## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
DataFrameRangeSuite.test("Cancelling stage in a query with Range.") stays sometimes in an infinite loop and times out the build.
There were multiple issues with the test:
1. The first valid stageId is zero when the test started alone and not in a suite and the following code waits until timeout:
```
eventually(timeout(10.seconds), interval(1.millis)) {
assert(DataFrameRangeSuite.stageToKill > 0)
}
```
2. The `DataFrameRangeSuite.stageToKill` was overwritten by the task's thread after the reset which ended up in canceling the same stage 2 times. This caused the infinite wait.
This PR solves this mentioned flakyness by removing the shared `DataFrameRangeSuite.stageToKill` and using `onTaskStart` where stage ID is provided. In order to make sure cancelStage called for all stages `waitUntilEmpty` is called on `ListenerBus`.
In [PR20888](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20888) this tried to get solved by:
* Stopping the executor thread with `wait`
* Wait for all `cancelStage` called
* Kill the executor thread by setting `SparkContext.SPARK_JOB_INTERRUPT_ON_CANCEL`
but the thread killing left the shared `SparkContext` sometimes in a state where further jobs can't be submitted. As a result DataFrameRangeSuite.test("Cancelling stage in a query with Range.") test passed properly but the next test inside the suite was hanging.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit test executed 10k times.
Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Closes#21214 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-23775_1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_sort`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
The function sorts the input array in ascending order. The elements of the input array must be orderable. Null elements will be placed at the end of the returned array.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21021 from kiszk/SPARK-23921.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This refactors the external catalog to be an interface. It can be easier for the future work in the catalog federation. After the refactoring, `ExternalCatalog` is much cleaner without mixing the listener event generation logic.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21122 from gatorsmile/refactorExternalCatalog.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables the MicroBatchExecution to run no-data batches if some SparkPlan requires running another batch to output results based on updated watermark / processing time. In this PR, I have enabled streaming aggregations and streaming deduplicates to automatically run addition batch even if new data is available. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24156 for more context.
Major changes/refactoring done in this PR.
- Refactoring MicroBatchExecution - A major point of confusion in MicroBatchExecution control flow was always (at least to me) was that `populateStartOffsets` internally called `constructNextBatch` which was not obvious from just the name "populateStartOffsets" and made the control flow from the main trigger execution loop very confusing (main loop in `runActivatedStream` called `constructNextBatch` but only if `populateStartOffsets` hadn't already called it). Instead, the refactoring makes it cleaner.
- `populateStartOffsets` only the updates `availableOffsets` and `committedOffsets`. Does not call `constructNextBatch`.
- Main loop in `runActivatedStream` calls `constructNextBatch` which returns true or false reflecting whether the next batch is ready for executing. This method is now idempotent; if a batch has already been constructed, then it will always return true until the batch has been executed.
- If next batch is ready then we call `runBatch` or sleep.
- That's it.
- Refactoring watermark management logic - This has been refactored out from `MicroBatchExecution` in a separate class to simplify `MicroBatchExecution`.
- New method `shouldRunAnotherBatch` in `IncrementalExecution` - This returns true if there is any stateful operation in the last execution plan that requires another batch for state cleanup, etc. This is used to decide whether to construct a batch or not in `constructNextBatch`.
- Changes to stream testing framework - Many tests used CheckLastBatch to validate answers. This assumed that there will be no more batches after the last set of input has been processed, so the last batch is the one that has output corresponding to the last input. This is not true anymore. To account for that, I made two changes.
- `CheckNewAnswer` is a new test action that verifies the new rows generated since the last time the answer was checked by `CheckAnswer`, `CheckNewAnswer` or `CheckLastBatch`. This is agnostic to how many batches occurred between the last check and now. To do make this easier, I added a common trait between MemorySink and MemorySinkV2 to abstract out some common methods.
- `assertNumStateRows` has been updated in the same way to be agnostic to batches while checking what the total rows and how many state rows were updated (sums up updates since the last check).
## How was this patch tested?
- Changes made to existing tests - Tests have been changed in one of the following patterns.
- Tests where the last input was given again to force another batch to be executed and state cleaned up / output generated, they were simplified by removing the extra input.
- Tests using aggregation+watermark where CheckLastBatch were replaced with CheckNewAnswer to make them batch agnostic.
- New tests added to check whether the flag works for streaming aggregation and deduplication
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21220 from tdas/SPARK-24157.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Do continuous processing writes with multiple compute() calls.
The current strategy (before this PR) is hacky; we just call next() on an iterator which has already returned hasNext = false, knowing that all the nodes we whitelist handle this properly. This will have to be changed before we can support more complex query plans. (In particular, I have a WIP https://github.com/jose-torres/spark/pull/13 which should be able to support aggregates in a single partition with minimal additional work.)
Most of the changes here are just refactoring to accommodate the new model. The behavioral changes are:
* The writer now calls prev.compute(split, context) once per epoch within the epoch loop.
* ContinuousDataSourceRDD now spawns a ContinuousQueuedDataReader which is shared across multiple calls to compute() for the same partition.
## How was this patch tested?
existing unit tests
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#21200 from jose-torres/noAggr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid unnecessary sleep (10 ms) in each invocation of MemoryStreamDataReader.next.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran ContinuousSuite from IDE.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Arun Mahadevan <arunm@apache.org>
Closes#21207 from arunmahadevan/memorystream.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is extracted from #21190 , to make it easier to backport.
`ParquetFilters` is used in the file scan function, which is executed in executor side, so we can't call `conf.parquetFilterPushDownDate` there.
## How was this patch tested?
it's tested in #21190
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21224 from cloud-fan/minor2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is extracted from #21190 , to make it easier to backport.
`WindowExec#createBoundOrdering` is called on executor side, so we can't use `conf.sessionLocalTimezone` there.
## How was this patch tested?
tested in #21190
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21225 from cloud-fan/minor3.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add SQL support for Pivot according to Pivot grammar defined by Oracle (https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/img_text/pivot_clause.htm) with some simplifications, based on our existing functionality and limitations for Pivot at the backend:
1. For pivot_for_clause (https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/img_text/pivot_for_clause.htm), the column list form is not supported, which means the pivot column can only be one single column.
2. For pivot_in_clause (https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/img_text/pivot_in_clause.htm), the sub-query form and "ANY" is not supported (this is only supported by Oracle for XML anyway).
3. For pivot_in_clause, aliases for the constant values are not supported.
The code changes are:
1. Add parser support for Pivot. Note that according to https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/statements_10002.htm#i2076542, Pivot cannot be used together with lateral views in the from clause. This restriction has been implemented in the Parser rule.
2. Infer group-by expressions: group-by expressions are not explicitly specified in SQL Pivot clause and need to be deduced based on this rule: https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/statements_10002.htm#CHDFAFIE, so we have to post-fix it at query analysis stage.
3. Override Pivot.resolved as "false": for the reason mentioned in [2] and the fact that output attributes change after Pivot being replaced by Project or Aggregate, we avoid resolving parent references until after Pivot has been resolved and replaced.
4. Verify aggregate expressions: only aggregate expressions with or without aliases can appear in the first part of the Pivot clause, and this check is performed as analysis stage.
