## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If there are many branches in a CaseWhen expression, the generated code could go above the 64K limit for single java method, will fail to compile. This PR change it to fallback to interpret mode if there are more than 20 branches.
This PR is based on #11243 and #11221, thanks to joehalliwell
Closes#11243Closes#11221
## How was this patch tested?
Add a test with 50 branches.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11592 from davies/fix_when.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Analysis exception occurs while running the following query.
```
SELECT ints FROM nestedArray LATERAL VIEW explode(a.b) `a` AS `ints`
```
```
Failed to analyze query: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '`ints`' given input columns: [a, `ints`]; line 1 pos 7
'Project ['ints]
+- Generate explode(a#0.b), true, false, Some(a), [`ints`#8]
+- SubqueryAlias nestedarray
+- LocalRelation [a#0], [[[[1,2,3]]]]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests in SQLQuerySuite and HiveQlSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#11538 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-13698.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In order to make `docs/examples` (and other related code) more simple/readable/user-friendly, this PR replaces existing codes like the followings by using `diamond` operator.
```
- final ArrayList<Product2<Object, Object>> dataToWrite =
- new ArrayList<Product2<Object, Object>>();
+ final ArrayList<Product2<Object, Object>> dataToWrite = new ArrayList<>();
```
Java 7 or higher supports **diamond** operator which replaces the type arguments required to invoke the constructor of a generic class with an empty set of type parameters (<>). Currently, Spark Java code use mixed usage of this.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Pass the existing tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11541 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-13702.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ScalaReflection.mirror` method should be synchronized when scala version is `2.10` because `universe.runtimeMirror` is not thread safe.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a test to check thread safety of `ScalaRefection.mirror` method in `ScalaReflectionSuite`, which will throw the following Exception in Scala `2.10` without this patch:
```
[info] - thread safety of mirror *** FAILED *** (49 milliseconds)
[info] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: tail of empty list
[info] at scala.collection.immutable.Nil$.tail(List.scala:339)
[info] at scala.collection.immutable.Nil$.tail(List.scala:334)
[info] at scala.reflect.internal.SymbolTable.popPhase(SymbolTable.scala:172)
[info] at scala.reflect.internal.Symbols$Symbol.unsafeTypeParams(Symbols.scala:1477)
[info] at scala.reflect.internal.Symbols$TypeSymbol.tpe(Symbols.scala:2777)
[info] at scala.reflect.internal.Mirrors$RootsBase.init(Mirrors.scala:235)
[info] at scala.reflect.runtime.JavaMirrors$class.createMirror(JavaMirrors.scala:34)
[info] at scala.reflect.runtime.JavaMirrors$class.runtimeMirror(JavaMirrors.scala:61)
[info] at scala.reflect.runtime.JavaUniverse.runtimeMirror(JavaUniverse.scala:12)
[info] at scala.reflect.runtime.JavaUniverse.runtimeMirror(JavaUniverse.scala:12)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.mirror(ScalaReflection.scala:36)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflectionSuite$$anonfun$12$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(ScalaReflectionSuite.scala:256)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflectionSuite$$anonfun$12$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(ScalaReflectionSuite.scala:252)
[info] at scala.concurrent.impl.Future$PromiseCompletingRunnable.liftedTree1$1(Future.scala:24)
[info] at scala.concurrent.impl.Future$PromiseCompletingRunnable.run(Future.scala:24)
[info] at scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$3.exec(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:107)
[info] at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260)
[info] at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1339)
[info] at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)
[info] at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)
```
Notice that the test will pass when Scala version is `2.11`.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#11487 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-13640.
This PR replaces #9925 which had issues with CI. **Please see the original PR for any previous discussions.**
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecate the SparkSQL column operator !== and use =!= as an alternative.
Fixes subtle issues related to operator precedence (basically, !== does not have the same priority as its logical negation, ===).
## How was this patch tested?
All currently existing tests.
Author: Jakob Odersky <jodersky@gmail.com>
Closes#11588 from jodersky/SPARK-7286.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a filter predicate or a join condition consists of `IsNotNull` checks, we should reorder these checks such that these non-nullability checks are evaluated before the rest of the predicates.
For e.g., if a filter predicate is of the form `a > 5 && isNotNull(b)`, we should rewrite this as `isNotNull(b) && a > 5` during physical plan generation.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit tests that verify the physical plan for both filters and joins in `ReorderedPredicateSuite`
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#11511 from sameeragarwal/reorder-isnotnull.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR add SQL generation support for aggregate with multi-distinct, by simply moving the `DistinctAggregationRewriter` rule to optimizer.
More discussions are needed as this breaks an import contract: analyzed plan should be able to run without optimization. However, the `ComputeCurrentTime` rule has kind of broken it already, and I think maybe we should add a new phase for this kind of rules, because strictly speaking they don't belong to analysis and is coupled with the physical plan implementation.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11579 from cloud-fan/distinct.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In order to avoid StackOverflow when parse a expression with hundreds of ORs, we should use loop instead of recursive functions to flatten the tree as list. This PR also build a balanced tree to reduce the depth of generated And/Or expression, to avoid StackOverflow in analyzer/optimizer.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new unit tests. Manually tested with TPCDS Q3 with hundreds predicates in it [1]. These predicates help to reduce the number of partitions, then the query time went from 60 seconds to 8 seconds.
[1] https://github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit/blob/master/queries/q3.sql
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11501 from davies/long_or.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The code in `Expand.apply` can be simplified by existing information:
* the `groupByExprs` parameter are all `Attribute`s
* the `child` parameter is a `Project` that append aliased group by expressions to its child's output
## How was this patch tested?
by existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11485 from cloud-fan/expand.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR change the way how we generate the code for the output variables passing from a plan to it's parent.
Right now, they are generated before call consume() of it's parent. It's not efficient, if the parent is a Filter or Join, which could filter out most the rows, the time to access some of the columns that are not used by the Filter or Join are wasted.
This PR try to improve this by defering the access of columns until they are actually used by a plan. After this PR, a plan does not need to generate code to evaluate the variables for output, just passing the ExprCode to its parent by `consume()`. In `parent.consumeChild()`, it will check the output from child and `usedInputs`, generate the code for those columns that is part of `usedInputs` before calling `doConsume()`.
This PR also change the `if` from
```
if (cond) {
xxx
}
```
to
```
if (!cond) continue;
xxx
```
The new one could help to reduce the nested indents for multiple levels of Filter and BroadcastHashJoin.
It also added some comments for operators.
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit tests. Manually ran TPCDS Q55, this PR improve the performance about 30% (scale=10, from 2.56s to 1.96s)
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11274 from davies/gen_defer.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we add more DDL parsing logic in the future, SparkQl will become very big. To keep it smaller, we'll introduce helper "parser objects", e.g. one to parse alter table commands. However, these parser objects will need to access some helper methods that exist in CatalystQl. The proposal is to move those methods to an isolated ParserUtils object.
