Commit graph

21503 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wang Gengliang 049f243c59 [SPARK-23490][SQL] Check storage.locationUri with existing table in CreateTable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For CreateTable with Append mode, we should check if `storage.locationUri` is the same with existing table in `PreprocessTableCreation`

In the current code, there is only a simple exception if the `storage.locationUri` is different with existing table:
`org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table or view not found:`

which can be improved.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Author: Wang Gengliang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>

Closes #20660 from gengliangwang/locationUri.
2018-02-22 21:49:25 -08:00
Gabor Somogyi c5abb3c2d1 [SPARK-23476][CORE] Generate secret in local mode when authentication on
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

If spark is run with "spark.authenticate=true", then it will fail to start in local mode.

This PR generates secret in local mode when authentication on.

## How was this patch tested?

Modified existing unit test.
Manually started spark-shell.

Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>

Closes #20652 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-23476.
2018-02-22 12:07:51 -08:00
Marco Gaido 87293c746e [SPARK-23475][UI] Show also skipped stages
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

SPARK-20648 introduced the status `SKIPPED` for the stages. On the UI, previously, skipped stages were shown as `PENDING`; after this change, they are not shown on the UI.

The PR introduce a new section in order to show also `SKIPPED` stages in a proper table.

## How was this patch tested?

manual tests

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20651 from mgaido91/SPARK-23475.
2018-02-22 11:00:12 -08:00
Shixiong Zhu 45cf714ee6 [SPARK-23475][WEBUI] Skipped stages should be evicted before completed stages
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The root cause of missing completed stages is because `cleanupStages` will never remove skipped stages.

This PR changes the logic to always remove skipped stage first. This is safe since  the job itself contains enough information to render skipped stages in the UI.

## How was this patch tested?

The new unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>

Closes #20656 from zsxwing/SPARK-23475.
2018-02-21 19:43:11 -08:00
Shixiong Zhu 744d5af652 [SPARK-23481][WEBUI] lastStageAttempt should fail when a stage doesn't exist
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The issue here is `AppStatusStore.lastStageAttempt` will return the next available stage in the store when a stage doesn't exist.

This PR adds `last(stageId)` to ensure it returns a correct `StageData`

## How was this patch tested?

The new unit test.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>

Closes #20654 from zsxwing/SPARK-23481.
2018-02-21 15:37:28 -08:00
Tathagata Das 3fd0ccb13f [SPARK-23484][SS] Fix possible race condition in KafkaContinuousReader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

var `KafkaContinuousReader.knownPartitions` should be threadsafe as it is accessed from multiple threads - the query thread at the time of reader factory creation, and the epoch tracking thread at the time of `needsReconfiguration`.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20655 from tdas/SPARK-23484.
2018-02-21 14:56:13 -08:00
Marco Gaido e836c27ce0 [SPARK-23217][ML][PYTHON] Add distanceMeasure param to ClusteringEvaluator Python API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds the `distanceMeasure` param to ClusteringEvaluator in the Python API. This allows the user to specify `cosine` as distance measure in addition to the default `squaredEuclidean`.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20627 from mgaido91/SPARK-23217_python.
2018-02-21 12:39:36 -06:00
Ryan Blue c8c4441dfd [SPARK-23418][SQL] Fail DataSourceV2 reads when user schema is passed, but not supported.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

DataSourceV2 initially allowed user-supplied schemas when a source doesn't implement `ReadSupportWithSchema`, as long as the schema was identical to the source's schema. This is confusing behavior because changes to an underlying table can cause a previously working job to fail with an exception that user-supplied schemas are not allowed.

This reverts commit adcb25a0624, which was added to #20387 so that it could be removed in a separate JIRA issue and PR.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes #20603 from rdblue/SPARK-23418-revert-adcb25a0624.
2018-02-21 15:10:08 +08:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 95e25ed1a8 [SPARK-23424][SQL] Add codegenStageId in comment
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR always adds `codegenStageId` in comment of the generated class. This is a replication of #20419  for post-Spark 2.3.
Closes #20419

```
/* 001 */ public Object generate(Object[] references) {
/* 002 */   return new GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1(references);
/* 003 */ }
/* 004 */
/* 005 */ // codegenStageId=1
/* 006 */ final class GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1 extends org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator {
/* 007 */   private Object[] references;
...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #20612 from kiszk/SPARK-23424.
2018-02-21 11:26:06 +08:00
Tathagata Das 601d653bff [SPARK-23454][SS][DOCS] Added trigger information to the Structured Streaming programming guide
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Added clear information about triggers
- Made the semantics guarantees of watermarks more clear for streaming aggregations and stream-stream joins.

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20631 from tdas/SPARK-23454.
2018-02-20 18:16:10 -08:00
Marcelo Vanzin 6d398c05cb [SPARK-23468][CORE] Stringify auth secret before storing it in credentials.
The secret is used as a string in many parts of the code, so it has
to be turned into a hex string to avoid issues such as the random
byte sequence not containing a valid UTF8 sequence.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #20643 from vanzin/SPARK-23468.
2018-02-20 18:06:21 -08:00
Marcelo Vanzin 2ba77ed9e5 [SPARK-23470][UI] Use first attempt of last stage to define job description.
This is much faster than finding out what the last attempt is, and the
data should be the same.

There's room for improvement in this page (like only loading data for
the jobs being shown, instead of loading all available jobs and sorting
them), but this should bring performance on par with the 2.2 version.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #20644 from vanzin/SPARK-23470.
2018-02-20 17:54:06 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3e48f3b9ee [SPARK-23434][SQL] Spark should not warn metadata directory for a HDFS file path
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In a kerberized cluster, when Spark reads a file path (e.g. `people.json`), it warns with a wrong warning message during looking up `people.json/_spark_metadata`. The root cause of this situation is the difference between `LocalFileSystem` and `DistributedFileSystem`. `LocalFileSystem.exists()` returns `false`, but `DistributedFileSystem.exists` raises `org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException`.