## How was this patch tested?
A new test suite PivotSuite is added.
Author: maryannxue <maryann.xue@gmail.com>
Closes#21187 from maryannxue/spark-24035.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is extracted from #21190 , to make it easier to backport.
`JsonToStructs` can be serialized to executors and evaluate, we should not call `SQLConf.get.getConf(SQLConf.FROM_JSON_FORCE_NULLABLE_SCHEMA)` in the body.
## How was this patch tested?
tested in #21190
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21226 from cloud-fan/minor4.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is extracted from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21190 , to make it easier to backport.
`InMemoryTableScanExec#createAndDecompressColumn` is executed inside `rdd.map`, we can't access `conf.offHeapColumnVectorEnabled` there.
## How was this patch tested?
it's tested in #21190
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21223 from cloud-fan/minor1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`from_utc_timestamp` assumes its input is in UTC timezone and shifts it to the specified timezone. When the timestamp contains timezone(e.g. `2018-03-13T06:18:23+00:00`), Spark breaks the semantic and respect the timezone in the string. This is not what user expects and the result is different from Hive/Impala. `to_utc_timestamp` has the same problem.
More details please refer to the JIRA ticket.
This PR fixes this by returning null if the input timestamp contains timezone.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21169 from cloud-fan/from_utc_timezone.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added the TPCDS v2.7 (latest) queries in `TPCDSQueryBenchmark`.
These query files have been added in `SPARK-23167`.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually checked.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21177 from maropu/AddTpcdsV2_7InBenchmark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `cardinality`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
The function returns the length of the array or map stored in the column as `int` while the Presto version returns the value as `BigInt` (`long` in Spark). The discussions regarding the difference of return type are [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21031#issuecomment-381284638) and [there](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21031#discussion_r181622107).
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21031 from kiszk/SPARK-23923.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ColumnVector`s store string data in one big byte array. Since the array size is capped at just under Integer.MAX_VALUE, a single `ColumnVector` cannot store more than 2GB of string data.
But since the Parquet files commonly contain large blobs stored as strings, and `ColumnVector`s by default carry 4096 values, it's entirely possible to go past that limit. In such cases a negative capacity is requested from `WritableColumnVector.reserve()`. The call succeeds (requested capacity is smaller than already allocated capacity), and consequently `java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException` is thrown when the reader actually attempts to put the data into the array.
This change introduces a simple check for integer overflow to `WritableColumnVector.reserve()` which should help catch the error earlier and provide more informative exception. Additionally, the error message in `WritableColumnVector.throwUnsupportedException()` was corrected, as it previously encouraged users to increase rather than reduce the batch size.
## How was this patch tested?
New units tests were added.
Author: Ala Luszczak <ala@databricks.com>
Closes#21206 from ala/overflow-reserve.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ApproximatePercentile` contains a workaround logic to compress the samples since at the beginning `QuantileSummaries` was ignoring the compression threshold. This problem was fixed in SPARK-17439, but the workaround logic was not removed. So we are compressing the samples many more times than needed: this could lead to critical performance degradation.
This can create serious performance issues in queries like:
```
select approx_percentile(id, array(0.1)) from range(10000000)
```
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21133 from mgaido91/SPARK-24013.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
filters like parquet row group filter, which is actually pushed to the data source but still to be evaluated by Spark, should also count as `pushedFilters`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21143 from cloud-fan/step1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I propose to support the `samplingRatio` option for schema inferring of CSV datasource similar to the same option of JSON datasource:
b14993e1fc/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala (L49-L50)
## How was this patch tested?
Added 2 tests for json and 2 tests for csv datasources. The tests checks that only subset of input dataset is used for schema inferring.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#20959 from MaxGekk/csv-sampling.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I propose new option for JSON datasource which allows to specify encoding (charset) of input and output files. Here is an example of using of the option:
```
spark.read.schema(schema)
.option("multiline", "true")
.option("encoding", "UTF-16LE")
.json(fileName)
```
If the option is not specified, charset auto-detection mechanism is used by default.
The option can be used for saving datasets to jsons. Currently Spark is able to save datasets into json files in `UTF-8` charset only. The changes allow to save data in any supported charset. Here is the approximate list of supported charsets by Oracle Java SE: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/intl/encoding.doc.html . An user can specify the charset of output jsons via the charset option like `.option("charset", "UTF-16BE")`. By default the output charset is still `UTF-8` to keep backward compatibility.
The solution has the following restrictions for per-line mode (`multiline = false`):
- If charset is different from UTF-8, the lineSep option must be specified. The option required because Hadoop LineReader cannot detect the line separator correctly. Here is the ticket for solving the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23725
- Encoding with [BOM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark) are not supported. For example, the `UTF-16` and `UTF-32` encodings are blacklisted. The problem can be solved by https://github.com/MaxGekk/spark-1/pull/2
## How was this patch tested?
I added the following tests:
- reads an json file in `UTF-16LE` encoding with BOM in `multiline` mode
- read json file by using charset auto detection (`UTF-32BE` with BOM)
- read json file using of user's charset (`UTF-16LE`)
- saving in `UTF-32BE` and read the result by standard library (not by Spark)
- checking that default charset is `UTF-8`
- handling wrong (unsupported) charset
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#20937 from MaxGekk/json-encoding-line-sep.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix `MemorySinkV2` toString() error
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21170 from wangyum/SPARK-22732.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the error messages we should return the SQL types (like `string` rather than the internal types like `StringType`).
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21181 from mgaido91/SPARK-23736_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace rate source with memory source in continuous mode test suite. Keep using "rate" source if the tests intend to put data periodically in background, or need to put short source name to load, since "memory" doesn't have provider for source.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran relevant test suite from IDE.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21152 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-23688.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Event `SparkListenerDriverAccumUpdates` may happen multiple times in a query - e.g. every `FileSourceScanExec` and `BroadcastExchangeExec` call `postDriverMetricUpdates`.
In Spark 2.2 `SQLListener` updated the map with new values. `SQLAppStatusListener` overwrites it.
Unless `update` preserved it in the KV store (dependant on `exec.lastWriteTime`), only the metrics from the last operator that does `postDriverMetricUpdates` are preserved.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test added.
Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>
Closes#21171 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-24104.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this case, the partition pruning happens before the planning phase of scalar subquery expressions.
For scalar subquery expressions, the planning occurs late in the cycle (after the physical planning) in "PlanSubqueries" just before execution. Currently we try to execute the scalar subquery expression as part of partition pruning and fail as it implements Unevaluable.
The fix attempts to ignore the Subquery expressions from partition pruning computation. Another option can be to somehow plan the subqueries before the partition pruning. Since this may not be a commonly occuring expression, i am opting for a simpler fix.
Repro
``` SQL
CREATE TABLE test_prc_bug (
id_value string
)
partitioned by (id_type string)
location '/tmp/test_prc_bug'
stored as parquet;
insert into test_prc_bug values ('1','a');
insert into test_prc_bug values ('2','a');
insert into test_prc_bug values ('3','b');
insert into test_prc_bug values ('4','b');
select * from test_prc_bug
where id_type = (select 'b');
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test in SubquerySuite and hive/SQLQuerySuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21174 from dilipbiswal/spark-24085.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A more informative message to tell you why a structured streaming query cannot continue if you have added more sources, than there are in the existing checkpoint offsets.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a Unit Test.