This is based on viirya's changes in #11048. It prefaces the bigger fix for SPARK-13139 to make the diff of that patch smaller.
## How was this patch tested?
No change in functionality, so just Jenkins.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11529 from andrewor14/parser-utils.
`HadoopFsRelation` is used for reading most files into Spark SQL. However today this class mixes the concerns of file management, schema reconciliation, scan building, bucketing, partitioning, and writing data. As a result, many data sources are forced to reimplement the same functionality and the various layers have accumulated a fair bit of inefficiency. This PR is a first cut at separating this into several components / interfaces that are each described below. Additionally, all implementations inside of Spark (parquet, csv, json, text, orc, svmlib) have been ported to the new API `FileFormat`. External libraries, such as spark-avro will also need to be ported to work with Spark 2.0.
### HadoopFsRelation
A simple `case class` that acts as a container for all of the metadata required to read from a datasource. All discovery, resolution and merging logic for schemas and partitions has been removed. This an internal representation that no longer needs to be exposed to developers.
```scala
case class HadoopFsRelation(
sqlContext: SQLContext,
location: FileCatalog,
partitionSchema: StructType,
dataSchema: StructType,
bucketSpec: Option[BucketSpec],
fileFormat: FileFormat,
options: Map[String, String]) extends BaseRelation
```
### FileFormat
The primary interface that will be implemented by each different format including external libraries. Implementors are responsible for reading a given format and converting it into `InternalRow` as well as writing out an `InternalRow`. A format can optionally return a schema that is inferred from a set of files.
```scala
trait FileFormat {
def inferSchema(
sqlContext: SQLContext,
options: Map[String, String],
files: Seq[FileStatus]): Option[StructType]
def prepareWrite(
sqlContext: SQLContext,
job: Job,
options: Map[String, String],
dataSchema: StructType): OutputWriterFactory
def buildInternalScan(
sqlContext: SQLContext,
dataSchema: StructType,
requiredColumns: Array[String],
filters: Array[Filter],
bucketSet: Option[BitSet],
inputFiles: Array[FileStatus],
broadcastedConf: Broadcast[SerializableConfiguration],
options: Map[String, String]): RDD[InternalRow]
}
```
The current interface is based on what was required to get all the tests passing again, but still mixes a couple of concerns (i.e. `bucketSet` is passed down to the scan instead of being resolved by the planner). Additionally, scans are still returning `RDD`s instead of iterators for single files. In a future PR, bucketing should be removed from this interface and the scan should be isolated to a single file.
### FileCatalog
This interface is used to list the files that make up a given relation, as well as handle directory based partitioning.
```scala
trait FileCatalog {
def paths: Seq[Path]
def partitionSpec(schema: Option[StructType]): PartitionSpec
def allFiles(): Seq[FileStatus]
def getStatus(path: Path): Array[FileStatus]
def refresh(): Unit
}
```
Currently there are two implementations:
- `HDFSFileCatalog` - based on code from the old `HadoopFsRelation`. Infers partitioning by recursive listing and caches this data for performance
- `HiveFileCatalog` - based on the above, but it uses the partition spec from the Hive Metastore.
### ResolvedDataSource
Produces a logical plan given the following description of a Data Source (which can come from DataFrameReader or a metastore):
- `paths: Seq[String] = Nil`
- `userSpecifiedSchema: Option[StructType] = None`
- `partitionColumns: Array[String] = Array.empty`
- `bucketSpec: Option[BucketSpec] = None`
- `provider: String`
- `options: Map[String, String]`
This class is responsible for deciding which of the Data Source APIs a given provider is using (including the non-file based ones). All reconciliation of partitions, buckets, schema from metastores or inference is done here.
### DataSourceAnalysis / DataSourceStrategy
Responsible for analyzing and planning reading/writing of data using any of the Data Source APIs, including:
- pruning the files from partitions that will be read based on filters.
- appending partition columns*
- applying additional filters when a data source can not evaluate them internally.
- constructing an RDD that is bucketed correctly when required*
- sanity checking schema match-up and other analysis when writing.
*In the future we should do that following:
- Break out file handling into its own Strategy as its sufficiently complex / isolated.
- Push the appending of partition columns down in to `FileFormat` to avoid an extra copy / unvectorization.
- Use a custom RDD for scans instead of `SQLNewNewHadoopRDD2`
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11509 from marmbrus/fileDataSource.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Non-deterministic predicates should not be pushed through Generate.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case in `FilterPushdownSuite.scala`
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11562 from gatorsmile/pushPredicateDownWindow.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds an optimizer rule to eliminate reading (unnecessary) NULL values if they are not required for correctness by inserting `isNotNull` filters is the query plan. These filters are currently inserted beneath existing `Filter` and `Join` operators and are inferred based on their data constraints.
Note: While this optimization is applicable to all types of join, it primarily benefits `Inner` and `LeftSemi` joins.
## How was this patch tested?
1. Added a new `NullFilteringSuite` that tests for `IsNotNull` filters in the query plan for joins and filters. Also, tests interaction with the `CombineFilters` optimizer rules.
2. Test generated ExpressionTrees via `OrcFilterSuite`
3. Test filter source pushdown logic via `SimpleTextHadoopFsRelationSuite`
cc yhuai nongli
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#11372 from sameeragarwal/gen-isnotnull.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's weird that expressions don't always have all the expressions in it. This PR marks `QueryPlan.expressions` final to forbid sub classes overriding it to exclude some expressions. Currently only `Generate` override it, we can use `producedAttributes` to fix the unresolved attribute problem for it.
Note that this PR doesn't fix the problem in #11497
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11532 from cloud-fan/generate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
Seq(("id1", "value1")).toDF("key", "value").registerTempTable("src")
sqlContext.sql("SELECT t1.* FROM src LATERAL VIEW explode(map('key1', 100, 'key2', 200)) t1 AS key, value")
```
Results in following logical plan
```
Project [key#2,value#3]
+- Generate explode(HiveGenericUDF#org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.udf.generic.GenericUDFMap(key1,100,key2,200)), true, false, Some(genoutput), [key#2,value#3]
+- SubqueryAlias src
+- Project [_1#0 AS key#2,_2#1 AS value#3]
+- LocalRelation [_1#0,_2#1], [[id1,value1]]
```
The above query fails with following runtime error.
```
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BaseGenericInternalRow$class.getUTF8String(rows.scala:46)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericInternalRow.getUTF8String(rows.scala:221)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificUnsafeProjection.apply(generated.java:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.Generate$$anonfun$doExecute$1$$anonfun$apply$9.apply(Generate.scala:98)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.Generate$$anonfun$doExecute$1$$anonfun$apply$9.apply(Generate.scala:96)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:370)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:370)
at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:742)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1194)
<stack-trace omitted.....>
```
In this case the generated outputs are wrongly resolved from its child (LocalRelation) due to
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala#L537-L548
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
Added unit tests in hive/SQLQuerySuite and AnalysisSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#11497 from dilipbiswal/spark-13651.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Today we have `analysis.Catalog` and `catalog.Catalog`. In the future the former will call the latter. When that happens, if both of them are still called `Catalog` it will be very confusing. This patch renames the latter `ExternalCatalog` because it is expected to talk to external systems.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11526 from andrewor14/rename-catalog.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is for supporting SQL generation for cube, rollup and grouping sets.
