### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Adds following overloaded variants to Scala `o.a.s.sql.functions`:
- `percentile_approx(e: Column, percentage: Array[Double], accuracy: Long): Column`
- `percentile_approx(columnName: String, percentage: Array[Double], accuracy: Long): Column`
- `percentile_approx(e: Column, percentage: Double, accuracy: Long): Column`
- `percentile_approx(columnName: String, percentage: Double, accuracy: Long): Column`
- `percentile_approx(e: Column, percentage: Seq[Double], accuracy: Long): Column` (primarily for
Python interop).
- `percentile_approx(columnName: String, percentage: Seq[Double], accuracy: Long): Column`
- Adds `percentile_approx` to `pyspark.sql.functions`.
- Adds `percentile_approx` function to SparkR.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we support `percentile_approx` only in SQL expression. It is inconvenient and makes this function relatively unknown.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New unit tests for SparkR an PySpark.
As for now there are no additional tests in Scala API ‒ `ApproximatePercentile` is well tested and Python (including docstrings) and R tests provide additional tests, so it seems unnecessary.
Closes#27278 from zero323/SPARK-30569.
Lead-authored-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As discovered here https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27910#issuecomment-599027190, pydocstyle tests were not running anywhere (not on Jenkins; not on GitHub).
~This PR enables those tests.~
It also seems like a [large hill to climb](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27912#issuecomment-599167117) to enable any meaningful checks, so we're going to just rip pydocstyle out for now.
### Why are the changes needed?
Presumably, we defined those doc style tests because we care about whatever it is they enforce. Since we're not actually testing anything, though, it's better to clear the cruft.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Will check the GitHub workflow logs on this PR.
Closes#27912 from nchammas/SPARK-31155-pydocstyle.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@liveramp.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fix#26956
Wrap try-catch on `fs.getFileStatus(path)` within acl/permission in case of the path doesn't exist.
### Why are the changes needed?
`truncate table` may fail to re-create path in case of interruption or something else. As a result, next time we `truncate table` on the same table with acl/permission, it will fail due to `FileNotFoundException`. And it also brings behavior change compares to previous Spark version, which could still `truncate table` successfully even if the path doesn't exist.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#27923 from Ngone51/fix_truncate.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is kind of a followup of #26808. It leverages the helper method for aliasing in built-in SQL expressions to use the alias as its output column name where it's applicable.
- `Expression`, `UnaryMathExpression` and `BinaryMathExpression` search the alias in the tags by default.
- When the naming is different in its implementation, it has to be overwritten for the expression specifically. E.g., `CallMethodViaReflection`, `Remainder`, `CurrentTimestamp`,
`FormatString` and `XPathDouble`.
This PR fixes the aliases of the functions below:
| class | alias |
|--------------------------|------------------|
|`Rand` |`random` |
|`Ceil` |`ceiling` |
|`Remainder` |`mod` |
|`Pow` |`pow` |
|`Signum` |`sign` |
|`Chr` |`char` |
|`Length` |`char_length` |
|`Length` |`character_length`|
|`FormatString` |`printf` |
|`Substring` |`substr` |
|`Upper` |`ucase` |
|`XPathDouble` |`xpath_number` |
|`DayOfMonth` |`day` |
|`CurrentTimestamp` |`now` |
|`Size` |`cardinality` |
|`Sha1` |`sha` |
|`CallMethodViaReflection` |`java_method` |
Note: `EqualTo`, `=` and `==` aliases were excluded because it's unable to leverage this helper method. It should fix the parser.
Note: this PR also excludes some instances such as `ToDegrees`, `ToRadians`, `UnaryMinus` and `UnaryPositive` that needs an explicit name overwritten to make the scope of this PR smaller.
### Why are the changes needed?
To respect expression name.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it will change the output column name.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and unittests were added.
Closes#27901 from HyukjinKwon/31146.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
jira link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30930
Remove ML/MLLIB DeveloperApi annotations.