Author: Patrick McGloin <mcgloin.patrick@gmail.com>
Closes#20946 from patrickmcgloin/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This makes it easy to understand at runtime which version is running. Great for debugging production issues.
## How was this patch tested?
Not necessary.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21160 from tdas/SPARK-24094.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_join`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
The function accepts an `array` of `string` which is to be joined, a `string` which is the delimiter to use between the items of the first argument and optionally a `string` which is used to replace `null` values.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21011 from mgaido91/SPARK-23916.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
HIVE-15511 introduced the `roundOff` flag in order to disable the rounding to 8 digits which is performed in `months_between`. Since this can be a computational intensive operation, skipping it may improve performances when the rounding is not needed.
## How was this patch tested?
modified existing UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21008 from mgaido91/SPARK-23902.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added the `samplingRatio` option to the `json()` method of PySpark DataFrame Reader. Improving existing tests for Scala API according to review of the PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20959
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test for PySpark, updated 2 existing tests according to reviews of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20959 and added new negative test
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21056 from MaxGekk/json-sampling.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In some streaming queries, the input and processing rates are not calculated at all (shows up as zero) because MicroBatchExecution fails to associated metrics from the executed plan of a trigger with the sources in the logical plan of the trigger. The way this executed-plan-leaf-to-logical-source attribution works is as follows. With V1 sources, there was no way to identify which execution plan leaves were generated by a streaming source. So did a best-effort attempt to match logical and execution plan leaves when the number of leaves were same. In cases where the number of leaves is different, we just give up and report zero rates. An example where this may happen is as follows.
```
val cachedStaticDF = someStaticDF.union(anotherStaticDF).cache()
val streamingInputDF = ...
val query = streamingInputDF.join(cachedStaticDF).writeStream....
```
In this case, the `cachedStaticDF` has multiple logical leaves, but in the trigger's execution plan it only has leaf because a cached subplan is represented as a single InMemoryTableScanExec leaf. This leads to a mismatch in the number of leaves causing the input rates to be computed as zero.
With DataSourceV2, all inputs are represented in the executed plan using `DataSourceV2ScanExec`, each of which has a reference to the associated logical `DataSource` and `DataSourceReader`. So its easy to associate the metrics to the original streaming sources.
In this PR, the solution is as follows. If all the streaming sources in a streaming query as v2 sources, then use a new code path where the execution-metrics-to-source mapping is done directly. Otherwise we fall back to existing mapping logic.
## How was this patch tested?
- New unit tests using V2 memory source
- Existing unit tests using V1 source
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21126 from tdas/SPARK-24050.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed code so that `cache` could prevent any jobs from being triggered.
For example, in the current master, an operation below triggers a actual job;
```
val df = spark.range(10000000000L)
.filter('id > 1000)
.orderBy('id.desc)
.cache()
```
This triggers a job while the cache should be lazy. The problem is that, when creating `InMemoryRelation`, we build the RDD, which calls `SparkPlan.execute` and may trigger jobs, like sampling job for range partitioner, or broadcast job.
This pr removed the code to build a cached `RDD` in the constructor of `InMemoryRelation` and added `CachedRDDBuilder` to lazily build the `RDD` in `InMemoryRelation`. Then, the first call of `CachedRDDBuilder.cachedColumnBuffers` triggers a job to materialize the cache in `InMemoryTableScanExec` .
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CachedTableSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21018 from maropu/SPARK-23880.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Union of map and other compatible column result in unresolved operator 'Union; exception
Reproduction
`spark-sql>select map(1,2), 'str' union all select map(1,2,3,null), 1`
Output:
```
Error in query: unresolved operator 'Union;;
'Union
:- Project [map(1, 2) AS map(1, 2)#106, str AS str#107]
: +- OneRowRelation$
+- Project [map(1, cast(2 as int), 3, cast(null as int)) AS map(1, CAST(2 AS INT), 3, CAST(NULL AS INT))#109, 1 AS 1#108]
+- OneRowRelation$
```
So, we should cast part of columns to be compatible when appropriate.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test (query union of map and other columns) to SQLQueryTestSuite's union.sql.
Author: liutang123 <liutang123@yeah.net>
Closes#21100 from liutang123/SPARK-24012.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor continuous writing to its own class.
See WIP https://github.com/jose-torres/spark/pull/13 for the overall direction this is going, but I think this PR is very isolated and necessary anyway.
## How was this patch tested?
existing unit tests - refactoring only
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#21116 from jose-torres/SPARK-24038.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A structured streaming query with a streaming aggregation can throw the following error in rare cases.
```
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot commit after already committed or aborted
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$state$HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider$$verify(HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala:643)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider$HDFSBackedStateStore.commit(HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala:135)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreSaveExec$$anonfun$doExecute$3$$anon$2$$anonfun$hasNext$2.apply$mcV$sp(statefulOperators.scala:359)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreWriter$class.timeTakenMs(statefulOperators.scala:102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreSaveExec.timeTakenMs(statefulOperators.scala:251)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreSaveExec$$anonfun$doExecute$3$$anon$2.hasNext(statefulOperators.scala:359)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectAggregationIterator.processInputs(ObjectAggregationIterator.scala:188)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectAggregationIterator.<init>(ObjectAggregationIterator.scala:78)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectHashAggregateExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1$$anonfun$2.apply(ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala:114)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectHashAggregateExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1$$anonfun$2.apply(ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala:105)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:830)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:830)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:336)
```
This can happen when the following conditions are accidentally hit.
- Streaming aggregation with aggregation function that is a subset of [`TypedImperativeAggregation`](76b8b840dd/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala (L473)) (for example, `collect_set`, `collect_list`, `percentile`, etc.).
- Query running in `update}` mode
- After the shuffle, a partition has exactly 128 records.
This causes StateStore.commit to be called twice. See the [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23004) for a more detailed explanation. The solution is to use `NextIterator` or `CompletionIterator`, each of which has a flag to prevent the "onCompletion" task from being called more than once. In this PR, I chose to implement using `NextIterator`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test that I have confirm will fail without the fix.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21124 from tdas/SPARK-23004.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20988
`PhysicalOperation` can collect Project and Filters over a certain plan and substitute the alias with the original attributes in the bottom plan. We can use it in `OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery` rule to handle the Project and Filter over partitioned relation.
## How was this patch tested?
existing test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21111 from cloud-fan/refactor.
>What changes were proposed in this pull request?
During evaluation of IN conditions, if the source data frame, is represented by a plan, that uses hive table with columns, which were previously analysed, and the plan has conditions for these fields, that cannot be satisfied (which leads us to an empty data frame), FilterEstimation.evaluateInSet method produces NumberFormatException and ClassCastException.
In order to fix this bug, method FilterEstimation.evaluateInSet at first checks, if distinct count is not zero, and also checks if colStat.min and colStat.max are defined, and only in this case proceeds with the calculation. If at least one of the conditions is not satisfied, zero is returned.
>How was this patch tested?
