Commit graph

3378 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
liuxian 1b575ef5d1 [SPARK-26621][CORE] Use ConfigEntry for hardcoded configs for shuffle categories.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR makes hardcoded `spark.shuffle` configs to use ConfigEntry and put them in the config package.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests

Closes #23550 from 10110346/ConfigEntry_shuffle.

Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2019-01-17 12:29:17 -06:00
Maxim Gekk 6f8c0e5255 [SPARK-26593][SQL] Use Proleptic Gregorian calendar in casting UTF8String to Date/TimestampType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the PR, I propose to use *java.time* classes in `stringToDate` and `stringToTimestamp`. This switches the methods from the hybrid calendar (Gregorian+Julian) to Proleptic Gregorian calendar. And it should make the casting consistent to other Spark classes that converts textual representation of dates/timestamps to `DateType`/`TimestampType`.

## How was this patch tested?

The changes were tested by existing suites - `HashExpressionsSuite`, `CastSuite` and `DateTimeUtilsSuite`.

Closes #23512 from MaxGekk/utf8string-timestamp-parsing.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
2019-01-17 17:53:00 +01:00
Gengliang Wang c0632cec04 [SPARK-23817][SQL] Create file source V2 framework and migrate ORC read path
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Create a framework for file source V2 based on data source V2 API.
As a good example for demonstrating the framework, this PR also migrate ORC source. This is because ORC file source supports both row scan and columnar scan, and the implementation is simpler comparing with Parquet.

Note: Currently only read path of V2 API is done, this framework and migration are only for the read path.
Supports the following scan:
- Scan ColumnarBatch
- Scan UnsafeRow
- Push down filters
- Push down required columns

Not supported( due to the limitation of data source V2 API):
- Stats metrics
- Catalog table
- Writes

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test

Closes #23383 from gengliangwang/latest_orcV2.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2019-01-17 23:33:29 +08:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 8f170787d2
[SPARK-26619][SQL] Prune the unused serializers from SerializeFromObject
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`SerializeFromObject` now keeps all serializer expressions for domain object even when only part of output attributes are used by top plan.

We should be able to prune unused serializers from `SerializeFromObject` in such case.

## How was this patch tested?

Added tests.

Closes #23562 from viirya/SPARK-26619.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
2019-01-16 19:16:37 +00:00
Maxim Gekk 33b5039cd3 [SPARK-25935][SQL] Allow null rows for bad records from JSON/CSV parsers
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR reverts  #22938 per discussion in #23325

Closes #23325

Closes #23543 from MaxGekk/return-nulls-from-json-parser.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2019-01-15 13:02:55 +08:00
Maxim Gekk 115fecfd84 [SPARK-26456][SQL] Cast date/timestamp to string by Date/TimestampFormatter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the PR, I propose to switch on `TimestampFormatter`/`DateFormatter` in casting dates/timestamps to strings. The changes should make the date/timestamp casting consistent to JSON/CSV datasources and time-related functions like `to_date`, `to_unix_timestamp`/`from_unixtime`.

Local formatters are moved out from `DateTimeUtils` to where they are actually used. It allows to avoid re-creation of new formatter instance per-each call. Another reason is to have separate parser for `PartitioningUtils` because default parsing pattern cannot be used (expected optional section `[.S]`).

## How was this patch tested?

It was tested by `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `CastSuite` and `JDBC*Suite`.

Closes #23391 from MaxGekk/thread-local-date-format.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2019-01-14 21:59:25 +08:00
maryannxue 985f966b9c [SPARK-26065][FOLLOW-UP][SQL] Revert hint behavior in join reordering
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is to fix a bug in #23036 that would cause a join hint to be applied on node it is not supposed to after join reordering. For example,
```
  val join = df.join(df, "id")
  val broadcasted = join.hint("broadcast")
  val join2 = join.join(broadcasted, "id").join(broadcasted, "id")
```
There should only be 2 broadcast hints on `join2`, but after join reordering there would be 4. It is because the hint application in join reordering compares the attribute set for testing relation equivalency.
Moreover, it could still be problematic even if the child relations were used in testing relation equivalency, due to the potential exprId conflict in nested self-join.

As a result, this PR simply reverts the join reorder hint behavior change introduced in #23036, which means if a join hint is present, the join node itself will not participate in the join reordering, while the sub-joins within its children still can.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new tests

Closes #23524 from maryannxue/query-hint-followup-2.

Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2019-01-13 15:30:45 -08:00
Bruce Robbins 09b05487b7 [SPARK-26450][SQL] Avoid rebuilding map of schema for every column in projection
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When creating some unsafe projections, Spark rebuilds the map of schema attributes once for each expression in the projection. Some file format readers create one unsafe projection per input file, others create one per task. ProjectExec also creates one unsafe projection per task. As a result, for wide queries on wide tables, Spark might build the map of schema attributes hundreds of thousands of times.

This PR changes two functions to reuse the same AttributeSeq instance when creating BoundReference objects for each expression in the projection. This avoids the repeated rebuilding of the map of schema attributes.

### Benchmarks

The time saved by this PR depends on size of the schema, size of the projection, number of input files (or number of file splits), number of tasks, and file format. I chose a couple of example cases.

In the following tests, I ran the query
```sql
select * from table where id1 = 1
```

Matching rows are about 0.2% of the table.

#### Orc table 6000 columns, 500K rows, 34 input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
1.772306 min | 1.487267 min | 16.082943%

#### Orc table 6000 columns, 500K rows, *17* input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
 1.656400 min | 1.423550 min | 14.057595%

#### Orc table 60 columns, 50M rows, 34 input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
0.299878 min | 0.290339 min | 3.180926%

#### Parquet table 6000 columns, 500K rows, 34 input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
1.478306 min | 1.373728 min | 7.074165%

Note: The parquet reader does not create an unsafe projection. However, the filter operation in the query causes the planner to add a ProjectExec, which does create an unsafe projection for each task. So these results have nothing to do with Parquet itself.

#### Parquet table 60 columns, 50M rows, 34 input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
0.245006 min | 0.242200 min | 1.145099%

#### CSV table 6000 columns, 500K rows, 34 input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
2.390117 min | 2.182778 min | 8.674844%

#### CSV table 60 columns, 50M rows, 34 input files

baseline | pr | improvement
----|----|----
1.520911 min | 1.510211 min | 0.703526%

## How was this patch tested?

SQL unit tests
Python core and SQL test

Closes #23392 from bersprockets/norebuild.

Authored-by: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
2019-01-13 23:54:19 +01:00
Maxim Gekk 4ff2b94a7c [SPARK-26503][CORE][DOC][FOLLOWUP] Get rid of spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` was removed by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23495. The PR cleans up the SQL migration guide and the comment for `UnixTimestamp`.

Closes #23529 from MaxGekk/get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-13 11:20:22 +08:00
Sean Owen 51a6ba0181 [SPARK-26503][CORE] Get rid of spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Per discussion in #23391 (comment) this proposes to just remove the old pre-Spark-3 time parsing behavior.

This is a rebase of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23411

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #23495 from srowen/SPARK-26503.2.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2019-01-11 08:53:12 -06:00
Wenchen Fan 1f1d98c6fa [SPARK-26580][SQL] remove Scala 2.11 hack for Scala UDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732 , we tried our best to keep the behavior of Scala UDF unchanged in Spark 2.4.

However, since Spark 3.0, Scala 2.12 is the default. The trick that was used to keep the behavior unchanged doesn't work with Scala 2.12.

This PR proposes to remove the Scala 2.11 hack, as it's not useful.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

Closes #23498 from cloud-fan/udf.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2019-01-11 14:52:13 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun 270916f8cd
[SPARK-26584][SQL] Remove spark.sql.orc.copyBatchToSpark internal conf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to remove internal ORC configuration to simplify the code path for Spark 3.0.0. This removes the configuration `spark.sql.orc.copyBatchToSpark` and related ORC codes including tests and benchmarks.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with the reduced test coverage.

Closes #23503 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-26584.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2019-01-10 08:42:23 -08:00
Wenchen Fan 6955638eae [SPARK-26459][SQL] replace UpdateNullabilityInAttributeReferences with FixNullability
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18576

The newly added rule `UpdateNullabilityInAttributeReferences` does the same thing the `FixNullability` does, we only need to keep one of them.

This PR removes `UpdateNullabilityInAttributeReferences`, and use `FixNullability` to replace it. Also rename it to `UpdateAttributeNullability`

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Closes #23390 from cloud-fan/nullable.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
2019-01-10 20:15:25 +09:00
Maxim Gekk 73c7b126c6 [SPARK-26546][SQL] Caching of java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Added a cache for  java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter instances with keys consist of pattern and locale. This should allow to avoid parsing of timestamp/date patterns each time when new instance of `TimestampFormatter`/`DateFormatter` is created.

## How was this patch tested?

By existing test suites `TimestampFormatterSuite`/`DateFormatterSuite` and `JsonFunctionsSuite`/`JsonSuite`.

