## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix all typos in all markdown files under `docs` module,
and fixes similar typos in other comments, too.
## How was the this patch tested?
manual tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#11300 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_fix_typos.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13321
The following SQL can not be parsed with current parser:
SELECT `u_1`.`id` FROM (((SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) AS u_1
We should fix it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11204 from viirya/nested-union.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds equality operators to UDT classes so that they can be correctly tested for dataType equality during union operations.
This was previously causing `"AnalysisException: u"unresolved operator 'Union;""` when trying to unionAll two dataframes with UDT columns as below.
```
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql import types
schema = types.StructType([types.StructField("point", PythonOnlyUDT(), True)])
a = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(1.0, 2.0)]], schema)
b = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(3.0, 4.0)]], schema)
c = a.unionAll(b)
```
## How was the this patch tested?
Tested using two unit tests in sql/test.py and the DataFrameSuite.
Additional information here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13410
Author: Franklyn D'souza <franklynd@gmail.com>
Closes#11279 from damnMeddlingKid/udt-union-all.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a step towards merging `SQLContext` and `HiveContext`. A new internal Catalog API was introduced in #10982 and extended in #11069. This patch introduces an implementation of this API using `HiveClient`, an existing interface to Hive. It also extends `HiveClient` with additional calls to Hive that are needed to complete the catalog implementation.
*Where should I start reviewing?* The new catalog introduced is `HiveCatalog`. This class is relatively simple because it just calls `HiveClientImpl`, where most of the new logic is. I would not start with `HiveClient`, `HiveQl`, or `HiveMetastoreCatalog`, which are modified mainly because of a refactor.
*Why is this patch so big?* I had to refactor HiveClient to remove an intermediate representation of databases, tables, partitions etc. After this refactor `CatalogTable` convert directly to and from `HiveTable` (etc.). Otherwise we would have to first convert `CatalogTable` to the intermediate representation and then convert that to HiveTable, which is messy.
The new class hierarchy is as follows:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.Catalog
- org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.InMemoryCatalog
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveCatalog
```
Note that, as of this patch, none of these classes are currently used anywhere yet. This will come in the future before the Spark 2.0 release.
## How was the this patch tested?
All existing unit tests, and HiveCatalogSuite that extends CatalogTestCases.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11293 from rxin/hive-catalog.
Quite a few Spark SQL join operators broadcast one side of the join to all nodes. The are a few problems with this:
- This conflates broadcasting (a data exchange) with joining. Data exchanges should be managed by a different operator.
- All these nodes implement their own (duplicate) broadcasting logic.
- Re-use of indices is quite hard.
This PR defines both a ```BroadcastDistribution``` and ```BroadcastPartitioning```, these contain a `BroadcastMode`. The `BroadcastMode` defines the way in which we transform the Array of `InternalRow`'s into an index. We currently support the following `BroadcastMode`'s:
- IdentityBroadcastMode: This broadcasts the rows in their original form.
- HashSetBroadcastMode: This applies a projection to the input rows, deduplicates these rows and broadcasts the resulting `Set`.
- HashedRelationBroadcastMode: This transforms the input rows into a `HashedRelation`, and broadcasts this index.
To match this distribution we implement a ```BroadcastExchange``` operator which will perform the broadcast for us, and have ```EnsureRequirements``` plan this operator. The old Exchange operator has been renamed into ShuffleExchange in order to clearly separate between Shuffled and Broadcasted exchanges. Finally the classes in Exchange.scala have been moved to a dedicated package.
cc rxin davies
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11083 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13136.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes some minor issues (documentation, test flakiness, test organization) with #11190, which was merged earlier tonight.
## How was the this patch tested?
unit tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11285 from rxin/subquery.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch renames logical.Subquery to logical.SubqueryAlias, which is a more appropriate name for this operator (versus subqueries as expressions).
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11288 from rxin/SPARK-13420.
This PR introduces several major changes:
1. Replacing `Expression.prettyString` with `Expression.sql`
The `prettyString` method is mostly an internal, developer faced facility for debugging purposes, and shouldn't be exposed to users.
1. Using SQL-like representation as column names for selected fields that are not named expression (back-ticks and double quotes should be removed)
Before, we were using `prettyString` as column names when possible, and sometimes the result column names can be weird. Here are several examples:
Expression | `prettyString` | `sql` | Note
------------------ | -------------- | ---------- | ---------------
`a && b` | `a && b` | `a AND b` |
`a.getField("f")` | `a[f]` | `a.f` | `a` is a struct
1. Adding trait `NonSQLExpression` extending from `Expression` for expressions that don't have a SQL representation (e.g. Scala UDF/UDAF and Java/Scala object expressions used for encoders)
`NonSQLExpression.sql` may return an arbitrary user facing string representation of the expression.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10757 from liancheng/spark-12799.simplify-expression-string-methods.
```scala
// case 1: missing sort columns are resolvable if join is true
sql("SELECT explode(a) AS val, b FROM data WHERE b < 2 order by val, c")
// case 2: missing sort columns are not resolvable if join is false. Thus, issue an error message in this case
sql("SELECT explode(a) AS val FROM data order by val, c")
```
When sort columns are not in `Generate`, we can resolve them when `join` is equal to `true`. Still trying to add more test cases for the other `UnaryNode` types.
Could you review the changes? davies cloud-fan Thanks!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11198 from gatorsmile/missingInSort.
Conversion of outer joins, if the predicates in filter conditions can restrict the result sets so that all null-supplying rows are eliminated.
- `full outer` -> `inner` if both sides have such predicates
- `left outer` -> `inner` if the right side has such predicates
- `right outer` -> `inner` if the left side has such predicates
- `full outer` -> `left outer` if only the left side has such predicates
- `full outer` -> `right outer` if only the right side has such predicates
If applicable, this can greatly improve the performance, since outer join is much slower than inner join, full outer join is much slower than left/right outer join.
The original PR is https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10542
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10567 from gatorsmile/outerJoinEliminationByFilterCond.
This PR adds support for rewriting constraints if there are aliases in the query plan. For e.g., if there is a query of form `SELECT a, a AS b`, any constraints on `a` now also apply to `b`.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13091
cc marmbrus
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#11144 from sameeragarwal/alias.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13384
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we de-duplicate attributes in Analyzer, we create new attributes. However, we don't keep original qualifiers. Some plans will be failed to analysed. We should keep original qualifiers in new attributes.
## How was the this patch tested?
Unit test is added.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11261 from viirya/keep-attr-qualifiers.