For example, a query using rollup:
```SQL
SELECT count(*) as cnt, key % 5, grouping_id() FROM t1 GROUP BY key % 5 WITH ROLLUP
```
Original logical plan:
```
Aggregate [(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L,grouping__id#46],
[(count(1),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS cnt#43L,
(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L AS _c1#45L,
grouping__id#46 AS _c2#44]
+- Expand [List(key#17L, value#18, (key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L, 0),
List(key#17L, value#18, null, 1)],
[key#17L,value#18,(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L,grouping__id#46]
+- Project [key#17L,
value#18,
(key#17L % cast(5 as bigint)) AS (key#17L % cast(5 as bigint))#47L]
+- Subquery t1
+- Relation[key#17L,value#18] ParquetRelation
```
Converted SQL:
```SQL
SELECT count( 1) AS `cnt`,
(`t1`.`key` % CAST(5 AS BIGINT)),
grouping_id() AS `_c2`
FROM `default`.`t1`
GROUP BY (`t1`.`key` % CAST(5 AS BIGINT))
GROUPING SETS (((`t1`.`key` % CAST(5 AS BIGINT))), ())
```
#### How was the this patch tested?
Added eight test cases in `LogicalPlanToSQLSuite`.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#11283 from gatorsmile/groupingSetsToSQL.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch simply moves things to existing package `o.a.s.sql.catalyst.parser` in an effort to reduce the size of the diff in #11048. This is conceptually the same as a recently merged patch #11482.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11506 from andrewor14/parser-package.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is support SQL generation for subquery expressions, which will be replaced to a SubqueryHolder inside SQLBuilder recursively.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11453 from davies/sql_subquery.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support visualization for subquery in SQL web UI, also improve the explain of subquery, especially when it's used together with whole stage codegen.
For example:
```python
>>> sqlContext.range(100).registerTempTable("range")
>>> sqlContext.sql("select id / (select sum(id) from range) from range where id > (select id from range limit 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias(('id / subquery#9), None)]
: +- 'SubqueryAlias subquery#9
: +- 'Project [unresolvedalias('sum('id), None)]
: +- 'UnresolvedRelation `range`, None
+- 'Filter ('id > subquery#8)
: +- 'SubqueryAlias subquery#8
: +- 'GlobalLimit 1
: +- 'LocalLimit 1
: +- 'Project [unresolvedalias('id, None)]
: +- 'UnresolvedRelation `range`, None
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `range`, None
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
(id / scalarsubquery()): double
Project [(cast(id#0L as double) / cast(subquery#9 as double)) AS (id / scalarsubquery())#11]
: +- SubqueryAlias subquery#9
: +- Aggregate [(sum(id#0L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS sum(id)#10L]
: +- SubqueryAlias range
: +- Range 0, 100, 1, 4, [id#0L]
+- Filter (id#0L > subquery#8)
: +- SubqueryAlias subquery#8
: +- GlobalLimit 1
: +- LocalLimit 1
: +- Project [id#0L]
: +- SubqueryAlias range
: +- Range 0, 100, 1, 4, [id#0L]
+- SubqueryAlias range
+- Range 0, 100, 1, 4, [id#0L]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [(cast(id#0L as double) / cast(subquery#9 as double)) AS (id / scalarsubquery())#11]
: +- SubqueryAlias subquery#9
: +- Aggregate [(sum(id#0L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS sum(id)#10L]
: +- Range 0, 100, 1, 4, [id#0L]
+- Filter (id#0L > subquery#8)
: +- SubqueryAlias subquery#8
: +- GlobalLimit 1
: +- LocalLimit 1
: +- Project [id#0L]
: +- Range 0, 100, 1, 4, [id#0L]
+- Range 0, 100, 1, 4, [id#0L]
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [(cast(id#0L as double) / cast(subquery#9 as double)) AS (id / scalarsubquery())#11]
: : +- Subquery subquery#9
: : +- WholeStageCodegen
: : : +- TungstenAggregate(key=[], functions=[(sum(id#0L),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[sum(id)#10L])
: : : +- INPUT
: : +- Exchange SinglePartition, None
: : +- WholeStageCodegen
: : : +- TungstenAggregate(key=[], functions=[(sum(id#0L),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[sum#14L])
: : : +- Range 0, 1, 4, 100, [id#0L]
: +- Filter (id#0L > subquery#8)
: : +- Subquery subquery#8
: : +- CollectLimit 1
: : +- WholeStageCodegen
: : : +- Project [id#0L]
: : : +- Range 0, 1, 4, 100, [id#0L]
: +- Range 0, 1, 4, 100, [id#0L]
```
The web UI looks like:
This PR also change the tree structure of WholeStageCodegen to make it consistent than others. Before this change, Both WholeStageCodegen and InputAdapter hold a references to the same plans, those could be updated without notify another, causing problems, this is discovered by #11403 .
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, also manual tests with the example query, check the explain and web UI.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11417 from davies/viz_subquery.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-6990, `dev/lint-java` keeps Java code healthy and helps PR review by saving much time.
This issue aims remove unused imports from Java/Scala code and add `UnusedImports` checkstyle rule to help developers.
## How was this patch tested?
```
./dev/lint-java
./build/sbt compile
```
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11438 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-13583.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make some cross-cutting code improvements according to static analysis. These are individually up for discussion since they exist in separate commits that can be reverted. The changes are broadly:
- Inner class should be static
- Mismatched hashCode/equals
- Overflow in compareTo
- Unchecked warnings
- Misuse of assert, vs junit.assert
- get(a) + getOrElse(b) -> getOrElse(a,b)
- Array/String .size -> .length (occasionally, -> .isEmpty / .nonEmpty) to avoid implicit conversions
- Dead code
- tailrec
- exists(_ == ) -> contains find + nonEmpty -> exists filter + size -> count
- reduce(_+_) -> sum map + flatten -> map
The most controversial may be .size -> .length simply because of its size. It is intended to avoid implicits that might be expensive in some places.
## How was the this patch tested?
Existing Jenkins unit tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#11292 from srowen/SPARK-13423.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#11479 [SPARK-13627] broke 2.10 compatibility: [2.10-Build](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/spark-master-compile-maven-scala-2.10/292/console)
At this moment, we need to support both 2.10 and 2.11.
This PR recovers some deprecated methods which were replace by [SPARK-13627].
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins build: Both 2.10, 2.11.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11488 from dongjoon-hyun/hotfix_compatibility_with_2.10.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13466
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With column pruning rule in optimizer, some Project operators will become redundant. We should remove these redundant Projects.