Closes #23462 from MaxGekk/time-formatter-caching.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-10 10:32:20 +08:00
Jamison Bennett 1a47233f99 [SPARK-26493][SQL] Allow multiple spark.sql.extensions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Allow multiple spark.sql.extensions to be specified in the
configuration.

## How was this patch tested?

New tests are added.

Closes #23398 from jamisonbennett/SPARK-26493.

Authored-by: Jamison Bennett <jamison.bennett@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-10 10:23:03 +08:00
maryannxue 2d01bccbd4 [SPARK-26065][FOLLOW-UP][SQL] Fix the Failure when having two Consecutive Hints
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is to fix a bug in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23036, which would lead to an exception in case of two consecutive hints.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a new test.

Closes #23501 from maryannxue/query-hint-followup.

Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2019-01-09 14:31:26 -08:00
Wenchen Fan e853afb416 [SPARK-26448][SQL] retain the difference between 0.0 and -0.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043 , we introduced a behavior change: Spark users are not able to distinguish 0.0 and -0.0 anymore.

This PR proposes an alternative fix to the original bug, to retain the difference between 0.0 and -0.0 inside Spark.

The idea is, we can rewrite the window partition key, join key and grouping key during logical phase, to normalize the special floating numbers. Thus only operators care about special floating numbers need to pay the perf overhead, and end users can distinguish -0.0.

## How was this patch tested?

existing test

Closes #23388 from cloud-fan/minor.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2019-01-09 13:50:32 -08:00
“attilapiros” c101182b10 [SPARK-26002][SQL] Fix day of year calculation for Julian calendar days
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fixing leap year calculations for date operators (year/month/dayOfYear) where the Julian calendars are used (before 1582-10-04). In a Julian calendar every years which are multiples of 4 are leap years (there is no extra exception for years multiples of 100).

## How was this patch tested?

With a unit test ("SPARK-26002: correct day of year calculations for Julian calendar years") which focuses to these corner cases.

Manually:

```
scala> sql("select year('1500-01-01')").show()

+------------------------------+
|year(CAST(1500-01-01 AS DATE))|
+------------------------------+
|                          1500|
+------------------------------+

scala> sql("select dayOfYear('1100-01-01')").show()

+-----------------------------------+
|dayofyear(CAST(1100-01-01 AS DATE))|
+-----------------------------------+
|                                  1|
+-----------------------------------+
```

Closes #23000 from attilapiros/julianOffByDays.

Authored-by: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2019-01-09 01:24:47 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 72a572ffd6 [SPARK-26323][SQL] Scala UDF should still check input types even if some inputs are of type Any
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For Scala UDF, when checking input nullability, we will skip inputs with type `Any`, and only check the inputs that provide nullability info.

We should do the same for checking input types.

## How was this patch tested?

new tests

Closes #23275 from cloud-fan/udf.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-08 22:44:33 +08:00
maryannxue 98be8953c7 [SPARK-26065][SQL] Change query hint from a LogicalPlan to a field
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The existing query hint implementation relies on a logical plan node `ResolvedHint` to store query hints in logical plans, and on `Statistics` in physical plans. Since `ResolvedHint` is not really a logical operator and can break the pattern matching for existing and future optimization rules, it is a issue to the Optimizer as the old `AnalysisBarrier` was to the Analyzer.

Given the fact that all our query hints are either 1) a join hint, i.e., broadcast hint; or 2) a re-partition hint, which is indeed an operator, we only need to add a hint field on the Join plan and that will be a good enough solution for the current hint usage.

This PR is to let `Join` node have a hint for its left sub-tree and another hint for its right sub-tree and each hint is a merged result of all the effective hints specified in the corresponding sub-tree. The "effectiveness" of a hint, i.e., whether that hint should be propagated to the `Join` node, is currently consistent with the hint propagation rules originally implemented in the `Statistics` approach. Note that the `ResolvedHint` node still has to live through the analysis stage because of the `Dataset` interface, but it will be got rid of and moved to the `Join` node in the "pre-optimization" stage.

This PR also introduces a change in how hints work with join reordering. Before this PR, hints would stop join reordering. For example, in "a.join(b).join(c).hint("broadcast").join(d)", the broadcast hint would stop d from participating in the cost-based join reordering while still allowing reordering from under the hint node. After this PR, though, the broadcast hint will not interfere with join reordering at all, and after reordering if a relation associated with a hint stays unchanged or equivalent to the original relation, the hint will be retained, otherwise will be discarded. For example, the original plan is like "a.join(b).hint("broadcast").join(c).hint("broadcast").join(d)", thus the join order is "a JOIN b JOIN c JOIN d". So if after reordering the join order becomes "a JOIN b JOIN (c JOIN d)", the plan will be like "a.join(b).hint("broadcast").join(c.join(d))"; but if after reordering the join order becomes "a JOIN c JOIN b JOIN d", the plan will be like "a.join(c).join(b).hint("broadcast").join(d)".