`rand` and `randn` functions with a `seed` argument are commonly used. Based on the common sense, the results of `rand` and `randn` should be deterministic if the `seed` parameter value is provided. For example, in MS SQL Server, it also has a function `rand`. Regarding the parameter `seed`, the description is like: ```Seed is an integer expression (tinyint, smallint, or int) that gives the seed value. If seed is not specified, the SQL Server Database Engine assigns a seed value at random. For a specified seed value, the result returned is always the same.```
Update: the current implementation is unable to generate deterministic results when the partitions are not fixed. This PR documents this issue in the function descriptions.
jkbradley hit an issue and provided an example in the following JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13333
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11232 from gatorsmile/randSeed.
Currently, the columns in projects of Expand that are not used by Aggregate are not pruned, this PR fix that.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11225 from davies/fix_pruning_expand.
Add `LazilyGenerateOrdering` to support generated ordering for `RangePartitioner` of `Exchange` instead of `InterpretedOrdering`.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#10894 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-12976.
Using GroupingSets will generate a wrong result when Aggregate Functions containing GroupBy columns.
This PR is to fix it. Since the code changes are very small. Maybe we also can merge it to 1.6
For example, the following query returns a wrong result:
```scala
sql("select course, sum(earnings) as sum from courseSales group by course, earnings" +
" grouping sets((), (course), (course, earnings))" +
" order by course, sum").show()
```
Before the fix, the results are like
```
[null,null]
[Java,null]
[Java,20000.0]
[Java,30000.0]
[dotNET,null]
[dotNET,5000.0]
[dotNET,10000.0]
[dotNET,48000.0]
```
After the fix, the results become correct:
```
[null,113000.0]
[Java,20000.0]
[Java,30000.0]
[Java,50000.0]
[dotNET,5000.0]
[dotNET,10000.0]
[dotNET,48000.0]
[dotNET,63000.0]
```
UPDATE: This PR also deprecated the external column: GROUPING__ID.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11100 from gatorsmile/groupingSets.
This patch adds a new optimizer rule for performing limit pushdown. Limits will now be pushed down in two cases:
- If a limit is on top of a `UNION ALL` operator, then a partition-local limit operator will be pushed to each of the union operator's children.
- If a limit is on top of an `OUTER JOIN` then a partition-local limit will be pushed to one side of the join. For `LEFT OUTER` and `RIGHT OUTER` joins, the limit will be pushed to the left and right side, respectively. For `FULL OUTER` join, we will only push limits when at most one of the inputs is already limited: if one input is limited we will push a smaller limit on top of it and if neither input is limited then we will limit the input which is estimated to be larger.
These optimizations were proposed previously by gatorsmile in #10451 and #10454, but those earlier PRs were closed and deferred for later because at that time Spark's physical `Limit` operator would trigger a full shuffle to perform global limits so there was a chance that pushdowns could actually harm performance by causing additional shuffles/stages. In #7334, we split the `Limit` operator into separate `LocalLimit` and `GlobalLimit` operators, so we can now push down only local limits (which don't require extra shuffles). This patch is based on both of gatorsmile's patches, with changes and simplifications due to partition-local-limiting.
When we push down the limit, we still keep the original limit in place, so we need a mechanism to ensure that the optimizer rule doesn't keep pattern-matching once the limit has been pushed down. In order to handle this, this patch adds a `maxRows` method to `SparkPlan` which returns the maximum number of rows that the plan can compute, then defines the pushdown rules to only push limits to children if the children's maxRows are greater than the limit's maxRows. This idea is carried over from #10451; see that patch for additional discussion.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#11121 from JoshRosen/limit-pushdown-2.
The java `Calendar` object is expensive to create. I have a sub query like this `SELECT a, b, c FROM table UV WHERE (datediff(UV.visitDate, '1997-01-01')>=0 AND datediff(UV.visitDate, '2015-01-01')<=0))`
The table stores `visitDate` as String type and has 3 billion records. A `Calendar` object is created every time `DateTimeUtils.stringToDate` is called. By reusing the `Calendar` object, I saw about 20 seconds performance improvement for this stage.
Author: Carson Wang <carson.wang@intel.com>
Closes#11090 from carsonwang/SPARK-13185.
The current implementation of ResolveSortReferences can only push one missing attributes into it's child, it failed to analyze TPCDS Q98, because of there are two missing attributes in that (one from Window, another from Aggregate).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11153 from davies/resolve_sort.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13277
There is an ANTLR warning during compilation:
warning(200): org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlParser.g:938:7:
Decision can match input such as "KW_USING Identifier" using multiple alternatives: 2, 3
As a result, alternative(s) 3 were disabled for that input
This patch is to fix it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11168 from viirya/fix-parser-using.
The parser currently parses the following strings without a hitch:
* Table Identifier:
* `a.b.c` should fail, but results in the following table identifier `a.b`
* `table!#` should fail, but results in the following table identifier `table`
* Expression
* `1+2 r+e` should fail, but results in the following expression `1 + 2`
This PR fixes this by adding terminated rules for both expression parsing and table identifier parsing.
cc cloud-fan (we discussed this in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649) jayadevanmurali (this causes your PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051 to fail)
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11159 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13276.
Grouping() returns a column is aggregated or not, grouping_id() returns the aggregation levels.
grouping()/grouping_id() could be used with window function, but does not work in having/sort clause, will be fixed by another PR.
The GROUPING__ID/grouping_id() in Hive is wrong (according to docs), we also did it wrongly, this PR change that to match the behavior in most databases (also the docs of Hive).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10677 from davies/grouping.
Some analysis rules generate aliases or auxiliary attribute references with the same name but different expression IDs. For example, `ResolveAggregateFunctions` introduces `havingCondition` and `aggOrder`, and `DistinctAggregationRewriter` introduces `gid`.
This is OK for normal query execution since these attribute references get expression IDs. However, it's troublesome when converting resolved query plans back to SQL query strings since expression IDs are erased.
Here's an example Spark 1.6.0 snippet for illustration:
```scala
sqlContext.range(10).select('id as 'a, 'id as 'b).registerTempTable("t")
sqlContext.sql("SELECT SUM(a) FROM t GROUP BY a, b ORDER BY COUNT(a), COUNT(b)").explain(true)
```
The above code produces the following resolved plan:
```
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
_c0: bigint
Project [_c0#101L]
+- Sort [aggOrder#102L ASC,aggOrder#103L ASC], true
+- Aggregate [a#47L,b#48L], [(sum(a#47L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS _c0#101L,(count(a#47L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS aggOrder#102L,(count(b#48L),mode=Complete,isDistinct=false) AS aggOrder#103L]
+- Subquery t
+- Project [id#46L AS a#47L,id#46L AS b#48L]
+- LogicalRDD [id#46L], MapPartitionsRDD[44] at range at <console>:26
```
Here we can see that both aggregate expressions in `ORDER BY` are extracted into an `Aggregate` operator, and both of them are named `aggOrder` with different expression IDs.
The solution is to automatically add the expression IDs into the attribute name for the Alias and AttributeReferences that are generated by Analyzer in SQL Generation.