### Why are the changes needed?
The Developer APIs in ML/MLLIB have been there for a long time. They are stable now and are very unlikely to be changed or removed, so I unmark these Developer APIs in this PR.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. DeveloperApi annotations are removed from docs.
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27859 from huaxingao/spark-30930.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR (SPARK-31116) add caseSensitive parameter to ParquetRowConverter so that it handle materialize parquet properly with respect to case sensitivity
### Why are the changes needed?
From spark 3.0.0, below statement throws IllegalArgumentException in caseInsensitive mode because of explicit field index searching in ParquetRowConverter. As we already constructed parquet requested schema and catalyst requested schema during schema clipping in ParquetReadSupport, just follow these behavior.
```scala
val path = "/some/temp/path"
spark
.range(1L)
.selectExpr("NAMED_STRUCT('lowercase', id, 'camelCase', id + 1) AS StructColumn")
.write.parquet(path)
val caseInsensitiveSchema = new StructType()
.add(
"StructColumn",
new StructType()
.add("LowerCase", LongType)
.add("camelcase", LongType))
spark.read.schema(caseInsensitiveSchema).parquet(path).show()
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. The changes are only in unreleased branches (`master` and `branch-3.0`).
### How was this patch tested?
Passed new test cases that check parquet column selection with respect to schemas and case sensitivities
Closes#27888 from kimtkyeom/parquet_row_converter_case_sensitivity.
Authored-by: Tae-kyeom, Kim <kimtkyeom@devsisters.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR will add the user guide for AQE and the detailed configurations about the three mainly features in AQE.
### Why are the changes needed?
Add the detailed configurations.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
only add doc no need ut.
Closes#27616 from JkSelf/aqeuserguide.
Authored-by: jiake <ke.a.jia@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move the code related to days rebasing from/to Julian calendar from `HiveInspectors` to new class `DaysWritable`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve maintainability of the `HiveInspectors` trait which is already pretty complex.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By `HiveOrcHadoopFsRelationSuite`.
Closes#27890 from MaxGekk/replace-DateWritable-by-DaysWritable.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's not needed at all as now we replace "y" with "u" if there is no "G". So the era is either explicitly specified (e.g. "yyyy G") or can be inferred from the year (e.g. "uuuu").
### Why are the changes needed?
By default we use "uuuu" as the year pattern, which indicates the era already. If we set a default era, it can get conflicted and fail the parsing.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yea, now spark can parse date/timestamp with negative year via the "yyyy" pattern, which will be converted to "uuuu" under the hood.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27707 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrdade `docker-client` version.
### Why are the changes needed?
`docker-client` what Spark uses is super old. Snippet from the project page:
```
Spotify no longer uses recent versions of this project internally.
The version of docker-client we're using is whatever helios has in its pom.xml. => 8.14.1
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
```
build/mvn install -DskipTests
build/mvn -Pdocker-integration-tests -pl :spark-docker-integration-tests_2.12 -Dtest=none -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.DB2IntegrationSuite test`
build/mvn -Pdocker-integration-tests -pl :spark-docker-integration-tests_2.12 -Dtest=none -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.MsSqlServerIntegrationSuite test`
build/mvn -Pdocker-integration-tests -pl :spark-docker-integration-tests_2.12 -Dtest=none -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.PostgresIntegrationSuite test`
```
Closes#27892 from gaborgsomogyi/docker-client.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the IllegalArgumentException in broadcast exchange when numRows over 341 million but less than 512 million.
Since the maximum number of keys that `BytesToBytesMap` supports is 1 << 29, and only 70% of the slots can be used before growing in `HashedRelation`, So here the limitation should not be greater equal than 341 million (1 << 29 / 1.5(357913941)) instead of 512 million.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually test.
Closes#27828 from LantaoJin/SPARK-31068.
Lead-authored-by: LantaoJin <jinlantao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alan Jin <jinlantao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
…a sbt on Intellij IDEA.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Read from java property "sbt.maven.profiles", the maven profiles to be enabled while importing to intellij IDEA via SBT.