In order to test the PR two tests were implemented: one in FilterEstimationSuite, that tests the plan with the statistics that violates the conditions mentioned above, and another one in StatisticsCollectionSuite, that test the whole process of analysis/optimisation of the query, that leads to the problems, mentioned in the first section.
Author: Mykhailo Shtelma <mykhailo.shtelma@bearingpoint.com>
Author: smikesh <mshtelma@gmail.com>
Closes#21052 from mshtelma/filter_estimation_evaluateInSet_Bugs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the OffsetWindowFunction's frame is `UnaryMinus(Literal(1))` but the specified window frame has been simplified to `Literal(-1)` by some optimizer rules e.g., `ConstantFolding`. Thus, they do not match and cause the following error:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Window Frame specifiedwindowframe(RowFrame, -1, -1) must match the required frame specifiedwindowframe(RowFrame, -1, -1);
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:41)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:91)
at
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21115 from gatorsmile/fixLag.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This updates the OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery rule to use filter expressions when listing partitions, if there are filter nodes in the logical plan. This avoids listing all partitions for large tables on the driver.
This also fixes a minor bug where the partitions returned from fsRelation cannot be serialized without hitting a stack level too deep error. This is caused by serializing a stream to executors, where the stream is a recursive structure. If the stream is too long, the serialization stack reaches the maximum level of depth. The fix is to create a LocalRelation using an Array instead of the incoming Seq.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests for metadata-only queries.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#20988 from rdblue/SPARK-23877-metadata-only-push-filters.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improving the test coverage of window functions focusing on missing test for window aggregate functions. No new UDAF test is added as it has been tested already.
## How was this patch tested?
Only new tests were added, automated tests were executed.
Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Author: Attila Zsolt Piros <2017933+attilapiros@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#20046 from attilapiros/SPARK-22362.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark SQL, we usually reuse the `UnsafeRow` instance and need to copy the data when a place buffers non-serialized objects.
Shuffle may buffer objects if we don't make it to the bypass merge shuffle or unsafe shuffle.
`ShuffleExchangeExec.needToCopyObjectsBeforeShuffle` misses the case that, if `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` is large enough, we could fail to run unsafe shuffle and go with the non-serialized shuffle.
This bug is very hard to hit since users wouldn't set such a large number of partitions(16 million) for Spark SQL exchange.
TODO: test
## How was this patch tested?
todo.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21101 from cloud-fan/shuffle.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `element_at`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
This function returns element of array at given index in value if column is array, or returns value for the given key in value if column is map.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21053 from kiszk/SPARK-23924.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_position`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
The function returns the position of the first occurrence of the element in array x (or 0 if not found) using 1-based index as BigInt.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21037 from kiszk/SPARK-23919.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
DataFrameRangeSuite.test("Cancelling stage in a query with Range.") stays sometimes in an infinite loop and times out the build.
There were multiple issues with the test:
1. The first valid stageId is zero when the test started alone and not in a suite and the following code waits until timeout:
```
eventually(timeout(10.seconds), interval(1.millis)) {
assert(DataFrameRangeSuite.stageToKill > 0)
}
```
2. The `DataFrameRangeSuite.stageToKill` was overwritten by the task's thread after the reset which ended up in canceling the same stage 2 times. This caused the infinite wait.
This PR solves this mentioned flakyness by removing the shared `DataFrameRangeSuite.stageToKill` and using `wait` and `CountDownLatch` for synhronization.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit test.
Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Closes#20888 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-23775.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o153.sql.
: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted.
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:223)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.run(InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala:189)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.ExecutedCommandExec.sideEffectResult$lzycompute(commands.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.ExecutedCommandExec.sideEffectResult(commands.scala:68)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.ExecutedCommandExec.executeCollect(commands.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$$anonfun$6.apply(Dataset.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$$anonfun$6.apply(Dataset.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$$anonfun$59.apply(Dataset.scala:3021)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withCustomExecutionEnv(SQLExecution.scala:89)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:127)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withAction(Dataset.scala:3020)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.<init>(Dataset.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$.ofRows(Dataset.scala:74)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:646)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor153.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:244)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:380)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:293)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:132)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:226)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Exception thrown in Future.get:
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec.doExecuteBroadcast(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.InputAdapter.doExecuteBroadcast(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:267)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec.doConsume(BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec.scala:530)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CodegenSupport$class.consume(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:155)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec.consume(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec.doConsume(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CodegenSupport$class.consume(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:155)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.consume(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:144)
...
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:190)
... 23 more
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Task not serializable
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:206)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec.doExecuteBroadcast(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:179)
... 276 more
Caused by: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Task not serializable
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.ensureSerializable(ClosureCleaner.scala:340)
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.org$apache$spark$util$ClosureCleaner$$clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:330)
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.clean(SparkContext.scala:2380)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndex$1.apply(RDD.scala:850)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndex$1.apply(RDD.scala:849)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:112)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.withScope(RDD.scala:371)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.mapPartitionsWithIndex(RDD.scala:849)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec.doExecute(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:417)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:123)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeQuery$3.apply(SparkPlan.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.prepareShuffleDependency(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:89)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1.apply(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:125)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1.apply(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:116)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.doExecute(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:116)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:123)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeQuery$3.apply(SparkPlan.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.InputAdapter.inputRDDs(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:271)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec.inputRDDs(HashAggregateExec.scala:181)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec.doExecute(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:414)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:123)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeQuery$3.apply(SparkPlan.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.collect.Collector$.collect(Collector.scala:61)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.collect.Collector$.collect(Collector.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeCollectResult(SparkPlan.scala:264)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec$$anon$1$$anonfun$call$1.apply(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec$$anon$1$$anonfun$call$1.apply(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:81)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:150)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec$$anon$1.call(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec$$anon$1.call(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:76)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
... 1 more
Caused by: java.nio.BufferUnderflowException
at java.nio.HeapByteBuffer.get(HeapByteBuffer.java:151)
at java.nio.ByteBuffer.get(ByteBuffer.java:715)
at org.apache.parquet.io.api.Binary$ByteBufferBackedBinary.getBytes(Binary.java:405)
at org.apache.parquet.io.api.Binary$ByteBufferBackedBinary.getBytesUnsafe(Binary.java:414)
at org.apache.parquet.io.api.Binary$ByteBufferBackedBinary.writeObject(Binary.java:484)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeWriteObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1128)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1496)
```
The Parquet filters are serializable but not thread safe. SparkPlan.prepare() could be called in different threads (BroadcastExchange will call it in a thread pool). Thus, we could serialize the same Parquet filter at the same time. This is not easily reproduced. The fix is to avoid serializing these Parquet filters in the driver. This PR is to avoid serializing these Parquet filters by moving the parquet filter generation from the driver to executors.
## How was this patch tested?
Having two queries one is a 1000-line SQL query and a 3000-line SQL query. Need to run at least one hour with a heavy write workload to reproduce once.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21086 from gatorsmile/taskNotSerializable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Each data source implementation can define its own options and teach its users how to set them. Spark doesn't have any restrictions about what options a data source should or should not have. It's possible that some options are very common and many data sources use them. However different data sources may define the common options(key and meaning) differently, which is quite confusing to end users.