## How was this patch tested?

Added new tests.

Closes #23036 from maryannxue/query-hint.

Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2019-01-07 13:59:40 -08:00
Kris Mok 4ab5b5b918 [SPARK-26545] Fix typo in EqualNullSafe's truth table comment
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The truth table comment in EqualNullSafe incorrectly marked FALSE results as UNKNOWN.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Closes #23461 from rednaxelafx/fix-typo.

Authored-by: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2019-01-05 14:37:04 -08:00
Maxim Gekk 980e6bcd1c [SPARK-26246][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Inferring TimestampType from JSON
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Added new JSON option `inferTimestamp` (`true` by default) to control inferring of `TimestampType` from string values.

## How was this patch tested?

Add new UT to `JsonInferSchemaSuite`.

Closes #23455 from MaxGekk/json-infer-time-followup.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-05 21:50:27 +08:00
Hyukjin Kwon 56967b7e28 [SPARK-26403][SQL] Support pivoting using array column for pivot(column) API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes `pivot(Column)` can accepts `collection.mutable.WrappedArray`.

Note that we return `collection.mutable.WrappedArray` from `ArrayType`, and `Literal.apply` doesn't support this.

We can unwrap the array and use it for type dispatch.

```scala
val df = Seq(
  (2, Seq.empty[String]),
  (2, Seq("a", "x")),
  (3, Seq.empty[String]),
  (3, Seq("a", "x"))).toDF("x", "s")
df.groupBy("x").pivot("s").count().show()
```

Before:

```
Unsupported literal type class scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray$ofRef WrappedArray()
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unsupported literal type class scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray$ofRef WrappedArray()
	at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Literal$.apply(literals.scala:80)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.$anonfun$pivot$2(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:427)
	at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
	at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:36)
	at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach$(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:33)
	at scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray.foreach(WrappedArray.scala:39)
	at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
	at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
	at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:108)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.pivot(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:425)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.pivot(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:406)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.pivot(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:317)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFramePivotSuite.$anonfun$new$1(DataFramePivotSuite.scala:341)
	at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
```

