### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This could reduce the `generate.java` size to prevent codegen fallback which causes performance regression.
here is a case from tpcds that could be fixed by this improvement
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/133964/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.execution/LogicalPlanTagInSparkPlanSuite/q41/
The original case generate 20K bytes, we are trying to reduce it to less than 8k
### Why are the changes needed?
performance improvement as in the PR benchmark test, the performance w/ codegen is 2~3x better than w/o codegen.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
yes, it's a code reflect so the existing ut should be enough
cross-check with https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31012 where the tpcds shall all pass
benchmark compared with master
```logtalk
================================================================================================
Char Varchar Read Side Perf
================================================================================================
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Read with length 20, hasSpaces: false: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read string with length 20 1571 1667 83 63.6 15.7 1.0X
read char with length 20 1710 1764 58 58.5 17.1 0.9X
read varchar with length 20 1774 1792 16 56.4 17.7 0.9X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Read with length 40, hasSpaces: false: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read string with length 40 1824 1927 91 54.8 18.2 1.0X
read char with length 40 1788 1928 137 55.9 17.9 1.0X
read varchar with length 40 1676 1700 40 59.7 16.8 1.1X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Read with length 60, hasSpaces: false: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read string with length 60 1727 1762 30 57.9 17.3 1.0X
read char with length 60 1628 1674 43 61.4 16.3 1.1X
read varchar with length 60 1651 1665 13 60.6 16.5 1.0X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Read with length 80, hasSpaces: true: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read string with length 80 1748 1778 28 57.2 17.5 1.0X
read char with length 80 1673 1678 9 59.8 16.7 1.0X
read varchar with length 80 1667 1684 27 60.0 16.7 1.0X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Read with length 100, hasSpaces: true: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read string with length 100 1709 1743 48 58.5 17.1 1.0X
read char with length 100 1610 1664 67 62.1 16.1 1.1X
read varchar with length 100 1614 1673 53 61.9 16.1 1.1X
================================================================================================
Char Varchar Write Side Perf
================================================================================================
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Write with length 20, hasSpaces: false: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write string with length 20 2277 2327 67 4.4 227.7 1.0X
write char with length 20 2421 2443 19 4.1 242.1 0.9X
write varchar with length 20 2393 2419 27 4.2 239.3 1.0X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Write with length 40, hasSpaces: false: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write string with length 40 2249 2290 38 4.4 224.9 1.0X
write char with length 40 2386 2444 57 4.2 238.6 0.9X
write varchar with length 40 2397 2405 12 4.2 239.7 0.9X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Write with length 60, hasSpaces: false: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write string with length 60 2326 2367 41 4.3 232.6 1.0X
write char with length 60 2478 2501 37 4.0 247.8 0.9X
write varchar with length 60 2475 2503 24 4.0 247.5 0.9X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Write with length 80, hasSpaces: true: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write string with length 80 9367 9773 354 1.1 936.7 1.0X
write char with length 80 10454 10621 238 1.0 1045.4 0.9X
write varchar with length 80 18943 19503 571 0.5 1894.3 0.5X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_251-b08 on Mac OS X 10.16
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
Write with length 100, hasSpaces: true: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write string with length 100 11055 11104 59 0.9 1105.5 1.0X
write char with length 100 12204 12275 63 0.8 1220.4 0.9X
write varchar with length 100 21737 22275 574 0.5 2173.7 0.5X
```
Closes#31199 from yaooqinn/SPARK-34130.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While adding new partition to v2 `InMemoryAtomicPartitionTable`/`InMemoryPartitionTable`, add single row to the table content when the table is fully partitioned.
### Why are the changes needed?
The `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION` command does not change content of fully partitioned v2 table. For instance, `INSERT INTO` changes table content:
```scala
sql(s"CREATE TABLE t (p0 INT, p1 STRING) USING _ PARTITIONED BY (p0, p1)")
sql(s"INSERT INTO t SELECT 1, 'def'")
sql(s"SELECT * FROM t").show(false)
+---+---+
|p0 |p1 |
+---+---+
|1 |def|
+---+---+
```
but `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION` doesn't change v2 table content:
```scala
sql(s"ALTER TABLE t ADD PARTITION (p0 = 0, p1 = 'abc')")
sql(s"SELECT * FROM t").show(false)
+---+---+
|p0 |p1 |
+---+---+
+---+---+
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, the changes impact only on tests but for the example above in tests:
```scala
sql(s"ALTER TABLE t ADD PARTITION (p0 = 0, p1 = 'abc')")
sql(s"SELECT * FROM t").show(false)
+---+---+
|p0 |p1 |
+---+---+
|0 |abc|
+---+---+
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running the unified tests for `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION`.