In this PR, it also resolves another issue. Users could use the same name as the internally generated names. The duplicate names should not cause name ambiguity. When resolving the column, Catalyst should not pick the column that is internally generated.
Could you review the solution? marmbrus liancheng
I did not set the newly added flag for all the alias and attribute reference generated by Analyzers. Please let me know if I should do it? Thank you!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#11050 from gatorsmile/namingConflicts.
This PR improve the lookup of BytesToBytesMap by:
1. Generate code for calculate the hash code of grouping keys.
2. Do not use MemoryLocation, fetch the baseObject and offset for key and value directly (remove the indirection).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11010 from davies/gen_map.
nullability should only be considered as an optimization rather than part of the type system, so instead of failing analysis for mismatch nullability, we should pass analysis and add runtime null check.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11035 from cloud-fan/ignore-nullability.
This patch changes the implementation of the physical `Limit` operator so that it relies on the `Exchange` operator to perform data movement rather than directly using `ShuffledRDD`. In addition to improving efficiency, this lays the necessary groundwork for further optimization of limit, such as limit pushdown or whole-stage codegen.
At a high-level, this replaces the old physical `Limit` operator with two new operators, `LocalLimit` and `GlobalLimit`. `LocalLimit` performs per-partition limits, while `GlobalLimit` applies the final limit to a single partition; `GlobalLimit`'s declares that its `requiredInputDistribution` is `SinglePartition`, which will cause the planner to use an `Exchange` to perform the appropriate shuffles. Thus, a logical `Limit` appearing in the middle of a query plan will be expanded into `LocalLimit -> Exchange to one partition -> GlobalLimit`.
In the old code, calling `someDataFrame.limit(100).collect()` or `someDataFrame.take(100)` would actually skip the shuffle and use a fast-path which used `executeTake()` in order to avoid computing all partitions in case only a small number of rows were requested. This patch preserves this optimization by treating logical `Limit` operators specially when they appear as the terminal operator in a query plan: if a `Limit` is the final operator, then we will plan a special `CollectLimit` physical operator which implements the old `take()`-based logic.
In order to be able to match on operators only at the root of the query plan, this patch introduces a special `ReturnAnswer` logical operator which functions similar to `BroadcastHint`: this dummy operator is inserted at the root of the optimized logical plan before invoking the physical planner, allowing the planner to pattern-match on it.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#7334 from JoshRosen/remove-copy-in-limit.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12939
Now we will catch `ObjectOperator` in `Analyzer` and resolve the `fromRowExpression/deserializer` inside it. Also update the `MapGroups` and `CoGroup` to pass in `dataAttributes`, so that we can correctly resolve value deserializer(the `child.output` contains both groupking key and values, which may mess things up if they have same-name attribtues). End-to-end tests are added.
follow-ups:
* remove encoders from typed aggregate expression.
* completely remove resolve/bind in `ExpressionEncoder`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10852 from cloud-fan/bug.
This patch incorporates review feedback from #11069, which is already merged.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11080 from andrewor14/catalog-follow-ups.
Spark SQL should collapse adjacent `Repartition` operators and only keep the last one.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#11064 from JoshRosen/collapse-repartition.
This is a small addendum to #10762 to make the code more robust again future changes.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11070 from rxin/SPARK-12828-natural-join.
This is a step towards consolidating `SQLContext` and `HiveContext`.
This patch extends the existing Catalog API added in #10982 to include methods for handling table partitions. In particular, a partition is identified by `PartitionSpec`, which is just a `Map[String, String]`. The Catalog is still not used by anything yet, but its API is now more or less complete and an implementation is fully tested.
About 200 lines are test code.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#11069 from andrewor14/catalog.
The ```SparkSqlLexer``` currently swallows characters which have not been defined in the grammar. This causes problems with SQL commands, such as: ```add jar file:///tmp/ab/TestUDTF.jar```. In this example the `````` is swallowed.
This PR adds an extra Lexer rule to handle such input, and makes a tiny modification to the ```ASTNode```.
cc davies liancheng
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11052 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13157.
Based on the semantics of a query, we can derive a number of data constraints on output of each (logical or physical) operator. For instance, if a filter defines `‘a > 10`, we know that the output data of this filter satisfies 2 constraints:
1. `‘a > 10`
2. `isNotNull(‘a)`
This PR proposes a possible way of keeping track of these constraints and propagating them in the logical plan, which can then help us build more advanced optimizations (such as pruning redundant filters, optimizing joins, among others). We define constraints as a set of (implicitly conjunctive) expressions. For e.g., if a filter operator has constraints = `Set(‘a > 10, ‘b < 100)`, it’s implied that the outputs satisfy both individual constraints (i.e., `‘a > 10` AND `‘b < 100`).
Design Document: https://docs.google.com/a/databricks.com/document/d/1WQRgDurUBV9Y6CWOBS75PQIqJwT-6WftVa18xzm7nCo/edit?usp=sharing
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#10844 from sameeragarwal/constraints.
1. try to avoid the suffix (unique id)
2. remove the comment if there is no code generated.
3. re-arrange the order of functions
4. trop the new line for inlined blocks.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#11032 from davies/better_suffix.
The example will throw error like
<console>:20: error: not found: value StructType
Need to add this line:
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Author: Kevin (Sangwoo) Kim <sangwookim.me@gmail.com>
Closes#10141 from swkimme/patch-1.
As benchmarked and discussed here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10786/files#r50038294, benefits from codegen, the declarative aggregate function could be much faster than imperative one.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10960 from davies/stddev.
Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13056
Create a map like
{ "a": "somestring", "b": null}
Query like
SELECT col["b"] FROM t1;
NPE would be thrown.
Author: Daoyuan Wang <daoyuan.wang@intel.com>
Closes#10964 from adrian-wang/npewriter.
This pull request creates an internal catalog API. The creation of this API is the first step towards consolidating SQLContext and HiveContext. I envision we will have two different implementations in Spark 2.0: (1) a simple in-memory implementation, and (2) an implementation based on the current HiveClient (ClientWrapper).
I took a look at what Hive's internal metastore interface/implementation, and then created this API based on it. I believe this is the minimal set needed in order to achieve all the needed functionality.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10982 from rxin/SPARK-13078.
This includes: float, boolean, short, decimal and calendar interval.
Decimal is mapped to long or byte array depending on the size and calendar
interval is mapped to a struct of int and long.
The only remaining type is map. The schema mapping is straightforward but
we might want to revisit how we deal with this in the rest of the execution
engine.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#10961 from nongli/spark-13043.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12705
**Scope:**
This PR is a general fix for sorting reference resolution when the child's `outputSet` does not have the order-by attributes (called, *missing attributes*):
- UnaryNode support is limited to `Project`, `Window`, `Aggregate`, `Distinct`, `Filter`, `RepartitionByExpression`.