After:

```
+---+---+------+
|  x| []|[a, x]|
+---+---+------+
|  3|  1|     1|
|  2|  1|     1|
+---+---+------+
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested and unittests were added.

Closes #23349 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26403.

Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-03 11:01:54 +08:00
Maxim Gekk 8be4d24a27 [SPARK-26023][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Dumping truncated plans and generated code to a file
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`DataSourceScanExec` overrides "wrong" `treeString` method without `append`. In the PR, I propose to make `treeString`s **final** to prevent such mistakes in the future. And removed the `treeString` and `verboseString` since they both use `simpleString` with reduction.

## How was this patch tested?

It was tested by `DataSourceScanExecRedactionSuite`

Closes #23431 from MaxGekk/datasource-scan-exec-followup.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2019-01-02 16:57:10 -08:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 79b05481a2 [SPARK-26508][CORE][SQL] Address warning messages in Java reported at lgtm.com
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR addresses warning messages in Java files reported at [lgtm.com](https://lgtm.com).

[lgtm.com](https://lgtm.com) provides automated code review of Java/Python/JavaScript files for OSS projects. [Here](https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/spark/alerts/?mode=list&severity=warning) are warning messages regarding Apache Spark project.

This PR addresses the following warnings:

- Result of multiplication cast to wider type
- Implicit narrowing conversion in compound assignment
- Boxed variable is never null
- Useless null check

NOTE: `Potential input resource leak` looks false positive for now.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing UTs

Closes #23420 from kiszk/SPARK-26508.

Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2019-01-01 22:37:28 -06:00
Maxim Gekk 5da55873fa [SPARK-26374][TEST][SQL] Enable TimestampFormatter in HadoopFsRelationTest
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Default timestamp pattern defined in `JSONOptions` doesn't allow saving/loading timestamps with time zones of seconds precision. Because of that, the round trip test failed for timestamps before 1582. In the PR, I propose to extend zone offset section from `XXX` to `XXXXX` which should allow to save/load zone offsets like `-07:52:48`.

## How was this patch tested?

It was tested by `JsonHadoopFsRelationSuite` and `TimestampFormatterSuite`.

Closes #23417 from MaxGekk/hadoopfsrelationtest-new-formatter.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-01-02 07:59:32 +08:00
zhoukang 2bf4d97118 [SPARK-24544][SQL] Print actual failure cause when look up function failed
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When we operate as below:
`
0: jdbc:hive2://xxx/> create  function funnel_analysis as 'com.xxx.hive.extend.udf.UapFunnelAnalysis';
`

`
0: jdbc:hive2://xxx/> select funnel_analysis(1,",",1,'');
Error: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Undefined function: 'funnel_analysis'. This function is neither a registered temporary function nor a permanent function registered in the database 'xxx'.; line 1 pos 7 (state=,code=0)
`

`
0: jdbc:hive2://xxx/> describe function funnel_analysis;
+-----------------------------------------------------------+--+
|                       function_desc                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+--+
| Function: xxx.funnel_analysis                            |
| Class: com.xxx.hive.extend.udf.UapFunnelAnalysis  |
| Usage: N/A.                                               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+--+
`
We can see describe funtion will get right information,but when we actually use this funtion,we will get an undefined exception.
Which is really misleading,the real cause is below:
 `
No handler for Hive UDF 'com.xxx.xxx.hive.extend.udf.UapFunnelAnalysis': java.lang.IllegalStateException: Should not be called directly;
	at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.udf.generic.GenericUDTF.initialize(GenericUDTF.java:72)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.outputInspector$lzycompute(hiveUDFs.scala:204)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.outputInspector(hiveUDFs.scala:204)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.elementSchema$lzycompute(hiveUDFs.scala:212)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveGenericUDTF.elementSchema(hiveUDFs.scala:212)
`
This patch print the actual failure for quick debugging.
## How was this patch tested?
UT

Closes #21790 from caneGuy/zhoukang/print-warning1.

Authored-by: zhoukang <zhoukang199191@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2019-01-01 09:13:13 -06:00
Maxim Gekk 89c92ccc20 [SPARK-26504][SQL] Rope-wise dumping of Spark plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Proposed new class `StringConcat` for converting a sequence of strings to string with one memory allocation in the `toString` method.  `StringConcat` replaces `StringBuilderWriter` in methods of dumping of Spark plans and codegen to strings.

All `Writer` arguments are replaced by `String => Unit` in methods related to Spark plans stringification.

## How was this patch tested?

It was tested by existing suites `QueryExecutionSuite`, `DebuggingSuite` as well as new tests for `StringConcat` in `StringUtilsSuite`.

Closes #23406 from MaxGekk/rope-plan.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
2018-12-31 16:39:46 +01:00
Dongjoon Hyun e0054b88a1
[SPARK-26424][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix DateFormatClass/UnixTime codegen
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes the codegen bug introduced by #23358 .

- https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7-ubuntu-scala-2.11/158/

```
Line 44, Column 93: A method named "apply" is not declared in any enclosing class
nor any supertype, nor through a static import
```

## How was this patch tested?

Manual. `DateExpressionsSuite` should be passed with Scala-2.11.

Closes #23394 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-26424.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2018-12-28 11:29:06 -08:00
Kevin Yu add287f397 [SPARK-25892][SQL] Change AttributeReference.withMetadata's return type to AttributeReference
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently the `AttributeReference.withMetadata` method have return type `Attribute`, the rest of with methods in the `AttributeReference` return type are `AttributeReference`, as the [spark-25892](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25892?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20component%20in%20(ML%2C%20PySpark%2C%20SQL)) mentioned.
This PR will change `AttributeReference.withMetadata` method's return type from `Attribute` to `AttributeReference`.
## How was this patch tested?

Run all `sql/test,` `catalyst/test` and `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.*`

Closes #22918 from kevinyu98/spark-25892.

Authored-by: Kevin Yu <qyu@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-27 22:26:37 +08:00
Maxim Gekk a1c1dd3484 [SPARK-26191][SQL] Control truncation of Spark plans via maxFields parameter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the PR, I propose to add `maxFields` parameter to all functions involved in creation of textual representation of spark plans such as `simpleString` and `verboseString`. New parameter restricts number of fields converted to truncated strings. Any elements beyond the limit will be dropped and replaced by a `"... N more fields"` placeholder. The threshold is bumped up to `Int.MaxValue` for `toFile()`.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a test to `QueryExecutionSuite` which checks `maxFields` impacts on number of truncated fields in `LocalRelation`.

Closes #23159 from MaxGekk/to-file-max-fields.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
2018-12-27 11:13:16 +01:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh f89cdec8b9 [SPARK-26435][SQL] Support creating partitioned table using Hive CTAS by specifying partition column names
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Spark SQL doesn't support creating partitioned table using Hive CTAS in SQL syntax. However it is supported by using DataFrameWriter API.

