## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to remove duplicated dependency checking logics and also print out skipped tests from unittests.
For example, as below:
```
Skipped tests in pyspark.sql.tests with pypy:
test_createDataFrame_column_name_encoding (pyspark.sql.tests.ArrowTests) ... skipped 'Pandas >= 0.19.2 must be installed; however, it was not found.'
test_createDataFrame_does_not_modify_input (pyspark.sql.tests.ArrowTests) ... skipped 'Pandas >= 0.19.2 must be installed; however, it was not found.'
...
Skipped tests in pyspark.sql.tests with python3:
test_createDataFrame_column_name_encoding (pyspark.sql.tests.ArrowTests) ... skipped 'PyArrow >= 0.8.0 must be installed; however, it was not found.'
test_createDataFrame_does_not_modify_input (pyspark.sql.tests.ArrowTests) ... skipped 'PyArrow >= 0.8.0 must be installed; however, it was not found.'
...
```
Currently, it's not printed out in the console. I think we should better print out skipped tests in the console.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested. Also, fortunately, Jenkins has good environment to test the skipped output.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21107 from HyukjinKwon/skipped-tests-print.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Print out the data type in the AssertionError message to make it more meaningful.
## How was this patch tested?
I manually tested the changed code on my local, but didn't add any test.
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21159 from huaxingao/spark-24057.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`colStat.min` AND `colStat.max` are empty for string type. Thus, `evaluateInSet` should not return zero when either `colStat.min` or `colStat.max`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21147 from gatorsmile/cached.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This makes it easy to understand at runtime which version is running. Great for debugging production issues.
## How was this patch tested?
Not necessary.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21160 from tdas/SPARK-24094.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For the details of the exception please see [SPARK-24062](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24062).
The issue is:
Spark on Yarn stores SASL secret in current UGI's credentials, this credentials will be distributed to AM and executors, so that executors and drive share the same secret to communicate. But STS/Hive library code will refresh the current UGI by UGI's loginFromKeytab() after Spark application is started, this will create a new UGI in the current driver's context with empty tokens and secret keys, so secret key is lost in the current context's UGI, that's why Spark driver throws secret key not found exception.
In Spark 2.2 code, Spark also stores this secret key in SecurityManager's class variable, so even UGI is refreshed, the secret is still existed in the object, so STS with SASL can still be worked in Spark 2.2. But in Spark 2.3, we always search key from current UGI, which makes it fail to work in Spark 2.3.
To fix this issue, there're two possible solutions:
1. Fix in STS/Hive library, when a new UGI is refreshed, copy the secret key from original UGI to the new one. The difficulty is that some codes to refresh the UGI is existed in Hive library, which makes us hard to change the code.
2. Roll back the logics in SecurityManager to match Spark 2.2, so that this issue can be fixed.
2nd solution seems a simple one. So I will propose a PR with 2nd solution.
## How was this patch tested?
Verified in local cluster.
CC vanzin tgravescs please help to review. Thanks!
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#21138 from jerryshao/SPARK-24062.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_join`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
The function accepts an `array` of `string` which is to be joined, a `string` which is the delimiter to use between the items of the first argument and optionally a `string` which is used to replace `null` values.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21011 from mgaido91/SPARK-23916.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
HIVE-15511 introduced the `roundOff` flag in order to disable the rounding to 8 digits which is performed in `months_between`. Since this can be a computational intensive operation, skipping it may improve performances when the rounding is not needed.
## How was this patch tested?
modified existing UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21008 from mgaido91/SPARK-23902.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added the `samplingRatio` option to the `json()` method of PySpark DataFrame Reader. Improving existing tests for Scala API according to review of the PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20959
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test for PySpark, updated 2 existing tests according to reviews of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20959 and added new negative test
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21056 from MaxGekk/json-sampling.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21100
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21154 from cloud-fan/test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In some streaming queries, the input and processing rates are not calculated at all (shows up as zero) because MicroBatchExecution fails to associated metrics from the executed plan of a trigger with the sources in the logical plan of the trigger. The way this executed-plan-leaf-to-logical-source attribution works is as follows. With V1 sources, there was no way to identify which execution plan leaves were generated by a streaming source. So did a best-effort attempt to match logical and execution plan leaves when the number of leaves were same. In cases where the number of leaves is different, we just give up and report zero rates. An example where this may happen is as follows.
```
val cachedStaticDF = someStaticDF.union(anotherStaticDF).cache()
val streamingInputDF = ...
val query = streamingInputDF.join(cachedStaticDF).writeStream....