```scala
scala> spark.version
res0: String = 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT

scala> spark.read.json("file:///usr/hdp/current/spark-client/examples/src/main/resources/people.json").show
+----+-------+
| age|   name|
+----+-------+
|null|Michael|
|  30|   Andy|
|  19| Justin|
+----+-------+

scala> spark.read.json("hdfs:///tmp/people.json")
18/02/15 05:00:48 WARN streaming.FileStreamSink: Error while looking for metadata directory.
18/02/15 05:00:48 WARN streaming.FileStreamSink: Error while looking for metadata directory.
```

After this PR,
```scala
scala> spark.read.json("hdfs:///tmp/people.json").show
+----+-------+
| age|   name|
+----+-------+
|null|Michael|
|  30|   Andy|
|  19| Justin|
+----+-------+
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20616 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23434.
2018-02-20 16:02:44 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 83c008762a [SPARK-23456][SPARK-21783] Turn on native ORC impl and PPD by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Apache Spark 2.3 introduced `native` ORC supports with vectorization and many fixes. However, it's shipped as a not-default option. This PR enables `native` ORC implementation and predicate-pushdown by default for Apache Spark 2.4. We will improve and stabilize ORC data source before Apache Spark 2.4. And, eventually, Apache Spark will drop old Hive-based ORC code.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with existing tests.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20634 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23456.
2018-02-20 09:14:56 -08:00
Kent Yao 189f56f3dc [SPARK-23383][BUILD][MINOR] Make a distribution should exit with usage while detecting wrong options
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```shell
./dev/make-distribution.sh --name ne-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT xyz --tgz  -Phadoop-2.7
+++ dirname ./dev/make-distribution.sh
++ cd ./dev/..
++ pwd
+ SPARK_HOME=/Users/Kent/Documents/spark
+ DISTDIR=/Users/Kent/Documents/spark/dist
+ MAKE_TGZ=false
+ MAKE_PIP=false
+ MAKE_R=false
+ NAME=none
+ MVN=/Users/Kent/Documents/spark/build/mvn
+ ((  5  ))
+ case $1 in
+ NAME=ne-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
+ shift
+ shift
+ ((  3  ))
+ case $1 in
+ break
+ '[' -z /Users/Kent/.jenv/candidates/java/current ']'
+ '[' -z /Users/Kent/.jenv/candidates/java/current ']'
++ command -v git
+ '[' /usr/local/bin/git ']'
++ git rev-parse --short HEAD
+ GITREV=98ea6a7
+ '[' '!' -z 98ea6a7 ']'
+ GITREVSTRING=' (git revision 98ea6a7)'
+ unset GITREV
++ command -v /Users/Kent/Documents/spark/build/mvn
+ '[' '!' /Users/Kent/Documents/spark/build/mvn ']'
++ /Users/Kent/Documents/spark/build/mvn help:evaluate -Dexpression=project.version xyz --tgz -Phadoop-2.7
++ grep -v INFO
++ tail -n 1
+ VERSION=' -X,--debug                             Produce execution debug output'
```
It is better to declare the mistakes and exit with usage than `break`

## How was this patch tested?

manually

cc srowen

Author: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>

Closes #20571 from yaooqinn/SPARK-23383.
2018-02-20 07:51:30 -06:00
Bruce Robbins 862fa697d8 [SPARK-23240][PYTHON] Better error message when extraneous data in pyspark.daemon's stdout
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Print more helpful message when daemon module's stdout is empty or contains a bad port number.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually recreated the environmental issues that caused the mysterious exceptions at one site. Tested that the expected messages are logged.

Also, ran all scala unit tests.

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>

Closes #20424 from bersprockets/SPARK-23240_prop2.
2018-02-20 20:26:26 +09:00
Ryan Blue aadf9535b4 [SPARK-23203][SQL] DataSourceV2: Use immutable logical plans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

SPARK-23203: DataSourceV2 should use immutable catalyst trees instead of wrapping a mutable DataSourceV2Reader. This commit updates DataSourceV2Relation and consolidates much of the DataSourceV2 API requirements for the read path in it. Instead of wrapping a reader that changes, the relation lazily produces a reader from its configuration.

This commit also updates the predicate and projection push-down. Instead of the implementation from SPARK-22197, this reuses the rule matching from the Hive and DataSource read paths (using `PhysicalOperation`) and copies most of the implementation of `SparkPlanner.pruneFilterProject`, with updates for DataSourceV2. By reusing the implementation from other read paths, this should have fewer regressions from other read paths and is less code to maintain.

The new push-down rules also supports the following edge cases:

* The output of DataSourceV2Relation should be what is returned by the reader, in case the reader can only partially satisfy the requested schema projection
* The requested projection passed to the DataSourceV2Reader should include filter columns
* The push-down rule may be run more than once if filters are not pushed through projections

## How was this patch tested?

Existing push-down and read tests.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes #20387 from rdblue/SPARK-22386-push-down-immutable-trees.
2018-02-20 16:04:22 +08:00
Marco Gaido 651b0277fe [SPARK-23436][SQL] Infer partition as Date only if it can be casted to Date
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Before the patch, Spark could infer as Date a partition value which cannot be casted to Date (this can happen when there are extra characters after a valid date, like `2018-02-15AAA`).

When this happens and the input format has metadata which define the schema of the table, then `null` is returned as a value for the partition column, because the `cast` operator used in (`PartitioningAwareFileIndex.inferPartitioning`) is unable to convert the value.

The PR checks in the partition inference that values can be casted to Date and Timestamp, in order to infer that datatype to them.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20621 from mgaido91/SPARK-23436.
2018-02-20 13:56:38 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun f5850e7892 [SPARK-23457][SQL] Register task completion listeners first in ParquetFileFormat
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

ParquetFileFormat leaks opened files in some cases. This PR prevents that by registering task completion listers first before initialization.

- [spark-branch-2.3-test-sbt-hadoop-2.7](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-branch-2.3-test-sbt-hadoop-2.7/205/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql/FileBasedDataSourceSuite/_It_is_not_a_test_it_is_a_sbt_testing_SuiteSelector_/)
- [spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.6](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.6/4228/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet/ParquetQuerySuite/_It_is_not_a_test_it_is_a_sbt_testing_SuiteSelector_/)

```
Caused by: sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.lang.Throwable: null
	at org.apache.spark.DebugFilesystem$.addOpenStream(DebugFilesystem.scala:36)
	at org.apache.spark.DebugFilesystem.open(DebugFilesystem.scala:70)
	at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:769)
	at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetFileReader.<init>(ParquetFileReader.java:538)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.initialize(SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:149)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.VectorizedParquetRecordReader.initialize(VectorizedParquetRecordReader.java:133)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetFileFormat$$anonfun$buildReaderWithPartitionValues$1.apply(ParquetFileFormat.scala:400)
	at
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual. The following test case generates the same leakage.

```scala
  test("SPARK-23457 Register task completion listeners first in ParquetFileFormat") {
    withSQLConf(SQLConf.PARQUET_VECTORIZED_READER_BATCH_SIZE.key -> s"${Int.MaxValue}") {
      withTempDir { dir =>
        val basePath = dir.getCanonicalPath
        Seq(0).toDF("a").write.format("parquet").save(new Path(basePath, "first").toString)
        Seq(1).toDF("a").write.format("parquet").save(new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val df = spark.read.parquet(
          new Path(basePath, "first").toString,
          new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val e = intercept[SparkException] {
          df.collect()
        }
        assert(e.getCause.isInstanceOf[OutOfMemoryError])
      }
    }
  }
```

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20619 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23390.
2018-02-20 13:33:03 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3ee3b2ae1f [SPARK-23340][SQL] Upgrade Apache ORC to 1.4.3
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR updates Apache ORC dependencies to 1.4.3 released on February 9th. Apache ORC 1.4.2 release removes unnecessary dependencies and 1.4.3 has 5 more patches (https://s.apache.org/Fll8).