Closes#31216 from MaxGekk/add-partition-by-all-columns.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change null Literal to PrettyAttribute during ResolveAlias.
### Why are the changes needed?
We will convert `Literal(null)` to target data type during analysis. Then the generated alias name will include something like `CAST(NULL AS String)` instead of `NULL`.
```
spark.sql("SELECT RAND(null)").columns
-- before
rand(CAST(NULL AS INT))
-- after
rand(NULL)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the default column name maybe changed.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test and pass exists test.
Closes#31233 from ulysses-you/SPARK-34150.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, there are many DDL commands where the position of the unresolved identifiers are incorrect:
```
scala> sql("CACHE TABLE unknown")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: unknown; line 1 pos 0;
```
, whereas the `pos` should be `12`.
This PR proposes to fix this issue for commands using `UnresolvedRelation`:
```
CACHE TABLE unknown
UNCACHE TABLE unknown
DELETE FROM unknown
UPDATE unknown SET name='abc'
MERGE INTO unknown1 AS target USING unknown2 AS source ON target.col = source.col WHEN MATCHED THEN DELETE
INSERT INTO TABLE unknown SELECT 1
INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE unknown VALUES (1, 'a')
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now the above example will print the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: unknown; line 1 pos 12;
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a new test.
Closes#31209 from imback82/unresolved_relation_message.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`QueryCompilationErrors.scala` and `QueryExecutionErrors.scala` use the `org.apache.spark.sql.errors` package, but these files are reside in `org/apache/spark/sql` directory. This PR proposes to move these files to `org/apache/spark/sql/errors`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To match the package name with the directory structure.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#31211 from imback82/error_package.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace `toMap` by `map(identity).toMap` while getting canonicalized representation of `CatalogTable`. `CatalogTable` became not serializable after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31112 due to usage of `filterKeys`. The workaround was taken from https://github.com/scala/bug/issues/7005.
### Why are the changes needed?
This prevents the errors like:
```
[info] org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task not serializable: java.io.NotSerializableException: scala.collection.immutable.MapLike$$anon$1
[info] Cause: java.io.NotSerializableException: scala.collection.immutable.MapLike$$anon$1
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Should not.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the test suite affected by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31112:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *AlterTableDropPartitionSuite"
```
Closes#31197 from MaxGekk/fix-caching-hive-table-2-followup.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This:
1. switches Spark to use shaded Hadoop clients, namely hadoop-client-api and hadoop-client-runtime, for Hadoop 3.x.
2. upgrade built-in version for Hadoop 3.x to Hadoop 3.2.2
Note that for Hadoop 2.7, we'll still use the same modules such as hadoop-client.
In order to still keep default Hadoop profile to be hadoop-3.2, this defines the following Maven properties:
```
hadoop-client-api.artifact
hadoop-client-runtime.artifact
hadoop-client-minicluster.artifact
```
which default to:
```
hadoop-client-api
hadoop-client-runtime
hadoop-client-minicluster
```
but all switch to `hadoop-client` when the Hadoop profile is hadoop-2.7. A side affect from this is we'll import the same dependency multiple times. For this I have to disable Maven enforcer `banDuplicatePomDependencyVersions`.
Besides above, there are the following changes:
- explicitly add a few dependencies which are imported via transitive dependencies from Hadoop jars, but are removed from the shaded client jars.
- removed the use of `ProxyUriUtils.getPath` from `ApplicationMaster` which is a server-side/private API.
- modified `IsolatedClientLoader` to exclude `hadoop-auth` jars when Hadoop version is 3.x. This change should only matter when we're not sharing Hadoop classes with Spark (which is _mostly_ used in tests).
### Why are the changes needed?
Hadoop 3.2.2 is released with new features and bug fixes, so it's good for the Spark community to adopt it. However, latest Hadoop versions starting from Hadoop 3.2.1 have upgraded to use Guava 27+. In order to resolve Guava conflicts, this takes the approach by switching to shaded client jars provided by Hadoop. This also has the benefits of avoid pulling other 3rd party dependencies from Hadoop side so as to avoid more potential future conflicts.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
When people use Spark with `hadoop-provided` option, they should make sure class path contains `hadoop-client-api` and `hadoop-client-runtime` jars. In addition, they may need to make sure these jars appear before other Hadoop jars in the order. Otherwise, classes may be loaded from the other non-shaded Hadoop jars and cause potential conflicts.
### How was this patch tested?
Relying on existing tests.
Closes#30701 from sunchao/test-hadoop-3.2.2.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The type-coercion for numeric types of average and sum is not necessary at all, as the resultType and sumType can prevent the overflow.