### Why are the changes needed?
Without this change one needs to set an os-wide environment variable `SBT_MAVEN_PROFILES`, on mac it is even trickier (I have not figured out, what can be done).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested by applying multiple profiles or a single profile.
Please see the attached images to see the steps.
<img width="802" alt="Screenshot 2020-03-11 at 4 09 57 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/992952/76411667-46223280-63b8-11ea-9a77-dc014b66d48b.png">
<img width="867" alt="Screenshot 2020-03-11 at 4 18 09 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/992952/76411676-4ae6e680-63b8-11ea-895d-ed9d6cc223c5.png">
Closes#27878 from ScrapCodes/SPARK-31120/idea-load-maven-profiles.
Authored-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR cleans up several failures -- most of them silent -- in `dev/lint-python`. I don't understand how we haven't been bitten by these yet. Perhaps we've been lucky?
Fixes include:
* Fix how we compare versions. All the version checks currently in `master` silently fail with:
```
File "<string>", line 2
print(LooseVersion("""2.3.1""") >= LooseVersion("""2.4.0"""))
^
IndentationError: unexpected indent
```
Another problem is that `distutils.version` is undocumented and unsupported.
* Fix some basic bugs. e.g. We have an incorrect reference to `$PYDOCSTYLEBUILD`, which doesn't exist, which was causing the doc style test to silently fail with:
```
./dev/lint-python: line 193: --version: command not found
```
* Stop suppressing error output! It's hiding problems and serves no purpose here.
### Why are the changes needed?
`lint-python` is part of our CI build and is currently doing any combination of the following: silently failing; incorrectly skipping tests; incorrectly downloading libraries when a suitable library is already available.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Lots of manual testing with `set -x` enabled.
Closes#27910 from nchammas/SPARK-31153-lint-python.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@liveramp.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current migration guide of SQL is too long for most readers to find the needed info. This PR is to group the items in the migration guide of Spark SQL based on the corresponding components.
Note. This PR does not change the contents of the migration guides. Attached figure is the screenshot after the change.
### Why are the changes needed?
The current migration guide of SQL is too long for most readers to find the needed info.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27909 from gatorsmile/migrationGuideReorg.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR manually reverts changes in #25292 and then wraps java.lang.Error with `QueryExecutionException` to notify `QueryExecutionListener` to send it to `QueryExecutionListener.onFailure` which only accepts `Exception`.
The bug fix PR for 2.4 is #27904. It needs a separate PR because the touched codes were changed a lot.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid API changes and fix a bug.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Reverting an API change happening in 3.0. QueryExecutionListener APIs will be the same as 2.4.
### How was this patch tested?
The new added test.
Closes#27907 from zsxwing/SPARK-31144.
Authored-by: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark's Web UI is using an older version of Bootstrap (v. 2.3.2) for the portal pages. Bootstrap 2.x was moved to EOL in Aug 2013 and Bootstrap 3.x was moved to EOL in July 2019 (https://github.com/twbs/release). Older versions of Bootstrap are also getting flagged in security scans for various CVEs:
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BOOTSTRAP-72889https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BOOTSTRAP-173700https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:bootstrap:20180529https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:bootstrap:20160627
I haven't validated each CVE, but it would be nice to resolve any potential issues and get on a supported release.
The bad news is that there have been quite a few changes between Bootstrap 2 and Bootstrap 4. I've tried updating the library, refactoring/tweaking the CSS and JS to maintain a similar appearance and functionality, and testing the UI for functionality and appearance. This is a fairly large change so I'm sure additional testing and fixes will be needed.
### How was this patch tested?
This has been manually tested, but there is a ton of functionality and there are many pages and detail pages so it is very possible bugs introduced from the upgrade were missed. Additional testing and feedback is welcomed. If it appears a whole page was missed let me know and I'll take a pass at addressing that page/section.
Closes#27370 from clarkead/bootstrap4-core-upgrade.