Especially, the following ORC-285 is fixed at 1.4.3.

```scala
scala> val df = Seq(Array.empty[Float]).toDF()

scala> df.write.format("orc").save("/tmp/floatarray")

scala> spark.read.orc("/tmp/floatarray")
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [value: array<float>]

scala> spark.read.orc("/tmp/floatarray").show()
18/02/12 22:09:10 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 1.0 (TID 1)
java.io.IOException: Error reading file: file:/tmp/floatarray/part-00000-9c0b461b-4df1-4c23-aac1-3e4f349ac7d6-c000.snappy.orc
	at org.apache.orc.impl.RecordReaderImpl.nextBatch(RecordReaderImpl.java:1191)
	at org.apache.orc.mapreduce.OrcMapreduceRecordReader.ensureBatch(OrcMapreduceRecordReader.java:78)
...
Caused by: java.io.EOFException: Read past EOF for compressed stream Stream for column 2 kind DATA position: 0 length: 0 range: 0 offset: 0 limit: 0
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins test.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20511 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23340.
2018-02-17 00:25:36 -08:00
Kris Mok 15ad4a7f10 [SPARK-23447][SQL] Cleanup codegen template for Literal
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Cleaned up the codegen templates for `Literal`s, to make sure that the `ExprCode` returned from `Literal.doGenCode()` has:
1. an empty `code` field;
2. an `isNull` field of either literal `true` or `false`;
3. a `value` field that is just a simple literal/constant.

Before this PR, there are a couple of paths that would return a non-trivial `code` and all of them are actually unnecessary. The `NaN` and `Infinity` constants for `double` and `float` can be accessed through constants directly available so there's no need to add a reference for them.

Also took the opportunity to add a new util method for ease of creating `ExprCode` for inline-able non-null values.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>

Closes #20626 from rednaxelafx/codegen-literal.
2018-02-17 10:54:14 +08:00
Shintaro Murakami d5ed2108d3 [SPARK-23381][CORE] Murmur3 hash generates a different value from other implementations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Murmur3 hash generates a different value from the original and other implementations (like Scala standard library and Guava or so) when the length of a bytes array is not multiple of 4.

## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test.

**Note: When we merge this PR, please give all the credits to Shintaro Murakami.**

Author: Shintaro Murakami <mrkm4ntrgmail.com>

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: Shintaro Murakami <mrkm4ntr@gmail.com>

Closes #20630 from gatorsmile/pr-20568.
2018-02-16 17:17:55 -08:00
Tathagata Das 0a73aa31f4 [SPARK-23362][SS] Migrate Kafka Microbatch source to v2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Migrating KafkaSource (with data source v1) to KafkaMicroBatchReader (with data source v2).

Performance comparison:
In a unit test with in-process Kafka broker, I tested the read throughput of V1 and V2 using 20M records in a single partition. They were comparable.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, few modified to be better tests than the existing ones.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20554 from tdas/SPARK-23362.
2018-02-16 14:30:19 -08:00
hyukjinkwon c5857e496f [SPARK-23446][PYTHON] Explicitly check supported types in toPandas
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR explicitly specifies and checks the types we supported in `toPandas`. This was a hole. For example, we haven't finished the binary type support in Python side yet but now it allows as below:

```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", "false")
df = spark.createDataFrame([[bytearray("a")]])
df.toPandas()
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", "true")
df.toPandas()
```

```
     _1
0  [97]
  _1
0  a
```

This should be disallowed. I think the same things also apply to nested timestamps too.

I also added some nicer message about `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled` in the error message.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested and tests added in `python/pyspark/sql/tests.py`.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20625 from HyukjinKwon/pandas_convertion_supported_type.
2018-02-16 09:41:17 -08:00
“attilapiros” 1dc2c1d5e8 [SPARK-23413][UI] Fix sorting tasks by Host / Executor ID at the Stage page
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fixing exception got at sorting tasks by Host / Executor ID:
```
        java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid sort column: Host
	at org.apache.spark.ui.jobs.ApiHelper$.indexName(StagePage.scala:1017)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.jobs.TaskDataSource.sliceData(StagePage.scala:694)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.PagedDataSource.pageData(PagedTable.scala:61)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.PagedTable$class.table(PagedTable.scala:96)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.jobs.TaskPagedTable.table(StagePage.scala:708)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.jobs.StagePage.liftedTree1$1(StagePage.scala:293)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.jobs.StagePage.render(StagePage.scala:282)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.WebUI$$anonfun$2.apply(WebUI.scala:82)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.WebUI$$anonfun$2.apply(WebUI.scala:82)
	at org.apache.spark.ui.JettyUtils$$anon$3.doGet(JettyUtils.scala:90)
	at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:687)
	at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)
	at org.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:848)
	at org.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:584)
```

Moreover some refactoring to avoid similar problems by introducing constants for each header name and reusing them at the identification of the corresponding sorting index.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually:

![screen shot 2018-02-13 at 18 57 10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2017933/36166532-1cfdf3b8-10f3-11e8-8d32-5fcaad2af214.png)

Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>

Closes #20601 from attilapiros/SPARK-23413.
2018-02-15 13:51:24 -06:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh db45daab90 [SPARK-23377][ML] Fixes Bucketizer with multiple columns persistence bug
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

#### Problem:

Since 2.3, `Bucketizer` supports multiple input/output columns. We will check if exclusive params are set during transformation. E.g., if `inputCols` and `outputCol` are both set, an error will be thrown.

However, when we write `Bucketizer`, looks like the default params and user-supplied params are merged during writing. All saved params are loaded back and set to created model instance. So the default `outputCol` param in `HasOutputCol` trait will be set in `paramMap` and become an user-supplied param. That makes the check of exclusive params failed.

#### Fix:

This changes the saving logic of Bucketizer to handle this case. This is a quick fix to catch the time of 2.3. We should consider modify the persistence mechanism later.

Please see the discussion in the JIRA.

Note: The multi-column `QuantileDiscretizer` also has the same issue.

## How was this patch tested?

Modified tests.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #20594 from viirya/SPARK-23377-2.
2018-02-15 09:54:39 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 6968c3cfd7 [MINOR][SQL] Fix an error message about inserting into bucketed tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This replaces `Sparkcurrently` to `Spark currently` in the following error message.