### Why are the changes needed?
rm unnecessary logic which may cause potential performance regressions
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
tpcds tests for plan
Closes#31079 from yaooqinn/SPARK-34037.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
On the read-side, we should respect the original data instead of trimming it first.
It brings extra overhead on the code-gen code side, trimming and padding for the same field, and it's also unnecessary and a bug
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix and perf regression
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#31181 from yaooqinn/SPARK-34114.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces a new property `spark.sql.cli.print.header` to let users change the behavior of printing header for spark-sql CLI by SET command.
### Why are the changes needed?
Like Hive CLI, spark-sql CLI accepts `hive.cli.print.header` property and we can change the behavior of printing header.
But spark-sql CLI doesn't allow users to change Hive specific configurations dynamically by SET command.
So, it's better to support the way to change the behavior by SET command.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Users can dynamically change the behavior by SET command.
### How was this patch tested?
I confirmed with the following commands/queries.
```
spark-sql> select (1) as a, (2) as b, (3) as c, (4) as d;
1 2 3 4
Time taken: 3.218 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> set spark.sql.cli.print.header=true;
key value
spark.sql.cli.print.header true
Time taken: 1.506 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> select (1) as a, (2) as b, (3) as c, (4) as d;
a b c d
1 2 3 4
Time taken: 0.79 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
Closes#31173 from sarutak/spark-sql-print-header.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to strip auto-generated cast. The main logic is:
1. Add tag if Cast is specified by user.
2. Wrap `PrettyAttribute` in usePrettyExpression.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make sql consistent with dsl. Here is an inconsistent example before this PR:
```
-- output field name: FLOOR(1)
spark.emptyDataFrame.select(floor(lit(1)))
-- output field name: FLOOR(CAST(1 AS DOUBLE))
spark.sql("select floor(1)")
```
Note that, we don't remove the `Cast` so the auto-generated `Cast` can still work. The only changed place is `usePrettyExpression`, we use `PrettyAttribute` replace `Cast` to give a better sql string.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the default field name may change.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test and pass exists test.
Closes#31034 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33989.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
<!--
Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
-->
This PR adds a feature which supports 32-bit unicode escape in string literals like PostgreSQL or some modern programming languages do (e.g, Python3, C++11 and Rust).
In addition to the feature which supports 16-bit unicode escape like `"\u0041"`, users can express unicode characters like `"\U00020BB7"` with this change.
### Why are the changes needed?
<!--
Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
-->
Users can express unicode characters straightly without surrogate pair.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as the documentation fix.
If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
If no, write 'No'.
-->
Yes. Users an express all the unicode characters straightly.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
-->
Added new assertions to the existing test case.
Closes#31096 from sarutak/32-bit-unicode-escape.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some redundant collection conversion can be removed, for version compatibility, clean up these with Scala-2.13 profile.
### Why are the changes needed?
Remove redundant collection conversion
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
- Manual test `core`, `graphx`, `mllib`, `mllib-local`, `sql`, `yarn`,`kafka-0-10` in Scala 2.13 passed
Closes#31125 from LuciferYang/SPARK-34068.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr use `exists` to simplify `find + emptiness check`, it's semantically consistent, but looks simpler.
**Before**
```
seq.find(p).isDefined
or
seq.find(p).isEmpty
```
**After**
```
seq.exists(p)
or
!seq.exists(p)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Code Simpilefications.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#31130 from LuciferYang/SPARK-34070.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/133928/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.execution/LogicalPlanTagInSparkPlanSuite/q41/
We can reduce more than 8000 bytes by removing the unnecessary CONCAT expression.
W/ this fix, for q41 in TPCDS with [Using TPCDS original definitions for char/varchar columns](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31012) applied, we can reduce the stage code-gen size from 22523 to 14369