For an example query:
val input = LocalRelation('key.int, 'value.string)
val query =
Project(Seq($"x.key", $"y.key"),
Join(
SubqueryAlias("x", input),
BroadcastHint(SubqueryAlias("y", input)), Inner, None))
After the first run of column pruning, it would like:
Project(Seq($"x.key", $"y.key"),
Join(
Project(Seq($"x.key"), SubqueryAlias("x", input)),
Project(Seq($"y.key"), <-- inserted by the rule
BroadcastHint(SubqueryAlias("y", input))),
Inner, None))
Actually we don't need the outside Project now. This patch will remove it:
Join(
Project(Seq($"x.key"), SubqueryAlias("x", input)),
Project(Seq($"y.key"),
BroadcastHint(SubqueryAlias("y", input))),
Inner, None)
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit test is added into ColumnPruningSuite.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11341 from viirya/remove-redundant-project.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13635
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LimitPushdown optimizer rule has been disabled due to no whole-stage codegen for Limit. As we have whole-stage codegen for Limit now, we should enable it.
## How was this patch tested?
As we only re-enable LimitPushdown optimizer rule, no need to add new tests for it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11483 from viirya/enable-limitpushdown.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix the following deprecation warnings.
* MethodSymbolApi.paramss--> paramLists
* AnnotationApi.tpe -> tree.tpe
* BufferLike.readOnly -> toList.
* StandardNames.nme -> termNames
* scala.tools.nsc.interpreter.AbstractFileClassLoader -> scala.reflect.internal.util.AbstractFileClassLoader
* TypeApi.declarations-> decls
## How was this patch tested?
Check the compile build log and pass the tests.
```
./build/sbt
```
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11479 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-13627.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `trait GroupingAnalytics` only has one implementation, it's an unnecessary abstraction. This PR removes it, and does some code simplification when resolving `GroupingSet`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11469 from cloud-fan/groupingset.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to prune unnecessary columns when the operator is `MapPartitions`. The solution is to add an extra `Project` in the child node.
For the other two operators `AppendColumns` and `MapGroups`, it sounds doable. More discussions are required. The major reason is the current implementation of the `inputPlan` of `groupBy` is based on the child of `AppendColumns`. It might be a bug? Thus, will submit a separate PR.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case in ColumnPruningSuite to verify the rule. Added another test case in DatasetSuite.scala to verify the data.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11460 from gatorsmile/datasetPruningNew.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change in class FormatNumber to make it work irrespective of locale.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: lgieron <lgieron@gmail.com>
Closes#11396 from lgieron/SPARK-13515_Fix_Format_Number.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR defer the resolution from a id of dictionary to value until the column is actually accessed (inside getInt/getLong), this is very useful for those columns and rows that are filtered out. It's also useful for binary type, we will not need to copy all the byte arrays.
This PR also change the underlying type for small decimal that could be fit within a Int, in order to use getInt() to lookup the value from IntDictionary.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually test TPCDS Q7 with scale factor 10, saw about 30% improvements (after PR #11274).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11437 from davies/decode_dict.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for implementing whole state codegen for sort. Builds heaving on nongli 's PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11008 (which actually implements the feature), and adds the following changes on top:
- [x] Generated code updates peak execution memory metrics
- [x] Unit tests in `WholeStageCodegenSuite` and `SQLMetricsSuite`
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests in `WholeStageCodegenSuite` and `SQLMetricsSuite`. Further, all existing sort tests should pass.
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#11359 from sameeragarwal/sort-codegen.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After analysis by Analyzer, two operators could have alias. They are `Project` and `Aggregate`. So far, we only rewrite and propagate constraints if `Alias` is defined in `Project`. This PR is to resolve this issue in `Aggregate`.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case for `Aggregate` in `ConstraintPropagationSuite`.
marmbrus sameeragarwal
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11422 from gatorsmile/validConstraintsInUnaryNodes.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Nested classes defined within Scala objects are translated into Java static nested classes. Unlike inner classes, they don't need outer scopes. But the analyzer still thinks that an outer scope is required.
This PR fixes this issue simply by checking whether a nested class is static before looking up its outer scope.
## How was this patch tested?
A test case is added to `DatasetSuite`. It checks contents of a Dataset whose element type is a nested class declared in a Scala object.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#11421 from liancheng/spark-13540-object-as-outer-scope.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, BroadcastNestedLoopJoin is implemented for worst case, it's too slow, very easy to hang forever. This PR will create fast path for some joinType and buildSide, also improve the worst case (will use much less memory than before).
Before this PR, one task requires O(N*K) + O(K) in worst cases, N is number of rows from one partition of streamed table, it could hang the job (because of GC).
In order to workaround this for InnerJoin, we have to disable auto-broadcast, switch to CartesianProduct: This could be workaround for InnerJoin, see https://forums.databricks.com/questions/6747/how-do-i-get-a-cartesian-product-of-a-huge-dataset.html
In this PR, we will have fast path for these joins :
InnerJoin with BuildLeft or BuildRight
LeftOuterJoin with BuildRight
RightOuterJoin with BuildLeft
LeftSemi with BuildRight
These fast paths are all stream based (take one pass on streamed table), required O(1) memory.
All other join types and build types will take two pass on streamed table, one pass to find the matched rows that includes streamed part, which require O(1) memory, another pass to find the rows from build table that does not have a matched row from streamed table, which required O(K) memory, K is the number rows from build side, one bit per row, should be much smaller than the memory for broadcast. The following join types work in this way:
LeftOuterJoin with BuildLeft
RightOuterJoin with BuildRight
FullOuterJoin with BuildLeft or BuildRight
LeftSemi with BuildLeft
This PR also added tests for all the join types for BroadcastNestedLoopJoin.
After this PR, for InnerJoin with one small table, BroadcastNestedLoopJoin should be faster than CartesianProduct, we don't need that workaround anymore.
## How was the this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11328 from davies/nested_loop.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Predicates shouldn't be pushed through project with nondeterministic field(s).
See https://github.com/graphframes/graphframes/pull/23 and SPARK-13473 for more details.
This PR targets master, branch-1.6, and branch-1.5.
## How was this patch tested?
A test case is added in `FilterPushdownSuite`. It constructs a query plan where a filter is over a project with a nondeterministic field. Optimized query plan shouldn't change in this case.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#11348 from liancheng/spark-13473-no-ppd-through-nondeterministic-project-field.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR mostly rewrite the ColumnPruning rule to support most of the SQL logical plans (except those for Dataset).
This PR also fix a bug in Generate, it should always output UnsafeRow, added an regression test for that.
## How was this patch tested?
This is test by unit tests, also manually test with TPCDS Q78, which could prune all unused columns successfully, improved the performance by 78% (from 22s to 12s).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11354 from davies/fix_column_pruning.
