potential regression bug.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

Closes #30364 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33140.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-16 11:57:50 +00:00
Max Gekk 71a29b2eca [MINOR][SQL][DOCS] Fix a reference to spark.sql.sources.useV1SourceList
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace `spark.sql.sources.write.useV1SourceList` by `spark.sql.sources.useV1SourceList` in the comment for `CatalogManager.v2SessionCatalog()`.

### Why are the changes needed?
To have correct comments.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running `./dev/scalastyle`.

Closes #30385 from MaxGekk/fix-comment-useV1SourceList.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-16 17:57:20 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 10b011f837 [SPARK-33456][SQL][TEST][FOLLOWUP] Fix SUBEXPRESSION_ELIMINATION_ENABLED config name
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To fix wrong config name in `subexp-elimination.sql`.

### Why are the changes needed?

`CONFIG_DIM` should use config name's key.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30384 from viirya/SPARK-33456-followup.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-16 17:53:31 +09:00
Yuming Wang cdcbdaeb0d [SPARK-33458][SQL] Hive partition pruning support Contains, StartsWith and EndsWith predicate
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr add support Hive partition pruning on `Contains`, `StartsWith` and `EndsWith` predicate.

### Why are the changes needed?

Improve query performance.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30383 from wangyum/SPARK-33458.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-16 07:18:13 +00:00
Max Gekk 4e5d2e0695 [SPARK-33394][SQL][TESTS] Throw NoSuchNamespaceException for not existing namespace in InMemoryTableCatalog.listTables()
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Throw `NoSuchNamespaceException` in `listTables()` of the custom test catalog `InMemoryTableCatalog` if the passed namespace doesn't exist.

### Why are the changes needed?
1. To align behavior of V2 `InMemoryTableCatalog` to V1 session catalog.
2. To distinguish two situations:
    1. A namespace **does exist** but does not contain any tables. In that case, `listTables()` returns empty result.
    2. A namespace **does not exist**. `listTables()` throws `NoSuchNamespaceException` in this case.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. For example, `SHOW TABLES` returns empty result before the changes.

### How was this patch tested?
By running V1/V2 ShowTablesSuites.

Closes #30358 from MaxGekk/show-tables-in-not-existing-namespace.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-16 07:08:21 +00:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh d4cf1483fd [SPARK-33456][SQL][TEST] Add end-to-end test for subexpression elimination
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch proposes to add end-to-end test for subexpression elimination.

### Why are the changes needed?

We have subexpression elimination feature for expression evaluation but we don't have end-to-end tests for the feature. We should have one to make sure we don't break it.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

Closes #30381 from viirya/SPARK-33456.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-16 15:47:35 +09:00
artiship 1ae6d64b5f
[SPARK-33358][SQL] Return code when command process failed
Exit Spark SQL CLI processing loop if one of the commands (sub sql statement) process failed

This is a regression at Apache Spark 3.0.0.

```
$ cat 1.sql
select * from nonexistent_table;
select 2;
```

**Apache Spark 2.4.7**
```
spark-2.4.7-bin-hadoop2.7:$ bin/spark-sql -f 1.sql
20/11/15 16:14:38 WARN NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java classes where applicable
Error in query: Table or view not found: nonexistent_table; line 1 pos 14
```

**Apache Spark 3.0.1**
```
$ bin/spark-sql -f 1.sql
Error in query: Table or view not found: nonexistent_table; line 1 pos 14;
'Project [*]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation [nonexistent_table]

2
Time taken: 2.786 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```

**Apache Hive 1.2.2**
```
apache-hive-1.2.2-bin:$ bin/hive -f 1.sql

Logging initialized using configuration in jar:file:/Users/dongjoon/APACHE/hive-release/apache-hive-1.2.2-bin/lib/hive-common-1.2.2.jar!/hive-log4j.properties
FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10001]: Line 1:14 Table not found 'nonexistent_table'
```

Yes. This is a fix of regression.

Pass the UT.

Closes #30263 from artiship/SPARK-33358.

Authored-by: artiship <meilziner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-15 16:57:12 -08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh eea846b895
[SPARK-33455][SQL][TEST] Add SubExprEliminationBenchmark for benchmarking subexpression elimination
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch adds a benchmark `SubExprEliminationBenchmark` for benchmarking subexpression elimination feature.

### Why are the changes needed?

We need a benchmark for subexpression elimination feature for change such as #30341.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30379 from viirya/SPARK-33455.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-14 19:02:36 -08:00
luluorta 156704ba0d
[SPARK-33432][SQL] SQL parser should use active SQLConf
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR makes SQL parser using active SQLConf instead of the one in ctor-parameters.

### Why are the changes needed?

In ANSI mode, schema string parsing should fail if the schema uses ANSI reserved keyword as attribute name:

```scala
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.ansi.enabled", "true")
spark.sql("""select from_json('{"time":"26/10/2015"}', 'time Timestamp', map('timestampFormat',  'dd/MM/yyyy'));""").show
```

output:

> Cannot parse the data type:
> no viable alternative at input 'time'(line 1, pos 0)
>
> == SQL ==
> time Timestamp
> ^^^

But this query may accidentally succeed in certain cases cause the DataType parser sticks to the configs of the first created session in the current thread:

```scala
DataType.fromDDL("time Timestamp")
val newSpark = spark.newSession()
newSpark.conf.set("spark.sql.ansi.enabled", "true")
newSpark.sql("""select from_json('{"time":"26/10/2015"}', 'time Timestamp', map('timestampFormat', 'dd/MM/yyyy'));""").show
```

output:

> +--------------------------------+
> |from_json({"time":"26/10/2015"})|
> +--------------------------------+
> |                   {2015-10-26 00:00...|
> +--------------------------------+

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Newly and updated UTs

Closes #30357 from luluorta/SPARK-33432.

Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-14 13:37:12 -08:00
artiship 34a9a77ab5 [SPARK-33396][SQL] Spark SQL CLI prints appliction id when process file
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala to move ahead calling the cli.printMasterAndAppId method before process file.

### Why are the changes needed?
Even though in SPARK-25043 it has already brought in the printing application id feature. But the process file situation seems have not been included. This small change is to make spark-sql will also print out application id when process file.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
env

```
spark version: 3.0.1
os: centos 7
```

/tmp/tmp.sql

```sql
select 1;
```

submit command:

```sh
export HADOOP_USER_NAME=my-hadoop-user
bin/spark-sql  \
--master yarn \
--deploy-mode client \
--queue my.queue.name \
--conf spark.driver.host=$(hostname -i) \
--conf spark.app.name=spark-test  \
--name "spark-test" \
-f /tmp/tmp.sql
```

execution log:

```sh
20/11/09 23:18:39 WARN NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java classes where applicable
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN HiveConf: HiveConf of name hive.spark.client.rpc.server.address.use.ip does not exist
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN HiveConf: HiveConf of name hive.spark.client.submit.timeout.interval does not exist
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN HiveConf: HiveConf of name hive.enforce.bucketing does not exist
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN HiveConf: HiveConf of name hive.server2.enable.impersonation does not exist
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN HiveConf: HiveConf of name hive.run.timeout.seconds does not exist
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN HiveConf: HiveConf of name hive.support.sql11.reserved.keywords does not exist
20/11/09 23:18:40 WARN DomainSocketFactory: The short-circuit local reads feature cannot be used because libhadoop cannot be loaded.
20/11/09 23:18:41 WARN SparkConf: Note that spark.local.dir will be overridden by the value set by the cluster manager (via SPARK_LOCAL_DIRS in mesos/standalone/kubernetes and LOCAL_DIRS in YARN).
20/11/09 23:18:42 WARN Client: Neither spark.yarn.jars nor spark.yarn.archive is set, falling back to uploading libraries under SPARK_HOME.
20/11/09 23:18:52 WARN YarnSchedulerBackend$YarnSchedulerEndpoint: Attempted to request executors before the AM has registered!