This PR defines some standard options that data sources can optionally adopt: path, table and database.
## How was this patch tested?
a new test case.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#20535 from cloud-fan/options.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There was no check on nullability for arguments of `Tuple`s. This could lead to have weird behavior when a null value had to be deserialized into a non-nullable Scala object: in those cases, the `null` got silently transformed in a valid value (like `-1` for `Int`), corresponding to the default value we are using in the SQL codebase. This situation was very likely to happen when deserializing to a Tuple of primitive Scala types (like Double, Int, ...).
The PR adds the `AssertNotNull` to arguments of tuples which have been asked to be converted to non-nullable types.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20976 from mgaido91/SPARK-23835.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Unit tests for EpochCoordinator that test correct sequencing of committed epochs. Several tests are ignored since they test functionality implemented in SPARK-23503 which is not yet merged, otherwise they fail.
Author: Efim Poberezkin <efim@poberezkin.ru>
Closes#20983 from efimpoberezkin/pr/EpochCoordinator-tests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a memory source for continuous processing.
Note that only one of the ContinuousSuite tests is migrated to minimize the diff here. I'll submit a second PR for SPARK-23688 to change the rest and get rid of waitForRateSourceTriggers.
## How was this patch tested?
unit test
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#20828 from jose-torres/continuousMemory.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_min`. It takes an array as argument and returns the minimum value in it.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21025 from mgaido91/SPARK-23918.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_max`. It takes an array as argument and returns the maximum value in it.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21024 from mgaido91/SPARK-23917.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Checkpoint files (offset log files, state store files) in Structured Streaming must be written atomically such that no partial files are generated (would break fault-tolerance guarantees). Currently, there are 3 locations which try to do this individually, and in some cases, incorrectly.
1. HDFSOffsetMetadataLog - This uses a FileManager interface to use any implementation of `FileSystem` or `FileContext` APIs. It preferably loads `FileContext` implementation as FileContext of HDFS has atomic renames.
1. HDFSBackedStateStore (aka in-memory state store)
- Writing a version.delta file - This uses FileSystem APIs only to perform a rename. This is incorrect as rename is not atomic in HDFS FileSystem implementation.
- Writing a snapshot file - Same as above.
#### Current problems:
1. State Store behavior is incorrect - HDFS FileSystem implementation does not have atomic rename.
1. Inflexible - Some file systems provide mechanisms other than write-to-temp-file-and-rename for writing atomically and more efficiently. For example, with S3 you can write directly to the final file and it will be made visible only when the entire file is written and closed correctly. Any failure can be made to terminate the writing without making any partial files visible in S3. The current code does not abstract out this mechanism enough that it can be customized.
#### Solution:
1. Introduce a common interface that all 3 cases above can use to write checkpoint files atomically.
2. This interface must provide the necessary interfaces that allow customization of the write-and-rename mechanism.
This PR does that by introducing the interface `CheckpointFileManager` and modifying `HDFSMetadataLog` and `HDFSBackedStateStore` to use the interface. Similar to earlier `FileManager`, there are implementations based on `FileSystem` and `FileContext` APIs, and the latter implementation is preferred to make it work correctly with HDFS.
The key method this interface has is `createAtomic(path, overwrite)` which returns a `CancellableFSDataOutputStream` that has the method `cancel()`. All users of this method need to either call `close()` to successfully write the file, or `cancel()` in case of an error.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests in `CheckpointFileManagerSuite` and slightly modified existing tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21048 from tdas/SPARK-23966.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `PartitioningAwareFileIndex` accepts an optional parameter `userPartitionSchema`. If provided, it will combine the inferred partition schema with the parameter.
However,
1. to get `userPartitionSchema`, we need to combine inferred partition schema with `userSpecifiedSchema`
2. to get the inferred partition schema, we have to create a temporary file index.
Only after that, a final version of `PartitioningAwareFileIndex` can be created.
This can be improved by passing `userSpecifiedSchema` to `PartitioningAwareFileIndex`.
With the improvement, we can reduce redundant code and avoid parsing the file partition twice.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21004 from gengliangwang/PartitioningAwareFileIndex.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add UDF weekday
## How was this patch tested?
A new test
Author: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Closes#21009 from yucai/SPARK-23905.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Many suites currently leak Spark sessions (sometimes with stopped SparkContexts) via the thread-local active Spark session and default Spark session. We should attempt to clean these up and detect when this happens to improve the reproducibility of tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#21058 from ericl/clear-session.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add `collect` to a query executor as an action.
Seems `collect` / `collect` with Arrow are not recognised via `QueryExecutionListener` as an action. For example, if we have a custom listener as below:
```scala
package org.apache.spark.sql
import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution
import org.apache.spark.sql.util.QueryExecutionListener
class TestQueryExecutionListener extends QueryExecutionListener with Logging {
override def onSuccess(funcName: String, qe: QueryExecution, durationNs: Long): Unit = {
logError("Look at me! I'm 'onSuccess'")
}
override def onFailure(funcName: String, qe: QueryExecution, exception: Exception): Unit = { }
}
```
and set `spark.sql.queryExecutionListeners` to `org.apache.spark.sql.TestQueryExecutionListener`
Other operations in PySpark or Scala side seems fine:
```python
>>> sql("SELECT * FROM range(1)").show()
```
```
18/04/09 17:02:04 ERROR TestQueryExecutionListener: Look at me! I'm 'onSuccess'
+---+
| id|
+---+
| 0|
+---+
```
```scala
scala> sql("SELECT * FROM range(1)").collect()
```
```
18/04/09 16:58:41 ERROR TestQueryExecutionListener: Look at me! I'm 'onSuccess'
res1: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([0])
```
but ..
**Before**
```python
>>> sql("SELECT * FROM range(1)").collect()
```
```
[Row(id=0)]
```
```python
>>> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", "true")
>>> sql("SELECT * FROM range(1)").toPandas()
```
```
id
0 0
```
**After**
```python
>>> sql("SELECT * FROM range(1)").collect()
```
```
18/04/09 16:57:58 ERROR TestQueryExecutionListener: Look at me! I'm 'onSuccess'
[Row(id=0)]
```
```python
>>> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", "true")
>>> sql("SELECT * FROM range(1)").toPandas()
```
```
18/04/09 17:53:26 ERROR TestQueryExecutionListener: Look at me! I'm 'onSuccess'
id
0 0
```
## How was this patch tested?
I have manually tested as described above and unit test was added.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21007 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23942.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current SS continuous doesn't support processing on temp table or `df.as("xxx")`, SS will throw an exception as LogicalPlan not supported, details described in [here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23748).
So here propose to add this support.
## How was this patch tested?
new UT.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#21017 from jerryshao/SPARK-23748.
SQLMetricsTestUtils.currentExecutionIds() was racing with the listener
bus, which lead to some flaky tests. We should wait till the listener bus is
empty.
I tested by adding some Thread.sleep()s in SQLAppStatusListener, which
reproduced the exceptions I saw on Jenkins. With this change, they went
away.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes#21041 from squito/SPARK-23962.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Mark `HashAggregateExec.bufVars` as transient to avoid it from being serialized.