```scala
val df = Seq(("a", 1)).toDF("part", "id")
df.write.format("hive").partitionBy("part").saveAsTable("t")
```
Hive begins to support this syntax in newer version: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20241:

```
CREATE TABLE t PARTITIONED BY (part) AS SELECT 1 as id, "a" as part
```

This patch adds this support to SQL syntax.

## How was this patch tested?

Added tests.

Closes #23376 from viirya/hive-ctas-partitioned-table.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2018-12-27 16:03:14 +08:00
Maxim Gekk 7c7fccfeb5 [SPARK-26424][SQL] Use java.time API in date/timestamp expressions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the PR, I propose to switch the `DateFormatClass`, `ToUnixTimestamp`, `FromUnixTime`, `UnixTime` on java.time API for parsing/formatting dates and timestamps. The API has been already implemented by the `Timestamp`/`DateFormatter` classes. One of benefit is those classes support parsing timestamps with microsecond precision. Old behaviour can be switched on via SQL config: `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` (`false` by default).

## How was this patch tested?

It was tested by existing test suites - `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`, `JsonSuite`, `CsvSuite`, `SQLQueryTestSuite` as well as PySpark tests.

Closes #23358 from MaxGekk/new-time-cast.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2018-12-27 11:09:50 +08:00
wangyanlin01 827383a97c [SPARK-26426][SQL] fix ExpresionInfo assert error in windows operation system.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix ExpresionInfo assert error in windows operation system, when running unit tests.

## How was this patch tested?
unit tests

Closes #23363 from yanlin-Lynn/unit-test-windows.

Authored-by: wangyanlin01 <wangyanlin01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-25 15:53:42 +08:00
Sean Owen 0523f5e378
[SPARK-14023][CORE][SQL] Don't reference 'field' in StructField errors for clarity in exceptions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Variation of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
I cheated by not referencing fields or columns at all as this exception propagates in contexts where both would be applicable.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Closes #23373 from srowen/SPARK-14023.2.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2018-12-23 21:09:44 -08:00
DB Tsai a5a24d92bd
[SPARK-26402][SQL] Accessing nested fields with different cases in case insensitive mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

GetStructField with different optional names should be semantically equal. We will use this as building block to compare the nested fields used in the plans to be optimized by catalyst optimizer.

This PR also fixes a bug below that accessing nested fields with different cases in case insensitive mode will result `AnalysisException`.

```
sql("create table t (s struct<i: Int>) using json")
sql("select s.I from t group by s.i")
```
which is currently failing
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: expression 'default.t.`s`' is neither present in the group by, nor is it an aggregate function
```
as cloud-fan pointed out.

## How was this patch tested?

New tests are added.

Closes #23353 from dbtsai/nestedEqual.

Lead-authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: DB Tsai <dbtsai@dbtsai.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2018-12-22 10:35:14 -08:00
Jungtaek Lim 90a810352e [SPARK-25245][DOCS][SS] Explain regarding limiting modification on "spark.sql.shuffle.partitions" for structured streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch adds explanation of `why "spark.sql.shuffle.partitions" keeps unchanged in structured streaming`, which couple of users already wondered and some of them even thought it as a bug.

This patch would help other end users to know about such behavior before they find by theirselves and being wondered.

## How was this patch tested?

No need to test because this is a simple addition on guide doc with markdown editor.

Closes #22238 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-25245.

Lead-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2018-12-22 10:32:32 -06:00
Marco Gaido 98c0ca7861 [SPARK-26308][SQL] Avoid cast of decimals for ScalaUDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, when we infer the schema for scala/java decimals, we return as data type the `SYSTEM_DEFAULT` implementation, ie. the decimal type with precision 38 and scale 18. But this is not right, as we know nothing about the right precision and scale and these values can be not enough to store the data. This problem arises in particular with UDF, where we cast all the input of type `DecimalType` to a `DecimalType(38, 18)`: in case this is not enough, null is returned as input for the UDF.

The PR defines a custom handling for casting to the expected data types for ScalaUDF: the decimal precision and scale is picked from the input, so no casting to different and maybe wrong percision and scale happens.

## How was this patch tested?

added UTs

Closes #23308 from mgaido91/SPARK-26308.

Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2018-12-20 14:17:44 +08:00
李亮 04d8e3a33c [SPARK-26318][SQL] Deprecate Row.merge
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecate Row.merge

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Closes #23271 from KyleLi1985/master.

Authored-by: 李亮 <liang.li.work@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-20 13:22:12 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 08f74ada36
[SPARK-26390][SQL] ColumnPruning rule should only do column pruning
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a small clean up.