```
14369 - 22523 = - 8154
```
### Why are the changes needed?
fix the perf regression(we need other improvements for q41 works), there will be a huge performance regression if codegen fails
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
modified uts
Closes#31150 from yaooqinn/SPARK-34086.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In 0f8e5dd445, we partially fix the rule conflicts between `PaddingAndLengthCheckForCharVarchar` and `ResolveAggregateFunctions`, as error still exists in
sql like ```SELECT substr(v, 1, 2), sum(i) FROM t GROUP BY v ORDER BY substr(v, 1, 2)```
```sql
[info] Failed to analyze query: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: expression 'spark_catalog.default.t.`v`' is neither present in the group by, nor is it an aggregate function. Add to group by or wrap in first() (or first_value) if you don't care which value you get.;
[info] Project [substr(v, 1, 2)#100, sum(i)#101L]
[info] +- Sort [aggOrder#102 ASC NULLS FIRST], true
[info] +- !Aggregate [v#106], [substr(v#106, 1, 2) AS substr(v, 1, 2)#100, sum(cast(i#98 as bigint)) AS sum(i)#101L, substr(v#103, 1, 2) AS aggOrder#102
[info] +- SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.t
[info] +- Project [if ((length(v#97) <= 3)) v#97 else if ((length(rtrim(v#97, None)) > 3)) cast(raise_error(concat(input string of length , cast(length(v#97) as string), exceeds varchar type length limitation: 3)) as string) else rpad(rtrim(v#97, None), 3, ) AS v#106, i#98]
[info] +- Relation[v#97,i#98] parquet
[info]
[info] Project [substr(v, 1, 2)#100, sum(i)#101L]
[info] +- Sort [aggOrder#102 ASC NULLS FIRST], true
[info] +- !Aggregate [v#106], [substr(v#106, 1, 2) AS substr(v, 1, 2)#100, sum(cast(i#98 as bigint)) AS sum(i)#101L, substr(v#103, 1, 2) AS aggOrder#102
[info] +- SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.t
[info] +- Project [if ((length(v#97) <= 3)) v#97 else if ((length(rtrim(v#97, None)) > 3)) cast(raise_error(concat(input string of length , cast(length(v#97) as string), exceeds varchar type length limitation: 3)) as string) else rpad(rtrim(v#97, None), 3, ) AS v#106, i#98]
[info] +- Relation[v#97,i#98] parquet
```
We need to look recursively into children to find char/varchars.
In this PR, we try to resolve the full attributes including the original `Aggregate` expressions and the candidates in `SortOrder` together, then use the new re-resolved `Aggregate` expressions to determine which candidate in the `SortOrder` shall be pushed. This can avoid mismatch for the same attributes w/o this change, as the expressions returned by `executeSameContext` will change when `PaddingAndLengthCheckForCharVarchar` takes effects. W/ this change, the expressions can be matched correctly.
For those unmatched, w need to look recursively into children to find char/varchars instead of the expression itself only.
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add new tests
Closes#31129 from yaooqinn/SPARK-34003-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a legacy configuration `spark.sql.legacy.allowParameterlessCount` in case users need the parameterless count.
This is a follow-up for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30541.
### Why are the changes needed?
There can be some users depends on the legacy behavior. We need a legacy flag for it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, adding a legacy flag `spark.sql.legacy.allowParameterlessCount`.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#31143 from gengliangwang/countLegacy.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes few issues when using encoders to serialize input/output in `ScalaUDF`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This fixes a bug when using encoders in Scala UDF. First, the output data type should be corrected to the corresponding data type of the object serializer. Second, `catalystConverter` should not serialize `Option[_]` as the ordinary row because in `ScalaUDF` case it is serialized to a column, not the top-level row. Otherwise, there will be a redundant `value` struct wrapping the serialized `Option[_]` object.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, fixing a bug of `ScalaUDF`.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#31103 from viirya/SPARK-34002.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix canonicalisation of `HiveTableRelation` by normalisation of `CatalogTable`, and exclude table stats and temporary fields from the canonicalized plan.
### Why are the changes needed?
This fixes the issue demonstrated by the example below:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.statistics.size.autoUpdate.enabled", true)
scala> sql(s"CREATE TABLE tbl (id int, part int) USING hive PARTITIONED BY (part)")
scala> sql("INSERT INTO tbl PARTITION (part=0) SELECT 0")
scala> sql("INSERT INTO tbl PARTITION (part=1) SELECT 1")
scala> sql("CACHE TABLE tbl")
scala> sql("SELECT * FROM tbl").show(false)
+---+----+
|id |part|
+---+----+
|0 |0 |
|1 |1 |
+---+----+
scala> spark.catalog.isCached("tbl")
scala> sql("ALTER TABLE tbl DROP PARTITION (part=0)")
scala> spark.catalog.isCached("tbl")
res19: Boolean = false
```
`ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` must keep the table in the cache.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the drop partition command keeps the table in the cache while updating table stats:
```scala
scala> sql("ALTER TABLE tbl DROP PARTITION (part=0)")
scala> spark.catalog.isCached("tbl")
res19: Boolean = true
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running new UT in `AlterTableDropPartitionSuite`.
Closes#31112 from MaxGekk/fix-caching-hive-table-2.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, there are many DDL commands where the position of the unresolved identifiers are incorrect:
```
scala> sql("DROP TABLE unknown")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: unknown; line 1 pos 0;
```
, whereas the `pos` should be `11`.