Authored-by: Dale Clarke <a.dale.clarke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`StreamingQueryStatisticsPage` shows a message "No visualization information available because there is no batches" instead of showing empty timelines and histograms for empty streaming queries.
[Before this change applied]
[After this change applied]
### Why are the changes needed?
Empty charts are ugly and a little bit confusing.
It's better to clearly say "No visualization information available".
Also, this change fixes a JS error shown in the capture above.
This error occurs because `drawTimeline` in `streaming-page.js` is called even though `formattedDate` will be `undefined` for empty streaming queries.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. screen captures are shown above.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested by creating an empty streaming query like as follows.
```
val df = spark.readStream.format("socket").options(Map("host"->"<non-existing hostname>", "port"->"...")).load
df.writeStream.format("console").start
```
This streaming query will fail because of `non-existing hostname` and has no batches.
Closes#27755 from sarutak/fix-for-empty-batches.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a minor issue in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26201
In the streaming statistics page, there is such error
```
streaming-page.js:211 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'top' of undefined
at SVGCircleElement.<anonymous> (streaming-page.js:211)
at SVGCircleElement.__onclick (d3.min.js:1)
```
in the console after clicking the timeline graph.
This PR is to fix it.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix the error of javascript execution.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, the error shows up in the console.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Closes#27883 from gengliangwang/fixSelector.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we reverted the original change in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27540, this PR is to remove the corresponding migration guide made in the commit https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24948
### Why are the changes needed?
N/A
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27896 from gatorsmile/SPARK-28093Followup.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When loading DataFrames from JDBC datasource with Kerberos authentication, remote executors (yarn-client/cluster etc. modes) fail to establish a connection due to lack of Kerberos ticket or ability to generate it.
This is a real issue when trying to ingest data from kerberized data sources (SQL Server, Oracle) in enterprise environment where exposing simple authentication access is not an option due to IT policy issues.
In this PR I've added Postgres support (other supported databases will come in later PRs).
What this PR contains:
* Added `keytab` and `principal` JDBC options
* Added `ConnectionProvider` trait and it's impementations:
* `BasicConnectionProvider` => unsecure connection
* `PostgresConnectionProvider` => postgres secure connection
* Added `ConnectionProvider` tests
* Added `PostgresKrbIntegrationSuite` docker integration test
* Created `SecurityUtils` to concentrate re-usable security related functionalities
* Documentation
### Why are the changes needed?
Missing JDBC kerberos support.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, 2 additional JDBC options added:
* keytab
* principal
If both provided then Spark does kerberos authentication.
### How was this patch tested?
To demonstrate the functionality with a standalone application I've created this repository: https://github.com/gaborgsomogyi/docker-kerberos
* Additional + existing unit tests
* Additional docker integration test
* Test on cluster manually
* `SKIP_API=1 jekyll build`
Closes#27637 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-30874.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 47d6e80a2e.
### Why are the changes needed?
There is no standard requiring that `div` must return the type of the operand, and always returning long type looks fine. This is kind of a cosmetic change and we should avoid it if it breaks existing queries. This is similar to reverting TRIM function parameter order change.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, change the behavior of `div` back to be the same as 2.4.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27835 from cloud-fan/revert2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to recover `IntervalBenchmark` and `DataTimeBenchmark` due to banning intervals as output.
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR recovers the benchmark suite.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually, re-run the benchmark.
Closes#27885 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31111-2.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled should be removed from SQLConf and the migration guide
spark.sql.legacy.timeParsePolicy is the right one
### Why are the changes needed?
fix doc
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the jenkins
Closes#27889 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31131.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR (SPARK-31130) aims to pin `Commons IO` version to `2.4` in SBT build like Maven build.
### Why are the changes needed?
[HADOOP-15261](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15261) upgraded `commons-io` from 2.4 to 2.5 at Apache Hadoop 3.1.
In `Maven`, Apache Spark always uses `Commons IO 2.4` based on `pom.xml`.