This PR adds a new abstraction called an `ExpressionSet` which attempts to canonicalize expressions to remove cosmetic differences. Deterministic expressions that are in the set after canonicalization will always return the same answer given the same input (i.e. false positives should not be possible). However, it is possible that two canonical expressions that are not equal will in fact return the same answer given any input (i.e. false negatives are possible).
```scala
val set = AttributeSet('a + 1 :: 1 + 'a :: Nil)
set.iterator => Iterator('a + 1)
set.contains('a + 1) => true
set.contains(1 + 'a) => true
set.contains('a + 2) => false
```
Other relevant changes include:
- Since this concept overlaps with the existing `semanticEquals` and `semanticHash`, those functions are also ported to this new infrastructure.
- A memoized `canonicalized` version of the expression is added as a `lazy val` to `Expression` and is used by both `semanticEquals` and `ExpressionSet`.
- A set of unit tests for `ExpressionSet` are added
- Tests which expect `semanticEquals` to be less intelligent than it now is are updated.
As a followup, we should consider auditing the places where we do `O(n)` `semanticEquals` operations and replace them with `ExpressionSet`. We should also consider consolidating `AttributeSet` as a specialized factory for an `ExpressionSet.`
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#11338 from marmbrus/expressionSet.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13383
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we do column pruning in Optimizer, we put additional Project on top of a logical plan. However, when we already wrap a BroadcastHint on a logical plan, the added Project will hide BroadcastHint after later execution.
We should take care of BroadcastHint when we do column pruning.
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit test is added.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11260 from viirya/keep-broadcasthint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR pull all the keywords (and some others) from ExpressionParser.g as KeywordParser.g, because ExpressionParser is too large to compile.
## How was the this patch tested?
unit test, maven build
Closes#11329
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11331 from davies/split_expr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR mostly rewrite the ColumnPruning rule to support most of the SQL logical plans (except those for Dataset).
## How was the this patch tested?
This is test by unit tests, also manually test with TPCDS Q78, which could prune all unused columns successfully, improved the performance by 78% (from 22s to 12s).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11256 from davies/fix_column_pruning.
The current implementation of statistics of UnaryNode does not considering output (for example, Project may product much less columns than it's child), we should considering it to have a better guess.
We usually only join with few columns from a parquet table, the size of projected plan could be much smaller than the original parquet files. Having a better guess of size help we choose between broadcast join or sort merge join.
After this PR, I saw a few queries choose broadcast join other than sort merge join without turning spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold for every query, ended up with about 6-8X improvements on end-to-end time.
We use `defaultSize` of DataType to estimate the size of a column, currently For DecimalType/StringType/BinaryType and UDT, we are over-estimate too much (4096 Bytes), so this PR change them to some more reasonable values. Here are the new defaultSize for them:
DecimalType: 8 or 16 bytes, based on the precision
StringType: 20 bytes
BinaryType: 100 bytes
UDF: default size of SQL type
These numbers are not perfect (hard to have a perfect number for them), but should be better than 4096.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11210 from davies/statics.
The type checking functions of `If` and `UnwrapOption` are fixed to eliminate spurious failures. `UnwrapOption` was checking for an input of `ObjectType` but `ObjectType`'s accept function was hard coded to return `false`. `If`'s type check was returning a false negative in the case that the two options differed only by nullability.
Tests added:
- an end-to-end regression test is added to `DatasetSuite` for the reported failure.
- all the unit tests in `ExpressionEncoderSuite` are augmented to also confirm successful analysis. These tests are actually what pointed out the additional issues with `If` resolution.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#11316 from marmbrus/datasetOptions.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Ensure that all built-in expressions can be mapped to its SQL representation if there is one (e.g. ScalaUDF doesn't have a SQL representation). The function lists are from the expression list in `FunctionRegistry`.
window functions, grouping sets functions (`cube`, `rollup`, `grouping`, `grouping_id`), generator functions (`explode` and `json_tuple`) are covered by separate JIRA and PRs. Thus, this PR does not cover them. Except these functions, all the built-in expressions are covered. For details, see the list in `ExpressionToSQLSuite`.
Fixed a few issues. For example, the `prettyName` of `approx_count_distinct` is not right. The `sql` of `hash` function is not right, since the `hash` function does not accept `seed`.
Additionally, also correct the order of expressions in `FunctionRegistry` so that people are easier to find which functions are missing.
cc liancheng
#### How was the this patch tested?
Added two test cases in LogicalPlanToSQLSuite for covering `not like` and `not in`.
Added a new test suite `ExpressionToSQLSuite` to cover the functions:
1. misc non-aggregate functions + complex type creators + null expressions
2. math functions
3. aggregate functions
4. string functions
5. date time functions + calendar interval
6. collection functions
7. misc functions
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11314 from gatorsmile/expressionToSQL.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix all typos in all markdown files under `docs` module,
and fixes similar typos in other comments, too.
## How was the this patch tested?
manual tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11300 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_fix_typos.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13321
The following SQL can not be parsed with current parser:
SELECT `u_1`.`id` FROM (((SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) AS u_1
We should fix it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11204 from viirya/nested-union.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds equality operators to UDT classes so that they can be correctly tested for dataType equality during union operations.
This was previously causing `"AnalysisException: u"unresolved operator 'Union;""` when trying to unionAll two dataframes with UDT columns as below.
```
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql import types
schema = types.StructType([types.StructField("point", PythonOnlyUDT(), True)])
a = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(1.0, 2.0)]], schema)
b = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(3.0, 4.0)]], schema)
c = a.unionAll(b)
```
## How was the this patch tested?
Tested using two unit tests in sql/test.py and the DataFrameSuite.
Additional information here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13410
Author: Franklyn D'souza <franklynd@gmail.com>
Closes#11279 from damnMeddlingKid/udt-union-all.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a step towards merging `SQLContext` and `HiveContext`. A new internal Catalog API was introduced in #10982 and extended in #11069. This patch introduces an implementation of this API using `HiveClient`, an existing interface to Hive. It also extends `HiveClient` with additional calls to Hive that are needed to complete the catalog implementation.
*Where should I start reviewing?* The new catalog introduced is `HiveCatalog`. This class is relatively simple because it just calls `HiveClientImpl`, where most of the new logic is. I would not start with `HiveClient`, `HiveQl`, or `HiveMetastoreCatalog`, which are modified mainly because of a refactor.
*Why is this patch so big?* I had to refactor HiveClient to remove an intermediate representation of databases, tables, partitions etc. After this refactor `CatalogTable` convert directly to and from `HiveTable` (etc.). Otherwise we would have to first convert `CatalogTable` to the intermediate representation and then convert that to HiveTable, which is messy.
The new class hierarchy is as follows:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.Catalog
- org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.InMemoryCatalog
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveCatalog
```
Note that, as of this patch, none of these classes are currently used anywhere yet. This will come in the future before the Spark 2.0 release.
## How was the this patch tested?
All existing unit tests, and HiveCatalogSuite that extends CatalogTestCases.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11293 from rxin/hive-catalog.