Also manually null out this field at the end of `doProduceWithoutKeys()` to shorten its lifecycle, because it'll no longer be used after that.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#21039 from rednaxelafx/codegen-improve.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR slightly refactors the newly added `ExprValue` API by quite a bit. The following changes are introduced:
1. `ExprValue` now uses the actual class instead of the class name as its type. This should give some more flexibility with generating code in the future.
2. Renamed `StatementValue` to `SimpleExprValue`. The statement concept is broader then an expression (untyped and it cannot be on the right hand side of an assignment), and this was not really what we were using it for. I have added a top level `JavaCode` trait that can be used in the future to reinstate (no pun intended) a statement a-like code fragment.
3. Added factory methods to the `JavaCode` companion object to make it slightly less verbose to create `JavaCode`/`ExprValue` objects. This is also what makes the diff quite large.
4. Added one more factory method to `ExprCode` to make it easier to create code-less expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#21026 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23951.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR #20886, I mistakenly check the table location only when `ignoreIfExists` is false, which was following the original deprecated PR.
That was wrong. When `ignoreIfExists` is true and the target table doesn't exist, we should also check the table location. In other word, **`ignoreIfExists` has nothing to do with table location validation**.
This is a follow-up PR to fix the mistake.
## How was this patch tested?
Add one unit test.
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21001 from gengliangwang/SPARK-19724-followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The codegen output of `Expression`, aka `ExprCode`, now encapsulates only strings of output value (`value`) and nullability (`isNull`). It makes difficulty for us to know what the output really is. I think it is better if we can add wrappers for the value and nullability that let us to easily know that.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20043 from viirya/SPARK-22856.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids possible overflow at an operation `long = (long)(int * int)`. The multiplication of large positive integer values may set one to MSB. This leads to a negative value in long while we expected a positive value (e.g. `0111_0000_0000_0000 * 0000_0000_0000_0010`).
This PR performs long cast before the multiplication to avoid this situation.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21002 from kiszk/SPARK-23893.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Proposed tests checks that only subset of input dataset is touched during schema inferring.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#20963 from MaxGekk/json-sampling-tests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Column.scala and Functions.scala have asc_nulls_first, asc_nulls_last, desc_nulls_first and desc_nulls_last. Add the corresponding python APIs in column.py and functions.py
## How was this patch tested?
Add doctest
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#20962 from huaxingao/spark-23847.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add docstring to clarify default window frame boundaries with and without orderBy clause
## How was this patch tested?
Manually generate doc and check.
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#20978 from icexelloss/SPARK-23861-window-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request tries to improve the error message for spark while reading parquet files with different schemas, e.g. One with a STRING column and the other with a INT column. A new ParquetSchemaColumnConvertNotSupportedException is added to replace the old UnsupportedOperationException. The Exception is again wrapped in FileScanRdd.scala to throw a more a general QueryExecutionException with the actual parquet file name which trigger the exception.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added to check the new exception and verify the error messages.
Also manually tested with two parquet with different schema to check the error message.
<img width="1125" alt="screen shot 2018-03-30 at 4 03 04 pm" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37087310/38156580-dd58a140-3433-11e8-973a-b816d859fbe1.png">
Author: Yuchen Huo <yuchen.huo@databricks.com>
Closes#20953 from yuchenhuo/SPARK-23822.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to finish https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
This JIRA is a follow up work after SPARK-19583
As we discussed in that PR
The following DDL for a managed table with an existed default location should throw an exception:
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...) AS SELECT ...
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...)
Currently there are some situations which are not consist with above logic:
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...) succeed with an existed default location
situation: for both hive/datasource(with HiveExternalCatalog/InMemoryCatalog)
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...) AS SELECT ...
situation: hive table succeed with an existed default location
This PR is going to make above two situations consist with the logic that it should throw an exception
with an existed default location.
## How was this patch tested?
unit test added
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#20886 from gengliangwang/pr-17272.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows us to use one of several types of `MemoryBlock`, such as byte array, int array, long array, or `java.nio.DirectByteBuffer`. To use `java.nio.DirectByteBuffer` allows to have off heap memory which is automatically deallocated by JVM. `MemoryBlock` class has primitive accessors like `Platform.getInt()`, `Platform.putint()`, or `Platform.copyMemory()`.
This PR uses `MemoryBlock` for `OffHeapColumnVector`, `UTF8String`, and other places. This PR can improve performance of operations involving memory accesses (e.g. `UTF8String.trim`) by 1.8x.
For now, this PR does not use `MemoryBlock` for `BufferHolder` based on cloud-fan's [suggestion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11494#issuecomment-309694290).
Since this PR is a successor of #11494, close#11494. Many codes were ported from #11494. Many efforts were put here. **I think this PR should credit to yzotov.**
This PR can achieve **1.1-1.4x performance improvements** for operations in `UTF8String` or `Murmur3_x86_32`. Other operations are almost comparable performances.
Without this PR
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Hash byte arrays with length 268435487: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murmur3_x86_32 526 / 536 0.0 131399881.5 1.0X
UTF8String benchmark: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashCode 525 / 552 1022.6 1.0 1.0X
substring 414 / 423 1298.0 0.8 1.3X
```
With this PR
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Hash byte arrays with length 268435487: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murmur3_x86_32 474 / 488 0.0 118552232.0 1.0X
UTF8String benchmark: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashCode 476 / 480 1127.3 0.9 1.0X
substring 287 / 291 1869.9 0.5 1.7X
```
Benchmark program
```
test("benchmark Murmur3_x86_32") {
val length = 8192 * 32768 + 31
val seed = 42L
val iters = 1 << 2
val random = new Random(seed)
val arrays = Array.fill[MemoryBlock](numArrays) {
val bytes = new Array[Byte](length)
random.nextBytes(bytes)
new ByteArrayMemoryBlock(bytes, Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, length)
}
val benchmark = new Benchmark("Hash byte arrays with length " + length,
iters * numArrays, minNumIters = 20)
benchmark.addCase("HiveHasher") { _: Int =>
var sum = 0L
for (_ <- 0L until iters) {
sum += HiveHasher.hashUnsafeBytesBlock(
arrays(i), Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, length)
}
}
benchmark.run()
}
test("benchmark UTF8String") {
val N = 512 * 1024 * 1024
val iters = 2
val benchmark = new Benchmark("UTF8String benchmark", N, minNumIters = 20)
val str0 = new java.io.StringWriter() { { for (i <- 0 until N) { write(" ") } } }.toString
val s0 = UTF8String.fromString(str0)
benchmark.addCase("hashCode") { _: Int =>
var h: Int = 0
for (_ <- 0L until iters) { h += s0.hashCode }
}
benchmark.addCase("substring") { _: Int =>
var s: UTF8String = null
for (_ <- 0L until iters) { s = s0.substring(N / 2 - 5, N / 2 + 5) }
}
benchmark.run()
}
```
I run [this benchmark program](https://gist.github.com/kiszk/94f75b506c93a663bbbc372ffe8f05de) using [the commit](ee5a79861c). I got the following results:
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12 on Linux 4.4.0-66-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Memory access benchmarks: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ByteArrayMemoryBlock get/putInt() 220 / 221 609.3 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putInt(byte[]) 220 / 236 610.9 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putInt(Object) 492 / 494 272.8 3.7 0.4X
OnHeapMemoryBlock get/putLong() 322 / 323 416.5 2.4 0.7X
long[] 221 / 221 608.0 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putLong(long[]) 321 / 321 418.7 2.4 0.7X
Platform get/putLong(Object) 561 / 563 239.2 4.2 0.4X
```
I also run [this benchmark program](https://gist.github.com/kiszk/5fdb4e03733a5d110421177e289d1fb5) for comparing performance of `Platform.copyMemory()`.