```scala
scala> sql("insert into t2 select * from v1")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Output Hive table `default`.`t2`
is bucketed but Sparkcurrently does NOT populate bucketed ...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20617 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ERROR-MSG.
2018-02-15 09:40:08 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 2f0498d1e8 [SPARK-23426][SQL] Use hive ORC impl and disable PPD for Spark 2.3.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To prevent any regressions, this PR changes ORC implementation to `hive` by default like Spark 2.2.X.
Users can enable `native` ORC. Also, ORC PPD is also restored to `false` like Spark 2.2.X.

![orc_section](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9700541/36221575-57a1d702-1173-11e8-89fe-dca5842f4ca7.png)

## How was this patch tested?

Pass all test cases.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20610 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ORC-DISABLE.
2018-02-15 08:55:39 -08:00
Marcelo Vanzin f217d7d9b2 [INFRA] Close stale PRs.
Closes #20587
Closes #20586
2018-02-15 07:47:40 -08:00
Gabor Somogyi 44e20c4225 [SPARK-23422][CORE] YarnShuffleIntegrationSuite fix when SPARK_PREPEN…
…D_CLASSES set to 1

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

YarnShuffleIntegrationSuite fails when SPARK_PREPEND_CLASSES set to 1.

Normally mllib built before yarn module. When SPARK_PREPEND_CLASSES used mllib classes are on yarn test classpath.

Before 2.3 that did not cause issues. But 2.3 has SPARK-22450, which registered some mllib classes with the kryo serializer. Now it dies with the following error:

`
18/02/13 07:33:29 INFO SparkContext: Starting job: collect at YarnShuffleIntegrationSuite.scala:143
Exception in thread "dag-scheduler-event-loop" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: breeze/linalg/DenseMatrix
`

In this PR NoClassDefFoundError caught only in case of testing and then do nothing.

## How was this patch tested?

Automated: Pass the Jenkins.

Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>

Closes #20608 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-23422.
2018-02-15 03:52:40 -08:00
hyukjinkwon ed86476098 [SPARK-23359][SQL] Adds an alias 'names' of 'fieldNames' in Scala's StructType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to add an alias 'names' of  'fieldNames' in Scala. Please see the discussion in [SPARK-20090](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20090).

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests added in `DataTypeSuite.scala`.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #20545 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23359.
2018-02-15 17:13:05 +08:00
Juliusz Sompolski 7539ae59d6 [SPARK-23366] Improve hot reading path in ReadAheadInputStream
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`ReadAheadInputStream` was introduced in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18317/ to optimize reading spill files from disk.
However, from the profiles it seems that the hot path of reading small amounts of data (like readInt) is inefficient - it involves taking locks, and multiple checks.

Optimize locking: Lock is not needed when simply accessing the active buffer. Only lock when needing to swap buffers or trigger async reading, or get information about the async state.

Optimize short-path single byte reads, that are used e.g. by Java library DataInputStream.readInt.

The asyncReader used to call "read" only once on the underlying stream, that never filled the underlying buffer when it was wrapping an LZ4BlockInputStream. If the buffer was returned unfilled, that would trigger the async reader to be triggered to fill the read ahead buffer on each call, because the reader would see that the active buffer is below the refill threshold all the time.

However, filling the full buffer all the time could introduce increased latency, so also add an `AtomicBoolean` flag for the async reader to return earlier if there is a reader waiting for data.

Remove `readAheadThresholdInBytes` and instead immediately trigger async read when switching the buffers. It allows to simplify code paths, especially the hot one that then only has to check if there is available data in the active buffer, without worrying if it needs to retrigger async read. It seems to have positive effect on perf.

## How was this patch tested?

It was noticed as a regression in some workloads after upgrading to Spark 2.3. 

It was particularly visible on TPCDS Q95 running on instances with fast disk (i3 AWS instances).
Running with profiling:
* Spark 2.2 - 5.2-5.3 minutes 9.5% in LZ4BlockInputStream.read
* Spark 2.3 - 6.4-6.6 minutes 31.1% in ReadAheadInputStream.read
* Spark 2.3 + fix - 5.3-5.4 minutes 13.3% in ReadAheadInputStream.read - very slightly slower, practically within noise.

We didn't see other regressions, and many workloads in general seem to be faster with Spark 2.3 (not investigated if thanks to async readed, or unrelated).

Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>

Closes #20555 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-23366.
2018-02-15 17:09:06 +08:00
Wenchen Fan f38c760638 [SPARK-23419][SPARK-23416][SS] data source v2 write path should re-throw interruption exceptions directly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Streaming execution has a list of exceptions that means interruption, and handle them specially. `WriteToDataSourceV2Exec` should also respect this list and not wrap them with `SparkException`.

## How was this patch tested?

existing test.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #20605 from cloud-fan/write.
2018-02-15 16:59:44 +08:00
gatorsmile 95e4b49160 [SPARK-23094] Revert [] Fix invalid character handling in JsonDataSource
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to revert the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20302, because it causes a regression.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20614 from gatorsmile/revertJsonFix.
2018-02-14 23:56:02 -08:00
gatorsmile a77ebb0921 [SPARK-23421][SPARK-22356][SQL] Document the behavior change in
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19579 introduces a behavior change. We need to document it in the migration guide.

## How was this patch tested?
Also update the HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite to verify it.

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20606 from gatorsmile/addMigrationGuide.
2018-02-14 23:52:59 -08:00
Tathagata Das 658d9d9d78 [SPARK-23406][SS] Enable stream-stream self-joins
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Solved two bugs to enable stream-stream self joins.

### Incorrect analysis due to missing MultiInstanceRelation trait
Streaming leaf nodes did not extend MultiInstanceRelation, which is necessary for the catalyst analyzer to convert the self-join logical plan DAG into a tree (by creating new instances of the leaf relations). This was causing the error `Failure when resolving conflicting references in Join:` (see JIRA for details).

### Incorrect attribute rewrite when splicing batch plans in MicroBatchExecution
When splicing the source's batch plan into the streaming plan (by replacing the StreamingExecutionPlan), we were rewriting the attribute reference in the streaming plan with the new attribute references from the batch plan. This was incorrectly handling the scenario when multiple StreamingExecutionRelation point to the same source, and therefore eventually point to the same batch plan returned by the source. Here is an example query, and its corresponding plan transformations.
```
val df = input.toDF
val join =
      df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value).join(
        df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value), "key")
```
Streaming logical plan before splicing the batch plan
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12  // two different leaves pointing to same source
```
Batch logical plan after splicing the batch plan and before rewriting
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12
```
Batch logical plan after rewriting the attributes. Specifically, for spliced, the new output attributes (value#66) replace the earlier output attributes (value#12, and value#1, one for each StreamingExecutionRelation).
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]       // both value#1 and value#12 replaces by value#66
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9, value#66]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```
This causes the optimizer to eliminate value#66 from one side of the join.
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9]   // this does not generate value, incorrect join results
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