This PR proposes to fix this issue for commands using `UnresolvedTableOrView`:
```
DROP TABLE unknown
DESCRIBE TABLE unknown
ANALYZE TABLE unknown COMPUTE STATISTICS
ANALYZE TABLE unknown COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR COLUMNS col
ANALYZE TABLE unknown COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS
SHOW CREATE TABLE unknown
REFRESH TABLE unknown
SHOW COLUMNS FROM unknown
SHOW COLUMNS FROM unknown IN db
ALTER TABLE unknown RENAME TO t
ALTER VIEW unknown RENAME TO v
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now the above example will print the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found: unknown; line 1 pos 11;
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a new test.
Closes#31106 from imback82/unresolved_table_or_view_message.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is basically a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332.
Calling `map` alone might leave it not executed due to lazy evaluation, e.g.)
```
scala> val foo = Seq(1,2,3)
foo: Seq[Int] = List(1, 2, 3)
scala> foo.map(println)
1
2
3
res0: Seq[Unit] = List((), (), ())
scala> foo.view.map(println)
res1: scala.collection.SeqView[Unit,Seq[_]] = SeqViewM(...)
scala> foo.view.foreach(println)
1
2
3
```
We should better use `foreach` to make sure it's executed where the output is unused or `Unit`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To prevent the potential issues by not executing `map`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, the current codes look not causing any problem for now.
### How was this patch tested?
I found these item by running IntelliJ inspection, double checked one by one, and fixed them. These should be all instances across the codebase ideally.
Closes#31110 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34059.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move `RepartitionByExpression` fold partition number code to a new rule at `Optimizer`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We meet some ploblem when backport SPARK-33806. It is because the UnresolvedFunction.foldable will throw a exception. It's ok with master branch, but it's better to do it at Optimizer. Some reason:
1. It's not always safe to call Expression.foldable before analysis.
2. fold num partition to 1 more like a optimize behavior.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test.
Closes#31077 from ulysses-you/SPARK-34030.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes `StreamExecution` use the `Write` abstraction introduced in SPARK-33779.
Note: we will need separate plans for streaming writes in order to support the required distribution and ordering in SS. This change only migrates to the `Write` abstraction.
### Why are the changes needed?
These changes prevent exceptions from data sources that implement only the `build` method in `WriteBuilder`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#31093 from aokolnychyi/spark-34049.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an incorrect unicode literal test in `ParserUtilsSuite`.
In that suite, string literals in queries have unicode escape characters like `\u7328` but the backslash should be escaped because
the queriy strings are given as Java strings.
### Why are the changes needed?
Correct the test.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Run `ParserUtilsSuite` and it passed.
Closes#31088 from sarutak/fix-incorrect-unicode-test.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Recognize `null` while parsing partition specs, and put `null` instead of `"null"` as partition values.
2. For V1 catalog: replace `null` by `__HIVE_DEFAULT_PARTITION__`.
3. For V2 catalogs: pass `null` AS IS, and let catalog implementations to decide how to handle `null`s as partition values in spec.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, `null` in partition specs is recognized as the `"null"` string which could lead to incorrect results, for example:
```sql
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE tbl5 (col1 INT, p1 STRING) USING PARQUET PARTITIONED BY (p1);
spark-sql> INSERT INTO TABLE tbl5 PARTITION (p1 = null) SELECT 0;
spark-sql> SELECT isnull(p1) FROM tbl5;
false
```
Even we inserted a row to the partition with the `null` value, **the resulted table doesn't contain `null`**.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the example above works as expected:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT isnull(p1) FROM tbl5;
true
```
### How was this patch tested?
1. By running the affected test suites `SQLQuerySuite`, `AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite` and `v1/ShowPartitionsSuite`.
2. Compiling by Scala 2.13:
```
$ ./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.13
$ ./build/sbt -Pscala-2.13 compile
```
Closes#30538 from MaxGekk/partition-spec-value-null.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ResolveAggregateFunctions is a hacky rule and it calls `executeSameContext` to generate a `resolved agg` to determine which unresolved sort attribute should be pushed into the agg. However, after we add the PaddingAndLengthCheckForCharVarchar rule which will rewrite the query output, thus, the `resolved agg` cannot match original attributes anymore.