Quite a few Spark SQL join operators broadcast one side of the join to all nodes. The are a few problems with this:
- This conflates broadcasting (a data exchange) with joining. Data exchanges should be managed by a different operator.
- All these nodes implement their own (duplicate) broadcasting logic.
- Re-use of indices is quite hard.
This PR defines both a ```BroadcastDistribution``` and ```BroadcastPartitioning```, these contain a `BroadcastMode`. The `BroadcastMode` defines the way in which we transform the Array of `InternalRow`'s into an index. We currently support the following `BroadcastMode`'s:
- IdentityBroadcastMode: This broadcasts the rows in their original form.
- HashSetBroadcastMode: This applies a projection to the input rows, deduplicates these rows and broadcasts the resulting `Set`.
- HashedRelationBroadcastMode: This transforms the input rows into a `HashedRelation`, and broadcasts this index.
To match this distribution we implement a ```BroadcastExchange``` operator which will perform the broadcast for us, and have ```EnsureRequirements``` plan this operator. The old Exchange operator has been renamed into ShuffleExchange in order to clearly separate between Shuffled and Broadcasted exchanges. Finally the classes in Exchange.scala have been moved to a dedicated package.
cc rxin davies
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11083 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13136.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes some minor issues (documentation, test flakiness, test organization) with #11190, which was merged earlier tonight.
## How was the this patch tested?
unit tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11285 from rxin/subquery.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch renames logical.Subquery to logical.SubqueryAlias, which is a more appropriate name for this operator (versus subqueries as expressions).
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11288 from rxin/SPARK-13420.
This PR introduces several major changes:
1. Replacing `Expression.prettyString` with `Expression.sql`
The `prettyString` method is mostly an internal, developer faced facility for debugging purposes, and shouldn't be exposed to users.
1. Using SQL-like representation as column names for selected fields that are not named expression (back-ticks and double quotes should be removed)
Before, we were using `prettyString` as column names when possible, and sometimes the result column names can be weird. Here are several examples:
Expression | `prettyString` | `sql` | Note
------------------ | -------------- | ---------- | ---------------
`a && b` | `a && b` | `a AND b` |
`a.getField("f")` | `a[f]` | `a.f` | `a` is a struct
1. Adding trait `NonSQLExpression` extending from `Expression` for expressions that don't have a SQL representation (e.g. Scala UDF/UDAF and Java/Scala object expressions used for encoders)
`NonSQLExpression.sql` may return an arbitrary user facing string representation of the expression.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10757 from liancheng/spark-12799.simplify-expression-string-methods.
```scala
// case 1: missing sort columns are resolvable if join is true
sql("SELECT explode(a) AS val, b FROM data WHERE b < 2 order by val, c")
// case 2: missing sort columns are not resolvable if join is false. Thus, issue an error message in this case
sql("SELECT explode(a) AS val FROM data order by val, c")
```
When sort columns are not in `Generate`, we can resolve them when `join` is equal to `true`. Still trying to add more test cases for the other `UnaryNode` types.
Could you review the changes? davies cloud-fan Thanks!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11198 from gatorsmile/missingInSort.
Conversion of outer joins, if the predicates in filter conditions can restrict the result sets so that all null-supplying rows are eliminated.
- `full outer` -> `inner` if both sides have such predicates
- `left outer` -> `inner` if the right side has such predicates
- `right outer` -> `inner` if the left side has such predicates
- `full outer` -> `left outer` if only the left side has such predicates
- `full outer` -> `right outer` if only the right side has such predicates
If applicable, this can greatly improve the performance, since outer join is much slower than inner join, full outer join is much slower than left/right outer join.
The original PR is https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10542
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10567 from gatorsmile/outerJoinEliminationByFilterCond.
This PR adds support for rewriting constraints if there are aliases in the query plan. For e.g., if there is a query of form `SELECT a, a AS b`, any constraints on `a` now also apply to `b`.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13091
cc marmbrus
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#11144 from sameeragarwal/alias.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13384
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we de-duplicate attributes in Analyzer, we create new attributes. However, we don't keep original qualifiers. Some plans will be failed to analysed. We should keep original qualifiers in new attributes.
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit test is added.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11261 from viirya/keep-attr-qualifiers.
`rand` and `randn` functions with a `seed` argument are commonly used. Based on the common sense, the results of `rand` and `randn` should be deterministic if the `seed` parameter value is provided. For example, in MS SQL Server, it also has a function `rand`. Regarding the parameter `seed`, the description is like: ```Seed is an integer expression (tinyint, smallint, or int) that gives the seed value. If seed is not specified, the SQL Server Database Engine assigns a seed value at random. For a specified seed value, the result returned is always the same.```
Update: the current implementation is unable to generate deterministic results when the partitions are not fixed. This PR documents this issue in the function descriptions.
jkbradley hit an issue and provided an example in the following JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13333
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11232 from gatorsmile/randSeed.
Currently, the columns in projects of Expand that are not used by Aggregate are not pruned, this PR fix that.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11225 from davies/fix_pruning_expand.
Add `LazilyGenerateOrdering` to support generated ordering for `RangePartitioner` of `Exchange` instead of `InterpretedOrdering`.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#10894 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-12976.
Using GroupingSets will generate a wrong result when Aggregate Functions containing GroupBy columns.
This PR is to fix it. Since the code changes are very small. Maybe we also can merge it to 1.6
For example, the following query returns a wrong result:
```scala
sql("select course, sum(earnings) as sum from courseSales group by course, earnings" +
" grouping sets((), (course), (course, earnings))" +
" order by course, sum").show()
```
Before the fix, the results are like
```
[null,null]
[Java,null]
[Java,20000.0]
[Java,30000.0]
[dotNET,null]
[dotNET,5000.0]
[dotNET,10000.0]
[dotNET,48000.0]
```
After the fix, the results become correct:
```
[null,113000.0]
[Java,20000.0]
[Java,30000.0]
[Java,50000.0]
[dotNET,5000.0]
[dotNET,10000.0]
[dotNET,48000.0]
[dotNET,63000.0]
```
UPDATE: This PR also deprecated the external column: GROUPING__ID.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11100 from gatorsmile/groupingSets.
This patch adds a new optimizer rule for performing limit pushdown. Limits will now be pushed down in two cases:
- If a limit is on top of a `UNION ALL` operator, then a partition-local limit operator will be pushed to each of the union operator's children.
- If a limit is on top of an `OUTER JOIN` then a partition-local limit will be pushed to one side of the join. For `LEFT OUTER` and `RIGHT OUTER` joins, the limit will be pushed to the left and right side, respectively. For `FULL OUTER` join, we will only push limits when at most one of the inputs is already limited: if one input is limited we will push a smaller limit on top of it and if neither input is limited then we will limit the input which is estimated to be larger.