```
In this case, the `cachedStaticDF` has multiple logical leaves, but in the trigger's execution plan it only has leaf because a cached subplan is represented as a single InMemoryTableScanExec leaf. This leads to a mismatch in the number of leaves causing the input rates to be computed as zero.
With DataSourceV2, all inputs are represented in the executed plan using `DataSourceV2ScanExec`, each of which has a reference to the associated logical `DataSource` and `DataSourceReader`. So its easy to associate the metrics to the original streaming sources.
In this PR, the solution is as follows. If all the streaming sources in a streaming query as v2 sources, then use a new code path where the execution-metrics-to-source mapping is done directly. Otherwise we fall back to existing mapping logic.
## How was this patch tested?
- New unit tests using V2 memory source
- Existing unit tests using V1 source
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21126 from tdas/SPARK-24050.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed code so that `cache` could prevent any jobs from being triggered.
For example, in the current master, an operation below triggers a actual job;
```
val df = spark.range(10000000000L)
.filter('id > 1000)
.orderBy('id.desc)
.cache()
```
This triggers a job while the cache should be lazy. The problem is that, when creating `InMemoryRelation`, we build the RDD, which calls `SparkPlan.execute` and may trigger jobs, like sampling job for range partitioner, or broadcast job.
This pr removed the code to build a cached `RDD` in the constructor of `InMemoryRelation` and added `CachedRDDBuilder` to lazily build the `RDD` in `InMemoryRelation`. Then, the first call of `CachedRDDBuilder.cachedColumnBuffers` triggers a job to materialize the cache in `InMemoryTableScanExec` .
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CachedTableSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21018 from maropu/SPARK-23880.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Union of map and other compatible column result in unresolved operator 'Union; exception
Reproduction
`spark-sql>select map(1,2), 'str' union all select map(1,2,3,null), 1`
Output:
```
Error in query: unresolved operator 'Union;;
'Union
:- Project [map(1, 2) AS map(1, 2)#106, str AS str#107]
: +- OneRowRelation$
+- Project [map(1, cast(2 as int), 3, cast(null as int)) AS map(1, CAST(2 AS INT), 3, CAST(NULL AS INT))#109, 1 AS 1#108]
+- OneRowRelation$
```
So, we should cast part of columns to be compatible when appropriate.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test (query union of map and other columns) to SQLQueryTestSuite's union.sql.
Author: liutang123 <liutang123@yeah.net>
Closes#21100 from liutang123/SPARK-24012.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor continuous writing to its own class.
See WIP https://github.com/jose-torres/spark/pull/13 for the overall direction this is going, but I think this PR is very isolated and necessary anyway.
## How was this patch tested?
existing unit tests - refactoring only
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#21116 from jose-torres/SPARK-24038.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the driver side of the Kafka source (i.e. KafkaMicroBatchReader) eagerly creates a consumer as soon as the Kafk aMicroBatchReader is created. However, we create dummy KafkaMicroBatchReader to get the schema and immediately stop it. Its better to make the consumer creation lazy, it will be created on the first attempt to fetch offsets using the KafkaOffsetReader.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21134 from tdas/SPARK-24056.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Instruments logging improvements - ML regression package
I add an `OptionalInstrument` class which used in `WeightLeastSquares` and `IterativelyReweightedLeastSquares`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Closes#21078 from WeichenXu123/inst_reg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We save ML's user-supplied params and default params as one entity in metadata. During loading the saved models, we set all the loaded params into created ML model instances as user-supplied params.
It causes some problems, e.g., if we strictly disallow some params to be set at the same time, a default param can fail the param check because it is treated as user-supplied param after loading.
The loaded default params should not be set as user-supplied params. We should save ML default params separately in metadata.
For backward compatibility, when loading metadata, if it is a metadata file from previous Spark, we shouldn't raise error if we can't find the default param field.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass existing tests and added tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20633 from viirya/save-ml-default-params.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Adds a `hadoop-3.1` profile build depending on the hadoop-3.1 artifacts.
1. In the hadoop-cloud module, adds an explicit hadoop-3.1 profile which switches from explicitly pulling in cloud connectors (hadoop-openstack, hadoop-aws, hadoop-azure) to depending on the hadoop-cloudstorage POM artifact, which pulls these in, has pre-excluded things like hadoop-common, and stays up to date with new connectors (hadoop-azuredatalake, hadoop-allyun). Goal: it becomes the Hadoop projects homework of keeping this clean, and the spark project doesn't need to handle new hadoop releases adding more dependencies.
1. the hadoop-cloud/hadoop-3.1 profile also declares support for jetty-ajax and jetty-util to ensure that these jars get into the distribution jar directory when needed by unshaded libraries.