Spark master: yarn, Application Id: application_1567136266901_27355775
1
1
Time taken: 4.974 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)

```

Closes #30301 from artiship/SPARK-33396.

Authored-by: artiship <meilziner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
2020-11-14 20:54:17 +08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 0046222a75
[SPARK-33337][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Prevent possible flakyness in SubexpressionEliminationSuite
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a simple followup to prevent test flakyness in SubexpressionEliminationSuite. If `getAllEquivalentExprs` returns more than 1 sequences, due to HashMap, we should use `contains` instead of assuming the order of results.

### Why are the changes needed?

Prevent test flakyness in SubexpressionEliminationSuite.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev only.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30371 from viirya/SPARK-33337-followup.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-13 15:10:02 -08:00
xuewei.linxuewei 234711a328 Revert "[SPARK-33139][SQL] protect setActionSession and clearActiveSession"
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In [SPARK-33139] we defined `setActionSession` and `clearActiveSession` as deprecated API, it turns out it is widely used, and after discussion, even if without this PR, it should work with unify view feature, it might only be a risk if user really abuse using these two API. So revert the PR is needed.

[SPARK-33139] has two commit, include a follow up. Revert them both.

### Why are the changes needed?

Revert.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

Closes #30367 from leanken/leanken-revert-SPARK-33139.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-13 13:35:45 +00:00
Kent Yao cdd8e51742 [SPARK-33419][SQL] Unexpected behavior when using SET commands before a query in SparkSession.sql
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

SparkSession.sql converts a string value to a DataFrame, and the string value should be one single SQL statement ending up w/ or w/o one or more semicolons. e.g.

```sql
scala> spark.sql(" select 2").show
+---+
|  2|
+---+
|  2|
+---+
scala> spark.sql(" select 2;").show
+---+
|  2|
+---+
|  2|
+---+

scala> spark.sql(" select 2;;;;").show
+---+
|  2|
+---+
|  2|
+---+
```
If we put 2 or more statements in, it fails in the parser as expected, e.g.

```sql
scala> spark.sql(" select 2; select 1;").show
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
extraneous input 'select' expecting {<EOF>, ';'}(line 1, pos 11)

== SQL ==
 select 2; select 1;
-----------^^^

  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException.withCommand(ParseDriver.scala:263)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parse(ParseDriver.scala:130)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlParser.parse(SparkSqlParser.scala:51)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parsePlan(ParseDriver.scala:81)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$2(SparkSession.scala:610)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.QueryPlanningTracker.measurePhase(QueryPlanningTracker.scala:111)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$1(SparkSession.scala:610)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:769)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:607)
  ... 47 elided
```

As a very generic user scenario, users may want to change some settings before they execute
the queries. They may pass a string value like `set spark.sql.abc=2; select 1;` into this API, which creates a confusing gap between the actual effect and the user's expectations.

The user may want the query to be executed with spark.sql.abc=2, but Spark actually treats the whole part of `2; select 1;` as the value of the property 'spark.sql.abc',
e.g.

```
scala> spark.sql("set spark.sql.abc=2; select 1;").show
+-------------+------------+
|          key|       value|
+-------------+------------+
|spark.sql.abc|2; select 1;|
+-------------+------------+
```

What's more, the SET symbol could digest everything behind it, which makes it unstable from version to version, e.g.

#### 3.1
```sql
scala> spark.sql("set;").show
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
Expected format is 'SET', 'SET key', or 'SET key=value'. If you want to include special characters in key, please use quotes, e.g., SET `ke y`=value.(line 1, pos 0)

== SQL ==
set;
^^^

  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlAstBuilder.$anonfun$visitSetConfiguration$1(SparkSqlParser.scala:83)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParserUtils$.withOrigin(ParserUtils.scala:113)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlAstBuilder.visitSetConfiguration(SparkSqlParser.scala:72)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlAstBuilder.visitSetConfiguration(SparkSqlParser.scala:58)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.SqlBaseParser$SetConfigurationContext.accept(SqlBaseParser.java:2161)
  at org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.AbstractParseTreeVisitor.visit(AbstractParseTreeVisitor.java:18)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AstBuilder.$anonfun$visitSingleStatement$1(AstBuilder.scala:77)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParserUtils$.withOrigin(ParserUtils.scala:113)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AstBuilder.visitSingleStatement(AstBuilder.scala:77)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.$anonfun$parsePlan$1(ParseDriver.scala:82)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parse(ParseDriver.scala:113)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlParser.parse(SparkSqlParser.scala:51)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parsePlan(ParseDriver.scala:81)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$2(SparkSession.scala:610)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.QueryPlanningTracker.measurePhase(QueryPlanningTracker.scala:111)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$1(SparkSession.scala:610)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:769)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:607)
  ... 47 elided

scala> spark.sql("set a;").show
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
Expected format is 'SET', 'SET key', or 'SET key=value'. If you want to include special characters in key, please use quotes, e.g., SET `ke y`=value.(line 1, pos 0)

== SQL ==
set a;
^^^

  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlAstBuilder.$anonfun$visitSetConfiguration$1(SparkSqlParser.scala:83)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParserUtils$.withOrigin(ParserUtils.scala:113)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlAstBuilder.visitSetConfiguration(SparkSqlParser.scala:72)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlAstBuilder.visitSetConfiguration(SparkSqlParser.scala:58)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.SqlBaseParser$SetConfigurationContext.accept(SqlBaseParser.java:2161)
  at org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.AbstractParseTreeVisitor.visit(AbstractParseTreeVisitor.java:18)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AstBuilder.$anonfun$visitSingleStatement$1(AstBuilder.scala:77)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParserUtils$.withOrigin(ParserUtils.scala:113)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AstBuilder.visitSingleStatement(AstBuilder.scala:77)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.$anonfun$parsePlan$1(ParseDriver.scala:82)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parse(ParseDriver.scala:113)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlParser.parse(SparkSqlParser.scala:51)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parsePlan(ParseDriver.scala:81)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$2(SparkSession.scala:610)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.QueryPlanningTracker.measurePhase(QueryPlanningTracker.scala:111)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$1(SparkSession.scala:610)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:769)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:607)
  ... 47 elided
```

#### 2.4

```sql
scala> spark.sql("set;").show
+---+-----------+
|key|      value|
+---+-----------+
|  ;|<undefined>|
+---+-----------+

scala> spark.sql("set a;").show
+---+-----------+
|key|      value|
+---+-----------+
| a;|<undefined>|
+---+-----------+
```

In this PR,
1.  make `set spark.sql.abc=2; select 1;` in `SparkSession.sql` fail directly, user should call `.sql` for each statement separately.
2. make the semicolon as the separator of statements, and if users want to use it as part of the property value, shall use quotes too.

### Why are the changes needed?

1. disambiguation for  `SparkSession.sql`
2. make semicolon work same both w/ `SET` and other statements

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

yes,
the semicolon works as a separator of statements now, it will be trimmed if it is at the end of the statement and fail the statement if it is in the middle. you need to use quotes if you want it to be part of the property value

### How was this patch tested?

new tests

Closes #30332 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33419.

Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-13 06:58:16 +00:00
ulysses 82a21d2a3e [SPARK-33433][SQL] Change Aggregate max rows to 1 if grouping is empty
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Change `Aggregate` max rows to 1 if grouping is empty.

### Why are the changes needed?

If `Aggregate` grouping is empty, the result is always one row.

Then we don't need push down limit in `LimitPushDown` with such case
```
select count(*) from t1
union
select count(*) from t2
limit 1
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Closes #30356 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33433.

Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2020-11-13 15:57:07 +09:00
Max Gekk 539c2deb89 [SPARK-33426][SQL][TESTS] Unify Hive SHOW TABLES tests
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Create the separate test suite `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.command.ShowTablesSuite`.
2. Re-use V1 SHOW TABLES tests added by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30287 in the Hive test suites.
3. Add new test case for the pattern `'table_name_1*|table_name_2*'` in the common test suite.

### Why are the changes needed?
To test V1 + common  SHOW TABLES tests in Hive.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running v1/v2 and Hive v1 `ShowTablesSuite`:
```
$  build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *ShowTablesSuite"
```

Closes #30340 from MaxGekk/show-tables-hive-tests.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-13 05:15:13 +00:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 2c64b731ae
[SPARK-33259][SS] Disable streaming query with possible correctness issue by default
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch proposes to disable the streaming query with possible correctness issue in chained stateful operators. The behavior can be controlled by a SQL config, so if users understand the risk and still want to run the query, they can disable the check.

### Why are the changes needed?

The possible correctness in chained stateful operators in streaming query is not straightforward for users. From users perspective, it will be considered as a Spark bug. It is also possible the worse case, users are not aware of the correctness issue and use wrong results.

A better approach should be to disable such queries and let users choose to run the query if they understand there is such risk, instead of implicitly running the query and let users to find out correctness issue by themselves and report this known to Spark community.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes. Streaming query with possible correctness issue will be blocked to run, except for users explicitly disable the SQL config.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30210 from viirya/SPARK-33259.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-12 15:31:57 -08:00
Chao Sun cf3b6551ce
[SPARK-33435][SQL] DSv2: REFRESH TABLE should invalidate caches referencing the table
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This changes `RefreshTableExec` in DSv2 to also invalidate caches with references to the target table to be refreshed. The change itself is similar to what's done in #30211. Note that though, since we currently don't support caching a DSv2 table directly, this doesn't add recache logic as in the DSv1 impl. I marked it as a TODO for now.

### Why are the changes needed?

Currently the behavior in DSv1 and DSv2 is inconsistent w.r.t refreshing table: in DSv1 we invalidate both metadata cache as well as all table caches that are related to the table, but in DSv2 we only do the former. This addresses the issue and make the behavior consistent.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, now refreshing a v2 table also invalidate all the related caches.

### How was this patch tested?

Added a new UT.

Closes #30359 from sunchao/SPARK-33435.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-12 15:22:56 -08:00
Linhong Liu 1baf0d5c9b [SPARK-33140][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] change val to def in object rule
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In #30097, many rules changed from case class to object, but if the rule
is stateful, there will be a problem. For example, if an object rule uses a
`val` to refer to a config, it will be unchanged after initialization even if
other spark session uses a different config value.

### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid potential bug

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT

Closes #30354 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-33140-followup-2.

Lead-authored-by: Linhong Liu <67896261+linhongliu-db@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-13 01:10:28 +09:00
gengjiaan 2f07c56810 [SPARK-33278][SQL] Improve the performance for FIRST_VALUE
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29800 provides a performance improvement for `NTH_VALUE`.
`FIRST_VALUE` also could use the `UnboundedOffsetWindowFunctionFrame` and `UnboundedPrecedingOffsetWindowFunctionFrame`.

### Why are the changes needed?
Improve the performance for `FIRST_VALUE`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
 'No'.

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.

Closes #30178 from beliefer/SPARK-33278.

Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-12 14:59:22 +00:00
ulysses a3d2954662 [SPARK-33421][SQL] Support Greatest and Least in Expression Canonicalize
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add `Greatest` and `Least` check in `Canonicalize`.

### Why are the changes needed?

The children of both `Greatest` and `Least` are order Irrelevant.

Let's say we have `greatest(1, 2)` and `greatest(2, 1)`. We can get the same canonicalized expression in this case.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Closes #30330 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33421.

Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-12 20:26:33 +09:00
xuewei.linxuewei 6d31daeb6a [SPARK-33386][SQL] Accessing array elements in ElementAt/Elt/GetArrayItem should failed if index is out of bound
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Instead of returning NULL, throws runtime ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when ansiMode is enable for `element_at`,`elt`, `GetArrayItem` functions.

### Why are the changes needed?

For ansiMode.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

When `spark.sql.ansi.enabled` = true, Spark will throw `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException` if out-of-range index when accessing array elements

### How was this patch tested?

Added UT and existing UT.

Closes #30297 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33386.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-12 08:50:32 +00:00
Yuanjian Li 9f983a68f1 [SPARK-30294][SS][FOLLOW-UP] Directly override RDD methods
### Why are the changes needed?
Follow the comment: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26935#discussion_r514697997

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Existing test and Mima test.

Closes #30344 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30294-follow.

Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <yuanjian.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-12 12:22:25 +09:00
Max Gekk 7e867298fe
[SPARK-33404][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Update benchmark results for date_trunc
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated results of `DateTimeBenchmark` in the environment:

| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) |
| AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) |
| Java | OpenJDK8/11 installed by`sudo add-apt-repository ppa:openjdk-r/ppa` & `sudo apt install openjdk-11-jdk`|

### Why are the changes needed?
The fix https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30303 slowed down `date_trunc`. This PR updates benchmark results to have actual info about performance of `date_trunc`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By regenerating benchmark results:
```
$ SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark"
```

Closes #30338 from MaxGekk/fix-trunc_date-benchmark.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-11 08:50:43 -08:00
stczwd 1eb236b936 [SPARK-32512][SQL] add alter table add/drop partition command for datasourcev2
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is trying to add `AlterTableAddPartitionExec` and `AlterTableDropPartitionExec` with the new table partition API, defined in #28617.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. User can use `alter table add partition` or `alter table drop partition` to create/drop partition in V2Table.

### How was this patch tested?
Run suites and fix old tests.

Closes #29339 from stczwd/SPARK-32512-new.

Lead-authored-by: stczwd <qcsd2011@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacky Lee <qcsd2011@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jackey Lee <qcsd2011@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-11 09:30:42 +00:00
Wenchen Fan 8760032f4f [SPARK-33412][SQL] OverwriteByExpression should resolve its delete condition based on the table relation not the input query
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make a special case in `ResolveReferences`, which resolves `OverwriteByExpression`'s condition expression based on the table relation instead of the input query.

### Why are the changes needed?

The condition expression is passed to the table implementation at the end, so we should resolve it using table schema. Previously it works because we have a hack in `ResolveReferences` to delay the resolution if `outputResolved == false`. However, this hack doesn't work for tables accepting any schema like https://github.com/delta-io/delta/pull/521 . We may wrongly resolve the delete condition using input query's outout columns which don't match the table column names.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

existing tests and updated test in v2 write.