These optimizations were proposed previously by gatorsmile in #10451 and #10454, but those earlier PRs were closed and deferred for later because at that time Spark's physical `Limit` operator would trigger a full shuffle to perform global limits so there was a chance that pushdowns could actually harm performance by causing additional shuffles/stages. In #7334, we split the `Limit` operator into separate `LocalLimit` and `GlobalLimit` operators, so we can now push down only local limits (which don't require extra shuffles). This patch is based on both of gatorsmile's patches, with changes and simplifications due to partition-local-limiting.
When we push down the limit, we still keep the original limit in place, so we need a mechanism to ensure that the optimizer rule doesn't keep pattern-matching once the limit has been pushed down. In order to handle this, this patch adds a `maxRows` method to `SparkPlan` which returns the maximum number of rows that the plan can compute, then defines the pushdown rules to only push limits to children if the children's maxRows are greater than the limit's maxRows. This idea is carried over from #10451; see that patch for additional discussion.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#11121 from JoshRosen/limit-pushdown-2.
The java `Calendar` object is expensive to create. I have a sub query like this `SELECT a, b, c FROM table UV WHERE (datediff(UV.visitDate, '1997-01-01')>=0 AND datediff(UV.visitDate, '2015-01-01')<=0))`
The table stores `visitDate` as String type and has 3 billion records. A `Calendar` object is created every time `DateTimeUtils.stringToDate` is called. By reusing the `Calendar` object, I saw about 20 seconds performance improvement for this stage.
Author: Carson Wang <carson.wang@intel.com>
Closes#11090 from carsonwang/SPARK-13185.
The current implementation of ResolveSortReferences can only push one missing attributes into it's child, it failed to analyze TPCDS Q98, because of there are two missing attributes in that (one from Window, another from Aggregate).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11153 from davies/resolve_sort.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13277
There is an ANTLR warning during compilation:
warning(200): org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlParser.g:938:7:
Decision can match input such as "KW_USING Identifier" using multiple alternatives: 2, 3
As a result, alternative(s) 3 were disabled for that input
This patch is to fix it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11168 from viirya/fix-parser-using.
The parser currently parses the following strings without a hitch:
* Table Identifier:
* `a.b.c` should fail, but results in the following table identifier `a.b`
* `table!#` should fail, but results in the following table identifier `table`
* Expression
* `1+2 r+e` should fail, but results in the following expression `1 + 2`
This PR fixes this by adding terminated rules for both expression parsing and table identifier parsing.
cc cloud-fan (we discussed this in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649) jayadevanmurali (this causes your PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051 to fail)
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11159 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13276.
Grouping() returns a column is aggregated or not, grouping_id() returns the aggregation levels.
grouping()/grouping_id() could be used with window function, but does not work in having/sort clause, will be fixed by another PR.
The GROUPING__ID/grouping_id() in Hive is wrong (according to docs), we also did it wrongly, this PR change that to match the behavior in most databases (also the docs of Hive).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10677 from davies/grouping.
Some analysis rules generate aliases or auxiliary attribute references with the same name but different expression IDs. For example, `ResolveAggregateFunctions` introduces `havingCondition` and `aggOrder`, and `DistinctAggregationRewriter` introduces `gid`.
This is OK for normal query execution since these attribute references get expression IDs. However, it's troublesome when converting resolved query plans back to SQL query strings since expression IDs are erased.
Here's an example Spark 1.6.0 snippet for illustration:
```scala
sqlContext.range(10).select('id as 'a, 'id as 'b).registerTempTable("t")
sqlContext.sql("SELECT SUM(a) FROM t GROUP BY a, b ORDER BY COUNT(a), COUNT(b)").explain(true)
```
The above code produces the following resolved plan:
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
_c0: bigint
Project [_c0#101L]
+- Sort [aggOrder#102L ASC,aggOrder#103L ASC], true
+- Aggregate [a#47L,b#48L], [(sum(a#47L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS _c0#101L,(count(a#47L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS aggOrder#102L,(count(b#48L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS aggOrder#103L]
+- Subquery t
+- Project [id#46L AS a#47L,id#46L AS b#48L]
+- LogicalRDD [id#46L], MapPartitionsRDD[44] at range at <console>:26
```
Here we can see that both aggregate expressions in `ORDER BY` are extracted into an `Aggregate` operator, and both of them are named `aggOrder` with different expression IDs.
The solution is to automatically add the expression IDs into the attribute name for the Alias and AttributeReferences that are generated by Analyzer in SQL Generation.
In this PR, it also resolves another issue. Users could use the same name as the internally generated names. The duplicate names should not cause name ambiguity. When resolving the column, Catalyst should not pick the column that is internally generated.
Could you review the solution? marmbrus liancheng
I did not set the newly added flag for all the alias and attribute reference generated by Analyzers. Please let me know if I should do it? Thank you!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11050 from gatorsmile/namingConflicts.
This PR improve the lookup of BytesToBytesMap by:
1. Generate code for calculate the hash code of grouping keys.
2. Do not use MemoryLocation, fetch the baseObject and offset for key and value directly (remove the indirection).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11010 from davies/gen_map.
nullability should only be considered as an optimization rather than part of the type system, so instead of failing analysis for mismatch nullability, we should pass analysis and add runtime null check.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11035 from cloud-fan/ignore-nullability.
This patch changes the implementation of the physical `Limit` operator so that it relies on the `Exchange` operator to perform data movement rather than directly using `ShuffledRDD`. In addition to improving efficiency, this lays the necessary groundwork for further optimization of limit, such as limit pushdown or whole-stage codegen.
At a high-level, this replaces the old physical `Limit` operator with two new operators, `LocalLimit` and `GlobalLimit`. `LocalLimit` performs per-partition limits, while `GlobalLimit` applies the final limit to a single partition; `GlobalLimit`'s declares that its `requiredInputDistribution` is `SinglePartition`, which will cause the planner to use an `Exchange` to perform the appropriate shuffles. Thus, a logical `Limit` appearing in the middle of a query plan will be expanded into `LocalLimit -> Exchange to one partition -> GlobalLimit`.
In the old code, calling `someDataFrame.limit(100).collect()` or `someDataFrame.take(100)` would actually skip the shuffle and use a fast-path which used `executeTake()` in order to avoid computing all partitions in case only a small number of rows were requested. This patch preserves this optimization by treating logical `Limit` operators specially when they appear as the terminal operator in a query plan: if a `Limit` is the final operator, then we will plan a special `CollectLimit` physical operator which implements the old `take()`-based logic.
In order to be able to match on operators only at the root of the query plan, this patch introduces a special `ReturnAnswer` logical operator which functions similar to `BroadcastHint`: this dummy operator is inserted at the root of the optimized logical plan before invoking the physical planner, allowing the planner to pattern-match on it.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#7334 from JoshRosen/remove-copy-in-limit.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12939
Now we will catch `ObjectOperator` in `Analyzer` and resolve the `fromRowExpression/deserializer` inside it. Also update the `MapGroups` and `CoGroup` to pass in `dataAttributes`, so that we can correctly resolve value deserializer(the `child.output` contains both groupking key and values, which may mess things up if they have same-name attribtues). End-to-end tests are added.
follow-ups:
* remove encoders from typed aggregate expression.