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12 on Linux 4.4.0-66-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Platform copyMemory: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Object to Object 1961 / 1967 8.6 116.9 1.0X
System.arraycopy Object to Object 1917 / 1921 8.8 114.3 1.0X
byte array to byte array 1961 / 1968 8.6 116.9 1.0X
System.arraycopy byte array to byte array 1909 / 1937 8.8 113.8 1.0X
int array to int array 1921 / 1990 8.7 114.5 1.0X
double array to double array 1918 / 1923 8.7 114.3 1.0X
Object to byte array 1961 / 1967 8.6 116.9 1.0X
Object to short array 1965 / 1972 8.5 117.1 1.0X
Object to int array 1910 / 1915 8.8 113.9 1.0X
Object to float array 1971 / 1978 8.5 117.5 1.0X
Object to double array 1919 / 1944 8.7 114.4 1.0X
byte array to Object 1959 / 1967 8.6 116.8 1.0X
int array to Object 1961 / 1970 8.6 116.9 1.0X
double array to Object 1917 / 1924 8.8 114.3 1.0X
```
These results show three facts:
1. According to the second/third or sixth/seventh results in the first experiment, if we use `Platform.get/putInt(Object)`, we achieve more than 2x worse performance than `Platform.get/putInt(byte[])` with concrete type (i.e. `byte[]`).
2. According to the second/third or fourth/fifth/sixth results in the first experiment, the fastest way to access an array element on Java heap is `array[]`. **Cons of `array[]` is that it is not possible to support unaligned-8byte access.**
3. According to the first/second/third or fourth/sixth/seventh results in the first experiment, `getInt()/putInt() or getLong()/putLong()` in subclasses of `MemoryBlock` can achieve comparable performance to `Platform.get/putInt()` or `Platform.get/putLong()` with concrete type (second or sixth result). There is no overhead regarding virtual call.
4. According to results in the second experiment, for `Platform.copy()`, to pass `Object` can achieve the same performance as to pass any type of primitive array as source or destination.
5. According to second/fourth results in the second experiment, `Platform.copy()` can achieve the same performance as `System.arrayCopy`. **It would be good to use `Platform.copy()` since `Platform.copy()` can take any types for src and dst.**
We are incrementally replace `Platform.get/putXXX` with `MemoryBlock.get/putXXX`. This is because we have two advantages.
1) Achieve better performance due to having a concrete type for an array.
2) Use simple OO design instead of passing `Object`
It is easy to use `MemoryBlock` in `InternalRow`, `BufferHolder`, `TaskMemoryManager`, and others that are already abstracted. It is not easy to use `MemoryBlock` in utility classes related to hashing or others.
Other candidates are
- UnsafeRow, UnsafeArrayData, UnsafeMapData, SpecificUnsafeRowJoiner
- UTF8StringBuffer
- BufferHolder
- TaskMemoryManager
- OnHeapColumnVector
- BytesToBytesMap
- CachedBatch
- classes for hash
- others.
## How was this patch tested?
Added `UnsafeMemoryAllocator`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19222 from kiszk/SPARK-10399.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the active spark session is set inconsistently (e.g., in createDataFrame, prior to query execution). Many places in spark also incorrectly query active session when they should be calling activeSession.getOrElse(defaultSession) and so might get None even if a Spark session exists.
The semantics here can be cleaned up if we also set the active session when the default session is set.
Related: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20926/files
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test, existing test. Note that if https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20926 merges first we should also update the tests there.
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#20927 from ericl/active-session-cleanup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Migrate foreach sink to DataSourceV2.
Since the previous attempt at this PR #20552, we've changed and strictly defined the lifecycle of writer components. This means we no longer need the complicated lifecycle shim from that PR; it just naturally works.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#20951 from jose-torres/foreach.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implemented the following cleanups related to `UnsafeWriter` class:
- Remove code duplication between `UnsafeRowWriter` and `UnsafeArrayWriter`
- Make `BufferHolder` class internal by delegating its accessor methods to `UnsafeWriter`
- Replace `UnsafeRow.setTotalSize(...)` with `UnsafeRowWriter.setTotalSize()`
## How was this patch tested?
Tested by existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20850 from kiszk/SPARK-23713.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the requiredChildDistribution does not specify the partitions. This can cause the weird corner cases where the child's distribution is `SinglePartition` which satisfies the required distribution of `ClusterDistribution(no-num-partition-requirement)`, thus eliminating the shuffle needed to repartition input data into the required number of partitions (i.e. same as state stores). That can lead to "file not found" errors on the state store delta files as the micro-batch-with-no-shuffle will not run certain tasks and therefore not generate the expected state store delta files.
This PR adds the required constraint on the number of partitions.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified test harness to always check that ANY stateful operator should have a constraint on the number of partitions. As part of that, the existing opt-in checks on child output partitioning were removed, as they are redundant.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#20941 from tdas/SPARK-23827.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to improve the test coverage of the original PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20687
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20911 from gatorsmile/addTests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Roll forward c68ec4e (#20688).
There are two minor test changes required:
* An error which used to be TreeNodeException[ArithmeticException] is no longer wrapped and is now just ArithmeticException.
* The test framework simply does not set the active Spark session. (Or rather, it doesn't do so early enough - I think it only happens when a query is analyzed.) I've added the required logic to SQLTestUtils.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#20922 from jose-torres/ratefix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR supports for pushing down filters for DateType in parquet
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT and tested in local.
Author: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Closes#20851 from yucai/SPARK-23727.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set default Spark session in the TestSparkSession and TestHiveSparkSession constructors.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit tests
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#20926 from jose-torres/test3.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add lineSep option for a configurable line separator in text datasource.
It supports this option by using `LineRecordReader`'s functionality with passing it to the constructor.
The approach is similar with https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20727; however, one main difference is, it uses text datasource's `lineSep` option to parse line by line in JSON's schema inference.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and unit tests were added.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20877 from HyukjinKwon/linesep-json.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR migrate micro batch rate source to V2 API and rewrite UTs to suite V2 test.
## How was this patch tested?
UTs.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#20688 from jerryshao/SPARK-23096.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an incorrect comparison in SQL between timestamp and date. This is because both of them are casted to `string` and then are compared lexicographically. This implementation shows `false` regarding this query `spark.sql("select cast('2017-03-01 00:00:00' as timestamp) between cast('2017-02-28' as date) and cast('2017-03-01' as date)").show`.
This PR shows `true` for this query by casting `date("2017-03-01")` to `timestamp("2017-03-01 00:00:00")`.