Closes #30318 from cloud-fan/v2-write.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-11 16:13:21 +09:00
Takeshi Yamamuro 4b367976a8 [SPARK-33417][SQL][TEST] Correct the behaviour of query filters in TPCDSQueryBenchmark
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR intends to fix the behaviour of query filters in `TPCDSQueryBenchmark`. We can use an option `--query-filter` for selecting TPCDS queries to run, e.g., `--query-filter q6,q8,q13`. But, the current master has a weird behaviour about the option. For example, if we pass `--query-filter q6` so as to run the TPCDS q6 only, `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` runs `q6` and `q6-v2.7` because the `filterQueries` method does not respect the name suffix. So, there is no way now to run the TPCDS q6 only.

### Why are the changes needed?

Bugfix.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Manually checked.

Closes #30324 from maropu/FilterBugInTPCDSQueryBenchmark.

Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2020-11-11 15:24:05 +09:00
Terry Kim 6d5d030957 [SPARK-33414][SQL] Migrate SHOW CREATE TABLE command to use UnresolvedTableOrView to resolve the identifier
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to migrate `SHOW CREATE TABLE` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).

Note that `SHOW CREATE TABLE` works only with a v1 table and a permanent view, and not supported for v2 tables.

### Why are the changes needed?

The changes allow consistent resolution behavior when resolving the table identifier. For example, the following is the current behavior:
```scala
sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW t AS SELECT 1")
sql("CREATE DATABASE db")
sql("CREATE TABLE t (key INT, value STRING) USING hive")
sql("USE db")
sql("SHOW CREATE TABLE t AS SERDE") // Succeeds
```
With this change, `SHOW CREATE TABLE ... AS SERDE` above fails with the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: t is a temp view not table or permanent view.; line 1 pos 0
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveTempViews$$anonfun$apply$7.$anonfun$applyOrElse$43(Analyzer.scala:883)
  at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:230)
```
, which is expected since temporary view is resolved first and `SHOW CREATE TABLE ... AS SERDE` doesn't support a temporary view.

Note that there is no behavior change for `SHOW CREATE TABLE` without `AS SERDE` since it was already resolving to a temporary view first. See below for more detail.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

After this PR, `SHOW CREATE TABLE t AS SERDE` is resolved to a temp view `t` instead of table `db.t` in the above scenario.

Note that there is no behavior change for `SHOW CREATE TABLE` without `AS SERDE`, but the exception message changes from `SHOW CREATE TABLE is not supported on a temporary view` to `t is a temp view not table or permanent view`.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing tests.

Closes #30321 from imback82/show_create_table.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-11 05:54:27 +00:00
Max Gekk 1e2eeda20e [SPARK-33382][SQL][TESTS] Unify datasource v1 and v2 SHOW TABLES tests
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to gather common `SHOW TABLES` tests into one trait `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.ShowTablesSuite`, and put datasource specific tests to the `v1.ShowTablesSuite` and `v2.ShowTablesSuite`. Also tests for parsing `SHOW TABLES` are extracted to `ShowTablesParserSuite`.

### Why are the changes needed?
- The unification will allow to run common `SHOW TABLES` tests for both DSv1 and DSv2
- We can detect missing features and differences between DSv1 and DSv2 implementations.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running new test suites:
- `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.v1.ShowTablesSuite`
- `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.v2.ShowTablesSuite`
- `ShowTablesParserSuite`

Closes #30287 from MaxGekk/unify-dsv1_v2-tests.

Lead-authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-11 05:26:46 +00:00
ulysses 5197c5d2e7 [SPARK-33390][SQL] Make Literal support char array
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make Literal support char array.

### Why are the changes needed?

We always use `Literal()` to create foldable value, and `char[]` is a usual data type. We can make it easy that support create String Literal with `char[]`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, user can call `Literal()` with `char[]`.

### How was this patch tested?

Add test.

Closes #30295 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33390.

Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-11 11:39:11 +09:00
Utkarsh 46346943bb [SPARK-33404][SQL] Fix incorrect results in date_trunc expression
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following query produces incorrect results:
```
SELECT date_trunc('minute', '1769-10-17 17:10:02')
```
Spark currently incorrectly returns
```
1769-10-17 17:10:02
```
against the expected return value of
```
1769-10-17 17:10:00
```
**Steps to repro**
Run the following commands in spark-shell:
```
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
spark.sql("SELECT date_trunc('minute', '1769-10-17 17:10:02')").show()
```
This happens as `truncTimestamp` in package `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.DateTimeUtils` incorrectly assumes that time zone offsets can never have the granularity of a second and thus does not account for time zone adjustment when truncating the given timestamp to `minute`.
This assumption is currently used when truncating the timestamps to `microsecond, millisecond, second, or minute`.

This PR fixes this issue and always uses time zone knowledge when truncating timestamps regardless of the truncation unit.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests to `DateTimeUtilsSuite` which previously failed and pass now.

Closes #30303 from utkarsh39/trunc-timestamp-fix.

Authored-by: Utkarsh <utkarsh.agarwal@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2020-11-11 09:28:59 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 6fa80ed1dd [SPARK-33337][SQL] Support subexpression elimination in branches of conditional expressions
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently we skip subexpression elimination in branches of conditional expressions including `If`, `CaseWhen`, and `Coalesce`. Actually we can do subexpression elimination for such branches if the subexpression is common across all branches. This patch proposes to support subexpression elimination in branches of conditional expressions.

### Why are the changes needed?

We may miss subexpression elimination chances in branches of conditional expressions. This kind of subexpression is frequently seen. It may be written manually by users or come from query optimizer. For example, project collapsing could embed expressions between two `Project`s and produces conditional expression like:

```
CASE WHEN jsonToStruct(json).a = '1' THEN 1.0 WHEN jsonToStruct(json).a = '2' THEN 2.0 ... ELSE 1.2 END
```

If `jsonToStruct(json)` is time-expensive expression, we don't eliminate the duplication and waste time on running it repeatedly now.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30245 from viirya/SPARK-33337.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
2020-11-10 16:17:00 -08:00
Chao Sun 3165ca742a [SPARK-33376][SQL] Remove the option of "sharesHadoopClasses" in Hive IsolatedClientLoader
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This removes the `sharesHadoopClasses` flag from `IsolatedClientLoader` in Hive module.

### Why are the changes needed?

Currently, when initializing `IsolatedClientLoader`, users can set the `sharesHadoopClasses` flag to decide whether the `HiveClient` created should share Hadoop classes with Spark itself or not. In the latter case, the client will only load Hadoop classes from the Hive dependencies.

There are two reasons to remove this:
1. this feature is currently used in two cases: 1) unit tests, 2) when the Hadoop version defined in Maven can not be found when `spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars` is equal to "maven", which could be very rare.
2. when `sharesHadoopClasses` is false, Spark doesn't really only use Hadoop classes from Hive jars: we also download `hadoop-client` jar and put all the sub-module jars (e.g., `hadoop-common`, `hadoop-hdfs`) together with the Hive jars, and the Hadoop version used by `hadoop-client` is the same version used by Spark itself. As result, we're mixing two versions of Hadoop jars in the classpath, which could potentially cause issues, especially considering that the default Hadoop version is already 3.2.0 while most Hive versions supported by the `IsolatedClientLoader` is still using Hadoop 2.x or even lower.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

This affects Spark users in one scenario: when `spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars` is set to `maven` AND the Hadoop version specified in pom file cannot be downloaded, currently the behavior is to switch to _not_ share Hadoop classes, but with the PR it will share Hadoop classes with Spark.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing UTs.

Closes #30284 from sunchao/SPARK-33376.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 15:41:04 +00:00
angerszhu 34f5e7ce77 [SPARK-33302][SQL] Push down filters through Expand
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Push down filter through expand.  For case below:
```
create table t1(pid int, uid int, sid int, dt date, suid int) using parquet;
create table t2(pid int, vs int, uid int, csid int) using parquet;