**Solution**: Instead of rewriting attributes, use a Project to introduce aliases between the output attribute references and the new reference generated by the spliced plans. The analyzer and optimizer will take care of the rest.
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- Project [value#66 AS value#1]   // solution: project with aliases
   :     +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- Project [value#66 AS value#12]    // solution: project with aliases
         +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

## How was this patch tested?
New unit test

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #20598 from tdas/SPARK-23406.
2018-02-14 14:27:02 -08:00
gatorsmile 400a1d9e25 Revert "[SPARK-23249][SQL] Improved block merging logic for partitions"
This reverts commit 8c21170dec.
2018-02-14 10:57:12 -08:00
“attilapiros” 140f87533a [SPARK-23394][UI] In RDD storage page show the executor addresses instead of the IDs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Extending RDD storage page to show executor addresses in the block table.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually:

![screen shot 2018-02-13 at 10 30 59](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2017933/36142668-0b3578f8-10a9-11e8-95ea-2f57703ee4af.png)

Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>

Closes #20589 from attilapiros/SPARK-23394.
2018-02-14 06:45:54 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 357babde5a [SPARK-23399][SQL] Register a task completion listener first for OrcColumnarBatchReader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to resolve an open file leakage issue reported at [SPARK-23390](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23390) by moving the listener registration position. Currently, the sequence is like the following.

1. Create `batchReader`
2. `batchReader.initialize` opens a ORC file.
3. `batchReader.initBatch` may take a long time to alloc memory in some environment and cause errors.
4. `Option(TaskContext.get()).foreach(_.addTaskCompletionListener(_ => iter.close()))`

This PR moves 4 before 2 and 3. To sum up, the new sequence is 1 -> 4 -> 2 -> 3.

## How was this patch tested?

Manual. The following test case makes OOM intentionally to cause leaked filesystem connection in the current code base. With this patch, leakage doesn't occurs.

```scala
  // This should be tested manually because it raises OOM intentionally
  // in order to cause `Leaked filesystem connection`.
  test("SPARK-23399 Register a task completion listener first for OrcColumnarBatchReader") {
    withSQLConf(SQLConf.ORC_VECTORIZED_READER_BATCH_SIZE.key -> s"${Int.MaxValue}") {
      withTempDir { dir =>
        val basePath = dir.getCanonicalPath
        Seq(0).toDF("a").write.format("orc").save(new Path(basePath, "first").toString)
        Seq(1).toDF("a").write.format("orc").save(new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val df = spark.read.orc(
          new Path(basePath, "first").toString,
          new Path(basePath, "second").toString)
        val e = intercept[SparkException] {
          df.collect()
        }
        assert(e.getCause.isInstanceOf[OutOfMemoryError])
      }
    }
  }
```

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #20590 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23399.
2018-02-14 10:55:24 +08:00
gatorsmile d6f5e172b4 Revert "[SPARK-23303][SQL] improve the explain result for data source v2 relations"
This reverts commit f17b936f0d.
2018-02-13 16:21:17 -08:00
“attilapiros” a5a4b83501 [SPARK-23235][CORE] Add executor Threaddump to api
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Extending api with the executor thread dump data.

For this new REST URL is introduced:
- GET http://localhost:4040/api/v1/applications/{applicationId}/executors/{executorId}/threads