```
$ git grep commons-io.version
pom.xml: <commons-io.version>2.4</commons-io.version>
pom.xml: <version>${commons-io.version}</version>
```
However, `SBT` choose `2.5`.
**branch-3.0**
```
$ build/sbt -Phadoop-3.2 "core/dependencyTree" | grep commons-io:commons-io | head -n1
[info] | | +-commons-io:commons-io:2.5
```
**branch-2.4**
```
$ build/sbt -Phadoop-3.1 "core/dependencyTree" | grep commons-io:commons-io | head -n1
[info] | | +-commons-io:commons-io:2.5
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with `[test-hadoop3.2]` (the default PR Builder is `SBT`) and manually do the following locally.
```
build/sbt -Phadoop-3.2 "core/dependencyTree" | grep commons-io:commons-io | head -n1
```
Closes#27886 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31130.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AQE has a perf regression when using the default settings: if we coalesce the shuffle partitions into one or few partitions, we may leave many CPU cores idle and the perf is worse than with AQE off (which leverages all CPU cores).
Technically, this is not a bad thing. If there are many queries running at the same time, it's better to coalesce shuffle partitions into fewer partitions. However, the default settings of AQE should try to avoid any perf regression as possible as we can.
This PR changes the default value of minPartitionNum when coalescing shuffle partitions, to be `SparkContext.defaultParallelism`, so that AQE can leverage all the CPU cores.
### Why are the changes needed?
avoid AQE perf regression
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27879 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the error message, adding an example for typed Scala UDF.
### Why are the changes needed?
Help user to know how to migrate to typed Scala UDF.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it's a new error message in Spark 3.0.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#27884 from Ngone51/spark_31010_followup.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As a common usage and according to the spark doc, users may often just copy their `hive-site.xml` to Spark directly from hive projects. Sometimes, the config file is not that clean for spark and may cause some side effects.
for example, `hive.session.history.enabled` will create a log for the hive jobs but useless for spark and also it will not be deleted on JVM exit.
this pr
1) disable `hive.session.history.enabled` explicitly to disable creating `hive_job_log` file, e.g.
```
Hive history file=/var/folders/01/h81cs4sn3dq2dd_k4j6fhrmc0000gn/T//kentyao/hive_job_log_79c63b29-95a4-4935-a9eb-2d89844dfe4f_493861201.txt
```
2) set `hive.execution.engine` to `spark` explicitly in case the config is `tez` and casue uneccesary problem like this:
```
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tez/dag/api/SessionNotRunning
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.session.SessionState.start(SessionState.java:529)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
reduce overhead of internal complexity and users' hive cognitive load for running spark
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, `hive_job_log` file will not be created even enabled, and will not try to initialize tez kinds of stuff
### How was this patch tested?
add ut and verify manually
Closes#27827 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31066.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch changes to log better message (at least relevant to decommission) when registering signal handler for SIGPWR fails. SIGPWR is non-POSIX and not all unix-like OS support it; we can easily find the case, macOS.
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark already logs message on failing to register handler for SIGPWR, but the error message is too general which doesn't give the information of the impact. End users should be noticed that failing to register handler for SIGPWR effectively "disables" the feature of decommission.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested via running standalone master/worker in macOS 10.14.6, with `spark.worker.decommission.enabled= true`, and submit an example application to run executors.
(NOTE: the message may be different a bit, as the message can be updated in review phase.)
For worker log:
```
20/03/06 17:19:13 INFO Worker: Registering SIGPWR handler to trigger decommissioning.
20/03/06 17:19:13 INFO SignalUtils: Registering signal handler for PWR
20/03/06 17:19:13 WARN SignalUtils: Failed to register SIGPWR - disabling worker decommission.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown signal: PWR
at java.base/jdk.internal.misc.Signal.<init>(Signal.java:148)
at jdk.unsupported/sun.misc.Signal.<init>(Signal.java:139)
at org.apache.spark.util.SignalUtils$.$anonfun$registerSignal$1(SignalUtils.scala:95)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.getOrElseUpdate(HashMap.scala:86)
at org.apache.spark.util.SignalUtils$.registerSignal(SignalUtils.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.util.SignalUtils$.register(SignalUtils.scala:81)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker.<init>(Worker.scala:73)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker$.startRpcEnvAndEndpoint(Worker.scala:887)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker$.main(Worker.scala:855)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker.main(Worker.scala)
```
For executor:
```
20/03/06 17:21:52 INFO CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend: Registering PWR handler.