1. Increases the curator and zookeeper versions to match those in hadoop-3, fixing spark core to build in sbt with the hadoop-3 dependencies.
## How was this patch tested?
* Everything this has been built and tested against both ASF Hadoop branch-3.1 and hadoop trunk.
* spark-shell was used to create connectors to all the stores and verify that file IO could take place.
The spark hive-1.2.1 JAR has problems here, as it's version check logic fails for Hadoop versions > 2.
This can be avoided with either of
* The hadoop JARs built to declare their version as Hadoop 2.11 `mvn install -DskipTests -DskipShade -Ddeclared.hadoop.version=2.11` . This is safe for local test runs, not for deployment (HDFS is very strict about cross-version deployment).
* A modified version of spark hive whose version check switch statement is happy with hadoop 3.
I've done both, with maven and SBT.
Three issues surfaced
1. A spark-core test failure —fixed in SPARK-23787.
1. SBT only: Zookeeper not being found in spark-core. Somehow curator 2.12.0 triggers some slightly different dependency resolution logic from previous versions, and Ivy was missing zookeeper.jar entirely. This patch adds the explicit declaration for all spark profiles, setting the ZK version = 3.4.9 for hadoop-3.1
1. Marking jetty-utils as provided in spark was stopping hadoop-azure from being able to instantiate the azure wasb:// client; it was using jetty-util-ajax, which could then not find a class in jetty-util.
Author: Steve Loughran <stevel@hortonworks.com>
Closes#20923 from steveloughran/cloud/SPARK-23807-hadoop-31.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Multiple possible input types is added in validateAndTransformSchema() and computeCost() while checking column type
- Add if statement in transform() to support array type as featuresCol
- Add the case statement in fit() while selecting columns from dataset
These changes will be applied to KMeans first, then to other clustering method
## How was this patch tested?
unit test is added
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Lu WANG <lu.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21081 from ludatabricks/SPARK-23975.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
By default, the dynamic allocation will request enough executors to maximize the
parallelism according to the number of tasks to process. While this minimizes the
latency of the job, with small tasks this setting can waste a lot of resources due to
executor allocation overhead, as some executor might not even do any work.
This setting allows to set a ratio that will be used to reduce the number of
target executors w.r.t. full parallelism.
The number of executors computed with this setting is still fenced by
`spark.dynamicAllocation.maxExecutors` and `spark.dynamicAllocation.minExecutors`
## How was this patch tested?
Units tests and runs on various actual workloads on a Yarn Cluster
Author: Julien Cuquemelle <j.cuquemelle@criteo.com>
Closes#19881 from jcuquemelle/AddTaskPerExecutorSlot.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is a follow-up of #20980 and fixes code to reuse `InternalRow` for converting input keys/values in `ExternalMapToCatalyst` eval.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21137 from maropu/SPARK-23589-FOLLOWUP.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-23375 we introduced the ability of removing `Sort` operation during query optimization if the data is already sorted. In this follow-up we remove also a `Sort` which is followed by another `Sort`: in this case the first sort is not needed and can be safely removed.
The PR starts from henryr's comment: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560#discussion_r180601594. So credit should be given to him.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21072 from mgaido91/SPARK-23973.
"childOption" is for the remote connections, not for the server socket
that actually listens for incoming connections.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#21132 from vanzin/SPARK-24029.2.
TaskSetManager.hasAttemptOnHost had a misleading comment. The comment
said that it only checked for running tasks, but really it checked for
any tasks that might have run in the past as well. This updates to line
up with the implementation.
Author: wuyi <ngone_5451@163.com>
Closes#20998 from Ngone51/SPARK-23888.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding PMML export to Spark ML's KMeans Model.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test for Spark ML PMML export based on the old Spark MLlib unit test.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Closes#20907 from holdenk/SPARK-11237-Add-PMML-Export-for-KMeans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A structured streaming query with a streaming aggregation can throw the following error in rare cases.
```
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot commit after already committed or aborted
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$state$HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider$$verify(HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala:643)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider$HDFSBackedStateStore.commit(HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala:135)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreSaveExec$$anonfun$doExecute$3$$anon$2$$anonfun$hasNext$2.apply$mcV$sp(statefulOperators.scala:359)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreWriter$class.timeTakenMs(statefulOperators.scala:102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreSaveExec.timeTakenMs(statefulOperators.scala:251)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StateStoreSaveExec$$anonfun$doExecute$3$$anon$2.hasNext(statefulOperators.scala:359)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectAggregationIterator.processInputs(ObjectAggregationIterator.scala:188)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectAggregationIterator.<init>(ObjectAggregationIterator.scala:78)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectHashAggregateExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1$$anonfun$2.apply(ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala:114)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.ObjectHashAggregateExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1$$anonfun$2.apply(ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala:105)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:830)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:830)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:336)
```
This can happen when the following conditions are accidentally hit.