- We will not try to resolve the missing references inside a subquery, unless the outputSet of this subquery contains it.
**General Reference Resolution Rules:**
- Jump over the nodes with the following types: `Distinct`, `Filter`, `RepartitionByExpression`. Do not need to add missing attributes. The reason is their `outputSet` is decided by their `inputSet`, which is the `outputSet` of their children.
- Group-by expressions in `Aggregate`: missing order-by attributes are not allowed to be added into group-by expressions since it will change the query result. Thus, in RDBMS, it is not allowed.
- Aggregate expressions in `Aggregate`: if the group-by expressions in `Aggregate` contains the missing attributes but aggregate expressions do not have it, just add them into the aggregate expressions. This can resolve the analysisExceptions thrown by the three TCPDS queries.
- `Project` and `Window` are special. We just need to add the missing attributes to their `projectList`.
**Implementation:**
1. Traverse the whole tree in a pre-order manner to find all the resolvable missing order-by attributes.
2. Traverse the whole tree in a post-order manner to add the found missing order-by attributes to the node if their `inputSet` contains the attributes.
3. If the origins of the missing order-by attributes are different nodes, each pass only resolves the missing attributes that are from the same node.
**Risk:**
Low. This rule will be trigger iff ```!s.resolved && child.resolved``` is true. Thus, very few cases are affected.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10678 from gatorsmile/sortWindows.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12989
In the rule `ExtractWindowExpressions`, we simply replace alias by the corresponding attribute. However, this will cause an issue exposed by the following case:
```scala
val data = Seq(("a", "b", "c", 3), ("c", "b", "a", 3)).toDF("A", "B", "C", "num")
.withColumn("Data", struct("A", "B", "C"))
.drop("A")
.drop("B")
.drop("C")
val winSpec = Window.partitionBy("Data.A", "Data.B").orderBy($"num".desc)
data.select($"*", max("num").over(winSpec) as "max").explain(true)
```
In this case, both `Data.A` and `Data.B` are `alias` in `WindowSpecDefinition`. If we replace these alias expression by their alias names, we are unable to know what they are since they will not be put in `missingExpr` too.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10963 from gatorsmile/seletStarAfterColDrop.
The current implementation is sub-optimal:
* If an expression is always nullable, e.g. `Unhex`, we can still remove null check for children if they are not nullable.
* If an expression has some non-nullable children, we can still remove null check for these children and keep null check for others.
This PR improves this by making the null check elimination more fine-grained.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10987 from cloud-fan/null-check.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12689
DDLParser processes three commands: createTable, describeTable and refreshTable.
This patch migrates the three commands to newly absorbed parser.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Closes#10723 from viirya/migrate-ddl-describe.
Make sure we throw better error messages when Parquet schema merging fails.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#10979 from viirya/schema-merging-failure-message.
In jdk1.7 TimeZone.getTimeZone() is synchronized, so use an instance variable to hold an GMT TimeZone object instead of instantiate it every time.
Author: wangyang <wangyang@haizhi.com>
Closes#10994 from wangyang1992/datetimeUtil.
This class is only used for serialization of Python DataFrame. However, we don't require internal row there, so `GenericRowWithSchema` can also do the job.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10992 from cloud-fan/python.
This PR add support for grouping keys for generated TungstenAggregate.
Spilling and performance improvements for BytesToBytesMap will be done by followup PR.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10855 from davies/gen_keys.
Our current Intersect physical operator simply delegates to RDD.intersect. We should remove the Intersect physical operator and simply transform a logical intersect into a semi-join with distinct. This way, we can take advantage of all the benefits of join implementations (e.g. managed memory, code generation, broadcast joins).
After a search, I found one of the mainstream RDBMS did the same. In their query explain, Intersect is replaced by Left-semi Join. Left-semi Join could help outer-join elimination in Optimizer, as shown in the PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10566
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10630 from gatorsmile/IntersectBySemiJoin.
1. enable whole stage codegen during tests even there is only one operator supports that.
2. split doProduce() into two APIs: upstream() and doProduce()
3. generate prefix for fresh names of each operator
4. pass UnsafeRow to parent directly (avoid getters and create UnsafeRow again)
5. fix bugs and tests.
This PR re-open #10944 and fix the bug.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10977 from davies/gen_refactor.
A simple workaround to avoid getting parameter types when convert a
logical plan to json.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10970 from cloud-fan/reflection.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12968
Implement command to set current database.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Closes#10916 from viirya/ddl-use-database.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11955
Currently we simply skip pushdowning filters in parquet if we enable schema merging.
However, we can actually mark particular fields in merging schema for safely pushdowning filters in parquet.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#9940 from viirya/safe-pushdown-parquet-filters.
1. enable whole stage codegen during tests even there is only one operator supports that.
2. split doProduce() into two APIs: upstream() and doProduce()
3. generate prefix for fresh names of each operator
4. pass UnsafeRow to parent directly (avoid getters and create UnsafeRow again)
5. fix bugs and tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10944 from davies/gen_refactor.
This PR moves all the functionality provided by the SparkSQLParser/ExtendedHiveQlParser to the new Parser hierarchy (SparkQl/HiveQl). This also improves the current SET command parsing: the current implementation swallows ```set role ...``` and ```set autocommit ...``` commands, this PR respects these commands (and passes them on to Hive).
This PR and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723 end the use of Parser-Combinator parsers for SQL parsing. As a result we can also remove the ```AbstractSQLParser``` in Catalyst.
The PR is marked WIP as long as it doesn't pass all tests.
cc rxin viirya winningsix (this touches https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10144)
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10905 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12866.
The error message is now changed from "Do not support type class scala.Tuple2." to "Do not support type class org.json4s.JsonAST$JNull$" to be more informative about what is not supported. Also, StructType metadata now handles JNull correctly, i.e., {'a': None}. test_metadata_null is added to tests.py to show the fix works.
Author: Jason Lee <cjlee@us.ibm.com>
Closes#8969 from jasoncl/SPARK-10847.
This patch adds support for complex types for ColumnarBatch. ColumnarBatch supports structs
and arrays. There is a simple mapping between the richer catalyst types to these two. Strings
are treated as an array of bytes.
ColumnarBatch will contain a column for each node of the schema. Non-complex schemas consists
of just leaf nodes. Structs represent an internal node with one child for each field. Arrays
are internal nodes with one child. Structs just contain nullability. Arrays contain offsets
and lengths into the child array. This structure is able to handle arbitrary nesting. It has
the key property that we maintain columnar throughout and that primitive types are only stored
in the leaf nodes and contiguous across rows. For example, if the schema is
```
array<array<int>>
```
There are three columns in the schema. The internal nodes each have one children. The leaf node contains all the int data stored consecutively.