<details>
<summary>Example response:</summary>

``` javascript
[ {
  "threadId" : 52,
  "threadName" : "context-cleaner-periodic-gc",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1385411893})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 48,
  "threadName" : "dag-scheduler-event-loop",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingDeque.takeFirst(LinkedBlockingDeque.java:492)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingDeque.take(LinkedBlockingDeque.java:680)\norg.apache.spark.util.EventLoop$$anon$1.run(EventLoop.scala:46)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1138053349})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 17,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-0",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker832743930})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 18,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-1",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker834153999})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 19,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-2",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker664836465})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 20,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-3",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1645557354})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 21,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-4",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1188871851})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 22,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-5",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker920926249})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 23,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-6",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker355222677})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 24,
  "threadName" : "dispatcher-event-loop-7",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher$MessageLoop.run(Dispatcher.scala:215)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1764626380})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1589745212})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 49,
  "threadName" : "driver-heartbeater",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1602885835})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 53,
  "threadName" : "element-tracking-store-worker",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1439439099})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 3,
  "threadName" : "Finalizer",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\njava.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:143)\njava.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:164)\njava.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:209)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock1213098236})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 15,
  "threadName" : "ForkJoinPool-1-worker-13",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\nscala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:2075)\nscala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)\nscala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool380286413})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 45,
  "threadName" : "heartbeat-receiver-event-loop-thread",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject715135812})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 1,
  "threadName" : "main",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "java.io.FileInputStream.read0(Native Method)\njava.io.FileInputStream.read(FileInputStream.java:207)\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream.read(NonBlockingInputStream.java:169) => holding Monitor(scala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream46248392})\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream.read(NonBlockingInputStream.java:137)\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream.read(NonBlockingInputStream.java:246)\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:261) => holding Monitor(scala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream46248392})\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:198) => holding Monitor(scala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream46248392})\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.console.ConsoleReader.readCharacter(ConsoleReader.java:2145)\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.console.ConsoleReader.readLine(ConsoleReader.java:2349)\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.console.ConsoleReader.readLine(ConsoleReader.java:2269)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.jline_embedded.InteractiveReader.readOneLine(JLineReader.scala:57)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.InteractiveReader$$anonfun$readLine$2.apply(InteractiveReader.scala:37)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.InteractiveReader$$anonfun$readLine$2.apply(InteractiveReader.scala:37)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.InteractiveReader$.restartSysCalls(InteractiveReader.scala:44)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.InteractiveReader$class.readLine(InteractiveReader.scala:37)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.jline_embedded.InteractiveReader.readLine(JLineReader.scala:28)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.ILoop.readOneLine(ILoop.scala:404)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.ILoop.loop(ILoop.scala:413)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.ILoop$$anonfun$process$1.apply$mcZ$sp(ILoop.scala:923)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.ILoop$$anonfun$process$1.apply(ILoop.scala:909)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.ILoop$$anonfun$process$1.apply(ILoop.scala:909)\nscala.reflect.internal.util.ScalaClassLoader$.savingContextLoader(ScalaClassLoader.scala:97)\nscala.tools.nsc.interpreter.ILoop.process(ILoop.scala:909)\norg.apache.spark.repl.Main$.doMain(Main.scala:76)\norg.apache.spark.repl.Main$.main(Main.scala:56)\norg.apache.spark.repl.Main.main(Main.scala)\nsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\nsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)\nsun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)\njava.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)\norg.apache.spark.deploy.JavaMainApplication.start(SparkApplication.scala:52)\norg.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.org$apache$spark$deploy$SparkSubmit$$runMain(SparkSubmit.scala:879)\norg.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.doRunMain$1(SparkSubmit.scala:197)\norg.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.submit(SparkSubmit.scala:227)\norg.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.main(SparkSubmit.scala:136)\norg.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit.main(SparkSubmit.scala)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(scala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream46248392})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 26,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-0",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1791280119})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 27,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-1",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1947378744})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 28,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-2",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker507507251})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 29,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-3",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1016408627})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 30,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-4",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1879219501})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 31,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-5",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker290509937})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 32,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-6",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1889468930})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 33,
  "threadName" : "map-output-dispatcher-7",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.MapOutputTrackerMaster$MessageLoop.run(MapOutputTracker.scala:384)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject350285679})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Lock(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker1699637904})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 47,
  "threadName" : "netty-rpc-env-timeout",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject977194847})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 14,
  "threadName" : "NonBlockingInputStreamThread",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\nscala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream.run(NonBlockingInputStream.java:278)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByThreadId" : 1,
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(scala.tools.jline_embedded.internal.NonBlockingInputStream46248392})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 2,
  "threadName" : "Reference Handler",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\njava.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502)\njava.lang.ref.Reference.tryHandlePending(Reference.java:191)\njava.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:153)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock1359433302})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 35,
  "threadName" : "refresh progress",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\njava.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:552)\njava.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.TaskQueue44276328})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 34,
  "threadName" : "RemoteBlock-temp-file-clean-thread",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\njava.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:143)\norg.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager$RemoteBlockTempFileManager.org$apache$spark$storage$BlockManager$RemoteBlockTempFileManager$$keepCleaning(BlockManager.scala:1630)\norg.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager$RemoteBlockTempFileManager$$anon$1.run(BlockManager.scala:1608)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock391748181})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 25,
  "threadName" : "rpc-server-3-1",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl.doSelect(KQueueSelectorImpl.java:117)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) => holding Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl2057702496})\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)\nio.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.select(SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.java:62)\nio.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.select(NioEventLoop.java:753)\nio.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:409)\nio.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$5.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:858)\nio.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultThreadFactory$DefaultRunnableDecorator.run(DefaultThreadFactory.java:138)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySet1066929256})", "Monitor(java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet561426729})", "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl2057702496})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 50,
  "threadName" : "shuffle-server-5-1",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl.doSelect(KQueueSelectorImpl.java:117)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) => holding Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl1401522546})\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)\nio.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.select(SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.java:62)\nio.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.select(NioEventLoop.java:753)\nio.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:409)\nio.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$5.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:858)\nio.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultThreadFactory$DefaultRunnableDecorator.run(DefaultThreadFactory.java:138)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySet385972319})", "Monitor(java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet477937109})", "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl1401522546})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 4,
  "threadName" : "Signal Dispatcher",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 51,
  "threadName" : "Spark Context Cleaner",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\njava.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:143)\norg.apache.spark.ContextCleaner$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$ContextCleaner$$keepCleaning$1.apply$mcV$sp(ContextCleaner.scala:181)\norg.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryOrStopSparkContext(Utils.scala:1319)\norg.apache.spark.ContextCleaner.org$apache$spark$ContextCleaner$$keepCleaning(ContextCleaner.scala:178)\norg.apache.spark.ContextCleaner$$anon$1.run(ContextCleaner.scala:73)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock1739420764})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 16,
  "threadName" : "spark-listener-group-appStatus",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$scheduler$AsyncEventQueue$$dispatch$1.apply(AsyncEventQueue.scala:94)\nscala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:58)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue.org$apache$spark$scheduler$AsyncEventQueue$$dispatch(AsyncEventQueue.scala:83)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anon$1$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(AsyncEventQueue.scala:79)\norg.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryOrStopSparkContext(Utils.scala:1319)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anon$1.run(AsyncEventQueue.scala:78)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1287190987})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 44,
  "threadName" : "spark-listener-group-executorManagement",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$scheduler$AsyncEventQueue$$dispatch$1.apply(AsyncEventQueue.scala:94)\nscala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:58)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue.org$apache$spark$scheduler$AsyncEventQueue$$dispatch(AsyncEventQueue.scala:83)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anon$1$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(AsyncEventQueue.scala:79)\norg.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryOrStopSparkContext(Utils.scala:1319)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anon$1.run(AsyncEventQueue.scala:78)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject943262890})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 54,
  "threadName" : "spark-listener-group-shared",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$scheduler$AsyncEventQueue$$dispatch$1.apply(AsyncEventQueue.scala:94)\nscala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:58)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue.org$apache$spark$scheduler$AsyncEventQueue$$dispatch(AsyncEventQueue.scala:83)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anon$1$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(AsyncEventQueue.scala:79)\norg.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryOrStopSparkContext(Utils.scala:1319)\norg.apache.spark.scheduler.AsyncEventQueue$$anon$1.run(AsyncEventQueue.scala:78)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject334604425})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 37,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-37",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue.poll(BlockingArrayQueue.java:392)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.idleJobPoll(QueuedThreadPool.java:563)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.access$800(QueuedThreadPool.java:48)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:626)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1503479572})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 38,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-38",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl.doSelect(KQueueSelectorImpl.java:117)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) => holding Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl841741934})\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.select(ManagedSelector.java:243)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.produce(ManagedSelector.java:191)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:249)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.Util$3873523986})", "Monitor(java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet1769333189})", "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl841741934})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 40,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-40-acceptor-034929380-Spark3a557b62{HTTP/1.1,[http/1.1]}{0.0.0.0:4040}",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:422)\nsun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:250) => holding Monitor(java.lang.Object1134240909})\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.ServerConnector.accept(ServerConnector.java:371)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.java:601)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(java.lang.Object1134240909})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 43,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-43",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.management.ThreadImpl.dumpThreads0(Native Method)\nsun.management.ThreadImpl.dumpAllThreads(ThreadImpl.java:454)\norg.apache.spark.util.Utils$.getThreadDump(Utils.scala:2170)\norg.apache.spark.SparkContext.getExecutorThreadDump(SparkContext.scala:596)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.AbstractApplicationResource$$anonfun$threadDump$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(OneApplicationResource.scala:66)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.AbstractApplicationResource$$anonfun$threadDump$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(OneApplicationResource.scala:65)\nscala.Option.flatMap(Option.scala:171)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.AbstractApplicationResource$$anonfun$threadDump$1.apply(OneApplicationResource.scala:65)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.AbstractApplicationResource$$anonfun$threadDump$1.apply(OneApplicationResource.scala:58)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.BaseAppResource$$anonfun$withUI$1.apply(ApiRootResource.scala:139)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.BaseAppResource$$anonfun$withUI$1.apply(ApiRootResource.scala:134)\norg.apache.spark.ui.SparkUI.withSparkUI(SparkUI.scala:106)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.BaseAppResource$class.withUI(ApiRootResource.scala:134)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.AbstractApplicationResource.withUI(OneApplicationResource.scala:32)\norg.apache.spark.status.api.v1.AbstractApplicationResource.threadDump(OneApplicationResource.scala:58)\nsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\nsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)\nsun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)\njava.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.ResourceMethodInvocationHandlerFactory$1.invoke(ResourceMethodInvocationHandlerFactory.java:81)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher$1.run(AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.java:144)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.invoke(AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.java:161)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.JavaResourceMethodDispatcherProvider$TypeOutInvoker.doDispatch(JavaResourceMethodDispatcherProvider.java:205)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.dispatch(AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.java:99)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.ResourceMethodInvoker.invoke(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:389)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.ResourceMethodInvoker.apply(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:347)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.model.ResourceMethodInvoker.apply(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:102)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$2.run(ServerRuntime.java:326)\norg.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call(Errors.java:271)\norg.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call(Errors.java:267)\norg.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:315)\norg.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:297)\norg.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:267)\norg.glassfish.jersey.process.internal.RequestScope.runInScope(RequestScope.java:317)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime.process(ServerRuntime.java:305)\norg.glassfish.jersey.server.ApplicationHandler.handle(ApplicationHandler.java:1154)\norg.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.serviceImpl(WebComponent.java:473)\norg.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.service(WebComponent.java:427)\norg.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(ServletContainer.java:388)\norg.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(ServletContainer.java:341)\norg.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(ServletContainer.java:228)\norg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:848)\norg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:584)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180)\norg.spark_project.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:512)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.gzip.GzipHandler.handle(GzipHandler.java:493)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:213)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:534)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:320)\norg.spark_project.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:283)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:108)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 67,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-67",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl.doSelect(KQueueSelectorImpl.java:117)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) => holding Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl1837806480})\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.select(ManagedSelector.java:243)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.produce(ManagedSelector.java:191)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:249)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.Util$3881415814})", "Monitor(java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet62050480})", "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl1837806480})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 68,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-68",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl.doSelect(KQueueSelectorImpl.java:117)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) => holding Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl223607814})\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.select(ManagedSelector.java:243)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.produce(ManagedSelector.java:191)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:249)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.Util$3543145185})", "Monitor(java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet897441546})", "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl223607814})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 71,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-71",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue.poll(BlockingArrayQueue.java:392)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.idleJobPoll(QueuedThreadPool.java:563)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.access$800(QueuedThreadPool.java:48)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:626)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1503479572})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 77,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-77",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue.poll(BlockingArrayQueue.java:392)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.idleJobPoll(QueuedThreadPool.java:563)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.access$800(QueuedThreadPool.java:48)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:626)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1503479572})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 78,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-78",
  "threadState" : "RUNNABLE",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.kevent0(Native Method)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueArrayWrapper.poll(KQueueArrayWrapper.java:198)\nsun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl.doSelect(KQueueSelectorImpl.java:117)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) => holding Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl403077801})\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97)\nsun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.select(ManagedSelector.java:243)\norg.spark_project.jetty.io.ManagedSelector$SelectorProducer.produce(ManagedSelector.java:191)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:249)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\norg.spark_project.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "",
  "holdingLocks" : [ "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.Util$3261312406})", "Monitor(java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet852901260})", "Monitor(sun.nio.ch.KQueueSelectorImpl403077801})" ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 72,
  "threadName" : "SparkUI-JettyScheduler",
  "threadState" : "TIMED_WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)\njava.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject1587346642})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 63,
  "threadName" : "task-result-getter-0",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject537563105})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 64,
  "threadName" : "task-result-getter-1",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject537563105})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 65,
  "threadName" : "task-result-getter-2",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject537563105})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 66,
  "threadName" : "task-result-getter-3",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)\njava.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)\njava.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)\njava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject537563105})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
}, {
  "threadId" : 46,
  "threadName" : "Timer-0",
  "threadState" : "WAITING",
  "stackTrace" : "java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)\njava.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502)\njava.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:526)\njava.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505)",
  "blockedByLock" : "Lock(java.util.TaskQueue635634547})",
  "holdingLocks" : [ ]
} ]
```
</details>