- Streaming aggregation with aggregation function that is a subset of [`TypedImperativeAggregation`](76b8b840dd/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala (L473)) (for example, `collect_set`, `collect_list`, `percentile`, etc.).
- Query running in `update}` mode
- After the shuffle, a partition has exactly 128 records.
This causes StateStore.commit to be called twice. See the [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23004) for a more detailed explanation. The solution is to use `NextIterator` or `CompletionIterator`, each of which has a flag to prevent the "onCompletion" task from being called more than once. In this PR, I chose to implement using `NextIterator`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test that I have confirm will fail without the fix.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21124 from tdas/SPARK-23004.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is reported by Spark users that the deviance calculation for poisson regression does not handle y = 0. Thus, the correct model summary cannot be obtained. The user has confirmed the the issue is in
```
override def deviance(y: Double, mu: Double, weight: Double): Double =
{ 2.0 * weight * (y * math.log(y / mu) - (y - mu)) }
when y = 0.
```
The user also mentioned there are many other places he believe we should check the same thing. However, no other changes are needed, including Gamma distribution.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a comparison with R deviance calculation to the existing unit test.
Author: Teng Peng <josephtengpeng@gmail.com>
Closes#21125 from tengpeng/Spark24024GLM.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr supported interpreted mode for `ExternalMapToCatalyst`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20980 from maropu/SPARK-23589.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The existing query constraints framework has 2 steps:
1. propagate constraints bottom up.
2. use constraints to infer additional filters for better data pruning.
For step 2, it mostly helps with Join, because we can connect the constraints from children to the join condition and infer powerful filters to prune the data of the join sides. e.g., the left side has constraints `a = 1`, the join condition is `left.a = right.a`, then we can infer `right.a = 1` to the right side and prune the right side a lot.
However, the current logic of inferring filters from constraints for Join is pretty weak. It infers the filters from Join's constraints. Some joins like left semi/anti exclude output from right side and the right side constraints will be lost here.
This PR propose to check the left and right constraints individually, expand the constraints with join condition and add filters to children of join directly, instead of adding to the join condition.
This reverts https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670 , covers https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20717 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20816
This is inspired by the original PRs and the tests are all from these PRs. Thanks to the authors mgaido91 maryannxue KaiXinXiaoLei !
## How was this patch tested?
new tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21083 from cloud-fan/join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20988
`PhysicalOperation` can collect Project and Filters over a certain plan and substitute the alias with the original attributes in the bottom plan. We can use it in `OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery` rule to handle the Project and Filter over partitioned relation.
## How was this patch tested?
existing test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21111 from cloud-fan/refactor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As viirya pointed out [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222#discussion_r179910484), this PR explicitly frees unused off-heap memory in `MemoryBlockSuite`
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21117 from kiszk/SPARK-10399-free-offheap.
>What changes were proposed in this pull request?
During evaluation of IN conditions, if the source data frame, is represented by a plan, that uses hive table with columns, which were previously analysed, and the plan has conditions for these fields, that cannot be satisfied (which leads us to an empty data frame), FilterEstimation.evaluateInSet method produces NumberFormatException and ClassCastException.
In order to fix this bug, method FilterEstimation.evaluateInSet at first checks, if distinct count is not zero, and also checks if colStat.min and colStat.max are defined, and only in this case proceeds with the calculation. If at least one of the conditions is not satisfied, zero is returned.
>How was this patch tested?
In order to test the PR two tests were implemented: one in FilterEstimationSuite, that tests the plan with the statistics that violates the conditions mentioned above, and another one in StatisticsCollectionSuite, that test the whole process of analysis/optimisation of the query, that leads to the problems, mentioned in the first section.
Author: Mykhailo Shtelma <mykhailo.shtelma@bearingpoint.com>
Author: smikesh <mshtelma@gmail.com>
Closes#21052 from mshtelma/filter_estimation_evaluateInSet_Bugs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the OffsetWindowFunction's frame is `UnaryMinus(Literal(1))` but the specified window frame has been simplified to `Literal(-1)` by some optimizer rules e.g., `ConstantFolding`. Thus, they do not match and cause the following error:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Window Frame specifiedwindowframe(RowFrame, -1, -1) must match the required frame specifiedwindowframe(RowFrame, -1, -1);
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:41)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:91)
at
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21115 from gatorsmile/fixLag.