As part of this, this patch adds append APIs in addition to the Put APIs (e.g. putLong(rowid, v)
vs appendLong(v)). These APIs are necessary when the batch contains variable length elements.
The vectors are not fixed length and will grow as necessary. This should make the usage a lot
simpler for the writer.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#10820 from nongli/spark-12854.
Otherwise the `^` character is always marked as error in IntelliJ since it represents an unclosed superscript markup tag.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10926 from liancheng/agg-doc-fix.
As we begin to use unsafe row writing framework(`BufferHolder` and `UnsafeRowWriter`) in more and more places(`UnsafeProjection`, `UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader`, `GenerateColumnAccessor`, etc.), we should add more doc to it and make it easier to use.
This PR abstract the technique used in `UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader`: avoid unnecessary operatition as more as possible. For example, do not always point the row to the buffer at the end, we only need to update the size of row. If all fields are of primitive type, we can even save the row size updating. Then we can apply this technique to more places easily.
a local benchmark shows `UnsafeProjection` is up to 1.7x faster after this PR:
**old version**
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
unsafe projection: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
single long 2616.04 102.61 1.00 X
single nullable long 3032.54 88.52 0.86 X
primitive types 9121.05 29.43 0.29 X
nullable primitive types 12410.60 21.63 0.21 X
```
**new version**
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
unsafe projection: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
single long 1533.34 175.07 1.00 X
single nullable long 2306.73 116.37 0.66 X
primitive types 8403.93 31.94 0.18 X
nullable primitive types 12448.39 21.56 0.12 X
```
For single non-nullable long(the best case), we can have about 1.7x speed up. Even it's nullable, we can still have 1.3x speed up. For other cases, it's not such a boost as the saved operations only take a little proportion of the whole process. The benchmark code is included in this PR.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10809 from cloud-fan/unsafe-projection.
This pull request implements strength reduction for comparing integral expressions and decimal literals, which is more common now because we switch to parsing fractional literals as decimal types (rather than doubles). I added the rules to the existing DecimalPrecision rule with some refactoring to simplify the control flow. I also moved DecimalPrecision rule into its own file due to the growing size.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10882 from rxin/SPARK-12904-1.
The current parser turns a decimal literal, for example ```12.1```, into a Double. The problem with this approach is that we convert an exact literal into a non-exact ```Double```. The PR changes this behavior, a Decimal literal is now converted into an extact ```BigDecimal```.
The behavior for scientific decimals, for example ```12.1e01```, is unchanged. This will be converted into a Double.
This PR replaces the ```BigDecimal``` literal by a ```Double``` literal, because the ```BigDecimal``` is the default now. You can use the double literal by appending a 'D' to the value, for instance: ```3.141527D```
cc davies rxin
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10796 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12848.
The existing `Union` logical operator only supports two children. Thus, adding a new logical operator `Unions` which can have arbitrary number of children to replace the existing one.
`Union` logical plan is a binary node. However, a typical use case for union is to union a very large number of input sources (DataFrames, RDDs, or files). It is not uncommon to union hundreds of thousands of files. In this case, our optimizer can become very slow due to the large number of logical unions. We should change the Union logical plan to support an arbitrary number of children, and add a single rule in the optimizer to collapse all adjacent `Unions` into a single `Unions`. Note that this problem doesn't exist in physical plan, because the physical `Unions` already supports arbitrary number of children.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10577 from gatorsmile/unionAllMultiChildren.
Also updated documentation to explain why ComputeCurrentTime and EliminateSubQueries are in the optimizer rather than analyzer.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10837 from rxin/optimizer-analyzer-comment.
The three optimization cases are:
1. If the first branch's condition is a true literal, remove the CaseWhen and use the value from that branch.
2. If a branch's condition is a false or null literal, remove that branch.
3. If only the else branch is left, remove the CaseWhen and use the value from the else branch.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10827 from rxin/SPARK-12770.
Call `dealias` on local types to fix schema generation for abstract type members, such as
```scala
type KeyValue = (Int, String)
```
Add simple test
Author: Jakob Odersky <jodersky@gmail.com>
Closes#10749 from jodersky/aliased-schema.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12867
When intersecting one nullable column with one non-nullable column, the result will not contain any null. Thus, we can make nullability of `intersect` stricter.
liancheng Could you please check if the code changes are appropriate? Also added test cases to verify the results. Thanks!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10812 from gatorsmile/nullabilityIntersect.
Based on discussions in #10801, I'm submitting a pull request to rename ParserDialect to ParserInterface.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10817 from rxin/SPARK-12889.
In SPARK-10743 we wrap cast with `UnresolvedAlias` to give `Cast` a better alias if possible. However, for cases like `filter`, the `UnresolvedAlias` can't be resolved and actually we don't need a better alias for this case. This PR move the cast wrapping logic to `Column.named` so that we will only do it when we need a alias name.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10781 from cloud-fan/bug.
This pull request removes the public developer parser API for external parsers. Given everything a parser depends on (e.g. logical plans and expressions) are internal and not stable, external parsers will break with every release of Spark. It is a bad idea to create the illusion that Spark actually supports pluggable parsers. In addition, this also reduces incentives for 3rd party projects to contribute parse improvements back to Spark.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10801 from rxin/SPARK-12855.
I was reading this part of the analyzer code again and got confused by the difference between findWiderTypeForTwo and findTightestCommonTypeOfTwo.
I also simplified WidenSetOperationTypes to make it a lot simpler. The easiest way to review this one is to just read the original code, and the new code. The logic is super simple.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10802 from rxin/SPARK-12873.
This is the initial work for whole stage codegen, it support Projection/Filter/Range, we will continue work on this to support more physical operators.
A micro benchmark show that a query with range, filter and projection could be 3X faster then before.
It's turned on by default. For a tree that have at least two chained plans, a WholeStageCodegen will be inserted into it, for example, the following plan
```
Limit 10
+- Project [(id#5L + 1) AS (id + 1)#6L]
+- Filter ((id#5L & 1) = 1)
+- Range 0, 1, 4, 10, [id#5L]
```
will be translated into
```
Limit 10
+- WholeStageCodegen
+- Project [(id#1L + 1) AS (id + 1)#2L]
+- Filter ((id#1L & 1) = 1)
+- Range 0, 1, 4, 10, [id#1L]
```
Here is the call graph to generate Java source for A and B (A support codegen, but B does not):
```
* WholeStageCodegen Plan A FakeInput Plan B
* =========================================================================
*
* -> execute()
* |
* doExecute() --------> produce()
* |
* doProduce() -------> produce()
* |
* doProduce() ---> execute()
* |
* consume()
* doConsume() ------------|
* |
* doConsume() <----- consume()
```
A SparkPlan that support codegen need to implement doProduce() and doConsume():
```
def doProduce(ctx: CodegenContext): (RDD[InternalRow], String)
def doConsume(ctx: CodegenContext, child: SparkPlan, input: Seq[ExprCode]): String
```
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10735 from davies/whole2.