20/03/06 17:21:52 INFO SignalUtils: Registering signal handler for PWR
20/03/06 17:21:52 WARN SignalUtils: Failed to register SIGPWR - disabling decommission feature.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown signal: PWR
at java.base/jdk.internal.misc.Signal.<init>(Signal.java:148)
at jdk.unsupported/sun.misc.Signal.<init>(Signal.java:139)
at org.apache.spark.util.SignalUtils$.$anonfun$registerSignal$1(SignalUtils.scala:95)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.getOrElseUpdate(HashMap.scala:86)
at org.apache.spark.util.SignalUtils$.registerSignal(SignalUtils.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.util.SignalUtils$.register(SignalUtils.scala:81)
at org.apache.spark.executor.CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.onStart(CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala:86)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.$anonfun$process$1(Inbox.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.safelyCall(Inbox.scala:203)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Inbox.process(Inbox.scala:100)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.MessageLoop.org$apache$spark$rpc$netty$MessageLoop$$receiveLoop(MessageLoop.scala:75)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.MessageLoop$$anon$1.run(MessageLoop.scala:41)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
```
Closes#27832 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-31011.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, compute summary and update distributions in one pass;
2, remove logic related to check `shouldDistributeGaussians`
### Why are the changes needed?
In current impl, GMM need to trigger two jobs at one iteration:
1, one to compute summary;
2, if `shouldDistributeGaussians = ((k - 1.0) / k) * numFeatures > 25.0`, trigger another to update distributions;
`shouldDistributeGaussians` is almost true in practice, since numFeatures is likely to be greater than 25.
We can use only one job to impl above computation, by following the logic in `KMeans`: using `reduceByKey` to compute statistics for each center
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites
Closes#27784 from zhengruifeng/gmm_avoid_distri_gaussian.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR (SPARK-31126) aims to upgrade Kafka library to bring a client-side bug fix like KAFKA-8933
### Why are the changes needed?
The following is the full release note.
- https://downloads.apache.org/kafka/2.4.1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the existing test.
Closes#27881 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-KAFKA-2.4.1.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.Add version information to the configuration of `Status`.
2.Update the docs of `Status`.
3.By the way supplementary documentation about https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27847
I sorted out some information show below.
Item name | Since version | JIRA ID | Commit ID | Note
-- | -- | -- | -- | --
spark.appStateStore.asyncTracking.enable | 2.3.0 | SPARK-20653 | 772e4648d95bda3353723337723543c741ea8476#diff-9ab674b7af7b2097f7d28cb6f5fd1e8c |
spark.ui.liveUpdate.period | 2.3.0 | SPARK-20644 | c7f38e5adb88d43ef60662c5d6ff4e7a95bff580#diff-9ab674b7af7b2097f7d28cb6f5fd1e8c |
spark.ui.liveUpdate.minFlushPeriod | 2.4.2 | SPARK-27394 | a8a2ba11ac10051423e58920062b50f328b06421#diff-9ab674b7af7b2097f7d28cb6f5fd1e8c |
spark.ui.retainedJobs | 1.2.0 | SPARK-2321 | 9530316887612dca060a128fca34dd5a6ab2a9a9#diff-1f32bcb61f51133bd0959a4177a066a5 |
spark.ui.retainedStages | 0.9.0 | None | 112c0a1776bbc866a1026a9579c6f72f293414c4#diff-1f32bcb61f51133bd0959a4177a066a5 | 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
spark.ui.retainedTasks | 2.0.1 | SPARK-15083 | 55db26245d69bb02b7d7d5f25029b1a1cd571644#diff-6bdad48cfc34314e89599655442ff210 |
spark.ui.retainedDeadExecutors | 2.0.0 | SPARK-7729 | 9f4263392e492b5bc0acecec2712438ff9a257b7#diff-a0ba36f9b1f9829bf3c4689b05ab6cf2 |
spark.ui.dagGraph.retainedRootRDDs | 2.1.0 | SPARK-17171 | cc87280fcd065b01667ca7a59a1a32c7ab757355#diff-3f492c527ea26679d4307041b28455b8 |
spark.metrics.appStatusSource.enabled | 3.0.0 | SPARK-30060 | 60f20e5ea2000ab8f4a593b5e4217fd5637c5e22#diff-9f796ae06b0272c1f0a012652a5b68d0 |