SELECT
       years,
       appversion,
       SUM(uusers) AS users
FROM   (SELECT
               Date_trunc('year', dt)          AS years,
               CASE
                 WHEN h.pid = 3 THEN 'iOS'
                 WHEN h.pid = 4 THEN 'Android'
                 ELSE 'Other'
               END                             AS viewport,
               h.vs                            AS appversion,
               Count(DISTINCT u.uid)           AS uusers
               ,Count(DISTINCT u.suid)         AS srcusers
        FROM   t1 u
               join t2 h
                 ON h.uid = u.uid
        GROUP  BY 1,
                  2,
                  3) AS a
WHERE  viewport = 'iOS'
GROUP  BY 1,
          2
```

Plan. before this pr:
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(5) HashAggregate(keys=[years#30, appversion#32], functions=[sum(uusers#33L)])
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(years#30, appversion#32, 200), true, [id=#251]
   +- *(4) HashAggregate(keys=[years#30, appversion#32], functions=[partial_sum(uusers#33L)])
      +- *(4) HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12], functions=[count(if ((gid#44 = 1)) u.`uid`#47 else null)])
         +- Exchange hashpartitioning(date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12, 200), true, [id=#246]
            +- *(3) HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12], functions=[partial_count(if ((gid#44 = 1)) u.`uid`#47 else null)])
               +- *(3) HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12, u.`uid`#47, u.`suid`#48, gid#44], functions=[])
                  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12, u.`uid`#47, u.`suid`#48, gid#44, 200), true, [id=#241]
                     +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12, u.`uid`#47, u.`suid`#48, gid#44], functions=[])
                        +- *(2) Filter (CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46 = iOS)
                           +- *(2) Expand [ArrayBuffer(date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(Etc/GMT+7)), CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END, vs#12, uid#7, null, 1), ArrayBuffer(date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(Etc/GMT+7)), CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END, vs#12, null, suid#10, 2)], [date_trunc('year', CAST(u.`dt` AS TIMESTAMP))#45, CASE WHEN (h.`pid` = 3) THEN 'iOS' WHEN (h.`pid` = 4) THEN 'Android' ELSE 'Other' END#46, vs#12, u.`uid`#47, u.`suid`#48, gid#44]
                              +- *(2) Project [uid#7, dt#9, suid#10, pid#11, vs#12]
                                 +- *(2) BroadcastHashJoin [uid#7], [uid#13], Inner, BuildRight
                                    :- *(2) Project [uid#7, dt#9, suid#10]
                                    :  +- *(2) Filter isnotnull(uid#7)
                                    :     +- *(2) ColumnarToRow
                                    :        +- FileScan parquet default.t1[uid#7,dt#9,suid#10] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(uid#7)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/root/spark-3.0.0-bin-hadoop3.2/spark-warehouse/t1], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(uid)], ReadSchema: struct<uid:int,dt:date,suid:int>
                                    +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[2, int, true] as bigint))), [id=#233]
                                       +- *(1) Project [pid#11, vs#12, uid#13]
                                          +- *(1) Filter isnotnull(uid#13)
                                             +- *(1) ColumnarToRow
                                                +- FileScan parquet default.t2[pid#11,vs#12,uid#13] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(uid#13)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/root/spark-3.0.0-bin-hadoop3.2/spark-warehouse/t2], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(uid)], ReadSchema: struct<pid:int,vs:int,uid:int>
```

Plan. after. this pr. :
```
== Physical Plan ==
AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=false
+- HashAggregate(keys=[years#0, appversion#2], functions=[sum(uusers#3L)], output=[years#0, appversion#2, users#5L])
   +- Exchange hashpartitioning(years#0, appversion#2, 5), true, [id=#71]
      +- HashAggregate(keys=[years#0, appversion#2], functions=[partial_sum(uusers#3L)], output=[years#0, appversion#2, sum#22L])
         +- HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12], functions=[count(distinct uid#7)], output=[years#0, appversion#2, uusers#3L])
            +- Exchange hashpartitioning(date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, 5), true, [id=#67]
               +- HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12], functions=[partial_count(distinct uid#7)], output=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, count#27L])
                  +- HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, uid#7], functions=[], output=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, uid#7])
                     +- Exchange hashpartitioning(date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, uid#7, 5), true, [id=#63]
                        +- HashAggregate(keys=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles)) AS date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END AS CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, uid#7], functions=[], output=[date_trunc(year, cast(dt#9 as timestamp), Some(America/Los_Angeles))#23, CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END#24, vs#12, uid#7])
                           +- Project [uid#7, dt#9, pid#11, vs#12]
                              +- BroadcastHashJoin [uid#7], [uid#13], Inner, BuildRight, false
                                 :- Filter isnotnull(uid#7)
                                 :  +- FileScan parquet default.t1[uid#7,dt#9] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(uid#7)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/private/var/folders/4l/7_c5c97s1_gb0d9_d6shygx00000gn/T/warehouse-c069d87..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(uid)], ReadSchema: struct<uid:int,dt:date>
                                 +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[2, int, false] as bigint)),false), [id=#58]
                                    +- Filter ((CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END = iOS) AND isnotnull(uid#13))
                                       +- FileScan parquet default.t2[pid#11,vs#12,uid#13] Batched: true, DataFilters: [(CASE WHEN (pid#11 = 3) THEN iOS WHEN (pid#11 = 4) THEN Android ELSE Other END = iOS), isnotnull..., Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/private/var/folders/4l/7_c5c97s1_gb0d9_d6shygx00000gn/T/warehouse-c069d87..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(uid)], ReadSchema: struct<pid:int,vs:int,uid:int>

```

### Why are the changes needed?
Improve  performance, filter more data.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Added UT

Closes #30278 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-33302.

Authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 14:40:24 +00:00
Chao Sun 4934da56bc [SPARK-33305][SQL] DSv2: DROP TABLE command should also invalidate cache
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This changes `DropTableExec` to also invalidate caches referencing the table to be dropped, in a cascading manner.

### Why are the changes needed?

In DSv1, `DROP TABLE` command also invalidate caches as described in [SPARK-19765](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19765). However in DSv2 the same command only drops the table but doesn't handle the caches. This could lead to correctness issue.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes. Now DSv2 `DROP TABLE` command also invalidates cache.

### How was this patch tested?

Added a new UT

Closes #30211 from sunchao/SPARK-33305.

Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 14:37:42 +00:00
xuewei.linxuewei e3a768dd79 [SPARK-33391][SQL] element_at with CreateArray not respect one based index
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

element_at with CreateArray not respect one based index.

repo step:

```
var df = spark.sql("select element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 0)")
df.printSchema()

df = spark.sql("select element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 1)")
df.printSchema()

df = spark.sql("select element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 2)")
df.printSchema()

df = spark.sql("select element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 3)")
df.printSchema()

root
– element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 0): integer (nullable = false)

root
– element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 1): integer (nullable = false)

root
– element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 2): integer (nullable = false)

root
– element_at(array(3, 2, 1), 3): integer (nullable = true)

correct answer should be
0 true which is outOfBounds return default true.
1 false
2 false
3 false

```

For expression eval, it respect the oneBasedIndex, but within checking the nullable, it calculates with zeroBasedIndex using `computeNullabilityFromArray`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Correctness issue.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Added UT and existing UT.

Closes #30296 from leanken/leanken-SPARK-33391.

Authored-by: xuewei.linxuewei <xuewei.linxuewei@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 07:23:47 +00:00
Yuanjian Li ad02ceda29 [SPARK-33244][SQL] Unify the code paths for spark.table and spark.read.table
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Call `spark.read.table` in `spark.table`.
- Add comments for `spark.table` to emphasize it also support streaming temp view reading.

### Why are the changes needed?
The code paths of `spark.table` and `spark.read.table` should be the same. This behavior is broke in SPARK-32592 since we need to respect options in `spark.read.table` API.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.

Closes #30148 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-33244.

Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <yuanjian.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 05:46:45 +00:00
Terry Kim 90f6f39e42 [SPARK-33366][SQL] Migrate LOAD DATA command to use UnresolvedTable to resolve the identifier
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to migrate `LOAD DATA` to use `UnresolvedTable` to resolve the table identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).

Note that `LOAD DATA` is not supported for v2 tables.

### Why are the changes needed?

The changes allow consistent resolution behavior when resolving the table identifier. For example, the following is the current behavior:
```scala
sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW t AS SELECT 1")
sql("CREATE DATABASE db")
sql("CREATE TABLE t (key INT, value STRING) USING hive")
sql("USE db")
sql("LOAD DATA LOCAL INPATH 'examples/src/main/resources/kv1.txt' INTO TABLE t") // Succeeds
```
With this change, `LOAD DATA` above fails with the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: t is a temp view not table.; line 1 pos 0
    at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
    at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveTempViews$$anonfun$apply$7.$anonfun$applyOrElse$39(Analyzer.scala:865)
    at scala.Option.foreach(Option.scala:407)
```
, which is expected since temporary view is resolved first and `LOAD DATA` doesn't support a temporary view.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

After this PR, `LOAD DATA ... t` is resolved to a temp view `t` instead of table `db.t` in the above scenario.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated existing tests.

Closes #30270 from imback82/load_data_cmd.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 05:28:06 +00:00
Gengliang Wang a1f84d8714 [SPARK-33369][SQL] DSV2: Skip schema inference in write if table provider supports external metadata
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When TableProvider.supportsExternalMetadata() is true, Spark will use the input Dataframe's schema in `DataframeWriter.save()`/`DataStreamWriter.start()` and skip schema/partitioning inference.

### Why are the changes needed?

For all the v2 data sources which are not FileDataSourceV2, Spark always infers the table schema/partitioning on `DataframeWriter.save()`/`DataStreamWriter.start()`.
The inference of table schema/partitioning can be expensive. However, there is no such trait or flag for indicating a V2 source can use the input DataFrame's schema on `DataframeWriter.save()`/`DataStreamWriter.start()`. We can resolve the problem by adding a new expected behavior for the method `TableProvider.supportsExternalMetadata()`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, a new behavior for the data source v2 API `TableProvider.supportsExternalMetadata()` when it returns true.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Closes #30273 from gengliangwang/supportsExternalMetadata.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-10 04:43:32 +00:00
Gabor Somogyi 4ac8133866 [SPARK-33223][SS][UI] Structured Streaming Web UI state information
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Structured Streaming UI is not containing state information. In this PR I've added it.

### Why are the changes needed?
Missing state information.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Additional UI elements appear.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + manual test.
<img width="1044" alt="Screenshot 2020-10-30 at 15 14 21" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18561820/97715405-a1797000-1ac2-11eb-886a-e3e6efa3af3e.png">

Closes #30151 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-33223.

Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-10 11:22:35 +09:00
Peter Toth 84dc374611 [SPARK-33303][SQL] Deduplicate deterministic PythonUDF calls
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modifies the `ExtractPythonUDFs` rule to deduplicate deterministic PythonUDF calls.

Before this PR the dataframe: `df.withColumn("c", batchedPythonUDF(col("a"))).withColumn("d", col("c"))` has the plan:
```
*(1) Project [value#1 AS a#4, pythonUDF1#15 AS c#7, pythonUDF1#15 AS d#10]
+- BatchEvalPython [dummyUDF(value#1), dummyUDF(value#1)], [pythonUDF0#14, pythonUDF1#15]
   +- LocalTableScan [value#1]
```
After this PR the deterministic PythonUDF calls are deduplicated:
```
*(1) Project [value#1 AS a#4, pythonUDF0#14 AS c#7, pythonUDF0#14 AS d#10]
+- BatchEvalPython [dummyUDF(value#1)], [pythonUDF0#14]
   +- LocalTableScan [value#1]
```

### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a performance issue.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
New and existing UTs.

Closes #30203 from peter-toth/SPARK-33303-deduplicate-deterministic-udf-calls.

Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-09 19:27:36 +09:00
Linhong Liu 4e1c89400d [SPARK-33140][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use sparkSession in AQE context when applying rules
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After #30097, all rules are using `SparkSession.active` to get `SQLConf`
and `SparkSession`. But in AQE, when applying the rules for the initial plan,
we should use the spark session in AQE context.

### Why are the changes needed?
Fix potential problem caused by using the wrong spark session

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Existing ut

Closes #30294 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-33140-followup.

Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-09 09:44:58 +00:00
Yuming Wang 7a5647a93a [SPARK-33385][SQL] Support bucket pruning for IsNaN
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr add support bucket pruning on `IsNaN` predicate.

### Why are the changes needed?

Improve query performance.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30291 from wangyum/SPARK-33385.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-09 09:20:31 +00:00
Yuming Wang 69799c514f [SPARK-33372][SQL] Fix InSet bucket pruning
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr fix `InSet` bucket pruning because of it's values should not be `Literal`:
cbd3fdea62/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala (L253-L255)

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix bug.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test and manual test:

```scala
spark.sql("select id as a, id as b from range(10000)").write.bucketBy(100, "a").saveAsTable("t")
spark.sql("select * from t where a in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)").show
```

Before this PR | After this PR
-- | --
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5399861/98380788-fb120980-2083-11eb-8fae-4e21ad873e9b.png) | ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5399861/98381095-5ba14680-2084-11eb-82ca-2d780c85305c.png)

Closes #30279 from wangyum/SPARK-33372.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-09 08:32:51 +00:00
Wenchen Fan 98730b7ee2 [SPARK-33087][SQL] DataFrameWriterV2 should delegate table resolution to the analyzer
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR makes `DataFrameWriterV2` to create query plans with `UnresolvedRelation` and leave the table resolution work to the analyzer.

### Why are the changes needed?

Table resolution work should be done by the analyzer. After this PR, the behavior is more consistent between different APIs (DataFrameWriter, DataFrameWriterV2 and SQL). See the next section for behavior changes.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes.
1. writes to a temp view of v2 relation: previously it fails with table not found exception, now it works if the v2 relation is writable. This is consistent with `DataFrameWriter` and SQL INSERT.
2. writes to other temp views: previously it fails with table not found exception, now it fails with a more explicit error message, saying that writing to a temp view of non-v2-relation is not allowed.
3. writes to a view: previously it fails with table not writable error, now it fails with a more explicit error message, saying that writing to a view is not allowed.
4. writes to a v1 table: previously it fails with table not writable error, now it fails with a more explicit error message, saying that writing to a v1 table is not allowed. (We can allow it later, by falling back to v1 command)

### How was this patch tested?

new tests

Closes #29970 from cloud-fan/refactor.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-09 08:08:00 +00:00
Huaxin Gao bfb257f078 [SPARK-32405][SQL] Apply table options while creating tables in JDBC Table Catalog
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in JDBCTableCatalog, we ignore the table options when creating table.
```
    // TODO (SPARK-32405): Apply table options while creating tables in JDBC Table Catalog
    if (!properties.isEmpty) {
      logWarning("Cannot create JDBC table with properties, these properties will be " +
        "ignored: " + properties.asScala.map { case (k, v) => s"$k=$v" }.mkString("[", ", ", "]"))
    }
```

### Why are the changes needed?
need to apply the table options when we create table

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no

### How was this patch tested?
add new test

Closes #30154 from huaxingao/table_options.

Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-09 07:02:14 +00:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh c269b53f07 [SPARK-33384][SS] Delete temporary file when cancelling writing to final path even underlying stream throwing error
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In `RenameBasedFSDataOutputStream.cancel`, we do two things: closing underlying stream and delete temporary file, in a single try/catch block. Closing `OutputStream` could possibly throw `IOException` so we possibly missing deleting temporary file.

This patch proposes to delete temporary even underlying stream throwing error.

### Why are the changes needed?

To avoid leaving temporary files during canceling writing in `RenameBasedFSDataOutputStream`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #30290 from viirya/SPARK-33384.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-11-08 18:44:26 -08:00
yangjie01 02fd52cfbc [SPARK-33352][CORE][SQL][SS][MLLIB][AVRO][K8S] Fix procedure-like declaration compilation warnings in Scala 2.13
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two similar compilation warnings about procedure-like declaration in Scala 2.13:

```
[WARNING] [Warn] /spark/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiver.scala:70: procedure syntax is deprecated for constructors: add `=`, as in method definition
```
and

```
[WARNING] [Warn] /spark/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerDecommissioner.scala:211: procedure syntax is deprecated: instead, add `: Unit =` to explicitly declare `run`'s return type
```

this pr is the first part to resolve SPARK-33352:

- For constructors method definition add `=` to convert to function syntax

- For without `return type` methods definition add `: Unit =` to convert to function syntax

### Why are the changes needed?
Eliminate compilation warnings in Scala 2.13 and this change should be compatible with Scala 2.12

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action

Closes #30255 from LuciferYang/SPARK-29392-FOLLOWUP.1.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
2020-11-08 12:51:48 -06:00
Hannah Amundson 1090b1b00a [SPARK-32860][DOCS][SQL] Updating documentation about map support in Encoders
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Javadocs updated for the encoder to include maps as a collection type

### Why are the changes needed?

The javadocs were not updated with fix SPARK-16706

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the javadocs are updated

### How was this patch tested?

sbt was run to ensure it meets scalastyle

Closes #30274 from hannahkamundson/SPARK-32860.

Lead-authored-by: Hannah Amundson <amundson.hannah@heb.com>
Co-authored-by: Hannah <48397717+hannahkamundson@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-08 20:29:24 +09:00
Stuart White 09fa7ecae1 [SPARK-33291][SQL] Improve DataFrame.show for nulls in arrays and structs
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The changes in [SPARK-32501 Inconsistent NULL conversions to strings](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32501) introduced some behavior that I'd like to clean up a bit.

Here's sample code to illustrate the behavior I'd like to clean up:

```scala
val rows = Seq[String](null)
  .toDF("value")
  .withColumn("struct1", struct('value as "value1"))
  .withColumn("struct2", struct('value as "value1", 'value as "value2"))
  .withColumn("array1", array('value))
  .withColumn("array2", array('value, 'value))

// Show the DataFrame using the "first" codepath.
rows.show(truncate=false)
+-----+-------+-------------+------+--------+
|value|struct1|struct2      |array1|array2  |
+-----+-------+-------------+------+--------+
|null |{ null}|{ null, null}|[]    |[, null]|
+-----+-------+-------------+------+--------+

// Write the DataFrame to disk, then read it back and show it to trigger the "codegen" code path:
rows.write.parquet("rows")
spark.read.parquet("rows").show(truncate=false)

+-----+-------+-------------+-------+-------------+
|value|struct1|struct2      |array1 |array2       |
+-----+-------+-------------+-------+-------------+
|null |{ null}|{ null, null}|[ null]|[ null, null]|
+-----+-------+-------------+-------+-------------+
```

Notice:

1. If the first element of a struct is null, it is printed with a leading space (e.g. "\{ null\}").  I think it's preferable to print it without the leading space (e.g. "\{null\}").  This is consistent with how non-null values are printed inside a struct.
2. If the first element of an array is null, it is not printed at all in the first code path, and the "codegen" code path prints it with a leading space.  I think both code paths should be consistent and print it without a leading space (e.g. "[null]").

The desired result of this PR is to product the following output via both code paths:

```
+-----+-------+------------+------+------------+
|value|struct1|struct2     |array1|array2      |
+-----+-------+------------+------+------------+
|null |{null} |{null, null}|[null]|[null, null]|
+-----+-------+------------+------+------------+
```

This contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.

### Why are the changes needed?

To correct errors and inconsistencies in how DataFrame.show() displays nulls inside arrays and structs.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes.  This PR changes what is printed out by DataFrame.show().

### How was this patch tested?

I added new test cases in CastSuite.scala to cover the cases addressed by this PR.

Closes #30189 from stwhit/show_nulls.

Authored-by: Stuart White <stuart.white1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
2020-11-06 13:12:35 -08:00
Terry Kim 68c032c246 [SPARK-33364][SQL] Introduce the "purge" option in TableCatalog.dropTable for v2 catalog
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to introduce the `purge` option in `TableCatalog.dropTable` so that v2 catalogs can use the option if needed.

Related discussion: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30079#discussion_r510594110

### Why are the changes needed?

Spark DDL supports passing the purge option to `DROP TABLE` command. However, the option is not used (ignored) for v2 catalogs.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

This PR introduces a new API in `TableCatalog`.

### How was this patch tested?

Added a test.

Closes #30267 from imback82/purge_table.

Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-11-05 22:00:45 -08:00
Prashant Sharma 733a468726 [SPARK-33130][SQL] Support ALTER TABLE in JDBC v2 Table Catalog: add, update type and nullability of columns (MsSqlServer dialect)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Override the default SQL strings for:
ALTER TABLE RENAME COLUMN
ALTER TABLE UPDATE COLUMN NULLABILITY
in the following MsSQLServer JDBC dialect according to official documentation.
Write MsSqlServer integration tests for JDBC.

### Why are the changes needed?

To add the support for alter table when interacting with MSSql Server.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

added tests

Closes #30038 from ScrapCodes/mssql-dialect.

Authored-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-06 05:46:38 +00:00
Wenchen Fan d16311051d [SPARK-32934][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Refine class naming and code comments
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

1. Rename `OffsetWindowSpec` to `OffsetWindowFunction`, as it's the base class for all offset based window functions.
2. Refine and add more comments.
3. Remove `isRelative` as it's useless.

### Why are the changes needed?

code refinement

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

no

### How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Closes #30261 from cloud-fan/window.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-06 05:20:25 +00:00
Dongjoon Hyun 90f35c663e [MINOR][SQL] Fix incorrect JIRA ID comments in Analyzer
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes incorrect JIRA ids in `Analyzer.scala` introduced by  SPARK-31670 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28490)
```scala
- // SPARK-31607: Resolve Struct field in selectedGroupByExprs/groupByExprs and aggregations
+ // SPARK-31670: Resolve Struct field in selectedGroupByExprs/groupByExprs and aggregations
```

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix the wrong information.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

This is a comment change. Manually review.

Closes #30269 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31670-MINOR.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-06 12:46:26 +09:00
Wenchen Fan cd4e3d3b0c [SPARK-33360][SQL] Simplify DS v2 write resolution
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Removing duplicated code in `ResolveOutputRelation`, by adding `V2WriteCommand.withNewQuery`

### Why are the changes needed?

code cleanup

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Closes #30264 from cloud-fan/ds-minor.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-11-05 15:44:04 -08:00
Wenchen Fan 26ea417b14 [SPARK-33362][SQL] skipSchemaResolution should still require query to be resolved
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix a small bug in `V2WriteCommand.resolved`. It should always require the `table` and `query` to be resolved.

### Why are the changes needed?

To prevent potential bugs that we skip resolve the input query.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

no

### How was this patch tested?

a new test

Closes #30265 from cloud-fan/ds-minor-2.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-11-05 09:23:41 -08:00
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 21413b7dd4 [SPARK-30294][SS] Explicitly defines read-only StateStore and optimize for HDFSBackedStateStore
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There's a concept of 'read-only' and 'read+write' state store in Spark which is defined "implicitly". Spark doesn't prevent write for 'read-only' state store; Spark just assumes read-only stateful operator will not modify the state store. Given it's not defined explicitly, the instance of state store has to be implemented as 'read+write' even it's being used as 'read-only', which sometimes brings confusion.

For example, abort() in HDFSBackedStateStore - d38f816748/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala (L143-L155)

The comment sounds as if statement works differently between 'read-only' and 'read+write', but that's not true as both state store has state initialized as UPDATING (no difference). So 'read-only' state also creates the temporary file, initializes output streams to write to temporary file, closes output streams, and finally deletes the temporary file. This unnecessary operations are being done per batch/partition.

This patch explicitly defines 'read-only' StateStore, and enables state store provider to create 'read-only' StateStore instance if requested. Relevant code paths are modified, as well as 'read-only' StateStore implementation for HDFSBackedStateStore is introduced. The new implementation gets rid of unnecessary operations explained above.

In point of backward-compatibility view, the only thing being changed in public API side is `StateStoreProvider`. The trait `StateStoreProvider` has to be changed to allow requesting 'read-only' StateStore; this patch adds default implementation which leverages 'read+write' StateStore but wrapping with 'write-protected' StateStore instance, so that custom providers don't need to change their code to reflect the change. But if the providers can optimize for read-only workload, they'll be happy to make a change.

Please note that this patch makes ReadOnlyStateStore extend StateStore and being referred as StateStore, as StateStore is being used in so many places and it's not easy to support both traits if we differentiate them. So unfortunately these write methods are still exposed for read-only state; it just throws UnsupportedOperationException.

### Why are the changes needed?

The new API opens the chance to optimize read-only state store instance compared with read+write state store instance. HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider is modified to provide read-only version of state store which doesn't deal with temporary file as well as state machine.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Clearly "no" for most end users, and also "no" for custom state store providers as it doesn't touch trait `StateStore` as well as provides default implementation for added method in trait `StateStoreProvider`.

### How was this patch tested?

Modified UT. Existing UTs ensure the change doesn't break anything.

Closes #26935 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-30294.

Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
2020-11-05 18:21:17 +09:00
HyukjinKwon d530ed0ea8 Revert "[SPARK-33277][PYSPARK][SQL] Use ContextAwareIterator to stop consuming after the task ends"
This reverts commit b8a440f098.
2020-11-05 16:15:17 +09:00
Dongjoon Hyun 42c0b175ce [SPARK-33338][SQL] GROUP BY using literal map should not fail
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to fix `semanticEquals` works correctly on `GetMapValue` expressions having literal maps with `ArrayBasedMapData` and `GenericArrayData`.

### Why are the changes needed?

This is a regression from Apache Spark 1.6.x.
```scala
scala> sc.version
res1: String = 1.6.3

scala> sqlContext.sql("SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY map('k1', 'v1')[k]").show
+---+
|_c0|
+---+
| v1|
+---+
```

Apache Spark 2.x ~ 3.0.1 raise`RuntimeException` for the following queries.
```sql
CREATE TABLE t USING ORC AS SELECT map('k1', 'v1') m, 'k1' k
SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY 1
SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY map('k1', 'v1')[k]
SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] a FROM t GROUP BY a
```

**BEFORE**
```scala
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find k#3 in [keys: [k1], values: [v1][k#3]#6]
	at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:85)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:79)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
```

**AFTER**
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY 1;
v1
Time taken: 1.278 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY map('k1', 'v1')[k];
v1
Time taken: 0.313 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] a FROM t GROUP BY a;
v1
Time taken: 0.265 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs with the newly added test case.

Closes #30246 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33338.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-11-04 08:35:10 -08:00
Erik Krogen ff724d23b6 [SPARK-33214][TEST][HIVE] Stop HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite from using a hard-coded location to store localized Spark binaries
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite` to, by default, use a standard temporary directory to store the Spark binaries that it localizes. It additionally adds a new System property, `spark.test.cache-dir`, which can be used to define a static location into which the Spark binary will be localized to allow for sharing between test executions. If the System property is used, the downloaded binaries won't be deleted after the test runs.

### Why are the changes needed?
In SPARK-22356 (PR #19579), the `sparkTestingDir` used by `HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite` became hard-coded to enable re-use of the downloaded Spark tarball between test executions:
```
  // For local test, you can set `sparkTestingDir` to a static value like `/tmp/test-spark`, to
  // avoid downloading Spark of different versions in each run.
  private val sparkTestingDir = new File("/tmp/test-spark")
```
However this doesn't work, since it gets deleted every time:
```
  override def afterAll(): Unit = {
    try {
      Utils.deleteRecursively(wareHousePath)
      Utils.deleteRecursively(tmpDataDir)
      Utils.deleteRecursively(sparkTestingDir)
    } finally {
      super.afterAll()
    }
  }
```

It's bad that we're hard-coding to a `/tmp` directory, as in some cases this is not the proper place to store temporary files. We're not currently making any good use of it.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Developer-facing changes only, as this is in a test.

### How was this patch tested?
The test continues to execute as expected.

Closes #30122 from xkrogen/xkrogen-SPARK-33214-hiveexternalversioncatalogsuite-fix.

Authored-by: Erik Krogen <xkrogen@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-11-04 06:51:54 +00:00