We iterate the bytes to calculate hashCode before, but now we have `Murmur3_x86_32.hashUnsafeBytes` that don't require the bytes to be word algned, we should use that instead.
A simple benchmark shows it's about 3 X faster, benchmark code: https://gist.github.com/cloud-fan/fa77713ccebf0823b2ab#file-arrayhashbenchmark-scala
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10784 from cloud-fan/array-hashcode.
In this PR the new CatalystQl parser stack reaches grammar parity with the old Parser-Combinator based SQL Parser. This PR also replaces all uses of the old Parser, and removes it from the code base.
Although the existing Hive and SQL parser dialects were mostly the same, some kinks had to be worked out:
- The SQL Parser allowed syntax like ```APPROXIMATE(0.01) COUNT(DISTINCT a)```. In order to make this work we needed to hardcode approximate operators in the parser, or we would have to create an approximate expression. ```APPROXIMATE_COUNT_DISTINCT(a, 0.01)``` would also do the job and is much easier to maintain. So, this PR **removes** this keyword.
- The old SQL Parser supports ```LIMIT``` clauses in nested queries. This is **not supported** anymore. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689 for the rationale for this.
- Hive has a charset name char set literal combination it supports, for instance the following expression ```_ISO-8859-1 0x4341464562616265``` would yield this string: ```CAFEbabe```. Hive will only allow charset names to start with an underscore. This is quite annoying in spark because as soon as you use a tuple names will start with an underscore. In this PR we **remove** this feature from the parser. It would be quite easy to implement such a feature as an Expression later on.
- Hive and the SQL Parser treat decimal literals differently. Hive will turn any decimal into a ```Double``` whereas the SQL Parser would convert a non-scientific decimal into a ```BigDecimal```, and would turn a scientific decimal into a Double. We follow Hive's behavior here. The new parser supports a big decimal literal, for instance: ```81923801.42BD```, which can be used when a big decimal is needed.
cc rxin viirya marmbrus yhuai cloud-fan
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10745 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12575-2.
We made it a `NamedExpression` to workaroud some hacky cases long time ago, and now seems it's safe to remove it.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10765 from cloud-fan/minor.
The goal of this PR is to eliminate unnecessary translations when there are back-to-back `MapPartitions` operations. In order to achieve this I also made the following simplifications:
- Operators no longer have hold encoders, instead they have only the expressions that they need. The benefits here are twofold: the expressions are visible to transformations so go through the normal resolution/binding process. now that they are visible we can change them on a case by case basis.
- Operators no longer have type parameters. Since the engine is responsible for its own type checking, having the types visible to the complier was an unnecessary complication. We still leverage the scala compiler in the companion factory when constructing a new operator, but after this the types are discarded.
Deferred to a follow up PR:
- Remove as much of the resolution/binding from Dataset/GroupedDataset as possible. We should still eagerly check resolution and throw an error though in the case of mismatches for an `as` operation.
- Eliminate serializations in more cases by adding more cases to `EliminateSerialization`
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#10747 from marmbrus/encoderExpressions.
The generated code for CaseWhen uses a control variable "got" to make sure we do not evaluate more branches once a branch is true. Changing that to generate just simple "if / else" would be slightly more efficient.
This closes#10737.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10755 from rxin/SPARK-12771.
This PR makes bucketing and exchange share one common hash algorithm, so that we can guarantee the data distribution is same between shuffle and bucketed data source, which enables us to only shuffle one side when join a bucketed table and a normal one.
This PR also fixes the tests that are broken by the new hash behaviour in shuffle.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10703 from cloud-fan/use-hash-expr-in-shuffle.
This pull request rewrites CaseWhen expression to break the single, monolithic "branches" field into a sequence of tuples (Seq[(condition, value)]) and an explicit optional elseValue field.
Prior to this pull request, each even position in "branches" represents the condition for each branch, and each odd position represents the value for each branch. The use of them have been pretty confusing with a lot sliding windows or grouped(2) calls.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10734 from rxin/simplify-case.
Fix the style violation (space before , and :).
This PR is a followup for #10643 and rework of #10685 .
Author: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Closes#10732 from sarutak/SPARK-12692-followup-sql.
This patch removes CaseKeyWhen expression and replaces it with a factory method that generates the equivalent CaseWhen. This reduces the amount of code we'd need to maintain in the future for both code generation and optimizer.
Note that we introduced CaseKeyWhen to avoid duplicate evaluations of the key. This is no longer a problem because we now have common subexpression elimination.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10722 from rxin/SPARK-12768.
This pull request does a few small things:
1. Separated if simplification from BooleanSimplification and created a new rule SimplifyConditionals. In the future we can also simplify other conditional expressions here.
2. Added unit test for SimplifyConditionals.
3. Renamed SimplifyCaseConversionExpressionsSuite to SimplifyStringCaseConversionSuite
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10716 from rxin/SPARK-12762.
Fix the style violation (space before , and :).
This PR is a followup for #10643.
Author: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Closes#10718 from sarutak/SPARK-12692-followup-sql.
Scala syntax allows binary case classes to be used as infix operator in pattern matching. This PR makes use of this syntax sugar to make `BooleanSimplification` more readable.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10445 from liancheng/boolean-simplification-simplification.
The PR allows us to use the new SQL parser to parse SQL expressions such as: ```1 + sin(x*x)```
We enable this functionality in this PR, but we will not start using this actively yet. This will be done as soon as we have reached grammar parity with the existing parser stack.
cc rxin
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10649 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12576.
Turn import ordering violations into build errors, plus a few adjustments
to account for how the checker behaves. I'm a little on the fence about
whether the existing code is right, but it's easier to appease the checker
than to discuss what's the more correct order here.
Plus a few fixes to imports that cropped in since my recent cleanups.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#10612 from vanzin/SPARK-3873-enable.
This PR tries to enable Spark SQL to convert resolved logical plans back to SQL query strings. For now, the major use case is to canonicalize Spark SQL native view support. The major entry point is `SQLBuilder.toSQL`, which returns an `Option[String]` if the logical plan is recognized.
The current version is still in WIP status, and is quite limited. Known limitations include:
1. The logical plan must be analyzed but not optimized
The optimizer erases `Subquery` operators, which contain necessary scope information for SQL generation. Future versions should be able to recover erased scope information by inserting subqueries when necessary.