* completely remove resolve/bind in `ExpressionEncoder`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10852 from cloud-fan/bug.
This patch incorporates review feedback from #11069, which is already merged.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11080 from andrewor14/catalog-follow-ups.
Spark SQL should collapse adjacent `Repartition` operators and only keep the last one.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#11064 from JoshRosen/collapse-repartition.
This is a small addendum to #10762 to make the code more robust again future changes.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11070 from rxin/SPARK-12828-natural-join.
This is a step towards consolidating `SQLContext` and `HiveContext`.
This patch extends the existing Catalog API added in #10982 to include methods for handling table partitions. In particular, a partition is identified by `PartitionSpec`, which is just a `Map[String, String]`. The Catalog is still not used by anything yet, but its API is now more or less complete and an implementation is fully tested.
About 200 lines are test code.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11069 from andrewor14/catalog.
The ```SparkSqlLexer``` currently swallows characters which have not been defined in the grammar. This causes problems with SQL commands, such as: ```add jar file:///tmp/ab/TestUDTF.jar```. In this example the `````` is swallowed.
This PR adds an extra Lexer rule to handle such input, and makes a tiny modification to the ```ASTNode```.
cc davies liancheng
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11052 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13157.
Based on the semantics of a query, we can derive a number of data constraints on output of each (logical or physical) operator. For instance, if a filter defines `‘a > 10`, we know that the output data of this filter satisfies 2 constraints:
1. `‘a > 10`
2. `isNotNull(‘a)`
This PR proposes a possible way of keeping track of these constraints and propagating them in the logical plan, which can then help us build more advanced optimizations (such as pruning redundant filters, optimizing joins, among others). We define constraints as a set of (implicitly conjunctive) expressions. For e.g., if a filter operator has constraints = `Set(‘a > 10, ‘b < 100)`, it’s implied that the outputs satisfy both individual constraints (i.e., `‘a > 10` AND `‘b < 100`).
Design Document: https://docs.google.com/a/databricks.com/document/d/1WQRgDurUBV9Y6CWOBS75PQIqJwT-6WftVa18xzm7nCo/edit?usp=sharing
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#10844 from sameeragarwal/constraints.
1. try to avoid the suffix (unique id)
2. remove the comment if there is no code generated.
3. re-arrange the order of functions
4. trop the new line for inlined blocks.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11032 from davies/better_suffix.
The example will throw error like
<console>:20: error: not found: value StructType
Need to add this line:
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Author: Kevin (Sangwoo) Kim <sangwookim.me@gmail.com>
Closes#10141 from swkimme/patch-1.
As benchmarked and discussed here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10786/files#r50038294, benefits from codegen, the declarative aggregate function could be much faster than imperative one.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10960 from davies/stddev.
Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13056
Create a map like
{ "a": "somestring", "b": null}
Query like
SELECT col["b"] FROM t1;
NPE would be thrown.
Author: Daoyuan Wang <daoyuan.wang@intel.com>
Closes#10964 from adrian-wang/npewriter.
This pull request creates an internal catalog API. The creation of this API is the first step towards consolidating SQLContext and HiveContext. I envision we will have two different implementations in Spark 2.0: (1) a simple in-memory implementation, and (2) an implementation based on the current HiveClient (ClientWrapper).
I took a look at what Hive's internal metastore interface/implementation, and then created this API based on it. I believe this is the minimal set needed in order to achieve all the needed functionality.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10982 from rxin/SPARK-13078.
This includes: float, boolean, short, decimal and calendar interval.
Decimal is mapped to long or byte array depending on the size and calendar
interval is mapped to a struct of int and long.
The only remaining type is map. The schema mapping is straightforward but
we might want to revisit how we deal with this in the rest of the execution
engine.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#10961 from nongli/spark-13043.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12705
**Scope:**
This PR is a general fix for sorting reference resolution when the child's `outputSet` does not have the order-by attributes (called, *missing attributes*):
- UnaryNode support is limited to `Project`, `Window`, `Aggregate`, `Distinct`, `Filter`, `RepartitionByExpression`.
- We will not try to resolve the missing references inside a subquery, unless the outputSet of this subquery contains it.
**General Reference Resolution Rules:**
- Jump over the nodes with the following types: `Distinct`, `Filter`, `RepartitionByExpression`. Do not need to add missing attributes. The reason is their `outputSet` is decided by their `inputSet`, which is the `outputSet` of their children.
- Group-by expressions in `Aggregate`: missing order-by attributes are not allowed to be added into group-by expressions since it will change the query result. Thus, in RDBMS, it is not allowed.
- Aggregate expressions in `Aggregate`: if the group-by expressions in `Aggregate` contains the missing attributes but aggregate expressions do not have it, just add them into the aggregate expressions. This can resolve the analysisExceptions thrown by the three TCPDS queries.
- `Project` and `Window` are special. We just need to add the missing attributes to their `projectList`.
**Implementation:**
1. Traverse the whole tree in a pre-order manner to find all the resolvable missing order-by attributes.
2. Traverse the whole tree in a post-order manner to add the found missing order-by attributes to the node if their `inputSet` contains the attributes.
3. If the origins of the missing order-by attributes are different nodes, each pass only resolves the missing attributes that are from the same node.
**Risk:**
Low. This rule will be trigger iff ```!s.resolved && child.resolved``` is true. Thus, very few cases are affected.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10678 from gatorsmile/sortWindows.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12989
In the rule `ExtractWindowExpressions`, we simply replace alias by the corresponding attribute. However, this will cause an issue exposed by the following case:
```scala
val data = Seq(("a", "b", "c", 3), ("c", "b", "a", 3)).toDF("A", "B", "C", "num")
.withColumn("Data", struct("A", "B", "C"))
.drop("A")
.drop("B")
.drop("C")
val winSpec = Window.partitionBy("Data.A", "Data.B").orderBy($"num".desc)
data.select($"*", max("num").over(winSpec) as "max").explain(true)
```
In this case, both `Data.A` and `Data.B` are `alias` in `WindowSpecDefinition`. If we replace these alias expression by their alias names, we are unable to know what they are since they will not be put in `missingExpr` too.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10963 from gatorsmile/seletStarAfterColDrop.
The current implementation is sub-optimal:
* If an expression is always nullable, e.g. `Unhex`, we can still remove null check for children if they are not nullable.
* If an expression has some non-nullable children, we can still remove null check for these children and keep null check for others.
This PR improves this by making the null check elimination more fine-grained.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10987 from cloud-fan/null-check.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12689
DDLParser processes three commands: createTable, describeTable and refreshTable.
This patch migrates the three commands to newly absorbed parser.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Closes#10723 from viirya/migrate-ddl-describe.