It causes some dissociative sort attribute to be pushed in and fails the query
``` logtalk
[info] Failed to analyze query: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: expression 'testcat.t1.`v`' is neither present in the group by, nor is it an aggregate function. Add to group by or wrap in first() (or first_value) if you don't care which value you get.;
[info] Project [v#14, sum(i)#11L]
[info] +- Sort [aggOrder#12 ASC NULLS FIRST], true
[info] +- !Aggregate [v#14], [v#14, sum(cast(i#7 as bigint)) AS sum(i)#11L, v#13 AS aggOrder#12]
[info] +- SubqueryAlias testcat.t1
[info] +- Project [if ((length(v#6) <= 3)) v#6 else if ((length(rtrim(v#6, None)) > 3)) cast(raise_error(concat(input string of length , cast(length(v#6) as string), exceeds varchar type length limitation: 3)) as string) else rpad(rtrim(v#6, None), 3, ) AS v#14, i#7]
[info] +- RelationV2[v#6, i#7, index#15, _partition#16] testcat.t1
[info]
[info] Project [v#14, sum(i)#11L]
[info] +- Sort [aggOrder#12 ASC NULLS FIRST], true
[info] +- !Aggregate [v#14], [v#14, sum(cast(i#7 as bigint)) AS sum(i)#11L, v#13 AS aggOrder#12]
[info] +- SubqueryAlias testcat.t1
[info] +- Project [if ((length(v#6) <= 3)) v#6 else if ((length(rtrim(v#6, None)) > 3)) cast(raise_error(concat(input string of length , cast(length(v#6) as string), exceeds varchar type length limitation: 3)) as string) else rpad(rtrim(v#6, None), 3, ) AS v#14, i#7]
[info] +- RelationV2[v#6, i#7, index#15, _partition#16] testcat.t1
```
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#31027 from yaooqinn/SPARK-34003.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr add row count to `Union` operator when CBO enabled.
```scala
spark.sql("CREATE TABLE t1 USING parquet AS SELECT id FROM RANGE(10)")
spark.sql("CREATE TABLE t2 USING parquet AS SELECT id FROM RANGE(10)")
spark.sql("ANALYZE TABLE t1 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS")
spark.sql("ANALYZE TABLE t2 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.cbo.enabled=true")
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2").explain("cost")
```
Before this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Union false, false, Statistics(sizeInBytes=320.0 B)
:- Relation[id#5880L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=160.0 B, rowCount=10)
+- Relation[id#5881L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=160.0 B, rowCount=10)
```
After this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Union false, false, Statistics(sizeInBytes=320.0 B, rowCount=20)
:- Relation[id#2138L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=160.0 B, rowCount=10)
+- Relation[id#2139L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=160.0 B, rowCount=10)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve query performance, [`JoinEstimation.estimateInnerOuterJoin`](d6a68e0b67/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala (L55-L156)) need the row count.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#31068 from wangyum/SPARK-34031.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr address https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30865#pullrequestreview-562344089 to fix simplify conditional in predicate should consider deterministic.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#31067 from wangyum/SPARK-33861-2.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is one compilation warning as follow:
```
[WARNING] [Warn] /spark/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala:1555: [other-match-analysis org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.SessionCatalog.lookupFunction.catalogFunction] unreachable code
```
This compilation warning is due to `NoSuchPermanentFunctionException` is sub-class of `AnalysisException` and if there is `NoSuchPermanentFunctionException` be thrown out, it will be catch by `case _: AnalysisException => failFunctionLookup(name)`, so `case _: NoSuchPermanentFunctionException => failFunctionLookup(name)` is `unreachable code`.
This pr remove `case _: NoSuchPermanentFunctionException => failFunctionLookup(name)` directly because both these 2 branches handle exceptions in the same way: `failFunctionLookup(name)`
### Why are the changes needed?
Cleanup "unreachable code" compilation warnings.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#31064 from LuciferYang/SPARK-34028.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add check partition expressions is empty.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should keep `spark.range(1).hint("REPARTITION_BY_RANGE")` has default shuffle number instead of 1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test.
Closes#31074 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33806-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should optimize Like Any/All by LikeSimplification to improve performance.
### Why are the changes needed?
Optimize Like Any/All
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#30975 from beliefer/SPARK-33938.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change `FrameLessOffsetWindowFunction` as sealed abstract class so that simplify pattern match.
### Why are the changes needed?
Simplify pattern match
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test
Closes#31026 from beliefer/SPARK-30789-followup.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22696 we support HAVING without GROUP BY means global aggregate
But since we treat having as Filter before, in this way will cause a lot of analyze error, after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28294 we use `UnresolvedHaving` to instead `Filter` to solve such problem, but break origin logical about treat `SELECT 1 FROM range(10) HAVING true` as `SELECT 1 FROM range(10) WHERE true` .
This PR fix this issue and add UT.
### Why are the changes needed?
Keep consistent behavior of migration guide.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#31039 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-25780-Follow-up.
Authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR group exception messages in `/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It will largely help with standardization of error messages and its maintenance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. Error messages remain unchanged.
### How was this patch tested?
No new tests - pass all original tests to make sure it doesn't break any existing behavior.
Closes#30870 from beliefer/SPARK-33542.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Port DS V2 tests from `DataSourceV2SQLSuite` to the base test suite `ShowNamespacesSuiteBase` to run those tests for v1 catalogs.