This allows sockets to be bound even if there are sockets
from a previous application that are still pending closure. It
avoids bind issues when, for example, re-starting the SHS.
Don't enable the option on Windows though. The following page
explains some odd behavior that this option can have there:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms740621%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
I intentionally ignored server sockets that always bind to
ephemeral ports, since those don't benefit from this option.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#21110 from vanzin/SPARK-24029.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr supported interpreted mode for `ValidateExternalType`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20757 from maropu/SPARK-23595.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is a follow-up pr of #20979 and fixes code to resolve a map builder method per execution instead of per row in `CatalystToExternalMap`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21112 from maropu/SPARK-23588-FOLLOWUP.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This updates the OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery rule to use filter expressions when listing partitions, if there are filter nodes in the logical plan. This avoids listing all partitions for large tables on the driver.
This also fixes a minor bug where the partitions returned from fsRelation cannot be serialized without hitting a stack level too deep error. This is caused by serializing a stream to executors, where the stream is a recursive structure. If the stream is too long, the serialization stack reaches the maximum level of depth. The fix is to create a LocalRelation using an Array instead of the incoming Seq.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests for metadata-only queries.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#20988 from rdblue/SPARK-23877-metadata-only-push-filters.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkContextSuite.test("Cancelling stages/jobs with custom reasons.") could stay in an infinite loop because of the problem found and fixed in [SPARK-23775](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23775).
This PR solves this mentioned flakyness by removing shared variable usages when cancel happens in a loop and using wait and CountDownLatch for synhronization.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit test.
Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Closes#21105 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-24022.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improving the test coverage of window functions focusing on missing test for window aggregate functions. No new UDAF test is added as it has been tested already.
## How was this patch tested?
Only new tests were added, automated tests were executed.
Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Author: Attila Zsolt Piros <2017933+attilapiros@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#20046 from attilapiros/SPARK-22362.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds PowerIterationClustering as a Transformer to spark.ml. In the transform method, it calls spark.mllib's PowerIterationClustering.run() method and transforms the return value assignments (the Kmeans output of the pseudo-eigenvector) as a DataFrame (id: LongType, cluster: IntegerType).
This PR is copied and modified from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770 The primary author is wangmiao1981
## How was this patch tested?
This PR has 2 types of tests:
* Copies of tests from spark.mllib's PIC tests
* New tests specific to the spark.ml APIs
Author: wm624@hotmail.com <wm624@hotmail.com>
Author: wangmiao1981 <wm624@hotmail.com>
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#21090 from jkbradley/wangmiao1981-pic.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark SQL, we usually reuse the `UnsafeRow` instance and need to copy the data when a place buffers non-serialized objects.
Shuffle may buffer objects if we don't make it to the bypass merge shuffle or unsafe shuffle.
`ShuffleExchangeExec.needToCopyObjectsBeforeShuffle` misses the case that, if `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` is large enough, we could fail to run unsafe shuffle and go with the non-serialized shuffle.
This bug is very hard to hit since users wouldn't set such a large number of partitions(16 million) for Spark SQL exchange.
TODO: test
## How was this patch tested?
todo.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21101 from cloud-fan/shuffle.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There‘s a miswrite in BlacklistTracker's updateBlacklistForFetchFailure:
```
val blacklistedExecsOnNode =
nodeToBlacklistedExecs.getOrElseUpdate(exec, HashSet[String]())
blacklistedExecsOnNode += exec
```
where first **exec** should be **host**.
## How was this patch tested?
adjust existed test.
Author: wuyi <ngone_5451@163.com>
Closes#21104 from Ngone51/SPARK-24021.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we find the wider common type by comparing the two types from left to right, this can be a problem when you have two data types which don't have a common type but each can be promoted to StringType.
For instance, if you have a table with the schema:
[c1: date, c2: string, c3: int]
The following succeeds:
SELECT coalesce(c1, c2, c3) FROM table
While the following produces an exception:
SELECT coalesce(c1, c3, c2) FROM table
This is only a issue when the seq of dataTypes contains `StringType` and all the types can do string promotion.
close#19033
## How was this patch tested?
Add test in `TypeCoercionSuite`
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#21074 from jiangxb1987/typeCoercion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr address comments in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19868 ;
Fix the code style for `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.QueryPartitionSuite` by using:
`withTempView`, `withTempDir`, `withTable`...
Author: jinxing <jinxing6042@126.com>
Closes#21091 from jinxing64/SPARK-22676-FOLLOW-UP.