## How was this patch tested?

It was tested manually.

Old executor page with thread dumps:

<img width="1632" alt="screen shot 2018-02-01 at 14 31 19" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2017933/35682124-e2ec5d96-075f-11e8-9713-a502e12d05c2.png">

New api:

<img width="1669" alt="screen shot 2018-02-01 at 14 31 56" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2017933/35682149-f75b80d6-075f-11e8-95b0-c75d048f0b04.png">

Testing error cases.

Initial state:

![screen shot 2018-02-06 at 13 05 05](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2017933/35858990-ad2982be-0b3e-11e8-879b-656112065c7f.png)

Dead executor:

```bash
$ curl -o - -s -w "\n%{http_code}\n"   http://localhost:4040/api/v1/applications/app-20180206122543-0000/executors/1/threads

Executor is not active.
400
```

Never existed (but well formatted: number) executor ID:

```bash
$ curl -o - -s -w "\n%{http_code}\n"   http://localhost:4040/api/v1/applications/app-20180206122543-0000/executors/42/threads

Executor does not exist.
404
```

Not available stacktrace (dead executor but UI has not registered as dead yet):
```bash
$ kill -9 <PID of CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend for executor 2> ;  curl -o - -s -w "\n%{http_code}\n"   http://localhost:4040/api/v1/applications/app-20180206122543-0000/executors/2/threads

No thread dump is available.
404
```

Invalid executor ID format:

```bash
$ curl -o - -s -w "\n%{http_code}\n"   http://localhost:4040/api/v1/applications/app-20180206122543-0000/executors/something6/threads

Invalid executorId: neither 'driver' nor number.
400
```

Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>

Closes #20474 from attilapiros/SPARK-23235.
2018-02-13 16:46:43 -06:00
gatorsmile 2ee76c22b6 [SPARK-23400][SQL] Add a constructors for ScalaUDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In this upcoming 2.3 release, we changed the interface of `ScalaUDF`. Unfortunately, some Spark packages (e.g., spark-deep-learning) are using our internal class `ScalaUDF`. In the release 2.3, we added new parameters into this class. The users hit the binary compatibility issues and got the exception:

```
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.&lt;init&gt;(Ljava/lang/Object;Lorg/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType;Lscala/collection/Seq;Lscala/collection/Seq;Lscala/Option;)V
```

This PR is to improve the backward compatibility. However, we definitely should not encourage the external packages to use our internal classes. This might make us hard to maintain/develop the codes in Spark.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #20591 from gatorsmile/scalaUDF.
2018-02-13 11:56:49 -08:00
Joseph K. Bradley d58fe28836 [SPARK-23154][ML][DOC] Document backwards compatibility guarantees for ML persistence
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Added documentation about what MLlib guarantees in terms of loading ML models and Pipelines from old Spark versions.  Discussed & confirmed on linked JIRA.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>

Closes #20592 from jkbradley/SPARK-23154-backwards-compat-doc.
2018-02-13 11:18:45 -08:00
Marco Gaido 4e0fb010cc [SPARK-23217][ML] Add cosine distance measure to ClusteringEvaluator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR provided an implementation of ClusteringEvaluator using the cosine distance measure.
This allows to evaluate clustering results created using the cosine distance, introduced in SPARK-22119.

