### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733 and #28805, CNF conversion is used to push down disjunctive predicates through join and partitions pruning.
It's a good improvement, however, converting all the predicates in CNF can lead to a very long result, even with grouping functions over expressions. For example, for the following predicate
```
(p0 = '1' AND p1 = '1') OR (p0 = '2' AND p1 = '2') OR (p0 = '3' AND p1 = '3') OR (p0 = '4' AND p1 = '4') OR (p0 = '5' AND p1 = '5') OR (p0 = '6' AND p1 = '6') OR (p0 = '7' AND p1 = '7') OR (p0 = '8' AND p1 = '8') OR (p0 = '9' AND p1 = '9') OR (p0 = '10' AND p1 = '10') OR (p0 = '11' AND p1 = '11') OR (p0 = '12' AND p1 = '12') OR (p0 = '13' AND p1 = '13') OR (p0 = '14' AND p1 = '14') OR (p0 = '15' AND p1 = '15') OR (p0 = '16' AND p1 = '16') OR (p0 = '17' AND p1 = '17') OR (p0 = '18' AND p1 = '18') OR (p0 = '19' AND p1 = '19') OR (p0 = '20' AND p1 = '20')
```
will be converted into a long query(130K characters) in Hive metastore, and there will be error:
```
javax.jdo.JDOException: Exception thrown when executing query : SELECT DISTINCT 'org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.model.MPartition' AS NUCLEUS_TYPE,A0.CREATE_TIME,A0.LAST_ACCESS_TIME,A0.PART_NAME,A0.PART_ID,A0.PART_NAME AS NUCORDER0 FROM PARTITIONS A0 LEFT OUTER JOIN TBLS B0 ON A0.TBL_ID = B0.TBL_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN DBS C0 ON B0.DB_ID = C0.DB_ID WHERE B0.TBL_NAME = ? AND C0."NAME" = ? AND ((((((A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=1' ESCAPE '\' ) OR (A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=2' ESCAPE '\' )) OR (A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=3' ESCAPE '\' )) OR ((A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=4' ESCAPE '\' ) O ...
```
Essentially, we just need to traverse predicate and extract the convertible sub-predicates like what we did in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24598. There is no need to maintain the CNF result set.
### Why are the changes needed?
A better implementation for pushing down disjunctive and complex predicates. The pushed down predicates is always equal or shorter than the CNF result.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#29101 from gengliangwang/pushJoin.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
d0c83f372b