2. Port DS v1 tests from `DDLSuite` to `ShowNamespacesSuiteBase` to run the tests for v2 catalogs too.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running new test suites:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *ShowNamespacesSuite"
```
Closes#30937 from MaxGekk/unify-show-namespaces-tests.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changed the cost function in CBO to match documentation.
### Why are the changes needed?
The parameter `spark.sql.cbo.joinReorder.card.weight` is documented as:
```
The weight of cardinality (number of rows) for plan cost comparison in join reorder: rows * weight + size * (1 - weight).
```
The implementation in `JoinReorderDP.betterThan` does not match this documentaiton:
```
def betterThan(other: JoinPlan, conf: SQLConf): Boolean = {
if (other.planCost.card == 0 || other.planCost.size == 0) {
false
} else {
val relativeRows = BigDecimal(this.planCost.card) / BigDecimal(other.planCost.card)
val relativeSize = BigDecimal(this.planCost.size) / BigDecimal(other.planCost.size)
relativeRows * conf.joinReorderCardWeight +
relativeSize * (1 - conf.joinReorderCardWeight) < 1
}
}
```
This different implementation has an unfortunate consequence:
given two plans A and B, both A betterThan B and B betterThan A might give the same results. This happes when one has many rows with small sizes and other has few rows with large sizes.
A example values, that have this fenomen with the default weight value (0.7):
A.card = 500, B.card = 300
A.size = 30, B.size = 80
Both A betterThan B and B betterThan A would have score above 1 and would return false.
This happens with several of the TPCDS queries.
The new implementation does not have this behavior.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
New and existing UTs
Closes#30965 from tanelk/SPARK-33935_cbo_cost_function.
Authored-by: tanel.kiis@gmail.com <tanel.kiis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29643, we move the plan rewriting methods to QueryPlan. we need to override transformUpWithNewOutput to add allowInvokingTransformsInAnalyzer
because it and resolveOperatorsUpWithNewOutput are called in the analyzer.
For example,
PaddingAndLengthCheckForCharVarchar could fail query when resolveOperatorsUpWithNewOutput
with
```logtalk
[info] - char/varchar resolution in sub query *** FAILED *** (367 milliseconds)
[info] java.lang.RuntimeException: This method should not be called in the analyzer
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.assertNotAnalysisRule(AnalysisHelper.scala:150)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.assertNotAnalysisRule$(AnalysisHelper.scala:146)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.assertNotAnalysisRule(LogicalPlan.scala:29)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.transformDown(AnalysisHelper.scala:161)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.transformDown$(AnalysisHelper.scala:160)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.transformDown(LogicalPlan.scala:29)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.transformDown(LogicalPlan.scala:29)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$plans$QueryPlan$$updateOuterReferencesInSubquery(QueryPlan.scala:267)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
trivial bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#31013 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33992.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Instead of returning NULL, the next_day function throws runtime IllegalArgumentException when ansiMode is enable and receiving invalid input of the dayOfWeek parameter.
### Why are the changes needed?
For ansiMode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
When spark.sql.ansi.enabled = true, the next_day function will throw IllegalArgumentException when receiving invalid input of the dayOfWeek parameter.
When spark.sql.ansi.enabled = false, same behaviour as before.
### How was this patch tested?
Ansi mode is tested with existing tests.
End-to-end tests have been added.
Closes#30807 from chongguang/SPARK-33794.
Authored-by: Chongguang LIU <chongguang.liu@laposte.fr>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added the `RemoveNoopOperators` rule to optimization batch `Union`. Also made sure that the `RemoveNoopOperators` would be idempotent.
### Why are the changes needed?
In several TPCDS queries the `CombineUnions` rule does not manage to combine unions, because they have noop `Project`s between them.
The `Project`s will be removed by `RemoveNoopOperators`, but by then `ReplaceDistinctWithAggregate` has been applied and there are aggregates between the unions. Adding a copy of `RemoveNoopOperators` earlier in the optimization chain allows `CombineUnions` to work on more queries.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
New UTs and the output of `PlanStabilitySuite`
Closes#30996 from tanelk/SPARK-33964_combine_unions.
Authored-by: tanel.kiis@gmail.com <tanel.kiis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove partition data by `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` in V2 table catalog used in tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a bug fix. Before the fix, `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` does not remove the data belongs to the dropped partition. As a consequence of that, the `select` query returns removed data.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running tests suites for v1 and v2 catalogs:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *AlterTableDropPartitionSuite"
```
Closes#31014 from MaxGekk/fix-drop-partition-v2.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to implement `DESCRIBE COLUMN` for v2 tables.
Note that `isExnteded` option is not implemented in this PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
Parity with v1 tables.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now, `DESCRIBE COLUMN` works for v2 tables.