### Why are the changes needed?
Supplemental configuration version information.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Exists UT
Closes#27848 from beliefer/add-version-to-status-config.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A few improvements to the sql ref SELECT doc:
1. correct the syntax of SELECT query
2. correct the default of null sort order
3. correct the GROUP BY syntax
4. several minor fixes
### Why are the changes needed?
refine document
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27866 from cloud-fan/doc.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace a sleep with waiting for the first collect to happen to try and make the K8s test code more reliable.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently the Decommissioning test appears to be flaky in Jenkins.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Ran K8s test suite in a loop on minikube on my desktop for 10 iterations without this test failing on any of the runs.
Closes#27858 from holdenk/SPARK-31062-Improve-Spark-Decommissioning-K8s-test-teliability.
Authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```ChiSqSelector ``` depends on ```mllib.ChiSqSelectorModel``` to do the selection logic. Will remove the dependency in this PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR is an intermediate PR. Removing ```ChiSqSelector``` dependency on ```mllib.ChiSqSelectorModel```. Next subtask will extract the common code between ```ChiSqSelector``` and ```FValueSelector``` and put in an abstract ```Selector```.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
New and existing tests
Closes#27841 from huaxingao/chisq.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reverts https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26051 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26066
### Why are the changes needed?
There is no standard requiring that `size(null)` must return null, and returning -1 looks reasonable as well. This is kind of a cosmetic change and we should avoid it if it breaks existing queries. This is similar to reverting TRIM function parameter order change.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, change the behavior of `size(null)` back to be the same as 2.4.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27834 from cloud-fan/revert.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DateTimeUtilsSuite.daysToMicros and microsToDays` takes 30 seconds, which is too long for a UT.
This PR changes the test to check random data, to reduce testing time. Now this test takes 1 second.
### Why are the changes needed?
make test faster
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27873 from cloud-fan/test.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes `dev/make-distribution.sh` a bit easier to use by not hiding errors thrown by Maven.
As a supporting change, this PR also suppresses progress bar output from curl and wget that may be output from within `build/mvn`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's surprising for command-line options to be position-dependent. The errors that get thrown when you pass the correct option (like `--pip`) but in the wrong order are confusing.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
I ran a few invocations of `make-distribution.sh` to confirm that, when passed incorrect options, I can actually see the errors thrown directly by Maven.
Closes#27800 from nchammas/SPARK-31041-make-distribution.
Authored-by: Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas@liveramp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change conversion of java.sql.Timestamp/Date values to/from internal values of Catalyst's TimestampType/DateType before cutover day `1582-10-15` of Gregorian calendar. I propose to construct local date-time from microseconds/days since the epoch. Take each date-time component `year`, `month`, `day`, `hour`, `minute`, `second` and `second fraction`, and construct java.sql.Timestamp/Date using the extracted components.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will rebase underlying time/date offset in the way that collected java.sql.Timestamp/Date values will have the same local time-date component as the original values in Gregorian calendar.