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Added new UTs to `TypeCoercionSuite`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20774 from kiszk/SPARK-23549.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added TPCDS v2.7 (latest) queries in `TPCDSQuerySuite` because the current `TPCDSQuerySuite` tests older one (v1.4) and some queries are different from v1.4 and v2.7. Since the original v2.7 queries have the syntaxes that Spark cannot parse, I changed these queries in a following way:
- [date] + 14 days -> date + `INTERVAL` 14 days
- [column name] as "30 days" -> [column name] as \`30 days\`
- Fix some syntax errors, e.g., missing brackets
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `TPCDSQuerySuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20343 from maropu/TPCDSV2_7.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The serializability test uses the same MemoryStream instance for 3 different queries. If any of those queries ask it to commit before the others have run, the rest will see empty dataframes. This can fail the test if q3 is affected.
We should use one instance per query instead.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit test. If I move q2.processAllAvailable() before starting q3, the test always fails without the fix.
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#20896 from jose-torres/fixrace.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should provide customized canonicalize plan for `InMemoryRelation` and `InMemoryTableScanExec`. Otherwise, we can wrongly treat two different cached plans as same result. It causes wrongly reused exchange then.
For a test query like this:
```scala
val cached = spark.createDataset(Seq(TestDataUnion(1, 2, 3), TestDataUnion(4, 5, 6))).cache()
val group1 = cached.groupBy("x").agg(min(col("y")) as "value")
val group2 = cached.groupBy("x").agg(min(col("z")) as "value")
group1.union(group2)
```
Canonicalized plans before:
First exchange:
```
Exchange hashpartitioning(none#0, 5)
+- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[none#0], functions=[partial_min(none#1)], output=[none#0, none#4])
+- *(1) InMemoryTableScan [none#0, none#1]
+- InMemoryRelation [x#4253, y#4254, z#4255], true, 10000, StorageLevel(disk, memory, deserialized, 1 replicas)
+- LocalTableScan [x#4253, y#4254, z#4255]
```
Second exchange:
```
Exchange hashpartitioning(none#0, 5)
+- *(3) HashAggregate(keys=[none#0], functions=[partial_min(none#1)], output=[none#0, none#4])
+- *(3) InMemoryTableScan [none#0, none#1]
+- InMemoryRelation [x#4253, y#4254, z#4255], true, 10000, StorageLevel(disk, memory, deserialized, 1 replicas)
+- LocalTableScan [x#4253, y#4254, z#4255]
```
You can find that they have the canonicalized plans are the same, although we use different columns in two `InMemoryTableScan`s.
Canonicalized plan after:
First exchange:
```
Exchange hashpartitioning(none#0, 5)
+- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[none#0], functions=[partial_min(none#1)], output=[none#0, none#4])
+- *(1) InMemoryTableScan [none#0, none#1]
+- InMemoryRelation [none#0, none#1, none#2], true, 10000, StorageLevel(memory, 1 replicas)
+- LocalTableScan [none#0, none#1, none#2]
```
Second exchange:
```
Exchange hashpartitioning(none#0, 5)
+- *(3) HashAggregate(keys=[none#0], functions=[partial_min(none#1)], output=[none#0, none#4])
+- *(3) InMemoryTableScan [none#0, none#2]
+- InMemoryRelation [none#0, none#1, none#2], true, 10000, StorageLevel(memory, 1 replicas)
+- LocalTableScan [none#0, none#1, none#2]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20831 from viirya/SPARK-23614.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As stated in Jira, there are problems with current `Uuid` expression which uses `java.util.UUID.randomUUID` for UUID generation.
This patch uses the newly added `RandomUUIDGenerator` for UUID generation. So we can make `Uuid` deterministic between retries.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20861 from viirya/SPARK-23599-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we allow writing data frames with empty schema into a file based datasource for certain file formats such as JSON, ORC etc. For formats such as Parquet and Text, we raise error at different times of execution. For text format, we return error from the driver early on in processing where as for format such as parquet, the error is raised from executor.
**Example**
spark.emptyDataFrame.write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").save(path)
**Results in**
``` SQL
org.apache.parquet.schema.InvalidSchemaException: Cannot write a schema with an empty group: message spark_schema {
}
at org.apache.parquet.schema.TypeUtil$1.visit(TypeUtil.java:27)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.TypeUtil$1.visit(TypeUtil.java:37)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.MessageType.accept(MessageType.java:58)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.TypeUtil.checkValidWriteSchema(TypeUtil.java:23)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetFileWriter.<init>(ParquetFileWriter.java:225)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputFormat.getRecordWriter(ParquetOutputFormat.java:342)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputFormat.getRecordWriter(ParquetOutputFormat.java:302)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetOutputWriter.<init>(ParquetOutputWriter.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetFileFormat$$anon$1.newInstance(ParquetFileFormat.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$SingleDirectoryWriteTask.newOutputWriter(FileFormatWriter.scala:376)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$SingleDirectoryWriteTask.execute(FileFormatWriter.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$sql$execution$datasources$FileFormatWriter$$executeTask$3.apply(FileFormatWriter.scala:278)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$sql$execution$datasources$FileFormatWriter$$executeTask$3.apply(FileFormatWriter.scala:276)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinallyAndFailureCallbacks(Utils.scala:1411)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$datasources$FileFormatWriter$$executeTask(FileFormatWriter.scala:281)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$$anonfun$write$1.apply(FileFormatWriter.scala:206)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$$anonfun$write$1.apply(FileFormatWriter.scala:205)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.
```
In this PR, we unify the error processing and raise error on attempt to write empty schema based dataframes into file based datasource (orc, parquet, text , csv, json etc) early on in the processing.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added in FileBasedDatasourceSuite.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#20579 from dilipbiswal/spark-23372.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Output metrics were not filled when parquet sink used.
This PR fixes this problem by passing a `BasicWriteJobStatsTracker` in `FileStreamSink`.
## How was this patch tested?
Additional unit test added.
Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Closes#20745 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-23288.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To fix `scala.MatchError` in `literals.sql.out`, this pr added an entry for `CalendarIntervalType` in `QueryExecution.toHiveStructString`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and added tests in `literals.sql`
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20872 from maropu/FixIntervalTests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add `lineSep` option for a configurable line separator in text datasource.
It supports this option by using `LineRecordReader`'s functionality with passing it to the constructor.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests and unit tests were added.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20727 from HyukjinKwon/linesep-text.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To drop `exprId`s for `Alias` in user-facing info., this pr added an entry for `Alias` in `NonSQLExpression.sql`
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `UDFSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20827 from maropu/SPARK-23666.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Report SinglePartition in DataSourceV2ScanExec when there's exactly 1 data reader factory.
Note that this means reader factories end up being constructed as partitioning is checked; let me know if you think that could be a problem.
## How was this patch tested?
existing unit tests
Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#20726 from jose-torres/SPARK-23574.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, some tests have an assumption that `spark.sql.sources.default=parquet`. In fact, that is a correct assumption, but that assumption makes it difficult to test new data source format.
This PR aims to
- Improve test suites more robust and makes it easy to test new data sources in the future.
- Test new native ORC data source with the full existing Apache Spark test coverage.
As an example, the PR uses `spark.sql.sources.default=orc` during reviews. The value should be `parquet` when this PR is accepted.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with updated tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#20705 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23553.