1. The logical plan must be created using HiveQL query string
Query plans generated by composing arbitrary DataFrame API combinations are not supported yet. Operators within these query plans need to be rearranged into a canonical form that is more suitable for direct SQL generation. For example, the following query plan
```
Filter (a#1 < 10)
+- MetastoreRelation default, src, None
```
need to be canonicalized into the following form before SQL generation:
```
Project [a#1, b#2, c#3]
+- Filter (a#1 < 10)
+- MetastoreRelation default, src, None
```
Otherwise, the SQL generation process will have to handle a large number of special cases.
1. Only a fraction of expressions and basic logical plan operators are supported in this PR
Currently, 95.7% (1720 out of 1798) query plans in `HiveCompatibilitySuite` can be successfully converted to SQL query strings.
Known unsupported components are:
- Expressions
- Part of math expressions
- Part of string expressions (buggy?)
- Null expressions
- Calendar interval literal
- Part of date time expressions
- Complex type creators
- Special `NOT` expressions, e.g. `NOT LIKE` and `NOT IN`
- Logical plan operators/patterns
- Cube, rollup, and grouping set
- Script transformation
- Generator
- Distinct aggregation patterns that fit `DistinctAggregationRewriter` analysis rule
- Window functions
Support for window functions, generators, and cubes etc. will be added in follow-up PRs.
This PR leverages `HiveCompatibilitySuite` for testing SQL generation in a "round-trip" manner:
* For all select queries, we try to convert it back to SQL
* If the query plan is convertible, we parse the generated SQL into a new logical plan
* Run the new logical plan instead of the original one
If the query plan is inconvertible, the test case simply falls back to the original logic.
TODO
- [x] Fix failed test cases
- [x] Support for more basic expressions and logical plan operators (e.g. distinct aggregation etc.)
- [x] Comments and documentation
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10541 from liancheng/sql-generation.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12687
Some queries such as `(select 1 as a) union (select 2 as a)` can't work. This patch fixes it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#10660 from viirya/fix-union.
Use multi-line string literals for ExpressionDescription with ``// scalastyle:off line.size.limit`` and ``// scalastyle:on line.size.limit``
The policy is here, as describe at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10488
Let's use multi-line string literals. If we have to have a line with more than 100 characters, let's use ``// scalastyle:off line.size.limit`` and ``// scalastyle:on line.size.limit`` to just bypass the line number requirement.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#10524 from kiszk/SPARK-12580.
To avoid to have a huge Java source (over 64K loc), that can't be compiled.
cc hvanhovell
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10624 from davies/split_ident.
This PR moves a major part of the new SQL parser to Catalyst. This is a prelude to start using this parser for all of our SQL parsing. The following key changes have been made:
The ANTLR Parser & Supporting classes have been moved to the Catalyst project. They are now part of the ```org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser``` package. These classes contained quite a bit of code that was originally from the Hive project, I have added aknowledgements whenever this applied. All Hive dependencies have been factored out. I have also taken this chance to clean-up the ```ASTNode``` class, and to improve the error handling.
The HiveQl object that provides the functionality to convert an AST into a LogicalPlan has been refactored into three different classes, one for every SQL sub-project:
- ```CatalystQl```: This implements Query and Expression parsing functionality.
- ```SparkQl```: This is a subclass of CatalystQL and provides SQL/Core only functionality such as Explain and Describe.
- ```HiveQl```: This is a subclass of ```SparkQl``` and this adds Hive-only functionality to the parser such as Analyze, Drop, Views, CTAS & Transforms. This class still depends on Hive.
cc rxin
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10583 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12575.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12439
In toCatalystArray, we should look at the data type returned by dataTypeFor instead of silentSchemaFor, to determine if the element is native type. An obvious problem is when the element is Option[Int] class, catalsilentSchemaFor will return Int, then we will wrongly recognize the element is native type.
There is another problem when using Option as array element. When we encode data like Seq(Some(1), Some(2), None) with encoder, we will use MapObjects to construct an array for it later. But in MapObjects, we don't check if the return value of lambdaFunction is null or not. That causes a bug that the decoded data for Seq(Some(1), Some(2), None) would be Seq(1, 2, -1), instead of Seq(1, 2, null).
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#10391 from viirya/fix-catalystarray.
address comments in #10435
This makes the API easier to use if user programmatically generate the call to hash, and they will get analysis exception if the arguments of hash is empty.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10588 from cloud-fan/hash.
just write the arguments into unsafe row and use murmur3 to calculate hash code
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10435 from cloud-fan/hash-expr.
The reader was previously not setting the row length meaning it was wrong if there were variable
length columns. This problem does not manifest usually, since the value in the column is correct and
projecting the row fixes the issue.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#10576 from nongli/spark-12589.
This PR enable cube/rollup as function, so they can be used as this:
```
select a, b, sum(c) from t group by rollup(a, b)
```
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10522 from davies/rollup.
It is currently possible to change the values of the supposedly immutable ```GenericRow``` and ```GenericInternalRow``` classes. This is caused by the fact that scala's ArrayOps ```toArray``` (returned by calling ```toSeq```) will return the backing array instead of a copy. This PR fixes this problem.
This PR was inspired by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374 by apo1.
cc apo1 sarutak marmbrus cloud-fan nongli (everyone in the previous conversation).
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10553 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12421.
Avoiding the the No such table exception and throwing analysis exception as per the bug: SPARK-12533
Author: thomastechs <thomas.sebastian@tcs.com>
Closes#10529 from thomastechs/topic-branch.
Right now, numFields will be passed in by pointTo(), then bitSetWidthInBytes is calculated, making pointTo() a little bit heavy.
It should be part of constructor of UnsafeRow.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10528 from davies/numFields.
Most of cases we should propagate null when call `NewInstance`, and so far there is only one case we should stop null propagation: create product/java bean. So I think it makes more sense to propagate null by dafault.
This also fixes a bug when encode null array/map, which is firstly discovered in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10401
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10443 from cloud-fan/encoder.
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'value' given input columns text;
```
lets put a `:` after `columns` and put the columns in `[]` so that they match the toString of DataFrame.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10518 from gatorsmile/improveAnalysisExceptionMsg.
In Spark we allow UDFs to declare its expected input types in order to apply type coercion. The expected input type parameter takes a Seq[DataType] and uses Nil when no type coercion is applied. It makes more sense to take Option[Seq[DataType]] instead, so we can differentiate a no-arg function vs function with no expected input type specified.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10504 from rxin/SPARK-12549.
When explain any plan with Generate, we will see an exclamation mark in the plan. Normally, when we see this mark, it means the plan has an error. This PR is to correct the `missingInput` in `Generate`.