Here is the example which demonstrates the issue:
```sql
scala> sql("select date '1100-10-10'").collect()
res1: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([1100-10-03])
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, after the changes:
```sql
scala> sql("select date '1100-10-10'").collect()
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([1100-10-10])
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite` and `DateExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#27807 from MaxGekk/rebase-timestamp-before-1582.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix the error caused by interval output in ExtractBenchmark
### Why are the changes needed?
fix a bug in the test
```scala
[info] Running case: cast to interval
[error] Exception in thread "main" org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot use interval type in the table schema.;;
[error] OverwriteByExpression RelationV2[] noop-table, true, true
[error] +- Project [(subtractdates(cast(cast(id#0L as timestamp) as date), -719162) + subtracttimestamps(cast(id#0L as timestamp), -30610249419876544)) AS ((CAST(CAST(id AS TIMESTAMP) AS DATE) - DATE '0001-01-01') + (CAST(id AS TIMESTAMP) - TIMESTAMP '1000-01-01 01:02:03.123456'))#2]
[error] +- Range (1262304000, 1272304000, step=1, splits=Some(1))
[error]
[error] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.TypeUtils$.failWithIntervalType(TypeUtils.scala:106)
[error] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis$25(CheckAnalysis.scala:389)
[error] at org.a
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
re-run benchmark
Closes#27867 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31111.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When encoding Java Beans to Spark DataFrame, respecting `javax.annotation.Nonnull` and producing non-null fields.
### Why are the changes needed?
When encoding Java Beans to Spark DataFrame, non-primitive types are encoded as nullable fields. Although It works for most cases, it can be an issue under a few situations, e.g. the one described in the JIRA ticket when saving DataFrame to Avro format with non-null field.
We should allow Spark users more flexibility when creating Spark DataFrame from Java Beans. Currently, Spark users cannot create DataFrame with non-nullable fields in the schema from beans with non-nullable properties.
Although it is possible to project top-level columns with SQL expressions like `AssertNotNull` to make it non-null, for nested fields it is more tricky to do it similarly.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After this change, Spark users can use `javax.annotation.Nonnull` to annotate non-null fields in Java Beans when encoding beans to Spark DataFrame.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Closes#27851 from viirya/SPARK-31071.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark version 2.4 and earlier, datetime parsing, formatting and conversion are performed by using the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian).
Since the Proleptic Gregorian calendar is de-facto calendar worldwide, as well as the chosen one in ANSI SQL standard, Spark 3.0 switches to it by using Java 8 API classes (the java.time packages that are based on ISO chronology ). The switching job is completed in SPARK-26651.
But after the switching, there are some patterns not compatible between Java 8 and Java 7, Spark needs its own definition on the patterns rather than depends on Java API.
In this PR, we achieve this by writing the document and shadow the incompatible letters. See more details in [SPARK-31030](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31030)
### Why are the changes needed?
For backward compatibility.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
After we define our own datetime parsing and formatting patterns, it's same to old Spark version.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing and new added UT.
Locally document test:
Closes#27830 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31030.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
<!--
Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first for naming configurations in
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
-->
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
<!--
Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
-->
There are two problems when splitting skewed partitions:
1. It's impossible that we can't split the skewed partition, then we shouldn't create a skew join.
2. When splitting, it's possible that we create a partition for very small amount of data..
This PR fixes them
1. don't create `PartialReducerPartitionSpec` if we can't split.
2. merge small partitions to the previous partition.
### Why are the changes needed?
<!--
Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
-->
make skew join split skewed partitions more evenly
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
<!--
If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
If no, write 'No'.
-->
no
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
-->
updated test
Closes#27833 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
zero323
Nicholas Chammas
yi.wu
HyukjinKwon
Huaxin Gao
Tae-kyeom, Kim
jiake
Maxim Gekk
Wenchen Fan
Gabor Somogyi
LantaoJin
beliefer
Prashant Sharma
gatorsmile
Shixiong Zhu
Dale Clarke
Kousuke Saruta
Gengliang Wang
Kent Yao
Dongjoon Hyun
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
zhengruifeng
Holden Karau
Liang-Chi Hsieh
Yuanjian Li
Qianyang Yu