By design catalyst rules should be orthogonal: each rule should have its own responsibility. However, the `ColumnPruning` rule does not only do column pruning, but also remove no-op project and window.

This PR updates the `RemoveRedundantProject` rule to remove no-op window as well, and clean up the `ColumnPruning` rule to only do column pruning.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Closes #23343 from cloud-fan/column-pruning.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2018-12-19 09:41:30 -08:00
Marco Gaido 834b860979 [SPARK-26366][SQL] ReplaceExceptWithFilter should consider NULL as False
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In `ReplaceExceptWithFilter` we do not consider properly the case in which the condition returns NULL. Indeed, in that case, since negating NULL still returns NULL, so it is not true the assumption that negating the condition returns all the rows which didn't satisfy it, rows returning NULL may not be returned. This happens when constraints inferred by `InferFiltersFromConstraints` are not enough, as it happens with `OR` conditions.

The rule had also problems with non-deterministic conditions: in such a scenario, this rule would change the probability of the output.

The PR fixes these problem by:
 - returning False for the condition when it is Null (in this way we do return all the rows which didn't satisfy it);
 - avoiding any transformation when the condition is non-deterministic.

## How was this patch tested?

added UTs

Closes #23315 from mgaido91/SPARK-26366.

Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2018-12-18 23:21:52 -08:00
Maxim Gekk d72571e51d [SPARK-26246][SQL] Inferring TimestampType from JSON
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The `JsonInferSchema` class is extended to support `TimestampType` inferring from string fields in JSON input:
- If the `prefersDecimal` option is set to `true`, it tries to infer decimal type from the string field.
- If decimal type inference fails or `prefersDecimal` is disabled, `JsonInferSchema` tries to infer `TimestampType`.
- If timestamp type inference fails, `StringType` is returned as the inferred type.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new test suite - `JsonInferSchemaSuite` to check date and timestamp types inferring from JSON using `JsonInferSchema` directly. A few tests were added `JsonSuite` to check type merging and roundtrip tests. This changes was tested by `JsonSuite`, `JsonExpressionsSuite` and `JsonFunctionsSuite` as well.

Closes #23201 from MaxGekk/json-infer-time.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-18 13:50:55 +08:00
Li Jin 86100df54b [SPARK-24561][SQL][PYTHON] User-defined window aggregation functions with Pandas UDF (bounded window)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR implements a new feature - window aggregation Pandas UDF for bounded window.

#### Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14EjeY5z4-NC27-SmIP9CsMPCANeTcvxN44a7SIJtZPc/edit#heading=h.c87w44wcj3wj

#### Example:
```
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
from pyspark.sql.window import Window

df = spark.range(0, 10, 2).toDF('v')
w1 = Window.partitionBy().orderBy('v').rangeBetween(-2, 4)
w2 = Window.partitionBy().orderBy('v').rowsBetween(-2, 2)

pandas_udf('double', PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
def avg(v):
    return v.mean()

df.withColumn('v_mean', avg(df['v']).over(w1)).show()
# +---+------+
# |  v|v_mean|
# +---+------+
# |  0|   1.0|
# |  2|   2.0|
# |  4|   4.0|
# |  6|   6.0|
# |  8|   7.0|
# +---+------+

df.withColumn('v_mean', avg(df['v']).over(w2)).show()
# +---+------+
# |  v|v_mean|
# +---+------+
# |  0|   2.0|
# |  2|   3.0|
# |  4|   4.0|
# |  6|   5.0|
# |  8|   6.0|
# +---+------+

```

#### High level changes:

This PR modifies the existing WindowInPandasExec physical node to deal with unbounded (growing, shrinking and sliding) windows.

* `WindowInPandasExec` now share the same base class as `WindowExec` and share utility functions. See `WindowExecBase`
* `WindowFunctionFrame` now has two new functions `currentLowerBound` and `currentUpperBound` - to return the lower and upper window bound for the current output row. It is also modified to allow `AggregateProcessor` == null. Null aggregator processor is used for `WindowInPandasExec` where we don't have an aggregator and only uses lower and upper bound functions from `WindowFunctionFrame`
* The biggest change is in `WindowInPandasExec`, where it is modified to take `currentLowerBound` and `currentUpperBound` and write those values together with the input data to the python process for rolling window aggregation. See `WindowInPandasExec` for more details.

#### Discussion
In benchmarking, I found numpy variant of the rolling window UDF is much faster than the pandas version:

Spark SQL window function: 20s
Pandas variant: ~80s
Numpy variant: 10s
Numpy variant with numba: 4s

Allowing numpy variant of the vectorized UDFs is something I want to discuss because of the performance improvement, but doesn't have to be in this PR.