For example,
```scala
val df = Seq((1, "a b c"), (2, "a b"), (3, "a")).toDF("number", "letters")
val df2 =
df.explode('letters) {
case Row(letters: String) => letters.split(" ").map(Tuple1(_)).toSeq
}
df2.explain(true)
```
Before the fix, the plan is like
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Generate UserDefinedGenerator('letters), true, false, None
+- Project [_1#0 AS number#2,_2#1 AS letters#3]
+- LocalRelation [_1#0,_2#1], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
number: int, letters: string, _1: string
Generate UserDefinedGenerator(letters#3), true, false, None, [_1#8]
+- Project [_1#0 AS number#2,_2#1 AS letters#3]
+- LocalRelation [_1#0,_2#1], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Generate UserDefinedGenerator(letters#3), true, false, None, [_1#8]
+- LocalRelation [number#2,letters#3], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
== Physical Plan ==
!Generate UserDefinedGenerator(letters#3), true, false, [number#2,letters#3,_1#8]
+- LocalTableScan [number#2,letters#3], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
```
**Updates**: The same issues are also found in the other four Dataset operators: `MapPartitions`/`AppendColumns`/`MapGroups`/`CoGroup`. Fixed all these four.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10393 from gatorsmile/generateExplain.
Moved (case) classes Strategy, Once, FixedPoint and Batch to the companion object. This is necessary if we want to have the Optimizer easily extendable in the following sense: Usually a user wants to add additional rules, and just take the ones that are already there. However, inner classes made that impossible since the code did not compile
This allows easy extension of existing Optimizers see the DefaultOptimizerExtendableSuite for a corresponding test case.
Author: Stephan Kessler <stephan.kessler@sap.com>
Closes#10174 from stephankessler/SPARK-7727.
Accessing null elements in an array field fails when tungsten is enabled.
It works in Spark 1.3.1, and in Spark > 1.5 with Tungsten disabled.
This PR solves this by checking if the accessed element in the array field is null, in the generated code.
Example:
```
// Array of String
case class AS( as: Seq[String] )
val dfAS = sc.parallelize( Seq( AS ( Seq("a",null,"b") ) ) ).toDF
dfAS.registerTempTable("T_AS")
for (i <- 0 to 2) { println(i + " = " + sqlContext.sql(s"select as[$i] from T_AS").collect.mkString(","))}
```
With Tungsten disabled:
```
0 = [a]
1 = [null]
2 = [b]
```
With Tungsten enabled:
```
0 = [a]
15/12/22 09:32:50 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 7.0 in stage 1.0 (TID 15)
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRowWriters$UTF8StringWriter.getSize(UnsafeRowWriters.java:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificUnsafeProjection.apply(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.TungstenProject$$anonfun$3$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(basicOperators.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.TungstenProject$$anonfun$3$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(basicOperators.scala:88)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:727)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1157)
```
Author: pierre-borckmans <pierre.borckmans@realimpactanalytics.com>
Closes#10429 from pierre-borckmans/SPARK-12477_Tungsten-Projection-Null-Element-In-Array.
When creating extractors for product types (i.e. case classes and tuples), a null check is missing, thus we always assume input product values are non-null.
This PR adds a null check in the extractor expression for product types. The null check is stripped off for top level product fields, which are mapped to the outermost `Row`s, since they can't be null.
Thanks cloud-fan for helping investigating this issue!
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10431 from liancheng/spark-12478.top-level-null-field.
Compare both left and right side of the case expression ignoring nullablity when checking for type equality.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10156 from dilipbiswal/spark-12102.
First try, not sure how much information we need to provide in the usage part.
Author: Xiu Guo <xguo27@gmail.com>
Closes#10423 from xguo27/SPARK-12456.
This PR adds a new expression `AssertNotNull` to ensure non-nullable fields of products and case classes don't receive null values at runtime.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10331 from liancheng/dataset-nullability-check.
Based on the suggestions from marmbrus , added logical/physical operators for Range for improving the performance.
Also added another API for resolving the JIRA Spark-12150.
Could you take a look at my implementation, marmbrus ? If not good, I can rework it. : )
Thank you very much!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10335 from gatorsmile/rangeOperators.
When a DataFrame or Dataset has a long schema, we should intelligently truncate to avoid flooding the screen with unreadable information.
// Standard output
[a: int, b: int]
// Truncate many top level fields
[a: int, b, string ... 10 more fields]
// Truncate long inner structs
[a: struct<a: Int ... 10 more fields>]
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10373 from dilipbiswal/spark-12398.
Now `StaticInvoke` receives `Any` as a object and `StaticInvoke` can be serialized but sometimes the object passed is not serializable.
For example, following code raises Exception because `RowEncoder#extractorsFor` invoked indirectly makes `StaticInvoke`.
```
case class TimestampContainer(timestamp: java.sql.Timestamp)
val rdd = sc.parallelize(1 to 2).map(_ => TimestampContainer(System.currentTimeMillis))
val df = rdd.toDF
val ds = df.as[TimestampContainer]
val rdd2 = ds.rdd <----------------- invokes extractorsFor indirectory
```
I'll add test cases.
Author: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#10357 from sarutak/SPARK-12404.
This could simplify the generated code for expressions that is not nullable.
This PR fix lots of bugs about nullability.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10333 from davies/skip_nullable.
Description of the problem from cloud-fan
Actually this line: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-1.5/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala#L689
When we use `selectExpr`, we pass in `UnresolvedFunction` to `DataFrame.select` and fall in the last case. A workaround is to do special handling for UDTF like we did for `explode`(and `json_tuple` in 1.6), wrap it with `MultiAlias`.
Another workaround is using `expr`, for example, `df.select(expr("explode(a)").as(Nil))`, I think `selectExpr` is no longer needed after we have the `expr` function....
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#9981 from dilipbiswal/spark-11619.
This PR removes Hive windows functions from Spark and replaces them with (native) Spark ones. The PR is on par with Hive in terms of features.
This has the following advantages:
* Better memory management.
* The ability to use spark UDAFs in Window functions.
cc rxin / yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#9819 from hvanhovell/SPARK-8641-2.
I think it was a mistake, and we have not catched it so far until https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10260 which begin to check if the `fromRowExpression` is resolved.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10263 from cloud-fan/encoder.
Currently, we could generate different plans for query with single distinct (depends on spark.sql.specializeSingleDistinctAggPlanning), one works better on low cardinality columns, the other
works better for high cardinality column (default one).
This PR change to generate a single plan (three aggregations and two exchanges), which work better in both cases, then we could safely remove the flag `spark.sql.specializeSingleDistinctAggPlanning` (introduced in 1.6).
For a query like `SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT a) FROM table` will be
```
AGG-4 (count distinct)
Shuffle to a single reducer
Partial-AGG-3 (count distinct, no grouping)
Partial-AGG-2 (grouping on a)
Shuffle by a
Partial-AGG-1 (grouping on a)
```
This PR also includes large refactor for aggregation (reduce 500+ lines of code)
cc yhuai nongli marmbrus
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10228 from davies/single_distinct.