```scala
sql("CREATE TABLE testcat.tbl (id bigint, data string COMMENT 'hello') USING foo")
sql("DESCRIBE testcat.tbl data").show
```
```
+---------+----------+
|info_name|info_value|
+---------+----------+
| col_name| data|
|data_type| string|
| comment| hello|
+---------+----------+
```
Before this PR, the command would fail with: `Describing columns is not supported for v2 tables.`
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test.
Closes#30881 from imback82/describe_col_v2.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fix some operator missing rowCount when enable CBO, e.g.:
```scala
spark.range(1000).selectExpr("id as a", "id as b").write.saveAsTable("t1")
spark.sql("ANALYZE TABLE t1 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.cbo.enabled=true")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.cbo.planStats.enabled=true")
spark.sql("select * from (select * from t1 distribute by a limit 100) distribute by b").explain("cost")
```
Before this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
RepartitionByExpression [b#2129L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.3 KiB)
+- GlobalLimit 100, Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.3 KiB, rowCount=100)
+- LocalLimit 100, Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB)
+- RepartitionByExpression [a#2128L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB)
+- Relation[a#2128L,b#2129L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB, rowCount=1.00E+3)
```
After this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
RepartitionByExpression [b#2129L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.3 KiB, rowCount=100)
+- GlobalLimit 100, Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.3 KiB, rowCount=100)
+- LocalLimit 100, Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB, rowCount=1.00E+3)
+- RepartitionByExpression [a#2128L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB, rowCount=1.00E+3)
+- Relation[a#2128L,b#2129L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB, rowCount=1.00E+3)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
[`JoinEstimation.estimateInnerOuterJoin`](d6a68e0b67/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala (L55-L156)) need the row count.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30987 from wangyum/SPARK-33954.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The error messages for specifying filter and distinct for the aggregate function are mixed together and should be separated. This can increase readability and ease of use.
### Why are the changes needed?
increase readability and ease of use.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'Yes'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test
Closes#30982 from beliefer/SPARK-33951.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to add latest offset to source progress for streaming queries.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we record start and end offsets per source in streaming process. Latest offset is an important information for streaming process but the progress lacks of this info. We can use it to track the process lag and adjust streaming queries. We should add latest offset to source progress.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, for new metric about latest source offset in source progress.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test. Manually test in Spark cluster:
```
"description" : "KafkaV2[Subscribe[page_view_events]]",
"startOffset" : {
"page_view_events" : {
"2" : 582370921,
"4" : 391910836,
"1" : 631009201,
"3" : 406601346,
"0" : 195799112
}
},
"endOffset" : {
"page_view_events" : {
"2" : 583764414,
"4" : 392338002,
"1" : 632183480,
"3" : 407101489,
"0" : 197304028
}
},
"latestOffset" : {
"page_view_events" : {
"2" : 589852545,
"4" : 394204277,
"1" : 637313869,
"3" : 409286602,
"0" : 203878962
}
},
"numInputRows" : 4999997,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 29287.70501405811,
```
Closes#30988 from viirya/latest-offset.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skip table stats in canonicalizing of `HiveTableRelation`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix a regression comparing to Spark 3.0, see SPARK-33963.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After changes Spark behaves as in the version 3.0.1.
### How was this patch tested?
By running new UT:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *CachedTableSuite"
```
Closes#30995 from MaxGekk/fix-caching-hive-table.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr improve the statistics estimation of the `Tail`:
```scala
spark.sql("set spark.sql.cbo.enabled=true")
spark.range(100).selectExpr("id as a", "id as b", "id as c", "id as e").write.saveAsTable("t1")
println(Tail(Literal(5), spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t1").queryExecution.logical).queryExecution.stringWithStats)
```
Before this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Tail 5, Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.8 KiB)
+- Relation[a#24L,b#25L,c#26L,e#27L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.8 KiB)
```
After this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Tail 5, Statistics(sizeInBytes=200.0 B, rowCount=5)
+- Relation[a#24L,b#25L,c#26L,e#27L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.8 KiB)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Import statistics estimation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30991 from wangyum/SPARK-33959.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr add rowCount for `Range` operator:
```scala
spark.sql("set spark.sql.cbo.enabled=true")
spark.sql("select id from range(100)").explain("cost")
```
Before this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Range (0, 100, step=1, splits=None), Statistics(sizeInBytes=800.0 B)
```
After this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Range (0, 100, step=1, splits=None), Statistics(sizeInBytes=800.0 B, rowCount=100)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
[`JoinEstimation.estimateInnerOuterJoin`](d6a68e0b67/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala (L55-L156)) need the row count.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30989 from wangyum/SPARK-33956.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