In the corresponding JIRA, there is a design document for the algorithm implemented here.

## How was this patch tested?

Added UT which compares the result to the one provided by python sklearn.

Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>

Closes #20396 from mgaido91/SPARK-23217.
2018-02-13 11:51:19 -06:00
Bogdan Raducanu 05d051293f [SPARK-23316][SQL] AnalysisException after max iteration reached for IN query
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added flag ignoreNullability to DataType.equalsStructurally.
The previous semantic is for ignoreNullability=false.
When ignoreNullability=true equalsStructurally ignores nullability of contained types (map key types, value types, array element types, structure field types).
In.checkInputTypes calls equalsStructurally to check if the children types match. They should match regardless of nullability (which is just a hint), so it is now called with ignoreNullability=true.

## How was this patch tested?
New test in SubquerySuite

Author: Bogdan Raducanu <bogdan@databricks.com>

Closes #20548 from bogdanrdc/SPARK-23316.
2018-02-13 09:49:52 -08:00
xubo245 263531466f [SPARK-23392][TEST] Add some test cases for images feature
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add some test cases for images feature

## How was this patch tested?
Add some test cases in ImageSchemaSuite

Author: xubo245 <601450868@qq.com>

Closes #20583 from xubo245/CARBONDATA23392_AddTestForImage.
2018-02-13 11:45:20 -06:00
guoxiaolong bd24731722 [SPARK-23382][WEB-UI] Spark Streaming ui about the contents of the for need to have hidden and show features, when the table records very much.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark Streaming ui about the contents of the for need to have hidden and show features, when the table records very much.
please refer to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20216

fix after:
![1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26266482/36068644-df029328-0f14-11e8-8350-cfdde9733ffc.png)

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: guoxiaolong <guo.xiaolong1@zte.com.cn>

Closes #20570 from guoxiaolongzte/SPARK-23382.
2018-02-13 11:39:33 -06:00
huangtengfei 091a000d27 [SPARK-23053][CORE] taskBinarySerialization and task partitions calculate in DagScheduler.submitMissingTasks should keep the same RDD checkpoint status
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When we run concurrent jobs using the same rdd which is marked to do checkpoint. If one job has finished running the job, and start the process of RDD.doCheckpoint, while another job is submitted, then submitStage and submitMissingTasks will be called. In [submitMissingTasks](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala#L961), will serialize taskBinaryBytes and calculate task partitions which are both affected by the status of checkpoint, if the former is calculated before doCheckpoint finished, while the latter is calculated after doCheckpoint finished, when run task, rdd.compute will be called, for some rdds with particular partition type such as [UnionRDD](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/UnionRDD.scala) who will do partition type cast, will get a ClassCastException because the part params is actually a CheckpointRDDPartition.
This error occurs  because rdd.doCheckpoint occurs in the same thread that called sc.runJob, while the task serialization occurs in the DAGSchedulers event loop.

## How was this patch tested?

the exist uts and also add a test case in DAGScheduerSuite to show the exception case.

Author: huangtengfei <huangtengfei@huangtengfeideMacBook-Pro.local>

Closes #20244 from ivoson/branch-taskpart-mistype.
2018-02-13 09:59:21 -06:00
“attilapiros” d6e1958a24 [SPARK-23189][CORE][WEB UI] Reflect stage level blacklisting on executor tab
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The purpose of this PR to reflect the stage level blacklisting on the executor tab for the currently active stages.

After this change in the executor tab at the Status column one of the following label will be:

- "Blacklisted" when the executor is blacklisted application level (old flag)
- "Dead" when the executor is not Blacklisted and not Active
- "Blacklisted in Stages: [...]" when the executor is Active but the there are active blacklisted stages for the executor. Within the [] coma separated active stageIDs are listed.
- "Active" when the executor is Active and there is no active blacklisted stages for the executor

## How was this patch tested?

Both with unit tests and manually.

#### Manual test

Spark was started as:

```bash
 bin/spark-shell --master "local-cluster[2,1,1024]" --conf "spark.blacklist.enabled=true" --conf "spark.blacklist.stage.maxFailedTasksPerExecutor=1" --conf "spark.blacklist.application.maxFailedTasksPerExecutor=10"
```

And the job was:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.SparkEnv

val pairs = sc.parallelize(1 to 10000, 10).map { x =>
  if (SparkEnv.get.executorId.toInt == 0) throw new RuntimeException("Bad executor")
  else  {
    Thread.sleep(10)
    (x % 10, x)
  }
}

val all = pairs.cogroup(pairs)

all.collect()
```

UI screenshots about the running:

- One executor is blacklisted in the two stages:

![One executor is blacklisted in two stages](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12908314/multiple_stages_1.png)

- One stage completes the other one is still running:

![One stage completes the other is still running](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12908315/multiple_stages_2.png)

- Both stages are completed:

![Both stages are completed](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12908316/multiple_stages_3.png)

### Unit tests

In AppStatusListenerSuite.scala both the node blacklisting for a stage and the executor blacklisting for stage are tested.

Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>

Closes #20408 from attilapiros/SPARK-23189.
2018-02-13 09:54:52 -06:00
“attilapiros” 116c581d26 [SPARK-20659][CORE] Removing sc.getExecutorStorageStatus and making StorageStatus private
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In this PR StorageStatus is made to private and simplified a bit moreover SparkContext.getExecutorStorageStatus method is removed. The reason of keeping StorageStatus is that it is usage from SparkContext.getRDDStorageInfo.

Instead of the method SparkContext.getExecutorStorageStatus executor infos are extended with additional memory metrics such as usedOnHeapStorageMemory, usedOffHeapStorageMemory, totalOnHeapStorageMemory, totalOffHeapStorageMemory.

## How was this patch tested?

By running existing unit tests.

Author: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Author: Attila Zsolt Piros <2017933+attilapiros@users.noreply.github.com>

Closes #20546 from attilapiros/SPARK-20659.
2018-02-13 06:54:15 -08:00