## How was this patch tested?

New tests

Closes #22305 from icexelloss/SPARK-24561-bounded-window-udf.

Authored-by: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-18 09:15:21 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 12640d674b [SPARK-26243][SQL][FOLLOWUP] fix code style issues in TimestampFormatter.scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

1. rename `FormatterUtils` to `DateTimeFormatterHelper`, and move it to a separated file
2. move `DateFormatter` and its implementation to a separated file
3. mark some methods as private
4. add `override` to some methods

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Closes #23329 from cloud-fan/minor.

Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-17 21:47:38 +08:00
gatorsmile f6888f7c94 [SPARK-20636] Add the rule TransposeWindow to the optimization batch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a follow-up of the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899. It is to add the rule TransposeWindow the optimizer batch.

## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.

Closes #23222 from gatorsmile/followupSPARK-20636.

Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
2018-12-17 00:13:51 -08:00
Kris Mok 56448c6623 [SPARK-26352][SQL] join reorder should not change the order of output attributes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The optimizer rule `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin` performs join reordering on inner joins. This was introduced from SPARK-12032 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073) in 2015-12.

After it had reordered the joins, though, it didn't check whether or not the output attribute order is still the same as before. Thus, it's possible to have a mismatch between the reordered output attributes order vs the schema that a DataFrame thinks it has.
The same problem exists in the CBO version of join reordering (`CostBasedJoinReorder`) too.

This can be demonstrated with the example:
```scala
spark.sql("create table table_a (x int, y int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_b (i int, j int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_c (a int, b int) using parquet")
val df = spark.sql("""
  with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b)
  select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i
""")
```
here's what the DataFrame thinks:
```
scala> df.printSchema
root
 |-- x: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- y: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- i: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- j: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- a: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- b: integer (nullable = true)
```
here's what the optimized plan thinks, after join reordering:
```
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
```

If we exclude the `ReorderJoin` rule (using Spark 2.4's optimizer rule exclusion feature), it's back to normal:
```
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules", "org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin")

scala> val df = spark.sql("with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b) select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [x: int, y: int ... 4 more fields]

scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
```

Note that this output attribute ordering problem leads to data corruption, and can manifest itself in various symptoms:
* Silently corrupting data, if the reordered columns happen to either have matching types or have sufficiently-compatible types (e.g. all fixed length primitive types are considered as "sufficiently compatible" in an `UnsafeRow`), then only the resulting data is going to be wrong but it might not trigger any alarms immediately. Or
* Weird Java-level exceptions like `java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException`, or even SIGSEGVs.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new unit test in `JoinReorderSuite` and new end-to-end test in `JoinSuite`.
Also made `JoinReorderSuite` and `StarJoinReorderSuite` assert more strongly on maintaining output attribute order.

Closes #23303 from rednaxelafx/fix-join-reorder.

Authored-by: Kris Mok <rednaxelafx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2018-12-17 13:41:20 +08:00
Hyukjin Kwon db1c5b1839 Revert "[SPARK-26248][SQL] Infer date type from CSV"
This reverts commit 5217f7b226.
2018-12-17 11:53:14 +08:00
Maxim Gekk 5217f7b226 [SPARK-26248][SQL] Infer date type from CSV
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The `CSVInferSchema` class is extended to support inferring of `DateType` from CSV input. The attempt to infer `DateType` is performed after inferring `TimestampType`.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new test for inferring date types from CSV . It was also tested by existing suites like `CSVInferSchemaSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and `CsvSuite`.

Closes #23202 from MaxGekk/csv-date-inferring.

Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2018-12-17 08:24:51 +08:00
Bruce Robbins e3e33d8794 [SPARK-26372][SQL] Don't reuse value from previous row when parsing bad CSV input field
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

CSV parsing accidentally uses the previous good value for a bad input field. See example in Jira.

This PR ensures that the associated column is set to null when an input field cannot be converted.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new test.
Ran all SQL unit tests (testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.*).
Ran pyspark tests for pyspark-sql

Closes #23323 from bersprockets/csv-bad-field.

Authored-by: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-16 11:02:00 +08:00
Marco Gaido cd815ae6c5 [SPARK-26078][SQL] Dedup self-join attributes on IN subqueries
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When there is a self-join as result of a IN subquery, the join condition may be invalid, resulting in trivially true predicates and return wrong results.

The PR deduplicates the subquery output in order to avoid the issue.

## How was this patch tested?

added UT

Closes #23057 from mgaido91/SPARK-26078.

Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2018-12-16 10:57:11 +08:00